Knowledge

Talk:Harikrishnans

Source 📝

315: 557:. And frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if the same two people haven't been fighting about this stuff for years. Oh, and to be honest, while I did pissily say that going by the Hari Krishnan ordering was ridiculous, I started to think that maybe it wasn't so dumb after all, especially in a world where we have no clear way to gauge "correct" billing order. Since we're kind of saddled with making an arbitrary decision, maybe that should be the way to go. So I'm walking that back... 147: 22: 77: 53: 339: 213: 175: 199: 87: 223: 291: 500:
comes before Mo...; the other one is even more tenuous, namely that in the compound "Harikrishnans", "Hari" comes before "Krishnan" – but as I say, that's so tenuous as to be silly. Still, there doesn't seem to be any reason not to mention Mammootty first. The legality arguments have no bearing on how to cite the cast list. --
381:
that a second print exists with Mohanlal credited first. However, the sources seem to say that only the last part of the film was changed, so unless it can be proven that a different intro exists with different credits, it would seem that the Mammootty priority should remain until a new method for
499:
It makes every kind of sense to use the confirmed cast order – it really is a non-issue, but there is nothing else to differ between the two actors from what I can see. There are a couple of other possible ways to reason around the listing order: one is to keep it alphabetical, in which case Ma...
453:
Legality has no bearing on the intended presentation of the film, which I've already said. Copyright violation has no bearing either. If I happened to watch the bootlegged version of the film that credited Mohanlal first, you'd be saying "Cyphoidbomb's right, Mohanlal should be credited first!"
369:
As per usual across the many articles about films with both Mohanlal and Mammootty in them, we appear to be yet again embroiled in an idiotic back-and-forth over who should be credited first. Because this is a really important issue in our world. I have personally seen the intro to a print that
552:
At some point this might need a wider RFC, because this crap comes up every time with these clowns' films. And I'm pretty sure I remember from the past other instances when different posters, or film prints, were released with different billing to satisfy the zealots. Might've been related to
438:
is a government constituted body. Releasing uncensored portions of a film is punishable with 3-year imprisonment or fine or both as per The Cinematograph Act, 1952, hence it is illegal. Only the Disney+ Hotstar has the right to stream the film, if it is available anywhere else, it's obviously
571:
I have provided the official source for the film, the true final print, whereas you haven't provided any. What are you saying, we have to take your word for granted? That IP has not provided any source for his claim. I am the only one who have obeyed
419:
None of the films is "illegitimate". One was not approved for release by the censorship board. Big difference. We know for a fact that it was the filmmakers' calculated intention to release more than one version to pander to fans of either actor.
370:
listed Mammootty first. Unfortunately, I cannot link to it, as it is almost certainly a copyright violation. Onscreen credits are almost always sufficient for determining official cast billing, where Disney Hotstar is not, I say in reference to
472:
To this argument, The Hotstar version shows as 'For Pranavams International, Mohanlal Presents, Mammootty in, Fazil's, Harikrishnans'. It doesn't introduce Mohanlal as the actor, but the producer. So it credits Mohanlal first, doesn't stand.
576:
here, still you have reverted that over the unsubstantiated version. Great. I have cleared my part, now its his turn to provide evidence for his claim. Do you think he is ever going to come here for discussion with this version on? Never.
667: 405:
The print in the film's official streaming service Disney+ Hotstar credits Mohanlal first. It could probably be the final version of the film as the other uncensored version is illegitimate.
652: 637: 377:
That said, we know that there are two prints of this film, one that is supposed to appeal to Mohanlal fans, and another that is supposed to appeal to Mammootty fans. So it is
324: 189: 156: 63: 662: 329: 672: 612: 617: 647: 305: 632: 281: 271: 657: 642: 578: 440: 406: 677: 627: 435: 622: 607: 105: 530: 507: 117: 109: 300: 185: 33: 382:
determining "correct" (or more accurately "preferable to one fandom, unpreferable to the other") order is established.
246: 236: 180: 113: 100: 58: 582: 444: 410: 21: 520: 562: 459: 425: 395: 39: 314: 533: 510: 573: 558: 554: 494: 455: 421: 391: 146: 601: 547: 525: 502: 476: 385: 228: 104:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 475:
Also I must say this is an intended use of words and same with both versions. -
92: 218: 82: 76: 52: 519:
Ha, I just realise that you countered the "Hari before Krishnan" argument at
338: 212: 174: 290: 121: 586: 566: 537: 514: 485: 463: 448: 429: 414: 399: 198: 244:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 241: 15: 337: 313: 289: 145: 371: 668:
Start-Class Indian cinema articles of Low-importance
