324:
128:
236:
215:
107:
246:
138:
21:
1205:
1071:
1053:
1021:
995:
966:
952:
811:
793:
779:
765:
544:
510:
76:
343:
390:
363:
348:
1174:
With two maps added, I'm satisfied that this article has an adequate level of illustration to help a non-Swiss reader get a sense of the relative positions, though a photograph of the visible fault itself would still add greatly. Hopefully someone will translate that tectonic map into
English at some
1092:
The fault apparently passes somewhere within view of the image, but it's not clearly recognizable - but the path of the river, from right to left, is forced by the faulting which has diverted the river. It's the closest image on which one can recognize any aspect of faulting. I agree that a map would
820:
I'm not seeing any signs of plagiarism from online
English-language sources in the Earwig tool. It would be better to rewrite various ALL-CAPS names and titles in the sources, but it isn't required. Some of the academic sources are paywalled, so I'll have to AGF on those; they seem generally to be on
644:
The
Engadine Line is only sometimes considered part of the Periadriatic Line, so I wouldn't be comfortable to have it as unqualified assertion in the lead. The source was not terribly clear on what the magnitudes refer to. The geomorphology section actually "flows" from the northeastern sector to the
578:
The "Geomorphology" section needs a more logical flow, perhaps following the fault line in a consistent direction from one end to the other? As it is, some paragraphs seems to be random assortments of factoids with no unifying theme. For example, the second paragraph seems to want to be about the Inn
605:
The sentence "In the Ötz River valley in
Austria, the Engadine Line and the Inntal fault show increased earthquake activity" seems odd, given that nowhere in this article is it said that the Engadine Line extends into the Ötz valley. Is this said under the assumption that the Inntal fault is in fact
561:
The prose repeatedly includes constructions like "0.5–9 kilometres (0.3–5.6 mi) long" as adjectival phrases, and it seems to me that this could be said in a less stilted way, e.g. rather than "represented by 0.5–9 kilometres (0.3–5.6 mi) long northeast-trending fault segments" we could say something
627:
Apparently it's considered acceptable to use "magnitudes" on no particular scale when the figure doesn't need to be very precise. Never mind about that, then! Another good option for smoothing the length descriptors would be using the adjective-phrase option in the
Convert template to get something
708:
in the EL (which is not in the Ötz valley), then please clarify that in the prose. The Kreis
Oberengadin map is great, if only it extended to the entire length of the EL! A coordinate map like the one in Lascar (volcano) would be much better than nothing, if it could show the relative locations of
1249:
There are just a couple of prose issues outstanding: the awkward phrasing around the lengths of fault segments, the unclear sentence mentioning a couple of other fault names, clarification that the Gruf Line extends to the southwest of the
Engadine Line, and clarification if we're saying that
1151:
Schema tettonico is excellent! Better if it were in
English, but maybe someone will translate it at some point; for now, it would definitely help to have that map, with a caption clarifying that the Engadine Line appears near the center, labeled "L.E.". It could even go in an infobox...
562:
like "represented by northeast-trending fault segments running for 0.5–9 kilometres (0.3–5.6 mi)" or "represented by northeast-trending fault segments of 0.5–9 kilometres (0.3–5.6 mi)" or even just "represented by northeast-trending fault segments 0.5–9 kilometres (0.3–5.6 mi) long".
662:
In "Geomorphology" it seems counterintuitive to me to move from downhill to uphill, but that's fine; the flow would probably be more clear if I were more familiar with the exact locations of the various villages and landmarks mentioned (another reason why the article would be
1076:
The sole image has a good license. Reading its caption, I'm not sure I understand the relationship of this photograph to the
Engadine Line; is it saying that (somewhere outside the image) the fault deflects the river (a piece of which appears in the lower left of the image)?
358:
333:
353:
895:
And yet, the map I indicated and all the others I've found appear to show the
Engadine Line passing to the southeast of both the block marked "Silvretta" and the zone marked "Engadine (tectonic) window". How does this claim fit together with the maps?
971:
The article seems to me to cover all the major aspects of an active geological formation (its location, shape and extent, the theorized history of its formation, and contemporary seismic and hydrothermal activity). I don't see any portions that seem
338:
559:(already present and cited in the body). The usage "20–4 kilometres" in the lead seems strange to me; surely it's typical in a range of values to give the lesser value first? Is there some strong reason to reverse the normal convention here?
