Knowledge

Talk:Ferrous metallurgy

Source đź“ť

1578:
core, sides, and cutting edge to take maximum advantage of high and low carbon steel. The edge was high carbon steel, hard but brittle, and capable of taking and retaining a razors edge. The core was a softer but more durable low carbon steel to stand up to the stress of tremendous impacts. The sides and back fell somewhere in between. All three types were forge welded together to create a weapon of unsurpassed complexity and deadliness. The technology was by no means limited to weapons of war either. Items such as woodworking tools were frequently laminated from hard and soft steel to create chisels and handplane blades that were far ahead of their contemporaries in the west. I know most of these developments took place at a later date - 900AD to 1500AD and that there is a Japanese Sword section already, I just thought it might be worth a mention, or at least a cross link to another article.
556: 535: 461: 84: 451: 430: 362: 189: 341: 168: 683:. It incorporates adverse comments made in respect of the prehistoric sections and the referecnes that they cited. However, in doing this, I have written about matters beyond my expertise, which relates (at most) to the medieval period onwards. It is possible (for example) that the sources cited do not support statements apparently reliant on them. This part of the article urgently requires the attention of some one who does know the sources. 275: 1557:-- Africa is a big place. Sub-Saharan Africa is an appropriate unit to deal with. The Near East and Middle East have only weak linkages with it, because there is a vast desert between. The question is what happened, not how we would like to classify it. When this article was created By merging several others, I asked an expert to check (and amend) the article. The editor who actually did so is a professor at the Institute of Archaeology. 257: 74: 53: 285: 22: 1223: 766:
and skill of the champions who wielded these iron weapons would also add to the majesty associated with them. And from that start, human storytelling began weaving tall tales, as it tends to do. I need only point out the legends of Pecos Bill and Paul Bunyan for the kinds of over-the-top fiction mankind can come up with using a kernel of truth. --Sunder the Gold
2367: 2353: 2343: 628: 1320:
Clarification: The article claims "smelting of iron in bloomeries began in the 12th century BC," yet mention is made of a dagger of smelted iron dating to 2500 BC. It's implied that the dagger is of smelted, non-meteoritic, iron, and what I've read elsewhere seems to bear this out... does anyone have
1299:
in 1556 has a lot of information on the identification of ore sources prior to modern prospecting techniques such as the us of vegetation associated with certain ores, soil types, color, and smell amongst others. While the book may not refer to "ancient" techniques per say, I highly recommend reading
1134:
Having looked, I still do not think it is exactly a history book. It is dealing with technical issues on the metallography of iron and steel artefacts. I think that most of the historical and archaeological information is derivative. Buchwald looks a valuable book, but deals with the period that I
740:
Some one has added a series of reference to Europe from Needham. I am likely to remove or amend these shortly. Needham's work was primarily on China, not Europe, and it is now 40 years old. It thus does not take account of more recent discoveries. We know rather more of ancient metallurgy than we
2268:
There probably is such an alloy, and at a guess it would be one of the high temperature nickel alloys. Yet even these (Inconel is 70% nickel and more chrome than iron) are usually termed nickel alloys, even though they contain a high iron content. They're obscure alloys though and my point remains –
1908:
The article is intneded to be mainly about the production of iron and steel, rather than about the fabrication of artefacts, which is probably best left for a more specific article. We have a terminological issue in splitting out steel. Why should we have bar iron (0%C) and pig iron (4-5%C) in one
758:
Mythic weapons such as Lugh's spear and Nuada's Claiomh Solais might have been made of meteoric iron. Various accounts claim that the Tuatha De Danaan had knowledge of occult magics that allowed them to create these mighty weapons -- access to meteoric iron and the know-how to forge it into weaponry
765:
Most of the magical abilities of these mythic weapons might have their explainations in the superior luster of iron to stone or bronze, the superior strength of meteoric iron to bronze, and the overall divine air that a weapon made from a fallen star would have. "A gift from the gods." The strength
2420:
You know, maybe it would've helped if you had explained your reasoning rather than just reverting again and again. If the external link is only relevant to a specific section and would not be accepted at the end, then it doesn't belong in the article. We could just as well copy in all the external
2180:
I think the article should start off with a statement of what ferrous metallurgy is, rather than immediately jumping into history. The sensible decision was made not to move it to "History of ferrous metallurgy" since a statement of what ferrous metallurgy is needs to be made before talking about
1674:
IMHO, the present title is rather cumbersome, and I realized that the subject of the article is perhaps essentially the English word "ironmaking" (with some elements of steelmaking thrown in for context), with an emphasis on the overall history. The article is functionally analogous to a similarly
1577:
Why are is there no mention of Japanese metallurgy in this article when their tradecraft was extremely advanced and their understanding of the varying carbon contents of steel was virtually unsurpassed? The production of a traditional Katana blade, for example uses multiple types of steel for the
1040:
I feared as much, but did not delete it when I pruned the section in March, because it was at least faintly related to iron, whereas what I deleted was about Islamic technology generally. Some of it may be Muslim acheivements, but other portions may be derived from the Roman world but lost to the
783:
Some one (unlogged-in) added the view that there was no difference in principle between a bloomery and a blast furance (except size), togeterh with unhelful comparisons with modern steelmaking. I believe that the contributir was trying to be helpful, but failed to be. I have accordingly reverted
1658:
on the article page and a request without a template on the talk page Reason given "IMHO, the present title is rather cumbersome, and I realized that the subject of the article is perhaps essentially the English word "ironmaking" (with some elements of steelmaking thrown in for context), with an
1703:
I agree that the title is cumbersome. However, it is intended to be an overview article, covering all aspects of iron and steel: bar iron (~0% C), steel (0.5-2% C) and pig iron (4-5% C). This should lead the reader on to more detailed articels on particular aspects. I think I established its
1159:
I was wondering if there is any information regarding the methods used by the ancients, and even those in the middle ages, to identify a particular rock as being iron ore. I didn't see anything in this article about it. What methods were used? Do historians even know what they did to identify a
2034:
I don't get it. You want this to be a spinoff of an article that doesn't exist? It doesn't matter how much pruning occurs; we'll always have the article in its current state in the history. Show me a bunch of "History of Foo" articles without a corresponding "Foo" and my mind could be changed.
