1621:, the whole district was included in 'Pakistan' (or at least that is what people believed at the time). However, it is said that the Independence Act wasn't setting out a 'partition line', which had to be decided by a separate Punjab Boundary Commission in due course. Rather it was a line demarcating the districts with Muslim/non-Muslim majority. This division was meant for the Punjab Legislative Assembly, which would sit in two separate sessions to decide whether Punjab was to be partitioned or not. The Muslim majority districts (green) were to sit in one session and the non-Muslim majority districts (pink) in another.
1637:
Ravi river that fed
Amritsar went through the Gurdaspur and Batala tehsils. Radcliffe even floated the idea with his Commissioners whether the canals could be put under joint control of India and Pakistan. They agreed that it would be a good idea, but they said it wasn't in their mandate to decide that. So, it seems that all the four Commissioners knew that the fate of Gurdaspur and Batala tehsils was being decided, but I can't say whether they figured out that Shakargarh would go to Pakistan.
1629:). Radcliffe knew ahead of time that the major disputes were along the Ravi river, with Lahore being Musim-majority and Amritsar non-Muslim majority. (As you can expect, the Muslim judges put Amritsar in Pakistan and the Hindu/Sikh judges put Lahore in India.) Assuming that Lahore and Amritsar would go two ways, the next question was the Gurdaspur district. He decided that the Shakargarh tehsil would go to Pakistan (reasonably), that the Pathankot to India (also reasonably), but that
43:
652:
and the
Pakistani media will say something else (Do any Pakistani sources say Vajpayee started it?). But we ourselves can't start editing like either Indians or Pakistanis here, sadly :D. The Wire is a good source, and no matter how anti-govt, but it is still Indian. The Wire will never write Indian troops opened fire first on the LOC, whereas the Pakistani media will never write Pakistani troops fired first (right?).
249:
228:
1441:. He could have raised it with Radcliffe. I can also tell you that the Sikhs and Muslims of Gurdaspur district most brutally murdered each other during the Partition. There are no Sikhs left in the Shakargarh tehsil (even though there are Hindus) and no Muslims left on the Indian side of the Gurdaspur district. There is plenty of revisionist history now being written in the Sikh propaganda literature. --
259:
59:
21:
1579:
142:
121:
90:
152:
1067:
Mountbatten sent a query to the
Secretary of State for India, Lord Listowell, asking what 'other factors' might mean. Listowell, who had succeeded Pethick-Lawrence as Secretary of State for India, replied that these were entirely for the Punjab Boundary Commissioners to decide. However, he said, 'other factors must include the location of Sikh shrines'.
354:
333:
1079:
Amritsar off too. If that was not to happen, Gurdaspur was the obvious choice, for it contained two other important shrines, Dera Baba Nanak and Sri
Gobindpur. This, more than anything else, probably persuaded the Boundary Commission to decide from the outset that these tehsil must come to east Punjab.
1464:
When Sir Cyril
Radcliffe drew the boundary-line he happened to allot the whole of district Gurdaspur to Pakistan (see June 3, 1947 announcement). How could the universal point go to Pakistan alone? The miracles then began to happen. J.L.Nehru first Prime Minister of India exercised his influence over
491:
Atal Bihari
Vajpayee, in 1999, had been the “first” to propose a visa-free corridor for pilgrims to travel from Dera Baba Nanak in India to Darbar Sahib in Pakistan during his visit to Lahore. The Pakistani government did not respond to this proposal, according to the MEA. The UPA government had also
1351:
After partition, Indian Sikhs would go over informally, crossing a bridge on the Ravi river which joined Dera Baba Nanak with
Kartarpur Sahib. But the bridge was destroyed in the Indo-Pakistan war of 1965 and once again in 1971 during the Bangladesh Liberation War. Until a border fence was set up in
1104:
Yes, not really arbitrary. Slip of tongue, umm, fingers. I've just heard it so often that the facts need reminding. (By the way, this is a wonderful book, the source you have quoted, though I read it 2-3 years back I still remember how well it was written and it brought out so many new things for me
745:
It seems fairly certain that the 1974 protocol on religious visits does not cover
Kartarpur. The Indian MEA claims that it raised it several times. The Gurdwara was however "remained shut from 1947 to 2000", according to its caretaker. Why did it get opened in 2000? Perhaps Vajpayee's prompting. But
625:
The foreign minister recalled Quaid-i-Azam
Muhammad Ali Jinnah's August 11, 1947 speech, quoting him as saying: "You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place or worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or
600:
Yes, my conscience was pricking me when I wrote Sharif too. :D and I should have listened to it. This is a quick reply from my side for now. (This needs a more detailed consideration which will follow once I am able to find better sources). I was looking for what the
Pakistani media says about this,
1699:
There are various claims about Pakistan "offering" to open a corridor since 2000. Yet there were no official announcements or diplomatic exchanges regarding it. The only diplomatic exchanges that are confirmed are those during Vajpayee-Sharif bus diplomacy and the 2008 initiative provoked by Kuldip
1360:
Gobind Singh, the caretaker of the gurdwara at Kartarpur, said the gurdwara had "remained shut from 1947 to 2000". According to Akali leader Kuldeep Singh Wadala, the gurdwara had been abandoned till 2003. It served as a cattle shed for the villagers and its lands were taken over by share-croppers.
