653:
celebrity. (Both
Langlois and Koeslag were invited to contribute to the program, but circumstances prevented either attending the interviews.) The term was also used in one of the episodes of the TV show "The Office". And I have already mentioned Stephen Fry’s QI program. The person who wrote the poem entitled “Koinophilia” (referred to above) had this to say about how he came across the term: "I read about koinophilia in a popular psychology magazine in the U.S. called Psychology Today. But that was years ago and I no longer have the issue or recall the issue#. There are googles of sites referring to the term. There is resistance to the theory of koinophilia because of “political correctness.” But that doesn’t invalidate the term itself. There are religious fanatics who oppose evolution, but not even the most fanatical would deny that the term evolution exists....." I have no idea what is “politically incorrect” about the term “koinophilia” – and, although Judith Langlois assiduously avoids the term, it is nevertheless her work, right from the beginning, that is most commonly associated with the notion of “koinophilia”.
1183:
likely to be associated with mathematics and statistics, and complex formulas, than with biology or physical attraction. "Koinophilia" is the term used for "Averageness" by the general public, and in popular culture. Thus no TV program or popular science discussion would entitle an episode "Averageness", as it sounds, at the very least, uninteresting, and probably mathematically boring. Viewership would fall drastically. It is impossible even to imagine
Stephen Fry asking his QI panel what "Averageness" means. It would have left the panel and audience baffled by its inaneness. Instead "Koinophilia" got a lively and humorous response, and a spike in hits on the Koinophilia article in Knowledge (XXG) last year. So I do not think that redirecting to, or merging the articles under the title of "Averageness" improves, or is in the best interests of Knowledge (XXG)'s usefulness to an inquiring mind.
161:
217:
193:
227:
81:
53:
941:. This page seems to be aboutSexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness, and Facial Neoteny: Cross-cultural Evidence and Implications Doug Jones, C. Loring Brace, William Jankowiak, Kevin N. Laland, Lisa E. Musselman, Judith H. Langlois, Lori A. Roggman, Daniel PĂ©russe, Barbara Schweder and Donald Symons Current Anthropology Vol. 36, No. 5 (Dec., 1995), pp. 723-748 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Stable URL:
320:
137:
22:
1557:
894:
598:
1209:
and think it should be merged; that will mean moving some edited text and citations to the other article, which I hope we can then get to GA status. I have therefore started a formal merger discussion on that article's talk page (we always do such discussions at the proposed destination). I'm in fact
472:
I would agree that there is a problem if an article overly relies on work by a one specific author and is also written by that same author - independent of whether it has been frequently copy-edited by other
Knowledge (XXG) editors. The risk exists that the article will be identified as a neologism -
373:
It is always an awkward question when an article has evolved in this way whether to try to copy-edit one's way to clarity, or to start again from the cited sources. The latter looks like a lot of work but is clean and straightforward, and usually doesn't take more than a few days. I've had a quick go
369:
It is therefore something of a surprise to find that the argument is stated and restated, in something of the style of a Gould essay on a curiosity of evolutionary theory, complete with asides, exceptions, anecdotes and colourful examples. All that's missing is the crisply witty ending. A lot of this
1314:
section of this article seems out of place on a page concerning
Evolutionary biology theory. Though the research described in this section lends an ounce of support for the theory in question, the bulk of it belongs elsewhere. To my eye, this section being so large and high up on the page means it
1178:
The amount of overlap varies considerably, in some it is considerable, others less so, but the repetition of ideas is remarkable. A fair number could easily be merged without any loss of
Knowledge (XXG) informativeness. But each article adds its own flavor, richness and perspective to the topic. In
986:
That's correct. If we are going to merge the two articles, then we need to satisfy ourselves that the merged article contains all that is worth having from both articles, and that the two terms really are "the same". I suspect that on the contrary K. means "averageness in visual appearance" which is
1372:
Also, I've just noticed that the paragraph in the introduction starting 'Koinophilia provides simple explanations for' includes the items 'what constitutes a beautiful face' and 'how the individuality of a face is recognized' which are not in the same sphere as the evolutionary items in the rest of
