793:
the
British side, pointing out how they were beseiged, how they responded, and how they eventually lost, saying very little of the Boer side of the events that transpired. Maybe I just think so because I'm an Afrikaaner (Boer) and I learned the whole history with emphesis being placed only on the Boer side of the historical narrative. I think neither side should be more emphesised than teh other, and that a FULL and COMPLETE description of all teh events that transpired should be given. Just my two cents, but I know if I change it, Knowledge's new "less is more" policy will come cracking down and remove all my writing. Anyway, please don't just ignore my post because I'm an anon. I have great pride (and shame) in my country and the events that shaped it. I ask that in the same way that you would all tell every detail of your own country or people group's war for independece, so also give my coutry the same attention and detail. - Ouboet 03:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC) Ouboet
454:
1105:
Haggard who was accompanied by a small party. It was never a military conquest and could easily have been resisted by the Boers but it was not resisted because the Boers had requested the annexation. The subsequent “rebellion” and “war” needs to be seen against this background. The Boer attack on the
British was a despicable betrayal of the protection which the British had provided to the Boers in their time of need. I refer you to the South African historian and author Chris Ash. His books Kruger, kommandos and Kak, and Kruger’s War.
90:
144:
123:
525:
498:
21:
470:
535:
637:
154:
81:
323:
438:
395:
384:
373:
362:
601:
920:
describe something that is or has happened in the past. Again, clear indication of a very unbalanced article. This page needs a lot of work. It has been requiring citations since 2009. Anyway, my edits were reversed by an editor with the same usual reverence and respectful explanation as received on other pages from the same editor: POV. Not nice, not
263:
228:
689:
the 1st Boer War. The main hostilities of the Zulu War did not begin until after the Brit's ultimatum to the Zulus (in Dec. 1878?) & the
British invasion of Zulu territory in January 1879. Cetewayo (King) & the Zulus were decisively defeated at Ulundi in July 1879 & surrendered shortly thereafter (Sept. 1879, I think).
351:
919:
The opening paragraph gives a general overview of the
British intent, without balancing the POV with any discussion about the legitimacy of the ZAR state. Then it mentions the 1886 Gold rush in Transvaal. In an encyclopedic quality NEUTRAL point of view article one would not refer to future events to
792:
Quick question. Why does it seem the article is trying to say as much as possible in as little as possible. It doesn't mention the various factors in both the
British and the Boer side that led to the conflict, it only names what is considered the main one. Also, it seems that the article focuses on
688:
Revise & correct material on 1st Boer War: 1877 was not "after" the Anglo-Zulu war which was fought in 1879. Rather the annexation of the
Transvaal in 1877 increased tension between all 3 parties (the Brits, the Zulus & the Boers) & was a contributing cause of both the Anglo-Zulu War and
1104:
The article omits the real reason for the original annexation. The Boers requested that the ZAR be annexed by
Britain in order to provide protection for the Boers against an imminent Zulu invasion. The Zulus would not invade a British protectorate. The annexation was read out by the author Rider
796:
The following appears: "The
British also had three very important bases in Bombay, which drove them into Nepal." Given that the areas mentioned are in Asia (India/Nepal) not Africa and the discussion appears to be about Lesotho (Basotuland) this sentence is strange. Is there some cross reference
1061:
This is the plural in the old spelling of Dutch, which hasn't been used in South Africa for a century. The Dutch singular was 'laager', and since 1948 it has been 'lager'. In
Afrikaans it's 'laer'. I'd change this myself, but it's a link, and I'm afraid to damage
1025:
The section about the Zulu War is a long digression from what should be the article's main focus, the 1881 Anglo-Boer war. Mention of the Zulu War and whatever effect it had on the
Transvaal conflict could be simply folded into the "Background"
1124:
The weapons should not have such a place in an article about a war it feels like its forced in and does not feel natural space would be better spent on specific battles so we could see specifically how the Boers Commandos worked in real combat
477:
246:
884:
Removed the reference to the Second Boer War as "an attempt to annex the Transvaal and Orange Free State Republics" (paraphrasing), as this is clearly disingenuous, due to the fact the Second Boer War was nothing of the sort.
461:
445:
242:
238:
704:
this article is totally muddled in terms of style, grammar and chronology and obviously cobbled together from other articles on south african wars of the 19th century. To be completely rewritten by a competent historian.
1002:
The article its in the crosshairs of Pro-British Empire nostalgics and some Extreme Pro Boer editors. Checking out neutrality. Also someone omited to include it on the Scramble for Afrika template. Fixed.
