3133:"Warned" is overstating it quite a bit; I was simply trying to raise the level of discourse, as I think it's almost never appropriate in mature conversation to talk about strangers by their first names even if "their screen presence leads to a sense of familiarity" to some. Even if it's arguably appropriate on talk pages versus mainspace, cultivating good practice in talk page space strikes me as a beneficial goal from a stylistic standpoint. Almost daily I have to correct inappropriate usage of given names in biographical articles and making exclusive surname usage a habit everywhere on Knowledge cannot hurt anyone. It certainly isn't a "warning", though. -
1005:(see recent edit) that context is immediately deleted. Seven days ago and for her entire life she has been described here as 'English'. Blunt was born in England to English parents with no American relatives whatsoever yet once again US-centric Knowledge has appropriated yet another nation's citizen. Numerous sources confirm Blunt only took citizenship for tax and visa purposes, sourced no less than from her own mouth and is extremely proud of being British but I see someone has deleted legitimate citations confirming this seemingly to hid the fact. I thought Knowledge was about verifiability based on sources, ihowever, it seems that is not the case.
4257:. She gained US citizenship in 2015. She has had notable activities as an American and in the US since then. It would be appropriate to describe her as an American actress as well as a British (or English) actress in the intro sentence now. I suggest changing the intro from "... is a British actress" to "... is an American and British actress". I would object to "British-American" as that can be interpreted as an ethnicity tag that includes the meaning of a type of American and she is much more than just that. The conjunction makes the equal importance of both nationalities clear.
4466:
2412:, for example, is commonly used to refer to Americans from Boston with Irish ancestry, even if they've never set foot in the latter. Blunt's situation is quite different: she was born and raised in the UK and is culturally British. It's just that she recently became a naturalized US citizen. So I don't think British-American (or English-American) works in her case. To be honest, I don't think calling her American works at all; citizenship alone says nothing about who that person is, other than that they hold a piece of paper from a government saying they belong. --
2913:
1301:
the US as a 5-year old from
Ireland she'd be an American actress of Irish decent/citizenship. That would be a no-brainer. But she came to the US after she started acting, in 2008 I believe, after leaving her residence in Canada. The thing is she has been granted US citizenship and for most people you would now be considered an American. The fact she holds dual citizenship just adds an extra layer. Lives in US, acts in US, citizenship in US... yes I think British-American actress probably works well in the lead.
31:
2904:
4870:
acted with... isn't this impressive?" Also again, if co-star names are required to understand a quotation about the reception of the film or a noteworthy pairing (like with
Krasinski, to whom she is married), it makes sense to include them. But if the content of what's being said can be understood without the inclusion of co-star names, then why are we including them? We are not, I repeat, the entertainment press. â
762:
4412:
3368:
1478:
4182:
if she has a
British father and American mother, or something. I believe itâs within Wiki rules that the lead nationality should be the nationality they identify as, and someone who has taken citizenship for apparently reluctant reasons doesnât come across as someone who âidentifiesâ as American to me. The fact her US citizenship in mentioned in her infobox is adequate enough for me
1531:
975:
98:
4233:
nationality descriptor (see Boris
Johnson and work down) - what matters, indeed all that matters, is how she is seen in RS. As Procrastinating has found, she is widely desribed as British. That this is the case, and with three of us now having observed this fact, overrides all of the WP:OR and WP:SYNTH set out above from other editors.
4910:, the film in which she had her breakthrough role, was opposite Meryl Streep is notable info. Mentioning any major names she co-starred with is also notable info. As well as director names. This is customary in all actor bio articles. If you disagree with that custom, which is also prevalent in other encyclopedias, discuss it at the
384:
English newspapers picked it up. Goodness, she just took the oath of citizenship, and this is being quoted everywhere. If you feel that the whole subject should be dropped, then get rid of the citizenship mention completely. But the can of worms is opened once that sentence is there. Also, as a neutral reminder
3018:
works if everyone is open minded. If everyone is just gonna be stubborn and not compromise then what's the point. Besides, even if you stated that the picture has nothing wrong with it (not unpleasant etc), can't her profile pic be updated as per the other infos? Is that such a bad thing to do for her?
4096:
probably because of Ms Bluntâs status as an international A-lister, is there a brouhaha about the issue, whether the majority of people agree or not. Iâve pretty much had my say or this subject now. If people like my comments, they like them. If they donât, they donât. All I have stated are the facts
4948:
Death of Queen
Elizabeth II Upon the death of Elizabeth II and the succession of Charles III, the General Council of the Bar wrote that all QC titles changed to KC "with immediate effect". This was not a matter of decision by the Bar Council, nor by the Crown Office. It is the automatic effect of the
4869:
Again, the mention of co-stars for the sole purpose of mentioning that those actors were also in the film is inappropriate in an article that is not about those films. It's "promo" because without a content-based rationale for including them, all it is really saying is "oh hey look at who this person
4810:
She herself did not state it was Leah in any of the sources you linked. The Vanity Fair video where she says yes to the question with "Leah" can be put down to not paying close attention to everything said in the question. The fact is she is on video stating that it's Laura. Other sources using Leah,
4272:
Most RS's refer to her solely as
British. Imo I don't think reluctant citizenship for tax purposes (src above) and minimal usage in RS is a good reason to change the labelling. However, it's been a year since I last reviewed this and perhaps RS has changed, so open to a change if RS's can be provided
4132:
On a different angle, I'm not sure why this is
British-American, it should just be British. Yes, she holds American nationality as of recent (in addition to her British one). An article claims she was reluctant to take this (and it was mainly for visa and tax reasons). IMDb still refers to her solely
4063:
Just a reminder about
Knowledge discussions: opinions about the subject (e.g. British is too general) or unsubstantiated statements (e.g. lots of other articles do this) are not of any worth. Knowledge discussions and articles are about verified content only. If you want to share your personal biases
2430:
Yeah, that was the point I was making in my initial comment; plus, my (possibly incorrect) understanding is that
Knowledge's policy on a person's nationality where it's changed is that it's listed as their nationality when they became well known. As it is, I still say it's entirely misleading in its
1300:
Maybe not the exact words of "American citizen" but
English-American actress would work (or British-American). She was born in England but she also has American citizenship. She lived in Los Angeles for years but has since moved to New York. She's in many US-based tv shows and films. If she'd come to
544:
So far there is only one person complaining about your addition and you have every right to boldly add it. The sources including the British press didn't look at it as a joke. And her untruthfulness about renouncing her allegiance to Queen Elizabeth is also wiki worthy. I thought Lapadite77 and I had
383:
Boy do we disagree on this. If mentioning that she became an American citizen on such-and-such a date is fair, then mentioning and giving three very legitimate sources on her saying it was a terrible mistake, and that she lied about renouncing her allegiance to Queen Elizabeth, is also fair. Even the
4905:
That's incorrect. It is Knowledge custom to mention co-leads when an actor is co-starring, and to mention any notable lead star(s) if the actor is playing a supporting role or is part of an ensemble of major actors. In an actor's early work section, if they performed alongside major names it is also
3601:
In tennis terms, you may be right. But Emily Blunt is an actress and many actors are referred to as English, Scottish, Welsh, etc as opposed to British. I donât know why, but they are. My main reason for bringing this up wasnât to be a pedant, but to question the apparent reasoning in her source box
3193:
if Calling Ms Blunt by her first name seemed to offend some guideline sure. Then i will refer Ms Emily Blunt as Ms Blunt. Again never heard of such conditions when it comes to discussion page so noted. My whole point was to find a licence free and nicer image to update on this site plain and simple,
1805:
only her American husband's citizenship. No American involved in her blood. She is 100% English blood from head to toe. Don't try to put something into her blood. even though She holds a dual citizenship. This is about Nationality, not Citizenship. You American editors please stop trying to change a
1103:
I agree with the OP to an extent (I randomly watch this article, among ~4,000 other pages). The situation is more complex than can be explained with a simple label. If it can be explained in half a sentence in the lead then I'd suggest doing that (sod the MoS, it's a guideline not gospel); otherwise
294:
There also seems to be a problem with even mentioning her citizenship and carefree/attacking attitude in obtaining it. The info about her citizenship (all of it) is either ok to be here or not ok to be here. You can't take away part of the whole, especially when it's all sourced. The whole paragraph
258:
For a number of statements about Blunt's career, a single yahoo.com web page identified as a biography of her is the only cite. When I open that page, even if I enable Javascript in my browser, I see no biography: there's just a photo gallery and a lot of links to other articles and advertisements.
4865:
I didn't edit-war over former and latter. I made a change, you reverted it, and I let that reversion stand. "The last of these" is inarguably more complex than just listing the name of the film. Funny how you argue that including a co-star's name or two is fine if done in moderation, but God forbid
4181:
Procrastinating Reader: Personally, I agree with you. Many other famous people who have been citizens for a lot longer and have lived in America longer than they have the UK are listed simply as English (or whatever their native country is), but people on here want her listed as British-American as
3990:
So if several people are saying it should be British rather than English, then why are most actors listed on Wiki as English? This is a question Iâve asked you before, but not answered. Are we going to change all their bios to âBritishâ as well? English, British, English-American, British-American,
3918:
Well, fyunck, youâre clearly making a big deal out of it, as are many others, hence my response, and I have said as such before. The question is, before her US citizenship, was she on here as British or English? I look at fellow actors Paul Bettany and Minnie Driver on here who have simply shuffled
2271:
Since I've been "advised" by an admin to discuss it here, I guess I should do so. AFAICT she's not American, doesn't identify as American and is listed as British elsewhere e.g. IMDB; I was also under the impression that it was Knowledge's policy to identify someone as the nationality they're best
1690:
I understand that She has American citizenship, but She's not actually American. She still has her original prestigious and glorious British Citizenship. She was born in London to her high-class English parents and from the British nobility politician elite class famous socialite family. and She is
1057:
Blunt became notable in the UK, only much later did she become notable in the US, subsequently, the lede should add context, stating that she is English or British and that Emily has recently taken US citizenship for the reasons as stated by her, cited from legitimate sources. Blunt has stated that
857:
With respect, I have not offered any original research. I cited two of the many reputable sources available that support my correction of what is an error of fact on the Emily Blunt page. I declared a conflict of interest because my friendship with Joanna Blunt was the reason why I took the time to
483:
Yes, but right now it's a content dispute about Emily Blunt, and whether to include her well sourced views about her citizenship, and that should be handled on her talk page. If the talk page doesn't seem to settle it, then we always have other avenues. We know how we both feel about it, and others
4345:
No, WP turns to sources in all cases, not just âedge casesâ. Any other way of establishing a fact - including a lot of the discussion above - is OR, or OR by synthesis. If acquiring an additional citizenship doesnât change the way someoneâs nationality is seen by reliable sources, then we follow
4232:
are right, and s/he is the only person who has followed WP policy and looked to see how she is described in reliable sources. Everyone else above is engaging in OR by trying to decide themselves how she should be described. The fact of dual citizenship doesnât (necessarily) force a change in the
4005:
There is a big difference between being known as only "English" or being known as "British-American." You would want the two hyphened terms to be equals. As opposed to English-Californian. Or London-French. British is the term used rather than UK-American. This was mentioned in an answer to you by
3616:
I was looking at the Project Britain resource. Per their data: Most people in Scotland say they are Scottish rather than British, most people in Wales say they are Welsh rather than British, however most people in England say they are British rather than English. Americans also tend to do the same
2673:
Iâm not the person to explain. Itâs you that need to explain on your edit, Why you expect me to explain When You didnât explain anything in the first page. You just edited it for personal reasons to how you like it. Now You need to expian How Titles are not necessary for such Notable Famous People
2513:
The article states, "In 2015, Blunt placed 98th in FHM's Sexiest Women of 2015." I'm not sure how this relates to her personal life. If it merits consideration as valuable input about her, perhaps it should be added to the separate article, "List of awards and nominations received by Emily Blunt."
