95:
85:
64:
297:, the results of the books search for this case favour my proposal. Searching for the "Huai'an County" of Hebei and Jiangsu, with or without (wrong) the apostrophe, gives a combined 13,610 and 2,194 results, respectively. In any case, Pengyanan's mass moves are confusing because they were unexplained. Heaven forbid I find another case like this, especially one where the two candidates for primary topic are
33:
292:
I proposed a move of "Nanshi
District, Baoding" to "Nanshi District" with the same rationale, but as the Nanshi District of SH is important historically, Kauffner utilised the results of a Google Books search as evidence to oppose it. Searching "Nanshi District, Shanghai" produced 90 times more
386:
prefer adequate knowledge on language and/or geography, as I have been hampered several times by quite bluntly, unqualified, bureaucratic-based opinions/reasons. See the RFD's that I nominated from 26 and 4 March to see what I am talking about. I in fact
378:
nomination at that point, however ridiculous or merit-bearing the opinions may have been, I was bound to be upset. This is not to mention the busy work regarding administrative divisions that I have been asked to
373:
Well hopefully that was an instruction to observers of this discussion...I had already participated in the move request there. Not to sound like I am attempting to use excuses, but when I had been opposed in
534:
215:" is really today's Chuzhou District of Huai'an City, Jiangsu. Current names for entities should take precedent over former ones, as outlined by WP:TITLECHANGES: "WP describes current usage..."
529:
141:
524:
151:
447:
I try hard to consider both facts and policy. I very strongly suggest you do the same. But take heart, one of the core policies is after all
539:
334:. Note that the closing admin (not me) specifically spoke of exactly the same misinterpretation of the guidelines as appears above.
117:
331:
44:
509:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
182:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
412:
318:
253:
108:
69:
116:
related articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
212:
274:
32:
452:
266:
204:
195:
50:
477:
481:
17:
489:
360:
282:
222:
84:
63:
191:
403:
309:
244:
208:
460:
236:
518:
448:
344:
340:
485:
356:
278:
218:
100:
431:
Could you provide links to the RFDs if they are relevant? I looked for the latest
456:
90:
226:
382:
In this case, "qualified" would only have to cite statistics. In an RFD, I
493:
418:
364:
324:
286:
259:
199:
459:(in the negative sense you mean) having such a policy, can you? See also
293:
results than "Nanshi
District, Baoding" (with or without the comma) did.
391:
you to participate in those two, but obviously would prefer you do so
176:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.
503:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.
113:
26:
432:
269:, misinterprets the guideline. The guideline refers to
339:
Note also the reference in the previous discussion to
480:
would do you no harm at all IMO. You might also find
273:, which may (and often does) differ from the current
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
535:
Stub-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
305:opposition, then this will be moved anyway. --
8:
301:, as is the case here. If there is no real,
58:
30:
395:you have carefully considered the facts,
225:) 19:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Relisted. --
265:Comment: The rationale above, based on
60:
476:But frankly, a good read or reread of
530:Low-importance China-related articles
7:
106:This article is within the scope of
49:It is of interest to the following
25:
525:Stub-Class China-related articles
93:
83:
62:
31:
146:This article has been rated as
18:Talk:Huai'an County, Hebei
299:written differently in Chinese
1:
332:Talk:Nanshi District, Baoding
120:and see a list of open tasks.
434:but it's not obvious to me.
217:Relisted again, see below.
126:Knowledge:WikiProject China
556:
540:WikiProject China articles
325:21:43, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
287:19:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
260:20:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
238:18:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
200:22:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
152:project's importance scale
129:Template:WikiProject China
494:06:44, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
455:. I can't imagine a real
419:03:45, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
365:03:39, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
145:
78:
57:
506:Please do not modify it.
179:Please do not modify it.
484:helpful, I'm not sure.
213:Huai'an County, Jiangsu
347:. What do you mean by
132:China-related articles
39:This article is rated
399:policy, presented. --
205:Huai'an County, Hebei
451:, the fifth of the
482:user:andrewa/creed
303:evidence-supported
45:content assessment
402:
355:(your emphasis)?
308:
243:
239:
166:
165:
162:
161:
158:
157:
109:WikiProject China
16:(Redirected from
547:
508:
415:
410:
406:
400:
321:
316:
312:
306:
256:
251:
247:
241:
233:
230:
216:
181:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
96:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
555:
554:
550:
549:
548:
546:
545:
544:
515:
514:
513:
504:
413:
408:
404:
319:
314:
310:
267:WP:TITLECHANGES
254:
249:
245:
231:
228:
177:
171:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
99:
94:
92:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
553:
551:
543:
542:
537:
532:
527:
517:
516:
512:
511:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
424:
423:
422:
421:
380:
368:
367:
336:
335:
290:
289:
209:Huai'an County
185:
184:
172:
170:
169:Requested move
167:
164:
163:
160:
159:
156:
155:
148:Low-importance
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
552:
541:
538:
536:
533:
531:
528:
526:
523:
522:
520:
510:
507:
501:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
433:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
420:
417:
416:
407:
398:
394:
390:
385:
381:
377:
372:
371:
370:
369:
366:
362:
358:
354:
352:
346:
342:
338:
337:
333:
329:
328:
327:
326:
323:
322:
313:
304:
300:
296:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:official name
272:
271:current usage
268:
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
257:
248:
237:
235:
234:
224:
220:
214:
210:
206:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
183:
180:
174:
173:
168:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
505:
502:
478:WP:consensus
453:five pillars
411:
396:
392:
388:
383:
376:every single
375:
350:
348:
317:
302:
298:
294:
291:
270:
252:
227:
203:
188:No consensus
187:
186:
178:
175:
147:
107:
101:China portal
51:WikiProjects
457:bureaucracy
192:Vegaswikian
519:Categories
405:Roundtable
393:only after
353:opposition
311:Roundtable
246:Roundtable
41:Stub-class
351:qualified
190:to move.
486:Andrewa
461:WP:BURO
389:welcome
357:Andrewa
295:However
279:Andrewa
219:Andrewa
150:on the
449:WP:IAR
414:Record
384:really
349:real,
345:WP:OWN
341:WP:NPA
320:Record
255:Record
242:HXL's
47:scale.
401:HXL's
307:HXL's
123:China
114:China
70:China
490:talk
361:talk
343:and
330:See
283:talk
223:talk
196:talk
409:and
397:not
379:do.
315:and
250:and
211:— "
142:Low
521::
492:)
363:)
285:)
277:.
240:--
232:Ga
229:Ja
207:→
198:)
488:(
463:.
359:(
281:(
221:(
194:(
154:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
