819:
sources mentioning them as Jats relate to Mirza
Sahiban however that is because that's what the Kharrals are most known for and the references in the introduction are just placeholders that give general summary to hold article in place. Not dissimilar to quoting British sources by other authors for Rajput origin. However, the most direct and reliable source is the one of Iftekhar Ahmed and that also mentions that the Kharrals are Jats and that Rajput origin is fabricated however it doesnt need to be cited in introductory sentence. Now the 2 sources you mentioned I removed, like I said are caste based pseudo-historians, are therefore not reliable and you can check edit history of the various Punjabi tribes the sources have been removed whenever detected. The reason is because they are basically regurgitating what the British sources say but adding a caste angle to them and have no actual qualifications in the subject.
564:
general rule on
Knowledge write Jat and Rajput. You keep saying some sources say they are Jat but they are actually not. You cannot say that without a proper reference. And for instance even if you had a reference to prove this you would say: 'X author is of the opinion that the term Jat is a general term and they are actually Just Rajputs'. You would still absolutely not remove Jat from the lead. However, to this topic the dual Jat/Rajput tribes has been a discussion in academic circles for a while now and there is no consensus as to why certain tribes claim to be both. Some argue that aborignal tribes fabricate Rajput ancestory, some say more dominant tribes claim Rajput ancestory, some say it is related to geography, and some consider Jats to be an elactic socail grouping agricultuaral tribes with no ethnic basis....
1106:"The Kharrals were Rajputs. Their ancestor was Raja a Karan of Hastinapur. His descendant Bhupa left that place and came to Uch, where he and his son Kharral were converted by Makhdum Jahania Shah. From Uch the Kharrals spread over the country about the Ravi. They appear to have settled first in the Sandal Bar (Lyallpur District), no doubt with a view to having plenty of pasture for their cattle. Ranjit Singh is said to have induced or compelled them to move to villages nearer to the river, possibly with a view to exercising more effective control over them."
849:
area where all this story played out, the perspective on Mirza starts changing as people call him a Kharal. Most so called reliable sources authors which have mostly not done any field research work have never gone to the real stage area and researched practically. I have myself seen the old ancestral records (in custody of
Musalis and kamis) of Kharals of Doanabad and Pindi Isa and have found none information about Mirza and his father. The leader of Doanabad Kharals at the moment of the story being played out was Rai Rahmoo who didn't had any son as Mirza.
21:
128:
110:
79:
213:
192:
718:. This is the reason why almost none of the articles on Punjabi tribe on Knowledge have references of the the British Raj sources. Even if I don't remove the British Raj sources or the pseudo-historian citations of yours in 6 months to maybe an year other editors will because we just don't cite them in articles. Also, I am not against you, in fact I had to learn this as well!
223:
1120:
I think you don't much knowledge about king karna which you are referring rajput are kshatriya and karna was suryaputra demi god dhillon clan who estab and rulled delhi for 4000 years were also considered as jat and they also claim descendants from king karna on the other hand kharal was mentioned as
657:
source 8 is modern source 9 is modern source 10 is modern source 11 is modern source 12 is a cencus report of 1911. source 13 is about all
Punjabi casts source 14 is a scientific report on Indians differentiating between how health and body features change and vary in different castes and areas.
