Talk:Frankenstein/Archive 2

2848:"When I found so astonishing a power placed within my hands, I hesitated a long time concerning the manner in which I should employ it. Although I possessed the capacity of bestowing animation, yet to prepare a frame for the reception of it, with all its intricacies of fibres, muscles, and veins, still remained a work of inconceivable difficulty and labour. I doubted at first whether I should attempt the creation of a being like myself, or one of simpler organization; but my imagination was too much exalted by my first success to permit me to doubt of my ability to give life to an animal as complex and wonderful as man. The materials at present within my command hardly appeared adequate to so arduous an undertaking, but I doubted not that I should ultimately succeed. I prepared myself for a multitude of reverses; my operations might be incessantly baffled, and at last my work be imperfect, yet when I considered the improvement which every day takes place in science and mechanics, I was encouraged to hope my present attempts would at least lay the foundations of future success. Nor could I consider the magnitude and complexity of my plan as any argument of its impracticability. It was with these feelings that I began the creation of a human being. As the minuteness of the parts formed a great hindrance to my speed, I resolved, contrary to my first intention, to make the being of a gigantic stature, that is to say, about eight feet in height, and proportionably large." 300:“I am by birth a Genevese, and my family is one of the most distinguished of that republic.” (Shelly) The first sentence begins very fluid and informs us of the narrator’s family stature of their birth origin. The first sentence gives the reader a fact statement. The narrator is from Geneva, which I had to research, is a nation of Switzerland. The narrator also writes that they are from a high political prominence in that nation. This does not give the reader any indication where the story’s direction of a plot will proceed, but it does give the reader the basis of the knowledge of the narrator’s place in society. I may expect the story to follow with a more in depth detailed perspective of his/her life growing up in a high statured Genevese family. This sentence leaves the reader with wanting to discover more about this family and how this person is going to develop, and allow us to explore into the tale of Frankenstein. -Unsigned 1759:

impossible. While the exact details of the monster's construction are left ambiguous Shelley's depiction of the monster is akin to that of a golem." However, in the book (which I just finished) page 38 states: "The dissecting room and the slaughter-house furnished many of my materials;". The only reference I can see to using non-organic matter to form the monster is page 37: "Who shall conceive the horrors of my secret toil, as I dabbled among the unhallowed damps of the grave, or tortured the living animal to animate the lifeless clay?". In spite of the mention of clay, I don't believe this is a reference to the literal building of the body out of clay but is using clay as a metaphor for the tissue in reference to the Biblical creation of Adam from dust.

1840:"It was also a warning against the expansion of modern man in the Industrial Revolution, alluded to in the novel's subtitle, The Modern Prometheus." I know that this is a very common interpretation of the book. However, there are critics who distance themselves from this point of view by pointing out that the book is not against the dangers of science and industrialisation per se but rather it deals with the question of responsibility. After all the "monster" is pure and good in the beginning and it is the reaction of the humans (they don't respect and accept him) that drives him mad. 1912:

enough from just semen and dung, as back then it was believed semen had "little men" inside). This is however not featured in the article, giving galvanism a degree if importance (perhaps to link it to the movies), but not a mention of his obssesion with alchemical books, which in the book are dismissed by his proffesors. Alchemy back in the day not also hoped to achieve transmutation of gold, but all sorts of wild and unrealistic goals, among them Immortality, a cure for all illnesses and the creation of life (which dates even 500 years before Paracelsus).--

1665:

process of creation. In fact, she states pretty clearly that Frankenstein began with dead human flesh, breaking it down into its unspecified (but presumably alchemical) components, then building it back up into new usable tissues. It does not at any time imply that he built the monster from scratch, merely that he broke down existing material and rebuilt it according to his needs. In fact, the entire reason the monster is huge is because Frankenstein hadn't the ability to work on the microscopic scale of natural human bodies.

31: 4092: 2405:"He has the idea to bring to life a human-like creature. However, Victor Frankenstein is a doctor who seems discontent and achieves satisfaction by exploring the supernatural realm. The creation of his monster comes about because of his unchecked intellectual ambition: he had been striving for something beyond his control." This is awful, and I urge someone with the time and talent to rewrite the entire section. 2226: 2054:

Paradise Lost, Plutarch's Lives, and Gibbon's The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. I'm sure someone probably knows of some scholarly work examining the impact of the monster's reading on his actions and behavior, so I'll leave it to someone with more citable knowledge than me to work this in, but it really does need to be there. What the monster knows is central to the novel. --

240:

of information (the people whom we should be catering to, as they are the ones who will make us the first-choice for quick information on the net) will be using Internet Explorer to do so, and since the extra lines will help make the page more accessible and usable for them, without unduly hurting those who use other browsers, it would be best for the spacing to stay. Thank you.

2803:

leaving off the "and not an error" part still gets across that everyone will understand to whom you are referring when you say "Frankenstein" while not getting too worked up over a usage not supported by the text. And at the same time not implying that the text uses the name "Frankenstein" in this manner. Or perhaps a compromise of "well-established and an acceptable usage."?

2688: 2497:; a way of showing that the story takes place in the 18th century without providing a specific date); but various references to books and literary quotations show that the principal events cannot take place earlier than the 1790s, indeed most likely the last years of the 1790s. Of course it cannot take place later than 1818, the date of publication. 2529:. These are very interesting facts, but what I am suggesting is that these facts are inappropriate on the Frankenstein page. However, it might be instead appropriate to delete these anecdotes from this page, and, instead, be added onto the author's own pages or works. These digressions detract from Mary Shelley and her own work. 3891:. Throughout this article is "Shelley" naming problem either Percy or Mary, then use Godwin but meaning which, then if Mary but her mother? Old English usage of siring is an act while paternity the issue and doesn't clarify. The age old debate of what happened with whom that weekend is suggested as no one knows and it reeks of 344:

whole new world of science and discoveries. And even if the influences on the story are known, personally I wouldn't mind reading some of the influence the book itself had on others. I'm not referring to the stage plays, movie and comic versions and so on, but if and how it influenced other writers back then in their own work.

1738:

after that references (albeit in improper format) Arthur Belefant, the paragraph after that provides references (some improperly formatted, granted), etc. I think it would be better to remove only those sections without citations and work on the formatting of the other citations rather than omitting the entire section.

1451:

rate there is considerable evidence that the latter had some considerable influence through polishing, giving of advice, ... (Which is obviously what one would expect under the circumstances.) That a teenager (of either sex) writes a work of this accomplishment and import without assistance is more or less unheard of.

2379:"We understand that the writer of this is a female. This only makes the fact that she would write such (sordid, macabre, vile) things worse for us. Even though she can forget that she is a female and of the gentler sex, we will not. We therefore will refrain from commenting on it any more (from criticising it). 1367:'s comment suggests that s/he thought the paragraph equates the weight of Lauritsen's hypothesis to that of 200 years of scholarship. This is not the case, as a reading of the paragraph will confirm. There is a role in an encyclopedia for minority views, if they are labeled as such, and have provoked discussion. 981:, and trivia in Knowledge is officially discouraged (rightly so). I think the "...in popular culture" section here should be replaced with one concerning adaptations for stage and film, changing the title accordingly and erasing redundant references to these adaptations now scattered throughout the article. 3139:

I'm suspicious of any publication date that says specifically "January 1". I very strongly suspect the involvement of some code that insists on a full date, and supplies the first of the month if there is no day and January if there is no month specified. I am all but absolutely certain that the only

2943:

edition, Shelley says of the conversations, "During one of these, various philosophical doctrines were discussed, and among other, the nature of the principle of life, and whether there was any probability of its ever being discovered and communicated." I'm not sure if there's actually any supporting

2385:

But they did not "attack her feminimity" or what the original text said. They did make reference to it, and this may be seen as creating too much bias in modern times, in particular if they would have extensively commented more on a male's work. But it was not an attack on feminimity as it originally

1706:

When I removed it, in my edit summary I called it a "Criticism" section. Wrong term in quotes, I meant "Analysis;" rest of my rationale still stands. Sorry; please discuss this removal on the talk page if you have an issue. It is not intended to be vandalism; my experience is that sections of this

1122:

The "Styles and genres" and "Themes" layout needs to be improved. The coverage of letters and the frame story is much smaller than then gothic or science fiction. Also, what about the sublime and horror? Also, the themes listed here are some of the more insignificant themes covered by the literature.

343:

Maybe, but either way, maybe a new section of this article is required. When it comes to influence, it is mostly literary influences that is mentioned, and very little about the scientific and social influences. The novel is in this regard a product of its time, in an era that stood on the brink of a

273:

I see a redirect of some of t he characters in this novel has been boldly attempted, and reverted, so i will discus at this more central place. all named characters in classic novels with any significant role in the story are notable. There is invariably published criticism of such novels which will

239:

I have looked at this page using Firefox and Safari, and the extra space, which is not necessary for these browsers, is not a real problem -- it's not like it creates an acre of whitespace, it's just an extra line. Since an awful lot of the people who casually drop in on Knowledge to find some piece

1911:

The turning point for young Victor in the novel is an Alchemical book by Cornelius Agrippa that he stumbles upon, later on he mentions both Albertus Magnus and Paracelsus as other alchemists he likes to read. Paracelsus even claimed in the Renaissance that he created life, or a Humunculus (strangely

1626:

In Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein, Victor became addicted to create life in a scense because I think he felt a burden of not being able to save his mother who died during childbirth. Victor's addiction became so overpowering that it was stated that he secluded himself from everone who loved him,

788:

of this article needs to be restructured to follow the guidelines. The images are all PD. This article is quite deficient in citations. There are several entire paragraphs without a single citation. In fact, some entire sections have no references. The citation needed tag(s) need to be resolved.