1078:
Radcliffe was giving Nankana Sahib in Sheikhupura district, the birthplace of Guru Nanak, and the second holiest shrine of the Sikhs, to Pakistan, as well as Lahore which contained Gurdwara Shahidganj, and four other important shrines related to Gurus Arjun Dev and Ram Das. He could hardly have cut
920:
The timeline checks out. On 20 or 21 June, 2008, McDonald give a press conference at the border near Dera Baba Nanak. On 27 June, Pranab Mukherjee (not SM Krishna, apparently) meets the Pakistani foreign minister. The day after (28 June), he stands at the same spot on the border, and announces that
706:
wrote is very important - "first one to raise the Kartarpur issue at a diplomatic, bilateral level". Pakistan and India at a national level is different as compared to the level of the Sikh community and what they want. I think since Partition, since families were divided by the arbitrary radcliffe
651:
come to a consensus, something like the following should be added, the Indian Media says "this" and the Pakistan media says "this", about who started first, also adding that in principle even Jinnah said "this". I think all of us here know very well that Indian media will try to say we initiated it
572:
I think your phrase and the 2 sources you added and the one above don't agree. Basically all three source said that Vajpayee raised it none of them said Sharif raised it and in fact, looking at the future developments, Sharif appears to have shot down this proposal. So it is not accurate as per the
1636:
Theories abound as to why Radcliffe did that. Prem Shankar Jha believes that it was because of Sikh shrines. But it is hard to tell if Radcliffe even knew about the Sikh shrines that were in the frame. The other theory, which has significant documentation to support it, is that the canals from the
1296:
Two more interesting tidbits added to the page, related a punjab cabinet minister putting black tape on the foundation stone on the Indian side hours before the inauguration. CREDIT WAR haha :D Another interesting part added to lead is about how people look at the shrine on the Pakistani side from
1260:
Sources told The Indian Express that Sidhu, who is also a minister in the Congress government in Punjab, was allocated a numbered seat towards the rear along with other guests, which he had occupied before he was approached by a protocol officer and escorted to a front-row seat. He was then seated
1170:
Government’s view is that a faster and more efficient manner to ensure easy access to the sacred Shrine of Kartarpur Sahib for all Indian pilgrims is by seeking inclusion of the Kartarpur Sahib Shrine and further liberalization of the 1974 Protocol on visits to Religious Shrines. Government has
1066:
The terms of reference of the Boundary Commission had stated that it would 'demarcate the boundaries of the two parts of the Punjab on the basis of ascertaining the contiguous majority areas of Muslims and non-Muslims. In doing so it will also take into account other factors.' When he saw this,
1586:
Here is a quick summary of the partition of the 1947 Gurdaspur district. The population of the district was roughly 50-50 Muslim and non-Muslim. In the 1931 census, apparently the non-Muslims were in a majority. In the 1941 census, the Muslims had a marginal majority. The precise figures are
786:“Pakistan has several times offered to India that it will construct a road to Kartarpur,” says Singh. “The proposals were even approved and during the Musharraf era a tender was floated with 50 per cent of road construction being carried out. But India never responded.”
832:
in the background too. The MEA link says "The list of shrines to be visited will be finalised shortly through correspondence. The agreed list may be enlarged from time to time by mutual agreement." - anyone has a source for the lists? Is Kartarpur a part of this now?
614:
The proposal for the corridor has been on the table since 1988 — when Pakistan and India agreed in principle to construct a corridor from Dera Baba Nanak in India to Kartarpur Sahib in Pakistan — but tense relations between the two countries prevented progress on the
1419:, not history. The man called Goraya, who seems to be the main source for that article, is espousing plenty of make-believe history and Pakistani POV. I have no idea why he calls it the "Chattpur tehsil", which doesn't seem to exist anywhere in the real world.
1624:
The Punjab Boundary Commission was made of four judges: 2 Muslim, 1 Sikh and 1 Hindu. Each of them came up with a different partition line. There was no consensus whatsoever. So, the task fell on Radcliffe to make the final decision (hence the name
1700:
Singh Wadala and Ambassador McDonald. Finally, two unilateral announcements were made recently. Indian government states that until it made its own announcement the Pakistan government has neither confirmed nor denied its various "offers". --
674:
791:
So in a way now we have India MEA saying Pak never responded, and this line says India never responded. But then this is the quote of the caretaker of the gurudwara. That is very different as compared to an MEA saying the same.
1815:
to gang up here. Anyways, if the Indian govt. has any concerns, it has to have expressed them on record. Unless Suhasini Haider is quoting any Indian govt. official on record, we can't put any hearsay of her Opinion pieces.
