916:
notability/educational value between the two subjects is not exponentially substantial enough to warrant a primary topic. An executive branch may have principal relevance/notability/educational value for a specific group of people, especially those into politics and government, but not necessarily to a general audience, who may interact as equally in the realms of business and organizations. For example, I bet you could find articles making the argument that the decisions made by an executive at
Facebook or Google have as much influence on the world's population and behavior as that of the executive branch of the United States. The
31:
293:
186:
165:
85:
64:
95:
196:
22:
592:
going to look through the history, but my guess is that the page used to have a {{unreferenced}} template and somebody tried to help by looking at various sentences and throwing key terms into reference.com thinking "well, it's relevant" or "look at the giant entry this one has! That information can't not be here!"
915:
notability and educational value" over the others (emphasis added). True, an executive branch of a government is notable, but an executive with senior managerial responsibility in a business or another organization also has comparable notability and educational value. IMO, the difference in enduring
358:
The first sentence of both paragraphs don't make sense. Additionally, labelling foreign relations as only "symbolically" important is crazy in the current world. Also, it's no surprise that a
Foreign Relations budget is 0.7% of the total budget. Of course it is as they aren't a "spending" department
395:
Thanks for pointing this out. The article was vandalized at 15:13, October 22, 2007 but only partially reverted resulting in a block of type being removed from the article. I have restored the section back to its prior version. Unfortunately this article has been vandalized and reverted numerous
591:
The citations on this page are terrible and all except for one point to the same site, reference.com. They do not sufficiently verify the information on this page (some of which doesn't even need verification, or appears to be original research that I think can't be verified directly). I'm not
782:
as a simple
Knowledge (XXG) pageview will show you, that is not true. In addition, that article is in horrible condition, I had to try and read it severl times as it really is very badly written (and tagged as such). You'll also notice, it isn't the "Executive branch" which in fact is
920:
comes to my mind, where the (non)actions of a business executive might have influenced who got elected as the current executive of the U.S. The OP would need overwhelming proof without a reasonable doubt to convince me otherwise.
1043:
343:
This article needs to be cleaned up. There are numerous grammatical errors, a few of which I've changed, but I don't have time to do them all. This is a really important article and should be of the highest standard!
1033:
493:
Can someone more qualified than me make a list or flow chart or the
Executive Branches hierarchy structure in the US? For example where do Governors fit into the mix in relation to the President? Mayor? Etc...
1048:
35:
608:
I have removed citations to reference.com that only contained mirrored content from
Knowledge (XXG) (or in a few cases, no content at all), and I call into question the pertinence of the two I left.
565:
I agree with the above statement the entire article suggests that a if the executive also makes laws this is despotic or undemocratic. This view is totally opposed to many democratic systems
635:
I'm familiar with the term
Executive branch, and wondering if the article, and perhaps the title, would benefit from a clearer distinction between the terms executive and executive branch.
764:– I think there is not much explanation needed; the executive branch is by far more important and notable than any article listed on the "Executive" disambiguation page.
735:
917:
1083:
1028:
252:
1038:
319:
1073:
242:
784:
147:
1078:
1068:
829:
using entries from the dab page. Also I think the first step to make in making the article better, is actually making the article better... --
519:
The intro to this article heads straight to define the subject in national rather than global terms. I suggest the perspective be corrected.
218:
627:
The lack of a collective executive, similar to that found in
Switzerland, hurts the article. I don't know how to word it or I would add it.
1058:
462:
137:
705:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1023:
572:
526:
420:
406:
380:
323:
1001:
982:
811:" - Could you clarify that please. But yes your right, the article is indeed terrible and this is the first step in making it better.
598:
To "it's relevant": Just providing a relevant source doesn't prove anything. Example: Feta cheese is the official cheese of Nascar.
1063:
1053:
479:
209:
170:
299:
373:
The local executive is usually supervised by As mentioned above  ??? This sentence seems to be missing a piece marked with .
44:
555:
316:
it might be helpful to have some citations in this section and perhaps mention or link to some scholars work on executives.
673:
This article should explain which are the roles of head of state and head of government in a hybrid system like this. --
475:
957:
696:
108:
69:
540:
I've removed the US boilerplate from the page to help correct this problem but it still has considerable problems
275:
360:
908:
891:
848:
816:
769:
723:
458:
967:
706:
50:
21:
576:
530:
424:
410:
384:
986:
873:
327:
112:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
805:
No, "executive branch" is a synonym for "executive" and this not just within the U.S. Federal government. "
568:
543:
522:
450:
376:
345:
1005:
743:
217:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
943:
887:
844:
812:
765:
719:
678:
454:
605:
To "this one has a big entry": Well, that's usually because IT'S MIRRORED CONTENT FROM WIKIPEDIA.
869:
654:
Does "administration" refer to the executive? If so it should probably be mentioned in the lead.
