Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Eastern Pilbara Craton

Source đź“ť

579:
basic broad overview of the topic such that anyone who may stumble on this page may understand what your page is on. I thought this section was done well, I liked the break down of strata. I found your history and formation section very informative and well done with citations. This section however could be touched up in terms of wording in a couple of sentences but over all well done! The Geological Relevance section seemed to be your weakest point on the page due to overall vagueness of what is being said. I understand that studying this location will give in site on earths geology, but maybe if you were to add specific research that has been done or what in specific was been discovered in early earth research.
227: 80: 177: 288: 267: 298: 434: 94: 53: 104: 201: 73: 379: 22: 246: 542:
First off this is a great page with lots of detailed information. However, I don't know if the average person would be able to read and comprehend the topic and some of the the vocabulary. Maybe try to explain in more detail some of the topic you brought up that don't have their own wiki page. Also I
578:
Overall great page! For starters you may consider adding a title to the introductory paragraph which seems to the location and basic geologic background of the region. This portion could potentially just go along with the initial descriptions section. There is some importance on attempting to give a
520:
Overall, the term is well interpreted, and through the text the author offers lot of link which point to other terms. I will recommend more information in geologic background and give a separate section for tectonics or the revolution of the region. From this page, I've also learned from the author:
516:
The author gave a clear and concise decryption of the Eastern Pilbara Crato. However, I think there is relatively less information in "tectonic" or to say "dynamic" and "evolution" (the author did provide. For example, in the section of history and formation, but I think it eoulf be better to give a
628:
In your introduction, you might want to be a little more specific about why the "eastern" portion of the Pilbara Craton is separate from the entire craton. For example, is it the only area that contains a greenstone belt? Is it because that is the only place the rocks are exposed?
491:
The figure is awesome since it provide two scale map view, helping readers effectively locate the area. I recommend add a section like geological settings (maybe take some information from the history?) before this section or as a sub-heading within this section
453:
This is a well written and structured article. I enjoyed reading it and looking at the various pictures and diagrams. There are only a couple of suggestions which you might wish to consider. First, there are multiple red colored links under sections
637:
Consider renaming the title of this section... Because it encompasses a lot about the area. Maybe "overview" or "physical evidence" or even "Description of the landscape." I can't really come up with a good title, but just think about it.
671:
You really did a great job creating a concise paper that really gave good information about your subject. Well done! Just a few links need to be checked (they are red on your page) to make sure the subject actually has a wiki page.
705:
In the head of your article you suggests that two different hypotheses have been made to explain the structure in Pilbara: vertical tectonics and subduction accretion arcs. But only vertical tectonics theory is introduced in
693:
section you have 4 subtitles: Archean Crust; Granitic Domes and Greenstone Belts; TTG; Regional Structures. I think those subtitles is not really a parallelism so you might better to put it that way: 1. Geological Setting =:
482:
The author gave a concise but informed introduction which enables one has no background knowledge on this topic get information quickly. At this point, the author did better than me, I only did "briefly" but not informed.
543:
like your figure, however, you might want to reference it on your page and explain it in more depth so people will have a better idea of what it's showing. But overall great page with a lot of good information.
469:
you could try to create a real list, not just one integrated into the paragraph itself. I enjoyed viewing the pictures and the diagrams were simple and easy to understand. Great list of references.
686:
Your article is a good introduction to Eastern Pilbara Craton. The content is informative and the page layout is good. Some suggestions may help you to improve this article to a better one.
652:
Short, concise, easy to understand. Great section. Again, consider putting dates into bullet points for easier viewing/ understanding. (I'll probably do this for my own page, actually!)
641:
For anything that has a data attached to it, it might be a cool idea to bullet the points you are stating in paragraph form. Just a though, it looks really good how you have it though.
426: 757: 191: 782: 702:
section you've mentioned two places which didn't show in any of your figures, you may want to point them out: Shaw Granitic Complex; The Warrawagine Granitic Complex.
72: 762: 675:
I think if you created a timeline portion of the paper, highlighting when certain rocks were formed, that would be a good way to keep the information organized.
167: 752: 792: 588:
The earlier commenters have given some good suggestions. I would like to see a more detailed geological map, with say 10 to 20 different geological units.
422: 357: 747: 157: 186: 63: 777: 347: 767: 787: 695:
Archean Crust; Granitic Domes and Greenstone Belts 2. TTG 3. Regional Structures. It's just a suggestion and you might feel it unnecessary.