1171:
raised the matter of expanding the list of Shrines included in the 1974 Protocol on visits to Religious Shrines including during meetings at the level of Foreign Ministers. There has been no response from Pakistan so far.
1422:
The second paragraph is attributing select pieces of information to people that can be presumed to have some direct knowledge of what they are talking about. The first paragraph doesn't have any attributions. --
946:
Thank you for following this up. I want to include a small section in the background related to this. Do you think the following sources are notable enough to include within the article. They are all related to
1932:
While the content of your revision may have contained valid, factual information, that information was inserted inappropriately into the page. From memory, three things about your revision caught my attention:
828:" , connects Sikhs to the protocol and saying India is a fault in not implementing it, (in a way covering Kartarpur? but not directly mentioning kartarpur) just to complicate things even more. But mentioning
685:
When I read this new info I am like, where did this angle come from!!! .... Considering all of this new information, the background and history part of this Knowledge (XXG) article needs a LOOOOT of work :D
541:, yeah, this seems to be worthy of a place in the article's body with a small mention its lede about Vajpayee being the firstone to raise the Kartarpur issue at a diplomatic, bilateral level. Regards,
767:, or anyone else can edit my lines related to Sharif and Vajpayee since it is inaccurate currently. I have no issues with this. Can be done now itself. A detailed history can considered added later.
1891:
Hi MTCoster! Can you tell why did you undid my revision and removed a valid reference provided by me about ETA required for corridor instead of visa travel?Is there any wiki policy in doing so?
1261:
next to Masood Khan, the president of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), a person whose identity the Indian politician was not aware of until informed by an official of the Indian High Commission.
921:
the Indian government will conduct a feasibility study. So, something was agreed between India and Pakistan. The Indian MEA's claim that there was no response from Pakistan seems dubious. --
404:
1749:
2134:
1789:
If the Indian government has concerns, we say it has concerns. If it has communicated them, we say it has communicated them. I don't see why there is any confusion. Suhasini Haider and
394:
2139:
370:
1744:
711:. So the background can be changed to that the Sikhs have always wanted it. Deciding who raised the issue first diplomatically is different. Will wait for others to comment.
746:
we can't be sure if it was Nawaz Sharif's initiative or Musharraf's. Remember the Kargil war intervening. So, it might have been some time after 2000 that it got opened. --
707:
line in many places, since a major religious site was no longer possible to visit easily, the Sikhs have always wanted it since 1947. See this BBC cite to back this up...
2129:
2104:
602:
1365:
Both have reliable sources right?. But how could the the gurdwara be abandoned or remained shut for all these years.... if people went on over the border even before?
361:
338:
2089:
1746:
1523:
806:
Sorry, the caretaker of the Gurdwara is hardly an expert on international relations. He would have believed whatever he was told. Not a reliable source. --
315:
2084:
1328:
2119:
305:
1968:
210:
1666:
over the statements made about 1940s and 1950s history, claiming they were "non-cited claims". Both the statements you have removed are from the
2124:
2099:
1633:
Gurdaspur and Batala tehsils would go to India as well. This meant a 3-to-1 ratio in favour of non-Muslims and it became highly controversial.
200:
1743:
The Indian Govt. had expressed reservations about Pakistan using this to stoke Khalistani passions. Also recently there were several articles
281:
1775:
Unless the Indian govt. has officially or publicly communicated something like this to Pakistan, these articles could hardly be relied upon.
1148:
1069:
This looks very much like a directive to the Radcliffe Commission. Sir Cyril certainly paid heed to it, but not unduly at Pakistan's expense.
897:, led by a former American diplomat, John W. McDonald. He also claims to have been the force behind the "People's bus" across the Kashmirs
970:
Bridging the Sikh Divide: Could a proposed new initiative help establish a peace corridor between two of the holiest Sikh religious sites?
2109:
1537:"The Sikh Monuments in Pakistan, conservation and preservation: Can Monument of Kartarpur Sahib bring peace between India and Pakistan?"
70:
2114:
954:
1460:
There is a full article written by Goraya, published in the "Journal of the Punjab University Historical Society". It has this gem:
996:
Excellent. Go for it! And, I don't think it needs to be a "short" paragraph. IMTD is clearly the force behind the whole project. --
272:
233:
825:
964:
958:
1181:
So this is another aspect of the article that needs to be considered and added, as I mentioned above, and Kautilya first noted.
2094:
1561:
951:, Institute for Multi-Track Diplomacy (IMTD) and the report the feasibility report they came out with related to the corridor.
552:
821:
101:
975:
175:
165:
126:
1618:
1524:
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/a-shrine-so-near-yet-so-far-their-prayers-travel-across-border-they-cant-4797157/
1437:
I can tell you that there was no mention of Kartarpur in any of the partition discussions. There was a Sikh judge on the
781:
In the article by DAWN tagged by Kautilya3 it says this (Singh below refers to Gobind Singh, caretaker of the gurdwara) -
1361:
Since 2003, however, the Pakistani government has reportedly taken initiatives for the upkeep of Sikh religious shrines.