609:
551:
926:
907:. Pageviews notwithstanding, I am not convinced that any of the subjects are, in the words of
640:
505:
834:
792:
659:
613:
292:
939:
201:
674:
195:
185:
164:
1017:
547:
500:
I guess I haven't looked yet, but maybe these are already pages in
Knowledge (XXG)?
922:
826:
636:
501:
1009:
990:
947:
930:
895:
877:
852:
838:
820:
796:
773:
727:
682:
663:
644:
617:
580:
559:
534:
509:
483:
466:
428:
414:
400:
388:
363:
348:
331:
84:
63:
447:" from the introductory paragraph because it presupposes a presidential system.
830:
788:
655:
599:
94:
966:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
397:
191:
100:
90:
843:
So nowadays
Knowledge (XXG) article views determine a subject's importance?
752:
747:
497:
Perhaps make a flow chart of another government as a secondary example...
214:
1044:
Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
808:
a simple Knowledge (XXG) pageview will show you, that is not true
287:
279:
268:
113:
15:
1034:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Society and social sciences
787:(which I'm assuming you meant going by your edit history). --
308:
Is this still an educational assignment? (sorry very lazy)
1049:
Start-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
785:
Federal government of the United States#Executive branch
757:
956:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
445:
The president controls the armed forces and military.
213:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
709:. No further edits should be made to this section.
970:. No further edits should be made to this section.
595:But there's a problem with both of those ideas.
8:
359:like Education, Health Care, Military etc...
298:This article is currently the subject of an
19:
695:The following is a closed discussion of a
541:
159:
58:
918:Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal
631:Article title/meaning: Executive branch?
489:Executive Hierarchy of the US Government
439:Removed premature reference to president
1084:Knowledge (XXG) articles as assignments
938:. Definitely no primary topic here. --
161:
60:
1029:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles
807:
405:where are the items of the executive
7:
714:The result of the move request was:
443:I removed the incongruous sentence "
227:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics
207:This article is within the scope of
106:This article is within the scope of
116:and the subjects encompassed by it.
49:It is of interest to the following
1039:Start-Class level-4 vital articles
14:
354:Foreign Relations section is poor
1074:Top-importance politics articles
291:
194:
184:
163:
93:
83:
62:
29:
20:
688:Requested move 9 September 2018
602:, www.dictionary.reference.com
247:This article has been rated as
142:This article has been rated as
122:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
948:13:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
931:04:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
913:substantially greater enduring
896:12:00, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
853:12:00, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
728:14:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
510:12:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
467:18:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
1079:WikiProject Politics articles
1069:Start-Class politics articles
1010:01:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
878:22:33, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
839:17:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
821:17:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
797:16:40, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
774:14:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
581:23:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
474:…Thank You: very nice article
230:Template:WikiProject Politics
221:and see a list of open tasks.
645:06:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
535:06:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
401:03:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
389:01:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
1059:Top-importance law articles
664:09:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
278:of this article appears in
1100:
1024:Start-Class vital articles
991:15:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
981:Is the way executive plan
758:Executive (disambiguation)
253:project's importance scale
148:project's importance scale
1000:Definition of government
683:23:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
669:Semi-presidential systems
364:19:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
349:21:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
246:
179:
141:
78:
57:
1064:WikiProject Law articles
1054:Start-Class law articles
963:Please do not modify it.
886:Aha, very comprehensive
702:Please do not modify it.
618:20:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
484:20:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
429:16:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
415:16:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
332:00:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
125:Template:WikiProject Law
560:22:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
744:Executive (government)
361:Oplossing is duidelijk
300:educational assignment
476:David George DeLancey
322:comment was added by
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
36:level-4 vital article
623:Collective Executive
515:American perspective
210:WikiProject Politics
977:Executive structure
419:I need answers now
369:Missing Information
827:pageviews analysis
45:content assessment
739:
736:non-admin closure
571:comment added by
562:
546:comment added by
525:comment added by
469:
453:comment added by
391:
379:comment added by
335:
312:citations needed?