621:
all of the lead sources did not for instance mention the
Kharals are jats the rest of the article contains numerous sources that do. However, all of the lead sources used to mention the Kharals as jats say that kharals are Jats except for one which I will confirm afer this. The Kharals (atleast many)
931:
To the best of my knowledge, it seems that no medieval or premodern source ever describes or identifies the 'Kharals' as 'Rajputs'. In fact, neither Pilu, nor Waris Shah, nor Ganesh Das Wadera, nor any of the administrators and ministers (wazirs) in the Mughal court ever put 'Kharal' and 'Rajput' in
848:
How can you say
Iftikhar Ahmed's book is more reliable does he give some evidence. none! •(For extra information) Do you know well how can you know, after practical field research (in the nearby area only) you can find that Mirza was a Sahi as elders say but as you move further away from the actual
1193:
Do you think this is reliable source aren't you traping inside multipe connection to any random account of genelogy first your confronting kharal are descendants from king karna of hustinapur but now you believe kharal from punwar rajput descents but actually the reality is different because I have
954:
seem to have developed a tendency of adopting an identity distinct from the remainder of Punjab during colonial rule. This was actually strategically encouraged by
British ethnographers who aimed to drive recruitment from the fringes rather than the centre (the latter being largely pro-Ranjit Singh
759:
If you have done it by mistake ok but be careful the other time. If you have some difficulty with the upper mentioned sources please tell me before removing them. These sources were found by me after days of work and research and why had written you the Amr Nath Bali writing in the second paragraph
1138:
I do not know about the exact details about this, just talking from those colonial sources and what our elders told us. We do not deny that some of our sub-clans like the Khars hold Jat status in terms of their profession, but we are given the title Rai Kharal (title held by
Rajputs). You might be
818:
Easiest
Consensus meaning is if a senior editor sees the citation of British Raj sources they remove them and that they have discussed the issue on multiple talk pages. If you do see British Raj sources being quoted alone let me know I can remove them or you can do it yourself. I agree half of the
533:
source 1 : can't access the full article source 2 : doesn't say
Kharals are Jatts source 3 : doesn't say Kharals are Jatts, says Mirza was epitome of Jat values but as you know Jatts are all those who are agriculturalists, no direct saying that Kharals are Jatts. source 4 : didn't said Kharals are
958:
The Kharals in discussion here are those of the Rechnau Doab (one example being Toba Tek Singh) - where they are most numerous and historically prominent, almost all other than a few newly-political families in Kamalia identify as Jatt. The people around them also refer to them as "Jaangli Jatt"
577:
1. British era colonial sources are almost never cited when dealing with Punjabi tribes by the concensus of senior editors unless with a modern academic source backing the colonial one, You cited: Report on the Revised Settlement of the Jhang District of the Punjab, Notes on the Pathans of the
935:
Also – an analysis of premodern sources suggests that Jat was NOT the "elastic designator" that modern liberal and Hindutva revisionist historians often misconstrue it to be. The preeminent use of the word Jat is in fact as an ethnocultural/tribal designator in the Mughal provinces of Lahore,
563:
Look you can keep deleting refs, we can only assume good faith so many times. And you also cannot insert your POV or peersonal expertise on the Kharals into the article you have to stick strictly to the sources. If one source identifies a Punjabi tribe as Jat while the other as Rajput. We as a
1056:
Why you are providing fake genelogy as per your information kharal are the clan of agnikul descendant of king karna but karna was not considered as kshatriya he is demigod who's father is surya dev and mother was kunti , by the way dhillon also claim descendants from karna even mutiny record
777:
And please try to find some good sources regarding Kharals as Jatts as all of the current sources are either about Mirza Sahiban or they have just discussed it to give example. I think wiki community should have consensus on sourcese which are directly for the mentioned topic or matter.
1085:
Sir can you clear a doubt arise for me, in the conflict between britisher and Rai Ahmed kharal they simply mentioned him as jat under mutiny record but through the period of time (near19th century they start calling themselves with rajput tittle what is the reason for it
639:
Mr Nawabmalhi I gave proper sourcing of British respected Historians and books of undeniable factuality while you are giving sources which are not even about Kharals. Please stop this vandalism. I gave 10 sources for Kharals being Rajputs which all directly said that.
658:
source 15 is a British report on Jhang district people. source 16 is the whole gazeeter of Punjab source 17 is modern source 18 is modern (1960s) source 19 is modern source 20 is the writing of H.A Rose whose Important work is undeniably a treasure for us.
1010:
I understand but how they are related to rajput I am ready to give you source Secretary of Chief Commissioner of Panjab wrote a letter to Government of British India about the Googaira Mutiny and mentioned Rebel tribes Kharal,Fatwana and Kathia are of Jatt
1031:
20th Century British colonial ethnologist H. A Rose, who writes that the Kharals would appear to be a true Rajput tribe, though a very considerable portion of them are styled Jat. (A glossary of the tribes and castes of the Punjab and North-West frontier
830:
Also the new sources you added are very good in strengthening article however when you are free please add the page numbers as well. Also last thing the origin theories should not be discussed in the introduction. Rather in the body.