1692:
We have tried to minimize India-Pakistan bickering in this article, because that is not what the article is about. So,
1497:
1394:
1370:
1302:
1287:
1186:
1110:
1037:
987:
838:
797:
772:
716:
691:
662:
485:
467:
438:
433:
I had removed passport free and made it visa free... and had put two sources for the same. You put back passport free?
1671:
1863:
are as reliable as the Hindu. I think we should just should add statements that promote neutrality of the article.
42:
1969:
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/pakistan-use-kartarpur-khalistan-terror-former-army-chief-1590700-2019-08-23
1536:
1297:
the Indian side, and an elevated platform has even been constructed for the same. (All cites already in article.)
1724:
1617:, the whole of Gurdaspur district was included in 'Hindustan'. In the 'notional' partition line attached to the
1282:
Indeed interesting! I hope Sidhu writes a tell all autobiography about his life, including all this someday :D
620:
Although not directly relevant, but indirectly part of the background of all this, the article also says this -
107:
1058:
Not really arbitrary. This is the famous Gurdaspur award, the most contentious decision of all of Partition.
1493:
1390:
1366:
1298:
1283:
1182:
1106:
1033:
983:
884:
834:
793:
768:
712:
687:
682:
the Sikh Diaspora has agreed to pay for the $ 17 million construction cost of the Kartarpur Peace Corridor "
658:
569:
463:
434:
366:
1947:
Had it not been for the ".gov.in" extension on the included URL, I would have mistaken your edit for spam.
1939:
The new information referenced a detail more specific that generally expected in the opening paragraph, and
978:
55 page Report by Surinder Singh, 2010, with contributions by John W. McDonald. But can't find the content.
1856:
1841:
I wrote the majority of this page, including the section you deleted. I didn't need to be "canvassed". --
1821:
1780:
1590:
The district had four tehsils, Shakargarh and Pathankot in the north, Gurdaspur and Batala in the south.
2061:
2017:
1987:
1887:
Removal of valid reference on Kartarpur Corridor and undoing my revision about ETA requirement to travel
1760:
582:
505:
369:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
280:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1225:
The 1947 Gurdaspur district had four tehsils: Gurdaspur and Batala tehsils, which now form part of the
75:
2032:
Note: It's better to avoid adding such statements on the article. We should promote mutuality. Peace.
1492:
Thank you for checking this out in such an interesting way and also the background check on Goraya :D
1175:
PIB, Government of India, MEA (30-July-2014 17:34 IST) - Land corridor to religious places in Pakistan
2037:
1868:
1855:
Indian sources can be biased sometimes even if they are by reputable agencies just like in Pakistan.
1721:
33:
632:
89:
2011:
1981:
1948:
1906:
1846:
1802:
1754:
1705:
1678:
1645:
1478:
1446:
1428:
1270:
1242:
1092:
1019:
1001:
926:
910:
811:
751:
644:
576:
546:
538:
529:
499:
453:
1473:. So there goes the reliability of Goraya as well as the Punjab University Historical Society. --
1412:
636:
1978:
thoughts on what can be added here and in which sections ? I feel the article above is useful. --
1952:
1606:
1600:
1230:
1226:
826:
1974 protocol: Envoy urges India to allow religious tourism actually connects Sikhs to the 1974
20:
1922:
1914:
1896:
1817:
1776:
1659:
1594:
1555:
1352:
the area in 1986, Sikhs would go over the Indian Pakistan border illegally for the pilgrimage.
1145:
2002:
2056:
1860:
1234:
1135:
1059:
1029:
1011:
969:
948:
606:
2051:
1835:
1237:. We should not link the 1947 Gurdaspur district to the present day Gurdaspur district. --
1208:
2033:
1864:
894:
264:
1831:
1794:
1975:
1842:
1798:
1701:
1674:
1641:
1626:
1614:
1474:
1470:
1442:
1438:
1424:
1384:
1266:
1238:
1088:
1015:
997:
941:
922:
906:
807:
764:
747:
703:
648:
640:
565:
561:
542:
525:
449:
428:
1640:
Kartarpur is in the Shakargarh tehsil and Dera Baba Nanak in the Gurdaspur tehsil. --
2078:
1084:
1670:
article titled "Access first promised in 1969". Here is a link to the article again
1918:
1910:
1892:
1793:
are best quality news sources in South Asia. You can't simply remove them based on
157:
1465:
Mountbatten and the Partition Plan was revised. This time Gurdaspur was bisected.
1139:
486:
At Kartarpur Ceremony, Imran Khan Emphasises Cooperation, Says Army on 'Same Page
1834:. In fact, all the sources you deleted are reliable sources. You can take it to
1578:
1329:
Pakistan army chief asks Navjot Singh Sidhu about overland Sikh pilgrimage route
708:
248:
227:
58:
448:
Yeah, it looks like I overwrote your edit. I have tried to recover it now. --
254:
147:
1942:
A raw URL was inserted directly into the page without hyperlink or reference.
1909:
please explain your undid revision action in light of above raised questions.
