878:
855:
841:
810:
786:
759:
749:
724:
710:
696:
665:
651:
318:
You know, I bet if we can get a look at the module's reviews (and maybe there was one in Dragon magazine?), we could probably add more about what those reviews say to the reception section. RPGnet is blocked for me here, but I could look at it later, and I don't have White Dwarf magazine to look at.
351:
I added what
Dungeon mag said. I just quoted the whole thing. We'll probably want to summarize it, but I figured everyone might want to see it in its entirety. I always figured the top 30 list was just a list, but it's got fat paragraphs for 30 through 6, mulitpe paragraphs for 5 through 2, and I
190:
Hopefully I did a good job, there. Not sure how helpful a rules explanation would be, given I really couldn't say how the rules changes would have affected the play of the module itself. :) Probably not much of a difference, that is; saying what edition of the rules were used places the module more
174:
I can do some of this at the moment, though, especially the quick things. First of all, "way-laid" isn't anywhere near as good as it sounds. ;) Merriam
Webster defines "to lie in wait for or attack from ambush", so I'd say in this case the merchants and guards were not the ones doing the waylaying,
265:
Not a problem. I work on these articles, and it can be really hard to find sources. If this passes, I think we may need to think about merging some of these articles. This one is part of a series of 14, for instance. Ideally, I'd like to see this one as a GA, and then we can think about which
940:
Excellent! In Dec 2007 this article was tagged for deletion by some over zealous deletionists. Since then a lot of people a lot of people have worked on it to get from deleted status to GA. Great job everyone. And when someone asks how long an article edit needs to be, then let this be an
977:, and almost failed... when the article actually got deleted! However, the deletion was overturned at DRV, which is why we are able to be here today with it. :) You could say I was trying to prove a point myself by nominating it for GA, and I think I succeeded this time. ;)
225:
You may want to specify a minimum size, if you think there is one. It can be very hard to find reliable sources that discuss these D&D adventure articles, and this is probably close to as big as it can get. If it's too small, we can work on some alternative. -
246:
There is no minimun size. I am sorry that I gave that impression. I was trying to inspire the editors to add more content to this article as it does not seem comprehensive, but that was a poor choice on my part!
388:
The best part about the GA review process is that a good reviewer will ask you a lot of things that you may not have thought of yourself. :) Good call on adding the
Dungeon text, but yes we shouldn't list the
956:
393:
thing; I completely forgot how that article actually includes useful text, so I'll have to see if I can dig out a copy! As for WD, I agree completely; see if you can dig out a few useful tidbits.
81:
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I am going to run through it as I noticed a few copy editing issues I can take care of for you. However, I did want to give the following comments:
66:
370:
I'm feeling a little lazy about typing it, but White Dwarf #40 also has a very detailed review. It's not favorable, so would make a good juxtaposition to the
Dungeon review. -
62:
47:
39:
207:
I'm just throwing out suggestions which may or may not be good. But the article is only 828 words "readable prose size", not that I am counting!:) —
319:
It strikes me that since the material from the reviews was brought up at the AFD as a criticism, so that's something we can and should fix now.
903:
550:
504:
379:
361:
342:
275:
235:
292:
We'll do what we can - certainly agree that we'd like to have more, but not sure about what can be expanded enough. We have other module GAs (
630:
624:
955:
I concur! Although it's worth noting that the AFD was started by someone who didn't want the article to be deleted, not be deletionists.
304:) that might give us some clues about what we can do here. Those three have had followup material that Dwellers may not have had, though.
55:
17:
833:
716:
420:
I have the WD and will see what I can add later. I think I have lost my copy of the damn module :((( searched for a few days now.
431:
32:
894:
Thank you. This GAN review has been helpful in a number of ways. Also, thank you for your copyedit of the article. -
657:
470:
899:
546:
500:
375:
357:
338:
271:
231:
682:
352:
giant full page #1 (Queen of the
Spiders). Mattisse making us look a little harder is really going to pay off. -
293:
941:
example. Afterall isn't the goal to get good, usefull information here and not on someone else's timeline?