1187:
after considerable editing of the article to render it more encyclopedic, initiated the GAN process, long before I had any notion as to what "GAN" meant or implied. But it was his idea, and certainly not mine. So here is an independent reader/editor who concludes, from simply judging the article on
1015:
Neither seem at all appropriate at this time, given the above citations; if the topic proves to be indistinguishably close to
Averageness (which we have definitely not established) then a merge would be in order, given that there is material here not found there; if the topic is different, then the
914:
They don't as examples disprove the claim by J8079s that most mentions of the concept use some other term - that's quite a tricky thing to disprove as you'd need a review paper or two, or perhaps an authoritative textbook, which summed up the field as a whole. (Ruby 2011 is not a valid source, it's
689:
Okay, so I trust without detailed review that the sources (Discovery, Office, QI) you've listed all check out. That would give the term borderline notability for its use in popular culture, but give only weak indication to its academic merits. I don't think this question can ultimately be addressed
1182:
The other observation on this topic is that "Koinophilia" has, on average, twice the number of hits than "Averageness" has. As was pointed out on the Talk Page some years ago when the subject was first flighted (and then dropped) is that "Averageness" is an ambiguous, and unexciting term, and more
1505:
The article's notability and separate identity have been agreed, so as you say, the correct course now is to note, neutrally and without prejudice, the arguments for and against the concept, with the evidence that supports them. Any claim added without reliable sources will be removed; everything
1133:
I am slightly at a loss here, regarding the heated arguments concerning merger with "Averageness". Firstly it is one of the strengths of
Knowledge (XXG) (but can on occasions be a bit frustrating) that one can look up almost any topic under the name that raised your curiosity or interest in the
1041:
The term koinophilia derives from the Greek, koinos, "the usual", and philos, "fondness". As a mating strategy it was identified in humans by Judith
Langlois and her coworkers, who found that the average of two human faces was more attractive than either of the faces from which that average was
652:
speculating on whether Helen of Troy's face really launched 1000 ships or whether her face was simply a composite of 1000 women's faces giving her her legendary beauty. There was a program entitled "Koinophilia" on the
Discovery TV channel with Nancy Etcoff (from Harvard University) as guest
1362:
I think it makes the most sense to delete the section entirely. The paragraph in the introduction starting with 'As a mating strategy it was identified in humans by Judith
Langlois' is sufficient mention of the research. All that I suggest to add to that paragraph is a link through to the
1102:
tag is valid but is a "caution and warning" notice, not a roadblock as such. The difference between Averageness and Koinophilia seems very slight if it exists at all, and I'd personally not object to a merge-and-redirect if other editors would like that (this means a fresh
1413:
How ever no one observing a dog in heat or even aware of the enormous variability of human sexual response would find this very convincing. Moreover , this mechanism suffers from the absence of any practical means of actually achieving sexual isolation apart from theory.
637:
Google hits wouldn't surprise me as Knowledge (XXG) unfortunately creates further ripples in the pond. It distorts reality, and that's hard to filter out. I would be happier if we could substantiate that this is a widely used term based on the peer reviewed literature.
1111:. The coverage in this article is more substantial than in Averageness so a merge of the cited materials seems necessary, rather than a simple redirect. The name "Koinophilia" would appear in boldface in the Averageness article as a valid synonym and redirect target.
1069:
there is strong support for this in the talk page archive. Nothing I can find uses the word to mean anything but averageness. That Koeslag extends the theory is reportable at the target page if a source can be found.Knowledge (XXG) is not here to host or review
1325:(Aside: It's possible that the merger conversation has come about because of the confusion this section causes. I intend to comment on discussion of the merger of the Koinophilia and Averageness pages on the Averageness Talk page very shortly)
668:
As was previously noted, an account called Jkoeslag made an edit to their page to redirect to the Oggmus account. You are now referring to Koeslag in the third person. Is the Oggmus account operated by Koeslag or by several people?
