579:
1426:: It's good that you're here. I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one who finds this misleading. Denmark-Norway has been added and removed for years (apparently) without much explanation, and I can't recall any previous discussion taking place whether it should be included to begin with. The source provided above by Aeengath is interesting, as it clearly states the Danish division in Holstein wasn't even designated for Russia; it was directed against the Swedes in case they would fall upon the rear of the French army (in what is today Germany). For this reason, and other reasons stated below—me and Aeengath are still in a disagreement however—I'd prefer to have Denmark-Norway removed from belligerents, but I'm also fine with a note; the more clarification the better.
935:
lice causing epidemic typhus" * against heat, thirst and diphteria * against hunger and dysentery * against the
Russian army at Smolensk * against Kutuzov at Borodino * against arsonists in Moscow * against the cold * against the Cossacks * against the freezing water of the Berezina. * Napoleon abandons his army * but Ney saves the remaining soldiers." My comment for the previous change was: " ‎As the old collage within the infobox showed the wrong interpretation that General Winter defeated Napoleon, the new collage shows the diseases, the heat and the cold". Now the multiple images template is out of sync. I suggest to take back your last change or find and add a better picture for epidemic typhus. The ugly louse might have killed 100.000 soldiers.
559:
394:
638:
1550:"they were directly engaged as part of the French Grande Armée raised for the invasion of Russia" — I have no idea what you're even saying or how this, somehow, would be in lines with what you said earlier. You want Denmark included in the infobox no matter what, and that's obvious from your vague standpoint. I'm still against it; but with only you and me there can be no consensus and I will take your advice not to engage in edit warring against you. My initial request was for you (or whoever would revert
31:
1462:, so the confusion remains. The two sources seemingly talks about the composition of the Grande Armée and not necessarily the troops which partook in the invasion. Hence my question to you, a French reader: Where was this Danish contingent stationed during the invasion, according to the two sources? Remember, you earlier removed the United Kingdom "since it did not engage directly in the land campaign in Russia", so surely this is of great importance to both me and you. According to
1700:
yes—and once again—that is my POV, my argument for why
Denmark shouldn't be included unless Russia's allies are too (who, likewise, weren't directly involved in Russia). That Sweden was an ally of Russia is already said and sourced in the body. I have my POV, you have yours—we disagree and I accept that, and I'm advising you to do the same. We're evidently unable to convince one another, hence why consensus is needed (as I've already mentioned above).
844:
362:
470:
439:
1547:(hence my subsequent edit), but you want Denmark included despite not even participating in the invasion of Russia; a small Danish corps remained in Holstein for that whole time as both the article (now) and the sources you provided confirms? So, in other words, you're suddenly fine with including nations that weren't even engaged "directly in the land campaign in Russia" but de facto remained quite far away from Russia?
771:
410:
1670:: Denmark–Norway was an ally to France that didn't directly participate in the invasion of Russia, but was tasked with protecting the German states and Denmark (the rear of the French army). Much like the United Kingdom and Sweden, the ones threatening that very rear, were allied to Russia but didn't directly participate in the invasion. It's my opinion that the infobox either include them all, or none.
1107:. Out of curiosity, after my appointment, I devoted a minute to finding out why Google hadn't been working. Then I devoted a few more minutes to figuring out why the (old) version of the article from Redactle was really easy to understand and the (current) version of the article looked like a dishonest student had replaced second other word with a badly chosen synonym and handed it in as his term paper.
