876:
to risk a drive there and back repeatedly and spend time on all these tasks at an undiscovered murder scene while for all he knew, anyone including family, could turn up. Delmer knew the farms routine and likelihood of visitors. He had the next farm and could actually see the Crewe's farmhouse from some of his own buildings. Moreover, people had been contacting Demler starting from the evening of the 17th asking why the Crewes were not answering their phone.. And this supposed five days of sustained inaction was from a man who knew his daughter was terrified because of a long and mysterious campaign of arson and burglary against her farm! Realistically, and as books published while he was alive have it, multiple lines of evidence point to the late Mr Demler having been at the Crewe’s farm between the 17th and 22nd. On those grounds alone circumstantial evidence for him having murdered his daughter and her husband on the 17th is quite strong, as mainstream published books have openly stated.
927:
There was much more compelling evidence against Thomas, even though
Exhibit 350 was a fabrication and he was only tenuously tied to the axle and the wire used to tie up the victims. The axle and wire are barely mentioned in the article because the links to Thomas are so tenuous. The rifle, recovered bullets, and cartridge case were important aspects of the Crown case against Thomas at both trials and need to be mentioned, even though both trials resulted in miscarriages of justice. You seem concerned that the cartridge case, Exhibit 350, shouldn't be mentioned because it turned out to be non-evidence. How then, do we show that the Crown case against Thomas collapsed? It's essential to show that the cartridge case was entirely discredited because it had been planted. We can't do any more than that, and it's difficult to see how we're being unfair to Thomas when the article says over and over again that it was a miscarriage of justice, planted evidence, exonerated, etc.
951:
reason, knew visitors were unlikely, and had ready access. Proquitity points to Demler again, and he had a excellent motive to make sure
Jannettes 18 month old survived, because she was his granddaughter. There was a non trivial amount of evidence to suggest that Demler did the murders. A really quite large smear of Jeannette's blood was found on the middle of the back rest of the passenger seat of Demler's car, and he had a scratch on his neck (Jeannette's corpse had a broken cheekbone and avulsed teeth). The 2014 police review emphasised the axle, so a detective superintendent with access to all the case files disagrees with you, but the axle (not the only one pulled out of that stretch of river) was not independent of the discredited Detective Inspector Hutton. There was only Hutton's word that wire was connecting the axle to the body underwater. Finally, Demler held a birthday party for himself at a local hotel on 6 July, before the bodies were found.
1283:" A car axle linked to Arthur Allan Thomas had apparently been used to weigh down Harvey's body and was central to police theories about the case. The axle was a significant item in evidence implicating Thomas that led to charges being laid against him." This is incorrect, the axle implicated him certainly but it was most certainly not sufficient to have charged him, as the findings Royal Commission on the case made perfectly clear. The falsified evidence of the spent cartridge case at the scene of the crime led to Thomas being tried, and the finding was that when the faked cartridge case was subtracted from the prosecution case, what remained constituted insufficient evidence to prosecute Thomas for the murders. Arthur Allan Thomas is a living person so its contrary to BLP too.
841:
investigating Thomas is a good question (it seems the head of the investigation simply became frustrated because Demler wouldn't break). Thomas has his own article and his wrongful conviction and complicated ballistics matters, which contrary to your preferred version has more questions than answers by the way, can be gone into detail there. The Crewes are dead but when you mention Thomas this becomes a BLP and you have to understand that such an extremely serious matter as implying and actually stating there was evidence that still stands up against him for two murders for which he remains the only suspect in the police's view is something that is, on my understanding of BLP, quite impermissible.
1028:
had been proven to have been fired by any gun that was tested. The spent cartridge case was from Thomas's gun but it was too clean to have been lying in the garden (cops in 2014 review). Those are the points that need to be made. The weight on extremely serious MATTERs and a living person repeat living person was inappropriate in places. I was never happy with this business about expert disagreeing as to whether whether she was "fed". The important point that the infant was cared for at some point needs to be made. She was not fed (the police made much of this in the 2014 review). But that is not the point, the doctors caring for her were in agreement that she was certainly given fluids.