2433:, etc. and have an EL subsection for every section. This is why I don't approve of throwing a commons link in the middle of the article. I have absolutely no problem ignoring the MOS or any other rule that would get in the way of improving the encyclopedia, but that isn't the issue here. — 1525:
Lets have a holistic view of iron working in Africa as a whole.I think we should merge Iron working in North eastern Africa with the rest of Africa instead of taking it to Near East.We can for instance have it shown by regions e.g East Africa,West Africa,South Africa and North Africa.
1011:
During the ] and ], ], ] and ] were making significant advances in metallurgy. Muslim engineers invented the first ]s. By the 11th century, every province throughout the Islamic world had these industrial mills in operation, from ] and ] to the Middle East and ].<ref name=Lucas-10:
1203:
and that iron carburizing was known process in the Middle East at about 1200BC (this could be a byproduct discovery of iron production process). I guess that they just identified minerals rich with iron ore by sight. But I will look for additional information on the web to answer
774:
If this section is referring to the Old Assyrian trading network most famous from the finds at Kanesh, can we properly call these people Hittites? They were the ancestors to the Hittites, yes, but I'm not sure the name is justified in that use. Any ideas as to a better term?
1892:
There is no mention of case-hardened steel, an early method. Also the article could benefit from the separation of iron production - wrought and cast - from that of steel. Incidentally, Anglo-Saxon knives have been excavated with surgical-steel like properties.
1504:
So what? The Quran is a religious text for Muslims, written 14 centuries ago. It cannot contain useful historical information on earlier eras. This may contrast with the Hebrew Bible where it is dealing with historical events in its historical books.
1909:
article and steel (0.5-2%C) in another: it does not make sense. I created this article some years ago, trying to sort out a muddle that previously existed, to provide a general overview of the subject, with sub-articles on particualrly topics.
2015:
The worst case would be for this article to stay under the new title, then to be pruned progressively to be simply the current understanding of metallurgy, and we lose the historical aspect that's already written. That would be a sizable loss.
2084:; it's not the usual RM but I think Andy Dingley's argument is persuasive. The current content is primarily about the history; moving it to an appropriate title will serve readers better, and make room to build a much-needed general article. 759:
would be a sufficiently advanced technology indistinguishable from magic to other cultures and the common man. In fact, wasn't Damascus steel thought to be magically derived, since it was unparalleled for strength and sharpness in its time?
1478:, in which is (material for) mighty war, as well as many benefits for mankind, that Allah may test who it is that will help, Unseen, Him and His messengers: For Allah is Full of Strength, Exalted in Might (and able to enforce His Will)." 1778:
Nono, the article on ironmongery is a far more specific term, and blacksmithin is shaping iron that has already been refined. This article is about the history of refining iron ore into iron (and steel), not what is done with the
2065:(as that's what it was written as), but it's a poorly structured article if read as a summary of present metallurgy, and it would be a shame to damage that good historical article in the efforts to turn it into something else. 1481:
if you see arabic text "anzalna" means "we sent down. Human doesnt know this truth 1400 years ago. and about this verse because of that point there was many questions from unbelievers past time. But now it is very Clear.
971:, p.65. Both cover much the same material and refer to a variety of industries, but not to iron or steel. Accordingly the material is cited from a false reference. This leads me to think that the statements are wrong. 1013:
Adam Robert Lucas (2005), "Industrial Milling in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds: A Survey of the Evidence for an Industrial Revolution in Medieval Europe", ''Technology and Culture'' '''46''' (1), p. 1-30 .</ref:
2401:
So far you have demonstrated that you think everyone must observe MOS slavishly, yet 3RR is optional. You are also prioritising a simplistic interpretation of MOS over readability. Neither of these are constructive.
1017:
were invented by Muslim engineers for many ] uses, such as ] before extraction. In order to adapt ]s for gristmilling purposes, ]s were used for raising and releasing ]s to fall on a material.<ref name=Hill2:
115: 1850:."Ironmaking" is far too narrow. If we did rename to ironmaking, I'd expect that to be rapidly followed up by one of the pointier-haired deletomins blanking any coverage of Bessemer, as "it wasn't ironmaking". 1683:
redirects here, why is it not the simpler title of the same?)- as history is a usual component for most pages, why is in the article title, rather than a section or focus. I propose moving the page then to
2397:
section, not necessarily External links, as this is for CSS box float reasons, not for content placement. MOS is also quite clear that such a section should not be created to hold such a link in its own
606: 755:
I was always curious why men would attribute supernatural properties to the weapons of certain heroes. A little studying here on Knowledge has allowed me to come up with a satisfying hypothesis.
1243:
The simplest way would be "look for rust". Seriously, iron ore readily oxidizes to form iron oxide (rust), so there will be the characteristic reddish color of rust wherever you have iron ore.