378:
247:
787:
85:
64:
716:
480:
95:
22:
628:
319:
308:
297:
286:
275:
607:
205:
169:
1377:
Thanks for joining the discussion. It's true that the Danish contingent were not deployed in combat and were held back in reserve during the campaign, but they were still part of
Napoleon's invading forces and were included in the Grande Armée's order of battle under Marshal Augereau's XI Corps. This
1651:
Ok so if only countries with units crossing into
Russian territory should be considered belligerents, what was the status of Denmark-Norway, given that it contributed a division of 9,436 men raised by levy, included in the order of battle of Napoleon's campaign and tasked with protecting the rear of
1124:
earlier. It's hard for me to imagine that the odds-and-ends of new information that have trickled into the article in the last half year would be more important than the serious damage to readability that Taksen has inflicted on it. But, like I said, I personally think clear writing is important and
1010:
If by "clarity and conciseness" you mean "sounds like it was written by a clueless piece of software trying to imitate a constipated business executive trying to imitate a constipated lawyer," you succeeded. By all other measures, the prose of the article is significantly worse. Please revert it to
934:
was one of the main reasons for this sentence in the lead: "Napoleon lost half of the men because of the extreme weather conditions, disease and hunger". It was not arbitrarily added but in sync with the caption within the infobox: "Napoleon's soldiers enter Russia and have to fight * "against body
1699:
I'm sorry you feel as if I'm ignoring your sources, but I can't recall a single instance where you've shown me a source claiming
Denmark sent troops into Russia to directly participate in its invasion; from my understanding, the Danish division remained in Holstein directed against the Swedes. And
1684:
Well, without sources supporting that statement, it is your pov. For some reason, you have chosen to ignore all the sources I have provided above that say the opposite. Calling
Denmark-Norway an ally but stating they didn't directly participate in the invasion is contradictory when considering the
1094:
It's up to the rest of you how to proceed. Maybe the earlier editors whose writing got carpet-bombed will come back to recreate their years of work. Maybe someone will painstakingly go over the article sentence-by-sentence and replace each of Taksen's edits with its earlier, clearer version. That
973:
helped me a lot to make the article prettier to read. Sentences became more logical and understandable by moving parts around : "Acknowledging the collaborative effort, this article underwent refinement for style enhancement with the assistance of ChatGPT, focusing on improving the language and
1310:
The two sources provided clearly support the presence of a small corps from
Denmark-Norway (under General Eswald, with 9,800 men and 2,000 horses). In this case, the references seems to be included in the infobox because the information does not appear in the body of the article, this follows
1523:
In April 1812, the French demanded the Danes furnish a division of ten thousand men. The levee was then divided into two smaller divisions and placed on both
Holstein and Schleswig. The troops thus raised were to be attached to Napoleon’s XI Corps, under the command of Marshal Pierre
1540:). Whether the Danes were in reserve or marched on Moscow is of no importance here; they were directly engaged with a full division that was part of the French Grande Armée raised for the invasion of Russia, this is now verified by multiple sources.14:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
588:
453:
401:
187:
1613:
Despite not being deployed on
Russian soil, the Danish contingent was part of Napoleon's invading army. This is clearly supported by multiple sources (see my previous posts). Since you're the one who want to remove sourced content from this article maybe start a
1220:
Did
Denmark even participate in this invasion? There's no mention of it in the body of the article. If they didn't participate but are still included in strength, why isn't Sweden added as an ally of Russia? It's at least mentioned in the article.
1632:
My argument was never whether Denmark was part of Napoleon's army of which bulk invaded Russia, but whether Denmark should be included despite not actually invading. You correctly stated: "not being deployed on Russian soil"—and that's my point!
1004:
Napoleon and the Grande Armée were accustomed to utilizing the method of living off the land, which proved successful in the densely populated and agriculturally prosperous regions of central Europe, characterized by a well-connected network of
1378:
formal designation confirms Denmark-Norway's status as an ally and belligerent in the conflict. If you think it's necessary to clarify their non-combatant role with a note, I'm not against it even though it is already mentioned in the body.
369:
179:
1685:
military contribution of a Danish division included in Napoleon's order of battle. Military involvement like protecting the rear of the French army is direct participation in the campaign, regardless of specific territorial crossings.
