Knowledge

Talk:HubPages

Source đź“ť

182: 158: 74: 53: 84: 238: 376: 532: 22: 1339:
not just press releases) should we care about petitions. Knowledge is not a breaking news site. We're not here to report every new thing that happens to every subject. A good question to ask when submitting this stuff is, "will anyone care about this in 10 years?" If the answer is "who knows" or "probably not", then the content probably doesn't belong in the article, even if sourced. Per
1273:
HubPages requires you (assuming you are a US citizen) to give them your SSN prior to being paid?" and Deborah-Diane responded, "Yes, I did give them my Social Security Number when I started with HubPages about four years ago. I've never had a problem as a result. Periodically, they contact me to make sure my info is all correct." Source: www.infobarrel.com/forum-topic.php?id=12698
287: 266: 297: 1109: 1413:, so waiting for consensus is always an option. 2) I have no idea what argument you're trying to make by bringing up "checks and balances". Again, we're not here to promote petitions, as any yahoo with an opinion can start a Change.org petition. Big deal. This doesn't translate to encyclopedic content. And as I've already said, we're 1100:
Naturally we don't need every criterion, only a representative sample. Our job here is to provide a summary overview, not to include every detail about the service. To answer your last question: as this is a community project and articles are ever-evolving all editors have a say in these matters. Per
726:
I removed the competitor section because it was unsourced POV. Similar companies can be viewed by clicking one of the categories at the end of the article, which will provide more up-to-date listings of other websites or companies. Criticisms (as well as praise, etc.) of the company should be sourced
1433:
has been provided. Reiterating what I said above, "only when mainstream news websites start to care about this petition and write about from an analytical perspective (i.e. not just press releases) should we care about petitions." The mere existence of the petition doesn't guarantee inclusion. Until
1011:
business. What we should be describing in the article is what the company does, what they provide as a service, when they started, who the main actors are, who are served, and the rest of the Ws. If there are any problems that the company needs to clarify for their customers, that content belongs on
1363:
On Knowledge, Apple Inc. has included info about "a class action lawsuit in California." The paragraph concluded with "on November 7, 2015, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order granting Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing each and every
1338:
to be brought back on the air or if they're from a bunch of angry people who want to shake stuff up at HubPages headquarters. Knowledge is not a soapbox. Like any other subject, only when mainstream news websites start to care about this petition and write about from an analytical perspective (i.e.
1272:
Yes, it is deceptive (I feel) that HubPages Terms of Use has coupled "Account Closure and Inactivity" into one section. I asked in InfoBarrel's forum: "It would appear that HubPages has made it a condition of being paid that you hand over your tax information. Since I'm Canadian, can you tell me if
1202:
current tax information" (which we all do) but I felt it important to write it as "submit current tax information to HubPages (including SSN)" since I was taken aback that this was required. Also, if any ONE of those criteria are not met, HubPages keeps all of an author's earnings, permanently. You
959:
pages can only be used for content that is not unduly self promotional i have made some edits to the article to in some ways address your concerns that things were being misrepresented. however, we are not here to ensure that the article is filled with marketers hyperbole or meaningless jargon. --
1305:
Is there some way I can request a single page to be removed from the blacklist? The HubPages CEO recently wrote an article on the history of HubPages and it mentioned the merger with Squidoo, which is a key part of the HubPages story and not currently mentioned anywhere on the HubPages Knowledge
1236:
It seemed to me that this content was under the section on inactivity, which tended to suggest that if you became inactive, or closed your account, and if the other criteria were not met, then you'd forfeit the money. If you could clarify that for me, I'd appreciate it. Thanks,
974:
I'm marking it as declined to take it out of the queue for now. The first request was a promotional re-wording. The second and third looked like proper corrections and perhaps acceptable use of a primary source, but I notice the text itself is no longer in the article.
