Knowledge

Talk:Etymologiae

Source 📝

128: 107: 1530:, full texts of which were no longer copied and thus were lost. It was one of the most popular compendia in medieval libraries" (emphasis mine). This is referenced to: Barney, Stephen A.; Lewis, W. J.; Beach, J. A.; Berghof, O. (2006). The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-511-21969-6. I think that "superseded" and "supplanted" are pretty equivalent, particularly since the full texts were lost and no longer available, whereas 398: 377: 611: 595: 138: 644: 240: 331: 306: 21: 1453: 1445: 1437: 1421: 1408: 1396: 1376: 76: 230: 212: 497: 466: 697: 507: 1467:
I have concluded the review and am passing the article: I think that for the next stage (FA level) the article needs to give more of an analytical account of the Etymologiae, including their social, historical and literary context, and their place in the history of encyclopedias and knowledge, and it
1404:
all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow
1559:
the preservation of classical texts that it largely supplanted than for the insight it offers into medieval thought." In other words, it is agreed by everyone that it did the supplanting; it is not at all agreed that scholars recognise its importance for that fact. The opposite may well be (I think
996:
It definitely is an improvement. I think it still could do with some fleshing out as far as sources allow - the section is mostly about Isidore and not so much about the intellectual milieu of the time or about the function of encyclopedias. Why is Pliny the Elder not linked anywhere, and why is it
826:
I think this article is of vital importance to wikipedia, being about one of the earliest efforts to undertake a project similar to our own. I am very thankful that someone has taken the time to bring it up to this level of quality. It should honestly be a FA, given its importance to our own sphere
964:
I missed a little bit of historical context surrounding its production - how and why was it made? What gave Isidore the idea or inspiration? Who paid for it? How long did it take? Who helped him? Why were in that period interested in encyclopedias like this? What was Spain like in this period, and
924:
by Barney and others into modern English, and it is cited many times, so it is placed in the Bibliography. I have used the sfn/Harvard templates to automate links between the short form references and the book, so like the other references it is now possible to navigate directly to online sources,
888:
The citation format is odd. The notes include both short and long references, but one book is separated out into the bibliography. I think the best solution is to take all long citations into the bibliography and use only short citations in the inline references - possibly excepting web-only
1278:
There are many paragraphs that have no citations throughout the article - but especially in the contents section. I understand why the contents it section might not feel necessary to cite, since it summarizes the actual book - but outside of that section all paragraphs need at least one
1187:
I think the section on manuscript is too short, and not coherent enough as prose. I actually don't understand what it says - untill the reference to Codex Gigas - and even then it is not very informative overall, but seems to assume a lot of background knowledge.
1582:, which is pretty much the type of rudeness that BRD is meant to prevent. The modern scholars, according to the article (and references 48, 47, and 4) all imply that the main longterm impact of the work is the reflection into the medieval mindset. 1525:
It says right in the current text (which the reverting editor says he wrote himself) that "hrough the Middle Ages Etymologiae was the textbook most in use, regarded so highly as a repository of classical learning that, in a great measure,
1742:
Pope John Paul is considering naming St. Isidore of Seville the patron saint of Internet users and computer programmers, Vatican sources said on Tuesday. Saint Isidore was nominated two years ago but the Holy See has yet to make a final
1560:
is) true, namely that scholars are incredibly interested in the fragments it preserved. If you want to maintain that they aren't interested in the fragments but in the fact of supplanting, you definitely need sources for that.
1039:
Hmm, I found another source stating that Solinus' work was also an encyclopedia, so maybe that claim is not true. Definitely I think the article could use some material on the Etymologiae's place in the history of
1069:
Cool. There is a book by Andrew Brown on the history of encyclopedias, it mentions Pliny and Knowledge - but there is no snippet view so I can't see if it mentions the Etymologiae too. But it probably does.
1026:
This made me wonder if his citations to Pliny actually are to the Natural History? That would be interesting I think. Also do we know anything about whether Pliny's natural history was a direct inspiration?
852:
The lead is not an adequate summary of the article. It should include material about the structure of the contents of the encyclopedia - its books and general format. And also its manuscript and printing
1329:
Thanks for your improvements. I will be traveling the next three days and will probably not be able to review the changes until Friday, so you can take your time with the improvements, keep up the good
1506:
I have never made a suggestion for a Knowledge article before so apologies if this is the wrong way to point this out, but Tertullian was a Christian author, not a Pagan one as it says in the article.