756:
killed them you old bugger, what have you done with them?". It is far from clear to me why Demler is not mentioned in the lede given that the major books on the case by Yallop ect says suggest him. The article also fails in not mentioning Demler's propinquity to the 2 year campaign of burglary and arson, the murders and the killer spending days hanging about the farmhouse cleaning up and nearly setting the chimney on fire burning stuff, It should be mentioned. Demler was getting calls from the evening of the 17th asking why the Crewes were not answering their phone and yet he did not go there to see until the 22nd. He lived on the farm next door for goodness sake!
856:
over whether the baby had been fed at any time between the 17th and the 22nd, it was merely that a small minority of experts thought a 18month old could, in theory, have survived 5 days without fluids without suffering extreme or fatal dehydration. However, the balance of expert opinion was the condition of the Crewe's 8 month old daughter suggested she had been fed at some point, though probably not for a couple of days before the 22nd. And even this is a largely academic point because abundant testimony shows that the killer was there on subsequent days, and the 18 month old was even seen wandering around outside.
942:
because he lived on and ran a farm that was actually owned by his independently wealthy first wife. He expected to get it outright, then she changed her will and died. Her estate was in the process of being wound up when the murders occurred. Jeannette had been to get an accounting at the solicitors only a few days before she was killed, and she would have come into a half share of Demler’s farm ( with her husband no doubt sticking his nose in) had she lived. Despite Delmer being able to see the Crewes' farmhouse from his neighboring farm, he said he had not gone to the Crewes’ until the 22 June,
453:
435:
894:
opposite, the Royal
Commission explicitly stated that the spent cartridge case recovered from the garden indicated that certain detectives had deliberately planted it there. It seems to follow ineluctably that someone in the police faked evidence against Thomas by firing Thomas's ammunition in Thomas's rifle to get a spent cartridge case, (they are known to have carried out “test firings” at the farm) and then pretending the resultant ejected spent cartridge had been there since the murders.
783:
the police (referenced) and no reasonable person would draw the conclusion that the article is advocating that he is guilty. The "Campaigns" section gives a lot of weight to the fact that Thomas was unjustly convicted, and refers to "misconduct" and "unspeakable outrage". It's difficult to see how Thomas' situation could be better presented. You appear to be embarking on a crusade to remove any suggestion of his involvement; take care that you do not fall foul of
367:
173:
346:
152:
183:
82:
64:
866:
unknown risk of being seen return to the scene of the crime, would require easy unseen access/ egress on subsequent days and know enough about the farms routine to be fairly sure that no visitors would be there or arrive there while he was around. Oh, and the killer also would likely have some motive to care what happened to the Crewe's daughter (ie Demler's granddaughter).
33:
719:
Crewes were not answering their phone since the evening of the 17th and he did not go there till the 22nd , he lived next door and was in a land dispute, the mysterious fires and burglary, and more than one person said he told them he owned a gun that could fire 22is are all fine. What is not fine is the tone and prominence of stuff about Thomas, who is a living person.