306:
305:
286:
285:
267:
266:
263:
262:
259:
258:
233:politics articles
158:
157:
154:
153:
1091:
965:
760:
733:
704:
650:"administration"
583:
537:
448:
374:
346:Boliviainfoforum
317:
295:
288:
269:
235:
234:
231:
228:
225:
204:
199:
198:
188:
181:
180:
175:
167:
160:
130:
129:
126:
123:
120:
103:
98:
97:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1014:
1013:
998:
979:
974:
961:
909:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
756:
700:
690:
671:
652:
633:
625:
589:
566:
520:
517:
491:
441:
371:
356:
341:
318:—The preceding
314:
232:
229:
226:
223:
222:
202:Politics portal
200:
193:
173:
127:
124:
121:
118:
117:
109:WikiProject Law
99:
92:
72:
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
1097:
1095:
1087:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1016:
1015:
997:
994:
978:
975:
973:
972:
958:requested move
952:
951:
950:
933:
901:
900:
899:
898:
888:Colonestarrice
881:
880:
868:totally wrong
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
845:Colonestarrice
813:Colonestarrice
800:
799:
766:Colonestarrice
762:
761:
750:
731:
720:Colonestarrice
712:
711:
697:requested move
691:
689:
686:
670:
667:
651:
648:
632:
629:
624:
621:
588:
587:Poor citations
585:
516:
513:
490:
487:
455:EmmetCaulfield
440:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
370:
367:
355:
352:
340:
337:
313:
310:
304:
303:
296:
284:
283:
272:
265:
264:
261:
260:
257:
256:
249:Top-importance
245:
239:
238:
236:
219:the discussion
206:
205:
189:
177:
176:
174:Top‑importance
168:
156:
155:
152:
151:
144:Top-importance
140:
134:
133:
131:
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
73:Top‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1096:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1019:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1003:
995:
993:
992:
988:
984:
976:
971:
969:
964:
959:
954:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
934:
932:
928:
924:
919:
914:
910:
906:
903:
902:
897:
893:
889:
885:
884:
883:
882:
879:
875:
871:
870:In ictu oculi
867:
864:
863:
854:
850:
846:
842:
841:
840:
836:
832:
828:
824:
823:
822:
818:
814:
810:
809:
804:
803:
802:
801:
798:
794:
790:
786:
781:
778:
777:
776:
775:
771:
767:
759:
754:
751:
749:
745:
742:
741:
740:
737:
730:
729:
725:
721:
717:
710:
708:
703:
698:
693:
692:
687:
685:
684:
680:
676:
668:
666:
665:
661:
657:
649:
647:
646:
642:
638:
630:
628:
622:
620:
619:
615:
611:
606:
603:
601:
596:
593:
586:
584:
582:
578:
574:
573:91.106.175.40
570:
563:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
538:
536:
532:
528:
527:99.250.19.186
524:
514:
512:
511:
507:
503:
498:
495:
488:
486:
485:
481:
477:
472:
471:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
446:
438:
430:
426:
422:
421:41.242.66.236
418:
417:
416:
412:
408:
407:41.242.66.236
404:
403:
402:
399:
396:times since.
394:
393:
392:
390:
386:
382:
381:68.255.79.238
378:
368:
366:
365:
362:
353:
351:
350:
347:
338:
336:
333:
329:
325:
324:163.1.151.252
321:
311:
309:
301:
297:
294:
290:
289:
281:
277:
273:
271:
270:
254:
250:
244:
241:
240:
237:
220:
216:
212:
211:
203:
197:
192:
190:
187:
183:
182:
178:
172:
169:
166:
162:
149:
145:
139:
136:
135:
132:
115:
111:
110:
102:
96:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1002:102.89.23.49
999:
983:102.89.45.47
980:
962:
955:
935:
912:
904:
865:
806:
779:
763:
732:
715:
713:
701:
694:
672:
653:
634:
626:
607:
604:
597:
594:
590:
564:
542:— Preceding
539:
518:
499:
496:
492:
473:
470:
444:
442:
372:
357:
342:
315:
307:
248:
208:
143:
128:law articles
107:
51:WikiProjects
34:
968:move review
707:move review
600:Feta Cheese
567:—Preceding
521:—Preceding
449:—Preceding
375:—Preceding
114:legal field
41:Start-class
1018:Categories
996:Government
940:Necrothesp
101:Law portal
753:Executive
748:Executive
716:withdrawn
675:B.Lameira
39:is rated
569:unsigned
556:contribs
548:Otonabee
544:unsigned
523:unsigned
463:contribs
451:unsigned
377:unsigned
339:Clean up
320:unsigned
224:Politics
215:politics
171:Politics
923:Zzyzx11
911:, "has
637:Shanata
502:Rmkreeg
276:summary
251:on the
146:on the
936:Oppose
905:Oppose
866:Oppose
831:Gonnym
789:Gonnym
780:Oppose
656:Rob984
610:Exp HP
47:scale.
825:This
398:Dbiel
28:This
1006:talk
987:talk
944:talk
927:talk
892:talk
874:talk
849:talk
835:talk
817:talk
793:talk
770:talk
724:talk
679:talk
660:talk
641:talk
614:talk
577:talk
552:talk
531:talk
506:talk
480:talk
459:talk
425:talk
411:talk
385:talk
328:talk
960:.
280:Law
243:Top
138:Top
119:Law
70:Law
1020::
1008:)
989:)
946:)
929:)
894:)
876:)
851:)
837:)
819:)
795:)
772:)
755:→
746:→
726:)
718:-
699:.
681:)
662:)
643:)
616:)
579:)
558:)
554:•
533:)
508:)
482:)
465:)
461:•
427:)
413:)
387:)
330:)
274:A
1004:(
985:(
942:(
925:(
890:(
872:(
847:(
833:(
815:(
791:(
768:(
738:)
734:(
722:(
677:(
658:(
639:(
612:(
575:(
550:(
529:(
504:(
478:(
457:(
423:(
409:(
383:(
334:.
326:(
302:.
282:.
255:.
150:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