1751:
on this. The "security concern" section should be expanded using this info.--
2067:
2041:
2026:
1996:
1956:
1926:
1900:
1872:
1850:
1825:
1806:
1784:
1769:
1730:
1709:
1682:
1649:
1501:
1482:
1450:
1432:
1398:
1374:
1306:
1291:
1274:
1246:
1190:
1114:
1096:
1041:
1023:
1005:
991:
930:
914:
842:
815:
801:
776:
755:
720:
695:
666:
591:
556:
533:
514:
471:
457:
442:
65:
27:
141:
120:
26:
A news item involving Kartarpur Corridor was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1936:
The inserted text broke the surrounding sentence, rendering it unreadable,
830:
the 1974 protocol needs to go into the main article too somewhere in brief
656:
Can anyone find sources talking about the Kartarpur corridor before 2010?
277:
1719:
Swapping the order of the flags is also not constructive. All the best:
1812:
1469:
So, Radcliffe supposedly drew a line 3 June 1947. But he didn't even
709:
BBC - Kartarpur corridor: A road to peace between India and Pakistan?
1256:
Interesting tidbit of what the Indian press calls the "Sidhu card":
1211:. Press Information Bureau Government of India Minis. 30 July 2014.
866:
742:
There is a lot of posturing by both sides. So we should be careful.
173:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
965:
Institute for Multi-Track Diplomacy (IMTD) Annual Report 2010, pg 6
1577:
957:
Source ANI, 2009. (But I can't find this anywhere else except for
170:
353:
332:
83:
53:
15:
902:
898:
626:
creed that has nothing to do with the business of the State."
496:
I think this should be included in the article. Thoughts ? --
1166:
I found a source connecting the 1974 protocol to Kartarpur.
675:
Peacemaking: From Practice to Theory - Volume 1 - Page 72-73
41:
822:
Protocol on visits to Religious Shrines, September 14, 1974
64:
A fact from this article was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2003:
https://thewire.in/rights/sikhs-khalistan-threat-kartarpur
1838:
if you wish. (I am sure you know what that is, don't you?)
955:"Blueprint for peace corridor between India and Pakistan"
601:
and I want to bring everyone's attention to a line in an
1830:
It is not an "opinion piece". It is a news report and a
702:
And lastly, for now until everyone else weighs in, what
2050:
The question is whether the inclusion of this would be
1693:
1663:
521:
1344:
Please compare these two paragraphs in the article -
1233:, and the Shakargarh tehsil, which is now part of the
1087:
is the second most important shrine for the Sikhs. --
1083:
Interestingly, there is no mention of Kartarpur here.
169:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of
1673:. Can you confirm that you have read the article? --
365:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
276:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1544:
Journal of the Punjab University Historical Society
1340:
Help needed...Contradictory Information in Article?
379:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject International relations
492:raised it in the last ten years at several levels.
462:Ok. I thought so. Just wanted to confirm. Thanks.
1032:, clearly someone else. Silly overlook. Thanks.
2135:Low-importance International relations articles
1209:"Land corridor to religious places in Pakistan"
824:, this article in The Tribune (pk) in April - "
609:, (notable enough, just from Pakistan though).
1462:
1358:
1349:
1258:
1168:
1076:
1064:
784:
680:
623:
612:
489:
8:
2140:WikiProject International relations articles
1162:1974 Protocol on visits to Religious Shrines
382:Template:WikiProject International relations
327:
222:
115:
2130:C-Class International relations articles
2105:C-Class India articles of Low-importance
1609:probably had a marginal Muslim majority.
1141:Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History
568:for your comments. Regarding the Diff,
1516:
1321:
1200:
1127:
859:
329:
224:
117:
87:
2090:Selected anniversaries (November 2021)
1553:
890:
573:source to say Vajpayee and Shariff. --
1331:, The Indian Express, 19 August 2018.
1229:, Pathankot tehsil, which is now the
7:
2085:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles
1535:Goraya, B. S. (July–December 2017),
1014:. That is clearly somebody else. --
359:This article is within the scope of
290:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pakistan
270:This article is within the scope of
163:This article is within the scope of
1974:There is a quote from General beg.
1574:Partition of the Gurdaspur district
1415:. Newspapers are only reliable for
895:Institute for Multi-Track Diplomacy
878:Institute for Multi-Track Diplomacy
362:WikiProject International relations
106:It is of interest to the following
1411:I think the first source is not a
1144:, Oxford University Press, p. 81,
14:
2054:. It doesn't seem to be the case.
185:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India
2120:Low-importance Pakistan articles
1603:had a clear non-Muslim majority.
385:International relations articles
352:
331:
257:
247:
226:
150:
140:
119:
88:
57:
19:
1917:) 15:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
891:where did this angle come from?
399:This article has been rated as
310:This article has been rated as
205:This article has been rated as
2068:02:04, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
2042:20:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
1873:20:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
1389:What do you think about this?
