Talk:Hospitality Club - Knowledge (XXG)

4602:"Trip to the country from which the foreigner is not required, you only need to provide the necessary documents (eg. the Imam), which are taken to the country of the foreigner and there based on the original certificate is issued in an illegal marriage (by a corrupt official). With this document the relationship is legalized in the registry office in the target country, and authentic copy of the marriage certificate is sent to an alien country where it serves as a basis for applying for a visa. One way to authenticate the stay is to establish contact via the Internet with the resident EU offer accommodation in their homes and apartments. This is done inter alia through the website www.hospitalityclub.org. Individuals who invite foreigners this way, do not they carry them and it does not charge any fees (or take a small amount associated with the invitation). And foreigners can move freely within the EU's MS without the need to register their stay ." 2313:. From what I know Alex and Guaka have both published emails from other people and Hospitality Club volunteers on their private websites in some fight for "democracy" and against "censorship" in HC (Guaka ironically even licensing those emails from other people as public domain; and then even referencing his personal blog here as "source" - I mean, come on guys, how ridiculous is it gonna get??). And here they keep adding and adding negative stuff about a great site. I will remove some of that, as it is clearly a personal thing of you two. Posting only negative (but factually verifiable) information on a topic, or specifically focusing on negative things without giving the other side IS having a POV - and we all agree that we'd better stick to 203: 179: 326:

and the growth went to linear (which seems also very strange for such a kind of project). I think this is because the graph was made only from a few data points and then fitted with a curve in a statistically wrong way. It's important to at least include the data points (e.g. as crosses or circles) and preferably drop the fit line at all. Or think of some model of the growth and fit the data with this. If this is the issue, I offer to help with this (and make a nice graph) to whoever posted the original and has access to the data it was made from.

99: 81: 109: 259: 3243:

He eagerly promoted in July 2012 the partnership - resented by most members - with the Californian hôtel broker Airbed & Breakfast , yielding HC a provision with every booking. The broker's profit scheme contrasts diametrically against HC's and its members' idealism; apart from advertising for their own competitor, as each bed can either be marketed with profit, or be ceded for philanthropic reasons for free.

3113: 4279:

satisfying solution to have to pretend that the service still is working and relevant. I can understand that the Wayback Machine is not a perfect provement since the site could have worked between the captures, although it is rather unlikely if there is no different capture in between. Otherwise if you just report that the Wayback Machine didn't capture any working login in that time interval, is it really

3957: 50: 21: 3041:"In June 2006 a group of highly involved HC volunteers set up HCvol, an NGO, "where volunteers can organize their work in a democratic and transparent way. " was removed by Amarent with the justification: "and guaka does it again. Why don't you add some critical notes to the CS article, instead always add "facts" to the HC one here?)". 4435:

for website projects, blogs etc. and maybe also non internet related things it will happen that they become abandoned and irrelevant, and it might be difficult to write about this if the rules are not clear. It might be interpretation if mentioning captures of sites like the Waybackmachine or some uptime-checkers really are

873:

I feel it's inappropriate to use your own blog as a source, don't you think so ? As for the fact that the messages are being monitored for spam (and this feature can be turned off) I think they are very clear about it. Maybe you've just not set it in your preferences setting or read HC's disclaimer ? --

4419:

Clearly it is in the best interest of readers to give some sort of indication in the article that the website appears to no longer be functioning, so it comes down to the best way to do it. A direct statement that it is offline is WP:OR, strictly speaking, but as I see it, as long as we make it clear

4405:

No, we do not need a decision 'now'. This is actually an interesting question. Not because it matters much for this particular article, but because it is liable to become a more significant one generally, as Knowledge (XXG) content gets older. It may well be that some form of policy change is needed,

4225:

The problem is that Hospitality Club does not really work anymore. But there hasn't been any official statment, because the creator(s) of the project just abandoned it. So, no one takes care about the portal anymore, since February 2021 the login did not work anymore, and since April 2022 the page is

3807:

But i am participating in the discussion. You claim in editing against consensus - I'm not - or against 'established policy' without casting to explain what that policy may be. You clearly do recommend escalating without any clear reason apart from an obvious failure to AGF towards me. So again, what

3657:

Wowsers. I'm glad you never refereed and football match I played! My edits were not against any established consensus on this article, it Indeed any policy. The addition as it is is obvious original research. Stating "was" in the opening para is enough, the rest simply doesn't need to be there unless

3242:

90 % of members are inactive - a fact that can be ascertained by clicking the profiles. Personally, founder Veit KUEHNE will not disclose his finances not the club's structures (2), or prove the "thousands of volunteers" ' real existence. Volunteers that left, complain of unbearable conditions (3).

3162:

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on

2353:

as long as he is involved in HC. The mails itself were definitely not personal. The publishing was not personal either. I didn't relicense under Public Domain, but my wiki is licensed under Creative Commons. I also don't care so much about copyright law as for instance Valmi, who seriously threatened

1651:

Well, actually it was also suggested because there was mention of other hospitality exchange sites before (something like "messages containing links to other hosp. ex. sites are supposed to be removed"). This was removed. So maybe someone else can write something about the relationship between HC and

1605:

section? The link you gave in the comment does not exist. I presume there has been some discussion about this before?! Still I think it makes perfect sense to let readers know about Wiki pages of similar organisations which by the way also link to HC and each other. I know HC does not like to promote

4617:

This article is a pretty poor source in very badly written English. It's only a passing mention for HC, for what is broadly an extraordinary claim that HC is a route for Ismalic terrorists to get visas. There's no indication in the source the HC is actually used this way by terrorists, just that it

3451:

The problem is that no one officially buried the project. And it doesn't seem relevant enough anymore that it gets some media coverage or a obituary. However, there is the fact that it is disfunctional for years, which is a relevant information. The big question is which source we could use to prove

2044:

I removed the "See Also" section that Guaka just added, because we have discussed it in the past already when Guaka (the same one) had suggested that we should remove it. Since there was a consensus then to remove it and that nobody reopened the discussion, I assume that putting it back was a simple

1246:

As of quoting Veit on Knowledge (XXG), here is a totally unobjective suggestion: since a private email accounts to a private conversation and being forwarded a private email accounts pretty much to overhearing a private conversations, I suggest that you write: "Kühne was overheard as saying during a

1236:

Sweet. After copying my private email to your website you are now diffamating me of Knowledge (XXG). To set the record straight for those that were not involved, I would have deleted it for sure but I didn't because the page was protected, and I explicitely stated in my email to your web hoster that

872:

Hi, I have the feeling that you are disappointed with HC and are trying to express this personal emotion of yours in the article here. While I do not want to endorse censorship, I don't think the article is the proper place to discuss whether what you've experienced there was censorship or not. Also

325:

I agree it's nice to have a graph there. But the current version is very strange. It seems to imply that before the 03/2005 the growth more or less followed a logistical curve, with expected saturation value somewhere around 35 thousand people. Then in this month something very very strange happened

4434:

Thank you for your useful input. I agree that this will become more significant as Knowledge (XXG) content gets older. Like I said I noticed many abandoned software projects. These sites often have a "latest release" date in the info block, so you'll notice there if the project is outdated. However

4263:

to track it, and it's easily verifiable by the fact that no one else would be able to reach the page either. We have articles on plenty of defunct websites, and don't need a gold-standard reliable source saying "this website is defunct" to call them such. However, I would avoid more detail than the

3248:

90 % of members inactive since years, even some major cities have but 1 - 10 active hosts left (4). - Bed requests using the official channels may take 6 months or more - all communications are being spam-tested, which purportedly takes time. - Last not least, all improvement schemes of motivated

2487:

Valmi, experience tells that there is quite often a difference between what is written on HC and how it is in reality. Yes, a good start is to read around there and not to take anything to literal. Why don't you quys actually not work on making the club more transparent? I think it would save you a

1717:

It's anarchy at its best: you want a logo, you draw a logo and you use it. Seriously, if you spotted one "unofficial" logo that was used more than the others in camps and seemed generally accepted, I think it would be interesting to add it to the article. You could call it "the logo members created

1523:

discussion page but I doubt anyone checks there often and the relevant people discuss here. I am wondering if a seperate entry for Veit is really appropiate in an encyclopedia. After all he is not that an important person. Isn't it enough to mention his name here? I suggest to delete that entry but

935:

Well, I trust in people organising. If Knowledge (XXG) were managed by Jimbo himself, many problems would have arisen and it wouldn't have grown so big, I think. There are many possible problems I can think of, when there's just one person personally responsible and liable, for that person himself,

599:

I wasn't aware that it was Guakas blog no. I added it because I had been given the url by someone else in the club who had expressed dissatisfaction with the way it was run (If you'd like to contact me through the site I will give you his name, but I'd prefer not to write it on this talk page). You

2434:

HC volunteers who read messages sent to members who didn't uncheck their spamcheck. So most messages, considering it's checked by default. Not clear how many people (let alone who, how many times, or whose messages...) can actually read other people's messages, but for 140000 people this must be a

1963:

If you put a whole new article online that contains mostly false statements, I expect it would be speedily deleted, yes, indeed. Besides, things that are false don't become true just because somebody says it. There might very well be somebody else that says something else. Sources need to be a bit

1219:

For the second one, about which Veit writes "I took out the parts that have me as a "source" - sorry, but I think I ain't gonna be that source.". I was forwarded the email written by Veit stating this was forwarded to me. I put it online on my wiki, and it was removed by Veit and Valmi. I was even

1008:

I really think that we need a discussion about the criticism part. I am a hc member and cs member and was surprised to read that there these rivalries. i checked guakas arguments and saw that indeed quite a few people were unhappy with the way the hospitality club is run. also the censorship thing

819:

that HC claims different than they act and are, this also covers given information by HC about structure, users security and many other topics.. It showed to be necessary to double check any given information by HC (which is most of the time 'fungous') with other sources, which also incl. personal

408:

Oops, I just added the link. But please remove if it at will. I'm currently writing another article, after I got some reactions which were quite shocking for me, like people not being able to send or receive messages at all. And harsh critique about the structure of the organisation of HC. But I'm

3507:

Maybe we can write: "Since ... the Internt Archive has only captured SQL-Errors for the login page, Saashub shows the page offline since 24 April 2022." This is just describing the given facts without any further conclusion and in my opinion this is also relevant. Also it would be more helpful if

1905:

Well, yeah. I actually reverted and started this heading since the deletion included something that clearly wasn't false (quote from HC.org). The other part, well, that's the exciting part, and I know that I can't cite that source. I hope that the next revert doesn't include other tidbits that do

343:

It is fixed now. The graph explains data are taken daily and the early data are only an estimate in the caption. My early objection that it is important to differentiate between data points and fit line was not correct, because the sampling frequency is actually so high that all the points on the

4078:

stipulates that no content may be added without a reliable source providing the information, which at first hand might seem obvious that this is not the case here, and thus it shouldn't be included. On the other hand, I sincerely doubt that there would be any sources indicating the service to be

3719:, now I request you stop interacting with me unless it is mandated/recommended by Knowledge (XXG) policies, as clearly you're not willing to have a civil conversation with me. Also, please stop vandalizing my Talk page. If you can't stop doing this I won't hesitate to ask for AIV/AIN assistance. 2168:

2) When you say "The founder prefers not to speak about bad experiences." would you please be kind enough as to provide a quote from your source? This source is uncheckable as it is and makes no sense to the reader because this is the English version of the Knowledge (XXG) encyclopedia, you see.