1210:
I see this is still not settled, and there has been edit warring on the subject. The page has now been protected to stop the warring. That means it is time to discuss the matter here so that a concensus can be arrived at. Sniping in edit sumarries is not a discussion. Edit warring is wrong even if
642:
Not everyone has their date stamp on when they became a citizen. Not everyone is a celebrity that is forced to make a public apology about their statements. This has tuned into a pretty big deal for her and her career... enough to apologize. Certainly if everyone here feels this can't be added, we
5192:
on the inclusion of in-laws in the infobox. The politician uncle and brother-in-law actor listed in the infobox are not relevant to the actress's notability, and there doesn't appear to be a consensus that in-laws should be included in the infobox. Likewise, the actress shouldn't be listed in the
4162:
Why is Knowledge choosing to title her as British-American? There are no reliable sources for this. The source given on the page itself is an article that discusses her acquiring American nationality (the source given does not refer to her as British-American, though). It seems a Knowledge editor
4095:
If you also read my comment from a few paragraphs ago, youâll also see Iâve cited examples of others who have been changed to English-American without any debate. And Iâve seen many other people on here as English-American (or Scottish-American) without so much as a murmur. But only on this page,
3651:
Donât know where youâve got that information from, but as an Englishman myself I can categorically say the vast majority of English people do not think that. It is true that a lot of us are proud to be British, but many of us identify as English first, like I do. I can honestly say in my 33 years
2551:
I have read through the above, and it is very confusing, and very complex, I cannot see a clear point where the consensus is either for or against, on this being the case, I see a clear discussion on mentioning her citizenship, and clear discussion on "English-born American" but nothing really on
1004:
This is now getting beyond a joke, Blunt who categorically stated she took citizenship only for tax purposes and to alleviate her visa issues is now being described as 'English-American' as though she has been so all her life, there is no context. However, the moment anyone seemingly adds context
4890:
because writing a good biography isn't just a boring collection of X did Y. Also, it's funny that you don't extend this PROMO reading to the mention of directors and reviewers (no thoughts of ""oh hey look at who this person was directed by... isn't this impressive?" or ""oh hey look at who this
3800:
Thing is though, had Emily Blunt not become an American citizen, she would almost certainly be listed on here as English rather than British, just the overwhelming majority of Hollywood actors are. Yet now she has US citizenship, she has to be listed as âBritish-Americanâ, as if the fact she was
3017:
I've no idea what edit warring is in the first place as I'm new here. How this whole "warring" started was that the picture i've changed kept getting reverted. My intention was never to start a "edit war" but simply to update her picture as mentioned in the discussion. Once again discussion only
2774:
Emily Bluntâs residence was stated as Chelsea, London while her husband John Krasinskiâs is stated as New York. I deleted her âResidenceâ as this was misleading as it was suggesting they live apart even though they are still happily married at time of writing. Yet I have had my edits reverted as
4884:
Yes, we aren't the entertainment press, but unless there is policy that explicitly states that the names of co-actors should not be mentioned unless in the most dire of needs, you cannot call it a PROMO-violation. If a mere neutral name mention makes you think "hey look at who this person acted
3522:
I understand a while ago, the consensus was to label her British-American rather than English-American. The source box said she couldnât be changed from British-American because English is not a nationality, British is. If this is why, then thatâs a very poor reason. Can someone confirm if this
1154:
I am reopening the discussion because the last consensus not to change it to this was that she did not consider herself a dual citizen, however she has stated, "... taking the oath was "really meaningful." "My two favorite people in the world are American, my husband and my daughter," she said,
612:
The recentism mention is being hypocritical. Her citizenship is also recent and when I tried to remove that, you put it back. You can't have it both ways. BLP is fine with it and we have multiple good sources about it (which it requires). Getting her citizenship and deriding her citizenship are
3063:
and follow encyclopedic guidelines) is really not terribly concerned, given her other obligations, about an arguably less flattering photograph of herself in this context and that this issue is not something that volunteers must wring their hands about "do for her" (as if she were our personal
2569:
The existing discussion which was held on the BLP page was focused exclusively on the inclusion of comments regarding a joke surrounding the acquisition of US citizenship, and not about describing Blunt as British-American. If this is not the correct discussion which has lead the above claimed
4291:
The nationality description in the intro is not really an issue for how the subject consideres herself or how other sources describe the subject, it is a Knowledge manual of style issue for how Knowledge bio articles describe the context of her notability. I understand that she is American by
3483:
Any particular reason we're using a low-res, out-of-focus image (the plane of focus seems to be on the detail of the front of her dress, for some reason) for the lead? Are all the other images worse... even if we have one a year or two older, an image of reasonable quality would be less of an
529:
Also, Ms Blunt lives off the public acclamation of her acting talents. When she makes controversial statements, the public reacts to those statements, as she is a public figure, her statements are part of the public record. They are well documented and presented in a neutral manner without
1394:
The source cited for the "English-born American" claim -- her website -- does not support that claim. It states clearly "British" as her nationality. So if her self-identification is relevant, she is British. The only other option, if nationality is stated at all, is to say that she has dual
468:
Never mind, just saw your revision. More input can be given there. Others, such as IPs, restoring the sensationalized comment doesn't necessarily support a need for it to be in article despite WP's policies. Those noticeboards are there to settle such content disputes. There's technically no
3102:
apply to talk pages as mentioned above? That was the impression I got from the comment, but I am not sure if I understood correctly. IMO, its very common for actors to be addressed by first names informally because their screen presence leads to a sense of familiarity for viewers, and since
1375:
However her infobox states she was born in "Wandsworth, London, United Kingdom", and the first line of her Early Life states "Blunt was born in Wandsworth, London." I don't see how someone could err in where she was born. Plus linking British-American would probably be overlinking anyways.
4158:
I could find on the first dozen Google pages for "Emily Blunt", other than Knowledge, refers to her as British, one as English. The exception being two sources (BBC and Mashable) that solely copy the Knowledge summary for her, hence using British-American due to Knowledge opting for that.
2599:
A comment from one of the paticipants " Then again if no other sources can be found then it should be removed entirely - A fan site doesn't cut it." Is hardly a ringing endorsement of the inclusion. The above RfC was in relation to the use of English-Born, and not on being labeled as
627:
Her citizenship is actually relevant to her biography. Everyone's citizenship is. We don't need to add to Knowledge every time someone gets upset about a joke. Unless Emily Blunt becomes known for years to come as "that person who made that stupid joke where...", it's insignificant.
3194:
hence i do know the 'Strict Guidelines' you referred to. Please note that the undertone of your reply is condescending (by choosing to nitpick my choice of word instead of seeing the bigger picture) and that's not the point of this open discussion. Thank you for your contribution.
295:
is either undue weight or it's not. It's either too early to bring it up or it's not. But she just became a citizen and she just said it might have been a terrible mistake, and also that she didn't mean it when saying she disavows the Queen. It's a package deal in my opinion.
1395:
nationality; American and British. English is irrelevant since it is not a nationality for these purposes (the same applies to Welsh, Scottish, and Northern Irish). Neither is "British-American"; it's not clear it's even a thing (I'm pretty sure there is no such nation as
1237:. You ca become a US citizen and still retain your former nationality, whcih she does. I would not object to British-American but English-born American is wrong, wrong, wrong. I have no doubt from the most cursory review on her statements on this that she would concur.
1030:
says "In most modern-day cases this will mean the country of which the person is a citizen, national or permanent resident, or if notable mainly for past events, the country where the person was a citizen, national or permanent resident when the person became notable."
3897:
It is a basic language thing. If you are going to make hyphenated compound (stating that both parts are equal), both parts should refer to the same equal concept. American refers to citizenship, so the other part should equally refer citizenship which in this case is
2965:
insists on keeping. I suggest replacing it with the left picture, i.e. Emily at the 2012 TIFF. And as per my original post, i mentioned any other nicer pictures are preferred. Hence please take note, plus that picture chosen prior isn't unflattering a tad bit. Thanks
278:
Any justification for this? I know she very recently got US citizenship, but it's pretty clear from the way she was talking about it she only got it to make her residency more secure (renewing a visa can be a pain in the ass) and not because she feels American.
574:? Celebrities say comments that are sensationalized by the media and/or criticized by a section of the population all the time. Everything said on social media is public record, that is not an argument. This has no encyclopedic significance. I refer to you to:
4636:
2832:
Hi everyone, i would like to change her main profile picture because its cropped awfully and its not a recent photo of her. Anyone else who is more equipped to change her picture and gain a consensus please go ahead and change it to a newer and nicer picture.
1768:
The Fact is She is nothing related to American. She is having an American boyfriend doesn't make her American. Stop putting American into her body when she has not single one american in her whole blood. Her home and Her parents are in London. End of Story
1128:. She has not renounced her British citizenship. The best solution is simply British-American. Emily Mortimer is described simply as British in her article, which I think probably is wrong and her commitment to the US is considerably more long-standing.
5106:
Britannica is a deprecated source, is it not? As would be another Knowledge. We rely on reliable sources, both from the general media (such as respected news media sites and publications from the English speaking world) and the specialist media press.
1339:
I would agree with English or British-American but the current wording English-born American is hopelessly wrong. She is dual nationality and still is dual nationality. Her British nationality should also be stated .. Same goes for Emily Mortimer etc.
447:, and I would suggest the same to you if someone else does it who isn't me. That would be edit warring on your part. If editors decide it here on this talk page that's also good enough. It doesn't need to go anywhere else if consensus is reached here.
3723:
Lots of opinions being given here but none make a reason for changing from British to English which is based on the verified sources only not editors' POV, which is not relevant. No reason provided for changing the previous consensus. It must stay as
2848:
Of the two recent photos, "Emily Blunt avp 2014 (headshot).jpg" is far better. She is looking the correct way and her head isn't half in shadow. I'm not saying it's the greatest pic in history, but it's better than "Emily Blunt Cannes 2015.jpg" imho.
5015:
as she has immigrated to, and lives in the United States. As of now she is a dual citizen, but resides and works in the US. Its less accurate to say just "British" than say just "American" as she is naturalized. I vote to make her "British-American"
4659:
She said in a interview that her middle name is Laura, not Leah. So, I think someone should change it. The interview is on YouTube, called 'Emily Blunt Interview', posted on April 2 of this year from a channel called 'Pop Star Extraordinaire Maya'.
873:
I've taken a look at your edit now, which is perfectly fine. Your OP here wasn't clear on whether you'd cited reliable sources. So yes the correction is properly cited (and supported by the cited reliable sources), so there's no issue here;
1366:) it states, "British-Americans are Americans whose ancestry originates wholly or partly in the United Kingdom (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland)" which could give the impression she was born in America with British ancestry.â
4310:
determinations. Imo the main reasons to label as another national fail here - for informational purposes we do have it in the infobox but I think "is an American and British actress" to be misleading and not in line with sources, either.
4197:
She has dual citizenship and lives in the USA, so it could say she is a British-born American actress also. It can be done so many ways. Personally I like what some articles do in this case and say she is a British and American actress.
2747:
This arcticle is about HER, she is from a Notable British Family, her grandfather, and her uncle and her dad are Notable and politicians, the titles are already included in ex commander of British Armed Forces Major General Peter Blunt
3319:
I don't think we need a full rfc thing here for a simple infobox pic. It looks like the original pic is not very popular and the wikimedia EmilyBluntTIFFSept2012.jpg (of which I posted two pics) is what is most liked (3 to 1 for choice
514:
Apologies, I was unaware of this discussion. I'm also unaware of what the controversy is. She made the statements, it was documented, and later she apologized for making them. Case closed, it is a part of the public record.
1691:
having a dual citizenship (British and American) but Her American citizenship is just a formality. Her Nationality is English and but Her Citizenship is just dual (British and American). so She is basically English(nationality)
5153:
1087:. Information cited "all over the internet" is not a criteria for inclusion unless a subset of that is high-quality sources with a strong track record of neutrality and accuracy. And frankly, www.gossipcop.com is not that.
1175:
She has never referred to herself as "American" and it's implied that she didn't want to do this but did for tax purposes. She is still English. She was born and raised in England. She still refers to herself as England.
3077:
That being said, I do think the existing photo is jarring in its remarkable unflatteringness, and the photo with "320566" in its filename would be the most undistracting-but-encyclopedic of the three choices. Thanks. -
1713:
Having American citizenship does make her an American. She has citizenship, she lives in America, she stars in American tv shows, American movies, has American children, and is married to an American. Therefore she is
3933:
I'm making a big deal out of it??? You have several people here saying it should stay British and only you saying it should be English. You are the only one making a "big deal" out of it. We are simply answering you.
561:
No, this is about an off-hand joke being encyclopedic content. Blunt publicly made a joke about the Republican debate & becoming a citizen the same day, it was predictably criticized by the right-wing, and she
5062:
Her citizenship is already fully set out in the article and infobox. The descriptor in the lead follows reliable sources, as for any article in WP, and the RS regularly describes her as a British actor/actress.
4346:
the sources, and note their citizenship within the article and infobox in the normal way. Cf. Robert De Niro, who is seen and rightly described as an American actor despite his having taken Italian citizenship.