867:Footprints: The borders of man
1:
2125:WikiProject Pakistan articles
2100:Low-importance India articles
2027:08:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
1997:08:25, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
1957:20:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
1927:15:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
1901:06:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
1851:05:20, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
1826:23:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
1807:17:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
1785:14:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
1770:12:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
1731:16:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
1710:18:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
1683:09:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
1650:13:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
1582:Districts of Undivided Punjab
1502:12:22, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
1483:09:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
1451:07:48, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
1433:07:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
1399:20:22, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
1375:20:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
1307:19:36, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
1292:12:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
1105:in such a interesting read).
1042:14:39, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
1024:13:53, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
1006:13:51, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
992:12:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
373:and see a list of open tasks.
293:Template:WikiProject Pakistan
284:and see a list of open tasks.
1811:It seems you guys have been
1597:had a clear Muslim majority.
1275:19:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
1247:17:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
1191:15:31, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
1115:16:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
1097:15:14, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
972:Source thediplomat.com, 2011
931:21:54, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
915:20:43, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
843:15:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
816:15:18, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
802:15:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
777:14:52, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
756:14:32, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
721:13:58, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
696:13:45, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
673:See what this source says -
667:13:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
592:12:36, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
557:21:57, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
534:21:46, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
515:20:44, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
472:21:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
458:20:35, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
443:20:25, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
38:section on 11 November 2019.
1560:: CS1 maint: date format (
1471:arrive in India till 8 July
2156:
2110:WikiProject India articles
1439:Punjab boundary commission
869:, Dawn, 18 September 2018.
480:Vajpayee raised it in 1999
405:project's importance scale
316:project's importance scale
211:project's importance scale
188:Template:WikiProject India
2115:C-Class Pakistan articles
1619:Independence of India Act
1265:Interesting dynamics! --
1054:Arbitrary Radcliffe Line?
398:
347:
309:
242:
204:
135:
114:
1688:India-Pakistan bickering
564:thanks for the diff and
2008:found one more here. --
1615:Wavell's partition line
376:International relations
367:International relations
339:International relations
2095:C-Class India articles
1963:Corridor for terrorism
1857:The News International
1583:
1467:
1363:
1354:
1263:
1221:The Gurdaspur district
1179:
1081:
1072:
788:
684:
628:
617:
570:User:DiplomatTesterMan
494:
96:This article is rated
47:
1581:
100:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
45:
1607:Gurdaspur and Batala
273:WikiProject Pakistan
1694:additions like this
639:, until we editors
1584:
1231:Pathankot district
1227:Gurdaspur district
102:content assessment
48:
1739:Security concerns
1734:
1696:are not welcome.
1494:DiplomatTesterMan
1391:DiplomatTesterMan
1367:DiplomatTesterMan
1299:DiplomatTesterMan
1284:DiplomatTesterMan
1183:DiplomatTesterMan
1177:
1150:978-0-19-563766-3
1136:Jha, Prem Shankar
1107:DiplomatTesterMan
1034:DiplomatTesterMan
984:DiplomatTesterMan
893:It came from the
885:DiplomatTesterMan
835:DiplomatTesterMan
794:DiplomatTesterMan
769:DiplomatTesterMan
713:DiplomatTesterMan
688:DiplomatTesterMan
659:DiplomatTesterMan
464:DiplomatTesterMan
435:DiplomatTesterMan
419:
418:
415:
414:
411:
410:
326:
325:
322:
321:
296:Pakistan articles
221:
220:
217:
216:
166:WikiProject India
82:
81:
52:
51:
2147:
2024:
2021:
2015:
1994:
1991:
1985:
1861:Dawn (newspaper)
1767:
1764:
1758:
1729:
1662:, you have been
1566:
1565:
1559:
1551:
1541:
1532:
1526:
1521:
1388:
1332:
1326:
1235:Narowal District
1213:
1212:
1205:
1172:
1154:
1153:
1132:
1074:He also states:
1060:Prem Shankar Jha
1030:John W. McDonald
1012:John W. McDonald
949:John W. McDonald
945:
888:
870:
864:
607:Dawn (newspaper)
589:
586:
580:
512:
509:
503:
484:per this source
432:
387:
386:
383:
380:
377:
356:
349:
348:
343:
335:
328:
298:
297:
294:
291:
288:
267:
262:
261:
260:
251:
244:
243:
238:
230:
223:
193:
192:
189:
186:
183:
160:
155:
154:
153:
144:
137:
136:
131:
123:
116:
99:
93:
92:
84:
76:November 9, 2021
61:
54:
23:
16:
2155:
2154:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2075:
2074:
2066:
2019:
2013:
2010:
1989:
1983:
1980:
1965:
1889:
1832:reliable source
1762:
1756:
1753:
1741:
1717:
1690:
1657:
1576:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1552:
1539:
1534:
1533:
1529:
1522:
1518:
1382:
1342:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1327:
1323:
1254:
1223:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1164:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1151:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1056:
1010:But don't link
939:
882:
880:
875:
874:
873:
865:
861:
820:Related to the
584:
578:
575:
507:
501:
498:
482:
426:
424:
384:
381:
378:
375:
374:
341:
295:
292:
289:
286:
285:
265:Pakistan portal
263:
258:
256:
236:
190:
187:
184:
181:
180:
156:
151:
149:
129:
97:
46:Knowledge (XXG)
12:
11:
5:
2153:
2151:
2143:
2142:
2137:
2132:
2127:
2122:
2117:
2112:
2107:
2102:
2097:
2092:
2087:
2077:
2076:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2060:
2045:
2044:
2006:
2005:
1972:
1971:
1964:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1940:
1937:
1888:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1839:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1716:
1713:
1689:
1686:
1656:
1653:
1627:Radcliffe Line
1611:
1610:
1604:
1598:
1575:
1572:
1568:
1567:
1527:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1435:
1420:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1341:
1338:
1334:
1333:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1253:
1250:
1222:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1173:
1163:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1149:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1008:
981:
980:
979:
976:Kartarpur Marg
973:
967:
962:
934:
933:
879:
876:
872:
871:
858:
857:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
789:
782:
779:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
678:
653:
629:
621:
618:
610:
536:
481:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
423:
422:Edit conflict?
