Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:First Anglo-Maratha War

Source đź“ť

1084:
Deccan would have entailed. Moreover, both Mahadji and Nana faced acute financial distress. Under these circumstances, peace at the most favorable terms was the only course left open. After prolonged negotiations a treaty was signed between Mahadji and Anderson on 17th May, 1782. It was known as the Treaty of Salbai, after a small village of the same name where Mahadji was in camp." M. S. Narvane further quotes that, "The main clauses of the treaty were as follows: All territories captured by the Company would be returned, including Bassein but excluding Salsette and some small islands near Bombay. These would remain with the British. Territories in Gujarat would be returned to the Peshwa and Gaikwad, Bhadoch being given to Mahadji for services rendered. Raghoba was to be handed over to the Marathas. He would spend the remainder of his life at a secluded spot in Maharashtra on a pension of Rs. 25,000 per month. Thus ended the First Anglo-Maratha war. Politically the Company was a slight gainer. They retained Salsette whereas the Marathas got back only what they had lost earlier. The main gain from the Maratha point of view was the elimination of the threat posed by Raghoba." Raghoba is Raghunath Rao.
1163:
states that "Politically the Company was a slight gainer. They retained Salsette whereas the Marathas got back only what they had lost earlier. The main gain from the Maratha point of view was the elimination of the threat posed by Raghoba." I do not see in any of the citations where multiple authors have claimed that Marathas were victors. Can you point exact quote from the citations on the article which claims the end result of Maratha as victors 1782? I didn't see any, otherwise there would have been no question or debate but clearly there aren't any on the article that states so. Multiple article states that the end result was the treaty where Marathas were given back some territories whereas the British retained some and there was peace among both for next 20 yrs where both allied with each other during campaigns against Mysore.
1068:
the Treaty of Wadgaon and sent troops from Calcutta all the way across central India to strengthen the Bombay forces. One by one they captured Maratha cities. In May 1782 a new treaty was signed with the Marathas, the Treaty of Salbai. Although it merely restored the status quo ante bellum, this treaty gave the British twenty years of peace with the Marathas and permitted them to concentrate their efforts against the French and the forces of Mysore." And James C. Bradford. International Encyclopedia of Military History. Routledge. p. 867. "The company renounced the first draft of the treaty of Wadgaon, fighting on until 1782, and, despite its capture of the fortress of Gwalior (1780), the only concession that the British could win was the cession of Salsette Island , which improved the security of Bombay."
475: 1218:"Hastings promptly repudiated the Treaty of Wadgaon and sent troops from Calcutta all the way across central India to strengthen the Bombay forces. One by one they captured Maratha cities. In May 1782 a new treaty was signed with the Marathas, the Treaty of Salbai. Although it merely restored the status quo ante bellum, this treaty gave the British twenty years of peace with the Marathas and permitted them to concentrate their efforts against the French and the forces of Mysore. 459: 200: 224: 77: 176: 22: 344: 248: 98: 53: 84: 108: 416: 405: 383: 302: 274: 394: 372: 1186:"A series of skirmishes followed in which the Marathas thoroughly defeated the British. Finally, under severe pressure from London, the British sought peace. A new treaty, the Treaty of Salbai, was signed on 17 May 1782. It force the British to return territory they had gained after the Treaty of Purandhar. 1253:
All sources in majority mention the treaty but none specifically consider one or the other as victors either but do state that British politically gained from the treaty. So considering the sources in regards to the treaty, it is disputed if compared with Barua's. If there are other reliable sources
1121:
how can you even concluded Phyrric victory or victory at all? Haven't you read what has been quotes by the reliable citations? And what is with the language? You are here for discussion and not force your opinion. There is no policy that what has been there on the article, cannot be corrected. False
762:
Sorry! I wasn't looking at it as a reversion of someone's move but more as a move from endash to hyphen. Such move requests are listed on various notice boards of interested WikiProjects thereby highlighting this discussion to the members. If the move is actually just technical where the redirect of
507:
