533:
the majority of the consensus were indeed muslim, I have seen many other articles going on to elaborate much on the perpetrator's origins, but why not only on this one? whats the bias here? why dont you just stick to being neutral as a place providing objective knowledge and not letting your own arbitrary decisions shadowing over factual information being portrayed. And do not block and send me private messages if you want to "talk" talk here out in the open and see what the out come is.. Plus why dont you just stop contradicting yourself by rambling on about how most Asians are not muslim when your people (meaning the editors) were trying to protect this assertion of the perpetrators being "British Asian" WTF? get your damn act together please.. so according your previous comrade the perpetrators were
British Asians who were in fact muslims, Jesus man, now you guys started contradicting each other.. but i do agree with you regarding this one, most Asians are not muslims so why call them British Asians, call them god damn muslims for crying out loud
679:
in their names and you dont need birth certificates to corroborate whether the rest of the named were muslim as well, use your inner gut, this is something that should come to you empirically that they were muslim, come on dudes lets be realistic here, you know and i know and so does everelse know thag they were muslims, why dont you just amend it to what it truly is.. its not only me asking you to do this, you had this request from many others as well, you blocked them all.. now this little girl lost everything, basically her whole life ahead of her, stop defending these perpetrators and do the girl some justice
335:
314:
345:
217:
196:
164:
50:
227:
778:
some indicator on the signal sentense, that these men had some sort of a commonality, cause trust me man, this request is gonna keep on coming to you, from each and every new reader who gets to this article, if you dont neutralize it, and keep it on this volatile state. And also do remember the little girl is also still alive and living, so at least show her some respect aye
21:
108:
81:
807:
I found a credible source and added the the ethnicity of the perpetrators to the lead, as this is information that other articles on similar topics devote a great deal of attention to and national media coverage at the time did too. Feel free (of course) to come with constructive criticism and change
559:
And dude your imperturbable response sent to my "talk" after blocking me when I was asking you a question that was quite a bit sensitive and a bit sentimental to, say, the victim and her family in this case, is truth be told utterly deplorable and detestable and now I have no qualm in suspecting your
442:
There's recently been an edit war around whether the perpetrators in this case should be called "British Asian" or "British
Pakistani" in the lead of the article. There's now an extended-confirmed protection in place for a few weeks to halt this, but I've a feeling the issue won't go away, so we need
678:
Well anyway im not here blame anyone here, just want the information to be represented in the most accurate manner. First of all if your were stuck in irresolute and your scruples were not being exactly sure whether these men were infact muslims; if you see the majority of convicts contain 'muhamed'
532:
Well yeah why dont you guys have your cup of tea and talk about how your perfect little world is after blocking every single person that oppose you.. why cant you have a discourse without having the need to block people off. Anyway, tell me the harm in mentioning the actuality of the situation where
473:
The issue is clouded by there being a perception in the UK that this type of crime generally involves perpetrators from ethnic minorities and white victims, and that there's consequently a racial motive. However the sources quoted in this article don't actually say this is the case, they just report
446:
The sources in the article mainly don't allude to the background of the criminals at all, just referring to them as "men", though one does use the term "Asian" to describe them. If sources don't refer to them as having
Pakistani origins, describing them as such in the article is just speculation, or
499:
I think at this point it is best to avoid having any descriptor in the lead. I understand that it may seem reasonable from your perspective, however it can be seen as prejudiced. In addition nowhere in the article does it state that the perpetrators are muslim, simply being asian and having asian
777:
right, well i do have to say, i do agree with you for letting the readers come to their own conclusion without a verified source corrobarating that they were indeed muslim and everything else you say. I think i agreed with you on this one since yesterday, but what im suggesting is to at least put
560:
moral ground regarding this matter for defending these filthy pigs.. answer me this little man.. if it was truly your daughter, wouldnt you want this case to be given proper coverage and given adamant justice? please answer this question with proper reverence and without your nonchalant disdain
606:
nobody was inquirying about your religious faith, and i simply dont care what you believe in and what you dont, why are you running away from any confrontations and digressing from the conversation? Please answer my questions if you have nothing to fear and you dont condone these pigs actions..