960:
Redirecting effectively deletes this article. As this long standing article appears to have a great deal of information not present on other pages, I am re-instating it and suggest further discussion and agreement be sought.
457:
here but the article seems reasonably even-handed on the science, and it is absolutely in order for a Knowledge (XXG) article on a topic to describe its theory and the evidence for and against it, provided that is cited.
1090:
OK, I've now done a little reading around the subject, which definitely doesn't make me an expert. It seems that Koinophilia is a term introduced by Koeslag and used occasionally by other authors, so its use here is not
170:
67:
1619:
Perhaps that grading needs to be revised after a long series of revisions of the article. I have simply left it at C as the least controversial choice; the article has references but has not been assessed further.
1228:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a popularity contest. We don't judge things on whether they make good memes or good marketing. Also, the mere fact that some articles haven't been merged yet, doesn't mean they shouldn't be.
362:
This article has been under development now for 8 years. It is not far from being a Good Article but both the lead and the body read as somewhat essay-like arguments rather than simple encyclopedic descriptions.
621:
It might be worth searching for "koinophilia" on Google put the usage of the term into perspective. It has even been a question on Stephen Fry's BBC programme "QI". (BTW. reference 1 has been cited 30 times).
1134:
subject in the first place. As a result a great many topics are spread over multiple articles. To give one example, "beauty" is duplicated and complemented by the following articles (in no particular order):
127:
1688:
915:
cribbed from here.) I think, though, the other sources are enough to raise sufficient doubt that K is a junior synonym of Averageness to stop any immediate merge pending further investigation.
1698:
1205:
I noted the heat with regret, and can say that I liked the article when I read it, or I wouldn't have spent time copy-editing it. However, I am persuaded that it substantially overlaps with
297:
1065:
Not really the tag I wanted but it will do. The word koinophilia (coined by the creator/major contributor of the article) by means the same as Averageness. This page should re direct to
1254:). "What is the big deal about evolutionary gaps?". In: The Microcosm within: Evolution and Extinction in the Hologenome. Boca Raton, Florida.: Universal Publishers. pp. 177, 395–396.
1708:
287:
1658:
648:
The term "koinophilia" gained considerable popularity amongst the general public during the early 1990's, sparking, for instance, this poem by Richard Fein on the internet entitled
121:
1713:
1322:
page as a destination as there are points made in this section which are not made in the Averageness page and the Averageness page is referenced as this sections main article.
249:
146:
63:
1188:
its inherent merits, that it would "sail through" (or words to that effect) the GAN process. (Chiswick Chap, I hope I am not misquoting or misrepresenting your comments.)
1703:
1693:
1457:
273:
673:
11:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC) Oggmus is Koeslag. I used the third person as the use of the first person would have been confusing when the paragraph is signed "Oggmus".
1001:
A redirect will save the history as opposed to a deletion which will remove it. This appears to be a just rewrite of of the editor's published (or unpublished) work.
240:
198:
97:
1046:
Please re reread the article and substitute the word "averageness" for "koinophilia" also note that none of the sources in the above quote use "koinophilia".
1653:
1042:
derived. The more faces (of the same gender and age) that were used in the averaging process the more attractive and appealing the average face became.
88:
58:
1668:
1179:
Encyclopaedia Britannica this does not occur, which, for me, makes it an entirely useless, boring and a frustrating source of hemi-demi-information.
151:
1673:
1453:
1683:
1407:
175:
744:. (Chapter: What is the big deal about evolutionary gaps?) pp. 395-396. Universal Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida. ISBN 10:1-61233-2773.
1663:
1270:). "How is the individuality of a face recognized?". Journal of Theoretical Biology 261 (3): 469–474. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.08.011.