1098:
I essentially ended up on this page by accident. I sometimes play Redactle, the game that gives you a random Knowledge (XXG) page with most of the words blanked out and you have to guess what the title is. The day Redactle gave me
385:
183:
1082:
When I posted, I hoped that Taksen might realize his non-native intuitions about clear English prose were off-base and he might restore the much better writing of earlier editors. Well, that ain't gonna happen. It seems that
1855:
1590:
You're welcome! And just to be clear: It's YOU who's considering Denmark a belligerent in the invasion; Denmark didn't send any troops into Russia—this is neither claimed by your sources or the Order of battle—since
1407:
1714:
Okay. It appears that you two haven't reached a conclusion. I propose this: That both Denmark-Norway and Grear Britain be added to the infobox, with specific notes explaining their respective involvement. Thoughts?
417:
191:
1850:
1126:
1012:
1084:
568:
449:
1113:
I was actually pretty impressed with the writing in the earlier versions. The prose might not have been 100% perfect, but it was substantially better than in most Knowledge (XXG) articles.
1047:
That very sentence is what led me here to see if anyone else noticed. "leaving the Russians with no alternative but to witness the crumbling state of the invaders" - totally nonsensical!
1536:
This clearly identifies Denmark-Norway as belligerents on the side of the French Empire during the campaign. The UK was not directly involved apart from providing financial support (see
1800:
1454:
First off, neither source is particularly clear or reliable; they're in French (this is English Knowledge (XXG)), written in the 19th century and based upon the personal accounts of
996:
Napoleon and the Grande Armée were used to living off the land, which had worked well in the densely populated and agriculturally rich central Europe with its dense network of roads.
1835:
1543:
Alright, so now you have me confused; you earlier removed the United Kingdom from the infobox because it "did not engage directly in the land campaign in Russia" as stated in your
1356:
the adition, i was unaware of the fact that the Danish contingent did not engage. I find it midleading to include Denmark-Norway if the troops did not participate in actual combat.
1243:
Maybe we should remove some of the images in this article, there is as of now a compact wall of images on the right, from top to bottom, that even overflows into the references. —
1103:
page, I was running short of time because of an upcoming appointment and started cheating — googling for some of the short phrases that had been revealed. And Google was giving me
1845:
1458:
and Eugene Labaume. Secondly, I did raise the question two days ago (see above), with no replies. It's sad to see that you've once again failed to add anything to the body per
694:
260:
217:
1830:
974:
structure without introducing new information. The goal was to ensure clarity and conciseness while maintaining factual accuracy in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines."
1905:
1840:
684:
1569:
1463:
1315:. As a general rule, please do not remove content supported by sources. If you have reliable sources that say differently, start a discussion here instead. Thank you.
1031:
The once-formidable Grande Armée disintegrated into a disordered multitude, leaving the Russians with no alternative but to witness the crumbling state of the invaders
246:
1910:
1880:
1554:) to include Denmark's role in the invasion; you finally did, and now that it's clear they weren't participating at all, I'll settle with that for now. Thank you!
578:
1790:
1890:
1079:
Hey, I'm the same anonymous guy who started this topic. (Not trying to be a sock-puppet. Just too lazy to remember my Knowledge (XXG) account from 20 years ago.)
660:
1488:
I don't think this alone justifies the removal of content. The sources do more than just discuss the composition of the Grande Armée they specifically list the
856:
1785:
1950:
1945:
1940:
1935:
1930:
1925:
1920:
1865:
1915:
35:
1900:
1885:
1825:
1805:
549:
151:
1466:, the Danes remained in Holstein for the duration of the campaign – is this incorrect? You're taking a stance and should thus also give some answers.
651:
612:
212:
174:
1860:
868:
863:
763:
1875:
1815:
1795:
539:
141:
1528:
1820:
221:
1895:
1125:
I'm kind of indifferent to Napoleon. If you're hanging out on this talk page, your priorities may well differ. Discuss amongst yourselves.