3700:
heritage. This is the standard American interpretation of that kind of hyphenated label. That, however, is distinct from a person who holds dual citizenship. (There is even a whole article on the related epithet
807:
I'm hoping that this time my correction of Joanna's name will stick - I've known the Blunt family for 20 years and Emily's mum would really like to stop hearing from friends that her name is wrong on Knowledge!
4163:
simply decided to define her as British-American because she has acquired that nationality. Far more reliable sources call her British, I see no reason for Knowledge to make their own judgement on her status -
613:
either important or they are both undue. I also don't know why you would bring up right-wing crap. For all I know the left-wing is making a shrine for her. What does that matter? The sourcing is from all over.
1728:
because She is purely English Blood with English high-class root, Her Parents are Elite Socialite English, Her Home is in Hammersmith in west London the upper-class billionaire area the richest area on earth.
2102:
2431:
current form: "naturalised American citizen", especially one who was born, brought up and made a name for themselves elsewhere isn't what people tend to think of if someone is described as "American". --
4811:
likely just repeating the incorrect name other sources had, doesn't override the subject herself confirming her own name. We're not going to write "Blunt confirmed her correct middle name is Laura, but
3542:
is listed as a British tennis player not a Scottish tennis player, though he is from Scotland. We tend to use National entities such as US, Russian, German, British, etc, rather than regional entities.
3919:
over from English to English-American without any fuss. Yet with Emily Blunt, presumedly because sheâs that little bit more revered and popular, the pedantries of her nationality are such a big deal.
3115:
to the mess, and it gets even more murkier. Truth is that I have seen many discussions reference the subject by their first name, and none of them were warned as done here, which ignited my curiosity.
2790:
You're right. Iv'e removed her residence from the infobox unless it's absolutely clear where the couple currently live. In a recent interview with Stephen Colbert, she said that she lives in New York.
566:(stating, "It was just an off-hand joke. I think I'll probably leave the political jokes to late-night or something.") Yes, case closed. Now, why would this be in an encyclopedia â not a tabloid, or a
723:
673:
1730:
1963:
1400:
4969:
4696:
3504:
1724:
Having American Citizenship doesn't make her American. Clearly She has no single low-class American blood in her body. She doesnt have stupid american accent. She speaks with her English accent.
1756:
OK, this isn't the place for you to you to launch attacks on Americans. So I'm done here, if you want to change the description, get consensus through an RfC, if not, I'll report you. Good day.â
4906:
customary to mention those names, as that is significant info. Mentioning that Blunt played Judi Dench's granddaughter in her first professional acting job is notable info. Mentioning that
2272:
known as. To suggest she's "British-American" seems to be misinformation, not least as hyphenated-Americans are usually understood to be American-born people of a particular ancestry. --
2101:
I know this has been discussed, but the book People of Today 2017, edited by Lucy Hume, lists Blunt's mother's maiden name as Joanna Margaret Dixon. Her own father was a Robert Dixon. See
3561:
Who does? When the overwhelming majority of English people with Knowledge accounts are listed as English rather than British, you are clearly not speaking for the majority of Knowledge
3575:
They are? That's not following guidelines unless there is proof that is how they self-identify. In tennis bios we usually use British (as that topic is what I'm most familiar with).
417:, I suggest you don't restore (if you plan on doing) such edits - as those edits have been challenged and a discussion is taking place on the talk page - and take this matter to the
3448:", I guess I don't fully understand this, I edited pierce Brosnans page to "irish" as a result of it being the exact same situation. Just want to make sure I'm doing this correctly
4997:
Only if that is common in reliable sources. Whereas the RS mostly appear to describe her as a British actor/actress. The citizenship info is in the infobox and article already.
4292:
convenience, not allegiance, but she does live and have notable activities in the US as well sufficient to describe her as an American actress along with being a British actress.
4306:
We do turn to RS in edge cases, I gave an example of such a case above. And we do consider the subject's preferences in it, in fact that's often the main determining factor for
322:
418:
5202:
The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose ... wherever possible, present information in short form, and exclude any unnecessary content
4387:
This is already covered off in the article, and the discussion above reached the correct conclusion as regards the opening sentence - i.e that we follow the RS, as usual.
1794:
be able to be described as American through her recent citizenship, it's pretty misleading and seems to be more about appropriation than anything usefully encyclopaedic. â
563:
3801:âEnglishâ before means nothing and comes across as a bit abrupt. For that reason, I think she should be referred to as âEnglish-Americanâ rather than âBritish-Americanâ.
1156:
3447:
I see her listed as English but I understand she has become an american citizen, I seen in the edit page it says ""<!-Do not change without getting a consensus-: -->
3166:- Being totally honest I've always found the image weird ever since stumbling on this article, Anyway I would say one looks better slightly better, I wouldn't say it's
2001:
4779:
2622:
to "British actress with American citizenship". I think the current lead intro gives undue weight to her nationality as she's not notable for that but for her acting.
2308:
in the United States, suggesting the status helped her tax and visa situation. She said she felt conflicted over abandoning her sole allegiance to the United Kingdom.
2252:
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
2552:
British-American. If this can be pointed out then that would be helpful, as it is currently trying to be used as a precedent in another case, of similar contention.
1868:
545:
an understanding not to revert again so I left it as it was without my addition. Now Lapadite77 has reverted you too. I am no longer bound if he reverts you again.
2555:
I personally think that a set of these articles needs wider BLP discussion, on this issue as it is potentially very difficult to get right, and is very confusing.
1731:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3373044/Emily-Blunt-greeted-mother-father-star-flies-home-England-Christmas-husband-John-Krasinski-daughter-Hazel.html
2043:
2039:
2025:
1900:
1896:
1882:
1632:
1628:
1614:
2159:
5300:
1320:- no particular policy or strong particular on handling, but it just seems significant enough a part of the bio and of article content to get placement in the
2128:
422:
360:. Of course her becoming an American citizen should be in the BLP. As a neutral reminder, removing such info or adding the comment again would constitute
4785:
4715:
I don't know, but the article currently says one thing in the first sentence and Infobox, and another in the eraly life section. That needs to be fixed.
3833:
Muirofsara: âNo reason provided for changing the previous consensus. It must stay as British-Americanâ. You clearly didnât read the start of this thread
2618:. I see it was determined there was a "British-American" consensus but the lead states "is a British actress. She is now also an American citizen." I'll
4447:
4596:
So much edit warring in the past few hours re. the name of the subject, yet no further comments on talk or attempt to achieve consensus. Good editing.
2359:
5224:
4325:
If both are listed, it should be "is an British and American actress" rather than the other way around â she was British first, American second. --
3269:
2132:
4476:
that support the change you want to be made. Not sure what that instagram link is as from what I can tell she does not have an instagram account.
331:
3692:
I'd suggest we avoid the term "English-American" in favor of "English and American." In the U.S., at least, we have a long history of terms like "
328:
2991:
I see no reason why the current photo should be altered, there does not seem to be anything wrong with it. Also, you should not be edit warring;
4112:âOpinions on the subject?â âYour personal biases are what Twitter is for?â Whatâs the point in having a discussion section for Knowledge, then?
2877:
How is it "way more decent"? It's an unflattering side shot and there's no good reason to change it to that, when there's a better alternative.
3991:
she is all of them. Whatever the choice, I will respect it. But all Iâm doing is asking sensible, rational questions. Sorry for the âbig dealâ
5200:
is presenting the "key facts" of the subject of the article, and the names in the parameter aren't key facts of the subject. The MOS states: "
1441:
It should be "British-American", Then again if no other sources can be found then it should be removed entirely - A fan site doesn't cut it. â
336:
Her American citizenship is a notable/significant event and encyclopedic info. A random, sensationalized comment isn't; particularly not in a
3753:
1776:
1347:
1244:
1135:
4213:
I think "British-born American" puts too much emphasis on the "American". She's basically English, with British and American nationality. --
5138:
4214:
1187:
1012:
310:
280:
1580:
4680:
She is English, i find it strange how it's only English actresses that are ever classified as British never the Scottish or Welsh actors
1053:
notable mainly for past events, the country where the person was a citizen, national or permanent resident when the person became notable
4681:
2517:
2408:
is typically used with regard to people who were born and raised in the US, with their heritage being traceable to some other location.
1159:
955:
913:
260:
178:
5253:(2011), but there is nothing about the movie in this article, which I'm pretty angry about because that movie is one of my favourites.
1967:
1404:
5254:
4973:
4700:
4065:
3508:
2755:
2681:
2651:
2461:
1813:
906:
Is she British? I saw her on TV in an interview the other day and her accent was American. I suppose she could be a method actress...
83:
2002:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110302221915/http://www.debretts.com/people/biographies/browse/b/7803/Oliver%20Simon%20Peter+BLUNT.aspx
4496:
Her full name may well be Emily Olivia Laura Blunt, but we would need a reliable source first and Twitter is not a reliable source.
3116:
2021:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1878:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1739:
1698:
796:
4808:"People get my name wrong on Knowledge. They say my name is Emily Olivia Leah Blunt, but it's not, it's Emily Olivia Laura Blunt."
1869:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160821020923/http://www.birminghampost.co.uk/whats-on/film-tv/emily-blunt-doing-dishes-helps-3911796
5273:
4937:
4756:
4277:-- I don't think it makes sense to ignore the subject's preferences and RS commentary and label for solely economic citizenship.
2490:
1095:
4767:
2114:
4443:
Her name is wrong. It is posted as Emily Olivia Leah Blunt. Her name is Emily Olivia Laura Blunt. Please change Leah to Laura.
4316:
4282:
3265:
3103:
discussions on the talk page arenât really part of the article, it wouldnât really cause harm to anyone. I may be wrong due to
780:
575:
4601:
4587:
4172:
3468:
3285:
3272:(currently used for infobox). It has better lighting for her face and she looks happier there than in what's used right now.
2110:
2005:
831:
772:
1051:
In most modern-day cases this will mean the country of which the person is a citizen, national or permanent resident, or if
1852:
1282:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3709:, where users settled on a label in the vein of this same suggestion ("Irish and American" rather than "Irish-American").
3617:
thing. Of course Americans also tend to say England when we mean UK or Great Britain (we're pretty sloppy on that issue).
2584:
Everybody who commented on the RFC above agreed that British-American was okay. I don't know how it could be any clearer.
2310:
1872:
1464:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
5219:
That all sounds logical inandof itself, but feels icky to do so right around when one of the previously-cited relatives,
4167:. I believe this argument, thorough and backed with reliable sources, is complete and valid enough to support the change.
2330:
2300:
121:
4331:
2605:
2575:
2560:
2086:
1943:
1675:
594:. The only encyclopedic information is the naturalized citizenship. But again, I'm all for requesting more input on the
76:"She is currently not in a relationship with Michael BublĂŠ." This piece of information is weird, it should be deleted.
3430:
2167:
4448:
https://instagram.com/stories/badpostblunt/3072979749157507331?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY=
691:
My opinion is this: leave it out. The woman apologized for what she said was an "offhand" joke. It's merely trivia.
5188:
says that the parameter is only for relatives that are "independently notable and particularly relevant". Also, see
3463:
Dual nationality is a thing. Gaining a new citizenship doesn't really change the matter, nor replace the prior one.
325:
4473:
4312:
4278:
3905:
3307:
3254:
3199:
3023:
2971:
2868:
2838:
2536:
38:
2143:
article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
2011:
4597:
4583:
4229:
4168:
3757:
3464:
3142:
3087:
2992:
2106:
1351:
1248:
1139:
696:
314:
2042:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1899:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1631:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1155:
referring to her and Krasinksi's 1-year-old daughter Hazel. "It was kind of a special day. Yeah, it was great."
4218:
3001:
2695:"Titles" for "Notable Famous People"? What does that even mean? This article is not about her relatives. Their
2479:
2139:'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for
1962:
article as another option in the nationality issue. Hayek is described quite simply as "Mexican and American".
1780:
1191:
284:
5142:
1016:
4454:
3871:
I think someone mentioned above that we go by sourcing. It seems most sourcing uses British-American such as
3453:
2521:
1163:
959:
917:
264:
182:
5258:
5185:
4685:
4519:
4501:
4418:
4297:
4262:
4203:
4069:
4039:
4011:
3939:
3888:
3622:
3580:
3548:
3489:
3374:
3333:
3233:
2933:
2854:
2601:
2571:
2556:
2077:
1993:
1934:
1844:
1817:
1666:
1572:
1484:
1381:
1306:
1215:
have consensus, so keep that in mind when the protction expires or blocks will be issued. I suggest that an
827:
776:
710:
648:
618:
550:
489:
452:
405:
300:
3880:
3303:
3250:
3195:
3120:
3019:
2967:
2864:
2834:
2810:
1743:
1702:
863:
813:
790:
348:
because the off hand comment (which you deemed "bashing") was removed from the article does not conform to
4954:
4847:
3404:
2759:
2685:
2645:
2457:
2231:
1989:
87:
4875:
4450:
4377:
4307:
3960:
My preference is for English as British is too general. She comes from England therefore sheâs English.