1000:
The article shows no sign of e.g. exaggerating the fault's importance. I can't see that it unfairly privileges one scientific theory about the geology of the line over another, though I'm not deeply familiar with any controversy that might
1107:
Let's keep looking, because this photograph, though pretty, doesn't show anything to do with a fault line to the eye of a non-geologist. You could perhaps use something in the Commons Category
568:
In "Geology" it currently says that "the names 'Nassereith-Silz fault' and 'Scuols-Vils fault' are used in the context of the Engadine Line". This needs to be more clear. Are these names used
667:
improved by the addition of a map). To help the non-expert reader, let's clarify at the beginning of the fourth paragraph of that section that the Engadine Line continues as the Gruf Line
678:
Gruf Line connection is less that there is controversy and more that only recently has a connection been definitively established. A map would be fine but the only one I can find is
603:
In "Seismicity", it seems to me that "It is possible, but unproven, that the Engadine Line may generate earthquakes" should probably be the first sentence in the section, no?
579:
River and its relationship to the Line, but then it also includes other seemingly unrelated material about "Scarl-Campo rock units", etc. In "Geologic history", what is "the
1210:
A few more prose issues, and it would really, really help to have some maps. Everything else appears to be in order! My notes are finished, so I'm putting this on hold. -
1349:
1134:
1084:
488:
871:
In "Geomorphology" the text says that "the Engadine Line separates the Silvretta covers from the Engadine Window", but that doesn't appear to be true in Schlüchter
532:
428:
395:
660:
It's fine if the lead says that the line is "sometimes considered to be" part of the Periadriatic system, or however you think would be accurate to phrase it.
1364:
418:
302:
292:
1369:
1089:
Likewise for some sort of photograph of the stone layers, where the fault is apparently visibly exposed "at Maloja and at Stragliavita close to Zernez"?
1045:
1344:
536:
528:
197:
187:
32:
1334:
673:
let's also clarify here that only some believe that the Gruf Line is a continuation of the Engadine Line (as stated later in the same paragraph).
677:
Did the Sarmatian and earthquake changes. The Ötz valley however passes close to the EL. If my understanding is correct, the Engadine Line-: -->
1359:
771:
520:
467:
268:
700:
If that's the case (regarding the connection between the Engadine and Gruf lines), then I guess I'm satisfied there. If it's that earthquakes
1354:
679:
1130:
400:
46:
1339:
1063:
478:
1083:
helpful here, speaking as a reader not familiar with the geography or geology of eastern Switzerland. In a brief search I turned up
259:
220:
838:
Hmm, and the checksum digit seems correct, based on my reading of the ISSN logic. Not sure why that error message is appearing... -
1329:
1059:
757:
524:
981:
484:
423:
38:
785:
1279:
Got most of these, but I think the Gruf Line point is clear enough and I am not sure what the "fault segments" refers to.
163:
154:
112:
1126:
87:
880:
Die östliche Begrenzung der Silvrettadecke zum Engardiner Fenster wird durch die sinistrale Engadiner Störung markiert.
564:
In the section "Seismicity" the template {{M|?}} produces the tooltip "Unknown mag. scale"; that should be cleaned up.
1226:
In the surroundings of the excursion area the NE-trending Inntal and Engadin Line show increased earthquake activity
1298:
1263:
1215:
1180:
1157:
1116:
901:
857:
843:
714:
633:
609:
Did the first, but I don't think the second works as there are two dimensional statements there. I can't tell from
461:
556:
516:
606:
the continuation of the Engadine Line? Earlier that is presented as merely "probable" rather than established.
1284:
1233:
1142:
1098:
915:
886:
829:
747:
691:
650:
618:
958:
944:
550:
446:
442:
53:
610:
20:
1294:
1274:
1259:
1211:
1176:
1153:
1112:
897:
853:
839:
710:
629:
457:
93:
803:
799:
628:
hyphenated, like "represented by 0.5–9-kilometre (0.3–5.6 mi) northeast-trending fault segments". -
1087:, which doesn't appear to be free, but something along those lines would add a lot to the article.
267:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1280:
1244:
1229:
1138:
1094:
911:
882:
825:
818:
In the source "MATTMÜLLER" there is a syntax error "Check |issn= value" that should be addressed.