742: 79: 521:
1) provide figures in different scales to be more precise and "reader-friendly"; 2) provide links for other terms throughout the text.
133: 120: 58: 772: 591:
Please explain the neighboring regions, there is a bit more to the south east and west, do these parts of the Pilbara have a name?
559: 323: 314: 272: 33: 508:
This section is useful and provides readers controversial views and research in the region. I would learn from the author.
611: 597:
The geologic relevance section is a bit of a teaser, suggesting there is a lot more, but we don't get to see it.
39: 528: 547: 410: 394: 724: 607: 555: 226: 21: 600:
Avoid using "we" or other first person, as this is an encyclopedia rather than a teaching material.
603:
The geologic relevance and granitic domes section are both missing references. Please add them in!
524: 129: 713:
Your cross section and schematic figure of Pilbara are nice, you can increase the size of them!
517:
separate section to tectonics), while the author give quite detailed information in lithology.
378: 236: 217: 322:
resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
728: 109: 176: 720: 551: 415: 399: 594:
A timeline would be good for this, as the ages are far from familiar geological periods.
303: 736: 318:, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use 297: 287: 266: 615: 563: 532: 93: 52: 293: 200: 99: 389: 125: 625:
Hey Erinn... So glad I got to review your page! You did such a good job!
319: 213: 663:
Great conclusion, really reveals the importance of your page.
373: 15: 432: 225: 199: 175: 655:
Your images are great and really add to the overall page.
427:
Template:Did you know nominations/Eastern Pilbara Craton
465:
These links do not work. Secondly, under the section
425:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 124:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 423:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2015/February 132:. If you would like to participate, visit the 8: 261: 47: 758:Low-importance Western Australia articles 402:). The text of the entry was as follows: 783:Low-importance B-Class Geology articles 433: 263: 49: 19: 763:WikiProject Western Australia articles 793:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles 421:A record of the entry may be seen at 142:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Australia 7: 332:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Geology 38:It is of interest to the following 753:B-Class Western Australia articles 218:State Library of Western Australia 208:Need help improving this article? 14: 748:Low-importance Australia articles 710:section. Please add the another. 377: 296: 286: 265: 244: 102: 92: 78: 71: 51: 20: 778:Low-importance Geology articles 418:that are 3.6 billion years old? 352:This article has been rated as 162:This article has been rated as 768:WikiProject Australia articles 388:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s 240:can be contacted via email to 145:Template:WikiProject Australia 1: 729:07:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC) 583:Comments from Graeme Bartlett 252:for non-editorial assistance. 214:National Library of Australia 187:WikiProject Western Australia 184:This article is supported by 788:WikiProject Geology articles 616:10:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC) 564:03:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 533:21:03, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 456:Partial Convection Overturn, 398:column on 25 February 2015 ( 335:Template:WikiProject Geology 310:Talk:Eastern Pilbara Craton 237:Wikimedia Australia chapter 809: 743:B-Class Australia articles 358:project's importance scale 168:project's importance scale 351: 281: 245: 233: 207: 183: 161: 87: 46: 773:B-Class Geology articles 678: 130:Australia-related topics 500:This section is great. 118:is within the scope of 620: 473:Hongcheng Guo's review 472: 448: 438: 411:Eastern Pilbara Craton 386:Eastern Pilbara Craton 230: 204: 180: 116:Eastern Pilbara Craton 28:This article is rated 708:Formation and History 648:Formation and history 496:Formation and History 436: 326:for more information. 229: 203: 179: 121:WikiProject Australia 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 644:GREAT TTG section!! 