257:
236:
21:
346:
325:
356:
61:
1234:
1439:
1404:
1390:
1356:
1329:
1279:
1154:
1141:
1127:
1063:
1049:
1001:
982:
205:
147:
1668:
1660:
1683:
1636:
1612:
1581:
1562:
1547:
1519:
1476:
1411:
1286:
1269:
1243:
1218:
1204:
1181:
1161:
1087:
1070:
2076:. As nowadays this subject is fortunately being taken more seriously by politicians and others than it was in 2018, would you or anyone else have time to update this article? If not I am not sure it is still GA. One reason I am asking is that I am looking for some ideas before creating "Forest in Turkey". Perhaps I should model it on
2431:
Thanks for the ping! I'm coming at this from a botanical rather than commercial forestry angle. The tree list is of uncertain value as it stands at the moment, as a lot of the trees on it (including many of the native species) are not of commercial forestry significance, being little more than shrubs
2442:
as it makes maintenance easier (the option of sorting to sci name is how found a duplicate in the list just now). The 'Period' is also of limited value, but if wanted, much more precise introduction dates are known for most introduced species; I can add them if need be. I'd also suggest changing the
2006:
History of
Forestry in the UK I don't see an issue with its absence. Possibly the section could be retitled 'Background'. The lead makes it clear that the article is only intended to deal with the current (and recent) situation. In terms of GA status I am more concerned by the lack of referencing in
714:
I've added a long footnote. The distinction between "tree" and "shrub" is not clear cut and I don't have the main texts so I didn't want to add to the main list - at least at this point. Also, there may be all kinds of Welsh shrubs lurking in valleys I know nothing about. For my money, Elder and the
1237:
For books with more than one edition, it could be clearer which edition is being referenced (it's always the latest one, as far as I can tell). It may be clearer not to mention the date of publication of the first edition, since then looking for e.g. James 1966 one sees James 1955 (and further down
1814:
These are not specialist terms, and the topic of the article is not a specialist term. If they were specialist terms, then fine, if 'Forestry in United
Kingdom' didn't just talk about forestry in the United Kingdom, if it was the name of a book or something, or if it was a technical concept that
808:
Hi there, I've been doing some work on this and I'm not sure I completely agree :) They were legal constructs, yes, but the Royal
Forests included very large amounts of the wooded areas that survived and think of as major forests today (Dean, Sherwood, Epping). They also contained and protected
1721:
OK, I think that's enough to mark it as a pass. I still think the list in the article is rather a long intermission, and would suggest you consider moving it to another article. Looking around, though, I see that there seem to be competing lists with this (as rather unencylopaedicly stated at
2392:
I seem to have unwatched this article by accident. I certainly didn't mean to. I was therefore unaware of the maintenance tags and talk page commentary, and I haven't satisfied the tagger's demands. I would however note that if changes are needed and sources exist, then the edit button is
1810:
It is simply incorrect to emphasise the terms like that. This is not the article for people that don't know what 'forestry' is, nor where the 'united kingdom' is; if they need to know that, they need to go to the relevant articles, and in those articles the titles are emphasised.
1229:" and "Nix et. al" i.e. the abbreviation stops were wrong and the italics differed. I've changed them all to "et al." ("et" is not an abbreviation so doesn't need a stop). It might be better in italics as a foreign word, but I am not too concerned providing it's consistent.
2007:
Planting and
Stewardship and management. I assume that this could be easily remedied? Otherwise I find some of the language a bit clunky and don't personally like the big list in the middle, but see no reason other than the missing cites why it would need reassessing.
892:
Please do muck in and edit the article, there's a long way to go before it's fit to be featured content! :-) If for any reason you're hesitant you're obviously welcome to propose specific changes here. Quite possibly I'm the only person who has this page watchlisted,
1522:
Throughout the article, care should be taken with the terms
British Isles, Britain and UK. (I've changed UK to Britain in one place.) While I think the author of the article is being careful to distinguish, our readers might not. For that reason I have also linked
809:
woodland economies that are important for our understanding of
British forestry; the process of disafforestation led to riots as enclose removed the economy and led to assart of the wooded areas. When the legal protections went, so did the forested areas (such as
1414:
However, I feel that there could be a couple more images towards the end of the article, e.g. a map showing the amount of afforestation in different parts of the UK/Britain/British Isles, or perhaps just illustrative examples of threats/diseases (e.g. Dutch Elm
749:
be included in this article - I know they were different to modern forests but could be something readers might expect to find a reference to. Also State forest parks are mentioned in the article, however it is not clear what these were. Do they relate to
775:
State forest parks were an inter-war initiative that's no longer active, and I haven't elaborated on them because I don't have any sourced content that's specifically about them to offer. If anyone knows of a source, I'd welcome the chance to expand the
2417:. But I donât think there is any rush. Maybe people who are out walking in the woods now will take this up once winter storms force them inside. I have notified some other editors but if you know any more who might be interested please let them know.
2161:
as far fewer people are likely to be interested or able to write that than a UK article. In that I include forestry as a subset of forests. I would welcome your edits and comments there as I hope to nominate it for good article some time this year.