895:
Even though there are sub-clans that moved from the north of Punjab to the south (e.g. Khar) who claim Jat status, that doesn't mean they are Jat by origin, as they 'changed' caste to assimilate. I am a Kharal from Pind Dadan Khan.
573:
Secondly almost all of the sources you have quoted in your most recent edit cannot even be used on wikipedia. Assuming good faith and since you are a new user, I will go through each of the ones that I am going to remove:
598:
Thirdly, you absolutely cannot add your interpretations or knowledge of any information without a adequate source. You cannot quote blogspots or other wikis. You cannot also not remove other sources like you were doing
578:
Pathan Recruiting District, Scientific Memoirs by Officers of the Medical and Sanitary Departments..., Panjab Castes, A Glossary of the Tribes and Castes of the Punjab..... Indian census all of these will be removed.
661:
Of the 14 sources mentioned with Kharals origin as Rajputs 7 are modern while 7 are past historical texts of British. So how could you say that there is no support of British colonial records with Modern writings.
892:"By caste, the Kharals are Rajput of the Agni-Kula descent. They link up their genealogy with Karan, a chivalrous character from Ramayana and were converted by Makhdoom Jahanian Shah Shareef." (Kharal and Berkley).
515:. What the sources say is that some Kharral identify as Jatts others as Rajputs, you are not allowed to remove refffed material nor are you allowed to spin your own narrative not found in the sources, Thank you. --
1153:
Bro rajput is regional tittle adopted by dominant tribe from particular area and second thing is khokhar is just am independent tribe which hold jat status ,but I don't know much about of gakkhars or janjua
449:
It's right that majority of Kharal family is attached with agricultural due to royal thinking. Now Kharal family taking interest in modern word as well as modern business. ′Rai Shakir Ul Hassan Kharal′
1035:
By caste, the Kharals are Rajput of the Agni-Kula descent. They link up their genealogy with Karan, a chivalrous character from Ramayana and were converted by Makhdoom Jahanian Shah Shareef. (Kharal and
1028:
I understand what you are talking about but there are numerous mentions of Kharals as Rajputs by origin. Confusion might be due that they claim Jat in terms of agricultural profession, not by caste.
584:
3. Please add the page # for the sources you cite, Son Preference: Sex Selection, Gender and Culture in South Asia is an excellent source please add the page number as soon as you have some time.
1194:
proof Secretary of Chief Commissioner of Panjab wrote a letter to Government of British India about the Googaira Mutiny and mentioned Rebel tribes Rai Ahmed khan Kharal are of Jatt lineage.
581:
2. You cited 2 works of Caste based pseudo Historians: Origins and History of Jats... and The Rajputs: History, Clans, Culture, and Nobility these are also by concensus not to be cited.
534:
Jatt source 5 : not even Kharal word used. source 6 : the article is not even about kharals or any of Punjab castes source 7: can't access full article meaning no evidence available.
1042:
If a sub-clan of the Bajwa or Gondal tribe (which are Jat by caste) settle in the north Punjab, Pakistan, further claiming Rajput status. Would that make them Rajput? Answer is, no.
493:
Kharals are Rajput not Jatt they are Jatt in the sense that they are agriculturalists and all agriculturalists in Punjab are called Jatts but as professionally not because of caste.
1174:
This genealogy record (it is colonial) being sourced by Jatland (Jat site) states that Rai Ahmad Khan's lineage is from Punwar, an ancient Rajput clan. What do you think about this?
981:
i just want to clear there was no kharal rajput even in early contemporary records they were just mentioned as jat and later in timeline they continuosly start using rajput tittle
1358:
914:
Adding mention of Jats to the article does not imply that Kharals originated from Jats, just that many Jats claim to be Kharals today, even if the tribe was originally Rajput.
587:
4. The sahiwal Municipal corporation seems to have copied an older wikipedia version of the Kharal article. And it also calls the Kharals Jats in the same page if you go below.