789:
The comment concerning the Boers adoption of breech loading rifles as an advantage doesn't seem to make sense since the British were armed with breech loading rifles as well (the Martini-Henry)
699:
Dates at start of article need to be fixed, they currently state "...was fought from 16 December 2006 until 23 March 2007..." 02:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)02:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)~~
1228:
610:
508:
1218:
1208:
1243:
1173:
1148:
1248:
1223:
838:
During the First Boer War (1880-1881), the British wore either red or blue uniforms. Only in the Second Boer War (1899-1902) did the British start wearing the khaki uniform.
1213:
1203:
985:. The changes have been reverted with an explanation in the same section. Clearly more editor input there would help decide whether or not the change is appropriate. --
336:
313:
275:
1188:
200:
210:
1238:
1178:
581:
1193:
591:
322:
1183:
1163:
1168:
935:
in order for us to work together to improve the quality and neutrality of this page. Then, was this last edit vandalism? The words are not yet completed?
1253:
1233:
1198:
303:
1258:
1158:
176:
823:
In the article it says that the British soldiers wore red and blue. Is this correct? I thought that by this point the British were wearing khaki.
94:
557:
270:
233:
781:
279:
1063:
892:
804:
167:
128:
1153:
1106:
931:
I can go on, but seriously, this needs a complete re-write, so should probably start with the 1877 annexation. Please explain your POV
865:
548:
503:
753:
where the text in this article was removed. So if you wish to see edits to this article before today please see the history of the
911:
This article slants heavily British POV and then heavily Boer POV, it is not NPOV, all around and is of very low quality.
103:
58:
1082:
828:
757:
62:
1067:
777:
896:
808:
453:
80:
1110:
869:
824:
274:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1130:
773:
710:
159:
109:
694:
also maybe add name of writers who contributed to the propaganda and how the people felt about the war?
706:
1126:
1090:
1008:
932:
888:
861:
800:
769:
641:
839:
843:
540:
66:
556:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
175:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
940:
1046:
1031:
143:
122:
20:
1086:
1004:
971:
963:
921:
750:
29:
925:
645:
469:
172:
1142:
990:
982:
936:
524:
497:
1041:
Since there have been no objections, I have removed the section about the Zulu War.
858:
This page has some serious blocks of text. Break 'em up. Makes it hard to read.
553:
1081:
The numbers of men involved in the action are different in this section vs. the
1042:
1027:
924:
and not explaining why, in his POV, my edits are POV. Certainly the page is not
734:
530:
149:
959:
437:
57:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
986:
955:
746:
797:
intended or is it perhaps just an overlooked bit from a cut and paste?
1134:
1114:
1094:
1071:
1050:
1035:
1012:
994:
944:
900:
873:
847:
832:
812:
760:
600:
262:
227:
765:
There is so much more to this war than that short little article.
627:
74:
15:
599:
468:
452:
436:
321:
928:
and certainly this type of editing is not very productive.
962:(which is currently a very poor article) to redirect to
975:
967:
737:-- 16:50, 12 October 2004 Tempshill (set up todo list)
683:
Write material on "aftermath" or "lasting consequences"
669:
663:
657:
651:
552:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
334:
This article has been checked against the following
171:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
958:is a redirct. Yesterday I altered to redirect from
419:
333:
749:article, before that article was moved to the
1229:European military history task force articles
745:The text in this article was copied from the
8:
1219:British military history task force articles
1209:African military history task force articles
1244:Start-Class South African politics articles
1174:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in History
1149:Knowledge articles that use British English
78:
1249:South African politics task force articles
1224:C-Class European military history articles
492:
416:
330:
222:
117:
33:, which has its own spelling conventions (
1214:C-Class British military history articles
1204:C-Class African military history articles
268:This article is within the scope of the
1189:High-importance British Empire articles
494:
224:
119:
288:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
278:. To use this banner, please see the
1239:High-importance South Africa articles
1179:Start-Class vital articles in History
611:the South African politics task force
291:Template:WikiProject Military history
65:, this should not be changed without
7:
1194:All WikiProject British Empire pages
546:This article is within the scope of
478:European military history task force
185:Knowledge:WikiProject British Empire
165:This article is within the scope of
1184:Start-Class British Empire articles
1164:Knowledge vital articles in History
462:British military history task force
446:African military history task force
188:Template:WikiProject British Empire
108:It is of interest to the following
1169:Start-Class level-5 vital articles
566:Knowledge:WikiProject South Africa
14:
1254:WikiProject South Africa articles
1234:Start-Class South Africa articles
1199:C-Class military history articles
1120:Remove the part about Boer rifles
1021:Zulu War section could be removed
569:Template:WikiProject South Africa
1259:Knowledge pages with to-do lists
1159:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
635:
533:
523:
496:
393:
382:
371:
360:
349:
261:
226:
152:
142:
121:
88:
79:
19:
586:This article has been rated as
308:This article has been rated as
205:This article has been rated as
995:18:46, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
945:10:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
1:
1051:03:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
1036:02:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
901:14:54, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
848:01:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
784:) 09:04, March 31, 2006 (UTC)
713:) 10:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
608:This article is supported by
560:and see a list of open tasks.