282:
261:
751:
person as person as "twice" convicted and then pardoned in the lede. The person being mentioned in the lede is living, and the prominence and tone is massively inappropriate. Just saying someone was pardoned does not get you out of the weight that was attached to the information that he was convicted. I note that seeing as the article ended with
92:
1027:
The article was repetitively incomprehensible about the gun, and misleading about what Stott proved, and the sourced content is has too many irrelevant repetitive details from primary sources. I made it comprehensible, and consolidated it . There was never any suggestion that the bullet from a victim
875:
On various days after the 17th but before the 22n, passersby’ saw sparks were coming out the Crewe's farmhouse chimney, the Crewe's car had been moved to the garage, and the Crewe's 18 month daughter was outside. The stock and dogs were fed. It is very far from probable that this was a killer who had
840:
Demler is dead, and there is no BLP reason to omit the fact that from the begining many people, including the detective in charge of the case, thought he was the killer, and demanded he confess. Nothing that has come to light since casts doubt on that perception. Why the police squad was told to stop
950:
man could have known. A pile of dirty nappies, the survival of the 18 month old, unsoured milk, activity at the farmhouse, and someone actually seen indicated that someone/ the killer had been there 18-20 June, and pulling a lot of exposure to save the baby of a couple they killed, unless they had
718:
I think the lede and article is inappropriate tone and detail for BLP about Arthur Allan Thomas.The article is missing many facts about Demler and if you want to have them in the main section that is fine, but they are going in. Len Demler is dead so the fact he had been getting calls asking why the
999:
long time to say that
Jeannette had went to Wangunul to get away from you know, that by then could have been tailoring the accusation to back the prosecution theory over motive is circumstantial. The victim's blood on Demler's car seat back rest, and the scratch on Demler's neck is hard evidence by
755:
which you were fine with, your handling of BLP is highly problematic. Certain facts are being given far too much weight, the prominence and tone is casting suspicion on a living person. Why is Demler not mentioned in lede he was the mains suspect and the chief investigator told Demler "I know you
1206:
The singular may have been chosen for some articles on the basis that the murders were committed near-simultaneously or within a very short time, unlike a series of murders with a long gap between. I think that's not sufficient justification for the singular, and it would be interesting to see the
926:
Demler was, and still is, mentioned as a suspect, but there was never any evidence against him. He was not the registered owner of a rifle and there was never any evidence to show that he had access to one. He fell under suspicion only because he stood to gain the farm by the deaths of the Crewes.
903:
The bit about the cartridge case in the article will imply to the unwary reader that it implicates Thomas in the murders, but the Royal
Commission's findings were just the opposite; that it didn't and ballistic details indicated that Thomas's rifle and ammunition were not used in the murder. Given
885:
So, I think the article about the Crewes should mention the late Mr Demler much more prominently than the living and exonerated Thomas but the opposite has been the case. It is against BLP rules and inappropriate weight to prominently detail the conviction for double murder of a living person long
782:
to state that Thomas was twice convicted and then pardoned. Those are facts. Demler is mentioned as being the initial suspect, though he was never charged, so is not named in the lead. The paragraph stating that the 2014 police review still regards Thomas as the sole suspect is stating the view of
750:
BLP policy is that objectionable content can be removed without any prior discussion. No more reversions to BLP pleae, Coming here and talk and a experienced editor will decide if we cannot agree. Discuss and wait for outcome please. The article is about murder victims and then it names a living
588:
Have changed
Jeannette's name to her legal name (as used by herself, family, friends) prior to her death. Gadfium, thanks, I had changed the body of the text and was looking around for how to change the page title when you wrote that. I'll put in a footnote about the journalistic use which became
904:
that it is complex to explain even a fraction of this properly and BLP (wrongly) implying someone is implicated in murder is so clearly forbidden to editors, I think that expert testimony stuff about the spent cartridge case having been fired in Thomas’s rifle should just be taken out the article.
865:
It is difficult to avoid wondering if the idea is to muddy the waters around the feeding of the little girl in order to obscure the implication of why and how the killer would or could risk being there to see she was fed, because that would entail a killer who, uless he was willing to take a huge
855:
Some progress, with reverting, but still a lot needs changing. I don't understand why the article goes into the recondite matter of experts disagreeing about whether the baby could not have been fed for a couple of days before the 22nd. Furthermore, it is not true that there was real disagreement
941:
The propinquity of the late Mr Delmer to events was striking. Before the couple was murdered, a burglary and two arson attacks at the Crewes' had put
Jannette in fear for her life. Meanwhile on the adjoining property, the late Mr Demler was facing uncertainty about continuing to be his own boss,
889:
The Royal
Commission was quite clear that the manufacturer of the .22 ammunition used to kill the Crewes had records proving that none of the bullets recovered from the victims’ bodies and the spent cartridge police found in the garden case with ejector indentations showing it been ejected from
893:
Accordingly, the Royal
Commission said that although marks from the ejector on the spent cartridge were from a live round of ammunition being fired in the rifle belonging to Thomas, this fact constituted no kind of evidence of Thomas's rifle and ammunition being used in the murders. Quite the
787:. The article has stood the test of time for a considerable period and you should not insist on your version and put the onus on editors to justify why the original should be restored. Because it has stood the test of time and because you have already been reverted by
558:"A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Knowledge article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person."