710:
If you are an old user (which is problematic as that means you are using a sock) it should mean that you know better than to add British colonial era sources which has been a
1139:
right that alot of tribes who were of Jat status became Rajput, which includes Kharals. Does that mean the Gakhars, Khokhars and Janjuas are Jat who became Rajput later?
1343:
1298:
can be cited in the caste-related article. So while editing, please keep this in view and select post-independence references. Thanks in advance for understanding this.
168:
44:
323:
622:
identifying as Jats does not negate your belief of their "Rajputness". Rather we are just following normative procedure and puritanically sticking to the sources. --
665:
I say stop this vandalism and now don't undo my changes I have added comment of H.A Rose on Kharals. Its importance is undeniable, its reliability is unrejectable.
375:
371:
357:
608:
Fourthy, I dont know why you are removing their traditionally pastoral references both of which are reliable and largely increase the credibility of the article.
174:
928:
To quote colonial gazetteers and the like authored by individuals who would never be allowed the position of a clerk back in Britain doesn't help the case.
530:
There are 7 sources attached with the declaration that Kharals are Jatts in first paragraph. I didn't found a single sentence saying Kharals are Jatts.
1338:
996:
There are numerous reports that mention Kharals are of Rajput status. It was stated that some of them styled as Jats after moving towards the south.
950:
Also, your region - Jhelum, Chakwal, Bhimber, - basically the regions once referred to as "the country of the Gakhars" or the "extensions of Jammu"
792:
And how to find if wiki community has consensus on something. And I have old British era colonial records mentioned on many other articles/pages.
144:
1353:
281:
271:
668:
please stop this vandalism by removing sourcese I add, I have not removed any of yours sources which are even not about tribal information.
1087:
1363:
874:
Explain why you removed mention of Kharals also being a Jat clan from the article. Kharals being Jats is supported by reliable sources.
1348:
135:
115:
1071:
Not fake, they are sourced. More sources (even government census) state that Kharal are rajput but some sub-clans adopted Jat title.
1057:
considered kharal tribe as jat because rajput is regional tittle adopted by many caste through the process of rajputisation thankyou
324:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150715010931/http://archives.dailytimes.com.pk/national/08-May-2006/they-hate-love-legend-mirza-sahiban
1312:
Alright. I think we should just remove Jaati affiliation in the introduction and let the history and description part address that.
475:
731:
As such I am going to have to remove them again, I hope you think critically of what I have said and reread my previous comment. --
511:
we only stick to the sources we have on Knowledge. Furthermore, the references you are citing are beyond unreliable. See the
327:
418:
90:
63:
28:
459:
246:
236:
197:
654:
These are the sources I have attached to prove Kharals as Rajputs. Check how many are modern and how many are not.
59:
964:
941:
455:
716:
Even on this page, Senior editors(now admin) such as Sitush have removed British colonial sources whenever added
374:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
856:
797:
783:
768:
689:
675:
645:
544:
498:
1091:
750:
Ok I will not cite British colonial era sources but why did you remove the modern sources such as the books:-
960:
937:
1103:
F. B. Wace and F. O. Bourne, authors of the Montgomery Gazetteer 1933 edition describe the tribe as follows:
409:
315:
1100:
Zaroor. By caste, we are Rajput but because of some our agricultural traditions, we are referred to as Jat.
479:
78:
1255:
1199:
1159:
1129:
1062:
1019:
986:
919:
879:
51:
852:
813:
793:
779:
764:
705:
685:
671:
641:
558:
540:
494:
62:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
1236:
Why did you delete infobox? If you don't mind me asking, what is your zaat and qabila/biradari? Thanks.
393:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
381:
96:
1291:
1251:
1195:
1171:
1155:
1125:
1058:
1015:
982:
314:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1303:
1294:
I have no views regarding whether Kharals are Rajputs or Jats. I only want to inform that in no case
836:
736:
627:
520:
348:
932:
the same sentence, HOWEVER, 'Kharal' and 'Jat' do appear in the same sentence on numerous occasions.
