42:
178:
I can't fault this article and I see that the only reason it failed GAN last year was because it then had insufficient information about the Battle of the
Denmark Strait. That has been rectified in the interim. It meets all the criteria and is an interesting, informative and well-written article with
47:
80:
126:
159:) 19:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC) I will review the article but have no immediate comments. I am currently on a short holiday and will begin the process in a few days time. --
70:
122:
52:
107:
99:
75:
156:
115:
17:
92:
184:
164:
150:
188:
168:
180:
160:
146:
179:
good verification and no problems. It passes easily. Well done to all concerned. --
134:
103:
8:
30:
61:
33:
7:
24:
1:
18:Talk:HMS Prince of Wales (53)
204:
189:18:29, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
169:19:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
89:
88:
195:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
203:
202:
198:
197:
196:
194:
193:
192:
176:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
201:
199:
175:
172:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
200:
191:
190:
186:
182:
173:
171:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
177:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
147:BrianDeeG
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
157:contribs
76:Criteria
127:history
108:history
94:Article
174:Review
181:Brian
161:Brian
136:Watch
16:<
185:talk
165:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
187:)
167:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
183:(
163:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.