515:
Well, indeed. Most Asians are not Muslim, after all (China and India, the two largest nations by population in Asia, have non-Muslim majorities, and so on). Reliable sources do comment on cases where terrorists -- as opposed to child sex abusers -- have been regular attendees at mosque or at a
173:
91:
154:
31:
964:
119:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
120:
423:
Legal charges laid out against accused can be sourced and ennumerated, as can outcomes outcommes of those charges. Withe highly publicized crimes, we do not conceal the charges.
652:
dude you look like you make a little bit more sense here, can you please read my comment below, and consider the request one more time, just make a rightious decision here.
607:
remember all your answers will be seeing here by anyone, so dont answer absent-minded, like you did on my talk, thank god i took a sceen shot of your outrageous response
115:
86:
954:
916:
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
178:
989:
401:
391:
944:
144:
949:
994:
984:
959:
834:
939:
859:
974:
296:
286:
367:
838:
979:
969:
709:. As you say many names do give a particular appearance, though without a citation we must allow readers to make their own conclusion, as this
793:
694:
667:
622:
575:
548:
358:
319:
261:
865:
477:
My personal view is that the ethnicity of criminals doesn't belong in the lead at all unless the crime is unambiguously related to it.
705:
While it may appear that many of the individuals listed are muslim, that is not how wikipedia works. All content we post must be
255:
245:
201:
897:
459:
842:
827:
467:
239:
61:
586:
Pigs are considered unclean in my religion, so the only pigs I defend on this encyclopedia are those helped out by
455:
849:
article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
27:
753:
Furthermore we have to be especially careful as this does refer to living persons, we must be sure to adhere to
727:
Furthermore we have to be especially careful as this does refer to living persons, we must be sure to adhere to
845:'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for
789:
690:
663:
618:
571:
544:
463:
49:
706:
785:
686:
659:
614:
567:
540:
428:
350:
67:
781:
761:
735:
718:
682:
655:
642:
610:
563:
536:
505:
259:, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's
20:
920:
813:
634:
485:
366:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
516:
particular mosque, but reliable sources for such in these different cases, seems to be absent.
873:
595:
587:
521:
424:
334:
313:
232:
925:
891:
817:
797:
765:
757:
739:
731:
722:
714:
710:
698:
671:
646:
638:
626:
599:
579:
552:
525:
509:
501:
489:
432:
637:
of this discussion appears to point towards leaving it out, and it will remain as such.
917:
809:
804:
481:
462:
for example) don't mention the background of those involved in the lead, while others (
363:
933:
754:
728:
591:
517:
448:
837:
to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
163:
340:
222:
876:
866:"Most child sexual abuse gangs made up of white men, Home Office report says"
898:"Lord Janner will not be forced to attend court to face child abuse charges"
250:
226:
216:
195:
474:
the jailing of a group of criminals who sexually abused underage girls.
253:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
107:
80:
43:
15:
249:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
162:
470:) do give this a mention, so there's no real consistency.
841:
in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
362:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
713:
violates wikipedia's rules against original research.
500:animus does not mean they are practicing muslims.
808:it, but please don't just revert the whole thing.
129:Knowledge:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
965:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
132:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
8:
835:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting
860:Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal
803:In case anyone is still watching this, per
47:
779:
680:
653:
608:
561:
534:
308:
190:
75:
454:Some other articles about similar cases (
116:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
955:Low-importance Organized crime articles
310:
192:
77:
990:Low-importance United Kingdom articles
945:Low-importance Crime-related articles
7:
950:Start-Class Organized crime articles
864:Grierson, Jamie (15 December 2020).