711:
442:
55:
1313:
1287:
1265:
1237:
1215:
1180:
1140:
1122:
1107:
1072:
1043:
1012:
997:
911:
897:
871:
756:
2.Origins and History of Jats and Other Allied Nomadic Tribes of India: 900 B.C.-1947 A.D.(2008).
143:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
378:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
394:
1317:
1269:
1241:
1219:
1184:
1144:
1111:
1076:
1047:
1001:
915:
901:
875:
401:
1299:
832:
732:
623:
516:
328:
http://archives.dailytimes.com.pk/national/08-May-2006/they-hate-love-legend-mirza-sahiban
438:
360:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
400:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1332:
1295:
508:
1177:
537:
Please recheck all things and then talk to me with your so called reliable sources.
20:
512:
228:
140:
1039:
These are just some and there are much more. This has been discussed in the page.
1121:
jat in lots of reliable source you need to do more research on topic thank you.@
367:
40:
366:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
218:
127:
109:
433:
Kharal tribal lived all over the Pakistan. majority of this tribal live in
212:
191:
889:
Hello. Kharals are Rajput by descent, which is supported by many sources.
36:
307:
760:
it deserves its place in first paragraph as its about their origin.
244:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
241:
32:
72:
15:
1321:
1307:
1273:
1259:
1245:
1223:
1203:
1188:
1163:
1148:
1133:
1115:
1095:
1080:
1066:
1051:
1023:
1005:
990:
968:
945:
923:
905:
883:
860:
840:
801:
787:
772:
740:
693:
679:
649:
631:
548:
524:
502:
483:
463:
446:
437:. maximum people of this tribal attached from Agriculture.
423:
333:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
684:
And I am not new I have a new user for a specific reason.
318:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
50:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
1264:
Nice to meet you to. I am a Kharal from Pind Dadan Khan.
753:
1. Rajputs: History, Clans, Culture and Nobility.(2005)
31:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
715:
311:
1250:
i am bhinder jat from haryana india nice to meet you
139:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
507:You can’t draw your own conclusions that is called
370:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
173:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1178:https://www.jatland.com/home/File:HARose.p497.jpg
959:particular the areas immediately bordering them.
763:I am not that old user I have 200+ edits before.
240:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
356:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
1359:Stub-Class India articles of Low-importance
866:Users deleting mention of Jats from article
306:I have just modified one external link on
186:
104:
76:
1344:Unknown-importance Anthroponymy articles
188:
106:
345:to let others know (documentation at
7:
234:This article is within the scope of
133:This article is within the scope of
95:It is of interest to the following
1214:Can you send the sources, thanks.
153:Knowledge:WikiProject Anthroponymy
14:
310:. Please take a moment to review
156:Template:WikiProject Anthroponymy
1339:Stub-Class Anthroponymy articles
221:
211:
190:
126:
108:
77:
19:
276:This article has been rated as
861:10:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
841:15:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
802:17:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
788:17:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
773:17:12, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
741:16:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
694:17:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
680:17:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
650:17:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
632:15:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
549:15:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
525:12:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
503:08:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
1:
1354:Low-importance India articles
484:17:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
429:Kharal Foundation of Pakistan
147:and see a list of open tasks.
64:contentious topics procedures
1296:British colonial era sources
424:22:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
256:Knowledge:WikiProject India
141:the study of people's names
1380:
1364:WikiProject India articles
969:11:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
946:11:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
387:(last update: 5 June 2024)
303:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
282:project's importance scale
259:Template:WikiProject India
175:project's importance scale
1349:Stub-Class India articles
936:Multan, Delhi, and Agra.
924:07:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
464:01:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
447:16:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
275:
206:
172:
121:
103:
66:before editing this page.
1322:15:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
1308:15:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
1274:07:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
1260:03:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
1246:16:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
1224:13:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
1204:17:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
1189:16:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
1164:17:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
1149:15:42, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
1134:14:46, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
1116:12:59, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
1096:04:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
1081:07:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
1067:03:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
1052:16:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
1024:14:45, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
1006:04:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
991:04:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
952:on the fringes of Punjab
906:04:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
884:03:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
714:for Multiple years now.