1168:, but of course feel free to tweak as necessary. As you have also found out, I couldn't use HubPages own website as a reference because of a blacklist, so I've asked that the Terms of Use page be added to the whitelist just below your whitelist request. Regards, 1331:
I removed content about a Change.org petition that was launched against the company for some reason or another that was submitted by a single-purpose account in good faith. We're not here to promote these common petitions, whether they're about fans wanting
1090:"...members are eligible to earn funds from the ad revenue generated by their pages, provided they adhere to specific criteria in the service's Terms of Service agreement. For example, users must maintain consistent activity, must provide tax information..." 1408:
if you are reverted, the onus is on you to open a discussion on the article's talk page until consensus for inclusion exists. I opened the discussion for you. Restoring the content was inappropriate and has been undone. Thankfully there is
1035:, I felt it was misleading to only have the following statement about earnings: "If members sign up for one of HubPages "affiliate and earnings programs", the members are eligible to earn funds from the ad revenue generated by their pages." 1138:, My apologies. This was my first edit. I completely see your point and I agree. I will summarize the TOS instead and add a "representative" sample as suggested (later on today). Thank you for explaining the process as well. Best, 1358:@Cyphoidbomb, The Change.org petition has already been through several checks and balances. This is not "soapbox" material. Witnesses (including authors and charities) have come forward to offer support and additional proof. 1105:, you make a bold edit (which you did), I revert, (which I did), and then we discuss (we're doing that!) Ideally we'll discuss in a friendly manner and arrive at something that achieves both your goals as well as mine. 1007:. It wasn't for a while that I realized that was reverting the bulk of a very recent edit. Anyhow, no disrespect intended. I don't quite see the point of including quotes from the company's Terms of Service. That's 745:
Hubpages seems to be spammy wasteland of poorly written articles similar to what you would see on a cyber squatter's page of loosely related links. Couldn't there be some mention of this on the wikipedia entry?
1369:
If you feel this Change.org petition is frivolous, why not let the facts "speak for themselves." Once California's attorney general, Kamala Harris, has dealt with this petition, you can update this page.
394: 228: 1485: 497: 799:"HubPages is a user generated content, revenue-sharing website." should be: HubPages is a writing platform and revenue-sharing website with a focus on long format, media-rich articles. 1040:
There are strict criteria that a member must meet on HubPages in order to be compensated. They include surrendering tax information (even though HubPages does not require it) and to
832:
As to the first edit, what is the difference between " a user generated content ... website" and "a writing platform" and can you supply a source that supports this proposed change?
886: 1525: 891: 881: 1048:
truth about the "Stucture" of HubPages. I can reword it, but I felt with a citation that the original wording was (and is) the proof that readers require and deserve.
912:
I was to understand from the guidelines that as a HubPages employee, I can not request that the page be removed from the blacklist due to a conflict of interest.
1495: 1480: 1203:
had stated as "If these criteria are not met, the members' earnings may be forfeited." I hope you find my changes acceptable. Once again, thank you. Sincerely,
222: 433: 420: 1088:, I think you're already on the right track in your comment above, which already begins to summarize the TOS sufficiently. Something along the lines of: 353: 1425:. These articles describe the lawsuits from an external perspective, not from an internal one. In contrast, the Change.org petition only represents the 1434:
then, your recourse is to find and include news sites that are reporting on the significance of this subject, or to wait for input from other editors.
1465: 140: 130: 1418: 1515: 343: 1044:
be "inactive" (according to what HubPages defines as "inactive"). My original Terms of Use addition was not meant as a "scrape" but to provide the
1520: 1490: 1422: 1475: 1470: 1460: 1510: 1309: 919: 864: 818: 407: 319: 1283:
I also found a forum post (on HubPages) wherein a Canadian had to "submit her passport" to HubPages (I am still looking for that thread).
1404:
Two points: 1) You don't have consensus for the inclusion of this content as another editor (myself) has objected to its inclusion. Per
572: 427: 106: 753: 1530: 1386: 588: 1069: 777: 685: 1500: 550: 310: 271: 247: 168: 1505: 787: 542: 488: 198: 189: 163: 97: 58: 1198:, It was so kind of you to make that edit, thank you. I just tweaked it slightly. For example, you stated members need to " 627:
HubPages is mentioned by relevant Internet sources to an extent that makes it notable -Mashables -TechCrunch -Quantcast
604: 401: 388: 33: 1417:. As for your Apple example, the references used that make the content noteworthy are two National Law Review articles 682: 414: 681:
to do with notability), I would agree that HubPages is solidly notably. Here's a Washington Post article about it:
848:
Is there a more neutral phrase we could use other than "media-rich", which sounds awfully "talking point-y" to me?
835:
For the second proposed edit (to the structure section, again can you provide a source that supports this change?
961: 943: 1313: 923: 868: 822: 636:
HubPages has a lot of content -with nearly 100,000 individual hubs. -and an average of 67 visitors/hub/month.
21: 639:
HubPages is at least as notable as Squidoo -Relatively equal traffic -Much higher traffic on a per hub basis
783: 566: 546: 1053:
Do Knowledge editors have the power to decide what to include or do I reword that section? Please advise.