235:

A couple of people have attempted to remove the spacers in the article, and I'd like to explain to them why they are there. The spacers are there to correct a problem with the way Internet Explorer renders the page. Without them, the lede section butts right up against the table of contents, making

4067:

In accordance with the note, shouldn't the lead statement be edited? It seems to also imply support for the theory that the Castle and Dippel were an inspiration for Victor Frankenstein which, while there is scholarly support for, there is also scholarly disagreement/lack of a consensus. I'd say to

3348:

Two hundred years later, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is still essential reading for anyone working in science. The ill-fated creator she portrays has influenced public perception of the scientific enterprise unlike any other character, forever haunting the borderland between what science can do and

2802:

I agree with you overall. There's a difference between what is accepted as common usage and what is technically correct. Saying that using "Frankenstein" is "not an error" is the same thing as stating literally that the text refers to the monster as "Frankenstein" when clearly it doesn't. I think

3833:

Mary and Percy's trip with Claire to visit her lover Lord Byron, in Geneva during the summer of 1816, began the friendship amongst the two couples in which Byron suggested they have a competition of writing the best ghost story. Historians suggest an affair occurred too, even that paternity of one

3636:

Can someone improve this sentence? It sounds to me like the article is supporting the claim that finding fire led to eating meat, which is at best controversial. Humans ate meat before they discovered fire; if anything, the ability to cook made them eat less meat because of the newfound ability to

3610:

for some of the context here). I don't want to discourage anyone from taking it on, but it's a massive effort and will require a solid background in English literature. For a GA run you may be able to get away with just pruning the trivia and cruft, and adding cites where missing, depending on the

3603:

has an immense footprint in pop culture, you will also need a massive amount of coverage from the perspective of literature, literary history, its own historiography, feminism and gender studies, Shelley's biography and historiography, Percy Bysshe Shelley's biography and historiography, and quite

2765:

Why should it matter what usage commentators say? It's fashionable today to say that any usage or grammatical construction is correct if enough people think it is. The question here, however, concerns what was actually written down in the pages of this novel, and not the muddled understanding of

2653:

That's not necessary. As with Oscar Hammerstein and Albert Einstein, English speakers usually pronounce the "steins" with an 's' sound. Instead of using the English Knowledge to filter things through to other language wikis, why not just add information to them directly? I don't know why even that

1995:

He says he OUGHT to have been Frankenstein's Adam, but instead turned out to be the Fallen Angel. This is a metaphor; he's describing roles, not actual names. As far as I'm able to determine, Shelley did not 'refer' to the monster by any name, and in fact in a letter to Leigh Hunt seems calls it

1926:

I agree that alchemy is an important aspect of the novel, including the creation of the monster. The creation of a homunculus is part of the art of alchemy, which might also explain the golem discussion below: Frankenstein took elemental materials from charnel houses, but the process of creation

1737:

Plenty of classic works have sections on analysis/symbolism/interpretation or something along those lines. Much of the information was also cited: (parts of) the first three paragraphs, the paragraph referencing Carol Adams, the paragraph after that provides a reference to upenn.edu, the paragraph

1721:

I agree that "Analysis" wasn't all that great, but I think some of it could be saved. Maybe the last few (well-cited) paragraphs could be moved to a new section called "Authorship Controversy". I wouldn't have a problem with an analysis section that discussed, and cited, commentary on the novel;

1182:

Parts of the CC are available through Google Books, but not everything. Very little for this project is going to be available online, I'm afraid. The Broadview edition has an excellent introduction - I'll list themes from its introduction this weekend. Do you want to split up the books I listed in

3687:

What does any of this ideology have anything to do with her? Only vaguely to Percy and an academic convo about the subject for people in general, needs to be removed, bloats the article with supposition that wasn't part of authorship of novel but analysis afterward. Abrupt with no binding thread.

2759:

Since publication of the novel, the name "Frankenstein" is often used to refer to the monster itself, as is done in the stage adaptation by Peggy Webling. This usage is sometimes considered erroneous, but usage commentators regard the monster sense of "Frankenstein" as well-established and not an

1664:

He's not saying we should recite the entire story. The article as it is is inaccurate. Shelley very strongly implies that the process by which the monster is created uses alchemical methods. The article is already inaccurate in stating (several times) that Shelley was purposely vague about the

1450:

According to WP's POV guidelines even minority views have a right to representation (unless their importance is too low or multitude too high). As is, there are only two theories I have regularly heard mentioned, namely that (obviously) Mary wrote the book and that (alternately) Percy did. At any

3491:

Links to archives and a search field would be provided in the boxy-thingy up top of the page. Archiving would typically happen along the lines of: threads older than X days (typically something like 30, 60, 90, 120) are periodically moved into Archive N, until Archive N exceeds a given byte size

2478:

I'd go with the first. This is science fiction and concerns the hypothetical application of real recent scientific advances. (Richard Holmes's "The Age of Wonder" suggests--fairly convincingly, I'd say-- that Victor Frankenstein's experiments may be based on those of one real-life Johann Wilhelm

4198:

I'm pretty sure what you're describing doesn't exist. There are two different versions of the book (this is covered in the Publication section of the article) but the revisions aren't that big. It is easier to understand Victor's motivations in the later version, but the tone of the story isn't

3860:

If historians suggest affairs additional to the three already clearly described may have occurred, then let us enumerate those suggestions (with corresponding citations) such as if Lord Byron committed an affair with Shelly, or if Lord Byron committed an affair with Mary. Evidently any children

2053:

Considering how important the 4 books are to the monster (being his only education, and thus his entire set of knowledge beyond direct experience), you'd think the article would at least name them. Sadly, its been over a decade since i read the book, and I can only remember 3 of them: Milton's

215:

The criticism offered in this section is subpar, and does not match the ostensible topic. Statements indicating that the only thing Victor "does wrong" is neglect the creature indicate the text author does not grasp the moral complexity of the story, nor sees such writing as divergent from the

2177:

How about requesting protection or semi-protection? These essays, which are evidently part of some school project, show up periodically. It would be nice to get some clue as to what the school is, but in lieu of that perhaps disabling editing for a while would discourage the instructor -- or

1758:

In this article, it is stated that the monster was not made up of dead bits, but was like a golem: "In contrast with later film adaptations the monster in the original novel was not created from dead body parts. In fact Frankenstein himself concedes that he later found that reversing death was

403:

The plot overview/synopsis leaves out a number of events very central to the plot and some of its most significant examples of social commentary. For example, the being's stay with the cottagers only receives a few lines, as does his story to Frankenstein as a whole. Also, I just revamped the

278:

in particular there is an enormous literature, to due both its iconic position, the multiple popular cultural adaptations, and the interest in the author. This is not a function of any particular privileged aesthetic position the classic novels may have to any individual, but rather the time

3951:

Good question! Grammar was not fully formalised at the time of Shelley's writing, and much of these little flourishes were left up to the authors' preferences. For example, Henry James had a penchant for writing "did n't" instead of the more modern "didn't", and publications simply obliged.

3958:

uses a comma (Shakespeare's subtitle was a parody of subtitles, given that it means absolutely nothing — Shelley's subtitle was genuinely informative to her readers, hinting at what was to come). Rather than thinking of it as a subtitle, Shelley might have thought of it as an

2370:

The writer of it is, we understand, a female; this is an aggravation of that which is the prevailing fault of the novel; but if our authoress can forget the gentleness of her sex, it is no reason why we should; and we shall therefore dismiss the novel without further comment"

2843:

The books makes no mention of Frankenstein sewing together mismatched body parts or "pieces of cadavers", and doing so would be completely inconsistent with making the creature eight feet tall and proportionally large to facilitate dealing with the minuteness of the parts.

3492:(e.g. 100kb), at which point further threads are moved to Archive N+1. A minimum number of threads (2-3) are typically kept irrespective of age. With this configuration, on the first archive run, all threads barring this one and the three preceding ones would be archive. 1163:

By the way, is the Cambridge Companion is available through any online resources? The only thing I physically possess is the Norton Critical edition of the book (which contains some essays not listed in the bibliography) but I can get everything else through the library.

376:

I don't know if I'm the right one to rewrite the whole article, but you could post the links you have in mind so that at least some parts of it can be updated. And even if I can't promise anything for sure, other could might have in interest in doing some edits as well.

3599:, both from an aborted 2010 effort to bring the article up to standard. You'll need to search the literature for newer sources too, as there have been some new developments since that list was put together. And before you embark on this project, be aware that while 3632:"Some have claimed that for Mary Shelley, Prometheus was not a hero but rather something of a devil, whom she blamed for bringing fire to man and thereby seducing the human race to the vice of eating meat (fire brought cooking which brought hunting and killing)." 2520:

page. I understand that these men had a large influence on Mary Shelley and her novel, but there seems to be a digression of the actual work in question in the Composition and the Modern Prometheus section. These sections include Byron's writings that influenced

328:

Usually for literature articles, we use scholarship published by literary critics (see the list of books in the article). No one has really delved into these sources for this article yet, however, which is why the article is so deficient. Would you like to help?

2637:

Shouldn't we clarify the pronunciation of "Frankenstein"? I've only heard the 'stein' part pronounced as 's' in English, but Poles, for instance, say 'shtein'. It might help to give guidance on this and it can eventually filter through to other language wikis.

961:

As "Frankenstein in popular culture" is an enormous topic, I was wondering whether or not we should recruit someone to work on this section. I'm not particularly keen to work on it myself, being much more interested in the literary end of things. Thoughts?

3289:

I did a cursory Google search and found no reference to this phrase previous to October 2011. Though I do see a lot of people parroting the quote as fact, citing this page. Where in the world did it come from and how has it gone unnoticed for so long?

833:(see the article's talk) were planning on working on this article this summer (July was mentioned on Awadewit's talk), and at least Awadewit has a vacation notice up on her talk right now. IOW, this may be about the worst possible timing for a GAR. -- 3116:

Looking for the answer to the question, "How old was Mary Shelley when Frankenstein was published?" I keep coming across the answer "21." She was born in late 1797. Book was published Jan 1, 1818. But she didn't turn 21 until August of 1818. Right?

3611:

reviewer you get. But if you aim for FA I strongly suggest you find a couple of collaborators (Awadewit is sadly no longer with us, and I doubt Laser brain has the time for such a project these days, or I'd recommend getting in touch with them). --

3462:

Her time spent with Lord Byron, Percy Shelley, her baby, and her sister Jane influenced her creation of Frankenstein as well. Percy and Byron's discussion on life and death surrounded many scientific geniuses of the time. They discussed ideas from

1571:

I wrote most of that section from a scholarly, peer-reviewed article I came across. All the stuff about Whale's films is from that article. How can we be certain that it wasn't Whale's own interpretation anyway? Can we prove that he did not agree?

