Knowledge

Talk:Heiltsuk

Source đź“ť

82: 64: 265: 199: 305: 189: 33: 154: 611:). The crafters of the ethnicities and tribes naming convention (which your guideline violates) clearly respected our collective decisions/consensus from long ago re both standalone names without "people/tribe/nation/peoples" unless absolutely necessary and also re the use of endonyms where available; but when I brought it up in the RMs of last year you insulted and baited me and 285: 337: 810:
Is that a template or just a copy-paste you're using to repeat your post across all these RMs? Hell I guess I'll copy paste to, since I'm replying to the same as-if-bot-generated comment. Here are view stats that debunk the premise that "people-language pairs" are a legitimate primarytopic equation,
828:
That's a more than 5:1 ratio....your premise that "people-language pairs" exist as equally primary topics is rubbish, and demonstrable over and over again; one of the many flawed in NCL. Next time your crew revises that guideline, you should learn some math first and actually look at stats and, oh,
795:
There was a discussion and a subsequent unanimous vote in favor of explicit disambiguation of people–language pairs. "Heiltsuk" can refer to both the people and the language, which means it falls under "Where a common name exists in English for both a people and their language, a title based on that
571:
There was a discussion once on whether the ethnicity should have precedence for the name, and it was decided it shouldn't. That could be revisited. But it really should be one discussion on the principle, not thousands of separate discussions at every ethnicity in the world over whether it should
601:
added as you rewrote your guideline to promote/enact. It says quite the opposite; the CRITERIA page also says that prior consensus should be respected, and those who crafted it an attempt to contact them towards building a new consensus done; and calls for consistency within related topics which
544:
of users, two - no three - have engaged in insults against me is beyond smug to the point of ridiculousness; an RfC may be required to change that guideline, as it's clear I'm shut out of any process involving that group of editors, who have been relentlessly contrarian and hostile to anything
627:
but that's a crock. The way to "address this issue properly" is to examine all of these, but bulk of them needless directs from then-long-standing titles moved by yourself, one by one as I was instructed/advised re the bulk RMs; as case-by-case decisions are needed. You want a centralized
596:
that's fine to say about a discussion that you presided over on an isolated guideline talkpage that you didn't invite anyone but your friends into..... WP:ETHNICGROUPS is clear on the variability of "X", "Xs", or "X people" and says nothing being people
591:
LOL that's funny I already tried that and got criticized for mis-procedure. Your pet guideline was never discussed at a central location nor even brought up with other affected/conflicting guidelines nor any relevant wikiprojects. And as for
136: 992: 130: 606:
long ago had devised the use of "FOO" and often "PREFERRED ENDONYM" (for Canada especially, where such terms are common English now and your pet terms are obsolete and in disuse and often of clearly racist origin e.g.
768:
per CambridgeBayWeather. In cases where the requested move simply eliminates the word "people", and the destination title is already a simple redirect to the current title, it is clear that guidelines favoring both
997: 987: 458:
guideline recommends the former arrangement as noted, we seen to be seeing a new consensus that this should change to accord with PRIMARYTOPIC. As with the others, this will benefit from a more centralized
106: 89: 69: 796:
term, with explicit disambiguation, is preferred for both articles". "Heiltsuk" was made a dab page in response to this guideline, only to be made a redirect later without discussion. --
528:"We" is not all of Knowledge obviously, it's you, Kwami and Uysvdi and other NCL regulars concocting a bad guideline (which is not a "policy") that is in conflict with various others. 1047: 1037: 717: 701: 1027: 1032: 1022: 1017: 1007: 245: 1012: 925: 921: 907: 650:
No, no-one would criticize you for discussing this rationally. But this multitude of move requests is disruptive. They should all be closed without prejudice. —
1002: 314: 172: 294: 168: 713: 255: 274: 164: 1042: 94: 540:
have to say about this. The smugness in your suggestion for me to "try to change the guideline" in in a space dominated by the same small
437:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
392:
There was a link to Central Coast's disambiguation page. I was going to redirect to an appropriate Central Coast page, but none exists.
748: 102: 903:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
221: 466: 510:. We have policy that the people should go at "XXX people" and the language at "XXX language", with "XXX" being a dab page, see 712:, there is no policy that says any such thing as articles must be at "foo people" or "foo language". There are two guidelines, 751:. I'll deal with Kwami's par-for-the course personal attack, as with other derisions elsewhere, through the proper channels. 594:"There was a discussion once on whether the ethnicity should have precedence for the name, and it was decided it shouldn't" 733: 968: 212: 159: 98: 44: 370: 671:
per nom. An identified people should be the primary topic of a term absent something remarkable standing in the way.
428: 374: 924:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
729: 725: 721: 697: 32: 959: 885: 451: 410:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
943:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
931: 893: 859: 655: 577: 537: 438: 407: 50: 884:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 529: 463: 450:
As with other similar moves recently, we have consensus for the people to be at the base name as the
378: 220:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
81: 63: 834: 756: 637: 550: 533: 497: 928:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
944: 264: 801: 774: 770: 519: 681: 651: 573: 566:
until the issue is addressed properly. These should be discussed at a centralized location.
345: 951: 782: 704:. There is no need to redo any guideline as it already supports the un-disabiguated title. 541: 477: 460: 304: 910:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 619:
and were in fact dismissive about any such effort. Pfft. NCLANG fans like to pretend
545:
upsetting the applecart they carefully concocted to please themselves..and no one else.
950:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
981: 830: 820: 752: 633: 620: 608: 546: 511: 493: 455: 411: 204: 17: 849: 814: 797: 709: 515: 393: 917: 672: 916:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 858:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
778: 194: 188: 153: 720:. Both of those guides support the un-disambiguated terms as does a policy, 336: 369:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 877: 481: 284: 894:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120210195438/http://www.bellabella.net/
217: 993:
Unknown-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
973: 838: 805: 786: 760: 737: 686: 659: 641: 581: 554: 523: 501: 471: 414: 396: 331: 26: 897: 303: 283: 263: 888:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
115:
Knowledge:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America
998:
WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
988:
Start-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
722:
Knowledge:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names
698:
Knowledge:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names
427:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
118:
Template:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America
881: 615:. Now you want a centralized discussion when you made 489: 486:
first converted into redirect by JorisV on June 8, 2011
485: 589:"These should be discussed at a centralized location." 514:. If you don't like that, try to change the policy. -- 848:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
718:
Knowledge:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes)
702:
Knowledge:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes)
216:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 93:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 920:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 441:. No further edits should be made to this section. 862:. No further edits should be made to this section. 135:This article has not yet received a rating on the 749:Talk:Bella Bella, British Columbia#Requested move 90:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America 906:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 1048:Knowledge articles that use Canadian English 1038:Low-importance Canadian communities articles 121:Indigenous peoples of North America articles 1028:Low-importance Geography of Canada articles 532:has been ignored by all of you as has what 30: 876:I have just modified one external link on 406:There is a move discussion in progress on 349:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 148: 58: 1033:Start-Class Canadian communities articles 492:with no regard to PRIMARYTOPIC or UNDAB. 