448: 941:
I still think it is odd not to move the long refs into the bibliography just because they are only cited once - I don't know any style guides that do that. But if this is how you like it then ok.
1857: 602: 476: 1238:
The section on "contents" is quite odd in the way that it is broken in to short sections on each book. Maybe a different organization might make sense, one without a header for each book?
997:
not mentioned that his was the only other previous encyclopedia? Not something I will fail the article for, but something I think can be worked on for subsequent levels of improvement.
1862: 1136:
I liked that edit of yours. I looks to me as if Brehaut can provide some analytical content in general which I think will be needed for further improvements beyond the GA level.
1872: 1852: 1877: 1100:
Yes this was more for something more general about the Etymologiae's place in the history of the encyclopedic genre. Here is a link to another work that may be useful
528:
on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
735: 32: 827:
of interest as encyclopedists. So thanks for that! However the vitality means we can't skimp on quality, and there are some things that can definitely be improved:
1867: 1797: 1731:
appears to have captured a citogenesis in the wild! I've been waiting for ages to see one. I'm not sure that this one stands being pinned to the board though?
1807: 725: 194: 184: 1847: 702: 565: 555: 1817: 618: 480: 1764:
I went to update the sentence with this extra information but before saving, concluded that the whole thing is off-topic, and furthermore violates
1713:
Diplè : nos copistes placent ce signe dans les livres des gens d'Eglise pour séparer ou pour signaler les citations tirées des Saintes Ecritures."
1634:
The single quotation mark is traced to Ancient Greek practice, adopted and adapted by monastic copyists. In his seventh century encyclopedia, The
1538:. That two separate and very different editors disagree with the reverting editor does not appear to have occurred to him. So...let's discuss. 1837: 1802: 438: 160: 1116:
Ok, why not, said that Isidore fits into the classical tradition (i.e. not observational research), Brehaut is certainly right on that point.
1842: 1654:) " ⟩ Diplé: our copyists place this sign in the books of the people of the Church, to separate or to indicate the quotations drawn from the 530: 337: 311: 1468:
also needs I think to cite a little bit broader in the literature. It is however well within the GA criteria and deserves to be promoted.
1053:
Pliny's was by far the largest (and most influential). The Etym.'s Books XII, XIII and XIV are all based largely on the Natural History.
1827: 260: 46: 965:
was there anything special about the period and historical context that favored the production? That kind of thing, I think is missing.
1812: 1507: 1662:
Even though the source doesn't say so, would it be reasonable to say "In Volume 1 of his seventh ..."? Is "Diplé" the correct word?--
707: 151: 112: 1832: 1792: 1101: 520: 471: 414: 264: 1822: 1773: 1754: 1667: 730: 38: 925:
where available. I hope you'll agree this elegantly solves the formatting question and provides the "quality" we all desire.
1630:. I suspect that it is volume 1 from the table given in the article. To save you the effort, here is the relevant section: 1388:
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
127: 106: 1693: 774: 87: 1401:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
405: 382: 254: 217: 1769: 1768:
because it doesn't summarise body content. I moved the citations to the article about Isidore, where it belongs. --
1750: 1728: 1663: 1458:
images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
657: 666: 1601: 1565: 1511: 1489: 1352: 1301: 1250: 1210: 1121: 1087: 1058: 1015: 987: 930: 911: 875: 839: 805: 1442:
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
749: 1385:
the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
20: 93: 1737: 753: 342: 316: 268: 53: 1712:
Dans le chapitre sur les symboles graphiques, Isidore évoque la diplè (chevron, en grec) : " : -->
413:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
159:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1643: 1597: 1561: 1531: 1485: 1452: 1444: 1436: 1420: 1407: 1395: 1375: 1348: 1297: 1246: 1206: 1117: 1083: 1054: 1011: 983: 926: 907: 871: 835: 801: 672: 143: 1555:
Please maintain politeness. What the text, and the cited source, does not say is that "Scholars
1578:'s talk page, and I am quite shocked that you found it more polite to re-revert than to follow 1296:
Yes, contents and 'plot' sections are generally agreed to be self-citing. I've cited the rest.