1829:, but the lead may need to be changed to make it clear that this is a primarily a historical article, preferably with a link to an article concerned with metalurgy as a scientifiic subject. 2633: 1679:, of which some of the material might be better suited in focus, rather than include the whole of both iron and steelmaking, without an appropriate umbrella page. (Alternatively, though 1708:
would certainly he an option, but would that not lead to the article being swamped by recent stuff? On the other hand, perhaps we need more on recent developments anyway. The move to
2181:
its history, but I don't see that this has been done. My guess is it ceases to be a question ferrous metallurgy when the iron component of an alloy drops below some threshhold?
2578: 725:
You are correct about 'from'. However the interpretation of Ur of the Chaldeans is essentially an issue of Biblical interpreation and should not be relevant to this article.
140: 2265:
50% iron, or only a small proportion of iron. I can think of no equivalent to brass or solder and the comparable proportions of zinc/copper or tin/lead found in those alloys.
1351:
was removed, since it does not pertain specifically to iron metallurgy or repeats what had already been said. Perhaps it can be used in some otehr article. All the best, --
1261:
That sounds reasonable. I was curious but noticed the relevant articles lacking in any indication of how iron ore was identified before modern geological techniques. Thanks.
150: 2583: 937:
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
1625:. By cutting the words "History of" the title becomes less cumbersome, addressing one of the nominators points, but "Ironmaking" as an option did not gather support. 2628: 507: 2593: 2511: 2507: 2493: 1474:"We sent aforetime our messengers with Clear Signs and sent down with them the Book and the Balance(of Right and Wrong), that men may stand forth in justice; and 229: 1019:
Donald Routledge Hill, "Mechanical Engineering in the Medieval Near East", ''Scientific American'', May 1991, p. 64-69. (] Donald Routledge Hill, )</ref: -->
239: 110: 2573: 2119:. It looks as if what's needed is some content adding about the subject in general. The history stuff can all be moved to its own section, and then split to 806: 2613: 412: 402: 2371: 2603: 810: 106: 97: 58: 2648: 2623: 2618: 596: 205: 2053:
The point is less about what we have now and more about where we want to end up. The topic is major enough that we have a strong need for both
2588: 2357: 517: 1117: 960:
A lot of material has been added about milling in general, bit this has little or nothing to do with metallurgy, let alone ferrous metallurgy.
307: 2598: 378: 2479: 1945:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1612:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
2653: 2638: 2608: 2317:
This is getting ridiculous, let's discuss. Why exactly do we need commons links in the middle of an article, in direct contradiction to
1812: 1765: 1489: 1322: 704:
Second paragraph, end of paragraph: I do not think it could be properly said that any particular place was where iron was "invented".
196: 173: 2489:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1965: 1542: 1262: 1161: 572: 483: 298: 262: 1102:
does not sound like a specialist book on history. I suspect that any historical sections will be derived from better sources.
2643: 1199:
Thats a good question, but I've no good answer. All I can tell is that iron made tools from 2000BC were found in what was once
369: 346: 1080: 1069: 883: 784:
from these: the additions are too simplistic. If they should be added at all, the correct place is probably in the article
1471:
In quran Surah (chapter) 57 name is Hadid means Iron. Verse 25 has very interesting for this topic. English traslation is
2058: 1926: 1847: 1641: 1459: 814: 799: 2378:, we have links related to the overall topic of an article and so we link the overall article. MOS states that we should 2347: 1370: 2554: 2264:
Those are ferrous alloys. Iron is the majority in all of them. I can think offhand of no alloys that aren't either : -->
33: 986:: the article did not allege the production of pig iron, so that at best this is a misuse of the term; at worst it is 563: 540: 474: 435: 105:
content on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
102: 2196:
Call it 50%. "Ferrous alloys" have far more than this. Alloys with less, where iron still has any significance (see
555: 534: 482:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
956:
Whoever added material on milling in the medieval Islamic world has been trying to exaggerate their contribution:
821:
article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
1936: 1603: 1346: 89: 2510:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2218:
Whatever the largest % portion. If it's 40% iron, 30% copper and 30% nickel, it would still be a ferrous alloy.
2008:
is heading that way, yet it would essentially require coverage across both iron and steel. Still we also need a
1457:. The tempering of steel was brought in ancient India to a perfection unknown in Europe till our own times;... 817:'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for 2382:
do this at the end of at article, which no-one disagrees with. However in this case, a section-specific link
2269:
when iron is used in an alloy it's either the majority, or a very small component, not something in-between.
1493: 2545: 2471: 2186: 1914: 1834: 1816: 1769: 1721: 1562: 1510: 1415: 1326: 1140: 1107: 1046: 995: 653: 1585: 1118:
http://books.google.com/books?id=n9pRE-4W8XIC&printsec=frontcover&dq=related:ISBN8773043087#PPR9,M1
2407: 2274: 2237: 2209: 2129: 2070: 2061:, as both have distinct needs from their separate readerships. The article content we have here is on the 2021: 1855: 1784: 1693: 1356: 1005:
A lot of this type of stuff gets "cut and pasted" all over Knowledge getting more garbled with each move.