179:and see a list of open tasks.
761:18:19, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
271:Military history WikiProject
874:20:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
1275:
1154:Start-Class vital articles
1115:01:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
1095:20:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
1077:Action at Bronkhorstspruit
981:I explain my reasoning on
970:) and added a hatnote to
813:02:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
592:project's importance scale
354:Referencing and citation:
211:project's importance scale
168:WikiProject British Empire
1072:19:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
1013:21:29, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
607:
585:
518:
476:
460:
444:
415:
307:
294:military history articles
256:
204:
137:
116:
1135:01:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
833:14:48, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
549:WikiProject South Africa
420:Associated task forces:
365:Coverage and accuracy:
191:British Empire articles
983:Talk:Boer War#Redirect
604:
473:
457:
441:
398:Supporting materials:
326:
603:
572:South Africa articles
472:
456:
440:
325:
160:British Empire portal
95:level-5 vital article
933:User:Mean_as_custard
758:Philip Baird Shearer
63:relevant style guide
59:varieties of English
915:The 1877 Annexation
541:South Africa portal
387:Grammar and style:
340:for B-class status:
61:. According to the
954:The article title
675:Updated 2022-12-09
605:
474:
458:
442:
327:
276:list of open tasks
104:content assessment
891:comment added by
864:comment added by
825:TreeWithAChainsaw
815:
803:comment added by
786:
772:comment added by
721:
720:
626:
625:
622:
621:
618:
617:
491:
490:
487:
486:
483:
482:
411:
410:
356:criterion not met
312:on the project's
280:full instructions
221:
220:
217:
216:
73:
72:
1266:
903:
876:
798:
785:
766:
676:
639:
638:
628:
574:
573:
570:
567:
564:
543:
538:
537:
536:
527:
520:
519:
514:
511:
500:
493:
427:
417:
401:
397:
396:
390:
386:
385:
379:
375:
374:
368:
364:
363:
357:
353:
352:
331:
296:
295:
292:
289:
286:
285:Military history
265:
258:
257:
252:
249:
234:Military history
230:
223:
193:
192:
189:
186:
183:
162:
157:
156:
155:
146:
139:
138:
133:
125:
118:
101:
92:
91:
84:
83:
75:
26:This article is
23:
16:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1139:
1138:
1122:
1102:
1079:
1059:
1023:
972:Second Boer War
964:Second Boer War
952:
917:
909:
886:
882:
859:
856:
821:
774:134.153.101.245
767:
755:Second Boer War
751:Second Boer War
743:
732:
717:
716:
650:
636:
588:High-importance
571:
568:
565:
562:
561:
539:
534:
532:
513:High‑importance
512:
506:
425:
399:
394:
388:
383:
377:
372:
366:
361:
355:
350:
293:
290:
287:
284:
283:
250:
236:
207:High-importance
190:
187:
184:
181:
180:
158:
153:
151:
132:High‑importance
131:
102:on Knowledge's
99:
89:
67:broad consensus
30:British English
12:
11:
5:
1272:
1270:
1262:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1176:
1171:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1141:
1140:
1121:
1118:
1101:
1100:First Boer war
1098:
1078:
1075:
1064:213.127.210.95
1058:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
951:
948:
916:
913:
908:
905:
893:90.212.163.132
881:
878:
855:
852:
851:
850:
820:
819:British Dress?