I've just tried making a few basic corrections to this article, but I'm not an Indian history specialist, and I'm really struggling with the sources available online. Most of the war is simply missing from this article, and I don't feel confident enough to fill in all the missing bits myself (though
1067:
According to reliable citations, the battle resulted with treaty of Salbai. Here are some quotes from reliable sources: From Richard Ernest Dupuy, Gay M. Hammerman, Grace P. Hayes (1977). The American Revolution: A Global War. David McKay Company, Incorporated. p. 247. "Hastings promptly repudiated
834:
as the first source you have linked is currently used to support "Maratha victory" in the infobox, but clearly this is contradictory to the actual text in the book itself. A second quote from the book: "Both these modes of warfare proved useless in bringing about a decisive result in the War", ergo
1162:
Due to age, Henry Beveridge book is an unreliable source which was published in 1862 and likely a primary source. Secondary sources are preferred. How is the treaty of Salbai victory for either party? Giving away and retaining some of territories was part of the negotiation. M.S. Naravane clearly
1083:
M S Narvane in book "Battles of the Honourable East India Company: Making of the Raj", page 63 quotes that "Mudhoji was known to have taken bribe from Hastings and would not join a war. Mahadji, himself was anxious that his forces were not divided and separated, which war both in Malwa and in the
1147:
wrote then: "First the disgraceful convention of Wargaum , next the humiliating treaty of Purandhar , and lastly the equally humiliating treaty of Salbai , by which the Bombay presidency was not only deprived of the only remnant of conquest which the treaty of Purandhar had left, but stripped of
1215:
I am looking at multiple sources ON the article and all of them are secondary sources, so not sure where you got the idea that I am engaging in primary source. You were and that is why I mentioned that you should be following secondary sources. Restoration of Maratha territories were part of
928:, quote: "Inspite of British superiority in the military science, the British troops could not force a decisive win over the Maratha troops in the First Anglo-Maratha War. The ultimate result of the War showed that the two sides remained evenly balanced.", p. 226, 763:
endash would anyways be left behind for simplicity, i did not see any point in inviting numerous editors here. Had the move been requested to say "First war between British and Marathas" then it would have been appropriate for some discussion. §§
482: 288: 1177:
I cited Henry Beveridge because you are engaging in original research by claiming that there were no victors or losers, when in fact British authors even that time treated it as a defeat. What Beveridge said isn't wrong anyway, see
466: 284: 1216:
negotiation of the treaty. Source you provided by Pradeep Barua is good but then comes in conflict with other sources on the article such as M.S Navarane and Richard Ernest Dupuy, Gay M. Hammerman, Grace P. Hayes who quote that
814:. Even the main painting of a British soldier allegedly submitting to the Marathas is unsourced and does not appear to have a historical basis. I would like additional involvement from other users in regards to this matter. 998: 810:. This claim of an indecisive outcome is proven by a variety of academic sources, including the following . I think that attempts to try and portray this war as a "Maratha Victory" is indicative of a bias, which violates 640:, but Jprg1966 mistakenly thought they should be move to en dash. We have enough anti-en-dash sentiment around without this additional level of mistake aggravating things, so these should be rolled back. 835:
the outcome of the war was indecisive. The first source used in the infobox does not have a free preview on Google Books, but searching the book for "Maratha victory" does not bring up anything relevant.
1363: 736:
A request to make half-hundred of moves to implement a guideline could be technical. A request to revert mass moves of a user, who is ignorant about a guideline, is not technical, if only because
76: 1343: 1254:
that support Barua's statement then undeniably, the result is disputed if compared with citations on the article. Therefore, result mentioning either Disputed or the Treaty is more relevant.
1398: 1403: 1029:, the sources claiming that the war resulted in an indecisive conclusion is sound as proven by the above sources. What is your justification for claiming it was a Maratha victory? 1328: 1049: 1388: 1242:
Changing goalposts won't do anything. Sources are not disputing each other because none say that British won this war. They either only mention the treaty or say Marathas won.
