42:
210:"... to fight their counterparts in the opposing fleet..." seems odd to me (I might be wrong on this one though) because it appears to me to indicate a specific opposing fleet. Shouldn't it be "in opposing fleets"? Once again, not being a native speaker of English, I might be totally off on this one, so think of this as a question rather than a GAR issue.
47:
190:
The article contains a link to disambiguation page "Roll", and a link to "Merchantmen" redirect pointed at "Merchantman" disambiguation page. Please pipe the links to specific target articles
126:
122:
107:
52:
80:
99:
70:
115:
17:
75:
213:
Shouldn't the "(fully loaded)" be presented without the brackets? Right now it seems the sentence is missing a word at its end.
92:
231:
Was a fire-control director added in 1917 or was it installed originally? I can't really deduce that from the current wording.
156:
216:
The prose indicates the QF guns were
Vickers guns, but the infobox lists Hotchkiss QF guns instead. Which were those?
273:
242:
and the Battle of
Jutland in the main body of the prose - they are mentioned previously in the lead only.
184:
291:
277:
262:
174:
160:
287:
269:
258:
170:
150:
193:
Both DAB pages contain the specific definition used here; there are no articles for these terms.
268:
I normally only link once per article, otherwise all addressed. Thanks for the review.--
219:
Does the ship in "The ship's foremast was converted to a tripod mast..." refer to the
283:
254:
166:
146:
207:
Prose (and embedded table) referencing appears to be in order (no action required)
246:
253:
Nice work. The article needs just a bit of mending before it can be passed.--
180:
Checklinks reports no problems with external links (no action required)
183:
There is a duplicate link in the article which should be removed per
201:
Images have appropriate licences and captions (no action required)
198:
Copyvio
Detector reports no violations (no action requried)
134:
103:
234:I think WP:OVERLINK does not prohibit linking
8:
204:The article is stable (no action required)
30:
226:Yes, Black Prince had been sunk in 1916.
61:
33:
7:
18:Talk:Duke of Edinburgh-class cruiser
165:I'll review this article shortly.--
24:
1:
292:08:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
278:18:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
263:11:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
175:12:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
161:12:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
310:
187:. That is: Muzzle velocity
282:Good to go then.--
245:Why not wikilink
221:Duke of Edinburgh
89:
88:
301:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
309:
308:
304:
303:
302:
300:
299:
298:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
307:
305:
297:
296:
295:
294:
251:
250:
243:
232:
229:
228:
227:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
195:
194:
188:
181:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
306:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
270:Sturmvogel 66
267:
266:
265:
264:
260:
256:
248:
244:
241:
237:
233:
230:
225:
224:
222:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
192:
191:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:
177:
176:
172:
168:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
252:
239:
235:
220:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
247:Grand Fleet
185:WP:OVERLINK
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
284:Tomobe03
255:Tomobe03
167:Tomobe03
157:contribs
147:Tomobe03
76:Criteria
240:Breslau
223:alone?
127:history
108:history
94:Article
236:Goeben
136:Watch
16:<
288:talk
274:talk
259:talk
171:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
290:)
276:)
261:)
238:,
173:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
286:(
272:(
257:(
249:?
169:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.