968:
1430:
1506:
will be checked for neutrality of tone and encyclopedic value. Within those ordinary constraints, by all means expand the article.
987:
certainly not the whole topic and may well be a worthwhile subtopic, I don't know, but it needs investigating before we boldly go.
1520:
Yes well said. A few notes from the source In a positive the theory acknowledges/confirms that evolution is discontinuous however
827:
Apicella C., Little A.C., Marlow F.W. (2006) Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers.
160:
1258:
1593:, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
453:: Jkoeslag and Oggmus have between them made 33.5% of the edits, and have added 40.8% of the content. There is clearly room for
366:
The argument for koinophilia - that extremes are selected against because the average is safer - can be stated in one sentence.
33:
554:
418:
1539:
as a result the theory is "simply insufficient to explain speciation". I trying too to see how to work this into the lead.
1678:
890:
These certainly show that the term is at least in some kind of use (and they need citing in the article if not already).
945:
Page Count: 26 as extended by Koeslage. I am going to boldly re direct this page. Futher work should take place there.
1239:
I quote: "I don't think this question can ultimately be addressed other than through peer-reviewed academic papers.
777:***** NO ***** --- this book "primarily consists of articles available from Knowledge (XXG) or other free sources "
723:
Unnikrishnan M.K. (2012) Koinophilia revisited: the evolutionary link between mate selection and face recognition.
333:
378:
and reuse of the sources would indeed be best. It would be good to see this interesting evolutionary topic at GA.
1373:
the sentence or paragraph so I would delete those as well (or incorporate them the following paragraph perhaps).
342:
757:(Chapter: The enigma of facial beauty). Blackwell Publishing, Chichester, West Sussex. ISBN: 978-1-4051-8192-1.
395:
I think the stuff here should move to a new home "koinophilia" has not caught on as the name for averageness.
39:
1625:
1511:
1295:
1215:
1116:
1021:
992:
972:
920:
508:
383:
964:
450:
1378:
1330:
406:"Sexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness, and Facial Neoteny: Cross-cultural Evidence and Implications "
232:
1306:
Proposal to move the Koinophilia#Averageness and physical attractiveness section to the Averageness page
811:
Alam M., Dover J.S. (2001) On Beauty: Evolution, Psychosocial Considerations, and Surgical Enhancement.
248:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
96:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1340:
Are you thinking of removing the "Physical attractiveness" section completely (heading and all) to the
1315:
is confusing to the reader trying to understand the proposal and intention of the evolutionary idea.
226:
216:
192:
21:
1608:
1621:
1507:
1447:
1291:
1211:
1184:
1112:
1017:
988:
916:
799:(6) 1443-1457. (not 100% certain of this one, as I have been unable to inspect the whole article)
504:
379:
348:
1106:
792:
Otto S.P. (1991) On evolution under sexual and viability selection: a two locus diploid model.
1599:
Grading Koinophilia: grade as sub-B, in fact I think it deserves deletetion, see reasoning at
1427:
1374:
1326:
1255:
586:
566:
93:
1483:
578:
577:
Also, I think that the Introduction section would be better titled something else, since the
477:
in several article titles, but Langlois et al. in none - nor do any of the other references.
279:
1568:
1544:
1490:
1470:
1349:
1287:
1275:
1193:
1078:
1051:
1006:
950:
905:
871:
678:
658:
627:
609:
542:
500:
463:
426:
344:
319:
1590:
1099:
531:
454:
375:
245:
80:
52:
1095:
1071:
557:
in the article; WP:Citation overkill is not always bad, but there is a big case of it in
1641:
Last edited at 10:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC). Substituted at 21:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
1604:
478:
136:
1647:
396:
1344:
page, or leaving behind a very attenuated discussion of what had been there before?