959:
I'll thus expand this review over time. I imagine it will take a few days to review it fully. I'll make what I consider minor, uncontroversial copy edits, but feel free to revert them. Other suggestions for copy edits I'll list here.
771:
A Royal Forest isn't necessarily or even usually a forest; most aren't covered with trees. Royal forest is a legal term, and doesn't have anything to do with forestry. The sources I used to create the article don't mention royal
2535:. It's a relatively new feature which we used extensively in articles about the COVID-19 pandemic, so we could update the case numbers once and propagate that information to lots of articles. I would suggest that we convert
1798:
term in the context of the article. In other words, the purpose of the article is to define something (as well as write things about and related to it), and the emphasis is being used to tell the reader what you're defining.
434:
My edit this morning was done in haste and I have run out of time again now - but this isn't correct either. Scots Pine forest would only cover about 20-30% of the area, tops. I will respond at greater length asap. Regards,
2355:
3.a) As a lot has changed since 2010 I think the article no longer properly addresses the main aspects of the topic. In particular the topic has become far more political. I mentioned this again on the talk page last month
1916:, with no mention of how forested the UK was in pre-history, no mention of the importance of forestry in the Middle Ages â as somewhere outlaws could hide and where serfs could forage (or poach) for food â no mention of
2277:
42:
2543:
merge the lists, and then use the LST feature to selectively transclude the commercial forestry species. That way we only have to maintain one list but we can display a complete set of information everywhere we need
813:, which I've been documenting). Finally, the royal forest remnants became the beginning of state managed forestry today. So I think the royal forests had an important role in UK forestry history.Hope this helps
1663:"Thirty-one species" is spelled out here whereas "32 species" is not in the lead. I can be easily swayed whether this is a problem or not since I can see reasons for spelling out in one place but not the other.
2626:
2128:
because I think that's a notable subject in its own right. I think its scope would be different, without all the content about the industry and economics of timber and timber products, and with a section on
456:
Done. However, reconciling the list here and Smout's is not easy. Some - Beech, the Limes, Hornbeam probably were not native to
Scotland. But Smout lists no fewer than nine willows not on this list plus the
1565:"For reasons already described", what reasons? I think this refers to "The country's supply of timber was severely depleted in the ... Wars" (in the lead) but that's not a reason, it's a fact.
2203:
The article has little on the purposes of forestry in the UK. And whether they conflict - for example whether timber production, CO2 absorption and recreation need different kinds of trees.
994:
large list in the middle of the article, which I think really deserves a separate article (or merge into one of the several already in existence). But that can be addressed after the revew.
1418:
An image of White Rot Fungus has been added, however I would love a map showing the density of afforestation e.g. per-county. Alternatively perhaps a good satellite photo could show this.
2319:
1550:
I've knocked down the precision of 2,300,000 hectares to km. If undesired, write "2.3 million hectares (5.7 million acres)" since all these zeros imply a precision that is not there.
1531:
at first use. In particular, in the lead, a greater distinction from the first mention of the
British Isles (presumably geographical) to Britain (presumably political) is too subtle.
72:
2315:
1892:: "However, if the article title is merely descriptiveâsuch as Electrical characteristics of dynamic loudspeakersâthe title does not need to appear verbatim in the main text."
1753:
The prediction in the introduction about what the foliage would be in the absence of people seems speculative. Perhaps the author means to say "prior to human habitation".
2621:
2300:
1949:
I'm not sure I'd rate this article higher than C-Class, personally. There's some areas it covers really well, but the historical detail is sparse, when present at all. â
412:
307:
2483:
Certainly worth considering, though that list does not include several commercially important forestry species that happen not to be widely naturalised in
Britain -
2646:
2292:
668:
Bay willow, Beech, Black poplar, Box, Crab apple, Crack willow, Field maple, Hornbeam, Lime, Midland thorn, Small lime, White willow, Whitebeam, Wild service, Yew.
402:
2432:
and/or very rare (e.g. the native whitebeams, many of the willows), or only of horticultural interest; but there are also a few species used in forestry that are
2109:
I wonder whether renaming this article would be useful by increasing its scope. For example then more info could be added on the recreational use of forests.
2651:
2444:
378:
168:
2611:
1671:
I'm a bit concerned that this list takes up almost half the article space (excluding references etc). It might be better to put it into a separate article.
2536:
2466:
985:
I've now completed the review and placing it on hold to be addressed. It didn't take me as long as I expected because half the article is in fact a list.
2137:, for example. I would tend to resist changing this article's scope but I'd very much encourage you to start a separate one on the forests themselves.â
1802:
In this case, with any descriptive title, those terms are general terms and concepts already defined elsewhere better than this article can or should.
1164:
Some of the Web references could have been fuller â I've checked them and augmented them. Some people prefer Web references in a separate group â see
2641:
2636:
297:
2469:
perhaps we should just delete the list in this article to avoid duplication? If this article needs a list it could maybe excerpt the list article?