2329:

Without a registered username doesn't mean anonymous, sometimes it shows more than a registered username which hides the IP to the large public. Yes, a neutral point of view and a bit objectivity against all networks is what I try to archive since a long long time. Shame when this includes just

2272:

Regarding a statement from Veit. You will never have any things which are clear and put to the point. I find it a shame that the whole thing is kept in some frog and transparency is not possible. HC will always try to have a clean slate. Take as example the the Wikitravel talk pages where wrong

4278:

The fact that the site even is offline for 1 1/2 weeks now makes it a little bit easier to report that, although we have to watch if it stays like this. However, the discussion started when the site still was online, but not usable since the login didn't work. And in this case it is not a very

3364:

I don't know why you changed this to present tense and removed information that the page does not work anymore, without even participating in the discussion. What prove does it need that the thing does not work? You can't log in for years now, and the website even is offline for 2 days (see

439:

I'm a member of HC myself and I know that you can turn of the mail monitoring for your account there if you want. They also make it clear from the very beginning that mail is being scanned. Knowledge (XXG) article is not the right place to discuss your personal opinion on the club anyway.

1425:

doing it, but anyway I give you a choice of either keeping it as it is, or quoting the full unedited content of both emails I wrote to your hoster, as suits you better. I don't mind you copying this messahe as long as you don't make it look like I mean something else than what I really

3856:

I have nothing to retract since I reject the claim that I failed to assume good faith, and maintain my stance that I only intended to advise them on further steps to take (provided their claim was right). I apologize for poor phrasing on my part and undue conclusions gathered from it.

450:

Yes, but there are people who cannot receive nor send messages at all, regardless of mail monitoring. And this is not my personal opinion... And besides, you removed a lot more than just the lines about mail monitoring. For that you need a bit more justification than just mentioning

4064:

I'm saying that regardless of whether you prefer the article to list that the service is defunct, any wording would be better than what it is right now, since now the article implies definitively that the service has ceased to exist, which is unarguably an even worse violation of

4226:

even offline. The service already lost its popularity in the years before, and there is no media coverage anymore. The result is, that there is no undisputed source which we could use for citation. I did add the information that the service is not functional anymore and used the

1073:

Outdated in what sense? Did I miss something? The last thing I read about this was that messages containing website promotion are to be deleted and that a link to CouchSurfing is supposed to be considered website promotion by HC spam checkers. You wrote it yourself, remember?

2971:"Articles may not contain any previously unpublished arguments, concepts, data, ideas, statements, or theories. Moreover, articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of: published arguments, concepts, data, ideas, or statements — that serves to advance a position." 3249:

members meet grave's silence from Dresden Headquarters, and the founder posts but every couple of years, announcing improvements that never materialize - this deafens whatever initiative (5). The young join CouchSurfing; the dead wood stays (6). Homepage Copyright: 2006 !

1987:

Many members of CouchSurfing regard the network as a dating site, a problem that the founder Casey acknowledges: "Based on what I've seen and heard, these people who come into CS and use it exclusively like a dating site are definitely harming the overall CS experience."

2531:, those are your words, Valmi. Second, I'm only very critical about certain aspects of HC, I never held up being an expert. I don't spend too much reading HC.org. Where does HC.org mention 24 people? And what happens if there is a language none of the 24 people reads? 336:

I don't know what exactly happens, but I do know growth can be irregular because of the aproving process of new members. For example, recently some 20000 new members were put on hold (not included in the statistics, nor full members yet), because of server problems.

344:

line are data points. Now it is explained in the caption so everyone can understand the graph. Also the early esimate is now somehow smothen as not to suggest some strange skip. I'm impressed by the work Francis has put in to gather the correct data. Thank you! --

1666:

I think it would be nice to have the HC logo on the page but I don't know who owns the rights of it. Or maybe a low resolution version could be uploaded like it is done for many company logos. Does any one of you know more about the licensing? What do you think?

2330:

negative facts, but I see it more as an critical point of view with needs to be mentioned. Does HC have anything to hide? This whole fight shows that there is some stuff wrong. Let people make their own judgement. Or why do want to take the user for a fool? alex

2892:, "the obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it". Accordingly, if you have a reputable secondary reference, then could you provide the citation. For the avoidance of doubt 2711:

So why don't you first add all the domains with couchsurfing in them to the relevant article (Couchsurfing)?? I have the feeling that you are simply trying to put HC into a bad light by your comment. I think it was very good that HC tried to help out stranded

3508:

User Unbh gives suggestions how to address the issue in a better way instead of just removing edits without participating in discussions. "No encyclopaeidc information" is a thing that can bee seen differently, and also is, like we see in this discussion. -

475:

How do you know your message was removed because it mentioned CouchSurfing ? Maybe it was removed because of something else ? (BTW: could you try sending me a message through HC with "CoachSurfing" mentioned so that we could see if it gets through or not ?)

2020:

The criticism about cs being a dating site it is totally out of scope. This happens on all social sites. And it does happen on HospitalityClub too for instance. See "Dating: some people really mistake the club for a flirting/partner finding platform." at

3477:

In my opinion (considering 3O was requested) the fact that the service is defunct, is absolutely grounds for inclusion when the article is specifically about said service. Having said that, I would not phrase it the way that it is now, avoiding the term

2934:. Maybe we should ask Veit himself? Or would that be original research again? Just to prove how silly this is: maybe we should remove the mention of 180.000 members in the lead of the article. I mean how do we know the number of members other than from 2435:

considerate amount, I'd say at least 100 or so. It's a mystery to me and many others why spam checking isn't being done using more conventional methods for checking spam. Would save hundreds of precious volunteer time and improve the privacy of members.

2003:

Since Casey wrote it and published it on the net, I suppose that it is an appropriate source for a quotation from Casey, no? If you find something on any Internet forum written and published by Veit, then I would assume that you can quote from it.

2179:

2) The quote is definitely checkable, just ask someone to make a translation. You only need a translation of the part that I added in comments to the article. Or is there some WP:ENGLISH article that says that all references should be in English?

3027:

So, who thinks it is relevant for the article about "hospitality club" mentioning the fact that couchsurfing.info, a web site with just the name of an alternative web site, points to hospitalityclub.org and that was registered by the creator of

4018:

I'd like to add that my recommendation was regarding adding a sentence linking to a source reporting the website as currently offline or unreachable. The current wording using 'was' implies that the service/site has stopped existing which is 1)

2157:"The organization thinks it is "best to have one global network" and has tried to cooperate, sometimes successfully, with other networks. It encourages its volunteers to tell all members they meet through other networks about Hospitality Club." 917:

I don't know. Maybe I'm being naive, but I do not like official organisations, so I see nothing wrong with it. Would having a registered company make you feel better ? I find it easier to trust in people, not in companies or organisations.

2049:

The consensus that disappeared when the article changed. I'm not a fan of See also sections, but I think there should be mention of other networks in the article. Since this is somehow not otherwise accepted, I want a See also section.

461:

They make it clear that your mail is being scanned, but did you expect that they would remove the mail if you mention CouchSurfing? Did you expect that some members, without any negative comment, cannot send or receive messages at all?

2466:

24 people. You consider yourself an expert of the "dark sides of HC" but you never cared to read around the website of HC. I'd love to know how much time you spent trying to figure how many people and who exactly monitor messages. :-D

936:

and also for the whole organisation. It's still doable for a group of 1000 people living in one village, but with 100.000 people all over the world it's practically impossible for those people to personally know the people responsible.

1150:

3764:

that you removed edits without participating in discussions was correct. I only came here because of a 3O request. I don't have personal beef or predispositions towards anyone. If your concern should be with anyone it should be with

4099:

per se as much as it is an indication that this concludes my own views and I realize it's unlikely to end the matter of contention fully, as it doesn't seem like either 'side' is willing to back off of their point. Hope this helps.

1718:

for themselves" or something. Totally in the spirit, and totally legal as far as I know. There will soon be an "official" one coming along with the upcoming website redesign, but I suppose the unofficial logos will survive to it. --

4038:

If I understand you correctly this means we need to add that information (that has been removed) because otherwise there is no verifiable information in the article that gives a clue why this "was" a service (instead of "is")? -

1375:

I think you noticed that your new blog entry still contains lots of illegal content. I hope you'll take a look through the privacy laws that apply in your country and fix everything without anybody having to implicitely threaten

1129:

Listen, why don't we let someone that has not became so involved investigate the claims and rewrite that section of the article? Many editors have contributed to this talk page that could d that. Agreed? Any objective volunteer?

506:

as it is sourced clearly. Explaining that there is no registered organisation is a perfectly valid piece of information to include. Please try to be constructive instead of blanket reverting. I think we're all HC members here. -

4420:

that this is what Knowledge (XXG) contributors have found, rather than a definitive assertion that the website is defunct, WP:IAR would seem preferable. Or a change of policy, which if needed will have to be decided elsewhere.

1736:

I tried it with Glenn's logo and the explanation he gave for it back in 2004. Logos qualify under fair use. I just hope that this was the one logo you had in mind. :-) The "official" HC logo will probably be based on that one.