649:
1392:
1240:
1230:
937:
My search at google books and jstor indicate that "koinophilia" means the same as
691:
670:
639:
582:
562:
482:
1105:
discussion, here, with notices at the top of both source and target articles, see
499:
The title is not specially important; what title would you suggest for the topic?
1421:
1564:
1540:
1486:
1466:
1345:
1341:
1319:
1311:
1271:
1206:
1189:
1074:
1066:
1047:
1002:
946:
938:
901:
867:
674:
654:
623:
605:
538:
530:
There is so much work to do that I would be afraid to start. I think your idea
519:
459:
446:
422:
400:
222:
1482:
To put in a more Wiki way we will need to give the critics proper weight per
1418:
The article can stay but the holes must be reported. There are plenty. See
370:
comes from the original IP editor's casting of the article back in 2007.
706:
Unnikrishnan M.K. (2009) How is the individuality of a face recognized?
526:. These subjects are hotly debated in peer review journals but they are
859:
Leopold D.A., Rhodes, G. (2010) A Comparative View of Face Perception.
523:
346:
942:
405:
1391:
Yes, move and merge. For this article, the content seems too broad.
770:. International Book Marketing Service Ltd. ISBN 13: 9786139947881.
374:
at cleanup but am not specially satisfied with the results. Perhaps
1629:
1612:
1572:
1548:
1515:
1494:
1474:
1395:
1382:
1353:
1334:
1299:
1279:
1243:
1233:
1219:
1197:
1120:
1082:
1055:
1025:
1010:
996:
976:
954:
924:
909:
875:
694:
682:
662:
642:
631:
613:
590:
570:
546:
512:
485:
467:
430:
387:
805:
Selection of important articles that cite the Koeslag 1990 paper
1423:
The Microcosm Within: Evolution and Extinction in the Hologenome
742:
The Microcosm within: Evolution and Extinction in the Hologenome
527:
1246:." The following references might therefore be worth reading:
843:
Rhodes G. (2006) The Evolutionary Psychology of facial Beauty.
349:
313:
282:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
278:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
15:
1318:
Therefore I recommend this should be moved, and suggest the
159:
135:
481:
in fact does suggest that no other authors use this word.
813:
Journal of the American Medical Association: Dermatology
1585:
1098:
as there are correctly cited and reliable sources. The
558:
1286:
COULD EVERYONE PLEASE NOTE - MERGER DISCUSSION IS AT
1600:
244:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
92:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1689:
WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology articles
755:
Facial aesthetics. Concepts and clinical diagnosis.
1210:halfway through setting that up, so bear with me.
690:other than through peer-reviewed academic papers.
258:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
126:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1699:C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
1529:beneficial mutations would also not be selected
1409:reviews the theory and shoots it full of holes.
503:of course exists, but this is a narrower topic.
403:This source is what we need to build an article
1589:, and are posted here for posterity. Following
1709:Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
700:Publications that use the term "koinophilia":
1659:Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles
1583:The comment(s) below were originally left at
714:(3), 469–474. doi:10.1016/ j.jtbi.2009.08.011
417:. I think wikipedia is being used to publish
106:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Molecular Biology
8:
1714:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
1456:) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
261:Template:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
962:
187:
47:
473:for instance, Koeslag and co-authors use
171:the Molecular and Cell Biology task force
559:this version of the Introduction section
1704:C-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
1694:All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
449:: Maybe, but the article is cited, and
189:
49:
19:
1445:
1420:Jr., William B. Miller, (2013-12-04).
109:Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology
1532:No concrete means of sexual isolation
522:that could use some work and one for
7:
581:is supposed to be the introduction.
238:This article is within the scope of
86:This article is within the scope of
943:http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744016
38:It is of interest to the following
1654:B-Class Molecular Biology articles
358:Moving towards Good Article status
280:project-independent quality rating
241:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
14:
1591:several discussions in past years
1452:: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
861:Journal of Comparative Psychology
451:has been edited by numerous hands
1669:Mid-importance Genetics articles
1555:
892:
596:
318:
225:
215:
191:
79:
51:
20:
292:This article has been rated as
264:Sexology and sexuality articles
708:Journal of Theoretical Biology
1:
1674:WikiProject Genetics articles
1406:Now the bad news This source
1168:Secondary sex characteristics
252:and see a list of open tasks.