813:
No reasonable person would draw the conclusion that the version you are holding up as a consensus article is written with proper weight for BLP about Thomas when he is in the lede as the only person mentioned in relation to the murder of the subjects.
628:
568:.) In any case, this article abruptly introduces Thomas's name by mentioning "A car axle linked to Arthur Allan Thomas..." with no proper explanation as to who he is. I have edited that sentence and added his name to the lede accordingly. --
890:
Thomas's rifle could ever have been part of the same single live round of ammunition.. Yet police said it had been found just where the killer would have ejected the spent cartridge.casing after firing through the louvre window at Mr Crewe.
513:
policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or
1188:(murders plural)? Plural used for Gene and Eugene Thomas, but singular for Smart and Hope, and Höglin and Paakkonen. Any reason why some are murder (singluar), and others murders (plural)? Is a clean-up to make all consistent required?
830:
He was the only person mentioned the lede apart from the victims, and the article ended by saying police in 2014 said Thomas was the only suspect. You cannot put stuff like that about a living person in an article, you
886:
since acquitted of those murders, Apart from completely ignoring BLP guidelines the offending edits about the discredited evidence used to convict Thomas are against the tenor of a an official inquiry’s conclusions.
629:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110716024845/http://www.radiolive.co.nz/Investigative-journalist-Pat-Booth-40-years-on-from-the-Crewe-Murders-and-what-he-thinks-really-happened/tabid/506/articleID/14237/Default.aspx
632:
328:
1000:
my way of thinking. Taken with his callous behaviour, seeming guilty knowledge of the baby, opportunity and motive one would have to say convictions have been got, and stuck, with not much more.
946:. On 22 June he had left his distraught 18 month old granddaughter alone in the house for 45 minutes, even though the infant could have gone without fluids for a critical five days for all an
1341:
293:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
294:
523:
289:
266:
633:
http://www.radiolive.co.nz/Investigative-journalist-Pat-Booth-40-years-on-from-the-Crewe-Murders-and-what-he-thinks-really-happened/tabid/506/articleID/14237/Default.aspx
1336:
660:
656:
642:
318:
1120:
1361:
1321:
243:
233:
1356:
1326:
1331:
1311:
509:
110:
1351:
1231:
417:
407:
209:
1316:
1097:
114:
1060:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1366:
1306:
1227:
1114:
118:
1126:
638:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
196:
157:
109:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
469:
383:
1346:
828:
A 2014 police review of the murder files confirmed that Thomas was the sole suspect, all other suspects having been eliminated.
753:
A 2014 police review of the murder files confirmed that Thomas was the sole suspect, all other suspects having been eliminated.
729:
A 2014 police review of the murder files confirmed that Thomas was the sole suspect, all other suspects having been eliminated.
105:
69:
1185:
784:
1226:: Knowledge articles actually seem to be a bit inconsistent on the use of the singular or plural for double-murders. Cf.
703:
44:
460:
440:
374:
351:
944:
although people had been calling him since the night of 17 June to ask why the Crewes were not answering their phone
1093:
612:
1259:
1051:
826:
I am very glad you have said that test of time version is what you want to go back to because it ended by saying
594:
659:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
522:. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see
1107:
1077:
694:
620:
590:
515:
824:
and are therefore running against consensus, the onus is on you to justify why your version is acceptable."
795:
and are therefore running against consensus, the onus is on you to justify why your version is acceptable.
598:
452:
434:
981:
You are telling me nothing about the background that I didn't already know, and it's all circumstantial.
1288:
1269:
1061:
1033:
1005:
956:
909:
846:
761:
736:
724:
678:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
666:
50:
619:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1284:
1029:
1001:
952:
905:
842:
773:
757:
732:
720:
1235:
1234:, even though in both cases the killings happened simultaneously. I've just raised this issue on the
205:
1292:
1247:
1216:
1197:
1176:
1157:
1139:
1086:
1037:
990:
960:
936:
913:
850:
804:
765:
740:
708:
577:
546:
32:
565:
537:
Thomas deserves a Wiki entry of his own. I'll add it to my to-do list if no one else moves first.
468:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
382:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
208:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1212:
1153:
986:
932:
800:
188:
663:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
679:
17:
1243:
1135:
573:
542:
97:
686:
1193:
1172:
553:
645:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
685:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
366:
345:
1300:
1208:
1149:
1101:
982:
928:
816:"Because it has stood the test of time and because you have already been reverted by
796:
779:
1239:
1131:
819:
790:
569:
538:
172:
151:
652:
201:
81:
63:
1268:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1189:
1168:
1148:- The Crewes were not notable for anything else, and the move is appropriate.
651:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
561:
178:
87:
1106:"If the person was the subject of a notable murder, then a title such as
552:
A bit late, but I'm not sure Thomas is independently notable, as per
564:, who does not have a standalone biography – his name redirects to
117:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
465:
379:
281:
260:
501:
26:
623:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
616:
1258:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
464:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
378:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
200:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1207:pros and cons from a purely grammatical viewpoint.
1184:, in principle, but just wondering if it should be
1064:. No further edits should be made to this section.
785:
Knowledge:Tendentious_editing#Righting_Great_Wrongs
655:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1272:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1167:. Sounds about right, fits with similar articles.
303:Knowledge:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
1342:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
306:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
641:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
1112:(Cf. other notable NZ murder cases such as
1279:Car axle as leading to Thomas beingCharged
1121:Murder of Urban Höglin and Heidi Paakkonen
1050:The following is a closed discussion of a
611:I have just modified one external link on
518:contentious material about living persons
429:
340:
255:
146:
58:
290:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
431:
342:
257:
148:
60:
30:
1232:Murders of Alison Parker and Adam Ward
1337:Low-importance Crime-related articles
1186:Murders of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe
7:
1098:Murder of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe
1069:The result of the move request was:
458:This article is within the scope of
372:This article is within the scope of
287:This article is within the scope of
194:This article is within the scope of
103:This article is within the scope of
1362:All WikiProject Women-related pages
1322:Mid-importance New Zealand articles
1228:Murder of Harry and Harriette Moore
1115:Murder of Ben Smart and Olivia Hope
49:It is of interest to the following
1357:C-Class WikiProject Women articles
25:
1127:Murders of Gene and Eugene Thomas
615:. Please take a moment to review
218:Knowledge:WikiProject New Zealand
1327:WikiProject New Zealand articles
451:
433:
365:
344:
280:
259:
221:Template:WikiProject New Zealand
181:
171:
150:
90:
80:
62:
31:
727:) 22:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
412:This article has been rated as
323:This article has been rated as
238:This article has been rated as
127:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
18:Talk:Harvey and Jeannette Crewe
1332:C-Class Crime-related articles
1312:WikiProject Biography articles
599:10:23, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
130:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1352:Low-importance Death articles
1038:21:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
991:19:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
961:18:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
937:22:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
510:biographies of living persons
472:and see a list of open tasks.
386:and see a list of open tasks.
297:and see a list of open tasks.
212:and see a list of open tasks.
1317:C-Class New Zealand articles
914:10:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
851:21:27, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
805:19:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
766:18:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
741:22:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
709:01:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
547:23:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
300:Crime and Criminal Biography
267:Crime and Criminal Biography
115:contribute to the discussion
520:must be removed immediately
478:Knowledge:WikiProject Women
392:Knowledge:WikiProject Death
1383:
1367:WikiProject Women articles
1307:C-Class biography articles
1094:Harvey and Jeannette Crewe
1043:Requested move 8 July 2018
1023:Sourced content reversions
731:Totally BLP unacceptable.
672:(last update: 5 June 2024)
613:Harvey and Jeannette Crewe
608:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
589:popular since her death.
484:WikiProject Women articles
481:Template:WikiProject Women
418:project's importance scale
395:Template:WikiProject Death
329:project's importance scale
244:project's importance scale
206:New Zealand-related topics
1248:01:51, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
1217:01:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
1198:01:32, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
1087:17:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
778:It is not a violation of
446:
411:
360:
322:
275:
237:
166:
75:
57:
1293:22:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
1265:Please do not modify it.