2412:

This might be somehow unrelated but I was always wondering HOW volunteers check messages for spam. Are they actually reading my mail and then decide whether it is spam or not? Wouldn't that violate privacy? Does anyone know?

2220:

Mit der Sicherheit steht und fällt so ein Club", weiß Veit Kühne. Doch über negative Ereignisse spricht er nicht gern. Lieber verweist er auf das System aus Sicherheitsmaßnahmen, das den Missbrauch des Clubs verhindern soll.

1542:

at this time. To be fully honest, the fact that the article was created by a notable opponent of Kühne not totally without a Knowledge (XXG) agenda is the final argument for me. Hence a listing on AfD would have my support.

3246:

The primary reasons for the disillusionment you find in every forum, every blog are the huge percentage of "dead wood" = inactive members, the snaillike communications, and the leader's inaction and inaccessibility.With :

883:

Of course I am disappointed. But I hope the article just mentions facts. Someone else added the link before I did. When reading HC's disclaimer, is it clear that your message will be removed if you mention CouchSurfing?

4264:

website being down—e.g., its creator's abandonment, logins no longer working—unless those can be attributed to reliable sources. I trust your memory, but those are not verifiable in the same way a site being down is. --

2161:...that you had actually put in yourself. Your edit note did not justify (or indeed say) that you were removing that. Can we know why? Changed your mind about that too? You may consider making a copy of this article in 2063:

I don't know what you mean by consensus disappearing and articles changing. If you changed your mind after asking fellow editors to remove the "see also" section, please be kind enough as to inform us on the talk page.

3886:

Thanks. I didn't have more energy and motivation for it when it's towards someone who's falsely claimed I'm a sockpuppet, called me a precocious editor, involve me being a referee (which has zero relevance here), etc.

329:

If this is not the case and the points on the graph are not a line fit, but actual datapoints, sampled with high resolution, then can somebody please exaplain me what the hell does it mean? What did happen in 03/2005?

2660: 2229:

I got a friend to do a translation of that part. Could you perhaps give more context. Negative aspects is not the same as negative experiences. I welcome better translations. Perhaps a statement from Veit himself? -

1606:

the others on their site and there they can do what they want. But this is Knowledge (XXG) and does not follow HC's policy. Rather should Knowledge (XXG) give the reader the most complete picture possible..., agree?

1620:. That has nothing to do with HC policies, indeed it was suggested by Guaka to remove those links, and Guaka is against those HC policies himself. The links are just made redundant by the existance of a category. -- 4458:

I'd personally be content with BDD's suggestion of just mentioning the site is offline and not replacing present tense with past tense as it is currently I believe. This decreases the urgency for verifiability per

2655: 2651: 2647: 1992:

With a reference from CouchSurfing groups. Is that okay, i.e. cited correctly? If so, why? Because Casey wrote it? Just wanna know what parts from CS groups I can quote. I wouldn't want that part to be removed.

3187:

Could someone update the graph of the numbers of members, please? April 2006 is a long time ago. Otherwise I'd suggest to remove it. After all, the exponential growth of HC is mentioned in the article already.

1035:

Can anyone please tell me why criticism should be forbidden on this Hospitality Club article, while it seems perfectly ok on the German version? There are tons of references. How can one possibly ignore this?

4319:

The information is of potential benefit to the majority of readers, as the article revolves solely around Hospitality Club so any readers would reasonably be interested in knowing the status of functionality.

3841:

No. You made the claim that it was against consensus, and the claim that it was against policy. You are the one failing to assume good faith , not Flexman. Either justify so I can discuss properly or retract.

1928:

Specially when you state yourself that your source for information is what people that you know think that they overheard me saying IRL, nobody will blame me for not volunteering to clean up the mess. --Valmi

3491:

issue entirely since we do not imply that the service has ceased existing but rather that it is not available for use anymore, which is easily attested by simply going to the website URL. Hope this helps.

1091:

Hmm, I don't know how you could have read this email of mine without breaking the article of the civil law of the country from which it was issued concerning privacy, damn it, now that's embarassing isn't

3095:

Should we say that HC is currently down as of May 3rd 2007? It's not a normal outage - the website is out of commission until the db has finished the upgrade to MYSQL 5, which could be days. --Azarethroy

249: 2984:

I'd suggest removing the reference to the registration by Veit, and just mention that it points to the HC forum - there's nothing controversial about those facts, and it's very relevant, in my view. --

4387:

In genereal I think that this still is a problem because many projects (especially software projects) just lose relevance or get abandend and get no media coverage or official statemant afterwards.

677:

is even in the URL you pasted here :) But though I exchange emails with one or possibly more people working on hospitalityguide.net I don't think there is a single line of text there written by me.

1165:

Where can I read more about this? Did the rules change? Why didn't anyone let me know? I'd be really happy to read about this somewhere, and my position towards HC would change significantly. Guaka

3628:

to revert edits without discussion and against consensus and established policy. Consider notifying him on his talk page, if that doesn't work, warn, if that still doesn't get the message across,

4733: 3679:

I fail to see how me being a referee or refereeing any football/soccer match you've played is relevant to the discussion at all. Please don't make it personal, I don't make it personal either.

3159:

is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

2575:

is the direct successor Hospex, the first Internet-based service, operating out of Poland since 1992." Who's right, the Hospitality Club article or the Hospitality Service article...? -- Helen

1822:

might be considered as website promotion and deleted without notice, depending on the interpretation of the volunteer doing the spam control. Some members are upset by this way of functioning.

1061:

As stated in the editnote if you would care to read that, the main problem is this information is outdated. Rewrite it as "there was once a debate about bla bla" if you think it's notable. --

4095:

If you want to further pursue including the subject matter into the article I'd suggest asking for an RfC so that more contributors can opt in and share their thoughts, and no, this isn't a

1447:

Concerning the other email which you suggested to send to anybody that will ask by email, it is obviously out of the question and you will have to even remove that offer from your website.

4330:. It could be considered generally available knowledge if the date of the claim is included (e.g. "as of May 2, 2022..."), you might want to include an {{as of}} tag as others have said. 4238:, and if yes, will we find another way to get more specific about the current situation of the project, or won't we be able to do any updates unless some media will report about this? - 1695:

Uh, I thought there was. At the winter camp in Riga I saw many people with a HC T-shirt and I presumed that was (somehow) official. Looks like I am wrong so forget about it... Thanks, --

2695:

This seems very relevant to me. It's another domain name linking to Hospitality Club. Another domain name that happens to be the name of another hospitality exchange network. Still,

3024:

When there is controversy about inserting or not a piece of information (in this case, the fact couchsurfing.info goes to hospitalityclub.org) the only possible solution is to vote.

4618:

could b. This doesn't belong any where near the article unless these extensive RS that HC is actually being used in this way. The fact that it is mentioned somewhere is not enough.

2357:

I still think HC is great. And I hope you will add more positive things to the article if you think it is out of balance. Please don't remove any "factually veriable" information.

1534:

I didn't want to start the debate because I lack neutrality on the matter, but I agree with you that Kühne is not notable by Knowledge (XXG) standards. Kühne does not qualify as

4197:

Hmm... Ok, seems I did not get the point of your answer as it was quite complicated and I'm not a native speaker, but it seems to make sense to ask for RfC and more opinions. -

2959:

There is a get out clause to the requirement to have secondary sources in articles about that subject. So the official web site of the Hospitality Club can be used according to

3345:

I guess it is possible to change this into past tense. The project has not been worked on for years, some graphics already vanished in 2019, login did not work since at least

1223:

That was enough confirmation for me. How to get enough confirmation for Knowledge (XXG)? Which source, that I can write for, would be accepted? Indymedia, Wikinews, kuro5hin?

2910:

Ok, this starts getting ridiculus. I do not think this rule applies when there is a general consensus that the source is trustworthy. Otherwise we would have to doublesource

2242:

In this context is 'negative Ereignisse' = 'negative incidents'. Veit refers to negative things which has been happening, not about negative aspects about the system. --alex

3961: 31: 3756:

just in case they were not familiar with it. It wasn't ever intended to be a personal attack or an assumption of bad faith to you personally. I merely said that I found it

3272:(6) Kymryt from Philadelphia 4 October 2013: You CAN try to write to the folks at feedback directly. Good luck! You can write a complaint to VEIT - he is the head honcho. 2225:

Security can make or break a club", knows Veit Kühne, but he does not speak willingly about the negative aspects, he only refers to the system which stops abuse of the club

409:

still waiting for a response from the people who asked me and other people to change the "profile summary", which was saying something about the censorship on the forum...

1818:"Messages that are sent to promote other websites or business opportunities" are forbidden as well, as a consequence a message indicating your profile on an alternative 4253:

Since the main reason we prohibit original research is the need for verifiability, I don't think a brief statement about the site being offline would violate that. Use

1337:. Obviously, I was a bit reluctant to quote more from the cease and desist, but if I get permission I'm happy to add some more text, which might be less "diffamating". 4354:

One could go either way in interpreting the guidelines and prior consensus of the community, and I don't think either option is egregious. Just my two cents though.

2305:

It looks like this is simply something personal between (aka alex or 212.120.100.131 - he has been known to do anonymous trolling on many a wiki), Kasper Souren (

1919:

Other Knowledge (XXG) editors are not responsible for classifying what is true and what is not when you add a sentence with many informations of different quality.

1105:

The point anyway, is that the information contained in this email, which by the way was just my opinion (nothing authoritative, you see), is outdated. Reverted. --

570:

Of course it's not yours as it's Guaka's blog. I'm assuming your good faith, FrancisTyers but are you really not aware of what pages are you using for sources ? --

4743: 3383:

I am confused. What are you even talking about? The company was defunct so I changed the status from "is" to "was". Since it was a relatively minor edit, I used

4728: 4713: 243: 155: 2273:

things had been claimed from Valmid, or the 'intern' eMails which had to be deleted and couldn't be used anymore as source for Wiki. Expand the critics page..

3241:

In recent years In the past five years, the number of active members dropt dramatically (1). HC does not publish actual figures, but the grief goes that : -->

1572:

He's sort of responsible for an organisation of more than 100.000 people, growing to 1 million. I think that in itself is enough to have an article about him.

161: 904:

It should be mentioned because it is rather odd for an organization of nearly 100.000 members, don't you think so? What about continuity? Peace&love!