414:contains pieces of 315:WikiProject Geology 659:Geologic Relevance 504:Geologic relevance 463:Region Structures. 439: 231: 205: 181: 148:Australia articles 34:content assessment 679:Jiawei's Feedback 567: 550:comment added by 443: 442: 372: 371: 368: 367: 364: 363: 260: 259: 256: 255: 64:Western Australia 800: 566: 544: 435: 381: 374: 340: 339: 338:Geology articles 336: 333: 330: 306: 301: 300: 290: 283: 282: 277: 269: 262: 251: 250:wikimedia.org.au 249: 248: 247: 150: 149: 146: 143: 140: 112: 110:Australia portal 107: 106: 105: 96: 89: 88: 83: 82: 81: 76: 75: 74: 69: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 808: 807: 803: 802: 801: 799: 798: 797: 733: 732: 681: 669: 661: 650: 635: 623: 608:Graeme Bartlett 585: 576: 545: 540: 514: 506: 498: 489: 480: 475: 451: 449:Carson's Review 437:Knowledge (XXG) 337: 334: 331: 328: 327: 302: 295: 275: 243: 241: 210:Ask a Librarian 147: 144: 141: 138: 137: 108: 103: 101: 77: 70: 67: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 806: 804: 796: 795: 790: 785: 780: 775: 770: 765: 760: 755: 750: 745: 735: 734: 680: 677: 668: 665: 660: 657: 649: 646: 634: 631: 622: 621:Annie's Review 619: 605: 604: 601: 598: 595: 592: 589: 584: 581: 575: 572: 570: 539: 536: 513: 510: 505: 502: 497: 494: 488: 485: 479: 476: 474: 471: 459:Archean Crust, 450: 447: 445: 441: 440: 430: 420: 419: 382: 370: 369: 366: 365: 362: 361: 354:Low-importance 350: 344: 343: 341: 308: 307: 304:Geology portal 291: 279: 278: 276:Low‑importance 270: 258: 257: 254: 253: 232: 222: 221: 206: 196: 195: 192:Low-importance 182: 172: 171: 164:Low-importance 160: 154: 153: 151: 114: 113: 97: 85: 84: 68:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 805: 794: 791: 789: 786: 784: 781: 779: 776: 774: 771: 769: 766: 764: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 749: 746: 744: 741: 740: 738: 731: 730: 726: 722: 717: 714: 711: 709: 703: 701: 696: 692: 687: 684: 676: 673: 666: 664: 658: 656: 653: 647: 645: 642: 639: 632: 630: 626: 618: 617: 613: 609: 602: 599: 596: 593: 590: 587: 586: 582: 580: 573: 571: 568: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 537: 535: 534: 530: 526: 525:Hongcheng Guo 522: 518: 511: 509: 503: 501: 495: 493: 486: 484: 477: 470: 468: 464: 460: 457: 446: 431: 428: 424: 417: 413: 412: 408:... that the 407: 404: 403: 401: 397: 396: 391: 387: 383: 380: 376: 375: 359: 355: 349: 346: 345: 342: 325: 321: 317: 316: 311: 305: 299: 294: 292: 289: 285: 284: 280: 274: 271: 268: 264: 239: 238: 228: 224: 223: 219: 215: 211: 202: 198: 197: 193: 190:(assessed as 189: 188: 178: 174: 173: 169: 165: 159: 156: 155: 152: 135: 131: 127: 123: 122: 117: 111: 100: 98: 95: 91: 90: 86: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 718: 715: 712: 707: 704: 699: 698:Also in the 697: 690: 688: 685: 682: 674: 670: 662: 654: 651: 643: 640: 636: 627: 624: 606: 577: 569: 546:— Preceding 541: 538:Tyler Hebert 523: 519: 515: 507: 499: 490: 481: 478:Introduction 466: 462: 458: 455: 452: 444: 409: 406:Did you know 405: 395:Did you know 393: 385: 384:A fact from 353: 324:project page 313: 309: 234: 209: 185: 163: 134:project page 119: 115: 40:WikiProjects 700:Description 691:Description 633:Description 487:Description 467:Description 416:Earth crust 400:check views 312:is part of 737:Categories 721:MichaelZuo 716:Good job! 683:Hi, Erinn 552:T.J.Hebert 512:In general 574:Ben Durel 390:Main Page 216:, or the 139:Australia 126:Australia 59:Australia 560:contribs 548:unsigned 719:Jiawei 689:In the 667:Overall 392:in the 356:on the 329:Geology 320:geology 273:Geology 212:at the 166:on the 30:B-class 36:scale. 725:talk 612:talk 556:talk 529:talk 461:and 242:help 235:The 128:and 694:--> 348:Low 158:Low 739:: 727:) 614:) 562:) 558:• 531:) 194:). 62:: 723:( 610:( 554:( 527:( 429:. 360:. 220:. 170:. 136:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Australia
Western Australia
WikiProject icon
Australia portal
WikiProject Australia
Australia
Australia-related topics
project page
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Western Australia
Low-importance
Note icon
National Library of Australia
State Library of Western Australia
Note icon
Wikimedia Australia chapter
WikiProject icon
Geology
WikiProject icon
icon
Geology portal
WikiProject Geology
geology
project page

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