357: 314: 1393: 1358: 1106:, we no longer use the terms "Decisive", "tactical" and "pyrrhic". We only use "Victory". Now stop edit warring against what exists on infobox for many years and read 214: 343: 713: 1383: 1373: 1368: 1353: 1338: 190: 636:
Never mind, your link is a good list. Note to closer: the problem is that the combining forms like Anglo- and Franco- use hyphen, as the MOS points out in
1348: 1333: 841: 309: 279: 166: 209: 67: 1323: 474: 156: 529: 318: 774: 727: 233: 185: 63: 1122:
quotes and unreliable citations have been used that needs to be fixed. The result clearly was treaty of Salbai with no victors or losers.
1378: 1318: 699: 508:
I seem by accident to be half-way to writing a new article on the Battle of Wadgaon, which I may try to complete in the next few days).
1197: 1192:
Your argument is, that you have found a few sources which are not mentioning the victor. You can find many sources for other wars like
1103: 1007: 982: 957: 932: 737: 1053: 860: 522:
The War was inconclusive.However it has been wrongly given as a British defeat.I will edit the article with proper refernces.
33: 131: 121: 58: 1139:
How the treaty of Salbai was not a defeat when the British had to surrender all the territories that they had gained since
1144: 596:) by hands, but there are several dozen to fix. Since many redirects were touched (due to a MediaWiki glitch) after these 792:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
578: 557:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1140: 683: 770: 723: 533: 39: 21: 1268:
One more thing, there is no rule as using only 25 words for "quote=parameter". An admin already confirmed it.
703: 1193: 582: 513: 313:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 848: 525: 1184:
If you are looking for just one source and ignoring all that already exist on the article then see this:
745: 605: 568: 953:, quote: "First Anglo-Maratha War...The war ends inconclusively.", Columbia University Press, p. 290, 661:—it's a fiddly rule, but I found it easy to take on board. On a deeper level, it makes perfect sense. 1244: 1206: 1180:"restoration of all Maratha territories occupied by the British since the treaty of Purandhar (1776)" 1153: 1112: 1034: 819: 764: 717: 1273: 1259: 1225: 1168: 1127: 1089: 1073: 899: 856: 645: 623: 509: 1204:, etc. where sources don't mention a victor but it doesn't mean that the victor does not exist. 973: 597: 1004: 979: 954: 929: 1188: 1179: 948: 923: 811: 883: 741: 601: 563: 458: 1151:
Multiple reliable sources are not wrong if they are saying that Marathas were the victors.
1107: 199: 1030: 1026: 815: 669: 223: 237:, to create and add a map to this article. Once the requested map is added, remove the 1312: 1269: 1255: 1221: 1164: 1123: 1085: 1069: 895: 852: 641: 619: 593: 1277: 1263: 1248: 1229: 1210: 1172: 1157: 1131: 1116: 1093: 1077: 1057: 1038: 903: 887: 864: 823: 778: 749: 731: 707: 674: 649: 627: 609: 573: 537: 517: 175: 113: 1149: 1148:
almost all its older possessions and nearly confined within its original island."
879: 686:(full names of both "parties"), which use an en-dash, and combining forms like 1201: 662: 637: 103: 618:– but it will be easier to get an admin to fix them if you can list them. 247: 97: 52: 975:
The First Anglo-Maratha War, 1774-1783: A Military Study of Major Battles
925:
The First Anglo-Maratha War, 1774-1783: A Military Study of Major Battles
894:
Which sources? The ones linked here all support an inconclusive result.
83: 1098:
At p.64 it say "Forcing the enemy to retreat was, at best, a pyrrhic
129:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 803:
I believe that it is well sourced that the outcome of this war was
301: 273: 126: 788:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.
15: 473: 457: 342: 246: 222: 198: 174: 1136:
I am reading the same source (Narvane) who I had quoted.