3140:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with 3137: 1014: 2033:

I would remove the criticism altogether or I would suggest to add it to all the social sites that expose a photo: flickr.com, ebay.com, amazon.com, ...

3164: 3156: 3152: 3129: 315:

I added a graph of user growth, personally I think it gives a nice touch to the article, although anyone who disagrees is welcome to remove it... -

4738: 3784:

Also, speaking of assuming bad faith, you baselessly claimed I'm a sockpuppet, while I can assure you this is my first and only account (on WP).

3702:

editor, please let me know which established policy I've broken here before you recommended warnings and dispute resoluton and 'other solutions'

938:

And for this reason it should be mentioned in the Knowledge (XXG) article if an organisation of nearly 100.000 people isn't registered legally.

4723: 4718: 4708: 894:

And regarding your recent addition about HC's DNS and who registered the domain, why do you think it deserves to be mentioned here ? Peace ! --

3168: 1421:

Ah, and considering your "implicit permission seeking" to quote my "implicitely threatening" "cease and desist", you should have contacted me

1213:

According to the founder, there will never be any "commitee" for taking decisions, as long as he is onboard in the club and is involved in it.

766:. But most of the text there is not written by me... :) And in the first article linked to the most important text isn't written by me either. 131: 2589: 2289: 2258: 2091: 4406:

but meanwhile, please give this RfC time to do its job - which is to ask for outside input. It isn't uncommon for an RfC to run for a month.

304:

I think this is just because of mistaking "holidays" for "vacations". And I don't even know, if this sentence was grammatically right... ;)

3201:

Well, I tried to generate another one, but I've mislaid the data for before 2005, so I only have 2005-2007, which hardly seems worth it. -

1557:

I think its a very borderline case, feel free to AfD it but I'll vote neutral or abstain, the chances are the other AfDers will class him

2203:

A bit literal: "With security such a club stands or falls", knows Veit Kühne. But he doesn't like to speak about negative experiences."

2176:

1) That was not my intention. Sorry. Sometimes people make mistakes. Possibly it is because I was editing another version of the article.

718:

Lol yeah, I must be blind or something - It must be said though that I posted the link before even interacting with Guaka on wikipedia...

3304:

Travel Guide: Help and Information<. This is NO wiki and can neither be altered nor expanded; it consists 90 % of terms of contract.

3273: 3223: 1027: 633:

Reading it again, I can see the GuakaBlog. You can remove the reference if you like, but the issue of censorship is also covered here:

4312:

Full disclosure: I could be considered involved, since I replied to the request for third opinion (3O) above regarding the same topic.

3308: 2685:, another hospitality exchange network, appeared to be gone, 30th June 2006, Veit Kuehne (organization: Hospitality Club) registered 268: 189: 4528: 4486: 4471: 4362: 4190: 4108: 4031: 3972: 3934: 3895: 3865: 3834: 3799: 3777: 3727: 3687: 3640: 3564:

There's no need for this at all. It's simply OR. If there aren't sources for it it isn't noteworthy and shouldn't be in the article

3500: 2788:

Seems OR to me as well. Also, not relevant. Thirdly, one does not see similar information in articles about other organisations. --

219: 210: 184: 122: 86: 4308:

Hey, I see that you did go ahead with the RfC! I will briefly sum up my thoughts below to inform other editors of my prior points.

2975:

You appear to be arguing for the inclusion of "previously unpublished arguments, concepts, data, ideas, statements, or theories".

2931: 1500:

I just finished reading "Freedom of Expression", and after reading it I'm quite sure I need to remove anything from my blog. Guaka

3285: 3267: 1208:, although this doesn't cover the full cost of hosting according to the founder, as noone else has insight in financial matters. 820:

experiences, especially as HC is moving to an 'organization' with one million members, in the interest of hospitality exchange.

4748: 2946: 2848: 2612: 2421: 1761: 1701: 1673: 1793: 61: 4753: 3941:

There is no conversation since apart from using your sockpuppet to stir up trouble you refuse to answer any of the questions.

3734:

all I asked is that you tell me which established policy I've broken while recommending that other users warn me or report me

3009:

members that were stranded on the road to contact their hosts/guests during the crash that happened to that website in June.

2192: 2030: 2026: 3346: 2360:

I think your comments about Alex show exactly what you are doing here. So maybe I shouldn't have fed this discussion at all.

4599: 3148: 3120: 3005:"Hospitality Club set up a forum category called "CS Refugees" and a group called "CS Legacy" on its website to help any 1256:

Or I could reiterate my suggestion to let somebody with less POV than you and I write something that they think is fair.

1155:

As Valmi stated, this is no longer the case and as such if it is to be included, it should be done in the past tense. -

1051:

What happened to the part of the article containing information about the deletion of messages containing CouchSurfing?

2196:"Mit der Sicherheit steht und fällt so ein Club", weiß Veit Kühne. Doch über negative Ereignisse spricht er nicht gern. 27: 4234:. Otherwise the initiation was changed from "is" to "was" but without citation. So the question here is: Is it really 2778:

This paragraph appears to be original research, has this information been published previously by a reliable source?

4535:

For me this sounds like we can call the website/project defunct without needing a source if it is obvious anyway. -

3579: 4391:

makes sense but otherwise it's not optimal if you are not able to mention that a project is not working/obsolete.

1939:

I guess it is if there is reference. Would some unverifiable statement mean that the whole article can be removed?

1836:

Cf. "Deletion of messages containing CouchSurfing?" and "Removed pending citation" on this very talk page. --Valmi

962: 4478:

I've also added the Policy tag to this RfC as it clearly regards WP policy and its interpretation at this point.

3015:

was set up to point to the CS Legacy group on Hospitality Club, and as of the 1st of October 2006 still does so."

4649: 4074:

point that including it at all seems to be original research if one were to follow the 'law' by the letter. The

2604:

Interesting... But Guaka, sometimes I get the impression you got too much time down there in South America :) --

2285: 2254: 2087: 2896:

explains that a secondary source would summarize one or more primary or secondary sources. In this context a

2691:. As of 25th August 2006 this domain is still pointing to which was directed to the "CS Legacy" group on HC. " 2301:

Why do two guys keep adding only negative points to this article - can you take your personal fight elsewhere?

67: 49: 3326:

The latest additions contain nearly no sources and look like original research. Please provide some sources.

3277: 3227: 2736:

Your feelings and thoughts are no reason for deletion of well referenced and relevant parts of this article.

1023: 3312: 2872:. Also, do you see similar research in articles about other organisations ? This seems really weird here. -- 821: 762:

to get things clear. It's not finished yet, since I'm waiting for a reaction from the "founding fathers" on

359: 4381:

1 person who does not help to find a solution in the discussion and shows disagreement via reverts instead.

3699: 3567: 2277: 2246: 2079: 763: 4685: 4425: 2383:"Volunteers check the messages being sent across the site to protect members' mailboxes from spam, and to 2346: 2338: 2281: 2250: 2231: 2083: 600:

can find some of the users who are upset by doing a search for "couchsurfing" in the "profile summary". -

395: 4591:

HC is also mentioned as a means for Islamic terrorists travelling to countries with strict visa policies.

4369:

That is a nice summary of the problem, but what we'd need now is a decision. As far as I see now, we have

4080: 3101: 2568: 2430:

Yes, yes (but no), yes. I've been trying to get things clear about this, and as far as I know, there are

4526: 4484: 4469: 4360: 4188: 4106: 4029: 3970: 3932: 3893: 3863: 3832: 3775: 3725: 3685: 3638: 3543: 3498: 3402: 2576: 2162: 1019: 202: 178: 130:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3433:

I've retained the was. THe fact that thes site is not working is not encyclopaeidc information, and is

3125: 2985: 4384:

So, the consent is to mention that the site is offline. Otherwise your decision can change majorities.

759: 108: 98: 80: 4657: 4653: 4607: 4603: 338: 4346: 4004:. Also the answer "Sounds good to me" by Ama does not digresses from the focus of the discussion. - 3264:(5) Kymryt from Philadelphia, 75 years old, Summer 2013: Forum: „Ok, how to make HC a better place“ 3124:

is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under

20: 4372:

1 voice for mentioning that the site was disfunctional for more than a year and is offline now (me)

3752:

that other users warn or report you. I simply notified them of standard procedure when it comes to

3174: 1819: 4179: 4493:

Hm... I don't see that BDD made a clear statment to the issue with present or past tense, is it?

4178:

Do excuse me and I don't have ill intent or want to assume bad faith, but that does kind of seem

4083:

and thus shouldn't be included. And before anyone assumes, no, the discussion/argument we had at

1520: 991: 295:

I don't see why it should be, maybe under a "Holidaying" category, but holidays is just dates...

4642:

In 2017, HC is mentioned as a means for unwanted foreigners travelling to countries with strict

3419:. And user "Unbh" keeps removing information, that the site is not working anymore for years. - 3052: 1843:

Funny, you it's false, but at the same time you're confirming it when speaking to other people.

305: 3926:

So..? You're probably a bunch of things that have nothing to do with the conversation as well.

3080: 4681: 4581: 4540: 4498: 4447: 4421: 4396: 4288: 4243: 4202: 4162: 4148: 4044: 4009: 3513: 3457: 3424: 3374: 3354: 3286:

http://secure.hospitalityclub.org/hc/forum.php?action=DisplayMessage&StartMessageId=312705

3268:

http://secure.hospitalityclub.org/hc/forum.php?action=DisplayMessage&StartMessageId=309882

2503:

You can take the list of the 24 "spam checkers" from the website quite literal if you want. --

2341:, saying messages containing anything related to other hospitality exchange websites (such as 1964:

more solid than that if you want to make original research, which obviously you can't. --Valmi

1896: 1801: 1683: 1584: 1562: 1286: 1190: 1173: 1156: 1009:

needs a discussion within the hospitality club. but does it really belong in an encyclopedia?