420:
417:
416:
413:
412:
409:
408:
401:Low-importance
397:
391:
390:
388:
371:the discussion
357:
345:
344:
342:Low‑importance
336:
324:
323:
320:
319:
312:Low-importance
308:
302:
301:
299:
282:the discussion
269:
268:
252:
240:
239:
237:Low‑importance
231:
219:
218:
215:
214:
207:Low-importance
203:
197:
196:
194:
191:India articles
162:
161:
145:
133:
132:
130:Low‑importance
124:
112:
111:
105:
94:
80:
79:
62:
50:
49:
39:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2152:
2141:
2138:
2136:
2133:
2131:
2128:
2126:
2123:
2121:
2118:
2116:
2113:
2111:
2108:
2106:
2103:
2101:
2098:
2096:
2093:
2091:
2088:
2086:
2083:
2082:
2080:
2069:
2065:
2064:
2059:
2058:
2053:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2016:
2004:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1995:
1993:
1986:
1977:
1970:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1934:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1886:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1814:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1768:
1766:
1759:
1750:
1747:
1745:
1738:
1736:
1732:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1714:
1712:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1697:
1695:
1687:
1685:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1654:
1652:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1638:
1634:
1632:
1628:
1622:
1620:
1616:
1608:
1605:
1602:
1599:
1596:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1588:
1580:
1573:
1563:
1557:
1549:
1545:
1538:
1531:
1528:
1525:
1520:
1517:
1513:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1466:
1461:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1421:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1386:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1362:
1357:
1353:
1348:
1345:
1339:
1330:
1325:
1322:
1318:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1262:
1257:
1251:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1220:
1210:
1204:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1178:
1176:
1167:
1161:
1152:
1147:
1143:
1142:
1137:
1131:
1128:
1124:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1085:Nankana Sahib
1080:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1063:
1061:
1053:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
994:
993:
989:
985:
982:
977:
974:
971:
968:
966:
963:
960:
956:
953:
952:
950:
943:
938:
937:
936:
935:
932:
928:
924:
919:
918:
917:
916:
912:
908:
904:
900:
899:video, part 1
896:
892:
886:
877:
868:
863:
860:
856:
844:
840:
836:
831:
827:
823:
819:
818:
817:
813:
809:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
790:
787:
783:
780:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
743:
722:
718:
714:
710:
705:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
683:
679:
676:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
664:
660:
657:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
627:
622:
619:
616:
611:
608:
604:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
590:
588:
581:
571:
567:
563:
560:
559:
558:
554:
551:
548:
544:
540:
537:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:
517:
516:
513:
511:
504:
493:
488:
487:
479:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:
459:
455:
451:
447:
446:
445:
444:
440:
436:
430:
421:
406:
402:
396:
393:
392:
389:
372:
368:
364:
363:
358:
355:
351:
350:
346:
340:
337:
334:
330:
317:
313:
307:
304:
303:
300:
283:
279:
275:
274:
266:
255:
253:
250:
246:
245:
241:
235:
232:
229:
225:
212:
208:
202:
199:
198:
195:
178:
177:
172:
168:
167:
159:
148:
146:
143:
139:
138:
134:
128:
125:
122:
118:
113:
109:
103:
95:
91:
86:
85:
77:
73:
72:
67:
63:
60:
56:
55:
44:
40:
37:
36:
35:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2062:
2055:
2009:
2007:
1979:
1973:
1904:
1890:
1818:Bigfoot Yeti
1790:
1777:Bigfoot Yeti
1752:
1742:
1720:
1718:
1698:
1691:
1667:
1664:edit-warring
1660:Amanverma121
1658:
1639:
1635:
1630:
1623:
1612:
1589:
1585:
1547:
1543:
1530:
1519:
1511:
1468:
1463:
1459:
1416:
1364:
1359:
1355:
1350:
1346:
1343:
1324:
1316:
1264:
1259:
1255:
1224:
1203:
1195:
1180:
1174:
1169:
1165:
1140:
1130:
1122:
1082:
1077:
1073:
1068:
1065:
1057:
961:, OneIndia.)