2340:
2046:
A user requested that this article was reviewed to see if a full GAR was needed, I don't think it is, there were two statements which constituted
948:
130:
1246:
Hibberd was wrong in saying 1993 (revised 1991), unless he has a time machine, so I've just put 1993 (11th ed). which is what the ISBN refers to.
369:
330:
2184:
Are there no stats for UK for those things? And would NI have been like
Scotland or England - I mean would it have been mostly oaks beforehand?
273:
90:
1815:
referred to some scheme for woodworking joints or something, but it's not, and we simply need to link to where they're much better defined..
1027:
1021:
2631:
751:
2616:
1382:
2021:
I've just deleted it (the planting and stewardship) comment, I don't think it is worth a full GAR, it could be re-added with a cite.
78:
2134:
1946:'s plantation of non-native pine across swathes of Wales and their more-recent change to plant broad-leaved deciduous, for example.
1585:
1146:
264:
241:
2555:
2508:
2404:
2148:
1857:
1706:
1093:
Done for threats; OKish about the para as a whole â it is fine to have something like it in the lead but perhaps is too detailed.
906:
871:
795:
730:
701:
679:
494:
472:
446:
956:
I come to this as an intelligent but ignorant reader, and it is my habit to comment on the article as I read it the first time.
2371:
1646:
These have been added. Though the reference is to a blog in name, I don't think it's what most people would describe as a blog.
216:
2374:
2285:
182:
2517:
To make the list easier to maintain if new species entered the UK, for example those better able to tolerate climate change
256:
235:
2125:
1639:
Need references for definition of ancient semi-natural woodland, and for broadleaf forests containing indigenous species.
1055:
2365:
1791:
The first few sections in the lead section is awful, and violates WP:LEAD, and there's good reason why it's terrible.
2585:
1794:
Not all articles have emphasis in the lead sentences. The emphasis in lead sections is used when you're defining a
1593:
461:
and Elder. Its probably not necessary to go into the details here but I'll provide the list if you are interested.
1113:
2443:
lead photo from Epping Forest (basically, a public park, not a commercial forestry site); perhaps something like
2238:
For example politics. Can anyone add more or if not I will do a âgood article reviewâ and explain in more detail
1758:
944:
2257:
Donât seem to be pointing right - personally I donât like Harv refs - more trouble than they are worth I think
1444:
Tempted to fail because of the lead and the fact it doesn't say much about forestry, but I'll hold it for now.
755:
690:
I agree that Smouts is a reliable source, so I would have no objection to the list being amended accordingly.â
222:
1829:
This isn't vietnam, we're not fucking up the lead of the article to avoid fucking up the lead of the article.
1589:
1090:
I also feel the last paragraph is perhaps too detailed for the lead. Nothing in the lead mentions threats.
2012:
1777:
612:
2360:
but there is still very little about politics in the article. There are plenty of sources - for example
1958:
1925:
1897:
1877:
1834:
1820:
835:, thought of them mainly in plegal terms and failed to examine the process of decline of woodland areas
377:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
361:
272:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
161:
60:
20:
1074:
1184:::The section "Ancient semi-natural woodland" could do with a couple more references (detailed below).
2551:
2504:
2400:
2144:
2050:
and one which would need a citation. I've deleted them and will remove the GAR request template too.
1853:
1754:
1702:
902:
884:
867:
842:
817:
791:
725:
698:
674:
643:
603:
491:
467:
441:
1841:
82:
1943:
1731:
1449:
1233:
1009:
970:
146:
1372:
837:
How many forests survived into and through early modern times?, St John's College Research Centre
779:
You're right to say that the National Forest deserves a mention, and I'll add something about it.
651:
639:
540:
515:
187:
1438:
1403:
1389:
1361:
Mostly the work of one author, with occasional contributions from others. Not much on talk page.
1355:
1328:
1278:
1153:
1140:
1126:
1062:
1048:
1000:
981:
831:
I found this interesting discussion which talks about why historians have neglected the fate of
483:
Hmm, I'd be interested to know what Smout lists; this is a volume to which I don't have access.â
37:
2377:), and there are some cleanup tags and reference errors which have been there for a while now.
2593:
2522:
2474:
2422:
2414:
2382:
2358:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Forestry_in_the_United_Kingdom#Important_info_is_missing_I_think
2262:
2243:
2223:
2208:
2189:
2167:
2133:
instead.When I started this article I meant it to be about the industry -- as a parallel with
2114:
2103:
2085:
2077:
2008:
1990:
1928:
and its part in the constitutional crises of the Plantagenet period, about royal forests, the
1773:
1171:
607:
1889:
1480:
1315:
2597:
2559:
2526:
2512:
2492:
2478:
2456:
2426:
2408:
2386:
2372:
https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/information-and-services/forests/public-forests-northern-ireland
2357:
2266:
2247:
2227:
2212:
2193:
2171:
2158:
2152:
2118:
2089:
2059:
2030:
2016:
1993:
1968:
1952:
1901:
1893:
1881:
1873:
1861:
1830:
1824:
1816:
1781:
1762:
1735:
1723:
1710:
1453:
1165:
1013:
974:
910:
887:
875:
845:
820:
810:
799:
762:
735:
708:
684:
655:
647:
552:
544:
523:
501:
477:
451:
345:
324:
2532:
1396:
880:
Thank you, I'm happy to suggest something subject to any input or caveats from anyone else
33:
2545:
2498:
2394:
2375:
https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/forestry-in-northern-ireland-facing-uncertain-future/
2138:
2055:
2026:
1976:
1921:
1845:
1694:
894:
881:
859:
839:
814:
783:
720:
691:
669:
599:
589:
548:
519:
511:
484:
462:
458:
436:
2047:
1615:
In the last sentence we're back to the British Isles, after being in Britain in the lead.