512: 42: 1587: 1543: 1473: 1335: 1315: 1284: 1264: 1224: 1193: 1141: 1108: 1074: 1045: 1031: 1002: 970: 946: 894: 858: 789: 768: 668: 643: 272: 156: 137: 1429:
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
1765: 1655: 1623: 397: 376: 610: 594: 1786: 1651: 1579: 1535: 1434:
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
1010:
Wikilinked Pliny, and mentioned the Natural History! And one or two other links too.
906:
Noted. This is outside the GA criteria but I will try to find a sensible resolution.
239: 245: 1637: 1583: 1575: 1539: 1469: 1331: 1311: 1280: 1260: 1220: 1189: 1137: 1104: 1070: 1041: 1027: 998: 966: 942: 890: 854: 785: 764: 330: 305: 1698: 982:
Added a Context section, which may begin to hint at your excellent questions.
525: 502: 235: 133: 1484:
Thank you very much for the review, and for the suggestions for the future.
784:
This article looks incredibly interesting, and I will be happy to review it.
756:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 229: 211: 1528:
it superseded the use of the individual works of the classics themselves
670: 524:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 1622:
There is a reference based on a (respected) French magazine source at
259:. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can 496: 465: 1777: 1758: 1671: 1605: 1591: 1569: 1547: 1515: 1493: 1476: 1356: 1338: 1318: 1305: 1287: 1267: 1254: 1227: 1214: 1196: 1144: 1125: 1111: 1091: 1077: 1062: 1048: 1034: 1019: 1005: 991: 973: 949: 934: 915: 897: 879: 861: 843: 809: 792: 778: 410: 1574:
My message is considerably more polite than the one you left on
673: 637: 69: 15: 1461:
images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
609: 593: 1536:
the standard process for discussing disagreement on content
1596:
I've added a mention of the medieval mindset in the lead.
59: 1259:
Much nicer in terms of readability and layout I think.
409:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 155:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 576: 1694:"Deux-points et guillemets : le " procès-verbal "" 1858:Mid-importance philosophical literature articles 1534:disagrees and would rather edit-war than follow 340:, a project which is currently considered to be 45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 1632: 1082:The use of Pliny's NH is cited in the article. 271:. To improve this article, please refer to the 1738:"Isidore — Patron Saint Of Internet?" 920:The 'one book' is the critical translation of 8: 1863:Philosophical literature task force articles 1521:Whether or not it supplanted other resources 834:Thank you. All the same, this is just a GA! 1873:Mid-importance Medieval philosophy articles 1635: 1426:it addresses the main aspects of the topic; 1853:GA-Class philosophical literature articles 685: 573: 460: 371: 300: 267:. To use this banner, please refer to the 206: 101: 1205:Rewritten, new wikilinks and references. 1692:Pedro Uribe Echeverria (7 August 2009). 265:discuss matters related to book articles 1878:Medieval philosophy task force articles 1684: 716: 688: 462: 373: 302: 273:relevant guideline for the type of work 208: 103: 1736:CBSNEWS.com staff (February 6, 2001). 534:about philosophy content on Knowledge. 1868:GA-Class Medieval philosophy articles 1798:Language and literature good articles 1393:Verifiable with no original research: 352:Knowledge:WikiProject Reference works 33:Language and literature good articles 7: 1450:Illustrated, if possible, by images: 518:This article is within the scope of 403:This article is within the scope of 355:Template:WikiProject Reference works 336:This article is within the scope of 251:This article is within the scope of 149:This article is within the scope of 75: 73: 1808:Mid-importance Middle Ages articles 92:It is of interest to the following 1848:Mid-importance Philosophy articles 1405:the scientific citation guidelines 14: 1818:All WikiProject Middle Ages pages 1646:describes their use of the Greek 1557:recognize its importance less for 1413:it contains no original research. 169:Knowledge:WikiProject Middle Ages 41:. If you can improve it further, 1451: 1443: 1435: 1419: 1406: 1394: 1374: 800:Many thanks for taking this on. 642: 540:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy 505: 495: 464: 396: 375: 329: 304: 238: 228: 210: 172:Template:WikiProject Middle Ages 136: 126: 105: 74: 19: 560:This article has been rated as 543:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 443:This article has been rated as 189:This article has been rated as 29:has been listed as one of the 1: 1838:Low-importance Latin articles 1803:GA-Class Middle Ages articles 1778:20:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 1759:23:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 417:and see a list of open tasks. 