1000:
Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania: M to Z
808: 589: 1364:
Start-Class Indian history articles of High-importance
551:
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal.
125:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 1220:
Therefore, the result can then be called "Disputed".
799:
Request for Comment - Indecisive or Maratha victory?
355:
This article has been checked against the following
600:moves, a user with sysop can do it faster than me. 440: 354: 1344:Start-Class Maharashtra articles of Mid-importance 950:Columbia Chronologies of Asian History and Culture 714:Knowledge (XXG):Requested moves/Technical requests 1399:Start-Class South Asian military history articles 1048:The war that ended with the treaty of salbai was 1404:South Asian military history task force articles 231:This article needs a map. Please work with the 682:, obviously: Jprg1966 is confusing cases like 8: 1329:Start-Class India articles of Mid-importance 807:and not a "Maratha Victory" as claimed here 327:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 1389:Start-Class Asian military history articles 19: 1394:Asian military history task force articles 437: 351: 268: 47: 842:RfC questions should be written neutrally 562:The result of the proposal was moved. -- 307:This article is within the scope of the 1374:Knowledge (XXG) requested maps in India 1359:High-importance Indian history articles 914: 483:South Asian military history task force 270: 49: 1217: 1185: 590:Jprg1966’s page moves since December 7 317:. To use this banner, please see the 1384:Start-Class military history articles 698:, etc.), which always take a hyphen. 330:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 592:? I fixed several of these (such as 119:This article is within the scope of 1369:WikiProject Indian history articles 1354:Start-Class Indian history articles 1339:Mid-importance Maharashtra articles 878:- Maratha victory per the sources. 38:It is of interest to the following 1104:Template:Infobox military conflict 255:This article was last assessed in 14: 712:Why wasnt this request posted at 467:Asian military history task force 141:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 1349:WikiProject Maharashtra articles 1334:Start-Class Maharashtra articles 1063:Battle result - Treaty of Salbai 414: 403: 392: 381: 370: 300: 272: 106: 96: 82: 75: 51: 20: 1050:2405:204:538C:BE9E:0:0:525:78B0 161:This article has been rated as 1022:Indecisive or Maratha victory? 1: 1324:Mid-importance India articles 1039:02:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC) 865:21:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC) 207:This article is supported by 183:This article is supported by 1058:17:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC) 824:06:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC) 779:04:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 574:14:19, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 518:22:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 310:Military history WikiProject 210:the Indian history workgroup 750:15:10, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 732:11:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 708:10:34, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 675:00:02, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 650:05:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 628:05:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 610:19:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 1420: 1379:WikiProject India articles 1319:Start-Class India articles 947:John Bowman (2000-09-05), 904:16:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC) 888:16:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC) 585:– Can somebody extinguish 538:14:54, 21 April 2014 (UTC) 503:A very problematic article 375:Referencing and citation: 167:project's importance scale 144:Template:WikiProject India 997:West, Barbara A. (2009). 