2529:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2517: 2166: 1946: 1878: 1712:
would involve overwriting the redirect, which requires the involvemetn of an admin, via a nomination at
1613: 926: 913: 898: 887: 872: 861: 846: 835: 39: 2470:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2480:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071225091836/http://home.swipnet.se/islam/articles/HistoryofSciences.htm
1581: 2292: 2255: 2223: 1962: 1538: 1530: 1485: 1276: 1175: 715:. Also, can it be said with any certainty that there were two different Urs, or which one was which? 1704:
present structure, but then had to ask an expert to deal with the prehistoric aspects. Renaming to
21: 2089: 1655: 1630: 1301: 941: 918: 716: 661: 571:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
377:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
306:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
204:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2463: 2182: 2106: 2054: 1997: 1977: 1910: 1898: 1830: 1826: 1804: 1717: 1709: 1705: 1680: 1558: 1506: 1423: 1305: 1136: 1103: 1042: 991: 789: 742: 726: 691: 2514:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2530: 1083:, 9788773043080. I've been looking at google books,this ones got good stuff on northern Europe. 2483: 2441: 2403: 2329: 2270: 2233: 2205: 2110: 2066: 2017: 1851: 1780: 1689: 1651: 1450: 1352: 1296: 1189: 1077: 1066: 930: 902: 876: 850: 690:, and relates to the the early paragraphs of the 'Bloomery Iron in the Middle East' section. 660:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
450: 429: 290: 1248: 1230: 1209: 1125: 1088: 1030: 640: 2537: 2288: 2251: 2219: 2143: 1959: 1534: 1292: 1269: 1168: 963:
Some of the material apparently on metallurgy was cited from Lucas, 'Industrial Milling',
1192: 361: 340: 188: 167: 2496:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2247: 2085: 1688:
or the likes, and if need be, spinning of elements, or splitting as need be. Thoughts?
1626: 1016:] (1996), "Engineering", p. 781, in {{Harv|Rashed|Morelon|1996|pp=751-95}}</ref: --> 938: 2536:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1061:
My writing skills are not very good. But I have a couple of good sources to recomend.
762:
And at least one such mythic weapon, Mjollnir, WAS said to have been "a fallen star."
274: 256: 73: 52: 2567: 2422: 2318: 2040: 1894: 1761: 1739: 1664: 2434: 2322: 2156: 2102: 2001: 1868: 1713: 1411: 1375: 987: 983: 975: 466: 201: 2135:). The remaining content would form a stub on the subject of ferrous metallurgy. 2503: 2284: 1757: 1676: 1407: 1341: 1244: 1226: 1205: 1200: 1121: 1084: 1026: 831: 2390:
MOS, as MOS recognises that it is only stating the one simple and general case.
809:
to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
2502:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2165:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
2138: 1877:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1685: 1435: 1076:
Vagn Fabritius Buchwald Published by Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 2005
456: 303: 284: 280: 79: 2559: 2446: 2411: 2334: 2296: 2278: 2259: 2241: 2227: 2213: 2197: 2190: 2147: 2093: 2074: 2044: 2025: 1970: 1918: 1902: 1859: 1838: 1820: 1788: 1773: 1743: 1725: 1697: 1668: 1634: 1589: 1566: 1546: 1514: 1497: 1360: 1330: 1309: 1283: 1252: 1234: 1213: 1182: 1144: 1129: 1111: 1092: 1050: 1034: 999: 946: 909: 857: 792: 745: 729: 719: 694: 675:
This article is the result of merging sections that appeared in articles on
374: 2366: 2352: 2342: 2430: 2426: 2036: 1735: 1660: 1419: 1379: 979: 785: 1406:
were far ahead of Europe in industrial chemistry; they were masters of
1387: 648:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
1399: 2004:
level) an article on precisely that. Perhaps we already have one -
1454: 1443: 1439: 1427: 1403: 1395: 680: 568: 479: 2005: 1446: 1431: 1391: 1300:
it for information on pre-industrial ore prospecting methods. --
687: 676: 2393:
Also please note that MOS states that the links belong in the
1383: 1367: 923: 895: 869: 843: 622: 15: 2105:: without having notable significant non-historic content at 707:
Fourth paragraph, also end of paragraph: Abram and Lot came
686:
The following query was a comment in the discussion page of
2484:
http://home.swipnet.se/islam/articles/HistoryofSciences.htm
2012:
article, as ferrous metallurgy didn't emerge fully formed.
2474:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
109:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 813:
in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
1935:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
1602:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
2467: 2121: 2115: 1982: 1646: 1378:, as the most skilled of the nations in such chemical 916:, "Mechanical Engineering in the Medieval Near East", 890:, "Mechanical Engineering in the Medieval Near East", 864:, "Mechanical Engineering in the Medieval Near East", 838:, "Mechanical Engineering in the Medieval Near East", 2321:
saying external links belong in their own section? —
2246:
I just used a hypothetical example. You can see that
2155:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1867:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
978:, but that was involved in processes for converting 567:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 478:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 373:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 302:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 200:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2506:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1949:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1616:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1025:
This section is not supported by the sources cited.