376:Knowledge:WikiProject United Kingdom
356:This article is within the scope of
113:This article is within the scope of
995:WikiProject United Kingdom articles
985:Start-Class United Kingdom articles
960:Organized crime task force articles
379:Template:WikiProject United Kingdom
66:It is of interest to the following
940:Start-Class Crime-related articles
896:Grierson, Jamie (28 August 2015).
30:on 4 February 2018. The result of
14:
975:Low-importance Yorkshire articles
633:In any case it appears that the
343:
333:
312:
225:
215:
194:
106:
79:
48:
19:
396:This article has been rated as
291:This article has been rated as
271:Knowledge:WikiProject Yorkshire
149:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
980:WikiProject Yorkshire articles
970:Start-Class Yorkshire articles
798:23:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
766:23:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
740:23:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
723:23:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
699:23:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
672:23:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
647:23:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
627:22:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
600:22:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
580:22:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
553:20:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
526:21:26, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
510:21:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
274:Template:WikiProject Yorkshire
174:the Organized crime task force
1:
926:23:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
590:. But thank you for the tea.
460:Keighley child sex abuse ring
443:to try to reach a consensus.
370:and see a list of open tasks.
171:This article is supported by
123:and see a list of open tasks.
843:Halifax child sex abuse ring
828:Halifax child sex abuse ring
818:23:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
468:Bristol child sex abuse ring
433:00:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
240:Halifax child sex abuse ring
126:Crime and Criminal Biography
87:Crime and Criminal Biography
853:Reference named "Grierson":
1011:
490:13:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
456:Derby child sex abuse ring
402:project's importance scale
359:WikiProject United Kingdom
297:project's importance scale
155:project's importance scale
395:
328:
290:
210:
170:
148:
101:
74:
833:I check pages listed in
464:Newcastle sex abuse ring
826:Orphaned references in
495:Description in the lead
382:United Kingdom articles
243:is within the scope of
438:Origin of perpetrators
167:
135:Crime-related articles
56:This article is rated
351:United Kingdom portal
246:WikiProject Yorkshire
166:
839:orphaned references
277:Yorkshire articles
168:
62:content assessment
800:
784:comment added by
701:
685:comment added by
674:
658:comment added by
629:
613:comment added by
582:
566:comment added by
555:
539:comment added by
416:
415:
412:
411:
408:
407:
307:
306:
303:
302:
189:
188:
185:
184:
42:
41:
1002:
923:
912:
910:
908:
887:
885:
883:
384:
383:
380:
377:
374:
353:
348:
347:
346:
337:
330:
329:
324:
316:
309:
279:
278:
275:
272:
269:
235:
233:Yorkshire portal
230:
229:
219:
212:
211:
206:
198:
191:
137:
136:
133:
130:
127:
110:
103:
102:
97:
94:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1001:
1000:
999:
930:
929:
921:
906:
904:
895:
892:Greville Janner
881:
879:
863:
831:
497:
440:
421:
381:
378:
375:
372:
371:
349:
344:
342:
322:
276:
273:
270:
267:
266:
231:
224:
204:
134:
131:
128:
125:
124:
95:
92:Organized crime
89:
60:on Knowledge's
57:
12:
11:
5:
1008:
1006:
998:
997:
992:
987:
982:
977:
972:
967:
962:
957:
952:
947:
942:
932:
931:
914:
913:
888:
830:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
786:Lightershade93
771:
770:
769:
768:
745:
744:
743:
742:
687:Lightershade93
676:
675:
660:Lightershade93
631:
630:
615:Lightershade93
603:
602:
588:this nice lady
568:Lightershade93
557:
556:
541:Lightershade93
529:
528:
496:
493:
439:
436:
420:
417:
414:
413:
410:
409:
406:
405:
398:Low-importance
394:
388:
387:
385:
373:United Kingdom
368:the discussion
364:United Kingdom
355:
354:
338:
326:
325:
323:Low‑importance
320:United Kingdom
317:
305:
304:
301:
300:
293:Low-importance
289:
283:
282:
280:
237:
236:
220:
208:
207:
205:Low‑importance
199:
187:
186:
183:
182:
179:Low-importance
169:
159:
158:
151:Low-importance
147:
141:
140:
138:
121:the discussion
111:
99:
98:
96:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1007:
996:
993:
991:
988:
986:
983:
981:
978:
976:
973:
971:
968:
966:
963:
961:
958:
956:
953:
951:
948:
946:
943:
941:
938:
937:
935:
928:
927:
924:
919:
903:
899:
893:
889:
878:
875:
871:
867:
861:
857:
856:
855:
854:
850:
848:
844:
840:
836:
829:
825:
819:
815:
811:
806:
802:
801:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
776:
775:
774:
767:
763:
759:
756:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
741:
737:
733:
730:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
703:
702:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
651:
650:
649:
648:
644:
640:
636:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
605:
604:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
531:
530:
527:
523:
519:
514:
513:
512:
511:
507:
503:
494:
492:
491:
487:
483:
478:
475:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
452:
450:
444:
437:
435:
434:
430:
426:
419:Legal charges
418:
403:
399:
393:
390:
389:
386:
369:
365:
361:
360:
352:
341:
339:
336:
332:
331:
327:
321:
318:
315:
311:
298:
294:
288:
285:
284:
281:
264:
263:
258:
257:
252:
248:
247:
242:
241:
234:
228:
223:
221:
218:
214:
213:
209:
203:
200:
197:
193:
180:
177:(assessed as
176:
175:
165:
161:
160:
156:
152:
146:
143:
142:
139:
122:
118:
117:
112:
109:
105:
104:
100:
93:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
915:
905:. Retrieved
902:The Guardian
901:
880:. Retrieved
870:The Guardian
869:
852:
851:
846:
832:
780:— Preceding
772:
746:
681:— Preceding
677:
654:— Preceding
632:
609:— Preceding
562:— Preceding
558:
535:— Preceding
498:
479:
476:
472:
453:
445:
441:
422:
397:
357:
292:
260:
256:project page
254:
244:
238:
172:
150:
114:
68:WikiProjects
35:
882:16 December
480:Comments??
425:E.M.Gregory
58:Start-class
934:Categories
758:Dmartin969
732:Dmartin969
715:Dmartin969
707:verifiable
639:Dmartin969
502:Dmartin969
918:AnomieBOT
907:29 August
877:0261-3077
810:Hentheden
711:Synthesis
635:consensus
482:Neiltonks
268:Yorkshire
262:talk page
251:Yorkshire
202:Yorkshire
794:contribs
782:unsigned
695:contribs
683:unsigned
668:contribs
656:unsigned
623:contribs
611:unsigned
576:contribs
564:unsigned
549:contribs
537:unsigned
447:at best
28:deletion
805:WP:BOLD
592:MPS1992
518:MPS1992
400:on the
295:on the
153:on the
755:WP:BLP
729:WP:BLP
64:scale.
890:From
858:From
449:WP:OR
909:2015
884:2020
874:ISSN
847:this
814:talk
790:talk
762:talk
736:talk
719:talk
691:talk
664:talk
643:talk
619:talk
596:talk
572:talk
545:talk
522:talk
506:talk
486:talk
429:talk
36:keep
34:was
773:−
747:+
451:.
392:Low
287:Low
145:Low
936::
900:.
894::
872:.
868:.
862::
816:)
796:)
792:•
764:)
738:)
721:)
697:)
693:•
670:)
666:•
645:)
625:)
621:•
598:)
578:)
574:•
551:)
547:•
524:)
508:)
488:)
466:,
458:,
431:)
181:).
90::
922:⚡
911:.
886:.
812:(
788:(
760:(
734:(
717:(
689:(
662:(
641:(
617:(
594:(
570:(
543:(
520:(
504:(
484:(
427:(
404:.
299:.
265:.
157:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