687:
646:
614:
251:
549:
The article complies with all the required section of MoS. In my opinion it really ought to use
580:
852:
Looks like another user got it; I guess the template wanted a hyphen rather than an en dash. -
323:
162:
resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
42:
598:
594:
1035:
683:
588:
143:
1108:
821:
related topics, at least, and in many cases the abstracts support the cited material.
1323:
1228:
so I am not sure how far away the "surroundings" extend. I've added the two images.
158:, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use
235:
214:
137:
127:
106:
329:
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
264:
1258:
at the Engadine Line. The other criteria are met to my satisfaction already. -
584:
241:
133:
1293:
Alright, I made the last small change. This is approved for GA. Good work! -
449:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
159:
1302:
1288:
1267:
1237:
1219:
1184:
1161:
1146:
1120:
1102:
919:
905:
890:
861:
847:
833:
718:
695:
654:
637:
622:
611:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0040195179901768
593:
In "Neotectonics", is it typical in English to use the German plural "
471:
816:
The article has a reference list of citations and a list of sources.
555:
The lead should mention that the Engadine Line is a piece of the
318:
69:
15:
1093:
be helpful but none of these I found is freely licensed.
59:
1224:
Regarding that contested claim on the Ötztal Valley,
1026:
The article is stable and shows no sign of edit wars.
824:
I don't get it. The ISSN exactly matches the source.
263:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1135:File:Geologische Karte des Engadiner Fensters.png
1039:and other media, where possible and appropriate.
597:" rather than some sort of English plural form ("
45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1044:(images are tagged and non-free content have
8:
1125:Maps showing the line in some fashion are
378:
209:
101:
709:all the towns mentioned in "Geography". -
613:what the magnitude scale in question is.
1350:Low-importance GA-Class Geology articles
409:
381:
211:
103:
1254:in the Ötz valley are thought to have
1225:
879:
682:unless you want to construct one like
875:s Figure 17.2 map. What am I missing?
680:File:Karte Kreis Oberengadin 2016.png
576:in the context of the Engadine Line?
7:
1131:File:Schema tettonico delle Alpi.jpg
257:This article is within the scope of
75:
73:
1365:Low-importance Switzerland articles
92:It is of interest to the following
14:
1370:All WikiProject Switzerland pages
277:Knowledge:WikiProject Switzerland
41:. If you can improve it further,
1203:
1069:
1051:
1019:
993:
990:Fair representation without bias
964:
950:
809:
791:
777:
763:
583:"? All I can find is a genus of
553:, but it's not required for GA.
542:
508:
322:
280:Template:WikiProject Switzerland
244:
234:
213:
136:
126:
105:
74:
19:
1345:Low-importance Geology articles
487:for what the criteria are, and
297:This article has been rated as
192:This article has been rated as
1335:Natural sciences good articles
505:(prose, spelling, and grammar)
33:Natural sciences good articles
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
1360:GA-Class Switzerland articles
1303:18:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
1289:20:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
1268:20:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
570:to refer to the Engadine Line
271:and see a list of open tasks.
172:Knowledge:WikiProject Geology
1355:WikiProject Geology articles
1238:21:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
1220:17:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
1204:
1185:03:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
1162:17:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
1147:19:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
1127:File:Alps geology map en.jpg
1121:16:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
1103:16:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
1070:
1052:
1020:
994:
965:
951:
920:19:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
906:16:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
891:19:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
862:16:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
848:18:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
834:16:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
810:
792:
778:
764:
719:17:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
696:19:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
655:19:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
638:18:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
623:16:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
574:to refer to some other fault
543:
509:
472:17:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
175:Template:WikiProject Geology
1109:Geological maps of the Alps
704:in the Ötz valley may have
1386:
303:project's importance scale
198:project's importance scale
1340:GA-Class Geology articles
557:Periadriatic Fault System
296:
229:
191:
121:
100:
1330:Knowledge good articles
498:reasonably well written
260:WikiProject Switzerland
587:. Should that be "the
551:Template:Infobox fault
491:for what they are not)
447:Talk:Engadine Line/GA1
82:This article is rated
57:: November 11, 2020. (
1033:It is illustrated by
982:neutral point of view
936:broad in its coverage
166:for more information.