2169:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1881:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1072:, 9783540209638. Its got a great history section. 2634:B-Class China-related articles of High-importance 1807:; or this could be a subarticle the way it is to 2386:. This is clearer for readers. It doesn't even 2492:This message was posted before February 2018. 1811:, should we add modern information to it. -- 1621:The result of the move request was: moved to 116:History of Science Collaboration of the Month 8: 1734:Can ironmaking be one word or is it two? -- 1135:am most intersted in only in the epilogue. 807:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting 2579:High-importance history of science articles 1225:. Seems like it should include an answer.-- 1063:The microstructure of steels and cast irons 2462:I have just modified one external link on 2176:How much iron makes it ferrous metallurgy? 1595:Proposed move to "Ironmaking" or otherwise 529: 424: 335: 251: 162: 47: 1659:emphasis on the overall history. ..." -- 101:, an attempt to improve and organize the 1160:certain rock as being iron ore? Thanks. 1116:Its not that bad see it at google books 125:Knowledge:WikiProject History of Science 2584:WikiProject History of Science articles 1321:any idea how this dagger was produced? 1065:Madeleine Durand-Charre Springer, 2004 652:] The anchor (History of steelmaking) 531: 426: 337: 253: 164: 128:Template:WikiProject History of Science 49: 19: 2629:High-importance China-related articles 2594:High-importance Metalworking articles 7: 1992:This article's content is about the 1954:The result of the move request was: 1374:" when India was looked to, even by 561:This article is within the scope of 472:This article is within the scope of 367:This article is within the scope of 296:This article is within the scope of 194:This article is within the scope of 2574:B-Class history of science articles 2000:is a huge topic and we require (to 751:Meteoric Iron and Legendary Weapons 38:It is of interest to the following 1521:Merge Ferrous metallurgy in Africa 1340:The following part of a quote from 214:Knowledge:WikiProject Metalworking 14: 2614:Low-importance Chemistry articles 2466:. Please take a moment to review 2372:Objects made from meteoritic iron 1650:– Request made 27 August 2012 by 1155:Identifying iron ore in antiquity 217:Template:WikiProject Metalworking 2365: 2351: 2341: 1442:powders, and the preparation of 626: 554: 533: 459: 449: 428: 360: 339: 316:Knowledge:WikiProject Technology 283: 273: 255: 187: 166: 82: 72: 51: 20: 2604:WikiProject Technology articles 2232:But are there any such alloys? 1074:Iron and steel in ancient times 770:Hittite trade in Meteoric Iron? 601:This article has been rated as 512:This article has been rated as 407:This article has been rated as 387:Knowledge:WikiProject Chemistry 319:Template:WikiProject Technology 234:This article has been rated as 145:This article has been rated as 2649:High-importance Craft articles 2624:B-Class China-related articles 2619:WikiProject Chemistry articles 1919:14:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 1903:18:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 1860:15:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 1839:14:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 1821:20:32, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1789:20:36, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1774:20:32, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1756:Isn't it traditionally called 947:03:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 884:Muslim Agricultural Revolution 390:Template:WikiProject Chemistry 113:. You can also help with the 98:History of Science WikiProject 1: 2589:B-Class Metalworking articles 2560:04:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC) 2358:history of ferrous metallurgy 2297:16:15, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 2279:15:54, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 2260:15:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 2242:12:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 2228:12:09, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 2214:23:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC) 2191:19:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC) 2122:history of ferrous metallurgy 2116:history of ferrous metallurgy 2059:History of ferrous metallurgy 1983:History of ferrous metallurgy 1927:History of ferrous metallurgy 1848:history of ferrous metallurgy 1744:17:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1669:17:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1642:History of ferrous metallurgy 1498:13:14, 25 December 2010 (UTC) 1402:... By the sixth century the 1284:15:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC) 1253:02:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC) 1235:17:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 1214:17:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 815:History of ferrous metallurgy 800:History of ferrous metallurgy 793:21:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 720:16:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 695:00:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 575:and see a list of open tasks. 486:and see a list of open tasks. 381:and see a list of open tasks. 310:and see a list of open tasks. 208:and see a list of open tasks. 2447:10:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 2412:10:15, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 2362:to one narrow aspect of this 2335:03:04, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 2148:13:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 1971:13:30, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 1361:07:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 1331:20:44, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1183:15:49, 6 November 2009 (UTC) 1015:The first ]ed ]s<ref: --> 95:This article is part of the 2599:B-Class Technology articles 2094:13:36, 7 October 2012 (UTC) 2075:09:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC) 2045:04:18, 7 October 2012 (UTC) 2026:20:00, 6 October 2012 (UTC) 1989:Restore to previous title. 