881:
862:
854:
829:
785:
744:
741:
681:
655:
631:I think for
624:
613:
574:
549:
497:
495:
490:
483:
425:
400:
360:
311:
271:
206:
176:project page
174:
164:
158:India portal
108:WikiProjects
69:
32:
31:
1587:contested.
1028:Opps. Yes.
889:you asked,
74:section on
71:On this day
34:In the news
2079:Categories
2034:Pakieditor
1865:Pakieditor
1725:Farmbrough
1595:Shakargarh
1512:References
1317:References
1252:Sidhu card
1196:References
1123:References
855:References
633:WP:BALANCE
1976:Kautilya3
1843:Kautilya3
1813:canvassed
1799:Kautilya3
1791:The Hindu
1702:Kautilya3
1675:Kautilya3
1642:Kautilya3
1601:Pathankot
1475:Kautilya3
1443:Kautilya3
1425:Kautilya3
1413:WP:HISTRS
1385:Kautilya3
1267:Kautilya3
1239:Kautilya3
1089:Kautilya3
1016:Kautilya3
998:Kautilya3
942:Kautilya3
923:Kautilya3
907:Kautilya3
808:Kautilya3
765:Kautilya3
763:For now,
748:Kautilya3
704:SshibumXZ
649:Kautilya3
641:SshibumXZ
637:WP:VERIFY
566:SshibumXZ
562:Kautilya3
543:SshibumXZ
526:Kautilya3
450:Kautilya3
429:Kautilya3
66:Main Page
28:Main Page
1949:MTCoster
1907:MTCoster
1556:citation
1138:(1996),
645:DBigXray
553:contribs
539:DBigXray
287:Pakistan
278:Pakistan
234:Pakistan
1919:Guglani
1911:Guglani
1893:Guglani
1668:Tribune
1062:notes:
603:article
403:on the
314:on the
209:on the
98:C-class
68:in the
30:in the
2052:WP:DUE
1836:WP:RSN
903:part 2
677:(2011)
104:scale.
1797:. --
1795:WP:OR
1715:Flags
1655:1950s
1540:(PDF)
905:. --
615:plan.
605:from
524:. --
182:India
171:India
127:India
2063:talk
2038:talk
1953:talk
1923:talk
1915:talk
1897:talk
1869:talk
1847:talk
1822:talk
1803:talk
1781:talk
1722:Rich
1706:talk
1679:talk
1646:talk
1631:both
1562:link
1498:talk
1479:talk
1447:talk
1429:talk
1417:news
1395:talk
1371:talk
1303:talk
1288:talk
1271:talk
1243:talk
1187:talk
1146:ISBN
1111:talk
1093:talk
1038:talk
1020:talk
1002:talk
988:talk
959:here
927:talk
911:talk
839:talk
812:talk
798:talk
773:talk
752:talk
717:talk
692:talk
663:talk
635:and
547:talk
530:talk
522:diff
520:See
468:talk
454:talk
439:talk
2020:ray
2014:Big
1990:ray
1984:Big
1763:ray
1757:Big
1748:%20
1613:In
1550:(2)
1356:2.
585:ray
579:Big
555:).
508:ray
502:Big
395:Low
306:Low
201:Low
2081::
2057:VR
2040:)
1955:)
1925:)
1899:)
1871:)
1859:,
1849:)
1824:)
1805:)
1783:)
1708:)
1681:)
1648:)
1558:}}
1554:{{
1546:,
1542:,
1500:)
1481:)
1449:)
1431:)
1397:)
1373:)
1347:1.
1305:)
1290:)
1273:)
1245:)
1189:)
1113:)
1095:)
1040:)
1022:)
1004:)
990:)
929:)
913:)
901:,
841:)
814:)
800:)
775:)
754:)
719:)
694:)
665:)
647:,
643:,
532:)
470:)
456:)
441:)
2036:(
2022:á—™
2018:X
2012:D
1992:á—™
1988:X
1982:D
1951:(
1921:(
1913:(
1905:@
1895:(
1867:(
1845:(
1820:(
1801:(
1779:(
1765:á—™
1761:X
1755:D
1733:.
1728:,
1704:(
1677:(
1644:(
1564:)
1548:3
1496:(
1477:(
1445:(
1427:(
1393:(
1387::
1383:@
1369:(
1301:(
1286:(
1269:(
1241:(
1185:(
1109:(
1091:(
1036:(
1018:(
1000:(
986:(
944::
940:@
925:(
909:(
887::
883:@
837:(
810:(
796:(
771:(
750:(
715:(
690:(
661:(
587:á—™
583:X
577:D
550:·
545:(
528:(
510:á—™
506:X
500:D
466:(
452:(
437:(
431::
427:@
407:.
318:.
213:.
179:.
110::
78:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
-logo-v2.svg.png){kind=logo}