39:good article criteria
283:Switzerland articles
1046:fair use rationales
572:, or are they used
155:WikiProject Geology
1016:No edit wars, etc.
743:factually accurate
645:southwestern one.
252:Switzerland portal
150:Talk:Engadine Line
88:content assessment
1064:suitable captions
910:I dunno, really.
758:reference section
437:
436:
372:
371:
317:
316:
313:
312:
309:
308:
208:
207:
204:
203:
68:
67:
64:
1377:
1295:Bryan Rutherford
1278:
1275:Bryanrutherford0
1260:Bryan Rutherford
1248:
1212:Bryan Rutherford
1207:
1206:
1177:Bryan Rutherford
1154:Bryan Rutherford
1113:Bryan Rutherford
1073:
1072:
1055:
1054:
1023:
1022:
997:
996:
968:
967:
954:
953:
898:Bryan Rutherford
854:Bryan Rutherford
840:Bryan Rutherford
813:
812:
795:
794:
781:
780:
772:reliable sources
767:
766:
711:Bryan Rutherford
684:Lascar (volcano)
669:to the southwest
630:Bryan Rutherford
546:
545:
512:
511:
458:Bryanrutherford0
391:Copyvio detector
379:
326:
319:
285:
284:
281:
278:
275:
254:
249:
248:
247:
238:
231:
230:
225:
217:
210:
180:
179:
178:Geology articles
176:
173:
170:
146:
141:
140:
130:
123:
122:
117:
109:
102:
85:
79:
78:
77:
70:
62:
60:Reviewed version
51:
23:
16:
1385:
1384:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1320:
1319:
1272:
1242:
1133:and indirectly
1079:A map would be
1060:appropriate use
979:It follows the
441:This review is
433:
405:
377:
282:
279:
276:
273:
272:
250:
245:
243:
223:
177:
174:
171:
168:
167:
142:
135:
115:
86:on Knowledge's
83:
58:
12:
11:
5:
1383:
1381:
1373:
1372:
1367:
1362:
1357:
1352:
1347:
1342:
1337:
1332:
1322:
1321:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
850:
770:(citations to
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
566:
493:
492:
452:
451:
435:
434:
432:
431:
426:
421:
415:
412:
411:
407:
406:
404:
403:
401:External links
398:
393:
387:
384:
383:
376:
373:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
361:
356:
351:
346:
341:
336:
330:
327:
315:
314:
311:
310:
307:
306:
299:Low-importance
295:
289:
288:
286:
269:the discussion
256:
255:
239:
227:
226:
224:Low‑importance
218:
206:
205:
202:
201:
194:Low-importance
190:
184:
183:
181:
148:
147:
144:Geology portal
131:
119:
118:
116:Low‑importance
110:
98:
97:
91:
80:
66:
65:
50:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1382:
1371:
1368:
1366:
1363:
1361:
1358:
1356:
1353:
1351:
1348:
1346:
1343:
1341:
1338:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1328:
1327:
1325:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1281:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1276:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1246:
1245:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1241:
1240:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1230:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1227:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1208:
1201:
1198:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1173:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1139:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1095:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1091:
1090:
1088:
1086:
1082:
1075:
1074:
1067:
1065:
1061:
1049:
1047:
1041:
1040:
1038:
1037:
1032:
1025:
1024:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1007:
999:
998:
991:
988:
987:
985:
983:
978:
970:
969:
962:
960:
948:
946:
945:major aspects
940:
939:
937:
933:
921:
917:
913:
912:Jo-Jo Eumerus
909:
908:
907:
903:
899:
894:
893:
892:
888:
884:
883:Jo-Jo Eumerus
881:
878:
877:
876:
874:
869:
863:
859:
855:
851:
849:
845:
841:
837:
836:
835:
831:
827:
826:Jo-Jo Eumerus