1726:15:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 1698:02:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 1635:18:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC) 1567:19:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC) 1547:08:54, 2 January 2011 (UTC) 1515:19:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC) 1336:Material for other articles 1188:Responses here copied from 581:Knowledge:WikiProject Craft 492:Knowledge:WikiProject China 131:history of science articles 2670: 2654:WikiProject Craft articles 2639:WikiProject China articles 2609:B-Class Chemistry articles 2523:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2459:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2360:at Wikimedia Commons, but 1310:23:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC) 1000:15:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 779:Bloomery and blast furnace 584:Template:WikiProject Craft 518:project's importance scale 495:Template:WikiProject China 413:project's importance scale 240:project's importance scale 151:project's importance scale 2384:belongs with that section 1590:04:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 1347:The Story of Civilization 1145:22:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 1130:20:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 1112:21:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 1098:I know neither work, but 1093:20:25, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 1051:21:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 1035:20:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 746:16:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 730:16:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 711:Ur of the Chaldeans, not 600: 549: 511: 444: 406: 355: 268: 233: 182: 144: 90:History of science portal 67: 46: 2350:at Wikimedia Commons or 2162:Please do not modify it. 2109:, there's no need for a 1942:Please do not modify it. 1874:Please do not modify it. 1609:Please do not modify it. 1573:What about the Japanese? 1349:I: Our Oriental Heritage 1316:Origins of iron smelting 825:Reference named "Hill2": 805:I check pages listed in 197:WikiProject Metalworking 2455:External links modified 2374:at Wikimedia Commons. 2340:This is not a link for 1996:of ferrous metallurgy. 965:Technoloigy and Culture 894:, May 1991, pp. 64–9. ( 868:, May 1991, p. 64-69. ( 842:, May 1991, pp. 64-69 ( 798:Orphaned references in 2644:B-Class Craft articles 931:Mechanical Engineering 922:, May 1991, pp. 64-9 ( 903:Mechanical Engineering 877:Mechanical Engineering 851:Mechanical Engineering 498:China-related articles 299:WikiProject Technology 28:This article is rated 2125:(maybe after placing 967:46 (2005), 10 or his 927:Donald Routledge Hill 914:Donald Routledge Hill 899:Donald Routledge Hill 888:Donald Routledge Hill 873:Donald Routledge Hill 862:Donald Routledge Hill 847:Donald Routledge Hill 836:Donald Routledge Hill 370:WikiProject Chemistry 220:Metalworking articles 2504:regular verification 1426:, the production of 2494:After February 2018 1888:Case-hardened steel 1656:template:movenotice 919:Scientific American 892:Scientific American 866:Scientific American 840:Scientific American 811:orphaned references 322:Technology articles 2548:InternetArchiveBot 2499:InternetArchiveBot 2464:Ferrous metallurgy 2348:ferrous metallurgy 2107:Ferrous metallurgy 2055:Ferrous metallurgy 1998:Ferrous metallurgy 1978:Ferrous metallurgy 1827:Ferrous metallurgy 1825:I could live with 1809:ferrous metallurgy 1805:ferrous metallurgy 1710:Ferrous metallurgy 1706:Ferrous metallurgy 1681:ferrous metallurgy 1623:Ferrous metallurgy 1120:if youve got time 741:did in his time! 393:Chemistry articles 122:History of Science 103:history of science 59:History of Science 34:content assessment 2524: 2370:Media related to 2356:Media related to 2346:Media related to 1968: 1652:user:Morgan Riley 1550: 1533:comment added by 1488:comment added by 1476:We sent down Iron 1464: 1463: 1297:Georgius Agricola 1222:I found this book 974:They referred to 668: 667: 643:in most browsers. 621: 620: 617: 616: 613: 612: 564:WikiProject Craft 528: 527: 524: 523: 475:WikiProject China 423: 422: 419: 418: 334: 333: 330: 329: 291:Technology portal 250: 249: 246: 245: 161: 160: 157: 156: 2661: 2558: 2549: 2522: 2521: 2500: 2444: 2438: 2369: 2355: 2345: 2332: 2326: 2164: 2141: 2134: 2128: 2124: 2118: 1985: 1966: 1944: 1876: 1649: 1611: 1549: 1527: 1500: 1434:, the mixing of 1368: 1281: 1274: 1267: 1180: 1173: 1166: 944: 662:Reporting errors 654:has been deleted 630: 629: 623: 607:importance scale 589: 588: 585: 582: 579: 558: 551: 550: 545: 537: 530: 500: 499: 496: 493: 490: 469: 464: 463: 462: 453: 446: 445: 440: 432: 425: 395: 394: 391: 388: 385: 364: 357: 356: 351: 343: 336: 324: 323: 320: 317: 314: 293: 288: 287: 277: 270: 269: 259: 252: 222: 221: 218: 215: 212: 191: 184: 183: 178: 170: 163: 133: 132: 129: 126: 123: 92: 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2669: 2668: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2564: 2563: 2552: 2547: 2515: 2508:have permission 2498: 2472:this simple FaQ 2457: 2442: 2436: 2330: 2324: 2315: 2178: 2173: 2160: 2136: 2132: 2126: 2120: 2114: 1981: 1940: 1930: 1890: 1885: 1872: 1645: 1607: 1597: 1575: 1528: 1523: 1483: 1469: 1338: 1318: 1293:De Re Metallica 1277: 1270: 1263: 1176: 1169: 1162: 1157: 1100:microstructures 1059: 969:Wind Water Work 954: 942: 803: 781: 772: 753: 738: 702: 673: 664: 646: 645: 644: 627: 603:High-importance 586: 583: 580: 577: 576: 544:High‑importance 543: 514:High-importance 497: 494: 491: 488: 487: 465: 460: 458: 439:High‑importance 438: 392: 389: 386: 383: 382: 349: 321: 318: 315: 312: 311: 