163:and see a list of open tasks. 1843:GA-Class Philosophy articles 1749:Yes, I know, spoilsport. -- 1606:06:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC) 1592:22:05, 3 October 2018 (UTC) 1570:21:17, 3 October 2018 (UTC) 1548:21:00, 3 October 2018 (UTC) 423:Knowledge:WikiProject Latin 338:WikiProject Reference works 281:Knowledge:WikiProject Books 1894: 1828:WikiProject Books articles 1516:12:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 566:project's importance scale 426:Template:WikiProject Latin 284:Template:WikiProject Books 195:project's importance scale 1813:GA-Class history articles 617: 601: 572: 559: 490: 442: 391: 324: 223: 188: 121: 100: 1672:22:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC) 1494:05:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 1477:20:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1357:19:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 1339:17:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 1319:18:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1306:06:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 1288:23:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 1268:18:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1255:06:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 1228:18:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1215:14:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 1197:23:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 1145:19:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1126:19:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1112:19:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1092:19:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1078:19:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1063:19:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1049:19:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1035:19:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1020:19:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 1006:18:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 992:16:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 974:23:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 950:18:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 935:09:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC) 916:06:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 898:23:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 880:19:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 862:23:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 844:06:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 810:07:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 793:03:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 779:03:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 603:Philosophical literature 358:Reference works articles 1833:GA-Class Latin articles 1793:Knowledge good articles 577:Associated task forces: 152:WikiProject Middle Ages 1823:GA-Class Book articles 1660: 1636: 1626:which quotes from the 1624:Quotation mark#History 1618:Typography in volume 1 1418:Broad in its coverage: 614: 598: 521:WikiProject Philosophy 82:This article is rated 1770:John Maynard Friedman 1751:John Maynard Friedman 1729:Daphne Preston-Kendal 1664:John Maynard Friedman 1245:Removed the headers. 613: 597: 39:good article criteria 754:Talk:Etymologiae/GA1 175:Middle Ages articles 619:Medieval philosophy 546:Philosophy articles 1644:Isidore of Seville 615: 599: 531:general discussion 144:Middle Ages portal 88:content assessment 744: 743: 679: 678: 636: 635: 632: 631: 628: 627: 624: 623: 513:Philosophy portal 459: 458: 455: 454: 406:WikiProject Latin 370: 369: 366: 365: 299: 298: 295: 294: 255:WikiProject Books 205: 204: 201: 200: 68: 67: 64: 57:: May 29, 2015. ( 1885: 1745: 1716: 1715: 1709: 1707: 1689: 1641: 1455: 1447: 1439: 1423: 1410: 1398: 1378: 698:Copyvio detector 686: 674: 646: 638: 584: 574: 548: 547: 544: 541: 538: 515: 510: 509: 508: 499: 492: 491: 486: 483: 468: 461: 449:importance scale 431: 430: 427: 424: 421: 400: 393: 392: 387: 379: 372: 360: 359: 356: 353: 350: 333: 326: 325: 320: 308: 301: 289: 288: 285: 282: 279: 261:join the project 248: 243: 242: 232: 225: 224: 214: 207: 177: 176: 173: 