1023:Start-Class Geography of Canada articles 1018:Low-importance British Columbia articles 714:Knowledge:Naming conventions (languages) 817:was viewed 547 times this month (March) 150: 60: 1008:Low-importance Canada-related articles 1013:Start-Class British Columbia articles 377:, this should not be changed without 7: 446:The result of the move request was: 210:This article is within the scope of 87:This article is within the scope of 1003:Start-Class Canada-related articles 572:be at "X", "Xs", or "X people". — 112:Indigenous peoples of North America 103:indigenous peoples of North America 70:Indigenous peoples of North America 49:It is of interest to the following 726:Knowledge:Article titles#Precision 25: 880:. Please take a moment to review 625:especially yourself as its author 335: 315:WikiProject Canadian communities 197: 187: 152: 80: 62: 31: 823:was viewed 106 times this month 295:WikiProject Geography of Canada 250:This article has been rated as 1: 397:23:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 312:This article is supported by 292:This article is supported by 272:This article is supported by 224:and see a list of open tasks. 109:and see a list of open tasks. 1043:All WikiProject Canada pages 974:09:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 275:WikiProject British Columbia 230:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada 99:Indigenous peoples in Canada 630:but never held one yourself 402:Move discussion in progress 233:Template:WikiProject Canada 1064: 937:(last update: 5 June 2024) 898:http://www.bellabella.net/ 873:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 839:16:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 806:15:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 787:17:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 761:09:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 738:03:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC) 687:02:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC) 660:14:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 642:12:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 582:12:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 555:09:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 524:09:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 502:05:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 484:– target page is dab page 415:09:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 256:project's importance scale 137:project's importance scale 472:13:26, 4 April 2014 (UTC) 311: 291: 271: 249: 182: 134: 75: 57: 855:Please do not modify it. 434:Please do not modify it. 869:External links modified 617:no such effort yourself 490:converted into dab page 236:Canada-related articles 308: 288: 268: 39:This article is rated 811:which is utter bunk: 408:Talk:Chipewyan people 307: 287: 267: 918:regular verification 375:relevant style guide 371:varieties of English 18:Talk:Heiltsuk people 908:After February 2018 821:"Heiltsuk language" 747:a related RM is at 730:CambridgeBayWeather 373:. According to the 962:InternetArchiveBot 913:InternetArchiveBot 777:support the move. 700:and the guideline 696:as per the policy 388:Central Coast link 309: 289: 269: 213:WikiProject Canada 45:content assessment 938: 815:"Heiltsuk people" 469: 385: 384: 330: 329: 326: 325: 322: 321: 147: 146: 143: 142: 16:(Redirected from 1055: 972: 963: 936: 935: 914: 857: 679: 467: 436: 346:Canadian English 342:This article is 339: 332: 238: 237: 234: 231: 228: 207: 202: 201: 200: 191: 184: 183: 178: 175: 165:British Columbia 156: 149: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 95:Native Americans 84: 77: 76: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 27: 21: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1054: 1053: 1052: 978: 977: 966: 961: 929: 922:have permission 912: 886:this simple FaQ 871: 866: 853: 829:sources too.... 673: 623:on this issue, 478:Heiltsuk people 452:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 432: 422: 404: 390: 379:broad consensus 235: 232: 229: 226: 225: 203: 198: 196: 176: 162: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1061: 1059: 1051: 1050: 1045: 1040: 