3682:
3449:
3337:
3291:
3222:
2912:
2842:
2731:
2532:
2061:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2049:
1918:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1906:
1650:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1638:
1516:
Consensus has been reached to describe her as British-American, can you update the article? Thank you!
1329:
1113:
963:
633:
243:
4950:
4802:
The channel name is irrelevant, the source is Emily Blunt herself, the primary source on her own name.
4537:
Absolutely. Note the editor who added this also provided some links to legal documents, these are also
3400:
2641:
2216:
1992:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1843:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1581:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130307153737/http://movies.yahoo.com:80/person/emily-blunt/biography.html
1571:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
484:
may chime in or edit it themselves and pretty much take us out of it. That's the way it usually works.
1325:
859:
823:
809:
786:
5165:
5097:
5053:
5035:
5021:
4627:
4561:
4538:
4164:
4084:
3965:
3775:
3743:
3729:
3190:
3135:
3080:
2751:
2696:
2677:
2627:
2389:
2210:
1809:
1772:
1735:
1694:
1605:
1343:
1240:
1224:
1131:
1093:
1036:
1008:
951:
909:
891:
847:
743:
729:
692:
681:
603:
535:
520:
474:
430:
373:
210:
174:
131:
79:
4372:
Per MOSBIO, we should include her nationality(s) in the lead sentence. OK, what do editors think? --
4020:
I'm sorry... was there any objection to my proposal of "British and American" per my reasons above?
5112:
5068:
5002:
4911:
4896:
4855:
4644:
4392:
4351:
4238:
3766:
Since there has been an objection to the edit carried out in the format suggested above of British
3702:
3348:
3218:
3052:
3045:
2996:
2882:
2818:
2795:
2704:
2663:
2498:
2475:
2256:
583:
5189:
4815:
uses Leah" because secondary sources are not the authority on the subject's name, the subject is.
4183:
4113:
4097:
3992:
3920:
3857:
3834:
3802:
3653:
3603:
3562:
3524:
2776:
5209:
5197:
4919:
4820:
4739:
4665:
4532:
4515:
4497:
4481:
4293:
4258:
4199:
4035:
4007:
3935:
3884:
3652:
Iâve never met anyone face-to-face who has actively said that prefer to be British than English
3618:
3576:
3544:
3485:
3329:
3279:
3243:
3229:
2958:
2929:
2850:
1790:
I was rather surprised to see her described as "British-American" in the lead. Although she may
1377:
1302:
1067:
706:
644:
614:
546:
485:
461:
448:
414:
401:
341:
296:
5249:
3876:
2046:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1903:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1635:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
4137:
3055:. We imagine Blunt (if you know her well enough in real life to call her "Emily", please read
2062:
1919:
1651:
5281:
5232:
5157:
5012:
4988:
4938:
https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/barristers-register/A2386207891BDB25739C1ABCAB488AAC.html
4793:
4720:
4512:
4187:
4117:
4101:
4025:
3996:
3924:
3861:
3838:
3806:
3770:
American, I am simply editing the article as "British-American" in line with the references.--
3714:
3696:-American" referring to someone who is American by citizenship but also identifies with their
3657:
3607:
3566:
3528:
2863:
is it possible for someone to change it completely to something else that is way more decent.
2813:
instead of edit-warring, please describe why you want to change the infobox image. Thank you.
2780:
2454:
2436:
2277:
2185:
1425:
1181:
875:
1862:
4871:
4839:
4373:
4335:
3678:
2727:
2335:
2305:
1584:
1363:
1105:
987:
933:
733:
705:
Actually she only apologized for part of it. But heck the apology made it even bigger news.
629:
357:
239:
110:
47:
17:
2069:
1926:
1658:
1266:
This RfC was closed because consensus was reached to describe her as a British-American. â
5161:
5093:
5049:
5045:
5031:
5017:
4943:
4843:
4623:
4557:
4080:
3961:
3771:
3739:
3725:
3677:
So why can't it be English-American? Was she an American citizen when she started acting.
3424:
3210:
3098:
Not really related to this, but just out of curiosity: do Manual of Style guidelines like
2719:
2623:
2589:
2465:
2244:
2202:
2153:
2006:
http://www.debretts.com/people/biographies/browse/b/7803/Oliver%20Simon%20Peter+BLUNT.aspx
1511:
1220:
1088:
1032:
887:
843:
739:
677:
599:
587:
567:
531:
516:
470:
442:
426:
387:
369:
206:
145:
126:
4803:
948:
Can someone add in short section on her appearance in the second series of Foyle's War?
4891:
person was reviewed by... isn't this impressive?" this time?), but only to her co-star.
4859:
4766:
reliable source than "Pop Star Extraordinaire") that it's "Leah". Other RSes, including
4034:
I have no issue with "British and American" but your original proposal didn't say that.
1853:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121019121618/http://stutteringtreatment.org/aboutstaff.php
259:
If other people see the same thing, then we need better sources for these statements. --
5108:
5064:
4998:
4892:
4851:
4640:
4388:
4347:
4254:
4234:
4146:
3902:
3344:
3247:
3214:
3171:
3014:
2962:
2903:
2878:
2814:
2791:
2715:
2700:
2659:
2619:
2494:
2253:
2028:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1885:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1873:
http://www.birminghampost.co.uk/whats-on/film-tv/emily-blunt-doing-dishes-helps-3911796
1757:
1715:
1617:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1544:
1520:
1442:
1367:
1321:
1288:
1267:
595:
591:
349:
2068:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1925:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1657:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1158:
Therefore I think it should be included in the lead sentence that she is an American.
1058:
she is very proud to be British and this should be her nationality until such time as
5294:
5220:
5205:
4915:
4816:
4750:
4735:
4661:
4637:
Knowledge:Errors in the EncyclopĂŚdia Britannica that have been corrected in Knowledge
4477:
3706:
3705:.) For a precedent, we can look at other pages where we've had similar debates, like
3273:
3104:
3056:
2723:
2417:
1216:
1084:
1063:
579:
393:
361:
337:
313:, you're referring to the tongue-in-cheek comment Emily Blunt made, humor evident in
225:
70:
4273:
for this. There does need to be a certain amount of logic in the labelling, though,
3856:
This conversation seems to have stalled. Could someone reply to my comment, please?
1856:
5277:
5228:
5080:
4984:
4789:
4773:
4716:
4573:
4544:
4149:
4021:
3872:
3710:
3302:
I agree! Let's get more people to reply and then we shall proceed with the change.
3228:
To be honest, I like the two I posted much better. That one is too cropped for me.
3108:
2432:
2273:
1795:
1420:
1080:
839:
835:
425:
if you feel so strongly about it. We should get clarification and consensus there.
397:
365:
353:
229:
163:
4556:
Elle is a reliable source, so yes. Birth records only show Emily Olivia L Blunt.
3399:
Add upcoming role as Invisible woman in upcoming movie Marvel's Avengers:Endgame
5285:
5262:
5236:
5213:
5169:
5146:
5116:
5101:
5072:
5057:
5039:
5025:
5006:
4992:
4977:
4958:
4936:
Queen Elizabeth II is dead. Emily Blunt's father is a KC. (Bar registry entry :
4923:
4900:
4879:
4824:
4797:
4743:
4724:
4704:
4689:
4669:
4648:
4631:
4605:
4591:
4565:
4551:
4523:
4505:
4485:
4458:
4422:
4396:
4381:
4355:
4340:
4326:
4320:
4301:
4286:
4266:
4242:
4222:
4207:
4191:
4176:
4143:
4121:
4105:
4088:
4073:
4043:
4029:
4015:
4000:
3969:
3943:
3928:
3909:
3892:
3865:
3842:
3810:
3779:
3761:
3747:
3733:
3718:
3686:
3661:
3626:
3611:
3584:
3570:
3552:
3539:
3532:
3512:
3493:
3472:
3457:
3437:
3408:
3378:
3352:
3311:
3258:
3237:
3203:
3183:
3148:
3124:
3112:
3099:
3093:
3060:
3027:
3004:
2975:
2937:
2886:
2872:
2858:
2822:
2799:
2784:
2763:
2735:
2708:
2689:
2667:
2631:
2609:
2593:
2579:
2564:
2540:
2525:
2502:
2483:
2469:
2440:
2421:
2398:
2281:
2261:
2136:
2121:
2091:
2035:
1985:
1971:
1959:
1948:
1892:
1836:
1821:
1800:
1784:
1760:
1747:
1718:
1706:
1680:
1624:
1564:
1549:
1523:
1488:
1454:
1432:
1408:
1397:
The United: Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and States of America
1385:
1370:
1355:
1333:
1310:
1291:
1270:
1252:
1228:
1195:
1167:
1143:
1118:
1097:
1071:
1040:
1027:
1020:
991:
983:
937:
929:
921:
895:
867:
851:
817:
747:
714:
700:
685:
652:
637:
622:
607:
554:
539:
524:
493:
478:
456:
434:
409:
377:
304:
288:
268:
247:
232:
214:
194:
186:
166:
148:
135:
106:
91:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2131:
to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
2012:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160319042641/http://www.paulsellar.com/other.html
224:
why is it important that the flag be Briton instead of England? is that in the
4140:
3418:
3213:
to be licensed for Commons. Would that be a better fit for the infobox image?
3064:
friend) when there are other issues requiring urgent work on the encyclopedia.
2615:
2585:
2034:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1891:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1725:
1623:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1104:
an explanatory footnote might be the easiest way of explaining the situation.
238:
Flags shouldn't be used to indicate nationality, location etc. on actor bios.
3738:
In the reference she describes herself as "British", which takes priority.--
2718:
is completely in the right to remove these problematic additions. Please see
771:
to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
4889:
reading, and not everybody else's. Also, "why are we including them" ==: -->
4695:
She's British-American. Why is she not listed as a British American actress
3899:
3523:
reasoning is true, or were there more reasons for coming to this consensus?
1540:
858:
find published verification and correct the page with appropriate citations.
392:, removing such info or adding the original comment again would constitute
4580:
3059:
and refrain from editing the article directly; if you do not, please read
2304:
In August 2015, Blunt became naturalised as an American citizen. She took
1124:
I have no real objection to English-American but English born American is
2413:
5137:
first photo in Career 2005-10 isn't Emily Blunt, it's Jennifer Lawrence
4734:. In the video interview cited, Blunt states the correct name is Laura.
4079:
Iâm damn sure not taking advice from an IP who only has 9 contributions.
159:
4850:
is an essay on stylistic choice rather than a policy to edit-war over.
4788:
also support "Leah". I can't seem to find any RSes opting for "Laura".
4134:
2015:
1259:
RfC: Is her American citizenship worth mentioning in the lead sentence?
2993:
doing so could potentially cause your editing privileges to be revoked
2726:. Even beyond that, infoboxes should be kept as simple as possible. â
1362:
I'm perfectly fine with British-American it's just when you link it (
1287:
Should her American citizenship be mentioned in the lead sentence? â
1186:
She has never directly said that. If so, show me a reliable source.
5223:, is being particularly notable in a negative way, which smacks of
1417:
If you cared to look, her so-called website is actually a fansite.
1219:
be put together so that a consensus will hopefully become evident.
1083:
the article for a week in order that it can closer adhere to the
928:
She was born in Wandsworth (London) and is a British actress. --
5030:
Knowledge's current standards would be "British and American".
4406:
3362:
2297:
1472:
769:
contributor has declared a personal or professional connection
756:
25:
2928:
I think either of these would be far better for the infobox.
5088:
2911:
2902:
2658:
is beneficial without passing unnecessary commentary on me.
1590:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1324:, and the article handling feels reasonable enough to me.
576:
Knowledge:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_newspaper
4968:
Shouldn't she be described as a British-American actress?
4866:
we mention the name of a film twice in the same paragraph.
1996:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1863:
https://movies.yahoo.com/person/emily-blunt/biography.html
1847:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1575:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
5204:." This extra trivia just contributes to infobox bloat.
5077:
Here is an article describing her as British and American
2600:"British-American", hardly the way to claim a consensus.