823:
822:
819:
815:
814:
807:
805:
801:
789:
787:
775:
773:
761:
759:
753:
752:
750:
749:
744:
740:
720:
716:
712:
707:
703:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
688:Jo-Jo Eumerus
685:
681:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
661:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
647:Jo-Jo Eumerus
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
635:
631:
626:
625:
624:
620:
616:
615:Jo-Jo Eumerus
612:
608:
607:
604:
600:
596:
592:
590:
586:
582:
575:
571:
567:
565:
560:
558:
552:
548:
547:
540:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
506:
502:
501:
499:
495:
494:
490:
486:
482:
480:
476:
475:
474:
473:
469:
466:
463:
459:
456:
450:
448:
444:
439:
438:
430:
427:
425:
422:
420:
417:
416:
414:
413:
408:
402:
399:
397:
394:
392:
389:
388:
386:
385:
380:
374:
365:
362:
360:
357:
355:
352:
350:
347:
345:
342:
340:
337:
335:
332:
331:
328:
325:
321:
320:
304:
300:
294:
291:
290:
287:
270:
266:
262:
261:
253:
242:
240:
237:
233:
232:
228:
222:
219:
216:
212:
199:
195:
189:
186:
185:
182:
165:
161:
157:
156:
151:
145:
139:
134:
132:
129:
125:
124:
120:
114:
111:
108:
104:
99:
95:
89:
81:
72:
71:
61:
56:
55:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
27:Engadine Line
25:
22:
18:
17:
1255:
1251:
1250:earthquakes
1199:
1193:
1080:
1078:
1057:
1043:
1034:
1015:
1009:
989:
980:
956:
942:
935:
872:
870:
817:
797:
783:
769:
755:
746:
742:
705:
701:
672:
668:
664:
659:
602:
577:
573:
569:
563:
554:
514:
504:
497:
477:
464:
454:
453:
440:
429:Instructions
349:Engadiner-DE
298:
258:
193:
164:project page
153:
149:
94:WikiProjects
52:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
529:word choice
443:transcluded
359:Engadine-EN
274:Switzerland
265:Switzerland
221:Switzerland
152:is part of
1324:Categories
1256:originated
972:off-topic.
804:plagiarism
748:verifiable
706:originated
396:Authorship
382:GA toolbox
354:Engadin-EN
344:Engadin-DE
37:under the
1200:Pass/Fail
1081:extremely
665:very much
595:sackungen
589:Sarmatian
581:Sarmatium
455:Reviewer:
419:Templates
410:Reviewing
375:GA Review
1175:point! -
599:sackungs
468:contribs
424:Criteria
84:GA-class
47:reassess
1194:Overall
959:focused
873:et al.'
800:copyvio
533:fiction
339:Gruf-EN
334:Gruf-DE
301:on the
196:on the
169:Geology
160:geology
113:Geology
1036:images
1010:stable
1008:It is
1001:exist.
984:policy
934:It is
741:It is
535:, and
525:layout
496:It is
481:review
90:scale.
54:Review
1062:with
585:crabs
537:lists
483:(see
445:from
1299:talk
1285:talk
1264:talk
1252:felt
1234:talk
1216:talk
1181:talk
1158:talk
1143:talk
1117:talk
1099:talk
1085:this
916:talk
902:talk
887:talk
858:talk
844:talk
830:talk
802:and
745:and
715:talk
702:felt
692:talk
651:talk
634:talk
619:talk
601:")?
521:lead
519:for
489:here
485:here
462:talk
1111:? -
517:MoS
293:Low
188:Low
49:it.
1326::
1301:)
1287:)
1266:)
1236:)
1218:)
1202::
1196::
1183:)
1160:)
1145:)
1137:.
1129:,
1119:)
1101:)
1068::
1056:b
1050::
1042:a
1018::
1012:.
992::
986:.
963::
955:b
949::
941:a
938:.
918:)
904:)
889:)
860:)
846:)
832:)
808::
796:d
790::
786:OR
782:c
776::
768:b
762::
754:a
751:.
717:)
694:)
686:.
671:;
653:)
636:)
621:)
591:"?
541::
531:,
527:,
523:,
513:b
507::
503:a
500:.
479:GA
470:)
364:IT
63:).
1297:(
1283:(
1277::
1273:@
1262:(
1247::
1243:@
1232:(
1214:(
1179:(
1156:(
1152:-
1141:(
1115:(
1097:(
1066:)
1058:(
1048:)
961:)
957:(
947:)
943:(
914:(
900:(
896:-
885:(
856:(
842:(
828:(
806:)
798:(
788:)
784:(
774:)
760:)
756:(
713:(
690:(
649:(
632:(
617:(
539:)
515:(
465:·
460:(
305:.
200:.
96::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