1133:
29:
1667:
1659:
1727:
1445:
1005:
966:
754:? Do State forest parks still exist? & do they have any legal standing? Should the
635:
585:
577:
527:
374:
2605:
2488:
2452:
2364:
and it has been a couple of months now since the new government appointed a minister
1962:
1942:. Equally, the coverage of modern afforestation is pretty sparse â no mention of the
1939:
832:
623:
2447:
which shows more what 'real' forestry is like, and with forestry work in progress -
2370:
Also the article does not have enough content on Northern Ireland (possible sources
665:
In this list, not on Smouts: (probably all native to England but not further north)
2589:
2518:
2470:
2418:
2378:
2366:
https://www.charteredforesters.org/uk-government-appoints-new-minister-for-forestry
2361:
2258:
2239:
2219:
2204:
2185:
2163:
2130:
2110:
2081:
1982:
1682:
1635:
1611:
1580:
1561:
1546:
1518:
1475:
1410:
1285:
1268:
1242:
1217:
1203:
1180:
1160:
1086:
1069:
746:
631:
627:
560:
556:
535:
531:
1299:
in the United Kingdom. Not much is mentioned about the timber industry and so on.
858:
Yes, that's interesting. Will you update the article based on what's said there?â
268:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of
1726:, which I was tempted to suggest sarcastically this article should be moved to).
836:
2102:
I see some country article names start with âForestâ or âForestsâ - for example
581:
573:
2071:
2051:
2022:
1917:
351:
1935:
759:
155:
1098:
On the whole, though, it is written in clear, concise and correct language.
990:
Review now completed, and most issues addressed, with the exception of the
951:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
2484:
2462:
2448:
1868:
Yes, and I quote: "When a descriptive title is self-explanatory, such as
1528:
1291:
269:
178:
1213:
templates and so on, so that the citations can link to the bibliography.
1524:
1510:
This has been removed; it could have just been moved to the "see also".
1872:, a definition may not be needed. See also fallacies of definition.".
1914:
The stock of woodland declined alarmingly during the First World War
662:
Plus a note to the effect that the Yew "may be native in the west".
2588:
includes the north - not really sure how best to link it from here
2436:
included and should be added. I'd recommend changing the order to
1981:
Have you seen this? Would you be able to address these concerns.
2218:
have started a section - would be great if you could improve it
1929:
198:
15:
1302:
Section "Timber industry" added, although it's not very long.
2627:
Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles that are good articles
1912:
The first mention of a historical period in the article is
1686:
I've added a few links, but otherwise I think this is fine.
1073:
Lead: The lead section fails to mention the subject. See
507:
34 in the list all told, which is of "trees and shrubs":
1004:
Pass, congratulations and thank you for your hard work.
373:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
2393:
available... Otherwise I'll get to this in due course.â
2335:
2327:
2296:
154:
A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
123:
1772:
What about new woodlands and forests being planted?
1622:
I think the footnote in the lead now clarifies this.
2157:Thanks for interesting reply but I am focused on
1479:As mentioned above, the lead does not conform to
2413:Not going to edit this myself as I am busy with
2362:https://www.forestryjournal.co.uk/news/politics/
551:, Juniper, Q. robur, Q. petraea, P. sylvestris,
88:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
2180:Why so much Britain in lead and so little UK?
1586:England Rural Development Programme 2000-2006
8:
2445:File:Timber harvesting in Kielder Forest.JPG
1381:(images are tagged and non-free images have
36:to determine whether the article meets the
2537:List of trees of Great Britain and Ireland
2467:List of trees of Great Britain and Ireland
2124:We could certainly have an article called
924:
387:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United Kingdom
319:
230:
102:
55:
2622:Agriculture, food and drink good articles
1193:Refs added to Forestry Commission report.
73:Agriculture, food and drink good articles
949:Talk:Forestry in the United Kingdom/GA1
321:
232:
177:Did you know ... that growth rates for
2647:Mid-importance United Kingdom articles
2539:into one or more sortable wikitables,
1913:
1458:Most of these have now been addressed.
1295:in the United Kingdom. It talks about
741:Royal Forests & State forest parks
719:) should be included as natives tho'.
715:three main Arran Whitebeams (i.e. not
566:Those that don't appear in this list:
1749:Prediction "in the absence of people"
570:Possibly treated as shrubs not trees:
7:
367:This article is within the scope of
282:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Forestry
262:This article is within the scope of
204:
202:
2652:WikiProject United Kingdom articles
2439:! Scientific name !! Common name !!