2135:
in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
1585:
http://movies.yahoo.com/person/emily-blunt/biography.html
3051:), with a photograph that meets Knowledge's very strict
466:
so will you be taking this matter to either noticeboard?
171:
She was in Henry VIII, as noted. And she got them out.
5181:
4731:
4618:
4612:
4274:
2655:
1840:
1568:
883:
879:
345:
5085:
even the simple wikipedia says she is american as well
3602:
page for her consensed (is that a word?) nationality
3538:
I'm not sure what you are confused on. Tennis player
3111:
to refer someone informally by their first name. Add
144:
on there? She was in the BBC version of that movie.
5160:, a google image search confirms it's Emily Blunt.
3246:are much better. Thank you for your effort though.
3040:Actually, we are primarily concerned, here, in the
2404:It's not straightforward, though. The construction
2038:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1895:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1627:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1049:. ' Context that was immediately removed. Further,
419:
Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard
2160:"Sherman, Set the Wayback Machine for Scientology"
321:? Also reported as a joke by many websites, e.g.,
4136:. Rotten Tomatoes refers to her solely as British
3328:). Simply change to that and all should be well.
1857:http://www.stutteringtreatment.org/aboutstaff.php
722:Please continue discussion or state your view at
570:? Since when are off hand jokes from celebrities
5081:https://www.britannica.com/biography/Emily-Blunt
4541:as sources in an article about a living person.
2217:"Emily Blunt: World, Meet Your New Mary Poppins"
469:consensus yet, between two editors disagreeing.
3883:, etc... So I'm not sure what the big deal is?
3416:please don't add your fan casting to articles.
3170:but given the weird look I'd say it's better. â
826:, two of Knowledge's core content policies are
3359:Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2019
2024:This message was posted before February 2018.
1881:This message was posted before February 2018.
1613:This message was posted before February 2018.
4842:how is the mere mention of a co-actor's name
4582:. Multiple reliable sources opting for Leah.
2547:Clarification on "British-American" consensus
1062:states she considers herself a dual citizen.
8:
4885:with... isn't this impressive", then that's
3752:Well, someone change it to "British" then.--
2957:i definitely think that these 2 proposed by
2129:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting
1045:'neutrally describe the person, and provide
5272:, are listed in a separate, linked article
4403:Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2023
1726:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFAAfYOYYtc
1000:Appropriation of Non-American Nationalities
423:Knowledge:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard
274:"British-American" and her jesting about it
5184:probably do not warrant inclusion, as the
5048:can I ask where I can find this standard?
2749:
2675:
1954:Nationality debates -- Salma Hayek example
1807:
1770:
1733:
1692:
1563:I have just modified one external link on
1341:
1238:
1233:As stated above, English-born American is
1129:
1006:
3503:Why isnât this listed in her film roles?
2828:Changing of Emily's main profile picture.
1984:I have just modified 2 external links on
1835:I have just modified 3 external links on
1469:Protected edit request on 16 October 2016
346:removing the naturalized citizenship info
205:down to 2010? I don't know how to do it.
5089:https://simple.wikipedia.org/Emily_Blunt
3270:File:Emily Blunt avp 2014 (headshot).jpg
2898:
2570:consensus can this please be linked to.
5193:infobox of their respective articles.
2322:
1964:2605:6000:F343:F300:F5A7:2C7C:9049:BBB2
1401:2605:6000:F369:D000:5D8A:F002:1AE6:88C7
5182:the relatives parameter of the infobox
4970:2A02:C7C:5AA0:E900:E02E:347F:D139:61B4
4806:in the video interview, Blunt states:
4697:2A02:C7C:5AA0:E900:E02E:347F:D139:61B4
4006:someone else a couple paragraphs ago.
3505:2601:5C0:4200:4380:B1CA:B209:2C0E:E586
2240:
2229:
2198:
2194:
2183:
799:) This user has declared a connection.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2827:
2775:âthey did not appear constructiveâ.
1602:to let others know (documentation at
943:
7:
5301:Articles with connected contributors
4949:Demise of the Crown Act 1901, s 1.)
2331:"Emily Blunt Becomes A U.s. Citizen"
2016:http://www.paulsellar.com/other.html
1806:non-American person into American.
1278:The following discussion is closed.
122:Image:EmilyBlunt devilwearsprada.jpg
4253:Just to revisit this a bit and per
3107:âs strict guidelines, but it isnât
2453:The article needs a filmography. -
2387:(or British-American), as stated.
4579:Blunt" (not Laura). Same for IMDb.
4064:then that is what Twitter is for--
2358:Page, Janice (26 September 2015).
1085:biography of living persons policy
24:
2166:. Yale Law School. Archived from
1988:. Please take a moment to review
1958:Thought it worth pointing to the
1839:. Please take a moment to review
1567:. Please take a moment to review
5274:List of Emily Blunt performances
5268:Blunt's performances, including
4610:I always find it ironic when my
4514:is in German but might suffice?
4464:
4410:
3366:
3053:copyright licensing requirements
1529:
1476:
1460:The discussion above is closed.
973:
760:
672:A discussion was started on the
643:move on. But I'm not convinced.
96:
29:
4575:refers to her as "Emily Olivia
3266:File:EmilyBluntTIFFSept2012.jpg
2215:Miller, Julie (February 2018).
1861:Corrected formatting/usage for
4846:? Also, on an unrelated note,
4397:22:47, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
4382:18:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
3910:21:04, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
3893:18:50, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
3866:11:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
3518:Reasoning for British-American
2891:Of other choices on wikimedia:
2383:This very clearly makes Blunt
1072:14:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
1041:22:47, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
1021:22:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
748:01:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
724:the BLP noticeboard discussion
715:21:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
701:21:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
686:07:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
653:07:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
638:07:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
623:05:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
608:04:26, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
555:05:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
540:03:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
525:03:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
494:06:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
479:04:47, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
457:04:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
435:03:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
410:03:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
378:03:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
305:22:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
289:20:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
269:05:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
233:21:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
92:10:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
5176:Infobox - relatives parameter
5117:06:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
5102:01:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
5073:14:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
5058:19:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
5040:03:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
5026:02:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
4959:20:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
4243:07:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
4145:. Ditto for Look to the Stars
4122:10:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
4106:09:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
4089:13:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
4074:13:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
4044:21:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
4030:01:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
3843:21:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
3811:21:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
3780:12:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
3627:22:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
3612:21:50, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
3585:21:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
3571:20:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
3553:19:26, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
3533:13:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
3513:02:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
3494:17:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
2800:07:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
2785:09:10, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
2399:03:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
2282:22:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
1681:17:07, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
982:-- If you were wondering. --
944:Foyle's War Television Series
852:10:11, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
818:01:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
248:02:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
215:20:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
167:09:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
149:01:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
5007:10:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
4993:08:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
4924:07:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
4901:07:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
4880:07:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
4860:06:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
4639:. It ain't the best source.
4356:18:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
4341:17:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
4321:17:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
4302:17:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
4287:17:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
4267:17:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
4156:every single reliable source
4016:06:22, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
4001:05:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
3970:00:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
3944:20:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
3929:15:50, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
3438:23:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
3409:20:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
2764:07:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
2736:07:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
2709:07:04, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
2690:07:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
2668:06:55, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
2610:16:19, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
2594:00:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
2580:19:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
2565:19:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
2287:Perhaps you should actually
2267:English vs. British-American
2092:11:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
1785:16:12, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
1761:02:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
1748:19:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
1719:18:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
1707:14:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
1550:18:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
1524:15:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
1455:12:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
1433:04:25, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
1409:04:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
1386:21:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
1371:21:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
1356:18:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
1334:23:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
1311:19:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
1292:18:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
1271:15:13, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
1253:18:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
1229:18:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
1206:Edit warring on this subject
1144:18:37, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
992:01:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
938:01:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
896:03:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
868:20:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
136:20:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
5247:Blunt starred as Juliet in
5011:She should be described as
4437:to reactivate your request.
4425:has been answered. Set the
4148:. Empire Online as English
3762:12:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
3748:12:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
3734:11:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
3393:to reactivate your request.
3381:has been answered. Set the
3353:11:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
3338:08:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
3312:11:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
3292:05:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
3259:09:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
3238:07:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
3223:07:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
3204:01:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
3184:20:45, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
3149:21:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
3125:20:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
3094:18:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
3028:17:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
3005:14:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
2976:09:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
2938:07:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
2887:07:26, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
2873:05:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
2859:02:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
2843:01:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
2823:16:37, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
2632:08:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
2291:the article you're editing.
1503:to reactivate your request.
1491:has been answered. Set the
1119:20:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
1098:09:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
5317:
5214:08:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
4649:07:27, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
4632:00:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
4606:23:44, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
4592:20:39, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
4566:22:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
4552:21:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
4524:21:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
4506:21:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
4177:20:11, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
4139:. Ditto for Biography.com
3473:20:13, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
3443:Confused about nationality
2654:) you need to explain how
2422:01:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
2262:02:44, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
2055:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1981:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1912:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1832:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1644:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1560:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1196:01:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
1168:00:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
201:Could someone please move
187:00:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
5237:23:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
5170:19:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
5147:17:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
4978:23:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
4835:Removing co-actor's names
4825:03:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
4798:11:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
4744:08:04, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
4725:07:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
4705:23:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
4670:22:58, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
4486:22:41, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
4459:19:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
4223:13:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
4208:05:45, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
4192:16:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
3719:23:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
3687:03:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
3662:07:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
2541:09:27, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
2526:20:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
2503:11:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
2484:11:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
2147:Reference named "miller":
2115:00:59, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
1822:18:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
1801:13:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
1115:Penny for your thoughts?
964:14:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
834:. Corrections need to be
4690:22:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
3458:22:12, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
3268:is a better choice than
2470:03:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
2441:04:12, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
2362:Emily Blunt, action hero
2127:I check pages listed in
1972:09:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
1949:11:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
1462:Please do not modify it.
1280:Please do not modify it.
1081:pending-change protected
922:04:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
767:The following Knowledge
5286:20:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
5263:19:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
4813:San Diego Union-Tribune
4781:San-Diego Union Tribune
3873:Encyclopedia Britannica
3013:anon as i mentioned to
2239:Cite magazine requires
2120:Orphaned references in
1977:External links modified
1828:External links modified
1556:External links modified
5156:does sort of resemble
3242:agree the 2 posted by
3046:not a fansite and not
2916:
2907:
2531:Yeah, pretty trivial.
317:The Hollywood Reporter
5198:purpose of an infobox
4834:
4313:ProcrastinatingReader
4279:ProcrastinatingReader
2961:are better than what
2915:
2906:
1150:English-born American
781:neutral point of view
160:The Other Boleyn Girl
142:The Other Boleyn Girl
113:) -- Were you wrong?
42:of past discussions.
5180:The names listed in
4983:Yes. As she is both
4755:Blunt has stated in
4598:ProcrasinatingReader
4584:ProcrasinatingReader
4230:ProcrasinatingReader
4169:ProcrasinatingReader
3465:ProcrasinatingReader
3211:this image on Flickr
2211:A Quiet Place (film)
2096:
2036:regular verification
1893:regular verification
1625:regular verification
832:No original research
773:conflict of interest
674:BLP Noticeboard here
572:encyclopedic content
5270:Gnomeo & Juliet
5250:Gnomeo & Juliet
3724:British-American.--
3703:Hyphenated American
3484:embarrassment, no?
2509:Personal life - FHM
2173:on 16 November 2012
2133:orphaned references
2107:All Hallow's Wraith
2026:After February 2018
1883:After February 2018
1615:After February 2018
1594:parameter below to
584:Knowledge:Recentism
124:: use or delete? -
4757:an interview with
3499:Gulliverâs Travels
3432:see what I've done
3209:I'm trying to get
2917:
2908:
2602:Sport and politics
2572:Sport and politics
2557:Sport and politics
2366:. The Boston Globe
2193:Unknown parameter
2080:InternetArchiveBot
2031:InternetArchiveBot
1937:InternetArchiveBot
1888:InternetArchiveBot
1669:InternetArchiveBot
1620:InternetArchiveBot
1281:
880:reverted your edit
394:disruptive editing
362:disruptive editing
5158:Jennifer Lawrence
5154:photo in question
4908:Devil Wears Prada
4536:
4441:
4440:
4339:
4142:. And Metacritic
3397:
3396:
2921:
2920:
2766:
2754:comment added by
2692:
2680:comment added by
2474:So true. Anyone?
