87:. The prose and organization is in good shape, although it would be good if editors could try and weave the history section into better subsections -- the use of the different level (2nd & 3rd level subsection headers) can be somewhat confusing at times. But overall, the article is informative and meets the
123:
66:
62:
83:
The article is reasonably well-written, contains adequate reference citations from multiple sources, and mostly conforms to the
47:
39:
115:
96:
107:
92:
88:
84:
55:
17:
32:
131:
100:
74:
43:
8:
7:
24:
106:Thank you! Much appreciated! ♥
1:
132:16:59, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
101:16:15, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
148:
139:
128:
120:
112:
79:
70:
51:
147:
146:
142:
141:
140:
138:
137:
136:
124:
116:
108:
85:manual of style
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
18:Talk:Hardy Boyz
12:
11:
5:
145:
143:
135:
134:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
144:
133:
129:
127:
121:
119:
113:
111:
105:
104:
103:
102:
98:
94:
91:. Good work!
90:
86:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
125:
117:
109:
82:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
89:GA criteria
44:visual edit
27:GA Review
93:Dr. Cash
118:Vampire
67:history
48:history
34:Article
126:Heart
76:Watch
16:<
110:Nici
97:talk
63:edit
40:edit
130:♥
99:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
122:♥
114:♥
95:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.