1177:08:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
1158:06:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
1140:05:53, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
1108:Murder of Kitty Genovese
1057:Please do not modify it.
578:23:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
995:Demler waiteing such a
604:External links modified
197:WikiProject New Zealand
1347:C-Class Death articles
309:Crime-related articles
39:This article is rated
106:WikiProject Biography
653:regular verification
583:
224:New Zealand articles
643:After February 2018
566:Bain family murders
533:Arthur Allan Thomas
1073:, per consensus. —
697:InternetArchiveBot
648:InternetArchiveBot
189:New Zealand portal
133:biography articles
45:content assessment
673:
591:Stephen AAGarrick
530:
529:
500:
499:
496:
495:
492:
491:
461:WikiProject Women
428:
427:
424:
423:
375:WikiProject Death
339:
338:
335:
334:
254:
253:
250:
249:
145:
144:
141:
140:
16:(Redirected from
1374:
1267:
1110:is appropriate."
1085:
1084:
1082:
1059:
823:
794:
777:
707:
698:
671:
670:
649:
584:Mrs Crewe's Name
524:this noticeboard
502:
486:
485:
482:
479:
476:
455:
448:
447:
437:
430:
400:
399:
396:
393:
390:
369:
362:
361:
356:
348:
341:
311:
310:
307:
304:
301:
284:
277:
276:
271:
263:
256:
226:
225:
222:
219:
216:
191:
186:
185:
184:
175:
168:
167:
162:
154:
147:
135:
134:
131:
128:
125:
111:join the project
100:
98:Biography portal
95:
94:
93:
84:
77:
76:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1297:
1296:
1281:
1276:
1263:
1078:
1075:
1074:
1055:
1045:
1025:
817:
788:
771:
748:
716:
701:
696:
664:
657:have permission
647:
621:this simple FaQ
606:
586:
535:
483:
480:
477:
474:
473:
397:
394:
391:
388:
387:
354:
308:
305:
302:
299:
298:
269:
223:
220:
217:
214:
213:
187:
182:
180:
160:
132:
129:
126:
123:
122:
96:
91:
89:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1380:
1378:
1370:
1369:
1364:
1359:
1354:
1349:
1344:
1339:
1334:
1329:
1324:
1319:
1314:
1309:
1299:
1298:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1274:
1260:requested move
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1220:
1219:
1201:
1200:
1179:
1161:
1160:
1092:
1090:
1067:
1066:
1052:requested move
1046:
1044:
1041:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
919:
918:
917:
916:
898:
897:
896:
895:
891:
887:
880:
879:
878:
877:
870:
869:
868:
867:
860:
859:
858:
857:
853:
835:
834:
833:
832:
808:
807:
747:
744:
715:
712:
691:
690:
683:
636:
635:
627:Added archive
605:
602:
585:
582:
581:
580:
534:
531:
528:
527:
516:poorly sourced
505:
498:
497:
494:
493:
490:
489:
487:
470:the discussion
456:
444:
443:
438:
426:
425:
422:
421:
414:Low-importance
410:
404:
403:
401:
398:Death articles
384:the discussion
370:
358:
357:
355:Low‑importance
349:
337:
336:
333:
332:
325:Low-importance
321:
315:
314:
312:
295:the discussion
285:
273:
272:
270:Low‑importance
264:
252:
251:
248:
247:
240:Mid-importance
236:
230:
229:
227:
210:the discussion
193:
192:
176:
164:
163:
161:Mid‑importance
155:
143:
142:
139:
138:
136:
102:
101:
85:
73:
72:
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1379:
1368:
1365:
1363:
1360:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1345:
1343:
1340:
1338:
1335:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1325:
1323:
1320:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1310:
1308:
1305:
1304:
1302:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1278:
1273:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1255:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1222:
1221:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1180:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1163:
1162:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1117:
1116:
1111:
1109:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1089:
1088:
1083:
1081:
1076:usernamekiran
1072:
1065:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1042:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1022:
1007:
1003:
998:
994:
993:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
962:
958:
954:
949:
945:
940:
939:
938:
934:
930:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
915:
911:
907:
902:
901:
900:
899:
892:
888:
884:
883:
882:
881:
874:
873:
872:
871:
864:
863:
862:
861:
854:
852:
848:
844:
839:
838:
837:
836:
829:
825:
821:
812:
811:
810:
809:
806:
802:
798:
792:
786:
781:
775:
770:
769:
768:
767:
763:
759:
754:
745:
743:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
713:
711:
710:
705:
700:
699:
688:
684:
681:
677:
676:
675:
668:
662:
658:
654:
650:
644:
639:
634:
630:
626:
625:
624:
622:
618:
614:
609:
603:
601:
600:
596:
592:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:
549:
548:
544:
540:
532:
525:
521:
517:
512:
511:
506:
504:
503:
488:
471:
467:
463:
462:
457:
454:
450:
449:
445:
442:
439:
436:
432:
419:
415:
409:
406:
405:
402:
385:
381:
377:
376:
371:
368:
364:
363:
359:
353:
350:
347:
343:
330:
326:
320:
317:
316:
313:
296:
292:
291:
286:
283:
279:
278:
274:
268:
265:
262:
258:
245:
241:
235:
232:
231:
228:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:
190:
179:
177:
174:
170:
169:
165:
159:
156:
153:
149:
137:
120:
119:documentation
116:
112:
108:
107:
99:
88:
86:
83:
79:
78:
74:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
1282:
1264:
1257:
1223:
1181:
1164:
1145:
1125:
1119:
1113:
1105:
1091:
1079:
1070:
1068:
1056:
1049:
1026:
996:
947:
943:
827:
815:
752:
749:
728:
717:
695:
692:
667:source check
646:
640:
637:
610:
607:
587:
557:
536:
519:
508:
459:
413:
373:
324:
288:
239:
195:
104:
51:WikiProjects
1285:Overagainst
1270:move review
1062:move review
1030:Overagainst
1002:Overagainst
953:Overagainst
906:Overagainst
843:Overagainst
774:Overagainst
758:Overagainst
733:Overagainst
721:Overagainst
215:New Zealand
202:New Zealand
158:New Zealand
1301:Categories
704:Report bug
562:David Bain
507:While the
1100:– As per
687:this tool
680:this tool
124:Biography
70:Biography
1236:WT:TITLE
1209:Akld guy
1150:Akld guy
983:Akld guy
948:innocent
929:Akld guy
797:Akld guy
693:Cheers.—
554:WP:CRIME
1240:Muzilon
1238:page.--
1224:Comment
1182:Support
1165:Support
1146:Support
1132:Muzilon
831:cannot.
820:Gadfium
791:Gadfium
714:Changes
617:my edit
570:Muzilon
539:Grimhim
416:on the
327:on the
242:on the
41:C-class
1124:; and
1102:WP:BIO
1080:(talk)
780:WP:BLP
47:scale.
1190:Paora
1169:Basie
1071:moved
560:(Cf.
475:Women
466:women
441:Women
389:Death
380:Death
352:Death
1289:talk
1244:talk
1230:vs.
1213:talk
1194:talk
1173:talk
1154:talk
1136:talk
1034:talk
1006:talk
997:very
987:talk
957:talk
933:talk
910:talk
847:talk
801:talk
762:talk
737:talk
725:talk
595:talk
574:talk
543:talk
204:and
113:and
1262:.
1130:.)
746:BLP
661:RfC
631:to
408:Low
319:Low
234:Mid
1303::
1291:)
1246:)
1215:)
1196:)
1175:)
1156:)
1138:)
1118:;
1104::
1096:→
1054:.
1036:)
989:)
959:)
935:)
912:)
849:)
803:)
764:)
739:)
674:.
669:}}
665:{{
597:)
576:)
556::
545:)
1287:(
1242:(
1211:(
1192:(
1171:(
1152:(
1134:(
1032:(
1008:)
1004:(
985:(
955:(
931:(
908:(
845:(
822::
818:@
799:(
793::
789:@
776::
772:@
760:(
735:(
723:(
706:)
702:(
689:.
682:.
593:(
572:(
541:(
526:.
420:.
331:.
246:.
121:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