289: 282: 236:High-importance 219: 216: 213: 210: 209: 177:High‑importance 176: 147:High-importance 130: 127: 124: 121: 120: 88: 83: 81: 62:High‑importance 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 2667: 2665: 2657: 2656: 2651: 2646: 2641: 2636: 2631: 2626: 2621: 2616: 2611: 2606: 2601: 2596: 2591: 2586: 2581: 2576: 2566: 2565: 2542: 2541: 2534: 2487: 2486: 2478:Added archive 2456: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2415: 2414: 2399: 2391: 2319:MOS guidelines 2314: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2266: 2248:there are many 2177: 2174: 2172: 2171: 2157:requested move 2151: 2150: 2096: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2048: 2047: 1975: 1974: 1952: 1951: 1937:requested move 1931: 1929: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1883: 1869:requested move 1863: 1862: 1841: 1823: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1729: 1728: 1672: 1640: 1638: 1619: 1618: 1604:requested move 1598: 1596: 1593: 1574: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1468: 1467:Quranic Wisdom 1465: 1462: 1461: 1458: 1372: 1365: 1337: 1334: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1256: 1255: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1217: 1216: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1058: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1003: 1002: 972: 961: 953: 950: 935: 934: 906: 880: 854: 802: 796: 780: 777: 771: 768: 752: 749: 737: 734: 733: 732: 701: 698: 672: 669: 666: 665: 659: 658: 657: 641:case-sensitive 635: 634: 633: 631: 619: 618: 615: 614: 611: 610: 599: 593: 592: 590: 587:Craft articles 573:the discussion 559: 547: 546: 538: 526: 525: 522: 521: 510: 504: 503: 501: 484:the discussion 471: 470: 454: 442: 441: 433: 421: 420: 417: 416: 409:Low-importance 405: 399: 398: 396: 379:the discussion 365: 353: 352: 350:Low‑importance 344: 332: 331: 328: 327: 325: 308:the discussion 295: 294: 278: 266: 265: 260: 248: 247: 244: 243: 232: 226: 225: 223: 206:the discussion 192: 180: 179: 171: 159: 158: 155: 154: 143: 137: 136: 134: 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2666: 2655: 2652: 2650: 2647: 2645: 2642: 2640: 2637: 2635: 2632: 2630: 2627: 2625: 2622: 2620: 2617: 2615: 2612: 2610: 2607: 2605: 2602: 2600: 2597: 2595: 2592: 2590: 2587: 2585: 2582: 2580: 2577: 2575: 2572: 2571: 2569: 2562: 2561: 2556: 2551: 2550: 2539: 2535: 2532: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2519: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2495: 2490: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2460: 2454: 2448: 2445: 2440: 2439: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2423:Meteoric iron 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2368: 2363: 2359: 2354: 2349: 2344: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2333: 2328: 2327: 2320: 2312: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2287: 2286: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2267: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2183:Bob Burkhardt 2175: 2170: 2168: 2163: 2158: 2153: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2140: 2131: 2130:Split section 2123: 2117: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2097: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2013: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1990: 1987: 1984: 1979: 1973: 1972: 1969: 1963: 1961: 1957: 1950: 1948: 1943: 1938: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1911:Peterkingiron 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1887: 1882: 1880: 1875: 1870: 1865: 1864: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1842: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1831:Peterkingiron 1828: 1824: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1813:76.65.131.248 1810: 1806: 1803: 1800: 1799: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1766:76.65.131.248 1763: 1762:blacksmithing 1759: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718:Peterkingiron 1715: 1711: 1707: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1682: 1678: 1675:titled page, 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1657: 1653: 1648: 1643: 1637: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1617: 1615: 1610: 1605: 1600: 1599: 1594: 1592: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1559:Peterkingiron 1556: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1507:Peterkingiron 1503: 1502: 1501: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1490:85.99.188.180 1487: 1479: 1477: 1472: 1466: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1376:Imperial Rome 1373: 1369: 1366: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1348: 1343: 1335: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1323:75.145.136.37 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1285: 1282: 1280: 1275: 1273: 1268: 1266: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1202: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1185: 1184: 1181: 1179: 1174: 1172: 1167: 1165: 1154: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137:Peterkingiron 1133: 1132: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1104:Peterkingiron 1101: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1068: 1064: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043:Peterkingiron 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1001: 997: 993: 992:Peterkingiron 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 970: 966: 962: 959: 958: 957: 952:Islamic world 951: 949: 948: 945: 940: 932: 928: 925: 921: 920: 915: 911: 907: 904: 900: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 878: 874: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 852: 848: 845: 841: 837: 833: 829: 828: 827: 826: 822: 820: 816: 812: 808: 801: 797: 795: 794: 791: 790:Peterkingiron 787: 778: 776: 769: 767: 763: 760: 756: 750: 748: 747: 744: 743:Peterkingiron 735: 731: 728: 727:Peterkingiron 724: 723: 722: 721: 718: 714: 710: 705: 699: 697: 696: 