168:This article is supported by
144:This article is supported by
100:and see a list of open tasks.
89:WikiProject Molecular Biology
1630:10:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
1613:06:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
845:Annual Reviews of Psychology
561:; see that first paragraph.
1684:Low-importance MCB articles
1730:
1573:15:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
1549:18:30, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
1516:05:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
1495:01:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
1475:22:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
1396:10:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
1383:15:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
1354:09:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
1335:18:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
1300:11:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
1280:11:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
1244:13:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
1234:10:20, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
1220:08:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
1198:08:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
1121:18:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
1083:22:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
1056:17:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
1026:18:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
1011:18:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
997:14:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
977:21:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
955:19:20, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
925:16:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
910:05:42, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
876:16:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
695:13:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
683:13:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
663:11:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
643:07:49, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
632:07:37, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
614:05:42, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
591:05:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
571:05:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
547:00:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
486:04:34, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
468:00:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
298:project's importance scale
112:Molecular Biology articles
1664:B-Class Genetics articles
1598:
1586:Talk:Koinophilia/Comments
1535:would not apply to plants
1171:Human physical appearance
513:19:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
431:19:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
388:08:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
291:
277:
210:
167:
143:
125:
74:
46:
1426:. Universal-Publishers.
1129:To merge or not to merge
818:(6):795-807. doi:10-1001
1312:Physical Attractiveness
1290:NOT HERE --- THANK YOU
1144:Physical attractiveness
1016:article should remain.
553:There's currently some
147:the Genetics task force
1462:I work very slowly so
1416:
1402:Notability established
1044:
255:Sexology and sexuality
233:Human sexuality portal
199:Sexology and sexuality
164:
140:
28:This article is rated
1411:
1153:Fluctuating asymmetry
1039:
163:
139:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1679:B-Class MCB articles
1266:Unnikrishnan, M.K. (
555:WP:Citation overkill
419:WP:original research
740:Miller W.B. (2013)
518:We have a page for
1579:Assessment comment
1185:User:Chiswick Chap
753:Naini F.B. (2011)
534:is the way to go '
165:
141:
34:content assessment
1639:
1638:
1363:Averageness page.
1162:Female body shape
1147:Sexual attraction
1037:From the article
979:
967:comment added by
766:Ruby C.D. (2011)
355:
354:
312:
311:
308:
307:
304:
303:
186:
185:
182:
181:
103:Molecular Biology
94:Molecular Biology
59:Molecular Biology
1721:
1596:
1595:
1588:
1563:
1559:
1558:
1461:
1451:
1443:
1441:
1439:
900:
896:
895:
834:(12) 1813 – 1820
604:
600:
599:
501:Sexual selection
416:
414:
412:
350:
322:
314:
266:
265:
262:
259:
256:
235:
230:
229:
219:
212:
211:
206:
203:
195:
188:
128:importance scale
114:
113:
110:
107:
104:
83:
76:
75:
70:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1729:
1728:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1644:
1643:
1584:
1581:
1556:
1554:
1444:
1437:
1435:
1433:
1419:
1404:
1308:
1156:Facial symmetry
1131:
1063:
893:
891:
725:Current Science
597:
595:
479:A pubmed search
410:
408:
404:
360:
351:
345:
327:
263:
260:
257:
254:
253:
246:human sexuality
231:
224:
204:
201:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1727:
1725:
1717:
1716:
1711:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1686:
1681:
1676:
1671:
1666:
1661:
1656:
1646:
1645:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1530:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1431:
1403:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1357:
1356:
1307:
1304:
1303:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1263:
1262:
1250:Miller, W.B. (
1237:
1236:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1176:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1166:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1142:
1141:Attractiveness
1139:
1130:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1062:
1059:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
981:
980:
936:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
912:
881:
880:
879:
878:
866:(3): 233–251.