1168:for an example. I've put them into
752:National parks of England and Wales
390:Template:WikiProject United Kingdom
221:It is of interest to the following
2612:Good article reassessment nominees
1376:, where possible and appropriate.
14:
2234:Important info is missing I think
2135:Agriculture in the United Kingdom
1806:Here we're not defining anything.
1207:I've put all the references into
81:. If you can improve it further,
2642:GA-Class United Kingdom articles
2637:Mid-importance Forestry articles
2497:Why would we avoid duplication?â
2002:Given that the article title is
1681:
1666:
1658:
1634:
1610:
1579:
1560:
1545:
1517:
1474:
1437:
1409:
1402:
1388:
1354:
1327:
1324:Fair representation without bias
1284:
1277:
1267:
1241:
1232:
1216:
1202:
1179:
1159:
1152:
1139:
1125:
1085:
1068:
1061:
1047:
999:
980:
510:Those that appear in this list:
354:
344:
323:
255:
234:
203:
145:
59:
19:
2531:Ah! Well, this is why we have
2465:As there is already an article
2336:Watch article reassessment page
615:is NOT on Smout's list or here.
407:This article has been rated as
302:This article has been rated as
2598:09:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
2560:17:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2527:10:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2513:16:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
2493:15:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
2479:14:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
2457:13:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
2427:09:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
2409:08:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
2387:08:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
2278:Forestry in the United Kingdom
2098:Name and scope of the article?
1902:01:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1882:00:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1862:19:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
1825:14:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
1763:09:02, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
736:16:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
709:15:14, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
685:14:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
502:13:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
478:11:57, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
452:20:06, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
69:has been listed as one of the
67:Forestry in the United Kingdom
1:
2617:Knowledge (XXG) good articles
2126:Forests in the United Kingdom
1629:Ancient semi-natural woodland
1594:English Woodland Grant Scheme
1289:It doesn't really talk about
911:21:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
888:20:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
876:10:50, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
846:08:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
821:00:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
381:and see a list of open tasks.
285:Template:WikiProject Forestry
276:and see a list of open tasks.
40:. Please add comments to the
2172:19:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
2153:18:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
2119:07:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
2060:19:51, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
2031:20:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
1693:See what you think now. Â :)â
1653:Native and historic species
1503:is not allowed in the lead.
175:The text of the entry was:
34:reassessed by the community
2668:
2632:GA-Class Forestry articles
2586:List of forests in Ireland
2267:11:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
2248:09:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
2228:09:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
2090:09:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
2080:rather than this article?
1969:15:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
1225:there was a mix of "Smout
413:project's importance scale
370:WikiProject United Kingdom
308:project's importance scale
183:trees on the British Isles
2213:19:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
2194:15:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
1782:11:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
1736:07:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
1711:22:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
1454:16:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
1014:07:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
975:10:46, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
800:21:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
768:Thanks for your interest!
763:21:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
650:(Whortle-leaved willow),
406:
339:
301:
250:
229:
105:
101:
32:of this article is being
2017:20:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
1994:10:40, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
756:National Forest, England
1930:
1037:reasonably well written
393:United Kingdom articles
1395:(appropriate use with
613:Sorbus pseudomeinichii
211:This article is rated
1926:Charter of the Forest
1787:Lead section is awful
1590:Woodland Grant Scheme
1370:It is illustrated by
1316:neutral point of view
1257:broad in its coverage
362:United Kingdom portal
215:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
79:good article criteria
38:good article criteria
1924:, nothing about the
1592:was replaced by the
992:elephant in the room
745:Should something on
604:Sorbus pseudofennica
265:WikiProject Forestry
131:Good article nominee
1944:Forestry Commission
1383:fair use rationales
1238:the citation 1966).
646:(Mountain willow),
30:good article status
2341:Most recent review
1490:This is fixed now.
1351:No edit wars, etc.
1109:factually accurate
929:GA review material
717:S. pseudomeinichii
652:Salix myrsinifolia
640:Salix phylicifolia
602:(Rock Whitebeam),
541:Crataegus monogyna
516:Fraxinus excelsior
217:content assessment
169:September 15, 2009
106:Article milestones
2558:
2511:
2441:
2415:Forests in Turkey
2407:
2151:
2104:Forests of Sweden
2078:Forest in Germany
1966:
1965:}} me in replies)
1860:
1745:
1744:
1709:
1397:suitable captions
1334:No problems here.