693: 692:Peterkingiron 689: 684: 682: 678: 670: 663: 655: 651: 650: 649: 642: 638: 632: 625: 624: 608: 604: 598: 595: 594: 591: 574: 570: 566: 565: 560: 557: 553: 552: 548: 542: 539: 536: 532: 519: 515: 509: 506: 505: 502: 485: 481: 477: 476: 468: 457: 455: 452: 448: 447: 443: 437: 434: 431: 427: 414: 410: 404: 401: 400: 397: 380: 376: 372: 371: 366: 363: 359: 358: 354: 348: 345: 342: 338: 326: 309: 305: 301: 300: 292: 286: 281: 279: 276: 272: 271: 267: 264: 261: 258: 254: 241: 237: 231: 228: 227: 224: 207: 203: 199: 198: 193: 190: 186: 185: 181: 175: 172: 169: 165: 152: 148: 142: 139: 138: 135: 118: 117: 112: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2546: 2543: 2518:source check 2497: 2491: 2488: 2461: 2458: 2435: 2404:Andy Dingley 2394: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2361: 2323: 2316: 2313:Commons link 2283: 2271:Andy Dingley 2234:Andy Dingley 2206:Andy Dingley 2201: 2179: 2161: 2154: 2098: 2081: 2067:Andy Dingley 2062: 2031: 2018:Andy Dingley 2014: 2009: 1993: 1991: 1988: 1976: 1956:No consensus 1955: 1953: 1941: 1934: 1891: 1873: 1866: 1852:Andy Dingley 1843: 1808: 1801: 1781:Morgan Riley 1690:Morgan Riley 1673: 1639: 1622: 1620: 1608: 1601: 1580: 1576: 1554: 1529:— Preceding 1524: 1480: 1475: 1473: 1470: 1412:distillation 1408:calcinations 1364: 1353:Jorge Stolfi 1345: 1339: 1319: 1278: 1271: 1264: 1187: 1186: 1177: 1170: 1163: 1158: 1099: 1073: 1062: 1060: 1024: 1004: 984:wrought iron 976:finery forge 968: 964: 955: 936: 917: 891: 865: 839: 824: 823: 818: 804: 782: 773: 764: 761: 757: 754: 739: 712: 708: 706: 703: 685: 674: 647: 639:Anchors are 636: 602: 562: 513: 473: 467:China portal 408: 368: 297: 235: 211:Metalworking 202:Metalworking 195: 174:Metalworking 146: 114: 107:project page 96: 40:WikiProjects 2421:links from 2285:Ferrocerium 2167:move review 1947:move review 1879:move review 1758:ironmongery 1677:steelmaking 1614:move review 1582:AutumnWoods 1484:—Preceding 1416:sublimation 1342:Will Durant 1295:written by 1201:Mesopotamia 832:Trip hammer 2568:Categories 2555:Report bug 2388:contradict 2376:In general 2289:MartinezMD 2252:MartinezMD 2220:MartinezMD 2010:historical 1960:Cúchullain 1958:to move. 1925:Rename to 1686:ironmaking 1647:Ironmaking 1535:Mwenemucii 1436:anesthetic 1380:industries 1190:WP:REFDESK 1081:8773043087 1070:3540209638 313:Technology 304:technology 263:Technology 111:discussion 2538:this tool 2531:this tool 2380:generally 2198:zinc pest 2086:bobrayner 1627:DrKiernan 1451:compounds 1440:soporific 1394:-making, 939:AnomieBOT 910:Al-Jazari 858:Watermill 384:Chemistry 375:chemistry 347:Chemistry 2544:Cheers.— 2431:Iron Age 2427:Smelting 2398:section. 1895:Urselius 1543:contribs 1531:unsigned 1486:unsigned 1444:metallic 1430:without 1424:fixation 1420:steaming 1302:Lboscher 1272:Seeker 4 1171:Seeker 4 980:pig iron 786:bloomery 717:Darentig 2468:my edit 2437:Reatlas 2325:Reatlas 2200:), are 2111:spinout 2082:Support 2063:history 1994:history 1388:tanning 1204:this.-- 1057:sources 1041:West. 736:Needham 605:on the 516:on the 411:on the 238:on the 149:on the 30:B-class 2443:(talk) 2331:(talk) 2204:less. 2099:Oppose 2032:Oppose 1802:Prefer 1764:? -- 1654:using 1555:Object 1455:alloys 1404:Hindus 1400:cement 1384:dyeing 1245:StuRat 1227:Gilisa 1206:Gilisa 1122:J8079s 1085:J8079s 1027:J8079s 671:Source 36:scale. 2139:Trevj 2103:WP:SS 2002:WP:VA 1779:iron. 1714:WP:RM 1447:salts 1428:light 1396:glass 988:WP:OR 908:From 882:From 856:From 830:From 700:Query 681:steel 578:Craft 569:craft 541:Craft 489:China 480:China 436:China 2408:talk 2395:last 2293:talk 2275:talk 2256:talk 2238:talk 2224:talk 2210:talk 2202:much 2187:talk 2144:talk 2101:per 2090:talk 2071:talk 2057:and 2041:talk 2022:talk 2006:iron 1915:talk 1899:talk 1856:talk 1844:keep 1835:talk 1817:talk 1785:talk 1770:talk 1760:and 1740:talk 1722:talk 1694:talk 1665:talk 1631:talk 1586:talk 1563:talk 1539:talk 1511:talk 1494:talk 1453:and 1438:and 1432:heat 1398:and 1392:soap 1357:talk 1327:talk 1306:talk 1279:Talk 1249:talk 1231:talk 1210:talk 1193:here 1178:Talk 1141:talk 1126:talk 1108:talk 1089:talk 1078:ISBN 1067:ISBN 1047:talk 1031:talk 996:talk 819:this 709:from 688:iron 679:and 677:iron 637:Tip: 597:High 508:High 230:High 141:High 2512:RfC 2482:to 2159:. 2137:-- 2113:to 2037:BDD 1871:. 1846:at 1736:PBS 1716:. 1661:PBS 1382:as 1265:The 1164:The 1018:--> 1014:--> 1012:--> 990:. 982:to 924:cf. 896:cf. 870:cf. 844:cf. 788:. 403:Low 2570:: 2525:. 2520:}} 2516:{{ 2429:, 2425:, 2410:) 2364:: 2295:) 2277:) 2258:) 2250:. 2240:) 2226:) 2212:) 2189:) 2146:) 2133:}} 2127:{{ 2092:) 2073:) 2043:) 2035:-- 2024:) 1986:– 1980:→ 1939:. 1917:) 1901:) 1858:) 1837:) 1819:) 1787:) 1772:) 1742:) 1724:) 1696:) 1667:) 1644:→ 1633:) 1606:. 1588:) 1565:) 1545:) 1541:• 1513:) 1496:) 1460:” 1449:, 1422:, 1418:, 1414:, 1410:, 1390:, 1386:, 1371:“ 1359:) 1344:, 1329:) 1308:) 1251:) 1233:) 1212:) 1143:) 1128:) 1110:) 1091:) 1049:) 1033:) 998:) 929:, 912:: 901:, 886:: 875:, 860:: 849:, 834:: 713:to 2557:) 2553:( 2540:. 2533:. 2406:( 2291:( 2273:( 2254:( 2236:( 2222:( 2208:( 2185:( 2142:( 2088:( 2069:( 2039:( 2020:( 1967:c 1964:/ 1913:( 1897:( 1854:( 1833:( 1815:( 1783:( 1768:( 1738:( 1720:( 1692:( 1663:( 1629:( 1584:( 1561:( 1537:( 1509:( 1492:( 1355:( 1325:( 1304:( 1247:( 1229:( 1208:( 1139:( 1124:( 1106:( 1087:( 1045:( 1029:( 994:( 943:⚡ 933:) 905:) 879:) 853:) 656:. 609:. 520:. 415:. 242:. 153:. 119:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
History of Science
WikiProject icon
History of science portal
History of Science WikiProject
history of science
project page
discussion
History of Science Collaboration of the Month
High
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Metalworking
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Metalworking
Metalworking
the discussion
High
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Technology
WikiProject icon
icon
Technology portal
WikiProject Technology
technology
the discussion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