854:
853:
852:
851:
838:
837:
836:
835:
822:
821:
820:
819:
803:
802:
801:
800:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
761:
760:
759:
758:
748:
747:
746:
745:
735:
734:
733:
732:
718:
717:
716:
715:
698:
697:
686:
685:
646:
645:
619:
618:
617:
616:
574:
573:
550:
549:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
436:
435:
434:
433:
359:
356:
353:
352:
347:
343:
341:
338:
337:
329:
328:
323:
317:
310:
309:
306:
305:
302:
301:
294:Low-importance
290:
284:
283:
276:
270:
269:
267:
250:the discussion
237:
236:
220:
208:
207:
205:Low‑importance
196:
184:
183:
180:
179:
176:Low-importance
166:
156:
155:
152:Mid-importance
142:
132:
131:
124:
118:
117:
115:
98:the discussion
84:
72:
71:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1726:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1685:
1682:
1680:
1677:
1675:
1672:
1670:
1667:
1665:
1662:
1660:
1657:
1655:
1652:
1651:
1649:
1642:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1622:Chiswick Chap
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1597:
1594:
1592:
1587:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1534:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1508:Chiswick Chap
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1465:
1459:
1455:
1449:
1434:
1432:9781612332772
1429:
1425:
1424:
1415:
1410:
1408:
1401:
1397:
1394:
1390:
1389:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1323:
1321:
1316:
1313:
1305:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:Chiswick Chap
1289:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1235:
1232:
1227:
1226:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1212:Chiswick Chap
1208:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1186:
1180:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1146:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1128:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1113:Chiswick Chap
1110:
1108:
1101:
1097:
1094:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1073:
1068:
1060:
1058:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1043:
1038:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:Chiswick Chap
1014:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
999:
998:
994:
990:
989:Chiswick Chap
985:
984:
983:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
959:
958:
957:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
926:
922:
918:
917:Chiswick Chap
913:
911:
907:
903:
899:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
877:
873:
869:
865:
862:
858:
857:
856:
855:
849:
846:
842:
841:
840:
839:
833:
830:
826:
825:
824:
823:
817:
814:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
798:
795:
791:
790:
789:
788:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
769:
765:
764:
763:
762:
756:
752:
751:
750:
749:
743:
739:
738:
737:
736:
731:(4) :563-570.
730:
726:
722:
721:
720:
719:
713:
709:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
696:
693:
688:
687:
684:
680:
676:
672:
667:
666:
665:
664:
660:
656:
651:
650:"Koinophilia"
644:
641:
636:
635:
634:
633:
629:
625:
615:
611:
607:
603:
594:
593:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
575:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:
548:
544:
540:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
505:Chiswick Chap
502:
487:
484:
480:
476:
471:
470:
469:
465:
461:
456:
452:
448:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
432:
428:
424:
420:
407:
402:
399:redirects to
398:
397:User:Jkoeslag
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
380:Chiswick Chap
377:
371:
367:
364:
357:
340:
339:
336:
335:
331:
330:
326:
321:
316:
315:
299:
295:
289:
286:
285:
281:
275:
272:
271:
268:
251:
247:
243:
242:
234:
228:
223:
221:
218:
214:
213:
209:
200:
197:
194:
190:
177:
174:(assessed as
173:
172:
162:
158:
157:
153:
150:(assessed as
149:
148:
138:
134:
133:
129:
123:
120:
119:
116:
99:
95:
91:
90:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1640:
1582:
1560:
1538:
1463:
1436:. Retrieved
1422:
1417:
1412:
1405:
1375:Ambercritter
1327:Ambercritter
1324:
1317:
1309:
1285:
1267:
1259:1-61233-2773
1251:
1238:
1181:
1177:
1132:
1104:
1092:
1064:
1045:
1040:
1036:
969:77.96.125.98
963:— Preceding
935:
897:
863:
860:
847:
844:
831:
828:
815:
812:
804:
796:
793:
767:
754:
741:
728:
724:
711:
707:
699:
647:
620:
601:
535:
498:
474:
409:. Retrieved
372:
368:
365:
361:
332:
324:
293:
239:
169:
145:
87:
40:WikiProjects
1342:Averageness
1320:Averageness
1288:AVERAGENESS
1207:Averageness
1174:Human shape
1150:Averageness
1067:Averageness
939:Averageness
768:Koinophilia
520:Averageness
475:koinophilia
401:User:Oggmus
1648:Categories
1159:Femininity
829:Perception
1605:Pete.Hurd
1448:cite book
850::199-226.