2586:

It seems to me doubtful one can reasonably call middle twentieth-century assessment of an early nineteenth-century work "reception". The novel had already been received long before. "Critical reception" here should be replaced with some term like

4151:

With no references, it cannot be added, but with almost 700 people watching this page, there is bound to be someone who might know something. Just wait a bit and see if anyone comments or knows more information. If you want more help, change the

2294:

The following is a list of users or IP addresses that over the past year have attempted to post school papers in either the article space or Talk page space. The listing for the Talk page goes further back than the listing for the article space.

3534:. Archived threads are, of course, also still available in this page's revision history. All archives will be automatically listed in the archives box up top here, as will an index of topics for old threads in the archives.Please feel free to 3065:

Reports specify "paused" and is part of a larger Dark Universe plan. Removing it at this point would require an equally viable source for its cancellation. Give it a few days until a better source arrives, and a decision is made. There is no

2455:

two possible answers: during the present (Shelley's present)-- 1810s. Or, during an undefined, inexact pastoral/gothic/elegiac time that brings together elements of the present and the old-timey but which still should not be given a date.

4124:

Does anyone know about the original version of the story that was rejected by publishers, and why? It was NOT a horror story. Unfortunately, I do not have the references supporting this fact but the article should refer to this back-story.

442:

I believe the 1818 edition says "sister" and the 1831 edition says "cousin". There are other differences between the two editions. I would suggest we use the 1818 edition to write the plot summary, as it is the one used by most scholars.

2766:

the popular imagination. Facts are facts, and Frankenstein is the scientist. To use the name Frankenstein to refer to the monster is degrading to the novel and its author, for it diverts our attention away from the human protagonist.

880:

This article was passed many years ago for GA and obviously does not meet the criteria for GA - it is an atrocious article: there are many sections missing, much of the article is poorly written, and much of the article is not sourced.

1538:; it was not Whale's own interpretation of Shelley's novel. I thought I changed that several years ago, but all references to it have since been excised. If you're going to fault someone for taking liberties, fault the right person. 2904:

As this is only a rather colloquial way of using the term, one should — given it is meant like that, here — probably best replace it by "arcane", "upcoming scientific", or similar. This would but instantly rise the question if in the

1556:

and I are researching a new version of the article (see above list of sources). You are welcome to help - we particularly need to someone to work on the "Frankenstein in popular culture" section. Would you be willing to take this on?

847:

Many GARs take 4 or 5 weeks to resolve. If in that time there is no sign of improvement efforts we can evaluate the article for delisting. I will keep this open for at least 4 or 5 weeks. Five weeks will take us past the middle of

172:, so you might ask him for assistance. If you need any more help finding sources, please let us know (I provided the list in the article - if you have questions about it, just ask!). Again, thanks so much for the work you are doing! 1438:

Mary Shelley was highly affected by the circumstances in her life, the creation of the monster clearly portraying her deep fear of the power of electricity which was developed in her life time along with many other scientific break

431:

is anything to go by, then Elizabeth is both Victor's cousin and his adoptive sister (in the first edition, that is). In the third edition, she is no longer his cousin. Perhaps the plot summary needs tweaking to reflect this? –

3353:

Researchers, especially in the life sciences, are understandably anxious about being tainted with the “F-word.” To the charge of playing God, they usually react by professing humility, but some take a more defiant attitude.

2923:, there is meant a discussion about galvanism and other upcoming scientific insights or one about galvanism and, moreover, certain esoteric speculations. I for my part cannot fix the spot, because I don`t know the facts. -- 83:

I have removed from the "analysis" section a number of unsourced and badly written stand alone essays. I encourage folks to expand the analysis section, but only with sourced information from recognized reliable sources.

1953:

The link to the source was dead, and I cannot find any evidence to verify that Shelley actually referred to the monster as Adam except metaphorically, in the text itself. I would be fascinated to be proved wrong! :)

3526:. Each time the bot runs (about once a day I think) it will archive all threads with no replies more recent than 90 days. It will always leave at least 3 threads here regardless of age. Archived threads are written to 1813:

How much did Shelley know about the golem tales or was she oblivious about them from lack of contact with jewish litterature and traditions? Were the golem tales commonly known by the gentile community of that time?

1362:

took it out again. S/he read the book's reviews (though apparently not the book itself) and learned that Lauritsen's hypothesis is a distinctly minority one. However, it already said that in the disputed paragraph.

1123:

I would not dedicate entire sections to these at all. What about the Romantic individual? Feminism? Reproduction? The themes section needs to be radically rethought. Let's start by building a list of themes from the

781: 236:

it look unpleasant and causing it to be difficult to read. The same is true at the bottom of the page where the external links butt up against the navbox. This problem is not seen by people using other browsers.

3712:

Pygmalion (play) can't possibly be a literary influence on Frankenstein, since it was written over 100 years later. What is this line supposed to say? Is it supposed to refer to Pygmalion (mythology), instead?

3281:

Supposedly they we're clarifying a statement: "During a telling of Frankenstein, Shelley referred to the creature as "Adam"." That sentence cited a PDF that doesn't exist anymore, but which is the full text of

1469:

view. Among Shelley scholarship, no one takes seriously the theory that Percy wrote the book - only that he edited it. You are welcome to read through the list of books we have listed below to establish this.

279:

available for discussion, and the academic interest in particular to them over the last century or two. . Personally, I've never been a man of this, so i hope someone else will do the work of adding them..

2731:

The categories on this article are out of control. It should be in categories as reflected by reliable sources in the article body. It's a gothic fiction novel—anything else I would question or challenge.

616:

I was on vacation for a while - didn't get to this until now. Drafts are advantageous because you can work "in private" for a while and be messy - sentence fragments, no formatting - that sort of thing.

4039:

The second line of the entry states "a young scientist who creates a sapient creature in an unorthodox scientific experiment." Surely the word sentient is the one most apt here. (rather than sapient)

3847:

Shelly also committed an affair with Claire ("On 22 February 1815, (...) Percy did not care about the condition of this premature infant and left with Claire, Mary's stepsister, for a lurid affair.")

4069: 2346:

Not all the IP addresses are from the same location. One is from Doylestown, PA, and one is from Denver, CO. The specific request for help for a school paper is from an IP in Atlanta, Georgia.

885:

and I are currently working on improving it (you can see our plan on the talk page as well as our notes). If you want to delist it, go ahead. The article will take several months to complete.

730: 2253:

can i request that there be a headline for themes in the book. There are themes like dangerous knowledge, monstrosity, secrecy, revenge, a life without love, and so forth. The source is

189:

The analysis section is plagued by broken sentences, and ideas. Most notable is "Hannah", whom people should just ignore; her input is very poor, as is her ability to write coherently.

3778: 3140:

documentation consulted for the date of publication said just "1818"; probably the title page of the first edition of volume I, as shown in the article. At the bottom it says "1818"--

3777:

The article says that the story "takes place at an unspecified time in the 18th century". In fact it can be narrowed down a bit further than that. In chapter 13 there's a reference to

3244:

1826: Henry M. Milner's adaptation, The Man and The Monster; or The Fate of Frankenstein opened on 3 July at the Royal Coburg Theatre, London -- is the 1826 publication date correct?

4011:

As seen in: Summary - Captain Walton's introductory narrative - It says: (...)"The story likely takes place in 1817 (the letters are dated as "17"). The first letter date as seen in

1843:

Another point:footnote 18 gives a reference to (Leonard Wolf, p.20). However, I can't the full reference (i.e. title of the book, year of publication etc.). Am I missing something?

1891:

Sorry, these talk pages are for discussions about improvement of the article, not general discussion of the subject, nor is Knowledge really a tutoring or consulting organization!--

1197:

Sure thing. I have access to most library resources and will endeavor to obtain anything that's only available in hardcopy. My ILL and doc delivery services are pretty efficient. --

2716:

Somebody categorized it as a fantasy novel. Is it? Where's the magic in it? I thought it's soft science fiction. Can somebody please clarify? If not, then remove that category.--

142: 3273:

This uncited quote is not in the novel and yet has remained on this page for, as far as I can tell, about six and a half years, since user WickerGuy edited it in October 2011.

2611:

This entire section appears to be plagiarized from another source - complete with the author's parenthetical footnotes. It should be re-written, or else properly credited.

315: 4199:

greatly changed. Both versions were published. It is true that it was rejected a couple times before it was published, but AFAIK no major changes were made in that period.

3840:". Mary didn't marry Shelly until 30 December 1816, three weeks after he became a widower. Therefore at this juncture in the narrative it is already well established that: 3469:" (emphasis added) This is impossible, given that Charles Darwin was born in 1809, so in 1816, when Mary Shelley wrote the novel, Darwin would've been 7 or 8 years old. 2382:

I actually made a mistake in the comment with my edit by saying that it was they would NOT forget ("go easy") on her because of her gender, actually they did say that.

1534:

The section, "Frankenstein in popular culture" seem to be "blaming" James Whale for the deviations in his film from the Shelley novel. Whale's version was written by

2821:

Should the creature not receive the name of its father? It is, after all, not only Frankenstein's monster, but in a very real sense a sort of son of his as well...

540:, written in Bath immediately after Fanny killed herself, begins the new story of Justine." Todd is, of course, the author of a major biography of Wollstonecraft. 358:

Sadly, every section of this article is deficient! If you want, I can guide you to some specific sources that discuss the scientific and cultural influences behind

2940: 2654:

would be necessary. Anyone communicating in German or Polish is bound to pronounce it "shtein" anyway. I'm not sure what you think this would accomplish.

3393: 1762:

I would agree that Frankenstein noted that he couldn't reverse death, but the text seems to indicate that he did use organic bits to build his creation.

734: 3050:. It is not a "film featuring Frankenstein" that exists, and is not even in production. If they eventually end up making it, it can be added again. -- 738: 726: 2440:

I think that's the setting but if anyone could bring quotation to give a better idea of when the novel is set, it would improve the article a lot...