170: 167: 146: 141: 140: 130: 123: 122: 117: 109: 102: 85: 79: 78: 77: 70: 62: 60:Reviewed version 51: 23: 16: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1783: 1782: 1735: 1726: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1705: 1703: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1656:Holy Scriptures 1620: 1523: 1504: 1370: 823: 748:This review is 740: 712: 684: 675: 669: 651: 582: 545: 542: 539: 536: 535: 511: 506: 504: 484: 474: 428: 425: 422: 419: 418: 385: 357: 354: 351: 349:Reference works 348: 347: 314: 312:Reference works 286: 283: 280: 277: 276: 244: 237: 174: 171: 168: 165: 164: 157:the Middle Ages 142: 135: 115: 86:on Knowledge's 83: 58: 12: 11: 5: 1891: 1889: 1881: 1880: 1875: 1870: 1865: 1860: 1855: 1850: 1845: 1840: 1835: 1830: 1825: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1785: 1784: 1781: 1780: 1747: 1746: 1725: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1676: 1619: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1522: 1519: 1503: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1459: 1448: 1440: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1427: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1402: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1380: 1379: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1342: 1341: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1291: 1290: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1200: 1199: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1040:encyclopedias. 977: 976: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 901: 900: 885: 884: 883: 882: 865: 864: 849: 848: 847: 846: 829: 828: 822: 819: 817: 815: 814: 813: 812: 783: 759: 758: 742: 741: 739: 738: 733: 728: 722: 719: 718: 714: 713: 711: 710: 708:External links 705: 700: 694: 691: 690: 683: 680: 677: 676: 671: 667: 665: 662: 661: 653: 652: 647: 641: 634: 633: 630: 629: 626: 625: 622: 621: 616: 606: 605: 600: 590: 589: 587: 585: 579: 578: 570: 569: 562:Mid-importance 558: 552: 551: 549: 517: 516: 500: 488: 487: 485:Mid‑importance 469: 457: 456: 453: 452: 445:Low-importance 441: 435: 434: 432: 429:Latin articles 415:the discussion 401: 389: 388: 386:Low‑importance 380: 368: 367: 364: 363: 361: 334: 322: 321: 309: 297: 296: 293: 292: 290: 250: 249: 233: 221: 220: 215: 203: 202: 199: 198: 191:Mid-importance 187: 181: 180: 178: 161:the discussion 148: 147: 131: 119: 118: 116:Mid‑importance 110: 98: 97: 91: 80: 66: 65: 50: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1890: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1849: 1846: 1844: 1841: 1839: 1836: 1834: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1790: 1788: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1744: 1739: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1730: 1723: 1714: 1701: 1700: 1695: 1688: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1659: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1640: 1639: 1631: 1629: 1625: 1617: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598:Chiswick Chap 1595: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1562:Chiswick Chap 1558: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532:Chiswick Chap 1529: 1520: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1501: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1486:Chiswick Chap 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1475: 1471: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1449: 1446: 1441: 1438: 1433: 1428: 1425: 1424: 1422: 1417: 1412: 1409: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1397: 1392: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1373:Well-written: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1365: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1349:Chiswick Chap 1347:Many thanks. 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1328: 1327: 1320: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1298:Chiswick Chap 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1289: 1286: 1282: 1277: 1276: 1269: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1247:Chiswick Chap 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1207:Chiswick Chap 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1198: 1195: 1191: 1186: 1185: 1146: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1118:Chiswick Chap 1115: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1084:Chiswick Chap 1081: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1055:Chiswick Chap 1052: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1012:Chiswick