794:Evolution
1438:22 April
1165:Cuteness
1107:WP:MERGE
1093:a priori
965:unsigned
325:Archives
64:Genetics
1484:WP:NPOV
1464:Be Bold
1393:Samsara
1241:Samsara
1231:Samsara
692:Samsara
671:Samsara
640:Samsara
583:Flyer22
579:WP:Lead
563:Flyer22
536:be bold
524:Neoteny
483:Samsara
411:9 April
296:on the
202:C‑class
30:B-class
1565:Oggmus
1541:J8079s
1487:J8079s
1467:J8079s
1346:Oggmus
1272:Oggmus
1190:Oggmus
1138:Beauty
1075:J8079s
1048:J8079s
1003:J8079s
947:J8079s
902:Oggmus
868:Oggmus
675:Oggmus
655:Oggmus
624:Oggmus
606:Oggmus
539:J8079s
532:WP:TNT
460:J8079s
455:WP:CoI
447:J8079s
423:J8079s
376:WP:TNT
36:scale.
1096:WP:OR
1072:WP:OR
1626:talk
1609:talk
1601:here
1569:talk
1561:Done
1545:talk
1512:talk
1491:talk
1471:talk
1458:link
1454:link
1440:2015
1428:ISBN
1379:talk
1350:talk
1331:talk
1310:The
1296:talk
1276:talk
1268:2009
1256:ISBN
1252:2013
1216:talk
1194:talk
1117:talk
1079:talk
1052:talk
1022:talk
1007:talk
993:talk
973:talk
951:talk
921:talk
906:talk
898:Done
872:talk
679:talk
659:talk
628:talk
610:talk
602:Done
587:talk
567:talk
543:talk
528:TLDR
509:talk
464:talk
427:talk
413:2015
384:talk
1100:CoI
1061:tag
864:124
816:137
729:102
712:261
288:Low
122:???
68:MCB
1650::
1628:)
1611:)
1603:.
1571:)
1547:)
1514:)
1493:)
1473:)
1450:}}
1446:{{
1381:)
1352:)
1333:)
1298:)
1278:)
1218:)
1196:)
1119:)
1081:)
1054:)
1024:)
1009:)
995:)
975:)
953:)
923:)
908:)
874:)
848:57
832:36
797:45
727:,
710:.
681:)
661:)
630:)
612:)
589:)
569:)
545:)
511:)
466:)
429:)
421:.
386:)
178:).
154:).
66:/
62::
1624:(
1607:(
1567:(
1543:(
1510:(
1489:(
1469:(
1460:)
1442:.
1377:(
1348:(
1329:(
1294:(
1274:(
1261:.
1214:(
1192:(
1115:(
1109:)
1077:(
1050:(
1020:(
1005:(
991:(
971:(
949:(
919:(
904:(
870:(
677:(
657:(
626:(
608:(
585:(
565:(
541:(
507:(
462:(
445:@
425:(
415:.
382:(
334:1
300:.
274:C
130:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