1826: 3390: 3087: 2871:

The lead section refers to "the topics of galvanism and other similar occult ideas". Is it reasonable to describe galvanism as an "occult idea"?

404:

synopsis into the literary present, but it's still pretty poorly written. Would someone mind taking some time editing that section for language?

598:

I've never used a draft before, but I've also never worked on an article that had many hands in it. What are the advantages of using a draft? --

3861:

arising from a union between Lord Byron and Mary would not have been a "Shelly" as Mary was still single at that point (that is, she was still

1382:

We don't include every minority view in the article. It has to gain some traction. This one has next to none. There are many minority views on

536:

There are a dozen pages listed in the index for Frankenstein, including a close timeline of one part of the writing. e.g. p252. "Chapter 5 of

2782: 931:

Currently, it is not a GA and if the GA community doesn't want to wait months for us to bring it up to GA status, they should delist it now.

3873: 2463: 2191: 1913: 1876: 1850: 1799: 3727:

Good call, corrected it after finding the right pygmalion. A French authorship based on same mythology. Unsure what mayhem occurs, lol.

3314:"Remember, that I am thy creature; I ought to be thy Adam; but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed." 3251: 2618: 2498: 2187: 2118: 2003: 1961: 1934: 1781: 1708: 1628: 1452: 680: 196: 99:, and is not a general forum for discussion about the book. Only conversation pertinent to improving the article should be held here. 4073: 3865:) and her affair with Shelly would have nothing to do with the name of children arising from her hypothetical affair with Lord Byron. 3638: 3297: 909: 858: 803: 758: 378: 345: 4111: 3573: 2872: 2822: 2096: 2055: 3807:(1774; first French translation 1776, although Shelley might not have known that). Shelley's mis-spelling "Werter" may be from an 2117:

Constantin-François de Volney’s Ruins of Empires is in the novel, and is where the monster primarily gets his knowledge of history.

4019:

Correct. The story takes place in the 1700s, and that's all we know. Who is Captain Walton and why do we care what he thinks? ^^

3212:

This day is published, in 3 vols., price 16s. 6d., a Work of Imagination, to be entitled Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus.

913: 862: 807: 762: 4140: 3954: 3389:

So, I'll draft up something here. The introductory article is available online, Here's the first supporting article + graphic:

666: 3488:

This talk page is getting kinda unwieldy. Would anyone object if I tried to set up one of the bots to do automatic archiving?

2026:. He did produce artificial life. Frankenstein may have fail to look after his creation but the succeeded in creating life. 2545: 2274:

Only when appropriate content is added and such content cannot be lifted from Spark Notes! Their material is copyrighted!!!--

1627:

even his childhood love, Elizabeth. This seclusion and addiction drove Victor into a world that in the end took his life. --

694: 254:

Incidentally, if anyone is using a browser other than IE, Firefox or Safari, let me know and I'll look at the page using it.

4012: 3945: 3606: 3531: 3527: 160: 4177: 3047: 1927:

what more chemical than surgical, it would seem. Where would he get body parts to create an eight-foot-tall humanoid?

722: 3596: 1682:

and I are in the middle researching a new version of the article (see above list of sources). You are welcome to help.

3362:

is on record as having said about his synthesis of a microbe with a minimal genome: “Shelley would have loved this!”

3168:

appear to have been 1 January 1818, though being suspicious of the first of January in general is quite reasonable. --

2563:

What is interesting to note about these glowing reviews is that the critics assume that the anonymous author is a man.

2445: 433: 59: 2968: 2156: 2039: 708: 583:

in a couple of week, as I will be teaching it, so I thought that would be a good time to work on the plot summary.

464: 38: 3972: 1722:

but I haven't done much editing of literature pages, so if it's not the norm to have such a section, that's okay.

1600:

Wrad, are you interested in doing any more research on the topic? As I said, we really need help on this section!

3905: 3737: 3698: 3161: 2928: 2792: 2778: 3276: 1489:

Indeed it's a fringe view. I teach this book every year -- few scholars take the Percy view seriously anymore.

1145:

Absolutely, I will be working further on it. This is a living outline just meant to get conversation started. --

3968: 3941: 3756: 2467: 1854: 3877: 1917: 1880: 1803: 1512:

about the critic Daniel Walls. I can't seem to find anything confirming this person's supposedly famous view.

2622: 2122: 1712: 1456: 1386:- there are hundreds of books and articles on this novel. We don't include each one. Including this would be 524:. I'm not sure if I'll be able to contribute in a sustained way, but here is a book you may have overlooked: 200: 4156: 4024: 3994: 3763: 3642: 3301: 3255: 2502: 2232: 2183: 2007: 1965: 1938: 1777: 1632: 1281: 674: 221: 87:

Please do not add your own essays and homework assignments, or stuff lifted from term-paper sites on the web

3872:" with "Historians speculate Lord Byron may have sired at least one of Mary's children." to make it clear. 2876: 2826: 2100: 2059: 3870:

Historians suggest an affair occurred too, even that paternity of one Shelley child may have been a Byron.

3523: 2788: 2774: 2581:

Despite these initial dismissals, critical reception has been largely positive since the mid-20th century.

2441: 2022:

The first sentence says that the novel is about "a failed artificial life experiment". It didn't exactly

905: 854: 799: 754: 642: 488: 382: 349: 318: 3441:

is mentioned as an influence, which is odd, as he would have been 9 years old at the time of publication.

4015:

St. Petersburgh, Dec. 11th, 17—. Therefore the story cannot take place in 1817 but in the 18th Century.

3937: 3759: 3568: 3321: 3173: 3099: 3055: 3024: 3002: 2984: 2967:

we have a link to a random website providing ebooks of Frankenstein (as well as copyrighted works, like

2949: 2857: 2740: 2541: 1205: 1172: 1153: 1111: 1006: 670: 646: 606: 257: 243: 100: 1547: 2095:

I'd swear i remembered Gibbon being in there. Well, its been a long time, so maybe I'm just crazy. --

1996:"unnamable". Like I say, I'm happy to be proved wrong, but this fact remains unproven to me so far. 1976:

I believe that the monster refers to himself as Adam in the novel when ruminating over his reading of

4128: 3896: 3728: 3689: 3293: 3283: 3247: 3235: 3012:

Yes, I just noticed. Thanks. I supposed I should look up how to report that kind of thing. *chuckle*

2924: 2770: 2614: 2533: 2459: 1999: 1957: 1930: 1872: 1846: 1795: 1769: 1670: 1543: 1409: 1336: 545: 192: 3808: 3714: 2852:

This is presumably an example of portrayals in other media intruding into discussion of the book. --

2516:

I have noticed that there is a large amount of discussion about Percy Shelley and Lord Byron on the

1739: 4181: 4136: 3964: 3919: 3816: 3718: 3474: 2721: 2659: 2602: 2537: 2484: 2406: 2391: 2354: 2279: 2206: 2082: 1985: 1896: 1743: 1655: 1391: 1290: 986: 660: 579:

Do we want to create a draft article or just work on the "live" version? I'm going to be rereading

3341: 2260: 2063: 4189: 4173: 4115: 4052: 4020: 3990: 3674: 3657: 3442: 3429: 3227:

This section includes only one stage version of Frankenstein. Is it possible to include others?

3091: 3067: 2808: 2681: 2643: 2425: 2410: 2179: 1773: 1765:

Is the golem reference an original idea in this article? If not, who's idea was it? Citation?

1687: 1605: 1562: 1494: 1475: 1431: 1399: 1319: 1188: 1136: 967: 936: 890: 688: 622: 588: 564: 503: 472: 448: 367: 334: 217: 177: 3788:

as having taken place "more than a century and a half before". The Siege of Oxford was 1644-46.

2897:"The term is sometimes popularly taken to mean 'knowledge meant only for certain people' (...)" 1426:

Indeed. I don't have that article watchlisted, so I didn't know it was there. I've removed it.

1103:

I'd like to start organizing this article better to start moving toward an FA-quality drive. --

4204: 3406: 3378: 3270:'Speaking to Victor Frankenstein, the wretch refers to himself as "the Adam of your labours"' 2264: 1417: 1372: 917: 900: 866: 849: 811: 794: 766: 749: 483: 428: 427:

which changed the description of Elizabeth from "adopted cousin" to "adopted sister": if this

409: 154: 136: 47: 17: 4166: 4098: 3793: 3678: 3586: 3563: 3446: 3317: 3277:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Frankenstein&direction=next&oldid=456057083

3169: 3151: 3095: 3071: 3051: 3020: 2995: 2980: 2945: 2853: 2733: 2693: 1679: 1553: 1521: 1466: 1198: 1165: 1146: 1104: 1002: 882: 830: 716: 599: 312: 165: 119:

I see you are working on improving the article! Thanks so much! I am currently working on a

3785: 3616: 3547: 3512: 3363: 3231: 1727: 1666: 1539: 1535: 1387: 1332: 838: 790: 541: 308:

Could perhaps these links contain some interesting info worth mentioning in the article?;

148: 3562:

If I was to bring this page to GA status, what would be some essential sources I'd need?

3370:

Review of a 2018 reissue with critical commentary. I have the link & some remarks at

2349:

At any rate, we need to clearly communicate this is an inappropriate use for Knowledge.--

2254: 2011: 1969: 1792:

The text in the novel states that he examined the pieces but never that he used them...

3670:"However, none of the neglect stopped Shelley from becoming the great author she was." 2178:

encourage them to communicate. At least then the essays would just get posted on talk.

134:. I have recently started working on articles about Mary Shelley's lesser known works - 123: 4132: 3915: 3812: 3470: 3438: 3421: 3207: 3122: 3014: 2976: 2717: 2655: 2598: 2480: 2387: 2350: 2275: 2202: 2152: 2078: 2035: 1981: 1892: 1651: 1591: 1577: 1277: 1249: 982: 921: 870: 815: 785: 770: 702: 656: 4185: 4048: 3653: 3537: 3425: 2804: 2639: 2421: 1683: 1601: 1558: 1490: 1471: 1427: 1395: 1364: 1359: 1315: 1307: 1257: 1253: 1184: 1132: 963: 932: 886: 826: 684: 618: 584: 560: 521: 499: 468: 444: 363: 330: 286: 173: 3420:

It's surprising that the only specific named influence mentioned by Shelley -- i.e.