515:
117:
1573:
1537:
1455:
1070:
1048:
1038:
1130:
1016:
798:
1406:
According to this source, the Danish division collected on the frontier of Holstein was there to protect the rear of the French army.
1870:
1810:
1576:. Thank you for your cooperation in avoiding edit conflicts, and for engaging in constructive discussion, have a nice week-end!
1780:
511:
493:
444:
108:
69:
44:
1285:
1267:
1248:
1066:
1034:
1116:
You might be better off just reverting the whole thing to the way it was in October or November. Apparently, the editors of
1508:
During the Russian campaign of 1812 and 1813, Denmark provided a contingent of 9,436 men under the orders of General Ewald
1185:
921:
901:
1359:
However, another solution would be to include Denmark-Norway but with a note confirming their limited involvement.
1568:
To keep it simple: Denmark is considered a belligerent because it sent troops, supported by multiple sources, see
1110:
TL;DR: I care a lot about clear writing. But my commitment to the topic of this specific article is close to zero.
950:
New drawing added to get the template in sync. It shows the effect of epidemic typhus to French soldiers in 1813.
1757:
Sorry, but I am not sure why they would be shown as a belligerent and not simply displayed in the units section?
880:
989:
I disagree 100%. In the several changes I looked at, I couldn't find a single one that didn't make the article
498:
50:
1512:
1052:
558:
393:
216:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1485:
1173:
1720:
1397:
1364:
731:
659:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
116:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
742:
1762:
1026:
21:
1157:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
1481:
1163:
1701:
1690:
1671:
1657:
1648:
1634:
1623:
1600:
1581:
1555:
1467:
1459:
1427:
1413:
1383:
1343:
1320:
1307:
1289:
1271:
1252:
1222:
955:
940:
886:
715:
1061:
I've cast it away but I haven't the energy to do much more for this article. Maybe slapping a
656:
1716:
1705:
1675:
1638:
1604:
1559:
1499:
1471:
1431:
1423:
1393:
1374:
1360:
1331:
1226:
1181:
979:
882:
843:
1615:
1758:
927:
756:
1120:(a previous victim of Taksen's attentions) ended up having to revert to the version from
1065:
at the top of the article will suffice for now, but I'm unsure how to proceed. Thoughts?
1599:; the United Kingdom wasn't directly involved and neither was Denmark. And you as well!
1312:
1167:
361:
1766:
1724:
1709:
1694:
1679:
1661:
1642:
1627:
1608:
1585:
1563:
1475:
1435:
1417:
1401:
1387:
1368:
1347:
1324:
1293:
1275:
1256:
1230:
1189:
1134:
1074:
1056:
1042:
1020:
983:
959:
944:
1774:
1686:
1667:
1653:
1619:
1577:
1451:
1409:
1379:
1339:
1316:
1281:
1263:
1244:
1062:
951:
936:
884:
751:
643:
485:
100:
1592:
1572:. The United Kingdom was not directly involved and therefore is not included. See
1502:
did, but to address your concern about the sources age, here are more recent ones:
469:
438:
1177:
975:
1087:
from editing articles for violating WP:OWN and all-round disruptiveness. So he
786:
633:
475:
409:
90:
931:
793:
726:
377:
84:
63:
1596:
1117:
1480:
Non-English references are acceptable as long as they are reliable see
970:
627:
606:
1162:
After the French withdrawal from Germany, Napoleon's remaining ally,
746:
502:
113:
510:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
204:
168:
1091:
reverse his changes, even in the unlikely event he ever wanted to.
1498:
Like I said previously, I didn't make this original edit here, @
1493:
735:
column on 15 April 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
1490:
formations of the Grande Armée raised for the Russian Campaign
887:
837:
781:
710:
15:
1856:
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
769:
577:
557:
408:
392:
376:
360:
245:
792:
A fact from this article was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1851:
B-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
993:
to read. Here's just one example. The original sentence:
655:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
589:
the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force
1551:
1544:
1335:
258:
This article has been checked against the following
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
402:
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
343:
257:
1801:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in History
1392:I would be for adding Denmark-Norway with a note
1464:Order of battle of the French invasion of Russia
1352:Hello! Just to give my perspective.. Despite me
1280:Done, but the lead is still absurdly too big. —
1836:European military history task force articles
1521:
1506:
1484:. While the references in question come from
1262:No one seems to care, going ahead with it. —
895:This page has archives. Sections older than
759:and the beginning of the end for the Emperor?