817:
805:58.106.236.249
742:
739:
731:
728:
726:
723:
719:
718:
715:
714:
701:
700:
696:
695:
691:
690:
685:
684:
678:
646:First Boer War
633:
631:
624:
623:
620:
619:
616:
615:
606:
596:
595:
584:
578:
577:
575:
558:the discussion
545:
544:
528:
516:
515:
501:
489:
488:
485:
484:
481:
480:
475:
465:
464:
459:
449:
448:
443:
433:
432:
430:
428:
422:
421:
413:
412:
409:
408:
406:
404:
403:
402:
391:
380:
369:
358:
344:
343:
341:
328:
318:
317:
306:
300:
299:
297:
266:
254:
253:
231:
219:
218:
215:
214:
203:
197:
196:
194:
182:British Empire
177:the discussion
173:British Empire
164:
163:
147:
135:
134:
129:British Empire
126:
114:
113:
107:
85:
71:
70:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1271:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1144:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1119:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1107:120.18.69.163
1099:
1097:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1076:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1020:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
992:
988:
984:
979:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
949:
947:
946:
942:
938:
934:
929:
927:
923:
914:
912:
906:
904:
902:
898:
894:
890:
879:
877:
875:
871:
867:
863:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
836:
835:
834:
830:
826:
818:
816:
814:
810:
806:
802:
794:
790:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
763:
762:
759:
756:
752:
748:
740:
738:
736:
729:
727:
724:
712:
708:
703:
702:
698:
697:
693:
692:
687:
686:
682:
681:
680:
677:
674:
671:
668:
665:
662:
659:
656:
653:
649:
647:
643:
632:
630:
629:
613:
612:
602:
598:
597:
593:
589:
583:
580:
579:
576:
559:
555:
551:
550:
542:
531:
529:
526:
522:
521:
517:
510:
505:
502:
499:
495:
479:
471:
467:
466:
463:
455:
451:
450:
447:
439:
435:
434:
431:
429:
424:
423:
418:
414:
407:
405:
400:criterion met
392:
389:criterion met
381:
378:criterion met
370:
367:criterion met
359:
348:
347:
346:
345:
342:
339:
338:
332:
329:
324:
320:
319:
315:
314:quality scale
311:
305:
302:
301:
298:
281:
277:
273:
272:
267:
264:
260:
259:
255:
248:
244:
240:
235:
232:
229:
225:
212:
208:
202:
199:
198:
195:
178:
174:
170:
169:
161:
150:
148:
145:
141:
140:
136:
130:
127:
124:
120:
115:
111:
105:
97:
96:
86:
82:
77:
76:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
31:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1123:
1103:
1083:main article
1080:
1060:
1024:
980:
953:
930:
918:
910:
887:— Preceding
883:
880:Introduction
866:66.110.240.5
857:
822:
795:
791:
788:
764:
754:
744:
733:
725:
722:
679:
672:
666:
660:
654:
640:
634:
609:
587:
563:South Africa
554:South Africa
547:
504:South Africa
335:
309:
269:
206:
166:
110:WikiProjects
93:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
27:
860:—Preceding
799:—Preceding
768:—Preceding
707:Billtorbitt
376:Structure:
100:Start-class
28:written in
1143:Categories
1127:Boby123321
1087:Alcmaeonid
1005:Mr.User200
741:Page split
735:To do list
642:To-do list
1057:"laagers"
960:Boer Wars
840:Fidodog14
98:is rated
39:travelled
1026:section.
956:Boer War
950:Boer War
937:Zarpboer
922:WP:CIVIL
889:unsigned
862:unsigned
801:unsigned
782:contribs
770:unsigned
747:Boer War
509:Politics
337:criteria
247:European
51:artefact
926:WP:NPOV
730:Comment
670:refresh
658:history
590:on the
310:C-class
251:C‑class
243:British
239:African
209:on the
55:analyse
47:defence
1043:TH1980
1028:TH1980
854:Format
106:scale.
43:centre
35:colour
974:(see
966:(see
664:watch
87:This
1131:talk
1111:talk
1091:talk
1068:talk
1047:talk
1032:talk
1009:talk
991:talk
976:here
968:hist
941:talk
907:NPOV
897:talk
870:talk
844:talk
829:talk
809:talk
778:talk
711:talk
652:edit
644:for
582:High
201:High
1062:it.
987:PBS
978:.
1145::
1133:)
1113:)
1093:)
1085:~
1070:)
1049:)
1034:)
1011:)
993:)
943:)
899:)
872:)
846:)
831:)
811:)
780:•
507::
426:/
245:/
241:/
237::
53:,
49:,
45:,
41:,
37:,
1129:(
1109:(
1089:(
1066:(
1045:(
1030:(
1007:(
989:(
939:(
895:(
868:(
842:(
827:(
807:(
776:(
709:(
673:·
667:·
661:·
655:·
648::
614:.
594:.
316:.
304:C
282:.
213:.
112::
69:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