2912:"Shelley had travelled the region in which the story takes place, and the topics of 4200: 3892: 3887:

The problem is that Mary Godwin wrote Frankenstein but Mary Shelley published, but

3402: 3374: 3371: 3359: 3355: 1413: 1368: 997:

There's always the broader "Legacy" option. On a related note, last time I checked

405: 131: 120: 4208: 4193: 4144: 4091: 4077: 4056: 4028: 3998: 3923: 3909: 3881: 3820: 3797: 3767: 3752: 3741: 3722: 3702: 3682: 3661: 3646: 3620: 3578: 3551: 3516: 3478: 3450: 3433: 3410: 3382: 3325: 3305: 3259: 3239: 3177: 3155: 3126: 3103: 3081: 3059: 3028: 3007: 2988: 2953: 2932: 2880: 2861: 2830: 2812: 2796: 2745: 2725: 2703: 2663: 2647: 2626: 2606: 2549: 2506: 2488: 2471: 2449: 2429: 2414: 2395: 2358: 2283: 2268: 2210: 2195: 2160: 2143:

He found three, the fourth (Gibbon) he overheard Felix reading to his girlfriend.

2126: 2104: 2086: 2043: 1989: 1942: 1921: 1900: 1884: 1858: 1807: 1785: 1747: 1731: 1716: 1691: 1674: 1659: 1636: 1609: 1595: 1581: 1566: 1524: 1498: 1479: 1460: 1435: 1421: 1403: 1376: 1340: 1210: 1192: 1177: 1158: 1140: 1116: 1010: 990: 971: 940: 926: 894: 875: 842: 820: 775: 626: 611: 592: 568: 549: 507: 493: 476: 452: 436: 413: 386: 371: 353: 338: 322: 309: 290: 262: 248: 225: 204: 181: 110: 2916:

and other similar occult ideas were themes of conversation among her companions."

1650:

says about alchemy, just read the thing. The "Plot" section is too long already.

649:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment. 3789: 3147: 1515: 1303: 712: 556: 127: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4047:. Frankenstein created an intelligent lifeform, the equal (at least) of man. -- 4043:

Nope. "Sentient" is "having feeling", "sapient" is "having intelligence". Like

3850:

Lord Byron was also committing an affair with Claire (by whom she was pregnant)

3358:

once famously de[clared: “If scientists don't play God, who else is going to?”

1001:

had a decent pop culture section. I do agree that trivia needs to be avoided.

3612: 3543: 3508: 1723: 834: 80:

I have archived the previous discussion, which was quite long, and fairly old.

467:. It should be listed in the box above, but is not. Anyone know the problem? 3985:(because he thought of it as shortened form of "hath"?) but "I'll" he wrote 3784:, which was published in the 1790s, while in Chapter 19 Victor mentions the 3757:

http://movies2.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/20000813mag-onlanguage.html

3751:

In my opinion, it's worth mentioning somewhere that Mary's work created the

3199: 3142: 3134: 3118: 2913: 2144: 2027: 1587: 1573: 698: 3862: 3837: 1869:

i have to write a paper about frankenstein and i don't know what to write

3838:

a sexual relationship between two people who are not married to each other

3530:

until its size exceedes 200kB, at which point threads will be archived to

1646:

the book; it shouldn't recite the entire story. If you want to know what

1355: 1261: 281: 1408:

Maybe we (i.e., you) need to remove the reference to this book from the

3844:

Shelly was committing an affair with Mary (he was married; she was not)

3811:, apparently an attempt to represent some of the German pronunciation. 998: 899:

So you would concur with delisting and renomination when appropriate?--

2886:"Occult" is here probably meant in the sense described in the article 2525:

by John Polidori and Prometheus' influence on Percy Shelley to write

2972: 2887: 1225:

First stab at style/themes taken from the Broadview edition and the

4068:

save it for the section specifically on the subject, not the lead.

3094:, this entry could have waited until the movie actually existed. -- 3284:

https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/frankenstein/exhibition2s0.html

1586:

In any case, I just adjusted the wording a bit to easy the blame.

530:

Death and the Maidens: Fanny Wollstonecraft and the Shelley Circle

3936:

Why did Shelley use a semicolon in the title instead of a colon?

3460:

Under the heading "Background: Literary influences", it states "

1707:

type disappear from an article sooner or later, and rightly so.

793:

and attempt to bring this article up to the current standards.--

977:"In popular culture" in Knowledge is generally a euphemism for 93:

Please remember that this talk page is intended for discussion

4086: 3340:

magazine just published a special 200th anniversary issue on

2220: 274:

discuss them all, so a redirect is totally inappropriate. For

25: 3373:. I'm down with the flu, will get back to this eventually. -- 3895:

to do more than is written and cited within article already.

2334:

72.148.238.187 (specific request for help with school paper)

3831:

The article currently describes speculation of an affair: "

2591:. Also: "Positive" should be replaced with something like 3604:

possibly also touching on Clairemont and Lord Byron (see

2944:

evidence for the use for the use of the word "occult." --

731:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Novels/19th century task force

362:

as well as its impact on nineteenth-century literature.

4103: 3046:

entry into the universe appears to have been postponed

2964: 1509: 1358:

for replacing the Lauritsen paragraph. Unfortunately,

1248:

as a science fiction novel, drawing on the writings of

424: 216:"popular culture" topic. Move to delete and replace. 2255:

http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/frankenstein/themes.html

1331:

I'm not sure why the above essay has been added here?

3854:

and amid this free love fluid bonding feeding frenzy

143:

Lives of the Most Eminent Literary and Scientific Men

2493:

The dates that are given in the novel are all 17-- (

2069:

There's only three and they do not include Gibbon's

1314:

We can use this list as a way to focus our reading.

784:, I have tagged this article for reassessment. The 555:

Thanks, BB. I used that as a substantial source for

4110:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their 1825:tags on this page without content in them (see the 1465:But the Percy view isn't a minority view - it is a 1183:this bibliography - you read half and I read half? 4101:has been answered. If you need more help, you can 4063:Lead section and references to Castle Frankenstein 2994:I've blocked the editor as a spam-only account. -- 1865:can anyone help me right a paper about this story? 3652:It's not talking about modern Paleoanthropology. 3316:. Shortened misquotes can have quite the life.-- 2939:It's five years late, but in the preface to the 3803:Also, in Chapter 15 the monster reads Goethe, 1296:Creature represents monstrousness of womanhood 3542:me if there's any trouble with this setup. -- 3312:It's possible that it's someone's summary of 8: 2752:The name of this monster is not Frankenstein 482:You need a space between "Archive" and "2". 4102: 3914:How is this sex-life relevant to the book? 2201:I have already requested semi-protection.-- 4126: 3889:Mary Shelley is the author of Frankenstein 3291: 3245: 2612: 2512:Discussion of Percy Shelley and Lord Byron 1232:These themes are listed in broad strokes: 735:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Science Fiction 3206:. No. 10342. London, England. p. 4 – via 739:Knowledge:WikiProject Horror/Notice Board 727:Knowledge:WikiProject Novels/GeneralForum 3344:, making the provocative statement that 1299:Sexual desire, gender, and homosociality 1293:'s thoughts on the virtue of domesticity 748:per discussion with main author below.-- 3467:and the experiments from Luigi Galvani. 3456:Charles Darwin NOT a literary influence 3190: 1949:Removed reference to the monster's name 1236:Birth myth, reproduction, and parenting 4070:2603:6010:11F0:3C0:34D9:F322:9C29:28C6 3986: 3982: 3856:historians suggest an affair occurred‽ 3836:" The typical meaning of "affair" is " 3313: 3031:; edited 18:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC) 2847: 2364:British Critic review of Frankenstein. 1060:Epistolarity/Frame story/Bibliogenesis 520:Thanks for the invitation to join in, 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3424:-- is not included on the article... 3395:The editorial is also in the clear. 7: 3834:Shelley child may have been a Byron. 2685: 2576:and should be removed or rewritten. 789:The concerned editors should review 2018:A failed artificial life experiment 1817: 3981:Heh..Shakespeare also wrote "has" 3416:Darwin not mentioned as influence? 2975:link already existing. Seems like 1529: 24: 3592: 3366:, editorial by Henk van den Belt 3342:"The long shadow of Frankenstein" 498:Thank you - I have fixed it now. 4090: 2686: 2224: 1077:Homosocial and homoerotic desire 90:, such material will be removed. 29: 4184:to ask someone for assistance. 3955:Twelfth Night, or What You Will 3286:). There is no such reference. 3198:Staff writer (1 January 1818). 2217:Edit request on 7 December 2011 1097:Frankenstein in popular culture 957:Frankenstein in popular culture 429:University of Pennsylvania site 75:Archiving, analysis, discussion 3688:Comparative lit? Ill placed. 2785:) 01:05, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 2127:00:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 263:22:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 249:22:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 4078:19:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC) 3973:14:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 3768:05:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC) 3683:17:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC) 3579:23:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC) 3479:11:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC) 3451:17:06, 11 December 2018 (UTC) 3223:"Films, plays and television" 3178:18:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 3029:17:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC) 3008:17:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC) 2989:17:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC) 2726:23:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC) 2627:17:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC) 2401:Plot Summary Hopelessly Inept 2048: 1907:Why is Alchemy not mentioned? 1859:19:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 1786:20:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 1525:04:06, 28 December 2009 (UTC) 1499:23:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1480:23:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1461:22:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 1341:21:58, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 1322:) 16:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 1211:15:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1193:13:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1178:19:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 1159:15:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 1141:11:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 1117:18:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1011:09:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC) 387:05:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC) 372:14:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 354:08:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 339:07:56, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 323:07:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 130:and I have already completed 4209:21:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 4194:18:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 4145:18:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3805:The Sorrows of Young Werther 3662:15:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC) 3621:08:03, 28 January 2019 (UTC) 3607:History of a Six Weeks' Tour 3595:section above, and notes at 3552:05:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC) 3517:19:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC) 3434:15:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC) 3143:"only this and nothing more" 3104:22:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 3082:22:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 3060:22:01, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 2813:06:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 2797:05:29, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 2704:13:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC) 2664:22:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC) 2648:19:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC) 2607:08:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 2550:04:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC) 2489:08:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 2396:20:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 2376:I would translate this as: 2359:15:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 2284:02:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 2269:19:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 2211:01:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 2196:01:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 2173:Protection or semiprotection 2161:15:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 2075:The Sorrows of Young Werther 2044:15:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 2012:02:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC) 1990:23:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 1970:22:10, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 1943:21:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 1808:05:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC) 1692:19:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1675:19:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1660:08:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 1610:02:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 1596:22:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1582:22:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1567:19:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1548:19:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1034:Composition and publication 991:08:11, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 463:I've created a new archive, 453:00:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 437:23:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 419:Elizabeth: cousin or sister? 414:23:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 291:02:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 205:08:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 161:History of a Six Weeks' Tour 4114:, or consider visiting the 4057:13:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC) 3946:23:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC) 3708:Pygmalion_(play) influence? 3522:Ok, absent objections I've 3484:Set up automatic archiving? 3156:20:50, 31 August 2015 (UTC) 2954:18:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 2479:Ritter, who died in 1810.) 2247:to reactivate your request. 2235:has been answered. Set the 231:Minor brouhaha over spacing 226:20:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC) 182:15:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 168:was going to help out with 111:03:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 4225: 3723:00:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC) 3326:12:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC) 3306:08:43, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 3200:"Books Published This Day" 3127:21:17, 13 April 2013 (UTC) 2969:Trump: The Art of the Deal 2507:16:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC) 2430:09:43, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 2415:08:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 1901:03:47, 25 April 2011 (UTC) 1885:02:28, 25 April 2011 (UTC) 465:Talk:Frankenstein/Archive2 3924:20:52, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 3910:01:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 3882:14:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 3821:20:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 3703:09:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC) 3647:19:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC) 3383:19:27, 12 June 2018 (UTC) 3260:15:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 3240:17:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC) 2933:09:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 2881:02:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 2746:00:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC) 1922:00:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 1748:04:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 1732:16:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 1717:00:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 1074:Enlightenment/Romanticism 941:15:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 927:14:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 895:14:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 876:22:59, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 843:08:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 821:23:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC) 776:22:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 627:15:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 3798:11:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC) 3742:00:38, 26 May 2019 (UTC) 3507:would be appreciated! -- 3411:18:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 2862:20:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC) 2831:22:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 2472:06:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 2450:06:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 2105:20:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 2087:20:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 2073:. The third is Goethe's 2064:19:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 1702:Removed Analysis section 1436:02:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 1422:16:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 1404:05:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 1377:05:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 972:14:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 612:14:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 593:03:27, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 575:Draft - live or sandbox? 