280:
147:
77:
53:
344:
202:
175:
87:
22:
212:
476:
Has any notable coverage of a special screening been released by a newspaper or a magazine? Plus, Special screening is arranged only for those who are actively participating in a film career, rather than a media person who plainly promotes a film industry. This issue is alarming, I suggest a voting
496:
I agree with U, there may be a so called special screenings, but his reviews are the most unreliable ones ever, check MBKD, or
Bodyguard, the films has been panned by critics yet he gives them a 4/5 and 4.5/5 respectively, his BO judgment is also HIGHLY unreliable as well, he called Ready (2001) a
459:
special screening is arranged for Media people a day before release. However i don't believe in ratings by Taran Adarsh as he is always the one who gives max. stars to promote stars, as in Mumbai we people go to watch a movie depending upon its ratings.
636:
289:
185:
156:
63:
626:
631:
294:
641:
606:
601:
621:
270:
260:
646:
611:
433:
The movie has not yet released. But on the contrary, Taran Adarsh has released a so-called "review" in his website. Check it out!
415:
616:
105:
596:
117:
109:
33:
523:
489:
443:
411:
325:
235:
225:
180:
497:
ATBB when it's only a
Blockbuster AND he called Mausam a flop when it's a hit. I'd say we vote on his reliability! --
113:
100:
58:
352:
516:
482:
436:
397:
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
361:
321:
39:
383:
before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
279:
553:
535:
465:
21:
571:
502:
434:
563:
545:
477:
session on whether Taran Adarsh's ratings should be used in WP, which apparently is NOT an
549:
531:
461:
146:
478:
388:
590:
567:
512:
498:
401:
392:
380:
317:
217:
104:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
92:
349:
The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:
343:
207:
82:
76:
52:
456:
452:
575:
557:
539:
525:
506:
491:
469:
445:
419:
329:
201:
174:
566:
are reliable. Just the BO reports and critical reviews are the problem. --
320:
credited for the story in the film?? Won't it attract any controversies??
121:
379:; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review
233:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
355:, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason:
230:
364:
has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason:
15:
278:
145:
400:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
335:
File:FORCE Poster 2.jpg
Nominated for speedy Deletion
548:are reliable. Only the reviews need not be added.
366:All Knowledge files with unknown copyright status
357:All Knowledge files with unknown copyright status
637:C-Class Indian cinema articles of Low-importance
229:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
120:. To improve this article, please refer to the
8:
169:
116:. To use this banner, please refer to the
47:
451:Movie is set to release tomorrow, unlike
627:C-Class India articles of Low-importance
515:and ask a few more ppl to participate.
171:
49:
19:
408:This notification is provided by a Bot
632:Low-importance Indian cinema articles
511:Well, then I shall raise an issue at
7:
223:This article is within the scope of
98:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
642:WikiProject Indian cinema articles
562:Ofcourse, all news and picture on
14:
607:Indian cinema task force articles
154:This article is supported by the
342:
210:
200:
173:
114:regional and topical task forces
85:
75:
51:
20:
391:then you may need to provide a
265:This article has been rated as
602:C-Class Indian cinema articles
544:However, the news contents in
540:05:28, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
530:Go forward Secret of Success.
526:17:33, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
507:17:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
492:16:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
470:15:47, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
446:15:21, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
420:21:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
330:09:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
622:Low-importance India articles
287:This article is supported by
576:10:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
558:06:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
290:the Indian cinema workgroup
245:Knowledge:WikiProject India
663:
647:WikiProject India articles
271:project's importance scale
248:Template:WikiProject India
130:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
612:WikiProject Film articles
286:
264:
195:
153:
133:Template:WikiProject Film
70:
46:
157:Indian cinema task force
353:File:FORCE Poster 2.jpg
617:C-Class India articles
412:CommonsNotificationBot
283:
150:
28:This article is rated
597:C-Class film articles
282:
149:
362:File:Force Music.jpg
381:deletion guidelines
106:join the discussion
479:advertising medium
393:fair use rationale
284:
151:
34:content assessment
564:Bollywood Hungama
546:Bollywood Hungama
519:Secret of success
485:Secret of success
439:Secret of success
426:
425:
372:What should I do?
322:Secret of success
309:
308:
305:
304:
301:
300:
226:WikiProject India
168:
167:
164:
163:
108:and see lists of
654:
520:
486:
440:
387:If the image is
346:
339:
338:
312:Gautham Menon???
253:
252:
249:
246:
243:
220:
215:
214:
213:
204:
197:
196:
191:
188:
177:
170:
138:
137:
134:
131:
128:
101:WikiProject Film
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
662:
661:
657:
656:
655:
653:
652:
651:
587:
586:
518:
484:
438:
431:
402:Deletion Review
337:
314:
250:
247:
244:
241:
240:
216:
211:
209:
189:
183:
135:
132:
129:
126:
125:
91:
86:
84:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
660:
658:
650:
649:
644:
639:
634:
629:
624:
619:
614:
609:
604:
599:
589:
588:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
560:
542:
473:
472:
430:
427:
424:
423:
405:
404:
398:
395:
374:
373:
369:
368:
359:
347:
336:
333:
313:
310:
307:
306:
303:
302:
299:
298:
295:Low-importance
285:
275:
274:
267:Low-importance
263:
257:
256:
254:
251:India articles
222:
221:
205:
193:
192:
190:Low‑importance
178:
166:
165:
162:
161:
152:
142:
141:
139:
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
659:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
610:
608:
605:
603:
600:
598:
595:
594:
592:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
559:
555:
551:
550:Karthik Nadar
547:
543:
541:
537:
533:
532:Karthik Nadar
529:
528:
527:
524:
522:
521:
514:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
495:
494:
493:
490:
488:
487:
480:
475:
474:
471:
467:
463:
462:Karthik Nadar
458:
454:
450:
449:
448:
447:
444:
442:
441:
435:
428:
422:
421:
417:
413:
409:
403:
399:
396:
394:
390:
386:
385:
384:
382:
378:
371:
370:
367:
363:
360:
358:
354:
351:
350:
348:
345:
341:
340:
334:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
318:Gautham Menon
311:
296:
293:(assessed as
292:
291:
281:
277:
276:
272:
268:
262:
259:
258:
255:
238:
237:
232:
228:
227:
219:
208:
206:
203:
199:
198:
194:
187:
182:
179:
176:
172:
159:
158:
148:
144:
143:
140:
136:film articles
123:
119:
118:documentation
115:
111:
107:
103:
102:
94:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
517:
483:
437:
432:
407:
406:
376:
375:
365:
356:
315:
288:
266:
236:project page
234:
224:
218:India portal
155:
99:
40:WikiProjects
377:Don't panic
93:Film portal
591:Categories
122:guidelines
110:open tasks
457:Bollywood
453:Kollywood
568:Meryam90
499:Meryam90
389:non-free
316:Y isn't
269:on the
30:C-class
513:Wp:RSN
186:Cinema
64:Indian
36:scale.
455:, in
242:India
231:India
181:India
572:talk
554:talk
536:talk
503:talk
466:talk
429:HUH?
416:talk
326:Talk
127:Film
112:and
59:Film
261:Low
593::
574:)
556:)
538:)
505:)
481:.
468:)
418:)
410:--
328:)
297:).
184::
62::
570:(
552:(
534:(
501:(
464:(
414:(
324:(
273:.
239:.
160:.
124:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