909:
874:
798:
608:Sorbus arranensis
596:Scottish exotica:
430:Scottish conifers
427:
426:
423:
422:
419:
418:
318:
317:
314:
313:
288:Forestry articles
197:
196:
140:
139:
97:
54:
53:
43:reassessment page
2659:
2550:
2503:
2437:
2399:
2338:
2332:
2323:
2304:
2159:Forest in Turkey
2143:
2075:
1980:
1967:
1956:
1955:
1933:
1870:history of Malta
1852:
1850:
1724:Trees of Britain
1701:
1699:
1685:
1670:
1662:
1638:
1614:
1583:
1564:
1549:
1521:
1502:
1501:
1478:
1441:
1413:
1406:
1392:
1358:
1331:
1288:
1281:
1271:
1245:
1236:
1220:
1212:
1211:
1206:
1183:
1175:
1166:Botanical garden
1163:
1156:
1143:
1134:reliable sources
1129:
1089:
1072:
1065:
1051:
1003:
984:
925:
901:
899:
866:
864:
811:Feckenham Forest
790:
788:
758:get a mention?â
733:
728:
723:
706:
696:
682:
677:
672:
656:Salix reticulata
648:Salix myrsinites
638:(Downy willow),
553:Sorbus aucuparia
545:Corylus avellana
524:Betula pubescens
499:
489:
475:
470:
465:
459:Arran Whitebeams
449:
444:
439:
395:
394:
391:
388:
385:
364:
359:
358:
357:
348:
341:
340:
335:
327:
320:
290:
289:
286:
283:
280:
259:
252:
251:
246:
238:
231:
214:
208:
207:
206:
199:
186:exceed those of
149:
126:
103:
86:
63:
56:
23:
16:
2667:
2666:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2602:
2601:
2582:
2334:
2313:
2290:
2284:
2281:
2274:
2272:GA Reassessment
2255:
2236:
2201:
2182:
2100:
2069:
2043:
1974:
1951:
1950:
1922:Sherwood Forest
1910:
1888:In addition in
1846:
1789:
1770:
1768:Missing section
1755:Ordinary Person
1751:
1746:
1695:
1678:
1655:
1631:
1557:
1538:Footnote added.
1499:
1498:
1471:
1313:It follows the
1264:(major aspects)
1209:
1208:
1169:
943:This review is
939:
930:
895:
860:
784:
743:
731:
726:
721:
705:
702:
692:
680:
675:
670:
644:Salix arbuscala
600:Sorbus rupicola
590:Viburnum opulus
549:Ilex aquifolium
520:Populus tremula
512:Alnus glutinosa
498:
495:
485:
473:
468:
463:
447:
442:
437:
432:
392:
389:
386:
383:
382:
360:
355:
353:
333:
287:
284:
281:
278:
277:
244:
212:
193:
192:
188:mainland Europe
173:
122:
50:
12:
11:
5:
2665:
2663:
2655:
2654:
2649:
2644:
2639:
2634:
2629:
2624:
2619:
2614:
2604:
2603:
2581:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2346:Result pending
2343:
2280:
2275:
2273:
2270:
2254:
2251:
2235:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2200:
2197:
2181:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2099:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2063:
2062:
2042:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
1997:
1996:
1909:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1885:
1884:
1865:
1864:
1788:
1785:
1769:
1766:
1750:
1747:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1688:
1687:
1677:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1664:
1654:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1641:
1640:
1630:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1617:
1616:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1598:
1597:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1567:
1566:
1556:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1533:
1532:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1505:
1504:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1485:
1484:
1470:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1425:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1416:
1368:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1341:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1311:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1253:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1239:
1230:
1214:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1177:
1132:(citations to
1105:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1032:
1031:
1017:
1016:
996:
995:
987:
986:
954:
953:
938:
935:
932:
931:
928:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
851:
850:
849:
848:
826:
825:
824:
823:
803:
802:
782:Thanks again!â
781:
780:
778:
777:
774:
773:
770:
769:
742:
739:
712:
711:
703:
660:
659:
636:Salix lapponum
621:
618:
617:
616:
597:
593:
592:
586:Sambucus nigra
578:Prunus spinosa
571:
528:Betula pendula
505:
504:
496:
431:
428:
425:
424:
421:
420:
417:
416:
409:Mid-importance
405:
399:
398:
396:
384:United Kingdom
379:the discussion
375:United Kingdom
366:
365:
349:
337:
336:
334:Midâimportance
331:United Kingdom
328:
316:
315:
312:
311:
304:Mid-importance
300:
294:
293:
291:
274:the discussion
260:
248:
247:
245:Midâimportance
239:
227:
226:
220:
209:
195:
194:
174:
153:
152:
150:
142:
141:
138:
137:
134:
127:
119:
118:
115:
112:
108:
107:
99:
98:
64:
52:
51:
26:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2664:
2653:
2650:
2648:
2645:
2643:
2640:
2638:
2635:
2633:
2630:
2628:
2625:
2623:
2620:
2618:
2615:
2613:
2610:
2609:
2607:
2600:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2579:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2548:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2501:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2490:
2486:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2440:
2435:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2397:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2373:
2368:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2353:
2352:GA criteria:
2347:
2344:
2342:
2337:
2331:
2330:
2326:
2321:
2317:
2312:
2311:
2307:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2289:
2288:
2283:
2282:
2279:
2276:
2271:
2269:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2252:
2250:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2210:
2206:
2198:
2196:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2179:
2173:
2169:
2165:
2160:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2141:
2136:
2132:
2131:Royal forests
2127:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2107:
2105:
2097:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2073:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2044:
2040:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2005:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1995:
1992:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1978:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1964:
1960:
1954:
1947:
1945:
1941:
1940:Epping Forest
1937:
1932:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1886:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1866:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1849:
1843:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1836:
1832:
1827:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1812:
1808:
1807:
1803:
1800:
1797:
1792:
1786:
1784:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1767:
1765:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1748:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1698:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1684:
1680:
1679:
1675:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1656:
1652:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1637:
1633:
1632:
1628:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1613:
1609:
1608:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1584:According to
1582:
1578:
1577:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1563:
1559:
1558:
1554:
1548:
1544:
1543:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1520:
1516:
1515:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1496:
1495:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1482:
1477:
1473:
1472:
1468:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1440:
1435:
1432:
1431:
1429:
1426:
1424:
1417:
1412:
1408:
1407:
1405:
1400:
1398:
1391:
1386:
1384:
1378:
1377:
1375:
1374:
1369:
1367:
1360:
1359:
1357:
1352:
1349:
1348:
1346:
1342:
1340:
1333:
1332:
1330:
1325:
1322:
1321:
1319:
1317:
1312:
1310:
1301:
1300:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1287:
1283:
1282:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1261:
1260:
1258:
1254:
1252:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1219:
1215:
1205:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1182:
1178:
1173:
1167:
1162:
1158:
1157:
1155:
1150:
1148:
1142:
1137:
1135:
1128:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1116:
1115:
1110:
1106:
1104:
1097:
1092:
1091:
1088:
1084:
1079:
1078:
1076:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1064:
1059:
1057:
1050:
1045:
1041:
1040:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1030:for criteria)
1029:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1002:
998:
997:
993:
989:
988:
983:
979:
978:
977:
976:
972:
968:
965:
961:
957:
952:
950:
946:
941:
940:
936:
934:
933:
927:
926:
912:
908:
904:
900:
898:
891:
890:
889:
886:
883:
879:
878:
877:
873:
869:
865:
863:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
847:
844:
841:
838:
834:
833:royal forests
830:
829:
828:
827:
822:
819:
816:
812:
807:
806:
805:
804:
801:
797:
793:
789:
787:
767:
766:
765:
764:
761:
757:
753:
748:
747:Royal forests
740:
738:
737:
734:
729:
724:
718:
710:
707:
699:
697:
695:
689:
688:
687:
686:
683:
678:
673:
666:
663:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
624:Salix cinerea
622:
619:
614:
611:
610:
609:
605:
601:
598:
595:
594:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
572:
569:
568:
567:
564:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
508:
503:
500:
492:
490:
488:
482:
481:
480:
479:
476:
471:
466:
460:
454:
453:
450:
445:
440:
429:
414:
410:
404:
401:
400:
397:
380:
376:
372:
371:
363:
352:
350:
347:
343:
342:
338:
332:
329:
326:
322:
309:
305:
299:
296:
295:
292:
275:
271:
267:
266:
261:
258:
254:
253:
249:
243:
240:
237:
233:
228:
224:
218:
210:
201:
200:
191:
189:
185:
184:
180:
171:
170:
165:
163:
162:Did you know?
157:
151:
148:
144:
143:
135:
133:
132:
128:
125:
124:July 19, 2010
121:
120:
116:
113:
110:
109:
104:
100:
95:
93:
92:
84:
80:
76:
75:
74:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
47:
45:
44:
39:
35:
31:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2583:
2546:
2540:
2499:
2438:
2433:
2395:
2369:
2354:
2351:
2345:
2328:
2324:
2310:Article talk
2309:
2308:
2305:
2286:
2256:
2237:
2202:
2183:
2139:
2108:
2101:
2009:Gog the Mild
2003:
1985:
1984:
1948:
1911:
1869:
1847:
1828:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1804:
1801:
1795:
1793:
1790:
1774:Simply south
1771:
1752:
1696:
1500:{{see also}}
1433:
1427:
1394:
1380:
1371:
1350:
1344:
1323:
1314:
1296:
1290:
1273:
1263:
1256:
1226:
1222:
1144:
1131:
1122:(references)
1121:
1112:
1108:
1053:
1043:
1036:
1020:
991:
963:
962:
958:
955:
942:
896:
861:
785:
744:
716:
713:
693:
667:
664:
661:
632:Salix lanata
628:Salix aurita
565:
561:Ulmus glabra
557:Salix caprea
539:
536:Prunus avium
532:Prunus padus
509:
506:
486:
455:
433:
408:
368:
303:
263:
223:WikiProjects
181:
176:
167:
159:
129:
89:
87:
83:please do so
71:
70:
66:
48:
41:
27:
2297:visual edit
2041:GAR request
1961:; please {{
1953:OwenBlacker
1894:GliderMaven
1874:GliderMaven
1831:GliderMaven
1817:GliderMaven
1075:WP:MOSBEGIN
945:transcluded
882:Jim Killock
840:Jim Killock
815:Jim Killock
582:Rosa canina
574:Betula nana
179:broadleaved
2606:Categories
2547:SÂ Marshall
2500:SÂ Marshall
2396:SÂ Marshall
2140:SÂ Marshall
1977:S Marshall
1931:Andreswald
1918:Robin Hood
1848:S Marshall
1842:WP:GOODDEF
1697:S Marshall
1210:{{harvnb}}
1114:verifiable
897:S Marshall
862:S Marshall
786:S Marshall
694:S Marshall
487:S Marshall
166:column on
77:under the
2253:Harv refs
2199:Purposes?