481: 465: 436: 333:military history articles 295: 254: 230: 206: 182: 160: 91: 46: 1278:19:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1264:19:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1249:19:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1230:17:14, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1211:16:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1173:15:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1158:15:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1132:14:59, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1117:14:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1094:13:59, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1078:13:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 790:Please do not modify it. 554:Please do not modify it. 1194:Second Anglo-Afghan War 738:WP:consensus can change 583:First Anglo-Maratha War 579:First Anglo–Maratha War 441:Associated task forces: 386:Coverage and accuracy: 186:WikiProject Maharashtra 478: 462: 419:Supporting materials: 347: 251: 227: 203: 179: 28:This article is rated 972:M. R. Kantak (1993), 922:M. R. Kantak (1993), 477: 461: 346: 250: 226: 202: 178: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 684:Mexican–American War 1141:Treaty of Purandhar 408:Grammar and style: 361:for B-class status: 840:Also a side note, 479: 463: 348: 315:list of open tasks 252: 228: 204: 180: 34:content assessment 868: 851:comment added by 572: 528:comment added by 500: 499: 496: 495: 492: 491: 488: 487: 432: 431: 399:criterion not met 377:criterion not met 319:full instructions 267: 266: 263: 262: 122:WikiProject India 1411: 1014: 1013: 994: 988: 987: 969: 963: 962: 944: 938: 937: 919: 867: 845: 767: 720: 672: 667: 566: 556: 540: 448: 438: 422: 418: 417: 411: 407: 406: 400: 396: 395: 389: 385: 384: 378: 374: 373: 352: 335: 334: 331: 328: 325: 324:Military history 304: 297: 296: 291: 280:Military history 276: 269: 240: 149: 148: 145: 142: 139: 116: 111: 110: 109: 100: 93: 92: 87: 86: 85: 80: 79: 78: 73: 70: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1309: 1308: 1245:Aman Kumar Goel 1207:Aman Kumar Goel 1198:Afghanistan war 1154:Aman Kumar Goel 1145:Henry Beveridge 1113:Aman Kumar Goel 1065: 1046: 1027:user:Capitals00 1024: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1010: 996: 995: 991: 985: 971: 970: 966: 960: 946: 945: 941: 935: 921: 920: 916: 846: 801: 796: 765: 718: 670: 663: 552: 546: 530:117.194.231.236 523: 505: 446: 420: 415: 409: 404: 398: 393: 387: 382: 376: 371: 332: 329: 326: 323: 322: 282: 238: 215:High-importance 146: 143: 140: 137: 136: 112: 107: 105: 81: 74: 71: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 1417: 1415: 1407: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1356: 1351: 1346: 1341: 1336: 1331: 1326: 1321: 1311: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1190: 1182: 1137: 1064: 1061: 1045: 1044:Social science 1042: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1008: 989: 983: 964: 958: 939: 933: 913: 912: 908: 907: 906: 891: 890: 872: 871: 870: 869: 837: 836: 800: 797: 795: 794: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 766:Dharmadhyaksha 755: 754: 753: 752: 719:Dharmadhyaksha 710: 677: 655: 654: 653: 652: 631: 630: 560: 559: 547: 545: 544:Requested move 542: 504: 501: 498: 497: 494: 493: 490: 489: 486: 485: 480: 470: 469: 464: 454: 453: 451: 449: 443: 442: 434: 433: 430: 429: 427: 425: 424: 423: 412: 401: 390: 379: 365: 364: 362: 349: 339: 338: 336: 305: 293: 292: 277: 265: 264: 261: 260: 253: 243: 242: 234:Maps workgroup 229: 219: 218: 205: 195: 194: 191:Mid-importance 181: 171: 170: 163:Mid-importance 159: 153: 152: 150: 147:India articles 118: 117: 101: 89: 88: 72:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1416: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1382: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1345: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1335: 1332: 1330: 1327: 1325: 1322: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1314: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1189: 1187: 1183: 1181: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1156: 