8:
1011:the version written by actual human beings.
669:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject European history
230:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
1846:French military history task force articles
764:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2004/April
1831:B-Class European military history articles
1171:
601:
433:
340:
254:
163:
58:
1791:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in History
1153:Somehow Denmark was an ally of Napoleon:
1906:Mid-importance European history articles
1841:B-Class French military history articles
210:This article is within the scope of the
1207:Leipzig 1813: The Battle of the Nations
1197:
1127:2604:3D09:A984:A600:8CD3:AE73:BCDC:A735
1013:2604:3D09:A984:A600:9571:6338:EC9A:DC8C
770:
603:
435:
165:
60:
19:
1911:All WikiProject European history pages
1881:Top-importance B-Class Russia articles
1786:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles
1030:
220:. To use this banner, please see the
1916:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles
1891:History of Russia task force articles
762:A record of the entry may be seen at
672:Template:WikiProject European history
233:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
1495:, adding credibility to his account.
1025:I was wondering why the lede was so
649:This article is within the scope of
491:This article is within the scope of
370:European military history task force
106:This article is within the scope of
1753:Rhine Confederation as belligerent?
1538:Russian Army order of battle (1812)
1456:Christian Wilhelm von Faber du Faur
49:It is of interest to the following
1951:Selected anniversaries (June 2021)
1946:Selected anniversaries (June 2019)
1941:Selected anniversaries (June 2016)
1936:Selected anniversaries (June 2015)
1931:Selected anniversaries (June 2012)
1926:Selected anniversaries (June 2011)
1921:Selected anniversaries (June 2010)
1866:Napoleonic era task force articles
1334:the editor that made the original
524:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Russia
386:French military history task force
126:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject France
14:
1901:B-Class European history articles
1886:B-Class Russia (history) articles
1826:B-Class military history articles
1806:B-Class vital articles in History
899:may be automatically archived by
842:
785:
714:
636:
626:
605:
569:the history of Russia task force
478:
468:
437:
317:
306:
295:
284:
273:
203:
167:
93:
83:
62:
29:
20:
1861:B-Class Napoleonic era articles
966:Collaborative Style Improvement
689:This article has been rated as
544:This article has been rated as
146:This article has been rated as
1876:Top-importance Russia articles
1816:Low-importance France articles
1796:B-Class level-4 vital articles
1492:, plus Labaume was a historian
1033:are thorougly unencyclopedic.
725:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1:
1302:Denmark-Norway as belligerent
984:21:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
960:11:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
945:10:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
755:was the turning point in the
663:and see a list of open tasks.
586:This article is supported by
566:This article is supported by
120:and see a list of open tasks.
1821:All WikiProject France pages
1021:17:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
652:WikiProject European history
213:Military history WikiProject
1896:WikiProject Russia articles
527:Template:WikiProject Russia
129:Template:WikiProject France
1967:
1205:Hofschroer, Peter (1993).