Chap 1009: 1008: 1007: 1004: 1000: 995: 994: 993: 989: 985: 984:Chiswick Chap 981: 980: 979: 978: 975: 972: 968: 963: 962: 951: 948: 944: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 932: 928: 927:Chiswick Chap 923: 919: 918: 917: 913: 909: 908:Chiswick Chap 905: 904: 903: 902: 899: 896: 892: 887: 886: 881: 877: 873: 872:Chiswick Chap 869: 868: 867: 866: 863: 860: 856: 851: 850: 845: 841: 837: 836:Chiswick Chap 833: 832: 831: 830: 825: 824: 820: 818: 811: 807: 803: 802:Chiswick Chap 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 791: 787: 781: 780: 776: 773: 770: 766: 763: 757: 755: 751: 746: 745: 737: 734: 732: 729: 727: 724: 723: 721: 720: 715: 709: 706: 704: 701: 699: 696: 695: 693: 692: 687: 681: 664: 663: 660: 659: 655: 654: 650: 645: 640: 639: 620: 612: 608: 607: 604: 596: 592: 591: 588: 586: 581: 580: 575: 571: 567: 563: 557: 554: 553: 550: 533: 532: 527: 523: 522: 514: 503: 501: 498: 494: 493: 489: 482: 478: 473: 470: 467: 463: 450: 446: 440: 437: 436: 433: 416: 412: 408: 407: 402: 399: 395: 394: 390: 384: 381: 378: 374: 362: 345: 344: 339: 335: 332: 328: 327: 323: 318: 313: 310: 307: 303: 291: 287:Book articles 274: 270: 269:documentation 266: 262: 258: 257: 256: 247: 241: 236: 234: 231: 227: 226: 222: 219: 216: 213: 209: 196: 192: 186: 183: 182: 179: 162: 158: 154: 153: 145: 139: 134: 132: 129: 125: 124: 120: 114: 111: 108: 104: 99: 95: 89: 81: 72: 71: 61: 56: 55: 48: 44: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1748: 1741: 1740:. CBS News. 1727: 1711: 1704:. Retrieved 1697: 1687: 1679: 1675: 1661: 1647: 1633: 1627: 1621: 1556: 1527: 1524: 1508:87.81.227.94 1505: 1466: 1363: 1219:Much better. 921: 816: 782: 771: 761: 760: 747: 736:Instructions 656: 648: 561: 529: 519: 444: 404: 341: 253: 252: 246:Books portal 190: 150: 94:WikiProjects 52: 43:please do so 31: 30: 26: 1724:Citogenesis 1702:(in French) 1638:Etymologiae 1628:Etymologiae 922:Etymologiae 889:references. 750:transcluded 166:Middle Ages 113:Middle Ages 27:Etymologiae 1787:Categories 1680:References 1502:Tertullian 1368:Assessment 703:Authorship 689:GA toolbox 537:Philosophy 526:philosophy 477:Literature 472:Philosophy 37:under the 1743:decision. 1699:L'Express 1279:citation. 762:Reviewer: 726:Templates 717:Reviewing 682:GA Review 853:history. 821:Comments 775:contribs 731:Criteria 649:Archives 481:Medieval 343:inactive 317:inactive 84:GA-class 47:reassess 1766:wp:LEAD 1652:chevron 1474:snunɐɯ· 1470:·maunus 1336:snunɐɯ· 1332:·maunus 1316:snunɐɯ· 1312:·maunus 1285:snunɐɯ· 1281:·maunus 1265:snunɐɯ· 1261:·maunus 1225:snunɐɯ· 1221:·maunus 1194:snunɐɯ· 1190:·maunus 1142:snunɐɯ· 1138:·maunus 1109:snunɐɯ· 1105:·maunus 1075:snunɐɯ· 1071:·maunus 1046:snunɐɯ· 1042:·maunus 1032:snunɐɯ· 1028:·maunus 1003:snunɐɯ· 999:·maunus 971:snunɐɯ· 967:·maunus 947:snunɐɯ· 943:·maunus 895:snunɐɯ· 891:·maunus 859:snunɐɯ· 855:·maunus 790:snunɐɯ· 786:·maunus 564:on the 447:on the 193:on the 1706:5 June 1584:Risker 1576:Wetman 1540:Risker 1310:Great. 870:Done. 765:Maunus 90:scale. 54:Review 1648:diplé 1330:work! 752:from 420:Latin 411:Latin 383:Latin 278:Books 218:Books 1774:talk 1755:talk 1708:2020 1668:talk 1602:talk 1588:talk 1566:talk 1544:talk 1512:talk 1490:talk 1353:talk 1302:talk 1251:talk 1211:talk 1122:talk 1088:talk 1059:talk 1016:talk 988:talk 931:talk 912:talk 876:talk 840:talk 806:talk 769:talk 263:and 1650:(a 1580:BRD 556:Mid 439:Low 185:Mid 49:it. 1789:: 1776:) 1757:) 1710:. 1696:. 1670:) 1658:". 1642:, 1604:) 1590:) 1568:) 1546:) 1514:) 1492:) 1472:· 1355:) 1334:· 1314:· 1304:) 1283:· 1263:· 1253:) 1223:· 1213:) 1192:· 1140:· 1124:) 1107:· 1090:) 1073:· 1061:) 1044:· 1030:· 1018:) 1001:· 990:) 969:· 945:· 933:) 914:) 893:· 878:) 857:· 842:) 808:) 788:· 777:) 583:/ 479:/ 475:: 63:). 1772:( 1753:( 1666:( 1600:( 1586:( 1564:( 1542:( 1510:( 1488:( 1351:( 1300:( 1249:( 1209:( 1120:( 1103:. 1086:( 1057:( 1014:( 986:( 929:( 910:( 874:( 838:( 804:( 772:· 767:( 658:1 568:. 451:. 346:. 319:) 315:( 275:. 197:. 96::

Index

Good articles
Language and literature good articles
good article criteria
please do so
reassess
Review
Reviewed version
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Middle Ages
WikiProject icon
icon
Middle Ages portal
WikiProject Middle Ages
the Middle Ages
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Books
WikiProject icon
icon
Books portal
WikiProject Books
join the project
discuss matters related to book articles
documentation
relevant guideline for the type of work
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.