976: 722: 637: 601: 546: 508: 423: 399: 381: 316: 296: 4666:

A mention is not a POV. Anything that just says 'was mentioned' is not strong enough anyway

4637: 4460: 4327: 4323: 3716: 3384: 2840:

lookup as a reference as well. Or are you saying a WHOIS entry is not a reliable source??? --

2314: 1892: 1797: 812: 808: 503: 4521: 4479: 4464: 4355: 4183: 4101: 4024: 3965: 3927: 3888: 3858: 3827: 3785: 3770: 3720: 3680: 3633: 3530: 3493: 3389: 2572: 1682:

I don't think HC has an official logo yet. There are many examples at the gallery though. -

4084: 2926:

as registered by Veit is a false information??? Why would they do that? But ok, apart from

2350: 4227: 3331: 3205: 3059: 2667: 2507: 2471: 2031:

http://www.hospitalityclub.org/hc/forum.php?action=DisplayMessage&StartMessageId=53763

2027:

http://www.hospitalityclub.org/hc/forum.php?action=DisplayMessage&StartMessageId=29758

1741: 1722: 1624: 1547: 1472: 1397: 1310: 1269: 1134: 1109: 1065: 857: 846: 114: 4436: 4388: 4339: 4280: 4235: 4231: 4079:

defunct or that it ceased to exist, which might in itself point to the inclusion lacking

4075: 4066: 4020: 4001: 3753: 3629: 3488: 3434: 3141: 2964: 2960: 2893: 2869: 2548:

has put back "keep trust in the network at high levels" again without any justification.

218:

on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the

2022: 1172:

Ask Valmi, I'm not sure if there has been a press release. Feel free to try it out ;) -

807:

is mentioned above and it is in my personal interest to improve hospitality exchange as

4671: 4623: 4554: 4257: 4134: 3946: 3917: 3877: 3846: 3813: 3739: 3707: 3663: 3575: 3442: 362: 3112: 3100:

Here's a reason, which might be referred to from this article. It's in German though.

2927: 2915: 2889: 2762: 4702: 4269: 2914:

information given in any wikipedia entry and I am sure this is not what was meant in

816: 489:

I'm sorry, but your removal of text is totally unjustified! Please restore the text!

2364: 1787:

Some users thinks this is not about cooperation but about removing the alternatives.

258: 4577: 4536: 4509: 4494: 4443: 4392: 4303: 4284: 4239: 4198: 4173: 4158: 4144: 4090: 4055: 4040: 4005: 3823: 3766: 3761: 3619: 3509: 3472: 3453: 3420: 3370: 3350: 3190: 3006: 2939: 2841: 2836:, where exactly is the original research here? By the way, the HC article is using 2809: 2730: 2713: 2696: 2682: 2605: 2414: 2395:

The first part is pretty clear. But I wonder where I can find a reference for this

2342: 2318: 1980: 1780: 1754: 1696: 1668: 1637: 1607: 1525: 3366: 4643: 4463:. I'd let the RfC run a bit longer to see if others still want to pitch in too. 3252:(1) English homepage: 707 000 members - other languages: 328 000 as of 1-1-2014 2976: 2901: 2779: 2628:

My time in South America is finished. And I hadn't really found that myself :)

1037: 345: 331: 4442:

Concerning this issue, I wasn't aware how long a RfC will run, so i'll wait. -

2075:

Vote for a 'See Also' Sektion! Gives the whole thing more transparency. --alex

1826:

Some part is just copy/paste from HC.org. Please give some more justification.

1538:

because he held only a local office and I doubt that his founding HC makes him

422:

Feel free to make any changes you see fit, so long as you can source them :) -

3327: 3202: 3056: 3042: 2996: 2833: 2816: 2737: 2700: 2664: 2629: 2593: 2549: 2504: 2468: 2454: 2404: 2368: 2306: 2204: 2181: 2112: 2051: 1994: 1943: 1907: 1876: 1844: 1827: 1738: 1719: 1621: 1598: 1544: 1469: 1394: 1338: 1307: 1266: 1224: 1131: 1106: 1075: 1062: 1052: 995: 966: 939: 905: 885: 861: 811:

and not particularly for one network, or person/group of people. It has shown

769: 678: 490: 463: 410: 104: 1330:

Well, isn't explicitly stating that you don't want to sue an implicit threat?

4667: 4633: 4619: 4596: 4550: 4345:

If there's no sources reporting on a service/site being down, it may not be

4130: 4071: 4059: 3942: 3913: 3873: 3842: 3809: 3735: 3703: 3674: 3659: 3625: 3571: 3468: 3438: 2873: 2789: 2310: 1334: 919: 895: 874: 571: 525: 524:

Come on guys, you cannot seriously use your own blog page as a source :-) --

477: 441: 4680:

Vague claims made in passing in obscure sources rarely belong in articles.

1779:

Note that this means that a message mentioning an alternative site such as

1601:, why did you remove the links to similar organisations which I put in the 4689: 4675: 4661: 4627: 4611: 4585: 4558: 4544: 4530: 4502: 4488: 4473: 4451: 4429: 4400: 4364: 4292: 4273: 4247: 4206: 4192: 4166: 4152: 4138: 4110: 4048: 4033: 4013: 3974: 3950: 3936: 3921: 3897: 3881: 3867: 3850: 3836: 3817: 3801: 3779: 3743: 3729: 3711: 3689: 3667: 3642: 3551: 3517: 3502: 3461: 3446: 3428: 3410: 3378: 3358: 3335: 3316: 3281: 3231: 3208: 3195: 3177: 3062: 3045: 2999: 2990: 2979: 2949: 2904: 2876: 2851: 2819: 2792: 2782: 2740: 2716: 2703: 2670: 2632: 2615: 2596: 2579: 2552: 2510: 2474: 2457: 2424: 2407: 2371: 2321: 2234: 2207: 2184: 2054: 1997: 1946: 1910: 1899: 1879: 1847: 1830: 1804: 1764: 1744: 1725: 1704: 1686: 1676: 1640: 1627: 1610: 1587: 1565: 1550: 1528: 1475: 1400: 1341: 1313: 1289: 1272: 1227: 1193: 1176: 1159: 1137: 1112: 1078: 1068: 1055: 1040: 998: 979: 969: 942: 922: 908: 898: 888: 877: 864: 824: 772: 725: 681: 640: 604: 574: 549: 528: 511: 493: 480: 466: 444: 426: 413: 402: 384: 365: 348: 319: 4265: 376:'not ... discuss any aspect of the organizations strategy on their page.' 127: 4143:

The given sources are considered reliable enough by the majority here.

2955:

P.S. Of course I am not serious about removing the number of members...

1205: 994:, started by the founder of Hospitality Club, is pretty interesting... 396:

http://www.industree.org/guaka/index.php/Censorship_in_Hospitality_Club

358:

Since somebody deleted the link towards the HC members, here it is: -

215: 3102:

http://www.chip.de/c1_forum/thread.html?bwthreadid=836175&bwpage=1

1875:

Someone I'd trust with my life who met you IRL recently told me that.

4514:"and don't need a gold-standard reliable source saying 'this website 3964:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

3822:

Again, you can take the claim of you going against consensus up with

3597:

Collapsing discussion that digresses from the focus of the discussion

1201: 4182:. Yes I said that, but it completely skips on the rest I said haha. 2945: 2847: 2611: 2420: 1760: 1700: 1672: 1652:

other hospitality sites. It definitely belongs in the article. Guaka

398:- I don't think any of us want it on the front page though do we? - 990:

Just found out CouchSurfing group messages are open to the public.

634: 4636:"pretty poor source in very badly written English"? Is it proven 2897: 804: 214:, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major 3632:

might have other solutions that hopefully will not be necessary.

3136:

Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the

4230:

and some Uptime-Portal for citation, but this was considered as

3912:

you're self evidently precocious, and self admittedly a referee.

1942:

That is just one of my sources, as you know very well yourself.

1783:

will be censored. At least some users thinks this is censorship.

1200:

Hosting for the site is partially paid for by money coming from

3219:= a most conspicuous sign of HOW DEAD the Hospitality Club is! 1333:

Oh, and by the way, I just finished an article about this mess

4157:...especially better than wrting "was" without any sources... 4070:. The more thought I'm giving it the more I'm leaning towards 3261:(4) In Greater Nuremberg , only Gartenfreund is still active. 2900:

lookup would be considered a primary, not a secondary source.

1220:

threatened with a law-suit in Brazil. And I removed the email.

636:... I'm not sure if that is one of Guakas sites too, is it? - 43: 15: 3760:

for you to undo edits and edit war in case the claim made by

2733:, as far as I know. Maybe it needs some restructuring though. 1524:

would like to know what you think about it before I do so...

4439:, but a change of policy might be worth discusing elsewhere. 3111: 3108:

Fair use rationale for Image:HospitalityClub-GobuyanLogo.png

3081:

http://mytravelbook.org/hcvolwiki/index.php/History_of_HCvol

2590:

Reviews Written by Veit Kuehne "veit.net" (Dresden, Germany)

1814:

Removed by Valmi with the justification "rv because false":

257: 3011: 2687: 1237:

I didn't want to sue. (Though I would have every right to.)

961:

heading? I think it's kind of superfluous since there is a

545:

That isn't my blog. I don't have anything to do with it. -

291:

Is there a reason this is listed under Category: Holidays?

4221:

Request for comment on how to deal with project inactivity

3808:

policy do you think my edits to this article have broken?

4069:

than simply stating the site to be offline per <x: -->

2774:

Other domain names paragraph - original research concerns

2191:

The founder prefers not to speak about bad experiences. :

126:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 3416: 3051:

HCVol is now redundant no? Has it not been replaced by

2815:

Why would it not be relevant? It seems relevant to me.

2805:

lookup. That doesn't seem very original research to me.

2545: 719: 3769:

since they claimed you did these things, not with me.

2133:

Oh Valmi, it's great to see how conform you are. _alex

4375:

1 voice for mentioning that the site is offline (BDD)

3962:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

2023:

http://secure.hospitalityclub.org/hc/stopspam.php?x=1

3658:

a relatively source can be found for noteworthiness.

3291:"There are also wiki-like Travel Guide sections ..." 4734:

Start-Class Websites articles of Unknown-importance

3167:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2995:I don't see why this can't be part of the article. 1792:Please provide citations for this information. See 1358:

I don't know. How do you define "implicite threat"?

