283:"The alisphenoid strut, an extension of the alisphenoid bone which separates two foramina (openings) in the skull, the masticatory-buccinator foramen and the foramen ovale accessorius, is rarely present;" when I first read this I though the final "is" should be "are", as I thought three bony parts were being listed, but looking closer I see what the sentence is actually saying. Maybe put (the masticatory-buccinator foramen and the foramen ovale accessories) in parentheses to reduce possible confusion
597:
573:
559:
528:
504:
476:
466:
440:
426:
412:
380:
366:
158:"For a group of 17 specimens from three locations in the state of Pará, Brazil, which had been previously identified as Oryzomys macconnelli (now Euryoryzomys macconnelli) and then as Oryzomys nitidus (now Euryoryzomys nitidus), they introduced the new specific name Oryzomys emmonsae." Sentence needs tweaking: i) was Para previously identified as
277:
Grooves and some foramina, but I don't think it's necessary to say here. That's where data about this character usually come from, though I recall reading about the marsh rice rat that Musser and co were able to confirm that the arteries really followed the grooves in some skulls that were so poorly
141:
DD means that the conservation status is unknown, see the IUCN definition "A taxon is Data
Deficient when there is inadequate information to make a direct, or indirect, assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status."
138:"Its conservation status is unknown" Semantically, I would argue that its conservation status is known (i.e., "data deficient"). More accurate to say that its conservation status is assessed as because yadda yadda...
250:"… O. macconnelli, O. lamia (placed under O. russatus by Musser and colleagues) and O. russatus clustered together" the last two words will probably be confusing to someone who doesn't know phylogenetics/cladistics
274:"It is similar to other members of the genus in the pattern of the arteries of the head." Is the artery pattern reflected as grooves in the skull, or was this determined from dissection of a fleshy specimen?
233:(possibly separate species), but that's a different story which doesn't need to be told here. Therefore, I thought it was best to be a little more approximate to avoid that issue.
66:
62:
47:
39:
344:
338:
266:"The upperparts are tawny brown, a bit darker on the head because many hairs have black tips." missing word (but, and, although?)
551:
103:
please expand the lead a bit, I'm sure you could squeeze two more summary sentences from the description and taxonomy sections
432:
172:
Even
Brazilian states are rice rats. You are right, as usual, and I moved these sentences around a bit to remedy it.
55:
17:
372:
295:. Fundamental number doesn't have a link that I can see, but maybe it's understandable enough from the context.
229:. Introducing those numbers here would make it necessary to explain that there are two different clades within
398:
178:
32:
143:
109:
Excellent. Now please juggle some words a bit so that 5/8 sentences do not begin with "It"Â :)
541:
327:
314:
182:
124:
114:
90:
490:
331:
317:
127:
118:
94:
565:
193:"…including genetic data from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene" genetic data-: -->
418:
194:
323:
214:
about 12%, versus 14.7%: one looks approximate, the other exact... intentional?
110:
86:
145:. Regardless of that, your wording is probably superior anyway, so I used it.
385:
Well written; technical terms are explained sufficiently; complies with MoS.
292:
205:"Their analysis reaffirmed the distinctiveness… " -: -->
74:
43:
123:Down to two now. Thanks for passing the article.
291:(2n = 80; FN = 86) perhaps n could be linked to
8:
550:(images are tagged and non-free images have
481:Uses all the (scant) important literature.
322:The article meets all of the GA criteria:
313:Thanks for the review, helpful as usual.
278:cleaned that they could see the arteries.
7:
545:, where possible and appropriate.
298:Seems a bit of an easter egg link.
217:It differs by 12.1% from southern
24:
595:
571:
557:
526:
502:
499:Fair representation without bias
474:
464:
438:
424:
410:
378:
364:
269:Sounds best with "but", I think.
445:Well-cited to reliable sources.
1:
596:
572:
558:
527:
503:
475:
465:
439:
425:
411:
379:
365:
620:
332:04:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
318:03:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
166:is the specific name, not
128:04:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
119:04:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
95:03:11, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
18:Talk:Euryoryzomys emmonsae
303:"As far as known," -: -->
307:Tightened up a bit more.