523:– good thing I did say it was silly! Sincerely, 240:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 120:. To improve this article, please refer to the 653:Start-Class Kerala articles of Low-importance 8: 638:Start-Class India articles of Low-importance 19: 169: 116:. To use this banner, please refer to the 47: 171: 49: 663:Low-importance Indian cinema articles 7: 234:This article is within the scope of 98:This article is within the scope of 436:Central Board of Film Certification 434:It is illegitimate as per law. The 38:It is of interest to the following 673:WikiProject Indian cinema articles 613:Start-Class Indian cinema articles 346:This article was last assessed in 14: 618:Indian cinema task force articles 154:This article is supported by the 221: 211: 197: 173: 114:regional and topical task forces 85: 75: 51: 20: 276:This article has been rated as 648:Low-importance Kerala articles 541:(not a fanboy of either actor) 1: 633:Low-importance India articles 365:Who should be credited first? 322:This article is supported by 298:This article is supported by 658:WikiProject Kerala articles 643:Start-Class Kerala articles 486:07:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC) 325:the Indian cinema workgroup 256:Knowledge:WikiProject India 694: 678:WikiProject India articles 628:Start-Class India articles 282:project's importance scale 259:Template:WikiProject India 130:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 623:WikiProject Film articles 608:Start-Class film articles 587:07:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 567:18:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 538:18:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 515:17:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 464:18:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 449:10:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 430:20:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 415:18:08, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 400:17:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 345: 321: 297: 275: 206: 153: 133:Template:WikiProject Film 70: 46: 390:what are your thoughts? 157:Indian cinema task force 521:User talk:103.99.219.54 342: 318: 294: 150: 28:This article is rated 439:copyright violation. 341: 317: 293: 149: 374:ill-informed edit. 106:join the discussion 343: 319: 301:WikiProject Kerala 295: 151: 34:content assessment 542: 536: 513: 362: 361: 358: 357: 354: 353: 237:WikiProject India 168: 167: 164: 163: 108:and see lists of 685: 555:Twenty:20 (film) 551: 540: 529: 506: 498: 483: 389: 264: 263: 260: 257: 254: 231: 226: 225: 224: 215: 208: 207: 202: 201: 200: 195: 192: 177: 170: 138: 137: 134: 131: 128: 101:WikiProject Film 95: 90: 89: 88: 79: 72: 71: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 693: 692: 688: 687: 686: 684: 683: 682: 598: 597: 545: 492: 477: 383: 367: 261: 258: 255: 252: 251: 227: 222: 220: 196: 193: 183: 135: 132: 129: 126: 125: 91: 86: 84: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 691: 689: 681: 680: 675: 670: 665: 660: 655: 650: 645: 640: 635: 630: 625: 620: 615: 610: 600: 599: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 579:137.97.147.191 490: 489: 488: 474: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 441:137.97.189.205 407:137.97.117.212 366: 363: 360: 359: 356: 355: 352: 351: 344: 334: 333: 330:Low-importance 320: 310: 309: 306:Low-importance 296: 286: 285: 278:Low-importance 274: 268: 267: 265: 262:India articles 233: 232: 216: 204: 203: 194:Low‑importance 178: 166: 165: 162: 161: 152: 142: 141: 139: 97: 96: 80: 68: 67: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 690: 679: 676: 674: 671: 669: 666: 664: 661: 659: 656: 654: 651: 649: 646: 644: 641: 639: 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 619: 616: 614: 611: 609: 606: 605: 603: 588: 584: 580: 575: 570: 569: 568: 564: 560: 556: 549: 544: 543: 539: 535: 532: 531:contributions 528: 527: 522: 518: 517: 516: 512: 509: 508:contributions 505: 504: 496: 491: 487: 484: 482: 481: 471: 465: 461: 457: 452: 451: 450: 446: 442: 437: 433: 432: 431: 427: 423: 418: 417: 416: 412: 408: 404: 403: 402: 401: 397: 393: 387: 380: 375: 373: 364: 349: 340: 336: 335: 331: 328:(assessed as 327: 326: 316: 312: 311: 307: 304:(assessed as 303: 302: 292: 288: 287: 283: 279: 273: 270: 269: 266: 249: 248: 243: 239: 238: 230: 219: 217: 214: 210: 209: 205: 191: 187: 182: 179: 176: 172: 159: 158: 148: 144: 143: 140: 136:film articles 123: 119: 118:documentation 115: 111: 107: 103: 102: 94: 83: 81: 78: 74: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 524: 501: 479: 478: 378: 376: 368: 347: 323: 299: 277: 247:project page 245: 235: 229:India portal 155: 99: 40:WikiProjects 559:Cyphoidbomb 495:Cyphoidbomb 456:Cyphoidbomb 422:Cyphoidbomb 392:Cyphoidbomb 93:Film portal 30:Start-class 602:Categories 348:April 2012 122:guidelines 110:open tasks 574:WP:BURDEN 379:possible 548:Bonadea 526:bonadea 503:bonadea 480:The9Man 386:Bonadea 280:on the 190:Cinema 186:Kerala 64:Indian 36:scale. 253:India 242:India 181:India 583:talk 563:talk 534:talk 511:talk 460:talk 445:talk 426:talk 411:talk 396:talk 372:this 127:Film 112:and 59:Film 272:Low 604:: 585:) 565:) 462:) 447:) 428:) 413:) 398:) 332:). 308:). 188:/ 184:: 62:: 581:( 561:( 550:: 546:@ 497:: 493:@ 458:( 443:( 424:( 409:( 394:( 388:: 384:@ 350:. 284:. 250:. 160:. 124:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Film
Indian
WikiProject icon
Film portal
WikiProject Film
join the discussion
open tasks
regional and topical task forces
documentation
guidelines
Taskforce icon
Indian cinema task force
WikiProject icon
India
Kerala
Cinema
WikiProject icon
India portal
WikiProject India
India
project page
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Kerala
Low-importance

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.