4129:Not unless you can produce a reliable 3rd party RS 3528:Ah, crap. I have no idea what I was thinking lol. 1540:notorious for his involvement in newsworthy events 248:This article has not yet received a rating on the 160:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1285:Is there an official statement on this matter? - 4000:Majority here has the conclusion that it is not 3624:Sounds good to me. I agree it's unproductive of 1519:I know that this would be supposed to go to the 1753:Nice one! Yes, thats the one I had in mind. -- 1616:I put a couple brackets too many; please see 1047:Deletion of messages containing CouchSurfing? 8: 3157:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline 2488:lot of hassle. alex 23:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC) 4378:1 undecided (if i understand you correctly) 4322:We don't need to list sources to know that 2367:? I do smell some kind of sock puppetry... 502:I've restored the text in the interests of 360:Hospitality club members on Knowledge (XXG) 47: 4338:There's the obvious, glaring 'problem' of 4335:Arguments against inclusion (in my view): 3592: 173: 75: 4576:So, what's now the conclusion of this? - 4087:has nothing to do with my shift in view. 3826:, I shall refrain from further comments. 1189:Removed to talk page pending citation. - 3482:, instead opting for a phrasing such as 2812:there is information about domain names. 3073: 2755: 2365:your only contributions on this article 2363:Why do you know all about NPOV and are 175: 77: 4316:Arguments for inclusion (in my view): 4744:Unknown-importance Computing articles 3121:Image:HospitalityClub-GobuyanLogo.png 2453:to use as a source for this article. 2349:, and one by Veit, saying there will 7: 4729:Unknown-importance Websites articles 4714:Unknown-importance Internet articles 3222:´'Angel.García, Nuremberg / BAVARIA 2699:keeps on removing this information. 2011:By the way: wrong talk page. --Valmi 1583:You can copy and paste this: ~~~~ - 228:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Websites 140:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet 120:This article is within the scope of 3960:There is currently a discussion at 2938:? Any independend second source? -- 2922:, is not reliable and them listing 2729:All those domains are mentioned in 1860:What are you talking about? --Valmi 1593:Links to other hospitality services 66:It is of interest to the following 3415:You changed from "was" to "is" in 3215:SINCE SEPT: 2007 . S I L E N C E ! 2449:...and I don't have any reference 2378:High level of trust in spam check? 2111:This is Knowledge (XXG). Welcome! 1794:Knowledge (XXG):Avoid weasel words 14: 3485:the service has been unavailable. 2351:never be any democratic committee 1618:Talk:Hospitality_Club#See_also.3F 1574:Question: am I an opponent? Guaka 394:I've reverted, here is the link: 3955: 3155:. Using one of the templates at 2944: 2846: 2763:whois info for couchsurfing.info 2610: 2419: 1759: 1699: 1671: 1617: 201: 177: 107: 97: 79: 48: 19: 26:This article was nominated for 4739:Start-Class Computing articles 3341:inactive / not working anymore 3169:Media copyright questions page 760:the new article I'm working on 30:on May 3, 2007. The result of 1: 4724:Start-Class Websites articles 4719:WikiProject Internet articles 4709:Start-Class Internet articles 3282:23:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC) 3232:23:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC) 3196:19:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 3178:02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC) 3138:boilerplate fair use template 3063:14:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 3046:10:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 2991:02:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2438:It violates privacy, but you 1641:11:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC) 1628:21:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 1611:16:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 1588:16:25, 21 February 2006 (UTC) 1566:18:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 1551:15:54, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 1529:13:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 1476:10:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 1401:10:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 1342:16:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 1314:12:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 1290:10:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 1273:10:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 1247:private conversation that..." 999:22:52, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 980:19:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 970:20:55, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 943:18:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 923:17:19, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 909:16:38, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 899:16:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 889:16:38, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 878:16:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 865:18:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 825:12:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 773:16:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 726:16:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 682:16:52, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 673:Please read more careful! :) 641:16:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 605:16:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 575:16:34, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 550:16:31, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 529:16:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 512:16:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 494:16:13, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 481:16:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 467:16:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 445:16:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 427:14:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 414:14:36, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 403:09:15, 14 December 2005 (UTC) 320:16:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 266:This article is supported by 231:Template:WikiProject Websites 143:Template:WikiProject Internet 134:and see a list of open tasks. 4640:? The original sentence was 4520:defunct' to call them such" 3487:or similar. This avoids the 3359:21:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC) 3307:I erased it. - Ángel.García 3303:, and there, very tiny : --> 3165:criteria for speedy deletion 3000:20:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 2585:Reviews of HC and CS by Veit 2153:1) You removed this text... 1228:20:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 1194:21:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1177:18:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 1160:16:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 1138:00:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 1113:00:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 1079:22:34, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 1069:15:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 1056:18:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 963:hospitality service category 385:21:48, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 4549:Yes, in this case I agree. 3387:as it's pretty common use. 3336:06:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 3317:17:45, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 2980:17:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2950:16:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2905:14:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2877:16:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2852:13:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2820:07:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2793:10:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2783:10:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2741:19:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2717:18:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2704:00:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2337:I only published one email 2146:Info removed and info added 4770: 4690:22:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 4676:21:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 4662:14:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 4628:02:55, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 4612:16:14, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 4342:and lack of verifiability. 4139:18:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC) 4111:19:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC) 4049:13:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC) 4034:17:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC) 4014:17:06, 29 April 2022 (UTC) 3975:12:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC) 3951:04:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC) 3937:20:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3922:20:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3898:20:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3882:20:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3868:19:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3851:19:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3837:19:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3818:19:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3802:19:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3780:19:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3744:19:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3730:19:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3712:19:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3690:18:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3668:18:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3643:15:39, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3552:02:57, 29 April 2022 (UTC) 3518:09:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 3503:20:49, 26 April 2022 (UTC) 3462:13:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC) 3447:13:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC) 3429:13:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC) 3411:12:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC) 3379:11:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC) 3301:General information Pages' 3149:the image description page 2918:. So, you are saying that 2633:02:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 2446:when you signed up for HC. 2235:16:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 2208:16:54, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 2185:16:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 2055:21:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1998:16:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1947:21:24, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1911:16:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1900:12:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1880:03:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1848:23:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 1831:00:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 1805:17:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 1765:12:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 1745:10:47, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 1041:16:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 162:project's importance scale 4586:17:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC) 3151:and edit it to include a 2671:11:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 2616:17:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 2597:16:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 2580:15:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2544:Oh, and in the meanwhile 2150:Two things please Guaka: 1726:15:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 1705:15:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC) 1687:15:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC) 1677:15:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC) 1030:) 11:05, 11 January 2006. 