582: 757: 460: 1439: 1382: 1348: 1242: 1173: 1117: 1017: 853: 653:
Hubpages was selected as one of two case studies for Google's AdSense API (the other site was Blogger)
562: 440: 181: 157: 39: 1401: 1378: 578: 83: 73: 52: 1410: 1374: 1291: 1287: 1231: 1208: 1204: 1143: 1139: 1085: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1004: 980: 915: 749: 661: 644: 318:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
839: 736: 710: 863:
I'm being prohibited to link to HubPages FAQ to cite my sources. Is there some way to fix this?
1426: 1414: 902: 1435: 1344: 1267: 1238: 1195: 1169: 1135: 1113: 1028: 1013: 1012:
the company's site, not at Knowledge. An enyclopedia should not be shouldering that burden.
849: 692: 598: 446: 302: 976: 657: 640: 477: 89: 1429:, i.e. the people who are complaining. So far no external analysis of this petition from 633:
Hubpages is the first site to integrate Google AdSense API to share revenue with writers
197:
on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
453: 375: 1454: 1405: 1102: 836: 732: 706: 654: 237: 1430: 898: 892:
MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/March_2012#Hallettestoneoin_Seazoria_Dragons
882:
MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/April_2008#Request_unlisting_of_hubpages.com
728: 934:
come to my talk page and place the URL to the FAQ or About Us there replacing the
1340: 1334: 688: 594: 555:
Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 25 July 2023 by
1286:
Does that answer your question? If not, I'll keep on trying to clarify. Yours,
292: 79: 541:
to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
556: 956:
sorry for the delay in responding. the hubpages websites FAQ and about us
677:
In spite of my criticism below that I think hubpages is a scam (which has
102: 315: 286: 265: 194: 878:
It appears to be on the blacklist, see this selection of discussions:
776: 630:
HubPages gets a lot of traffic (over 6,000,000 unique views/month)
624:
I see there's some past, but let's look at the present situation:
193:, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major 673:
Updated the Google Adsense link since the previous link was bad.
887:
MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/October_2011#Hubpages.com
1443: 1390: 1352: 1317: 1295: 1246: 1212: 1177: 1147: 1121: 1073: 1021: 984: 969: 951: 927: 906: 872: 857: 841: 826: 761: 739: 713: 696: 665: 648: 771: 526: 15: 395:
Knowledge:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
236: 1364:
claim brought against Apple by the employees in this case."
539:
contributors may be personally or professionally connected
796:
I'd like to make a few corrections to the current page.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1328: 1165: 1000: 957: 812:“...by a 50/50 split with publishers.” should be: by a 702: 805:“...(usually 400 to 1,500 words)” should be: (usually 314:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1486:
Start-Class Websites articles of Unknown-importance
227:This article has not yet received a rating on the 655:http://code.google.com/apis/adsense/hubpages.html 1343:, "verifiability does not guarantee inclusion". 1003:I removed content submitted in good faith by 8: 701:Removed edits referenced above can be seen 591:) This user has contributed to the article. 575:) This user has contributed to the article. 434:Category:Company articles needing infoboxes 421:Category:Company articles needing attention 19: 383:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 361: 260: 152: 47: 1526:Articles edited by connected contributors 722:Removed competitor section (January 2011) 814:40/60 split with 60% to the publishers. 727:to news reporting from sources meeting 262: 154: 49: 1496:Unknown-importance Computing articles 1031:: Since the title of this section is 459:Help expand stub articles located at 7: 1481:Unknown-importance Websites articles 1106: 408:Category:Unassessed company articles 308:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 1027:To address Knowledge Editors and 1466:Low-importance Internet articles 1107: 775: 530: 485:Tag company talk pages with the 374: 295: 285: 264: 180: 156: 82: 72: 51: 20: 1516:Low-importance company articles 348:This article has been rated as 328:Knowledge:WikiProject Companies 135:This article has been rated as 1521:WikiProject Companies articles 1491:Start-Class Computing articles 474:Tag company articles with the 331:Template:WikiProject Companies 207:Knowledge:WikiProject Websites 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Internet 1: 1476:Start-Class Websites articles 1471:WikiProject Internet articles 1461:Start-Class Internet articles 1444:21:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC) 1391:06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC) 1353:06:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC) 827:23:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 322:and see a list of open tasks. 245:This article is supported by 210:Template:WikiProject Websites 118:Template:WikiProject Internet 109:and see a list of open tasks. 