1043:20:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
695:project's importance scale
550:project's importance scale
278:Referencing and citation:
152:project's importance scale
1767:16:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1725:15:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1710:13:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1695:12:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1680:11:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1662:10:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1643:01:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1628:17:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1609:15:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1586:15:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1564:14:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1476:11:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
1436:01:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1418:20:24, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1402:20:15, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1388:20:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1369:17:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1348:08:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
1325:07:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
1294:09:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
1276:09:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
1231:10:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
1190:01:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
1067:Ursus arctos californicus
1057:02:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
1035:Ursus arctos californicus
723:French invasion of Russia
688:
675:European history articles
621:
585:
565:
543:
501:dedicated to coverage of
463:
418:Napoleonic era task force
416:
400:
384:
368:
339:
236:military history articles
198:
145:
78:
57:
1257:10:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
1135:07:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
1075:21:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
1871:B-Class Russia articles
1811:B-Class France articles
1574:Russian order of battle
514:, or contribute to the
344:Associated task forces:
289:Coverage and accuracy:
1781:B-Class vital articles
1570:French order of battle
1533:
1517:
1166:, became isolated and
1085:Taksen has been banned
922:AustralopithecusSurfer
902:Lowercase sigmabot III
775:
745:'s defeat in what the
582:
562:
413:
397:
381:
365:
322:Supporting materials:
250:
1168:fell to the coalition
1095:isn't going to be me.
773:
581:
561:
412:
396:
380:
364:
249:
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
36:level-4 vital article
1001:ChatGPT's revision:
505:on Knowledge (XXG).
188:Russian & Soviet
311:Grammar and style:
264:for B-class status:
1652:the French army?
1460:MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE
1290:why I did it wrong
1272:why I did it wrong
1253:why I did it wrong
776:
743:Napoléon Bonaparte
583:
563:
516:project discussion
494:WikiProject Russia
414:
398:
382:
366:
251:
218:list of open tasks
109:WikiProject France
45:content assessment
1529:Mc Intyre, 2021
1192:
1176:comment added by
1029:. Sentences like
909:
908:
874:
873:
834:
833:
780:
779:
709:
708:
705:
704:
701:
700:
657:history of Europe
600:
599:
596:
595:
432:
431:
428:
427:
424:
423:
335:
334:
222:full instructions
162:
161:
158:
157:
1958:
1531:
1515:
1239:Too many images?
1211:
1210:
1202:
1158:Battle of Lyngør
925:
904:
888:
860:
859:
846:
838:
789:
782:
772:
718:
711:
677:
676:
673:
670:
667:
666:European history
646:
641:
640:
639:
630:
623:
622:
617:
613:European history
609:
602:
532:
531:
528:
525:
522:
488:
483:
482:
481:
472:
465:
464:
459:
456:
441:
434:
420:(c. 1792 – 1815)
351:
341:
325:
321:
320:
314:
310:
309:
303:
299:
298:
292:
288:
287:
281:
277:
276:
255:
238:
237:
234:
231:
228:
227:Military history
207:
200:
199:
194:
175:Military history
171:
164:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
96:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
1966:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1771:
1770:
1755:
1526:
1510:
1304:
1241:
1215:
1214:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1151:
968:
928:epidemic typhus
919:
917:
915:Epidemic typhus
900:
889:
883:
851:
774:Knowledge (XXG)
757:Napoleonic Wars
674:
671:
668:
665:
664:
642:
637:
635:
615:
530:Russia articles
529:
526:
523:
520:
519:
508:To participate:
484:
479:
477:
457:
447:
349:
323:
318:
312:
307:
301:
296:
290:
285:
279:
274:
235:
232:
229:
226:
225:
177:
132:France articles
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
99:
94:
92:
72:
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
1964:
1962:
1954:
1953:
1948:
1943:
1938:
1933:
1928:
1923:
1918:
1913:
1908:
1903:
1898:
1893:
1888:
1883:
1878:
1873:
1868:
1863:
1858:
1853:
1848:
1843:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1823:
1818:
1813:
1808:
1803:
1798:
1793:
1788:
1783:
1773:
1772:
1754:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1548:
1534:
1525:
1519:
1509:
1503:
1496:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1357:
1313:MOS:INFOBOXREF
1303:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1213:
1212:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1164:Denmark–Norway
1160:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1096:
1092:
1080:
1008:
1007:
1006:
999:
998:
997:
967:
964:
963:
962:
916:
913:
911:
907:
906:
894:
891:
890:
885:
881:
879:
876:
875:
872:
871:
866:
853:
852:
847:
841:
832:
831:
790:
778:
777:
767:
761:
760:
719:
707:
706:
703:
702:
699:
698:
691:Mid-importance
687:
681:
680:
678:
661:the discussion
648:
647:
631:
619:
618:
616:Mid‑importance
610:
598:
597:
594:
593:
584:
574:
573:
564:
554:
553:
546:Top-importance
542:
536:
535:
533:
506:
490:
489:
473:
461:
460:
458:Top‑importance
442:
430:
429:
426:
425:
422:
421:
415:
405:
404:
399:
389:
388:
383:
373:
372:
367:
357:
356:
354:
352:
346:
345:
337:
336:
333:
332:
330:
328:
327:
326:
315:
304:
293:
282:
268:
267:
265:
252:
242:
241:
239:
208:
196:
195:
192:Napoleonic era
172:
160:
159:
156:
155:
148:Low-importance
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1963:
1952:
1949:
1947:
1944:
1942:
1939:
1937:
1934:
1932:
1929:
1927:
1924:
1922:
1919:
1917:
1914:
1912:
1909:
1907:
1904:
1902:
1899:
1897:
1894:
1892:
1889:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1872:
1869:
1867:
1864:
1862:
1859:
1857:
1854:
1852:
1849:
1847:
1844:
1842:
1839:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1829:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1814:
1812:
1809:
1807:
1804:
1802:
1799:
1797:
1794:
1792:
1789:
1787:
1784:
1782:
1779:
1778:
1776:
1769:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1752:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1650:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1546:
1542:
1541:
1539:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1520:
1516:
1514:
1513:Pigeard, 1993
1504:
1501:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1487:
1486:WP:OLDSOURCES
1483:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1408:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1355:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1330:Also adding @
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1309:
1301:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1238:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1208:
1201:
1198:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1159:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1148:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1090:
1086:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1063:Template:Tone
1060:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1049:70.107.79.187
1046:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1009:
1003:
1002:
1000:
995:
994:
992:
988:
987:
986:
985:
981:
977:
972:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
948:
947:
946:
942:
938:
933:
929:
923:
914:
912:
903:
898:
893:
892:
878:
877:
870:
867:
865:
862:
861:
858:
855:
854:
850:
845:
840:
839:
836:
829:
828:June 24, 2021
825:
824:June 24, 2019
821:
820:June 24, 2016
817:
816:June 24, 2015
813:
812:June 24, 2012
809:
808:June 24, 2011
805:
804:June 24, 2010
801:
800:
795:
791:
788:
784:
783:
768:
765:
758:
754:
753:
752:Patriotic War
748:
744:
740:
737:
736:
734:
733:
728:
724:
720:
717:
713:
712:
696:
692:
686:
683:
682:
679:
662:
658:
654:
653:
645:
644:Europe portal
634:
632:
629:
625:
624:
620:
614:
611:
608:
604:
591:
590:
580:
576:
575:
571:
570:
560:
556:
555:
551:
547:
541:
538:
537:
534:
517:
513:
509:
504:
500:
496:
495:
487:
486:Russia portal
476:
474:
471:
467:
466:
462:
455:
451:
446:
443:
440:
436:
419:
411:
407:
406:
403:
395:
391:
390:
387:
379:
375:
374:
371:
363:
359:
358:
355:
353:
348:
347:
342:
338:
331:
329:
324:criterion met
316:
313:criterion met
305:
302:criterion met
294:
291:criterion met
283:
280:criterion met
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
263:
262:
256:
253:
248:
244:
243:
240:
223:
219:
215:
214:
209:
206:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
176:
173:
170:
166:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
101:France portal
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1756:
1595:remained in
1593:Johann Ewald
1545:edit summary
1522:
1518:(In English)
1507:
1505:(in French)
1489:
1353:
1305:
1242:
1206:
1200:
1172:— Preceding
1152:
1121:
1104:
1100:
1088:
990:
969:
918:
910:
896:
848:
835:
797:
750:
739:Did you know
738:
732:Did you know
730:
722:
721:A fact from
690:
650:
587:
567:
545:
512:project page
507:
492:
259:
211:
147:
107:
51:WikiProjects
34:
1717:Tinkaer1991
1500:Tinkaer1991
1424:Tinkaer1991
1394:Tinkaer1991
1375:Tinkaer1991
1361:Tinkaer1991
1332:Tinkaer1991
802:section on
799:On this day
499:WikiProject
300:Structure:
1775:Categories
1759:Aliy Dawut
1286:what I did
1268:what I did
1249:what I did
1122:four years
930:caused by
1482:WP:NONENG
1354:sourcing
932:body lice
869:Archive 2
864:Archive 1
794:Main Page
749:call the
741:... that
727:Main Page
39:is rated
1687:Aeengath
1668:Aeengath
1654:Aeengath
1620:Aeengath
1597:Holstein
1578:Aeengath
1524:Augereau
1452:Aeengath
1410:Aeengath
1380:Aeengath
1340:Aeengath
1336:addition
1317:Aeengath
1282:Alien333
1264:Alien333
1245:Alien333
1186:contribs
1174:unsigned
1118:Rasputin
1027:peacocky
952:Ruedi33a
937:Ruedi33a
849:Archives
747:Russians
454:Military
261:criteria
180:European
1552:my edit
1373:Hello @
1149:Denmark
1105:nothing
971:ChatGPT
897:60 days
796:in the
729:in the
693:on the
548:on the
450:History
150:on the
41:B-class
1702:Imonoz
1672:Imonoz
1649:Imonoz
1635:Imonoz
1616:WP:RFC
1601:Imonoz
1556:Imonoz
1468:Imonoz
1428:Imonoz
1308:Imonoz
1288:&
1270:&
1251:&
1223:Imonoz
1178:Taksen
1005:roads.
991:uglier
976:Taksen
826:, and
521:Russia
503:Russia
445:Russia
184:French
123:France
114:France
70:France
47:scale.
1089:can't
857:Index
28:This
1763:talk
1721:talk
1706:talk
1691:talk
1676:talk
1658:talk
1639:talk
1624:talk
1605:talk
1582:talk
1560:talk
1472:talk
1432:talk
1414:talk
1398:talk
1384:talk
1365:talk
1344:talk
1321:talk
1227:talk
1182:talk
1131:talk
1101:this
1071:talk
1053:talk
1039:talk
1017:talk
980:talk
956:talk
941:talk
926:The
497:, a
1618:?.
685:Mid
540:Top
142:Low
1777::
1765:)
1723:)
1708:)
1693:)
1678:)
1660:)
1641:)
1626:)
1607:)
1584:)
1562:)
1527:—
1511:—
1474:)
1434:)
1416:)
1400:)
1386:)
1367:)
1346:)
1338:.
1323:)
1292:)
1274:)
1255:)
1229:)
1188:)
1184:•
1170:.
1133:)
1073:)
1055:)
1041:)
1019:)
982:)
958:)
943:)
822:,
818:,
814:,
810:,
806:,
452:/
448::
350:/
190:/
186:/
182:/
178::
1761:(
1719:(
1704:(
1689:(
1674:(
1666:@
1656:(
1647:@
1637:(
1622:(
1603:(
1580:(
1558:(
1470:(
1450:@
1430:(
1422:@
1412:(
1396:(
1382:(
1363:(
1342:(
1319:(
1306:@
1284:(
1266:(
1247:(
1225:(
1209:.
1180:(
1129:(
1069:(
1051:(
1037:(
1015:(
978:(
954:(
939:(
924::
920:@
905:.
830:.
766:.
697:.
592:.
572:.
552:.
518:.
224:.
154:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