569:01:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 550:15:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 508:02:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 494:20:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 477:19:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 4029:03:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC) 3999:03:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC) 3164:, the publication date 2049:Monster's Reading List? 1637:12:41, 8 May 2010 (UTC) 1080:Mourning and melancholy 1068:Reproduction/Motherhood 1028:Biographical background 211:Popular culture section 1642:The article should be 1530:"Whale's" Frankenstein 825:Incidentally, I think 532:. Profile Books, 2007. 399:Significant plot holes 296:1st paragraph analysis 3868:I suggest replacing " 3627:Badly worded sentence 3364:Frankenstein lives on 3266:"Adam of your labors" 3086:Arguably, that was a 3044:Bride of Frankenstein 3038:Bride of Frankenstein 1127:and introductions to 647:Talk:Frankenstein/GA1 42:of past discussions. 4105:ask another question 3667:There is also this: 3090:. And if there's no 2979:would apply here. -- 1948: 1410:Percy Bysshe Shelley 1347:The Woman Who Wrote 1242:as a Godwinian novel 1021:Initial suggestion: 4035:sapient vs sentient 3809:English translation 2299:main article space 1510:removed the section 1394:of the worst kind. 1291:Mary Wollstonecraft 1227:Cambridge Companion 1125:Cambridge Companion 1083:Imperialism/Slavery 1071:Feminism/Birth myth 641:This discussion is 489:robe and wizard hat 3392:. And the second, 3349:what it should do. 3112:Age when published 2756:From the article: 2682:Young Frankenstein 2527:Prometheus Unbound 2436:Late 18th century? 1326:theme of addiction 1048:Styles and genres 4178:live help channel 4176:, or Knowledge's 4147: 4131:comment added by 4122: 4121: 4107:on your talk page 3571: 3566: 3558:Potential rewrite 3308: 3296:comment added by 3262: 3250:comment added by 2787: 2773:comment added by 2629: 2617:comment added by 2572:? This remark is 2553: 2536:comment added by 2462:comment added by 2442:Undead Herle King 2251: 2250: 2148: 2031: 2002:comment added by 1960:comment added by 1933:comment added by 1875:comment added by 1849:comment added by 1798:comment added by 1789: 1772:comment added by 1302:Critique of both 1270:as a Gothic novel 1051:Gothic and horror 925: 874: 819: 774: 492: 434:The Parting Glass 304:A couple of links 195:comment added by 108: 96:about the article 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:Talk:Frankenstein 4216: 4171: 4165: 4161: 4155: 4109: 4094: 4087: 3902: 3899: 3734: 3731: 3695: 3692: 3637:eat vegetables. 3590: 3576: 3569: 3564: 3541: 3524:set up archiving 3215: 3214: 3195: 3138: 3078: 3076: 3005: 3000: 2839:Mismatched Parts 2786: 2767: 2743: 2738: 2700: 2698: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2589:critical opinion 2552: 2530: 2474: 2242: 2238: 2228: 2227: 2221: 2146: 2029: 2014: 1972: 1945: 1887: 1861: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1824: 1810: 1788: 1766: 1523: 1518: 1208: 1203: 1175: 1170: 1156: 1151: 1114: 1109: 903: 852: 797: 752: 741: 609: 604: 486: 425:this recent edit 207: 107: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4224: 4223: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4169: 4163: 4159: 4153: 4085: 4065: 4037: 4009: 3934: 3900: 3897: 3829: 3786:Siege of Oxford 3782:Ruins of Empire 3775: 3749: 3732: 3729: 3710: 3693: 3690: 3671: 3629: 3584: 3574: 3560: 3535: 3486: 3458: 3418: 3334: 3268: 3225: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3197: 3196: 3192: 3132: 3114: 3074: 3072: 3040: 3003: 2996: 2971:), despite the 2962: 2925:Hans Dunkelberg 2869: 2841: 2789:Pithecanthropus 2775:Pithecanthropus 2768: 2754: 2741: 2734: 2714: 2696: 2694: 2687: 2635: 2568:Interesting to 2559: 2531: 2514: 2457: 2438: 2403: 2366: 2292: 2240: 2236: 2225: 2219: 2175: 2159: 2051: 2042: 2020: 1997: 1955: 1951: 1928: 1909: 1870: 1867: 1844: 1838: 1822: 1820: 1818: 1793: 1767: 1756: 1704: 1624: 1536:John Balderston 1532: 1516: 1513: 1506: 1412:article, then. 1352: 1328: 1230: 1206: 1199: 1173: 1166: 1154: 1147: 1112: 1105: 1054:Science fiction 1019: 1017:Working outline 959: 780:As part of the 654: 637: 635:GA Reassessment 607: 600: 577: 518: 461: 421: 401: 306: 298: 271: 233: 213: 190: 77: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4222: 4220: 4212: 4211: 4196: 4172:, stop by the 4157:help me-helped 4120: 4119: 4112:user talk page 4095: 4084: 4083:Original story 4081: 4064: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4036: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4008: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3976: 3975: 3965:ImaginesTigers 3952:Shakespeare's 3933: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3874:49.180.147.255 3852: 3851: 3848: 3845: 3828: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3774: 3771: 3748: 3745: 3709: 3706: 3669: 3665: 3664: 3634: 3633: 3628: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3559: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3485: 3482: 3465:Charles Darwin 3457: 3454: 3439:Charles Darwin 3422:Erasmus Darwin 3417: 3414: 3398: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3351: 3350: 3333: 3332:Legacy section 3330: 3329: 3328: 3267: 3264: 3224: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3208:Newspapers.com 3189: 3188: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3113: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3039: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 2961: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2936: 2935: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2907: 2906: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2892: 2891: 2868: 2865: 2840: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2816: 2815: 2753: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2713: 2712:Fantasy novel? 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2667: 2666: 2634: 2633:Pronunciation? 2631: 2558: 2555: 2513: 2510: 2476: 2475: 2464:67.166.167.126 2437: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2402: 2399: 2365: 2362: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340:69.171.160.136 2338: 2337:72.148.238.187 2335: 2332: 2331:97.112.138.151 2329: 2326: 2323: 2320: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311:67.162.130.250 2309: 2306: 2305:72.175.124.221 2303: 2291: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2259: 2249: 2248: 2229: 2218: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2174: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2151: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2090: 2089: 2050: 2047: 2034: 2019: 2016: 1993: 1992: 1950: 1947: 1914:142.177.31.222 1908: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1877:72.148.238.187 1866: 1863: 1851:141.44.196.176 1837: 1836:Interpretation 1834: 1800:71.161.133.238 1755: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1703: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1623: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1531: 1528: 1505: 1502: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1351: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1327: 1324: 1312: 1311: 1300: 1297: 1294: 1284: 1278:William Godwin 1271: 1265: 1250:Erasmus Darwin 1243: 1237: 1229: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1084: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1018: 1015: 1014: 1013: 994: 993: 958: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 778: 652: 651: 636: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 576: 573: 572: 571: 534: 533: 517: 516:Another source 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 460: 457: 456: 455: 420: 417: 400: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 305: 302: 297: 294: 270: 267: 266: 265: 232: 229: 212: 209: 187: 186: 185: 184: 124:featured topic 114: 113: 91: 81: 76: 73: 70: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4221: 4210: 4206: 4202: 4197: 4195: 4191: 4187: 4183: 4179: 4175: 4168: 4158: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4117: 4113: 4108: 4106: 4100: 4096: 4093: 4089: 4088: 4082: 4080: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4062: 4058: 4054: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4034: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4021:Firejuggler86 4018: 4017: 4016: 4014: 4006: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3991:Firejuggler86 3989:. *shrug* :) 3988: 3984: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3957: 3956: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3938:Wolf O'Donnel 3931: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3866: 3864: 3858: 3857: 3849: 3846: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3839: 3835: 3826: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3780: 3772: 3770: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3760:SiberianDante 3758: 3754: 3746: 3744: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3725: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3707: 3705: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3685: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3668: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3631: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3609: 3608: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3593:#Reading list 3588: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3577: 3572: 3567: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3539: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3493: 3489: 3483: 3481: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3466: 3455: 3453: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3415: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3399: 3396: 3394: 3391: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3343: 3339: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3287: 3285: 3279: 3278: 3274: 3271: 3265: 3263: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3252:148.129.71.40 3249: 3242: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3228: 3222: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3194: 3191: 3187: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3144: 3136: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3111: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3080: 3079: 3069: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3037: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3016: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3006: 3001: 2999: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2942: 2938: 2937: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2921: 2915: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2903: 2902: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2866: 2864: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2850: 2849: 2845: 2838: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2751: 2747: 2744: 2739: 2737: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2711: 2705: 2702: 2701: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2632: 2630: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2619:97.80.113.249 2616: 2609: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2594: 2590: 2584: 2582: 2577: 2575: 2574:Point-Of-View 2571: 2566: 2564: 2556: 2554: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2528: 2524: 2519: 2511: 2509: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2499:66.168.24.216 2496: 2491: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2400: 2398: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2383: 2380: 2377: 2374: 2372: 2363: 2361: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2347: 2339: 2336: 2333: 2330: 2327: 2324: 2322:65.100.177.76 2321: 2318: 2317: 2315: 2310: 2308:75.105.47.191 2307: 2304: 2301: 2300: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2290:School Papers 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2257: 2256: 2246: 2243:parameter to 2234: 2230: 2223: 2222: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2180:Mike Christie 2172: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2119:184.35.102.31 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2025: 2017: 2015: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004:74.56.171.184 2001: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1978:Paradise Lost 1975: 1974: 1973: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1962:74.56.171.184 1959: 1946: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1935:74.56.171.184 1932: 1924: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1864: 1862: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1841: 1835: 1833: 1828: 1815: 1811: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1790: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1774:Omegamormegil 1771: 1763: 1760: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1709:74.47.159.160 1701: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1629:66.248.168.65 1622:The addiction 1621: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1520: 1519: 1511: 1503: 1501: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453:88.77.181.215 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1365:User:Awadewit 1361: 1360:User:Awadewit 1357: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1323: 1321: 1317: 1309: 1308:Enlightenment 1305: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1292: 1288: 1285: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1272: 1269: 1266: 1263: 1259: 1258:Humphrey Davy 1255: 1254:Luigi Galvani 1251: 1247: 1244: 1241: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1228: 1224: 1212: 1209: 1204: 1202: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1171: 1169: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1152: 1150: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1115: 1110: 1108: 1096: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1064: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1047: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 995: 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 975: 974: 973: 969: 965: 956: 942: 938: 934: 930: 929: 928: 923: 919: 915: 911: 907: 902: 898: 897: 896: 892: 888: 884: 879: 878: 877: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 851: 846: 845: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 823: 822: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 796: 792: 787: 783: 779: 777: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 751: 747: 744: 743: 742: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 721: 718: 714: 710: 707: 704: 700: 696: 693: 690: 686: 682: 679: 676: 672: 671:Ed Fitzgerald 668: 665: 662: 658: 650: 648: 644: 639: 638: 634: 628: 624: 620: 615: 614: 613: 610: 605: 603: 597: 596: 595: 594: 590: 586: 582: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 553: 552: 551: 547: 543: 539: 531: 528:Todd, Janet. 