Knowledge

Talk:Histogram

Source 📝

295: 274: 200: 85: 64: 190: 169: 619:, which discusses why encyclopedias and dictionaries differ—one primarily discusses terms, the other discusses the concepts they describe. Of course, etymology is part of the extant discussion of concepts, but most etymology sections in articles are frankly egregiously overrepresenting said discussion in sources because it's surface-level minutiae that's easy to regurgitate. For most articles presently with an etymology section, a balanced survey of the RSes would exclude such a section. 31: 370: 576:. The section, while being succinct, also covers not only the linguistic origin, but the history of the term (and the concept). It is treated in sources, it is clearly relevant to the historical understanding of the concept, that you do not like it is not a good reason to remove it. Etymology sections also routinely appear at the top of the articles; I have no qualms if we want to move it, but let it be known it would go against common practice. 728: 740: 95: 22: 542:, I hit enter too early so I'll elucidate better here. The passage is sourced, but it makes a short section out of of comparative minutiae when considered in the scope of the article, which is about the concept, not the term. This could be a bit tacked on to what was there, but it's a slightly egregious clutter at the top of the article as given before; see 484:
One of the figure shows the effect of choosing different bin counts for the same data, and the labels say "Bin width = 3", "Bin width = 8" and "Bin width = 29". First, it is not 8 but 6. Second, it is not the width of the bins which are set to 3, 8 and 29 but their number. So they should say "Bins =
589:
We can cover the etymology in exactly one sentence, perhaps a clause added to the sentence spun out from the original material. The added details add nothing but misdirections and fluff to what was an adequate explanation. We mention briefly what the etymology is, but why on earth should we add
464:
The article would benefit from mentioning the many valid points of criticism of the histograms. Also there lacks some information on the uncertainty of the histogram. It would be fair to mention some alternatives to histograms (e.g. empirical cdfs, kernel density estimates)
512:" but there is no reference given to any Excel documentation here either, nor demonstration that Excel did use this rule in 2007. The documentation to legacy versions which would be relevant does not mention what rule is used to select the number of bins 678:
In this case, it is effectively wasted space, as the misconceptions are corrected by the plain statement of the correct conception. Nothing substantial is lost by not mentioning the ways how other people don't know
516:. I propose simply deleting this section, since using the square root of the number of datapoints is unmotivated by any theoretical consideration and doesn't seem to have actually been used as claimed. 766: 345: 256: 903: 773: 381: 659:- Can you point me to what parts of the section are not about etymology? I see just part of the last sentence that could reasonably be construed as being more history than etymology. 918: 141: 832:
to include information about the origin of a tool in an encyclopedic tool. This isn't a pure dictionary info, its more of an origin and popularization of the tool section.
893: 913: 908: 35: 943: 335: 933: 246: 505: 888: 510:
The general rule Excel uses is equal-width intervals with the number of intervals approximately equal to the square root of the number of data points.
151: 948: 953: 898: 789:
There is a debate about the appropriateness of the current "Etymology" section. Should the current information be kept or should it be trimmed?
923: 222: 928: 311: 938: 117: 746: 513: 213: 174: 508:. Furthermore, the reference currently provided is not to official documentation, just to some notes by an economist which says " 302: 279: 883: 780: 757: 108: 69: 662:
In any case it doesn't look like we're going to agree, so I wonder if we can get some more outside input. I'll post a RfC.
837: 435: 430: 425: 420: 415: 410: 405: 44: 783:, remove this tag and it will be removed from the lists. If this page is on additional lists, they will be noted below. 504:
The reference to Excel using the square root rule is quite old. Recent versions of Excel, since 2016, use Scott's rule
506:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/office/create-a-histogram-85680173-064b-4024-b39d-80f17ff2f4e8#bkmk_scottrefrule
470: 375: 572:
I strongly disagree. We routinely cover the etymology of non-trivial terms -this has little or nothing to do with