354:reasonably well written
564:(appropriate use with
221:, 12.5% from northern
539:It is illustrated by
491:neutral point of view
454:broad in its coverage
286:Used the parentheses.
197:data more accurate?
160:Oryzomys macconnelli
552:fair use rationales
394:factually accurate
258:link/define tribe
253:Expanded a little.
185:is redlink-worthy
566:suitable captions
523:No edit wars etc.
225:, and 12.3% from
168:Oryzomys emmonsae
611:
599:
598:
575:
574:
561:
560:
530:
529:
506:
505:
478:
477:
468:
467:
442:
441:
428:
427:
419:reliable sources
414:
413:
382:
381:
368:
367:
183:Louise H. Emmons
181:, it seems that
79:
70:
51:
619:
618:
614:
613:
612:
610:
609:
608:
488:It follows the
461:(major aspects)
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
617:
615:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:One image, PD.
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
417:(citations to
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
349:
348:
311:
310:
309:
308:
301:
300:
299:
289:
288:
287:
281:
280:
279:
272:
271:
270:
264:
263:
262:
256:
255:
254:
248:
247:
246:
242:an extensive"
236:
235:
234:
231:E. macconnelli
212:
211:
210:
203:
202:
201:
191:
190:
189:
175:
174:
173:
156:
155:
154:
150:link taxonomy
148:
147:
146:
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
616:
601:
600:
593:
590:
589:
587:
584:
577:
576:
569:
567:
555:
553:
547:
546:
544:
543:
538:
532:
531:
524:
521:
520:
518:
514:
508:
507:
500:
497:
496:
494:
492:
487:
480:
479:
472:
462:
458:
457:
455:
451:
444:
443:
436:
434:
422:
420:
408:
404:
403:
401:
400:
395:
391:
384:
383:
376:
374:
362:
358:
357:
355:
351:
350:
347:for criteria)
346:
342:
340:
336:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
320:
319:
316:
306:
305:
302:
297:
296:
294:
290:
285:
284:
282:
276:
275:
273:
268:
267:
265:
260:
259:
257:
252:
251:
249:
244:
243:
241:
237:
232:
228:
224:
223:E. macconelli
220:
219:E. macconelli
216:
215:
213:
208:
207:
206:distinctness
204:
199:
198:
196:
192:
187:
186:
184:
180:
176:
171:
170:
169:
165:
161:
157:
152:
151:
149:
144:
140:
139:
137:
129:
126:
122:
121:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
105:
104:
102:
101:
100:
97:
96:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
591:
585:
563:
549:
540:
522:
516:
498:
489:
470:
460:
453:
430:
416:
407:(references)
406:
397:
393:
370:
360:
353:
337:
321:
312:
304:as is known
239:
230:
226:
222:
218:
167:
163:
159:
98:
83:
82:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
227:E. russatus
44:visual edit
399:verifiable
238:"In 2006,
592:Pass/Fail
471:(focused)
177:based on
99:Comments
84:Reviewer:
27:GA Review
195:sequence
164:emmonsae
586:Overall
361:(prose)
261:Linked.
67:history
48:history
34:Article
542:images
517:stable
515:It is
493:policy
452:It is
392:It is
352:It is
341:review
324:Sasata
315:Ucucha
293:ploidy
162:? ii)
125:Ucucha
111:Sasata
106:Done.
87:Sasata
343:(see
245:Done.
153:Done.
76:Watch
16:<
396:and
345:here
328:talk
209:Yes.
200:Yes.
188:Yes.
179:this
115:talk
91:talk
63:edit
40:edit
373:MoS
594::
588::
562:b
556::
548:a
525::
519:.
501::
495:.
473::
469:b
463::
459:a
456:.
437::
433:OR
423::
415:b
409::
405:a
402:.
377::
369:b
363::
359:a
356:.
339:GA
330:)
240:on
117:)
93:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
570::
568:)
554:)
435:)
431:(
429:c
421:)
375:)
371:(
326:(
113:(
89:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.