1155: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1109: 1105: 1102:" but as per 1101: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1062: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1043: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1021: 1011: 1009:9780816071098 1006: 1002: 1001: 993: 990: 986: 984:9788171546961 981: 977: 976: 968: 965: 961: 959:9780231500043 956: 952: 951: 943: 940: 936: 934:9788171546961 931: 927: 926: 918: 915: 911: 905: 901: 897: 893: 892: 889: 885: 881: 877: 874: 873: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 843: 839: 838: 833: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 806: 798: 793: 791: 786: 780: 776: 772: 768: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 734: 733: 729: 725: 721: 715: 711: 709: 705: 701: 700:71.198.40.152 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 678: 676: 673: 668: 666: 660: 657: 656: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 634: 633: 632: 629: 625: 621: 617: 614: 613: 612: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 594:Anglo-Aro War 591: 588: 584: 580: 576: 575: 570: 565: 558: 555: 549: 548: 543: 541: 539: 535: 531: 527: 520: 519: 515: 511: 510:David Trochos 502: 484: 476: 472: 471: 468: 460: 456: 455: 452: 450: 445: 444: 439: 435: 428: 426: 421:criterion met 413: 410:criterion met 402: 391: 388:criterion met 380: 369: 368: 367: 366: 363: 360: 359: 353: 350: 345: 341: 340: 337: 320: 316: 312: 311: 306: 303: 299: 298: 294: 290: 286: 281: 278: 275: 271: 258: 249: 245: 244: 236: 235: 225: 221: 220: 216: 213:(assessed as 212: 211: 201: 197: 196: 192: 189:(assessed as 188: 187: 177: 173: 172: 168: 164: 158: 155: 154: 151: 134: 133: 128: 124: 123: 115: 104: 102: 99: 95: 94: 90: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1243: 1205: 1152: 1111: 1099: 1066: 1047: 1025: 999: 992: 974: 967: 949: 942: 924: 917: 909: 875: 847:— Preceding 831: 804: 802: 789: 787: 695: 691: 687: 679: 664: 658: 615: 586: 577: 561: 553: 550: 524:— Preceding 521: 506: 356: 308: 257:January 2007 256: 232: 208: 184: 162: 132:project page 130: 120: 114:India portal 40:WikiProjects 742:Incnis Mrsi 602:Incnis Mrsi 564:regentspark 397:Structure: 64:Maharashtra 30:Start-class 1313:Categories 1202:Kargil war 1031:Xtremedood 978:, p. 220, 910:References 816:Xtremedood 805:indecisive 638:MOS:ENDASH 289:South Asia 241:parameter. 239:map-needed 853:‎Alcherin 598:incorrect 1270:MehmoodS 1256:MehmoodS 1222:MehmoodS 1165:MehmoodS 1124:MehmoodS 1086:MehmoodS 1070:MehmoodS 896:Alcherin 861:contribs 849:unsigned 696:Hiberno- 642:Dicklyon 620:Dicklyon 526:unsigned 358:criteria 1100:victory 832:Support 812:WP:NPOV 680:Support 671:(talk) 659:Support 616:Support 569:comment 165:on the 68:History 1108:WP:BRD 880:D4iNa4 876:oppose 688:Anglo- 36:scale. 692:Sino- 690:(cf. 285:Asian 138:India 127:India 59:India 1274:talk 1260:talk 1226:talk 1169:talk 1128:talk 1090:talk 1074:talk 1054:talk 1035:talk 1005:ISBN 980:ISBN 955:ISBN 930:ISBN 900:talk 884:talk 857:talk 820:talk 769:§§ { 746:talk 722:§§ { 716:? §§ 704:talk 665:Tony 646:talk 624:talk 606:talk 534:talk 514:talk 587:all 157:Mid 1315:: 1276:) 1262:) 1228:) 1200:, 1196:, 1171:) 1143:? 1130:) 1110:. 1092:) 1076:) 1056:) 1037:) 1003:. 902:) 886:) 863:) 859:• 844:. 822:) 777:} 748:) 740:. 730:} 706:) 694:, 648:) 626:) 608:) 581:→ 536:) 516:) 447:/ 287:/ 283:: 217:). 193:). 66:/ 62:: 1272:( 1258:( 1224:( 1167:( 1126:( 1088:( 1072:( 1052:( 1033:( 1012:. 898:( 882:( 855:( 818:( 775:C 773:/ 771:T 744:( 728:C 726:/ 724:T 702:( 644:( 622:( 604:( 571:) 567:( 532:( 512:( 321:. 259:. 169:. 135:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
India
Maharashtra
History
WikiProject icon
India portal
WikiProject India
India
project page
Mid
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Maharashtra
Mid-importance
Taskforce icon
the Indian history workgroup
High-importance
Note icon
Maps workgroup
Note icon
WikiProject icon
Military history
Asian
South Asia
WikiProject icon
Military history WikiProject
list of open tasks

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