1035: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1010: 1005: 1000: 995: 990: 980: 979: 956: 955: 948: 901: 900: 892:Added archive 870: 867: 865: 864: 850:requested move 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 826: 825: 824: 818: 790: 789: 763: 741: 740: 706: 705: 690: 689: 665: 664: 663: 662: 645: 644: 585: 584: 568: 567: 560: 559: 558: 557: 538:WP:ETHNICGROUP 475: 444: 443: 429:requested move 423: 421: 420:Requested move 418: 403: 400: 389: 386: 383: 382: 340: 328: 327: 324: 323: 320: 319: 310: 300: 299: 290: 280: 279: 270: 260: 259: 252:Low-importance 248: 242: 241: 239: 222:the discussion 209: 208: 192: 180: 179: 177:Low‑importance 157: 145: 144: 141: 140: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 101:, and related 85: 73: 72: 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1060: 1049: 1046: 1044: 1041: 1039: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1004: 1001: 999: 996: 994: 991: 989: 986: 985: 983: 976: 975: 970: 965: 964: 953: 949: 946: 942: 941: 940: 933: 927: 923: 919: 915: 909: 904: 899: 895: 891: 890: 889: 887: 883: 879: 874: 868: 863: 861: 856: 851: 846: 840: 836: 832: 827: 822: 819: 816: 813: 812: 809: 808: 807: 803: 799: 794: 793: 792: 791: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 767: 764: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 743: 742: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 708: 707: 703: 699: 695: 692: 691: 688: 685: 684: 680: 678: 677: 670: 667: 666: 661: 657: 653: 649: 648: 647: 646: 643: 639: 635: 631: 626: 622: 618: 614: 610: 609:Slavey people 605: 600: 595: 590: 587: 586: 583: 579: 575: 570: 569: 565: 562: 561: 556: 552: 548: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 526: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 506: 505: 504: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 474: 473: 470: 464: 462: 459:discussion.-- 457: 453: 449: 442: 440: 435: 430: 425: 424: 419: 417: 416: 413: 409: 401: 399: 398: 395: 387: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 347: 341: 338: 334: 333: 317: 316: 306: 302: 301: 297: 296: 286: 282: 281: 277: 276: 266: 262: 261: 257: 253: 247: 244: 243: 240: 223: 219: 215: 214: 206: 205:Canada portal 195: 193: 190: 186: 185: 181: 174: 170: 166: 161: 158: 155: 151: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 91: 86: 83: 79: 78: 74: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 960: 957: 932:source check 911: 905: 902: 875: 872: 854: 847: 765: 744: 710:User:JorisvS 693: 682: 675: 674: 668: 629: 628:discussion, 624: 621:WP:OWNership 616: 612: 603: 598: 593: 588: 563: 507: 476: 447: 445: 433: 426: 405: 391: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 343: 313: 293: 273: 251: 211: 88: 51:WikiProjects 860:move review 775:conciseness 599:mandatorily 534:WP:CRITERIA 439:move review 344:written in 173:Communities 41:Start-class 982:Categories 969:Report bug 613:still lost 461:Cúchullain 952:this tool 945:this tool 771:precision 454:. Though 359:travelled 169:Geography 958:Cheers.— 878:Heiltsuk 831:Skookum1 753:Skookum1 634:Skookum1 547:Skookum1 530:WP:UNDAB 494:Skookum1 482:Heiltsuk 412:RMCD bot 882:my edit 798:JorisvS 766:Support 745:Comment 694:Support 669:Support 516:JorisvS 394:Todd661 367:analyze 363:realize 254:on the 676:bd2412 564:Oppose 512:WP:NCL 508:Oppose 456:WP:NCL 355:centre 351:colour 227:Canada 218:Canada 160:Canada 47:scale. 779:Xoloz 652:kwami 574:kwami 542:cabal 488:then 448:Move. 835:talk 802:talk 783:talk 773:and 757:talk 734:talk 724:and 716:and 656:talk 638:talk 604:"we" 578:talk 551:talk 536:and 520:talk 498:talk 926:RfC 896:to 852:. 246:Low 131:??? 984:: 939:. 934:}} 930:{{ 837:) 804:) 785:) 759:) 736:) 728:. 658:) 640:) 580:) 553:) 522:) 500:) 480:→ 431:. 365:, 361:, 357:, 353:, 171:/ 167:/ 163:: 97:, 971:) 967:( 954:. 947:. 833:( 800:( 781:( 755:( 732:( 683:T 654:( 636:( 632:. 576:( 549:( 518:( 496:( 468:c 465:/ 381:. 318:. 298:. 278:. 258:. 139:. 53:: 20:)

Index

Talk:Heiltsuk people

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Indigenous peoples of North America
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America
Native Americans
Indigenous peoples in Canada
indigenous peoples of North America
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Canada
British Columbia
Geography
Communities
WikiProject icon
Canada portal
WikiProject Canada
Canada
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject British Columbia
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Geography of Canada

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