527: 526: 525: 523: 515: 509: 505: 501: 497: 496: 495: 490: 485: 481: 480: 479: 478: 474: 470: 466: 458: 454: 450: 446: 441: 440: 439: 438: 435: 430: 426: 418: 416: 415: 411: 407: 398: 388: 384: 380: 375: 374: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 356: 355: 351: 347: 342: 341: 340: 336: 332: 327: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 313: 310: 303: 301: 295: 293: 292: 288: 284: 283: 277: 268: 264: 261: 260: 259: 258:Ed Fitzgerald 253: 252: 251: 250: 247: 246: 245: 244:Ed Fitzgerald 237: 230: 228: 227: 223: 219: 218:Sterlingjones 210: 208: 206: 202: 198: 197:60.240.34.234 194: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 162: 157: 156: 151: 150: 145: 144: 139: 138: 133: 129: 125: 122: 118: 117: 116: 115: 112: 109: 105: 103: 102:Ed Fitzgerald 98: 97: 92: 89: 88: 82: 79: 78: 74: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4162:back into a 4127:— Preceding 4123: 4104: 4099:help request 4066: 4045:Homo sapiens 4044: 4038: 4010: 4007:Letters date 3960: 3953: 3935: 3888: 3869: 3867: 3859: 3855: 3853: 3832: 3830: 3804: 3781: 3776: 3750: 3726: 3711: 3686: 3672: 3666: 3639:93.139.17.24 3635: 3605: 3601:Frankenstein 3600: 3561: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3494: 3490: 3487: 3464: 3461: 3459: 3437: 3419: 3403:Pete Tillman 3400: 3397: 3388: 3375:Pete Tillman 3360:Craig Venter 3356:James Watson 3352: 3337: 3335: 3298:73.60.98.219 3292:— Preceding 3288: 3280: 3275: 3272: 3269: 3246:— Preceding 3243: 3229: 3226: 3211: 3203: 3193: 3185: 3165: 3141: 3115: 3070: 3048:indefinitely 3043: 3042:The planned 3041: 3017:, I suppose. 3013: 2997: 2963: 2960:epublib.info 2870: 2851: 2846: 2842: 2769:— Preceding 2764: 2758: 2757: 2755: 2735: 2715: 2692: 2677: 2673: 2636: 2613:— Preceding 2610: 2597: 2592: 2588: 2585: 2580: 2578: 2573: 2569: 2567: 2562: 2560: 2532:— Preceding 2526: 2522: 2518:Frankenstein 2517: 2515: 2494: 2492: 2477: 2439: 2404: 2384: 2381: 2378: 2375: 2369: 2367: 2348: 2345: 2328:198.49.6.225 2302:Georgievski1 2293: 2258: 2252: 2244: 2233:edit request 2176: 2074: 2071:Roman Empire 2070: 2052: 2023: 2021: 1998:— Preceding 1994: 1977: 1956:— Preceding 1952: 1929:— Preceding 1925: 1910: 1868: 1842: 1839: 1823:<ref: --> 1819:Cite error: 1816: 1812: 1791: 1764: 1761: 1757: 1720: 1705: 1648:Frankenstein 1647: 1643: 1625: 1533: 1514: 1507: 1504:Daniel Walls 1488: 1392:WP:RECENTISM 1384:Frankenstein 1383: 1353: 1349:Frankenstein 1348: 1313: 1287:Frankenstein 1286: 1274:Frankenstein 1273: 1268:Frankenstein 1267: 1246:Frankenstein 1245: 1240:Frankenstein 1239: 1231: 1226: 1200: 1167: 1148: 1129:Frankenstein 1128: 1124: 1106: 1102: 1043:1831 edition 1040:1818 edition 1031:Plot summary 1020: 978: 960: 901:TonyTheTiger 850:TonyTheTiger 795:TonyTheTiger 750:TonyTheTiger 745: 719: 705: 691: 677: 663: 653: 640: 601: 581:Frankenstein 580: 578: 538:Frankenstein 537: 535: 529: 519: 484:Doctorfluffy 462: 422: 402: 379:80.202.40.85 360:Frankenstein 359: 346:80.202.40.85 307: 299: 280: 276:Frankenstein 275: 272: 256: 255: 242: 241: 238: 234: 214: 188: 170:Frankenstein 169: 159: 153: 147: 141: 135: 132:Mary Shelley 121:Mary Shelley 106: 101: 95: 94: 86: 85: 65: 43: 37: 3898:Jennablurrs 3730:Jennablurrs 3691:Jennablurrs 3587:TheJoebro64 3318:tronvillain 3170:tronvillain 3096:tronvillain 3092:WP:DEADLINE 3068:WP:DEADLINE 3052:tronvillain 3021:tronvillain 2998:Laser brain 2981:tronvillain 2946:tronvillain 2873:86.183.2.37 2854:tronvillain 2823:51.9.120.87 2736:Laser brain 2557:"Reception" 2523:The Vampyre 2458:—Preceding 2325:Heatherrusk 2097:69.209.52.8 2056:69.209.52.8 1871:—Preceding 1845:—Preceding 1794:—Preceding 1768:—Preceding 1680:Laser brain 1554:Laser brain 1354:Thank you, 1304:Romanticism 1201:Laser brain 1168:Laser brain 1149:Laser brain 1107:Laser brain 1037:Composition 1003:WesleyDodds 883:Laser brain 831:Laser brain 643:transcluded 602:Laser brain 557:Fanny Imlay 459:New archive 191:—Preceding 166:Laser brain 36:This is an 4013:WikiSource 3532:/Archive 3 3528:/Archive 2 3505:don't care 3503:, or even 3232:Wanderer57 3186:References 2316:Talk page 2237:|answered= 1821:There are 1667:Canonblack 1540:Canonblack 1439:through's! 1282:radicalism 1276:critiques 918:WP:CHICAGO 867:WP:CHICAGO 812:WP:CHICAGO 767:WP:CHICAGO 655:Notified: 542:BrainyBabe 423:Regarding 269:Characters 155:Proserpine 4182:help desk 4180:, or the 4133:Janosabel 3961:alternate 3932:Semicolon 3916:Errantius 3863:unmarried 3813:Errantius 3715:DaviddesJ 3495:Opinions 3471:Bricology 3204:The Times 3088:month ago 2973:Gutenberg 2914:galvanism 2867:Galvanism 2718:Taeyebaar 2656:Willondon 2599:TheScotch 2593:favorable 2481:TheScotch 2388:Anonywiki 2351:WickerGuy 2319:Danny7779 2276:WickerGuy 2203:WickerGuy 2079:WickerGuy 1982:WickerGuy 1893:WickerGuy 1827:help page 1740:A dullard 1652:TheScotch 1467:WP:FRINGE 1289:embraces 1091:Reception 983:TheScotch 782:GA Sweeps 657:Stbalbach 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 4186:Primefac 4174:Teahouse 4141:contribs 4129:unsigned 4116:Teahouse 4049:Khajidha 3779:Volney's 3755:prefix. 3753:franken- 3654:AnonMoos 3591:See the 3426:AnonMoos 3294:unsigned 3248:unsigned 3230:Thanks, 3160:As seen 2905:sentence 2805:SQGibbon 2783:contribs 2771:unsigned 2640:Malick78 2615:unsigned 2546:contribs 2538:Lisaraub 2534:unsigned 2460:unsigned 2422:Some guy 2407:Orthotox 2386:stated. 2188:contribs 2000:unsigned 1958:unsigned 1931:unsigned 1873:unsigned 1847:unsigned 1796:unsigned 1782:contribs 1770:unsigned 1684:Awadewit 1602:Awadewit 1559:Awadewit 1491:Critic11 1472:Awadewit 1428:Awadewit 1396:Awadewit 1388:WP:UNDUE 1356:User:StN 1316:Awadewit 1310:thinking 1262:vitalism 1185:Awadewit 1133:Awadewit 964:Awadewit 933:Awadewit 887:Awadewit 827:Awadewit 791:WP:WIAGA 746:Delisted 723:contribs 709:contribs 695:contribs 685:Awadewit 681:contribs 667:contribs 619:Awadewit 585:Awadewit 561:Awadewit 522:Awadewit 500:Awadewit 469:Awadewit 445:Awadewit 364:Awadewit 331:Awadewit 193:unsigned 174:Awadewit 104:(unfutz) 4201:MrOllie 4167:help me 3963:title. 3501:against 3401:WiP, -- 3338:Science 3015:WP:SPAM 2977:WP:ELNO 2672:That's 2420:Fixed. 2261:Mjpayce 2192:library 1508:I just 1414:Syzygos 1369:Syzygos 1333:Шизомби 1094:Legacy 1086:Marxism 1065:Themes 1057:Sublime 999:Vampire 922:WP:LOTM 871:WP:LOTM 848:July.-- 816:WP:LOTM 786:WP:LEAD 771:WP:LOTM 406:Tserton 137:Maurice 39:archive 3827:Affair 3790:MFlet1 3773:Period 3747:Legacy 3675:Romi56 3673:What? 3597:/Notes 3443:Romi56 3336:Since 3148:Thnidu 3004:(talk) 2888:Occult 2760:error. 2742:(talk) 2678:shteen 1754:Golem? 1517:JHMM13 1264:debate 1207:(talk) 1174:(talk) 1155:(talk) 1113:(talk) 979:trivia 713:Mervyn 608:(talk) 158:, and 128:Qp10qp 4097:This 3893:WP:OR 3613:Xover 3544:Xover 3509:Xover 3077:pIron 2699:pIron 2680:... ( 2674:FRONK 2579:Re: " 2561:Re: " 2371:(438) 2241:|ans= 2231:This 1724:Tdslk 1644:about 835:Xover 645:from 314:, or 149:Midas 16:< 4205:talk 4190:talk 4137:talk 4074:talk 4053:talk 4025:talk 3995:talk 3983:ha's 3969:talk 3942:talk 3920:talk 3906:talk 3901:7575 3878:talk 3817:talk 3794:talk 3764:talk 3738:talk 3733:7575 3719:talk 3699:talk 3694:7575 3679:talk 3658:talk 3643:talk 3617:talk 3548:talk 3538:ping 3513:talk 3475:talk 3447:talk 3430:talk 3407:talk 3379:talk 3322:talk 3302:talk 3256:talk 3236:talk 3174:talk 3166:does 3162:here 3152:talk 3146:. -- 3135:Xous 3123:talk 3119:Xous 3100:talk 3056:talk 3025:talk 2985:talk 2965:Here 2950:talk 2941:1831 2929:talk 2877:talk 2858:talk 2827:talk 2809:talk 2793:talk 2779:talk 2722:talk 2676:-en- 2660:talk 2644:talk 2623:talk 2603:talk 2570:whom 2542:talk 2503:talk 2485:talk 2468:talk 2446:talk 2426:talk 2411:talk 2392:talk 2355:talk 2280:talk 2265:talk 2207:talk 2184:talk 2157:cont 2153:talk 2123:talk 2101:talk 2083:talk 2060:talk 2040:cont 2036:talk 2024:fail 2008:talk 1986:talk 1966:talk 1939:talk 1918:talk 1897:talk 1881:talk 1855:talk 1804:talk 1778:talk 1744:talk 1728:talk 1713:talk 1688:talk 1671:talk 1656:talk 1633:talk 1606:talk 1592:talk 1588:Wrad 1578:talk 1574:Wrad 1563:talk 1544:talk 1495:talk 1476:talk 1457:talk 1432:talk 1418:talk 1400:talk 1390:and 1373:talk 1337:talk 1320:talk 1306:and 1256:and 1189:talk 1137:talk 1025:Lead 1007:talk 987:talk 968:talk 937:talk 891:talk 839:talk 829:and 717:talk 703:talk 699:Wrad 689:talk 675:talk 661:talk 623:talk 589:talk 565:talk 546:talk 504:talk 473:talk 449:talk 410:talk 383:talk 368:talk 350:talk 335:talk 319:talk 287:talk 222:talk 201:talk 178:talk 3987:Ile 3570:BRO 3565:JOE 3497:for 3073:Scr 2695:Scr 2583:": 2565:": 2495:sic 2239:or 2190:- 2077:.-- 1980:.-- 1280:'s 914:bio 863:bio 808:bio 763:bio 725:), 711:), 697:), 683:), 669:), 317:? ( 282:DGG 4207:) 4192:) 4170:}} 4164:{{ 4160:}} 4154:{{ 4143:) 4139:• 4076:) 4055:) 4027:) 3997:) 3971:) 3944:) 3922:) 3908:) 3880:) 3819:) 3796:) 3766:) 3740:) 3721:) 3701:) 3681:) 3660:) 3645:) 3619:) 3575:64 3550:) 3540:}} 3536:{{ 3515:) 3499:, 3477:) 3449:) 3432:) 3409:) 3381:) 3324:) 3304:) 3258:) 3238:) 3210:. 3202:. 3176:) 3154:) 3125:) 3102:) 3058:) 3027:) 3019:-- 2987:) 2952:) 2931:) 2879:) 2860:) 2829:) 2811:) 2795:) 2781:• 2732:-- 2724:) 2684:) 2662:) 2646:) 2625:) 2605:) 2595:. 2548:) 2544:• 2505:) 2487:) 2470:) 2448:) 2428:) 2413:) 2394:) 2373:" 2357:) 2282:) 2267:) 2245:no 2209:) 2194:) 2186:- 2147:IM 2125:) 2103:) 2085:) 2062:) 2030:IM 2010:) 1988:) 1968:) 1941:) 1920:) 1899:) 1883:) 1857:) 1829:). 1806:) 1784:) 1780:• 1746:) 1730:) 1715:) 1690:) 1673:) 1658:) 1635:) 1608:) 1594:) 1580:) 1565:) 1546:) 1497:) 1478:) 1459:) 1434:) 1420:) 1402:) 1375:) 1339:) 1260:; 1252:, 1191:) 1164:-- 1139:) 1131:. 1009:) 989:) 970:) 939:) 924:) 893:) 873:) 841:) 818:) 773:) 737:, 733:, 729:, 625:) 591:) 567:) 559:. 548:) 506:) 475:) 451:) 412:) 385:) 370:) 352:) 337:) 321:) 311:, 289:) 224:) 203:) 180:) 164:. 152:, 146:, 140:, 126:. 4203:( 4188:( 4135:( 4118:. 4072:( 4051:( 4023:( 3993:( 3967:( 3940:( 3918:( 3904:( 3876:( 3815:( 3792:( 3762:( 3736:( 3717:( 3697:( 3677:( 3656:( 3641:( 3615:( 3589:: 3585:@ 3546:( 3511:( 3473:( 3445:( 3428:( 3405:( 3377:( 3320:( 3300:( 3282:( 3254:( 3234:( 3172:( 3150:( 3137:: 3133:@ 3121:( 3098:( 3075:★ 3054:( 3023:( 2983:( 2948:( 2927:( 2890:: 2875:( 2856:( 2825:( 2807:( 2791:( 2777:( 2720:( 2697:★ 2658:( 2642:( 2621:( 2601:( 2540:( 2501:( 2483:( 2466:( 2444:( 2424:( 2409:( 2390:( 2368:" 2353:( 2278:( 2263:( 2205:( 2182:( 2155:· 2149:p 2145:J 2121:( 2099:( 2081:( 2058:( 2038:· 2032:p 2028:J 2006:( 1984:( 1964:( 1937:( 1916:( 1895:( 1879:( 1853:( 1802:( 1776:( 1742:( 1726:( 1711:( 1686:( 1669:( 1654:( 1631:( 1604:( 1590:( 1576:( 1561:( 1542:( 1493:( 1474:( 1455:( 1430:( 1416:( 1398:( 1371:( 1335:( 1318:( 1187:( 1135:( 1005:( 985:( 966:( 935:( 920:/ 916:/ 912:/ 910:c 908:/ 906:t 904:( 889:( 869:/ 865:/ 861:/ 859:c 857:/ 855:t 853:( 837:( 814:/ 810:/ 806:/ 804:c 802:/ 800:t 798:( 769:/ 765:/ 761:/ 759:c 757:/ 755:t 753:( 720:· 715:( 706:· 701:( 692:· 687:( 678:· 673:( 664:· 659:( 621:( 587:( 563:( 544:( 502:( 491:) 487:( 471:( 447:( 408:( 381:( 366:( 348:( 333:( 285:( 220:( 199:( 176:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index