388: 616: 573: 543: 833: 676:
Because it is good practice to reference common misconceptions and correct them. It is a service to readers.
653:
Because it is good practice to reference common misconceptions and correct them. It is a service to readers.
590:
several sentences about what the etymology isn't? Most of the contrived section isn't even about etymology.
116:
articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
521: 490: 466: 50: 517: 199: 294: 273: 647:- Sorry, what? "Misdirections" in which sense? Is there anything factually misleading that I missed? 21: 682:
I've made my case, but I'm willing to let it go instead of making you post an RfC if you disagree.
514:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/office/create-a-histogram-85680173-064b-4024-b39d-80f17ff2f4e8
310:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
221:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
84: 63: 858: 815: 795: 694: 668: 631: 602: 582: 558: 394: 205: 189: 168: 448: 390: 100: 877: 848: 829: 805: 790: 684: 663: 621: 592: 577: 548: 537: 486: 675: 218: 307: 195: 90: 651:
why on earth should we add several sentences about what the etymology isn't?
94: 803:
You're free to demure on this if you like, as I won't pursue it further.
113: 392: 866: 841: 823: 797: 702: 670: 639: 610: 584: 566: 525: 494: 474: 722: 395: 15: 657:
Most of the contrived section isn't even about etymology
306:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 217:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 762:This page has been added to the following lists: 846:See, an origin section is perfectly reasonable. 904:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Mathematics 645:The added details add nothing but misdirections 717:Should a section about etymology be included? 8: 919:Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles 364: 268: 163: 58: 894:Knowledge vital articles in Mathematics 760:from other editors for this discussion. 270: 165: 60: 19: 656: 650: 644: 914:B-Class WikiProject Business articles 909:B-Class vital articles in Mathematics 7: 734: 300:This article is within the scope of 211:This article is within the scope of 106:This article is within the scope of 49:It is of interest to the following 944:Top-importance Statistics articles 14: 934:Mid-priority mathematics articles 231:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 889:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 738: 726: 368: 320:Knowledge:WikiProject Statistics 293: 272: 234:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 198: 188: 167: 93: 83: 62: 29: 20: 949:WikiProject Statistics articles 340:This article has been rated as 323:Template:WikiProject Statistics 251:This article has been rated as 146:This article has been rated as 954:Knowledge requests for comment 899:B-Class level-5 vital articles 867:14:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 842:14:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 824:08:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 798:08:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 767:Maths, science, and technology 703:08:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 671:08:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 640:00:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 615:It also has plenty to do with 611:22:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 585:22:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 567:10:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 126:Knowledge:WikiProject Business 1: 924:WikiProject Business articles 495:18:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC) 475:14:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC) 314:and see a list of open tasks. 225:and see a list of open tasks. 132:WikiProject Business articles 129:Template:WikiProject Business 120:and see a list of open tasks. 