136:WikiProject Anthroponymy
60:normal editorial process
456:Rai Shahid Abbas kharal
299:External links modified
47:as a contentious topic.
85:This article is rated
56:standards of behaviour
977:Kharals Rajput or Jat
159:Anthroponymy articles
368:regular verification
52:purpose of Knowledge
489:Kharals are Rajputs
454:Great Dear Brother
358:After February 2018
337:parameter below to
961:PanjabiEdmundBurke
938:PanjabiEdmundBurke
412:InternetArchiveBot
363:InternetArchiveBot
91:content assessment
29:contentious topics
388:
296:
295:
292:
291:
288:
287:
237:WikiProject India
185:
184:
181:
180:
71:
70:
43:, which has been
1371:
817:
709:
562:
422:
413:
386:
385:
364:
352:
264:
263:
260:
257:
254:
231:
226:
225:
224:
215:
208:
207:
202:
194:
187:
161:
160:
157:
154:
151:
130:
123:
122:
112:
105:
88:
82:
81:
73:
23:
16:
1379:
1378:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1329:
1328:
979:
868:
863:
811:
703:
682:
556:
551:
527:
491:
472:
431:
416:
411:
379:
372:have permission
362:
346:
316:this simple FaQ
301:
261:
258:
255:
252:
251:
227:
222:
220:
200:
158:
155:
152:
149:
148:
89:on Knowledge's
86:
54:, any expected
12:
11:
5:
1377:
1375:
1367:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1331:
1330:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1175:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1104:
1101:
1088:117.222.224.81
1040:
1037:
1033:
1029:
978:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
956:
948:
933:
929:
926:
893:
890:
867:
864:
853:MrHyperForEver
851:
846:
845:
844:
843:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
814:MrHyperForEver
794:MrHyperForEver
780:MrHyperForEver
765:MrHyperForEver
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
706:MrHyperForEver
686:MrHyperForEver
672:MrHyperForEver
670:
642:MrHyperForEver
637:
636:
635:
634:
612:
611:
610:
609:
603:
602:
601:
600:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
585:
582:
579:
568:
567:
566:
565:
559:MrHyperForEver
541:MrHyperForEver
539:
529:
506:
495:MrHyperForEver
490:
487:
471:
468:
467:
466:
430:
427:
406:
405:
398:
331:
330:
322:Added archive
300:
297:
294:
293:
290:
289:
286:
285:
278:Low-importance
274:
268:
267:
265:
262:India articles
233:
232:
216:
204:
203:
201:Low‑importance
195:
183:
182:
179:
178:
171:
165:
164:
162:
145:the discussion
131:
119:
118:
113:
101:
100:
94:
83:
69:
68:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1376:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1336:
1334:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1179:
1176:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1124:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1014:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
994:
993:
992:
988:
984:
976:
970:
966:
962:
957:
953:
949:
947:
943:
939:
934:
930:
927:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
908:
907:
903:
899:
894:
891:
888:
887:
886:
885:
881:
877:
873:
865:
862:
858:
854:
850:
842:
838:
834:
829:
828:
827:
826:
815:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
790:
789:
785:
781:
775:
774:
770:
766:
761:
757:
754:
751:
742:
738:
734:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
717:
713:
707:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
691:
687:
681:
677:
673:
669:
666:
663:
659:
655:
652:
651:
647:
643:
633:
629:
625:
620:
616:
615:
614:
613:
607:
606:
605:
604:
597:
596:
595:
594:
586:
583:
580:
576:
575:
572:
571:
570:
569:
560:
555:
554:
553:
552:
550:
546:
542:
538:
535:
531:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
505:
504:
500:
496:
488:
486:
485:
481:
477:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
452:
451:
448:
444:
440:
436:
428:
426:
425:
420:
415:
414:
403:
399:
396:
392:
391:
390:
383:
377:
373:
369:
365:
359:
354:
350:
344:
340:
336:
329:
325:
321:
320:
319:
317:
313:
309:
304:
298:
283:
279:
273:
270:
269:
266:
249:
248:
243:
239:
238:
230:
219:
217:
214:
210:
209:
205:
199:
196:
193:
189:
176:
170:
167:
166:
163:
146:
142:
138:
137:
132:
129:
125:
124:
120:
117:
114:
111:
107:
102:
98:
92:
84:
80:
75:
74:
67:
65:
61:
57:
53:
48:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1292:Wikiwala Jat
1252:Wikiwala Jat
1196:Wikiwala Jat
1172:Wikiwala Jat
1156:Wikiwala Jat
1126:Wikiwala Jat
1059:Wikiwala Jat
1016:Wikiwala Jat
983:Wikiwala Jat
980:
951:
916:ThethPunjabi
876:ThethPunjabi
869:
847:
791:
776:
762:
758:
755:
752:
749:
683:
667:
664:
660:
656:
653:
638:
618:
536:
532:
528:
492:
473:
434:
432:
410:
407:
382:source check
361:
355:
342:
338:
334:
332:
305:
302:
277:
247:project page
245:
235:
229:India portal
150:Anthroponymy
134:
116:Anthroponymy
97:WikiProjects
49:
26:
476:36.255.45.5
349:Sourcecheck
41:Afghanistan
1333:Categories
1300:Sutyarashi
1032:province).
833:Nawabmalhi
733:Nawabmalhi
624:Nawabmalhi
517:Nawabmalhi
474:Hi hassan
419:Report bug
87:Stub-class
45:designated
1036:Berkley).
1011:lineage.@
712:consensus
470:Hi hassan
439:Raisufian
402:this tool
395:this tool
58:, or any
617:Lastly,
408:Cheers.—
37:Pakistan
1314:Kharal1
1288:Kharal1
1266:Kharal1
1238:Kharal1
1216:Kharal1
1181:Kharal1
1141:Kharal1
1123:Kharal1
1108:Kharal1
1073:Kharal1
1044:Kharal1
1013:Kharal1
998:Kharal1
912:Kharal1
898:Kharal1
872:Kharal1
619:even if
599:before.
335:checked
312:my edit
280:on the
955:rule).
509:wp:NOR
435:Punjab
343:failed
308:Kharal
93:scale.
39:, and
513:wp:RS
253:India
242:India
198:India
33:India
1318:talk
1304:talk
1270:talk
1256:talk
1242:talk
1220:talk
1200:talk
1185:talk
1160:talk
1145:talk
1130:talk
1112:talk
1092:talk
1077:talk
1063:talk
1048:talk
1020:talk
1002:talk
987:talk
965:talk
942:talk
920:talk
902:talk
880:talk
857:talk
837:talk
798:talk
784:talk
769:talk
737:talk
690:talk
676:talk
646:talk
628:talk
545:talk
521:talk
499:talk
480:talk
460:talk
443:talk
339:true
27:The
376:RfC
353:).
341:or
326:to
272:Low
169:???
1335::
1320:)
1306:)
1272:)
1258:)
1244:)
1222:)
1202:)
1187:)
1162:)
1147:)
1132:)
1114:)
1094:)
1079:)
1065:)
1050:)
1022:)
1004:)
989:)
967:)
944:)
922:)
904:)
882:)
859:)
839:)
831:--
800:)
786:)
771:)
739:)
692:)
678:)
648:)
630:)
547:)
523:)
501:)
482:)
462:)
445:)
389:.
384:}}
380:{{
351:}}
347:{{
35:,
1316:(
1302:(
1290:@
1286:@
1268:(
1254:(
1240:(
1218:(
1198:(
1183:(
1170:@
1158:(
1143:(
1128:(
1110:(
1090:(
1075:(
1061:(
1046:(
1018:(
1000:(
985:(
963:(
940:(
918:(
910:@
900:(
878:(
870:@
855:(
835:(
816::
812:@
796:(
782:(
767:(
735:(
708::
704:@
688:(
674:(
644:(
626:(
561::
557:@
543:(
519:(
497:(
478:(
458:(
441:(
421:)
417:(
404:.
397:.
284:.
250:.
177:.
99::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