2315:
2314:
2056:
1913:
1824:
1812:comment added by
1787:
1775:comment added by
1750:
1738:comment added by
1709:
1697:comment added by
1645:
1548:
1507:
1506:
1358:
1346:comment added by
1279:
1255:
1243:comment added by
1146:
1134:comment added by
1023:
1011:comment added by
954:comment added by
912:comment added by
805:
804:
177:comment added by
134:
82:comment added by
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
5308:
5186:infobox template
5013:British-American
4754:
4621:
4615:
4547:
4530:
4474:reliable sources
4468:
4467:
4432:
4428:
4414:
4413:
4407:
4329:
3436:
3433:
3427:
3421:
3388:
3384:
3370:
3369:
3363:
3304:Hollywoodfanatic
3251:Hollywoodfanatic
3196:Hollywoodfanatic
3181:
3176:
3145:
3138:
3090:
3083:
3020:Hollywoodfanatic
2968:Hollywoodfanatic
2899:
2865:Hollywoodfanatic
2835:Hollywoodfanatic
2811:Hollywoodfanatic
2533:NinjaRobotPirate
2397:
2395:
2385:English-American
2376:
2375:
2373:
2371:
2355:
2349:
2348:
2346:
2344:
2336:Contactmusic.com
2327:
2306:dual-citizenship
2298:
2259:
2248:
2242:
2237:
2235:
2227:
2225:
2223:
2206:
2200:
2196:
2191:
2189:
2181:
2179:
2178:
2172:
2158:Miller, Ernest.
2090:
2081:
2054:
2053:
2032:
1947:
1938:
1911:
1910:
1889:
1798:
1679:
1670:
1643:
1642:
1621:
1609:
1538:
1533:
1532:
1515:
1498:
1494:
1480:
1479:
1473:
1452:
1447:
1430:
1428:
1423:
1364:British-American
1235:definitely wrong
1185:
1126:definitely wrong
1116:
1110:
981:
977:
976:
966:
924:
878:inappropriately
840:reliable sources
764:
763:
757:
737:
446:
391:
254:Citation needed?
189:
130:
104:
100:
99:
94:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
18:Talk:Emily Blunt
5316:
5315:
5311:
5310:
5309:
5307:
5306:
5305:
5291:
5290:
5245:
5190:this discussion
5178:
5135:
4966:
4934:
4848:WP:FORMERLATTER
4837:
4748:
4713:
4678:
4617:
4611:
4545:
4494:
4472:please provide
4465:
4430:
4426:
4411:
4405:
4370:
4251:
4130:
3754:135.196.181.166
3520:
3501:
3481:
3445:
3431:
3425:
3419:
3417:
3386:
3382:
3367:
3361:
3191:Julietdeltalima
3177:
3172:
3143:
3137:Julietdeltalima
3136:
3088:
3082:Julietdeltalima
3081:
2830:
2808:
2772:
2720:MOS:POSTNOMINAL
2699:is sufficient.
2639:
2549:
2511:
2451:
2390:
2388:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2369:
2367:
2357:
2356:
2352:
2342:
2340:
2339:. 6 August 2015
2329:
2328:
2324:
2269:
2257:
2238:
2228:
2221:
2219:
2214:
2192:
2182:
2176:
2174:
2170:
2157:
2154:Wayback Machine
2125:
2099:
2084:
2079:
2047:
2040:have permission
2030:
1994:this simple FaQ
1979:
1956:
1941:
1936:
1904:
1897:have permission
1887:
1845:this simple FaQ
1830:
1796:
1777:118.174.127.107
1688:
1673:
1668:
1636:
1629:have permission
1619:
1603:
1573:this simple FaQ
1558:
1530:
1509:
1496:
1492:
1477:
1471:
1466:
1465:
1448:
1443:
1426:
1421:
1419:
1348:108.171.128.164
1284:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1261:
1245:108.171.128.164
1208:
1179:
1152:
1136:108.171.128.164
1114:
1106:
1002:
974:
972:
949:
946:
907:
904:
761:
755:
730:Anythingyouwant
727:
693:Anythingyouwant
596:BLP noticeboard
568:news aggregator
440:
385:
276:
256:
222:
199:
172:
156:
119:
97:
95:
77:
74:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5314:
5312:
5304:
5303:
5293:
5292:
5289:
5288:
5244:
5241:
5240:
5239:
5177:
5174:
5173:
5172:
5139:109.159.69.163
5134:
5133:Photo of J Law
5131:
5130:
5129:
5128:
5127:
5126:
5125:
5124:
5123:
5122:
5121:
5120:
5119:
5091:
5086:
5083:
5078:
5009:
4995:
4965:
4962:
4944:King's Counsel
4933:
4930:
4929:
4928:
4927:
4926:
4903:
4867:
4836:
4833:
4832:
4831:
4830:
4829:
4828:
4827:
4712:
4711:Leah or Laura?
4709:
4708:
4707:
4677:
4676:She is English
4674:
4673:
4672:
4657:
4656:
4655:
4654:
4653:
4652:
4651:
4569:
4568:
4554:
4539:not acceptable
4527:
4526:
4493:
4490:
4489:
4488:
4439:
4438:
4415:
4404:
4401:
4400:
4399:
4369:
4366:
4365:
4364:
4363:
4362:
4361:
4360:
4359:
4358:
4343:
4308:WP:UKNATIONALS
4255:MOS:CONTEXTBIO
4250:
4247:
4246:
4245:
4215:121.99.126.230
4211:
4210:
4129:
4126:
4125:
4124:
4109:
4108:
4092:
4091:
4061:
4060:
4059:
4058:
4057:
4056:
4055:
4054:
4053:
4052:
4051:
4050:
4049:
4048:
4047:
4046:
3979:
3978:
3977:
3976:
3975:
3974:
3973:
3972:
3951:
3950:
3949:
3948:
3947:
3946:
3913:
3912:
3895:
3854:
3853:
3852:
3851:
3850:
3849:
3848:
3847:
3846:
3845:
3822:
3821:
3820:
3819:
3818:
3817:
3816:
3815:
3814:
3813:
3789:
3788:
3787:
3786:
3785:
3784:
3783:
3782:
3736:
3675:
3674:
3673:
3672:
3671:
3670:
3669:
3668:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3664:
3638:
3637:
3636:
3635:
3634:
3633:
3632:
3631:
3630:
3629:
3592:
3591:
3590:
3589:
3588:
3587:
3556:
3555:
3519:
3516:
3500:
3497:
3480:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3444:
3441:
3395:
3394:
3371:
3360:
3357:
3356:
3355:
3317:
3316:
3315:
3314:
3264:I concur that
3262:
3261:
3240:
3207:
3206:
3187:
3186:
3160:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3156:
3155:
3154:
3153:
3152:
3151:
3128:
3127:
3070:
3069:
3068:
3067:
3066:
3065:
3033:
3032:
3031:
3030:
3008:
3007:
2985:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2980:
2979:
2978:
2947:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2942:
2941:
2940:
2919:
2918:
2909:
2897:
2896:
2895:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2861:
2829:
2826:
2807:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2771:
2768:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2638:
2635:
2613:
2612:
2548:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2510:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2491:already exists
2476:Anna Frodesiak
2450:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2425:
2424:
2410:Irish-American
2378:
2377:
2350:
2321:
2320:
2316:
2313:
2312:
2309:
2302:
2295:
2293:
2292:
2268:
2265:
2250:
2249:
2207:
2124:
2118:
2098:
2095:
2074:
2073:
2066:
2019:
2018:
2010:Added archive
2008:
2000:Added archive
1978:
1975:
1955:
1952:
1931:
1930:
1923:
1876:
1875:
1867:Added archive
1865:
1859:
1851:Added archive
1829:
1826:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1722:
1721:
1687:
1684:
1663:
1662:
1655:
1588:
1587:
1579:Added archive
1557:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1505:
1504:
1481:
1470:
1467:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1412:
1411:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1337:
1336:
1314:
1313:
1296:
1285:
1276:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1207:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1188:70.124.179.116
1151:
1148:
1122:
1121:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1013:81.106.152.116
1001:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
945:
942:
941:
940:
903:
900:
899:
898:
855:
854:
803:
802:
801:
800:
765:
754:
751:
720:
719:
718:
717:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
559:
558:
557:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
400:on your part.
311:86.135.158.125
308:
307:
281:86.135.158.125
275:
272:
255:
252:
251:
250:
221:
218:
198:
191:
158:She wasn't in
155:
152:
118:
115:
73:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5313:
5302:
5299:
5298:
5296:
5287:
5283:
5279:
5275:
5271:
5267:
5266:
5265:
5264:
5260:
5256:
5252:
5251:
5242:
5238:
5234:
5230:
5226:
5222:
5221:Crispin Blunt
5218:
5217:
5216:
5215:
5211:
5207:
5203:
5199:
5194:
5191:
5187:
5183:
5175:
5171:
5167:
5163:
5159:
5155:
5151:
5150:
5149:
5148:
5144:
5140:
5132:
5118:
5114:
5110:
5105:
5104:
5103:
5099:
5095:
5092:
5090:
5087:
5084:
5082:
5079:
5076:
5075:
5074:
5070:
5066:
5061:
5060:
5059:
5055:
5051:
5047:
5043:
5042:
5041:
5037:
5033:
5029:
5028:
5027:
5023:
5019:
5014:
5010:
5008:
5004:
5000:
4996:
4994:
4990:
4986:
4982:
4981:
4980:
4979:
4975:
4971:
4963:
4961:
4960:
4956:
4952:
4946:
4945:
4940:
4939:
4931:
4925:
4921:
4917:
4913:
4909:
4904:
4902:
4898:
4894:
4888:
4883:
4882:
4881:
4877:
4873:
4868:
4864:
4863:
4862:
4861:
4857:
4853:
4849:
4845:
4841:
4826:
4822:
4818:
4814:
4809:
4805:
4801:
4800:
4799:
4795:
4791:
4787:
4783:
4782:
4777:
4776:
4771:
4770:
4765:
4761:
4760:
4752:
4747:
4746:
4745:
4741:
4737:
4733:
4729:
4728:
4727:
4726:
4722:
4718:
4710:
4706:
4702:
4698:
4694:
4693:
4692:
4691:
4687:
4683:
4682:92.234.17.165
4675:
4671:
4667:
4663:
4658:
4650:
4646:
4642:
4638:
4635:
4634:
4633:
4629:
4625:
4620:
4614:
4613:original edit
4609:
4608:
4607:
4603:
4599:
4595:
4594:
4593:
4589:
4585:
4581:
4578:
4574:
4571:
4570:
4567:
4563:
4559:
4555:
4553:
4550:
4549:
4548:
4540:
4534:
4533:edit conflict
4529:
4528:
4525:
4521:
4517:
4516:Theroadislong
4513:
4510:
4509:
4508:
4507:
4503:
4499:
4498:Theroadislong
4491:
4487:
4483:
4479:
4475:
4471:
4463:
4462:
4461:
4460:
4456:
4452:
4451:Lance Hendrix
4449:
4444:
4436:
4433:parameter to
4424:
4420:
4416:
4409:
4408:
4402:
4398:
4394:
4390:
4386:
4385:
4384:
4383:
4379:
4375:
4367:
4357:
4353:
4349:
4344:
4342:
4337:
4333:
4328:
4324:
4323:
4322:
4318:
4314:
4309:
4305:
4304:
4303:
4299:
4295:
4294:Geraldo Perez
4290:
4289:
4288:
4284:
4280:
4276:
4271:
4270:
4269:
4268:
4264:
4260:
4259:Geraldo Perez
4256:
4248:
4244:
4240:
4236:
4231:
4228:Both you and
4227:
4226:
4225:
4224:
4220:
4216:
4209:
4205:
4201:
4200:Fyunck(click)
4196:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4189:
4185:
4179:
4178:
4174:
4170:
4166:
4165:WP:BLPPRIMARY
4160:
4157:
4152:
4150:
4147:
4144:
4141:
4138:
4135:
4127:
4123:
4119:
4115:
4111:
4110:
4107:
4103:
4099:
4094:
4093:
4090:
4086:
4082:
4078:
4077:
4076:
4075:
4071:
4067:
4045:
4041:
4037:
4036:Fyunck(click)
4033:
4032:
4031:
4027:
4023:
4019:
4018:
4017:
4013:
4009:
4008:Fyunck(click)
4004:
4003:
4002:
3998:
3994:
3989:
3988:
3987:
3986:
3985:
3984:
3983:
3982:
3981:
3980:
3971:
3967:
3963:
3959:
3958:
3957:
3956:
3955:
3954:
3953:
3952:
3945:
3941:
3937:
3936:Fyunck(click)
3932:
3931:
3930:
3926:
3922:
3917:
3916:
3915:
3914:
3911:
3907:
3904:
3901:
3896:
3894:
3890:
3886:
3885:Fyunck(click)
3882:
3878:
3877:Famous People
3874:
3870:
3869:
3868:
3867:
3863:
3859:
3844:
3840:
3836:
3832:
3831:
3830:
3829:
3828:
3827:
3826:
3825:
3824:
3823:
3812:
3808:
3804:
3799:
3798:
3797:
3796:
3795:
3794:
3793:
3792:
3791:
3790:
3781:
3777:
3773:
3769:
3765:
3764:
3763:
3759:
3755:
3751:
3750:
3749:
3745:
3741:
3737:
3735:
3731:
3727:
3722:
3721:
3720:
3716:
3712:
3708:
3707:Saoirse Ronan
3704:
3699:
3695:
3691:
3690:
3689:
3688:
3684:
3680:
3663:
3659:
3655:
3650:
3649:
3648:
3647:
3646:
3645:
3644:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3639:
3628:
3624:
3620:
3619:Fyunck(click)
3615:
3614:
3613:
3609:
3605:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3597:
3596:
3595:
3594:
3593:
3586:
3582:
3578:
3577:Fyunck(click)
3574:
3573:
3572:
3568:
3564:
3560:
3559:
3558:
3557:
3554:
3550:
3546:
3545:Fyunck(click)
3541:
3537:
3536:
3535:
3534:
3530:
3526:
3517:
3515:
3514:
3510:
3506:
3498:
3496:
3495:
3491:
3487:
3486:Chiswick Chap
3478:
3474:
3470:
3466:
3462:
3461:
3460:
3459:
3455:
3451:
3450:Wilyachillout
3442:
3440:
3439:
3434:
3428:
3422:
3415:
3411:
3410:
3406:
3402:
3392:
3389:parameter to
3380:
3376:
3372:
3365:
3364:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3342:
3341:
3340:
3339:
3335:
3331:
3330:Fyunck(click)
3327:
3324:over choice
3323:
3313:
3309:
3305:
3301:
3298:
3297:
3296:
3295:
3294:
3293:
3289:
3288:
3283:
3282:
3277:
3276:
3271:
3267:
3260:
3256:
3252:
3249:
3245:
3241:
3239:
3235:
3231:
3230:Fyunck(click)
3227:
3226:
3225:
3224:
3220:
3216:
3212:
3205:
3201:
3197:
3192:
3189:
3188:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3175:
3169:
3165:
3162:
3161:
3150:
3147:
3146:
3140:
3139:
3132:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3126:
3122:
3118:
3114:
3110:
3106:
3101:
3097:
3096:
3095:
3092:
3091:
3085:
3084:
3076:
3075:
3074:
3073:
3072:
3071:
3062:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3049:
3043:
3039:
3038:
3037:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3029:
3025:
3021:
3016:
3012:
3011:
3010:
3009:
3006:
3003:
3000:
2999:
2994:
2990:
2987:
2986:
2977:
2973:
2969:
2964:
2960:
2956:
2955:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2939:
2935:
2931:
2930:Fyunck(click)
2927:
2926:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2922:
2914:
2910:
2905:
2901:
2900:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2876:
2875:
2874:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2860:
2856:
2852:
2851:Fyunck(click)
2847:
2846:
2845:
2844:
2840:
2836:
2825:
2824:
2820:
2816:
2812:
2806:Infobox image
2805:
2801:
2797:
2793:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2782:
2778:
2769:
2767:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2737:
2733:
2729:
2725:
2724:MOS:JOBTITLES
2721:
2717:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2706:
2702:
2698:
2697:WP:COMMONNAME
2694:
2693:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2665:
2661:
2657:
2653:
2650:
2647:
2643:
2636:
2634:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2582:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2567:
2566:
2562:
2558:
2553:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2523:
2519:
2518:50.207.55.130
2515:
2508:
2504:
2500:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2487:
2486:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2472:
2471:
2467:
2463:
2459:
2456:
2448:
2442:
2438:
2434:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2396:
2394:
2386:
2365:
2363:
2354:
2351:
2338:
2337:
2332:
2326:
2323:
2319:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2296:
2290:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2266:
2264:
2263:
2260:
2255:
2246:
2233:
2232:cite magazine
2218:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2187:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2155:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2144:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2123:
2119:
2117:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2097:Mother's name
2094:
2093:
2088:
2083:
2082:
2071:
2067:
2064:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2051:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2027:
2022:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1982:
1976:
1974:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1953:
1951:
1950:
1945:
1940:
1939:
1928:
1924:
1921:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1908:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1884:
1879:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1864:
1860:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1833:
1827:
1825:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1803:
1802:
1799:
1793:
1788:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1762:
1759:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1732:
1727:
1720:
1717:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1685:
1683:
1682:
1677:
1672:
1671:
1660:
1656:
1653:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1640:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1616:
1611:
1607:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1561:
1555:
1551:
1546:
1542:
1536:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1522:
1517:
1513:
1502:
1499:parameter to
1490:
1486:
1482:
1475:
1474:
1468:
1463:
1456:
1453:
1451:
1446:
1440:
1439:
1434:
1431:
1429:
1424:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1393:
1392:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1378:Fyunck(click)
1374:
1373:
1372:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1303:Fyunck(click)
1299:
1298:
1297:
1294:
1293:
1290:
1283:
1272:
1269:
1258:
1256:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1236:
1231:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1205:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1183:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1160:107.92.60.116
1157:
1149:
1147:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1127:
1120:
1117:
1111:
1109:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1092:
1091:
1086:
1082:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1056:
1054:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
999:
993:
989:
985:
980:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
965:
961:
957:
956:86.171.175.48
953:
939:
935:
931:
927:
926:
925:
923:
919:
915:
914:70.241.73.136
911:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
872:
871:
870:
869:
865:
861:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
828:Verifiability
825:
822:
821:
820:
819:
815:
811:
798:
795:
792:
788:
785:
784:
782:
778:
777:autobiography
774:
770:
766:
759:
758:
753:Joanna Mackie
752:
750:
749:
745:
741:
735:
731:
725:
716:
712:
708:
707:Fyunck(click)
704:
703:
702:
698:
694:
690:
689:
688:
687:
683:
679:
675:
654:
650:
646:
645:Fyunck(click)
641:
640:
639:
635:
631:
626:
625:
624:
620:
616:
615:Fyunck(click)
611:
610:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:Fyunck(click)
543:
542:
541:
537:
533:
528:
527:
526:
522:
518:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
495:
491:
487:
486:Fyunck(click)
482:
481:
480:
476:
472:
467:
463:
462:Fyunck(click)
460:
459:
458:
454:
450:
449:Fyunck(click)
444:
438:
437:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
415:Fyunck(click)
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
402:Fyunck(click)
399:
395:
389:
382:
381:
380:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:Fyunck(click)
339:
334:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
318:
315:the video of
312:
306:
302:
298:
297:Fyunck(click)
293:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
273:
271:
270:
266:
262:
261:65.95.178.150
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
231:
227:
219:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
196:
192:
190:
188:
184:
180:
179:86.161.175.30
176:
169:
168:
165:
161:
153:
151:
150:
147:
143:
138:
137:
133:
129:
128:
123:
116:
114:
112:
108:
103:
93:
89:
85:
81:
72:
71:Michael Buble
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
5269:
5255:82.5.217.208
5248:
5246:
5201:
5195:
5179:
5136:
4967:
4951:Madmannimann
4947:
4941:
4935:
4912:film project
4907:
4886:
4838:
4812:
4807:
4780:
4774:
4768:
4763:
4762:(which is a
4758:
4714:
4679:
4576:
4543:
4542:
4495:
4469:
4445:
4442:
4434:
4419:edit request
4371:
4368:Revisiting 3
4252:
4249:Revisiting 2
4212:
4180:
4161:
4155:
4153:
4131:
4066:185.2.196.87
4062:
3855:
3767:
3697:
3693:
3676:
3521:
3502:
3482:
3446:
3413:
3412:
3401:SiriusLee314
3398:
3390:
3375:edit request
3325:
3321:
3318:
3299:
3286:
3280:
3274:
3263:
3208:
3178:
3173:
3167:
3163:
3141:
3134:
3086:
3079:
3047:
3042:encyclopedia
3041:
2997:
2988:
2946:
2831:
2809:
2773:
2756:223.24.20.21
2750:â Preceding
2746:
2682:223.24.20.21
2676:â Preceding
2648:
2642:223.24.20.21
2640:
2614:
2583:
2568:
2554:
2550:
2516:
2512:
2473:
2455:Presidentman
2452:
2409:
2405:
2392:
2384:
2382:
2370:28 September
2368:. Retrieved
2361:
2353:
2343:16 September
2341:. Retrieved
2334:
2325:
2317:
2294:
2288:
2270:
2251:
2220:. Retrieved
2201:suggested) (
2199:|url-status=
2175:. Retrieved
2168:the original
2163:
2146:
2145:
2140:
2126:
2100:
2078:
2075:
2050:source check
2029:
2023:
2020:
1983:
1980:
1957:
1935:
1932:
1907:source check
1886:
1880:
1877:
1834:
1831:
1814:183.88.38.73
1808:â Preceding
1804:
1791:
1789:
1771:â Preceding
1767:
1734:â Preceding
1723:
1693:â Preceding
1689:
1667:
1664:
1639:source check
1618:
1612:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1589:
1562:
1559:
1534:
1518:
1508:
1500:
1485:edit request
1461:
1449:
1444:
1418:
1396:
1342:â Preceding
1338:
1317:
1295:
1286:
1277:
1239:â Preceding
1234:
1232:
1212:
1209:
1182:HenryBarnill
1153:
1130:â Preceding
1125:
1123:
1107:
1089:
1078:
1059:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1007:â Preceding
1003:
978:
950:â Preceding
947:
908:â Preceding
905:
884:was reverted
876:HenryBarnill
856:
806:
793:
768:
721:
671:
571:
465:
398:edit warring
366:edit warring
352:and appears
335:
316:
309:
277:
257:
223:
202:
200:
170:
157:
141:
139:
125:
120:
101:
84:81.57.219.69
78:â Preceding
75:
60:
43:
37:
5225:PR handling
4964:Citizenship
4942:see also :
4872:Joeyconnick
4840:Joeyconnick
4759:Vanity Fair
4423:Emily Blunt
4374:Malerooster
3679:Kay girl 97
3540:Andy Murray
3379:Emily Blunt
3117:2.51.18.236
3113:stage names
3100:MOS:SURNAME
3061:MOS:SURNAME
2728:Joeyconnick
2449:Filmography
2222:January 19,
2137:Emily Blunt
2122:Emily Blunt
1986:Emily Blunt
1960:Salma Hayek
1837:Emily Blunt
1792:technically
1740:1.1.162.158
1699:1.1.162.158
1606:Sourcecheck
1565:Emily Blunt
1489:Emily Blunt
1326:Markbassett
1108:HJÂ Mitchell
1028:MOS:BLPLEAD
860:Liz Hopkins
824:Liz Hopkins
810:Liz Hopkins
787:Liz_Hopkins
734:Someguy1221
630:Someguy1221
354:tendentious
240:Jim Michael
203:Wild Target
195:Wild Target
173:âPreceding
36:This is an
5162:Jessintime
5152:While the
5094:Matteow101
5050:Matteow101
5046:Trillfendi
5032:Trillfendi
5018:Matteow101
4427:|answered=
4133:as British
4128:Revisiting
4081:Trillfendi
3962:Trillfendi
3772:Muirofsara
3740:Muirofsara
3726:Muirofsara
3479:Lead image
3426:talk to me
3383:|answered=
3044:(which is
2406:X-American
2318:References
2241:|magazine=
2195:|dead-url=
2177:2007-01-04
2087:Report bug
1944:Report bug
1714:American.â
1676:Report bug
1512:Beeblebrox
1493:|answered=
1221:Beeblebrox
1090:Ritchie333
564:apologized
532:Connor7617
530:comment.
517:Connor7617
443:Lapadite77
388:Lapadite77
207:Markunator
146:Iman S1995
140:Why isn't
5109:MapReader
5065:MapReader
4999:MapReader
4893:Krimuk2.0
4852:Krimuk2.0
4764:much more
4641:Krimuk2.0
4619:restored
4511:This one
4492:Full name
4470:Not done:
4389:MapReader
4348:MapReader
4235:MapReader
4154:In fact,
3345:Krimuk2.0
3248:Krimuk2.0
3215:Krimuk2.0
3164:Support 1
3109:attacking
3048:US Weekly
3015:Krimuk2.0
2989:Disagree.