929:B-Class mathematics articles 745:Please consider joining the 939:B-Class Statistics articles 970: 500:Square root rule and Excel 152:project's importance scale 859: 816: 695: 632: 603: 559: 526:20:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC) 447:This page is archived by 339: 288: 250: 183: 145: 78: 57: 774:Language and linguistics 747:feedback request service 257:project's priority scale 460:Criticism of histograms 214:WikiProject Mathematics 884:B-Class vital articles 303:WikiProject Statistics 531:Etymological minutiae 36:level-5 vital article 779:When discussion has 480:Wrong figure caption 237:mathematics articles 109:WikiProject Business 326:Statistics articles 834:Bluethricecreamman 758:requested comments 206:Mathematics portal 45:content assessment 787: 786: 753: 752: 617:WP:NOTADICTIONARY 574:WP:NOTADICTIONARY 544:WP:NOTADICTIONARY 457: 456: 452: 360: 359: 356: 355: 352: 351: 267: 266: 263: 262: 162: 161: 158: 157: 961: 865: 863: 857: 853: 822: 820: 814: 810: 793: 742: 741: 735: 730: 729: 723: 701: 699: 693: 689: 677: 666: 638: 636: 630: 626: 609: 607: 601: 597: 580: 565: 563: 557: 553: 541: 467:Troelspedersen80 446: 396: 372: 371: 365: 346:importance scale 328: 327: 324: 321: 318: 297: 290: 289: 284: 276: 269: 239: 238: 235: 232: 229: 208: 203: 202: 192: 185: 184: 179: 171: 164: 134: 133: 130: 127: 124: 103: 98: 97: 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 42: 33: 32: 25: 24: 16: 969: 968: 964: 963: 962: 960: 959: 958: 874: 873: 855: 849: 847: 812: 806: 804: 791: 754: 739: 727: 719: 691: 685: 683: 664: 628: 622: 620: 599: 593: 591: 578: 555: 549: 547: 535: 533: 502: 487:Andras Vanyolos 482: 462: 453: 397: 391: 369: 325: 322: 319: 316: 315: 282: 236: 233: 230: 227: 226: 204: 197: 177: 131: 128: 125: 122: 121: 101:Business portal 99: 92: 72: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 30: 12: 11: 5: 967: 965: 957: 956: 951: 946: 941: 936: 931: 926: 921: 916: 911: 906: 901: 896: 891: 886: 876: 875: 872: 871: 870: 869: 826: 785: 784: 778: 777: 770: 756:An editor has 751: 750: 743: 733: 731: 718: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 680: 660: 654: 648: 532: 529: 501: 498: 481: 478: 461: 458: 455: 454: 445: 444: 441: 440: 439: 438: 433: 428: 423: 418: 413: 408: 400: 399: 398: 393: 389: 387: 386: 373: 362: 358: 357: 354: 353: 350: 349: 342:Top-importance 338: 332: 331: 329: 312:the discussion 298: 286: 285: 283:Top‑importance 277: 265: 264: 261: 260: 249: 243: 242: 240: 223:the discussion 210: 209: 193: 181: 180: 172: 160: 159: 156: 155: 148:Mid-importance 144: 138: 137: 135: 118:the discussion 105: 104: 88: 76: 75: 73:Mid‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 966: 955: 952: 950: 947: 945: 942: 940: 937: 935: 932: 930: 927: 925: 922: 920: 917: 915: 912: 910: 907: 905: 902: 900: 897: 895: 892: 890: 887: 885: 882: 881: 879: 868: 864: 862: 854: 852: 845: 844: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 825: 821: 819: 811: 809: 802: 801: 800: 799: 796: 794: 782: 776: 775: 771: 769: 768: 764: 763: 761: 759: 748: 744: 737: 736: 732: 725: 724: 721: 716: 704: 700: 698: 690: 688: 681: 674: 673: 672: 669: 667: 661: 658: 655: 652: 649: 646: 643: 642: 641: 637: 635: 627: 625: 618: 614: 613: 612: 608: 606: 598: 596: 588: 587: 586: 583: 581: 575: 571: 570: 569: 568: 564: 562: 554: 552: 545: 539: 530: 528: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 499: 497: 496: 492: 488: 479: 477: 476: 472: 468: 459: 450: 443: 442: 437: 434: 432: 429: 427: 424: 422: 419: 417: 414: 412: 409: 407: 404: 403: 402: 401: 384: 383: 378: 377: 367: 366: 363: 347: 343: 337: 334: 333: 330: 313: 309: 305: 304: 299: 296: 292: 291: 287: 281: 278: 275: 271: 258: 254: 248: 245: 244: 241: 224: 220: 216: 215: 207: 201: 196: 194: 191: 187: 186: 182: 176: 173: 170: 166: 153: 149: 143: 140: 139: 136: 119: 115: 111: 110: 102: 96: 91: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 37: 27: 23: 18: 17: 860: 850: 817: 807: 788: 772: 765: 755: 720: 696: 686: 633: 623: 604: 594: 560: 550: 534: 518:WikiNukalito 509: 503: 483: 463: 380: 374: 361: 341: 301: 253:Mid-priority 252: 212: 178:Mid‑priority 147: 107: 51:WikiProjects 34: 828:Yes. Seems 449:ClueBot III 228:Mathematics 219:mathematics 175:Mathematics 878:Categories 317:Statistics 308:statistics 280:Statistics 485:3", etc. 39:is rated 851:Remsense 808:Remsense 792:cyclopia 687:Remsense 665:cyclopia 624:Remsense 595:Remsense 579:cyclopia 551:Remsense 538:Cyclopia 376:Archives 123:Business 114:business 70:Business 344:on the 255:on the 150:on the 41:B-class 830:WP:DUE 47:scale. 781:ended 382:Index 28:This 838:talk 522:talk 491:talk 471:talk 436:2017 431:2016 426:2015 421:2014 416:2013 411:2012 406:2011 679:it. 336:Top 247:Mid 142:Mid 880:: 856:‥ 840:) 813:‥ 692:‥ 629:‥ 600:‥ 556:‥ 546:. 524:) 493:) 473:) 385:) 861:论 836:( 818:论 749:. 697:论 634:论 605:论 561:论 540:: 536:@ 520:( 489:( 469:( 451:. 379:( 348:. 259:. 154:. 53::

Index


level-5 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Business
WikiProject icon
icon
Business portal
WikiProject Business
business
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Mid
project's priority scale
WikiProject icon
Statistics
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Statistics
statistics
the discussion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.