366:06:36, 22 July 2005 (UTC) 265: 247: 196: 159: 92: 74: 3209:15:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 3130:explanation or rationale 2801:It's just a matter of a 2553:19:26, 29 May 2006 (UTC) 2511:14:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC) 2475:21:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC) 2458:18:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC) 2425:13:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC) 2408:21:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 2372:21:25, 14 May 2006 (UTC) 2322:19:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC) 1773:Removed pending citation 986:"Check out the original" 299:08:00, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC) 208:This article is part of 4559:00:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC) 4545:07:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC) 4531:00:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC) 4503:16:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC) 4489:12:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC) 4474:12:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC) 4452:18:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC) 4430:12:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC) 4401:08:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC) 4365:00:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC) 4293:22:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC) 4274:15:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC) 4248:14:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC) 4207:09:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC) 4193:14:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC) 4167:11:23, 1 May 2022 (UTC) 4153:11:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC) 4023:and 2) not verifiable. 3630:dispute resolution here 2387:in the organization at 1515:Separate entry for Veit 349:21:15, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 4749:All Computing articles 3116: 2040:See Also strikes again 975:No, I've removed it - 262: 56:This article is rated 4754:All Websites articles 3132:as to why its use in 3115: 2868:Certainly, check out 269:WikiProject Computing 261: 60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 4324:the Pope is Catholic 3698:Since you're such a 3028:hospitalityclub.org? 2045:étourderie. --Valmi 1017:comment was added by 211:WikiProject Websites 123:WikiProject Internet 3872:Excellent nopology. 3484:Since <date: --> 3237:Recent developments 2936:hospitalityclub.org 2656:Daily traffic trend 2571:article says that " 2569:Hospitality Service 2292:) 09:39, 5 May 2006 2261:) 09:31, 5 May 2006 2094:) 09:05, 5 May 2006 1975:CouchSurfing groups 1820:Hospitality service 380:Is this correct? - 3754:dispute resolution 3258:(3) CS discussion 3255:(2) CS discussion 3153:fair use rationale 3117: 3091:Quality of Service 2309:) and the founder 2163:User:Guaka/Sandbox 1891:Exciting, but not 822:AlexanderSteinhart 758:Well, please read 263: 62:content assessment 3988: 3987: 3570:comment added by 3322:Original research 3012:couchsurfing.info 2989: 2930:here is another 2924:couchsurfing.info 2688:couchsurfing.info 2676:couchsurfing.info 2347:should be deleted 2294: 2280:comment added by 2263: 2249:comment added by 2096: 2082:comment added by 1031: 764:this open message 284: 283: 280: 279: 276: 275: 234:Websites articles 172: 171: 168: 167: 146:Internet articles 42: 41: 4761: 4524: 4513: 4482: 4467: 4358: 4307: 4262: 4256: 4186: 4177: 4104: 4094: 4063: 4027: 3968: 3959: 3958: 3930: 3891: 3861: 3830: 3788: 3773: 3723: 3683: 3678: 3636: 3623: 3593: 3583: 3548: 3541: 3539: 3496: 3476: 3407: 3400: 3398: 3194: 3128:but there is no 3083: 3078: 3014: 2988: 2948: 2942: 2937: 2925: 2921: 2850: 2844: 2766: 2760: 2690: 2661:more interesting 2648:Daily page views 2614: 2608: 2573:Hospitality Club 2529:dark sides of HC 2423: 2417: 2339:written by Valmi 2293: 2274: 2262: 2243: 2095: 2076: 1763: 1757: 1703: 1675: 1536:political figure 1010: 676: 457:personal opinion 250:importance scale 236: 235: 232: 229: 226: 205: 198: 197: 192: 181: 174: 148: 147: 144: 141: 138: 117: 112: 111: 101: 94: 93: 83: 76: 59: 53: 52: 44: 23: 16: 4769: 4768: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4699: 4698: 4650:WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV 4593: 4522: 4507: 4480: 4465: 4356: 4328:the sky is blue 4301: 4260: 4254: 4228:Wayback Machine 4223: 4184: 4171: 4102: 4088: 4053: 4025: 3989: 3966: 3956: 3928: 3889: 3859: 3828: 3790:[[User talk:Ama 3786: 3771: 3721: 3681: 3672: 3634: 3617: 3598: 3565: 3550: 3544: 3531: 3529: 3494: 3486: 3466: 3409: 3403: 3390: 3388: 3343: 3324: 3293: 3239: 3217: 3189: 3185: 3110: 3093: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3079: 3075: 3039: 3010: 2940: 2935: 2923: 2919: 2842: 2776: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2761: 2757: 2686: 2678: 2645: 2606: 2592:at Amazon.com. 2587: 2565: 2415: 2380: 2317:here, dont we? 2303: 2282:212.120.100.131 2275: 2251:212.120.100.131 2244: 2218: 2148: 2084:212.120.100.131 2077: 2042: 1977: 1812: 1775: 1755: 1664: 1595: 1581: 1517: 1187: 1049: 1006: 988: 957:Do we want the 955: 858:User talk:Guaka 850: 847:User talk:Guaka 768:Well, peace... 674: 437: 392: 373: 356: 339:User:joostjakob 313: 289: 233: 230: 227: 224: 223: 187: 145: 142: 139: 136: 135: 115:Internet portal 113: 106: 57: 12: 11: 5: 4767: 4765: 4757: 4756: 4751: 4746: 4741: 4736: 4731: 4726: 4721: 4716: 4711: 4701: 4700: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4678: 4592: 4589: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4491: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4440: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4385: 4382: 4379: 4376: 4373: 4370: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4343: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4320: 4314: 4309: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4222: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4097:recommendation 3986: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3782: 3732: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3600: 3599: 3596: 3591: 3589: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3542: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3483: 3464: 3401: 3342: 3339: 3323: 3320: 3292: 3289: 3238: 3235: 3216: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3184: 3181: 3175:BetacommandBot 3109: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3092: 3089: 3085: 3084: 3072: 3071: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3038: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3025: 3017: 3016: 2973: 2972: 2957: 2956: 2953: 2952: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2813: 2806: 2796: 2795: 2775: 2772: 2768: 2767: 2765: 2754: 2753: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2734: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2693: 2692: 2677: 2674: 2644: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2586: 2583: 2564: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2461: 2460: 2447: 2436: 2393: 2392: 2379: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2361: 2358: 2355: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2302: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2217: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2188: 2187: 2177: 2159: 2158: 2147: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2058: 2057: 2041: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2006: 2005: 1990: 1989: 1976: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1940: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1914: 1913: 1906:have sources. 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1838: 1837: 1824: 1823: 1811: 1808: 1790: 1789: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1748: 1747: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1690: 1689: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1631: 1630: 1594: 1591: 1580: 1579:Help for Guaka 1577: 1576: 1575: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1554: 1553: 1516: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1335:on my new blog 1331: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1231: 1230: 1221: 1216: 1215: 1210: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1167: 1166: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1013:The preceding 1005: 1002: 987: 984: 983: 982: 954: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 937: 928: 927: 926: 925: 912: 911: 892: 891: 870: 869: 868: 867: 849: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 767: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 517: 516: 515: 514: 497: 496: 486: 485: 484: 483: 470: 469: 460: 436: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 417: 416: 391: 388: 378: 377: 372: 369: 355: 352: 324: 312: 309: 303: 301: 300: 288: 285: 282: 281: 278: 277: 274: 273: 264: 254: 253: 246: 240: 239: 237: 206: 194: 193: 182: 170: 169: 166: 165: 158: 152: 151: 149: 132:the discussion 119: 118: 102: 90: 89: 84: 72: 71: 65: 54: 40: 39: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4766: 4755: 4752: 4750: 4747: 4745: 4742: 4740: 4737: 4735: 4732: 4730: 4727: 4725: 4722: 4720: 4717: 4715: 4712: 4710: 4707: 4706: 4704: 4691: 4687: 4683: 4679: 4677: 4673: 4669: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4659: 4655: 4651: 4647: 4645: 4644:visa policies 4639: 4635: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4625: 4621: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4609: 4605: 4601: 4598: 4590: 4588: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4560: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4542: 4538: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4529: 4527: 4525: 4519: 4518: 4511: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4500: 4496: 4492: 4490: 4487: 4485: 4483: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4472: 4470: 4468: 4462: 4457: 4453: 4449: 4445: 4441: 4438: 4433: 4432: 4431: 4427: 4423: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4398: 4394: 4390: 4386: 4383: 4380: 4377: 4374: 4371: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4363: 4361: 4359: 4353: 4348: 4344: 4341: 4337: 4336: 4334: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4318: 4317: 4315: 4313: 4310: 4305: 4300: 4299: 4294: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4259: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4245: 4241: 4237: 4233: 4229: 4220: 4208: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4191: 4189: 4187: 4181: 4175: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4164: 4160: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4136: 4132: 4128: 4112: 4109: 4107: 4105: 4098: 4092: 4086: 4082: 4077: 4073: 4068: 4061: 4057: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4032: 4030: 4028: 4022: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3976: 3973: 3971: 3969: 3963: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3935: 3933: 3931: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3899: 3896: 3894: 3892: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3866: 3864: 3862: 3855: 3854: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3835: 3833: 3831: 3825: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3815: 3811: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3800: 3789: 3783: 3781: 3778: 3776: 3774: 3768: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3731: 3728: 3726: 3724: 3718: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3701: 3700:WP:PRECOCIOUS 3697: 3691: 3688: 3686: 3684: 3676: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3656: 3644: 3641: 3639: 3637: 3631: 3627: 3621: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3595: 3594: 3590: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3553: 3549: 3547: 3540: 3538: 3536: 3527: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3501: 3499: 3497: 3490: 3481: 3474: 3470: 3465: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3406: 3399: 3397: 3395: 3386: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3347:February 2021 3340: 3338: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3321: 3319: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3305: 3302: 3299:, your find ' 3298: 3290: 3288: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3274:62.156.40.183 3270: 3269: 3265: 3262: 3259: 3256: 3253: 3250: 3244: 3236: 3234: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3224:62.156.40.183 3220: 3214: 3210: 3207: 3204: 3203:Francis Tyers 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3192: 3182: 3180: 3179: 3176: 3172: 3171:. Thank you. 3170: 3166: 3160: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3147:Please go to 3145: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3122: 3114: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3090: 3082: 3077: 3074: 3070: 3064: 3061: 3058: 3057:Francis Tyers 3054: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3044: 3036: 3026: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3013: 3008: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2998: 2993: 2992: 2987: 2982: 2981: 2978: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2966: 2962: 2954: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2933: 2929: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2888:According to 2878: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2839: 2835: 2832:I agree with 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2821: 2818: 2814: 2811: 2807: 2804: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2794: 2791: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2781: 2773: 2764: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2742: 2739: 2735: 2732: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2718: 2715: 2712:Couchsurfers. 