2963:Krimuk2.0
2879:Krimuk2.0
2815:Krimuk2.0
2792:Krimuk2.0
2770:Residence
2716:Krimuk2.0
2701:Krimuk2.0
2660:Krimuk2.0
2656:this edit
2620:trim this
2495:Krimuk2.0
2254:AnomieBOT
2197:ignored (
2070:this tool
2063:this tool
1927:this tool
1920:this tool
1758:Fundude99
1716:Fundude99
1686:American?
1659:this tool
1652:this tool
1537:â Martin
1521:Fundude99
1368:Fundude99
1289:Fundude99
1268:Fundude99
882:, and he
358:WP:POINTy
61:Archive 1
5295:Category
5206:Lapadite
4932:QC to KC
4916:Lapadite
4844:WP:PROMO
4817:Lapadite
4804:At 12:37
4751:Lapadite
4736:Lapadite
4732:fixed it
4662:Nidamaya
4478:Cannolis
4446:Source:
4332:contribs
3898:British.
3414:Not done
3275:SNUGGUMS
3168:as great
2752:unsigned
2678:unsigned
2652:contribs
2624:Lapadite
2466:Talkback
2462:contribs
2391:General
2186:cite web
2076:Cheers.â
1933:Cheers.â
1810:unsigned
1773:unsigned
1736:unsigned
1695:unsigned
1665:Cheers.â
1344:unsigned
1241:unsigned
1132:unsigned
1064:Twobells
1033:Lapadite
1009:unsigned
952:unsigned
910:unsigned
888:Lapadite
844:Lapadite
797:contribs
740:Lapadite
678:Lapadite
600:Lapadite
588:WP:UNDUE
471:Lapadite
427:Lapadite
370:Lapadite
175:unsigned
102:Not done
80:unsigned
5278:Opolito
5229:Keithzg
4985:Sanbear
4790:Pamzeis
4769:Rappler
4717:Sbishop
4546:Hut 8.5
4275:example
4184:Scf1985
4114:Scf1985
4098:Scf1985
4022:Wolfdog
3993:Scf1985
3921:Scf1985
3881:the BBC
3858:Scf1985
3835:Scf1985
3803:Scf1985
3711:Wolfdog
3654:Scf1985
3604:Scf1985
3563:Scf1985
3525:Scf1985
3300:Support
2777:Scf1985
2433:Vometia
2393:Ization
2274:Vometia
2164:LawMeme
1990:my edit
1841:my edit
1592:checked
1569:my edit
1422:Calidum
1322:WP:LEAD
1079:I have
1047:context
902:British
592:WP:ONUS
439:Agreed
421:or the
350:WP:NPOV
319:article
132:crztalk
39:archive
5243:Movies
4775:Empire
4327:IJBall
3343:Done.
3244:Fyunck
3144:(talk)
3105:WP:BLP
3089:(talk)
3057:WP:COI
2959:Fyunck
2674:here
2637:Titles
2171:(Blog)
1600:failed
1217:WP:RFC
984:AstroU
930:AstroU
779:, and
580:WP:BLP
338:WP:BLP
226:wp:MoS
220:Flags?
154:Boleyn
107:AstroU
4431:|ans=
4417:This
3420:JDDJS
3387:|ans=
3373:This
3287:edits
3174:Davey
2998:Anon.
2616:JDDJS
2586:JDDJS
2209:From
2152:From
1497:|ans=
1483:This
1445:Davey
836:cited
117:Image
16:<
5282:talk
5259:talk
5233:talk
5210:talk
5196:The
5166:talk
5143:talk
5113:talk
5098:talk
5069:talk
5054:talk
5036:talk
5022:talk
5003:talk
4989:talk
4974:talk
4955:talk
4920:talk
4897:talk
4887:your
4876:talk
4856:talk
4821:talk
4794:talk
4784:and
4740:talk
4721:talk
4701:talk
4686:talk
4666:talk
4645:talk
4628:talk
4602:talk
4588:talk
4577:Leah
4572:This
4562:talk
4520:talk
4502:talk
4482:talk
4455:talk
4393:talk
4378:talk
4352:talk
4336:talk
4317:talk
4298:talk
4283:talk
4263:talk
4239:talk
4219:talk
4204:talk
4188:talk
4173:talk
4118:talk
4102:talk
4085:talk
4070:talk
4040:talk
4026:talk
4012:talk
3997:talk
3966:talk
3940:talk
3925:talk
3889:talk
3862:talk
3839:talk
3807:talk
3776:talk
3758:talk
3744:talk
3730:talk
3715:talk
3683:talk
3658:talk
3623:talk
3608:talk
3581:talk
3567:talk
3549:talk
3529:talk
3509:talk
3490:talk
3469:talk
3454:talk
3405:talk
3349:talk
3334:talk
3308:talk
3281:talk
3255:talk
3234:talk
3219:talk
3200:talk
3179:2010
3121:talk
3024:talk
2972:talk
2934:talk
2883:talk
2869:talk
2855:talk
2839:talk
2819:talk
2796:talk
2781:talk
2760:talk
2732:talk
2722:and
2705:talk
2686:talk
2664:talk
2646:talk
2628:talk
2606:talk
2590:talk
2576:talk
2561:talk
2537:talk
2522:talk
2499:talk
2493:. --
2480:talk
2458:talk
2437:talk
2418:talk
2372:2015
2345:2015
2289:read
2278:talk
2245:help
2224:2018
2203:help
2141:this
2111:talk
2103:here
1968:talk
1818:talk
1781:talk
1744:talk
1703:talk
1596:true
1545:talk
1541:MSGJ
1535:Done
1450:2010
1405:talk
1382:talk
1352:talk
1330:talk
1307:talk
1249:talk
1225:talk
1211:you
1192:talk
1164:talk
1140:talk
1068:talk
1037:talk
1017:talk
988:talk
979:Done
960:talk
934:talk
918:talk
892:talk
864:talk
848:talk
830:and
814:talk
791:talk
744:talk
732:and
711:talk
697:talk
682:talk
649:talk
634:talk
619:talk
604:talk
551:talk
536:talk
521:talk
490:talk
475:talk
453:talk
431:talk
406:talk
396:and
374:talk
364:and
356:and
301:talk
285:talk
265:talk
244:talk
211:talk
183:talk
111:talk
88:talk
4786:CNN
4616:is
4429:or
4421:to
3768:and
3385:or
3377:to
2489:It
2414:Hux
2044:RfC
2014:to
2004:to
1901:RfC
1871:to
1855:to
1797:Vom
1633:RfC
1610:).
1598:or
1583:to
1495:or
1487:to
1399:).
1213:did
1060:she
838:to
783:.
230:Amo
164:Amo
127:crz
105:--
5297::
5284:)
5276:.
5261:)
5235:)
5227:.
5212:)
5168:)
5145:)
5115:)
5100:)
5071:)
5056:)
5038:)
5024:)
5005:)
4991:)
4976:)
4957:)
4922:)
4914:.
4899:)
4878:)
4858:)
4823:)
4796:)
4778:,
4772:,
4742:)
4730:I
4723:)
4703:)
4688:)
4668:)
4647:)
4630:)
4624:âď¸
4622:.
4604:)
4590:)
4564:)
4558:âď¸
4522:)
4504:)
4484:)
4457:)
4435:no
4395:)
4380:)
4354:)
4334:â˘
4319:)
4300:)
4285:)
4265:)
4241:)
4221:)
4206:)
4190:)
4175:)
4151:.
4120:)
4104:)
4087:)
4072:)
4042:)
4028:)
4014:)
3999:)
3968:)
3942:)
3927:)
3908:1
3891:)
3879:,
3875:,
3864:)
3841:)
3809:)
3778:)
3760:)
3746:)
3732:)
3717:)
3685:)
3660:)
3625:)
3610:)
3583:)
3569:)
3551:)
3531:)
3511:)
3492:)
3471:)
3456:)
3429:â˘
3407:)
3391:no
3351:)
3336:)
3310:)
3290:)
3284:/
3257:)
3236:)
3221:)
3202:)
3123:)
3026:)
3002:U.
2995:.
2974:)
2936:)
2885:)
2871:)
2857:)
2841:)
2821:)
2798:)
2783:)
2762:)
2734:)
2707:)
2688:)
2666:)
2630:)
2608:)
2592:)
2578:)
2563:)
2539:)
2524:)
2501:)
2482:)
2468:)
2460:¡
2439:)
2420:)
2333:.
2311:â
2301:â
2280:)
2236::
2234:}}
2230:{{
2213::
2190::
2188:}}
2184:{{
2162:.
2156::
2113:)
2105:.
2057:.
2052:}}
2048:{{
1970:)
1914:.
1909:}}
1905:{{
1820:)
1783:)
1746:)
1705:)
1646:.
1641:}}
1637:{{
1608:}}
1604:{{
1543:¡
1501:no
1407:)
1384:)
1354:)
1332:)
1318:OK
1309:)
1251:)
1227:)
1194:)
1166:)
1142:)
1112:|
1070:)
1039:)
1019:)
990:)
962:)
936:)
920:)
894:)
886:.
866:)
850:)
842:.
816:)
775:,
746:)
738:.
726:,
713:)
699:)
684:)
676:.
651:)
636:)
621:)
606:)
598:.
590:,
586:,
582:,
578:,
553:)
538:)
523:)
492:)
477:)
464:,
455:)
433:)
408:)
376:)
368:.
344:,
340:.
333:.
330:,
327:,
324:,
303:)
287:)
279:--
267:)
246:)
228:?
213:)
185:)
162:.
90:)
5280:(
5257:(
5231:(
5208:(
5164:(
5141:(
5111:(
5096:(
5067:(
5052:(
5044:@
5034:(
5020:(
5001:(
4987:(
4972:(
4953:(
4918:(
4895:(
4874:(
4854:(
4819:(
4792:(
4753::
4749:@
4738:(
4719:(
4699:(
4684:(
4664:(
4643:(
4626:(
4600:(
4586:(
4560:(
4535:)
4531:(
4518:(
4500:(
4480:(
4453:(
4391:(
4376:(
4350:(
4338:)
4330:(
4315:(
4296:(
4281:(
4261:(
4237:(
4217:(
4202:(
4186:(
4171:(
4116:(
4100:(
4083:(
4068:(
4038:(
4024:(
4010:(
3995:(
3964:(
3938:(
3923:(
3906:x
3903:v
3900:T
3887:(
3860:(
3837:(
3805:(
3774:(
3756:(
3742:(
3728:(
3713:(
3698:x
3694:x
3681:(
3656:(
3621:(
3606:(
3579:(
3565:(
3547:(
3527:(
3507:(
3488:(
3467:(
3452:(
3435:)
3423:(
3403:(
3347:(
3332:(
3326:2
3322:1
3306:(
3278:(
3253:(
3232:(
3217:(
3198:(
3119:(
3022:(
2970:(
2932:(
2881:(
2867:(
2853:(
2837:(
2817:(
2794:(
2779:(
2758:(
2730:(
2703:(
2684:(
2662:(
2649:¡
2644:(
2626:(
2604:(
2588:(
2574:(
2559:(
2535:(
2520:(
2497:(
2478:(
2464:(
2435:(
2416:(
2374:.
2364:"
2360:"
2347:.
2276:(
2258:âĄ
2247:)
2243:(
2226:.
2205:)
2180:.
2109:(
2089:)
2085:(
2072:.
2065:.
1966:(
1946:)
1942:(
1929:.
1922:.
1816:(
1779:(
1742:(
1701:(
1678:)
1674:(
1661:.
1654:.
1547:)
1539:(
1519:â
1514::
1510:@
1427:¤
1403:(
1380:(
1350:(
1328:(
1305:(
1247:(
1223:(
1190:(
1184::
1180:@
1162:(
1138:(
1066:(
1055:.
1035:(
1015:(
986:(
958:(
932:(
916:(
890:(
862:(
846:(
812:(
794:¡
789:(
742:(
736::
728:@
709:(
695:(
680:(
647:(
632:(
617:(
602:(
549:(
534:(
519:(
488:(
473:(
451:(
445::
441:@
429:(
404:(
390::
386:@
372:(
299:(
283:(
263:(
242:(
209:(
197:"
193:"
181:(
109:(
86:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.