1936:The Weald
1908:GA review
1434:Pass/Fail
1415:Disease).
1274:(focused)
964:Reviewer:
937:GA Review
156:Main Page
1596:in 2005.
1572:Removed.
1529:Scotland
1292:forestry
1172:cite web
893:though.â
776:article.
772:forests.
620:Willows:
279:Forestry
270:forestry
242:Forestry
213:GA-class
91:reassess
2590:Chidgk1
2580:Ireland
2519:Chidgk1
2471:Chidgk1
2419:Chidgk1
2379:Chidgk1
2320:history
2301:history
2287:Article
2259:Chidgk1
2240:Chidgk1
2220:Chidgk1
2205:Chidgk1
2186:Chidgk1
2164:Chidgk1
2111:Chidgk1
2082:Chidgk1
1890:WP:LEAD
1728:Si Trew
1676:Threats
1555:History
1525:England
1481:WP:LEAD
1446:Si Trew
1428:Overall
1297:forests
1044:(prose)
1006:Si Trew
967:Si Trew
411:on the
306:on the
158:in the
114:Process
2584:I see
2533:WP:LST
2068:Hello
1991:(talk)
1603:Added.
1588:, the
1373:images
1345:stable
1343:It is
1318:policy
1255:It is
1227:et. al
1223:et al.
1107:It is
1035:It is
1024:review
885:(talk)
843:(talk)
818:(talk)
219:scale.
136:Listed
117:Result
2329:Watch
2072:Szzuk
2052:Szzuk
2048:WP:OR
2023:Szzuk
1080:Done.
1026:(see
947:from
2594:talk
2544:to!â
2541:then
2523:talk
2489:talk
2475:talk
2453:talk
2423:talk
2383:talk
2316:edit
2293:edit
2263:talk
2244:talk
2224:talk
2209:talk
2190:talk
2168:talk
2115:talk
2086:talk
2056:talk
2027:talk
2013:talk
1986:corn
1963:ping
1959:talk
1920:and
1898:talk
1878:talk
1835:talk
1821:talk
1778:talk
1759:talk
1732:talk
1527:and
1497:The
1469:Lead
1450:talk
1221:For
1111:and
1028:here
1010:talk
971:talk
704:Cont
497:Cont
111:Date
28:The
2485:MPF
2463:MPF
2449:MPF
2434:not
2004:not
1983:AIR
1796:new
1056:MoS
760:Rod
732:Dui
727:Mac
722:Ben
681:Dui
676:Mac
671:Ben
530:,
474:Dui
469:Mac
464:Ben
448:Dui
443:Mac
438:Ben
403:Mid
298:Mid
2608::
2596:)
2525:)
2491:)
2477:)
2455:)
2425:)
2385:)
2339:â˘
2333:â˘
2318:|
2299:|
2295:|
2265:)
2246:)
2226:)
2211:)
2192:)
2170:)
2117:)
2106:.
2088:)
2058:)
2029:)
2015:)
1938:,
1934:,
1900:)
1880:)
1844:.â
1837:)
1823:)
1780:)
1761:)
1734:)
1452:)
1436::
1430::
1401::
1393:b
1387::
1379:a
1353::
1347:.
1326::
1320:.
1276::
1272:b
1266::
1262:a
1259:.
1174:}}
1170:{{
1151::
1147:OR
1138::
1130:b
1124::
1120:a
1117:.
1077:.
1060::
1052:b
1046::
1042:a
1039:.
1022:GA
1012:)
973:)
654:,
642:,
634:,
630:,
626:,
606:,
588:,
584:,
580:,
576:,
563:.
559:,
555:,
547:,
543:,
534:,
526:,
522:,
518:,
514:,
94:it
85:.
46:.
2592:(
2556:C
2554:/
2552:T
2521:(
2509:C
2507:/
2505:T
2487:(
2473:(
2461:@
2451:(
2421:(
2405:C
2403:/
2401:T
2381:(
2325:¡
2322:)
2314:(
2306:¡
2303:)
2291:(
2261:(
2242:(
2222:(
2207:(
2188:(
2166:(
2149:C
2147:/
2145:T
2113:(
2084:(
2074::
2070:@
2054:(
2025:(
2011:(
1979::
1975:@
1957:(
1896:(
1876:(
1858:C
1856:/
1854:T
1833:(
1819:(
1776:(
1757:(
1730:(
1707:C
1705:/
1703:T
1483:.
1448:(
1399:)
1385:)
1176:.
1149:)
1145:(
1136:)
1058:)
1054:(
1008:(
969:(
907:C
905:/
903:T
872:C
870:/
868:T
796:C
794:/
792:T
700:/
658:.
493:/
415:.
310:.
225::
190:?
172:.
164:"
160:"
96:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