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2698: 2689: 2684: 2680: 2679: 2675: 2673: 2672: 2669: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2642: 2634: 2631: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2595: 2591: 2584: 2582: 2581: 2578: 2577:84.56.161.203 2574: 2570: 2562: 2554: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2530: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2512: 2509: 2506: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2476: 2473: 2470: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2459: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2445: 2442:your privacy 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2410: 2409: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2335: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2300: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2233: 2227: 2226: 2222: 2215: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2195: 2193: 2190: 2189: 2186: 2183: 2178: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2170: 2166: 2164: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2151: 2145: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2056: 2053: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2039: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1996: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1982: 1974: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1948: 1945: 1941: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1912: 1909: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1893:encyclopaedic 1881: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1849: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1829: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1809: 1807: 1806: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1788: 1784: 1782: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1740: 1735: 1734: 1727: 1724: 1721: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1661: 1659: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1642: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1629: 1626: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1609: 1604: 1600: 1592: 1590: 1589: 1586: 1578: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1546: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1527: 1522: 1514: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1402: 1399: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1343: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1315: 1312: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1291: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1274: 1271: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1207: 1203: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1192: 1184: 1178: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1158: 1153: 1152: 1139: 1136: 1133: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1080: 1077: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1054: 1046: 1042: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1020:80.135.45.196 1018: 1016: 1003: 1001: 1000: 997: 993: 985: 981: 978: 974: 973: 972: 971: 968: 964: 960: 952: 944: 941: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 924: 921: 916: 915: 914: 913: 910: 907: 903: 902: 901: 900: 897: 890: 887: 882: 881: 880: 879: 876: 866: 863: 860: 859: 854: 853: 852: 851: 848: 844: 826: 823: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 774: 771: 765: 761: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 727: 724: 720: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 683: 680: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 642: 639: 635: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 606: 603: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 576: 573: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 551: 548: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 530: 527: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 513: 510: 505: 501: 500: 499: 498: 495: 492: 488: 487: 482: 479: 474: 473: 472: 471: 468: 465: 458: 454: 449: 448: 447: 446: 443: 434: 428: 425: 421: 420: 419: 418: 415: 412: 407: 406: 405: 404: 401: 397: 389: 387: 386: 383: 375: 374: 370: 368: 367: 364: 361: 353: 351: 350: 347: 341: 340: 334: 333: 327: 322: 321: 318: 310: 308: 307: 298: 294: 293: 292: 286: 271: 270: 260: 256: 255: 251: 245: 242: 241: 238: 221: 217: 213: 212: 207: 204: 200: 199: 195: 191: 186: 183: 180: 176: 163: 157: 154: 153: 150: 133: 129: 125: 124: 116: 110: 105: 103: 100: 96: 95: 91: 88: 85: 82: 78: 73: 69: 63: 55: 51: 46: 45: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 4682:AndyTheGrump 4641: 4594: 4575: 4516: 4515: 4422:AndyTheGrump 4311: 4224: 4180:cherrypicked 4096: 4081:WP:RELEVANCE 3798:deus1999|]] 3797: 3758:unproductive 3757: 3749: 3588: 3566:— Preceding 3545: 3534: 3532: 3479: 3404: 3393: 3391: 3344: 3325: 3309:93.193.64.66 3306: 3300: 3296: 3294: 3271: 3266: 3263: 3260: 3257: 3254: 3251: 3245: 3240: 3221: 3218: 3186: 3173: 3161: 3146: 3133: 3119: 3118: 3094: 3076: 3068: 3040: 3007:CouchSurfing 2994: 2986:Singkong2005 2983: 2974: 2958: 2911: 2887: 2837: 2810:CouchSurfing 2802: 2777: 2758: 2750: 2731:CouchSurfing 2694: 2683:CouchSurfing 2665:FrancisTyers 2659: 2646: 2588: 2566: 2528: 2450: 2443: 2439: 2431: 2411: 2400: 2396: 2394: 2388: 2384: 2343:CouchSurfing 2304: 2232:FrancisTyers 2228: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2171: 2167: 2160: 2152: 2149: 2043: 1991: 1981:CouchSurfing 1978: 1897:FrancisTyers 1890: 1825: 1813: 1802:FrancisTyers 1791: 1786: 1781:Couchsurfing 1778: 1684:FrancisTyers 1665: 1657: 1602: 1596: 1585:FrancisTyers 1582: 1563:FrancisTyers 1558: 1539: 1535: 1518: 1422: 1287:FrancisTyers 1212: 1199: 1191:FrancisTyers 1188: 1174:FrancisTyers 1157:FrancisTyers 1154: 1149: 1148: 1050: 1012: 1007: 989: 977:FrancisTyers 958: 956: 893: 871: 855: 723:FrancisTyers 638:FrancisTyers 602:FrancisTyers 547:FrancisTyers 509:FrancisTyers 456: 452: 438: 424:FrancisTyers 400:FrancisTyers 393: 382:FrancisTyers 379: 371:New addition 357: 342: 335: 328: 323: 317:FrancisTyers 314: 302: 297:FrancisTyers 290: 267: 220:project page 209: 121: 68:WikiProjects 35: 3750:recommended 2652:Daily reach 2451:hard enough 2389:high levels 2276:—Preceding 2245:—Preceding 2216:Translation 2078:—Preceding 1800:. Thanks - 1521:Veit Kuehne 856:moved from 332:User:hhanke 58:Start-class 4703:Categories 4654:Geysirhead 4604:Geysirhead 4347:WP:NOTABLE 3546:Let's talk 3405:Let's talk 3069:References 3053:Be Welcome 2967:explains: 2751:References 2397:high level 2385:keep trust 2354:to sue me. 2113:User:Valmi 1636:Ok, I see 306:User:Felix 287:Categories 3417:this edit 2928:whois.net 2920:whois.net 2643:Activity? 1983:article: 1979:From the 1185:Unsourced 1151:checkers. 1004:Criticism 953:See also? 363:Dunemaire 190:Computing 4326:or that 3748:I never 3580:contribs 3568:unsigned 3452:that. - 3284:Quelle: 3142:fair use 3126:fair use 2963:. Also 2290:contribs 2278:unsigned 2259:contribs 2247:unsigned 2172:--Valmi 2092:contribs 2080:unsigned 1662:HC logo? 1603:See also 1028:contribs 1015:unsigned 992:This one 959:See also 225:Websites 216:websites 185:Websites 137:Internet 128:Internet 87:Internet 28:deletion 4638:WP:PSCI 4578:Flexman 4537:Flexman 4510:Flexman 4495:Flexman 4461:WP:BLUE 4444:Flexman 4393:Flexman 4304:Flexman 4285:Flexman 4240:Flexman 4199:Flexman 4174:Flexman 4159:Flexman 4145:Flexman 4091:Flexman 4056:Flexman 4041:Flexman 4006:Flexman 3824:Flexman 3767:Flexman 3762:Flexman 3717:WP:NAAC 3620:Flexman 3510:Flexman 3473:Flexman 3454:Flexman 3421:Flexman 3385:WP:Bold 3371:Flexman 3351:Flexman 3297:Sitemap 3191:Splette 2941:Splette 2843:Splette 2714:Amarent 2697:Amarent 2681:"After 2607:Splette 2546:Amarent 2527:First, 2416:Splette 2319:Amarent 2064:--Valmi 2004:--Valmi 1798:WP:CITE 1756:Splette 1697:Splette 1669:Splette 1638:Splette 1608:Splette 1526:Splette 1206:AdSense 805:website 354:Members 4085:WP:ANI 3295:Under 2977:Addhoc 2902:Addhoc 2780:Addhoc 2563:origin 2440:signed 1810:False? 1426:meant. 1423:before 1306:No. -- 1202:Google 1038:Spitzl 803:As my 453:bboard 435:bboard 390:Revert 346:hhanke 311:Images 64:scale. 4437:WP:OR 4389:WP:OR 4340:WP:OR 4281:WP:OR 4258:as of 4236:WP:OR 4232:WP:OR 4076:WP:OR 4072:Unbhs 4067:WP:OR 4021:WP:OR 4002:WP:OR 3489:WP:OR 3435:WP:OR 3369:). - 3328:Arved 3183:graph 3043:Guaka 3037:HCvol 2997:Guaka 2965:WP:OR 2961:WP:RS 2898:Whois 2894:WP:RS 2870:WP:RS 2838:WHOIS 2834:Guaka 2817:Guaka 2803:WHOIS 2738:Guaka 2701:Guaka 2630:Guaka 2594:Guaka 2550:Guaka 2505:Valmi 2469:Valmi 2455:Guaka 2405:Guaka 2401:trust 2369:Guaka 2307:Guaka 2205:Guaka 2182:Guaka 2052:Guaka 1995:Guaka 1944:Guaka 1908:Guaka 1877:Guaka 1845:Guaka 1828:Guaka 1739:Valmi 1720:Valmi 1622:Valmi 1599:Valmi 1545:Valmi 1470:Valmi 1395:Valmi 1339:Guaka 1308:Valmi 1267:Valmi 1225:Guaka 1132:Valmi 1107:Valmi 1076:Guaka 1063:Valmi 1053:Guaka 996:Guaka 967:Guaka 965:now. 940:Guaka 906:Guaka 886:Guaka 862:Guaka 845:From 815:than 809:whole 770:Guaka 679:Guaka 675:guaka 491:Guaka 464:Guaka 411:Guaka 4686:talk 4672:talk 4668:Unbh 4658:talk 4648:per 4634:Unbh 4624:talk 4620:Unbh 4608:talk 4600:Read 4597:Unbh 4582:talk 4555:talk 4551:2ple 4541:talk 4523:★Ama 4499:talk 4481:★Ama 4466:★Ama 4448:talk 4426:talk 4397:talk 4357:★Ama 4289:talk 4283:? - 4270:talk 4244:talk 4203:talk 4185:★Ama 4163:talk 4149:talk 4135:talk 4131:Unbh 4103:★Ama 4060:Unbh 4058:and 4045:talk 4026:★Ama 4010:talk 3967:★Ama 3947:talk 3943:Unbh 3929:★Ama 3918:talk 3914:Unbh 3890:★Ama 3878:talk 3874:Unbh 3860:★Ama 3847:talk 3843:Unbh 3829:★Ama 3814:talk 3810:Unbh 3787:★Ama 3772:★Ama 3740:talk 3736:Unbh 3722:★Ama 3708:talk 3704:Unbh 3682:★Ama 3675:Unbh 3664:talk 3660:Unbh 3635:★Ama 3626:Unbh 3576:talk 3572:Unbh 3537:MrMe 3533:MrMe 3514:talk 3495:★Ama 3471:and 3469:Unbh 3458:talk 3443:talk 3439:Unbh 3425:talk 3396:MrMe 3392:MrMe 3375:talk 3367:here 3355:talk 3349:. - 3332:talk 3313:talk 3278:talk 3228:talk 3134:this 3055:? - 2932:link 2916:WP:V 2890:WP:V 2874:Lysy 2790:Lysy 2567:The 2444:away 2432:some 2315:NPOV 2311:Veit 2286:talk 2255:talk 2088:talk 1895:. - 1796:and 1785:and 1561:. - 1376:you. 1024:talk 920:Lysy 896:Lysy 875:Lysy 817:once 813:more 572:Lysy 526:Lysy 504:npov 478:Lysy 455:and 442:Lysy 36:keep 34:was 4652:.-- 4266:BDD 3535:And 3480:was 3394:And 3247:--> 2912:all 2808:In 2399:of 2029:or 2025:or 1597:Hi 1204:'s 1092:it? 244:??? 156:??? 4705:: 4688:) 4674:) 4660:) 4626:) 4610:) 4584:) 4557:) 4543:) 4517:is 4501:) 4450:) 4428:) 4399:) 4291:) 4272:) 4261:}} 4255:{{ 4246:) 4205:) 4165:) 4151:) 4137:) 4047:) 4012:) 3949:) 3920:) 3880:) 3853:– 3849:) 3816:) 3742:) 3710:) 3666:) 3582:) 3578:• 3516:) 3460:) 3445:) 3427:) 3377:) 3357:) 3334:) 3315:) 3280:) 3230:) 3193::) 3188:-- 3144:. 2663:- 2654:, 2650:, 2467:-- 2413:-- 2403:. 2391:." 2345:) 2288:• 2257:• 2165:. 2090:• 1737:-- 1667:-- 1559:nn 1543:-- 1468:-- 1393:-- 1265:-- 1130:-- 1036:-- 1026:• 918:-- 721:- 476:-- 440:-- 188:: 4684:( 4670:( 4656:( 4646:. 4632:@ 4622:( 4606:( 4595:@ 4580:( 4553:( 4539:( 4512:: 4508:@ 4497:( 4446:( 4424:( 4395:( 4349:. 4306:: 4302:@ 4287:( 4268:( 4242:( 4201:( 4176:: 4172:@ 4161:( 4147:( 4133:( 4093:: 4089:@ 4062:: 4054:@ 4043:( 4008:( 3945:( 3916:( 3876:( 3845:( 3812:( 3738:( 3706:( 3677:: 3673:@ 3662:( 3622:: 3618:@ 3574:( 3512:( 3475:: 3467:@ 3456:( 3441:( 3437:. 3423:( 3373:( 3353:( 3330:( 3311:( 3276:( 3226:( 3206:· 3060:· 2668:· 2508:✒ 2472:✒ 2284:( 2253:( 2086:( 1742:✒ 1723:✒ 1625:✒ 1548:✒ 1473:✒ 1398:✒ 1311:✒ 1270:✒ 1135:✒ 1110:✒ 1066:✒ 1022:( 1011:— 459:. 272:. 252:. 222:. 164:. 70:: 38:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index