481:), and (s)he is still pseudo-active. I'll add a note at the talk page to see if more info can be provided. -
895:
542:
496:
371:
353:
334:
267:
227:
946:
541:
Mattisse asked on the talk page (in the wrong section) if we're ready to go. What do you think? -
1004:
986:
968:
950:
935:
921:
907:
823:
614:
600:
568:
554:
536:
522:
508:
490:
454:
435:
402:
383:
365:
346:
328:
313:
279:
260:
239:
220:
200:
184:
166:
148:
133:
1000:
964:
931:
610:
596:
518:
486:
425:
297:
256:
216:
144:
129:
120:
The article is well written, especially the "Plot" section. My concern is its comprehensiveness —
992:
974:
90:
The article is very short. Perhaps you could expand it by explaining a little more. For exampe:
175:
but were in fact the subjects thereof. :) I'll get some more explanations going, where I can.
772:
116:
Not sure what "waylaid" means in "Most of the waylaid merchants and guards have been killed,"
847:
103:
since it was for the first edition "rules", maybe you could explain how the rules differed.
942:
464:
301:
702:
996:
982:
960:
927:
917:
606:
588:
564:
532:
514:
482:
450:
421:
398:
324:
309:
248:
208:
196:
180:
162:
140:
121:
157:
Thanks! I probably won't have time to look into this tonight, but hopefully soon.
460:
978:
913:
560:
528:
446:
394:
320:
305:
192:
176:
158:
587:
Let me know when you think you are finish. Great progress so far! —
991:
Fortunately, you may have been making a point, but you weren't
445:#16, or did someone else (WebWarlock maybe?) add that one?
441:
I thought it was in your garage? :) Do you have a copy of
478:
74:
43:
266:
ones we may need a merge so they can meet the GAC. -
106:
maybe explain a little about the concept of "modules"
113:
Also, is there not more available under "Reception"?
333:I'll try and check White Dwarf and Dragon mag. -
890:Congratulations! 03:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
191:into a historical context then anything else.
8:
973:Indeed. The nominator was trying to prove a
832:(images are tagged and non-free images have
513:Great! That section looks much better now. -
559:Sure; an updated re-review is a good idea.
139:Thanks; I'll take a look into these soon. -
959:got rather interesting because of that. -
993:disrupting Knowledge (XXG) to make it
7:
18:Talk:Dwellers of the Forbidden City
827:, where possible and appropriate.
24:
876:
853:
839:
808:
784:
781:Fair representation without bias
757:
747:
722:
708:
694:
663:
649:
495:I added the White Dwarf info. -
1:
912:Thank you for the review. :)
756:: Remains focused on subject
1005:16:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
987:16:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
969:15:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
951:15:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
936:15:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
922:06:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
908:03:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
877:
854:
840:
809:
785:
758:
748:
723:
709:
695:
664:
650:
615:02:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
601:00:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
569:01:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
555:01:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
537:00:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
523:00:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
509:00:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
491:22:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
455:22:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
436:22:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
403:21:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
384:21:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
366:21:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
347:20:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
329:19:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
314:13:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
280:05:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
261:05:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
240:05:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
221:05:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
201:04:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
185:04:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
167:03:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
149:02:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
134:02:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
1033:
527:Yep, a much better read.
459:Hope you find the book!
707:: Sources are reliable
639:reasonably well written
97:ready-to-play adventure
846:(appropriate use with
821:It is illustrated by
773:neutral point of view
737:broad in its coverage
605:I think it's ready. -
834:fair use rationales
746:: Sets the context
693:: Well referenced
678:factually accurate
298:Dragons of Despair
848:suitable captions
805:No edit wars etc.
100:tournament module
1024:
896:Peregrine Fisher
880:
879:
857:
856:
843:
842:
812:
811:
788:
787:
761:
760:
751:
750:
726:
725:
712:
711:
703:reliable sources
698:
697:
667:
666:
653:
652:
593:
543:Peregrine Fisher
497:Peregrine Fisher
475:Different Worlds
443:Different Worlds
372:Peregrine Fisher
354:Peregrine Fisher
335:Peregrine Fisher
268:Peregrine Fisher
253:
228:Peregrine Fisher
213:
126:
79:
70:
51:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1023:
1022:
1021:
770:It follows the
744:(major aspects)
648:: Well written
589:
302:Tomb of Horrors
249:
209:
122:
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1030:
1028:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
957:The discussion
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
701:(citations to
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
662:: Follows MoS
633:for criteria)
620:
619:
618:
617:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
368:
285:
284:
283:
282:
244:
243:
242:
204:
203:
172:
171:
170:
169:
152:
151:
118:
117:
114:
110:
109:
108:
107:
104:
101:
98:
92:
91:
87:
86:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1029:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
971:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
953:
952:
948:
944:
939:
938:
937:
933:
929:
925:
924:
923:
919:
915:
911:
910:
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
892:
891:
882:
881:
874:
871:
870:
868:
865:
859:
858:
851:
849:
837:
835:
829:
828:
826:
825:
820:
814:
813:
806:
803:
802:
800:
796:
790:
789:
782:
779:
778:
776:
774:
769:
763:
762:
755:
745:
741:
740:
738:
734:
728:
727:
720:
718:
706:
704:
692:
688:
687:
685:
684:
679:
675:
669:
668:
661:
659:
647:
643:
642:
640:
636:
635:
634:
632:
628:
626:
616:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
598:
594:
592:
586:
585:
570:
566:
562:
558:
557:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
539:
538:
534:
530:
526:
525:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
466:
462:
458:
457:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
433:
430:
427:
423:
404:
400:
396:
392:
387:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
367:
363:
359:
355:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:
330:
326:
322:
317:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
281:
277:
273:
269:
264:
263:
262:
258:
254:
252:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
212:
206:
205:
202:
198:
194:
189:
188:
187:
186:
182:
178:
168:
164:
160:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
146:
142:
138:
137:
136:
135:
131:
127:
125:
115:
112:
111:
105:
102:
99:
96:
95:
94:
93:
89:
88:
84:
83:
82:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
889:
872:
866:
845:
831:
822:
804:
798:
780:
771:
753:
743:
736:
714:
700:
691:(references)
690:
681:
677:
655:
645:
638:
622:
621:
590:
474:
473:) added the
467:
442:
428:
419:
390:
250:
210:
173:
123:
119:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
943:Web Warlock
44:visual edit
683:verifiable
926:Thanks! -
873:Pass/Fail
754:(focused)
477:ref (see
294:Ravenloft
27:GA Review
997:Drilnoth
961:Drilnoth
928:Drilnoth
904:contribs
721:: No OR
607:Drilnoth
591:Mattisse
551:contribs
515:Drilnoth
505:contribs
483:Drilnoth
471:contribs
432:contribs
422:Casliber
380:contribs
362:contribs
343:contribs
276:contribs
251:Mattisse
236:contribs
211:Mattisse
141:Drilnoth
124:Mattisse
85:Comments
867:Overall
783:: NPOV
646:(prose)
67:history
48:history
34:Article
824:images
799:stable
797:It is
775:policy
735:It is
676:It is
637:It is
627:review
623:Final
975:point
629:(see
461:Pak21
391:whole
76:Watch
16:<
1001:talk
983:talk
965:talk
947:talk
932:talk
918:talk
900:talk
680:and
631:here
611:talk
597:Talk
565:talk
547:talk
533:talk
519:talk
501:talk
487:talk
479:diff
465:talk
451:talk
426:talk
399:talk
376:talk
358:talk
339:talk
325:talk
310:talk
272:talk
257:Talk
232:talk
217:Talk
197:talk
181:talk
163:talk
145:talk
130:Talk
63:edit
40:edit
995:! -
979:BOZ
914:BOZ
902:) (
658:MoS
561:BOZ
549:) (
529:BOZ
503:) (
447:BOZ
395:BOZ
378:) (
360:) (
341:) (
321:BOZ
306:BOZ
274:) (
234:) (
193:BOZ
177:BOZ
159:BOZ
1003:)
985:)
967:)
949:)
934:)
920:)
906:)
875::
869::
852::
844:b
838::
830:a
807::
801:.
777:.
752:b
742:a
739:.
717:OR
713:c
699:b
689:a
686:.
654:b
644:a
641:.
625:GA
613:)
599:)
567:)
553:)
535:)
521:)
507:)
489:)
453:)
434:)
401:)
382:)
364:)
345:)
327:)
312:)
300:,
296:,
278:)
259:)
238:)
219:)
199:)
183:)
165:)
147:)
132:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
999:(
981:(
963:(
945:(
930:(
916:(
898:(
850:)
836:)
719:)
715:(
705:)
660:)
656:(
609:(
595:(
563:(
545:(
531:(
517:(
499:(
485:(
468:·
463:(
449:(
429:·
424:(
397:(
374:(
356:(
337:(
323:(
308:(
270:(
255:(
247:—
230:(
215:(
195:(
179:(
161:(
143:(
128:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.