1511:Start-Class company articles 970:18:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 952:13:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 928:21:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC) 907:21:32, 14 January 2014 (UTC) 873:21:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC) 858:20:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC) 842:20:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC) 740:22:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC) 714:22:15, 29 January 2011 (UTC) 697:15:29, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 620:a7 Notability and Importance 365:WikiProject Companies To-do: 1323:Removal of petition content 995:Quote scraping from the TOS 684:. Here's another article: 1547: 1431:reliable published sources 802:In the Structure section: 762:03:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 354:project's importance scale 141:project's importance scale 1318:16:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC) 666:02:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 649:01:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 360: 347: 280: 244: 226: 175: 134: 67: 46: 1531:Declined requested edits 1415:not a breaking news site 1411:no deadline at Knowledge 1166:already taken care of it 985:17:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC) 537:The following Knowledge 187:This article is part of 1296:21:12, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 1247:20:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 1213:20:48, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 1178:18:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 1148:18:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 1122:15:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 1074:04:48, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 1022:04:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC) 965:aka The Red Pen of Doom 947:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1501:All Computing articles 461:Category:Company stubs 241: 28:This article is rated 1506:All Websites articles 551:neutral point of view 498:requests for comments 489:WikiProject Companies 311:WikiProject Companies 248:WikiProject Computing 240: 788:conflict of interest 786:by an editor with a 543:conflict of interest 190:WikiProject Websites 98:WikiProject Internet 611:edited the article. 242: 34:content assessment 1394: 1377:comment added by 1077: 1060:comment added by 966: 948: 918:comment added by 794: 793: 752:comment added by 617: 616: 525: 524: 521: 520: 517: 516: 513: 512: 509: 508: 259: 258: 255: 254: 213:Websites articles 151: 150: 147: 146: 121:Internet articles 1538: 1393: 1371: 1271: 1235: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1076: 1054: 967: 964: 949: 946: 930: 809:to 1,500 words) 779: 772: 764: 607:) This user has 534: 533: 527: 492: 481: 447:Portal:Companies 389:Article requests 378: 371: 370: 362: 336: 335: 334:company articles 332: 329: 326: 305: 303:Companies portal 300: 299: 298: 289: 282: 281: 276: 268: 261: 229:importance scale 215: 214: 211: 208: 205: 184: 177: 176: 171: 160: 153: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1451: 1450: 1372: 1325: 1303: 1301:Requested edits 1265: 1229: 1164:No probs. I've 1108: 1055: 997: 962: 944: 913: 770: 768:Requested edits 747: 724: 622: 531: 505: 502: 486: 475: 333: 330: 327: 324: 323: 301: 296: 294: 274: 212: 209: 206: 203: 202: 166: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 90:Internet portal 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 1544: 1542: 1534: 1533: 1528: 1523: 1518: 1513: 1508: 1503: 1498: 1493: 1488: 1483: 1478: 1473: 1468: 1463: 1453: 1452: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1427:primary source 1396: 1395: 1366: 1365: 1360: 1359: 1324: 1321: 1310:38.111.148.243 1302: 1299: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1079: 1078: 1050: 1049: 1037: 1036: 996: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 920:38.111.148.243 910: 909: 896: 895: 894: 889: 884: 865:38.111.148.243 861: 860: 845: 844: 833: 819:38.111.148.243 792: 791: 780: 769: 766: 744: 723: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 621: 618: 615: 614: 613: 612: 610: 592: 576: 554: 535: 523: 522: 519: 518: 515: 514: 511: 510: 507: 506: 504: 503: 501: 500: 494: 493:project banner 483: 471: 463: 449: 436: 423: 410: 397: 382: 380: 379: 367: 366: 358: 357: 350:Low-importance 346: 340: 339: 337: 320:the discussion 307: 306: 290: 278: 277: 275:Low‑importance 269: 257: 256: 253: 252: 243: 233: 232: 225: 219: 218: 216: 185: 173: 172: 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Low-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1543: 1532: 1529: 1527: 1524: 1522: 1519: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1507: 1504: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1494: 1492: 1489: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1469: 1467: 1464: 1462: 1459: 1458: 1456: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1407: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1368: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1337: 1336: 1330: 1322: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1300: 1298: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1284: 1269: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1233: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1104: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1010: 1006: 1002: 994: 986: 982: 978: 973: 972: 971: 968: 958: 955: 954: 953: 950: 941: 938:portion with 937: 933: 932: 931: 929: 925: 921: 917: 908: 904: 900: 897: 893: 890: 888: 885: 883: 880: 879: 877: 876: 875: 874: 870: 866: 859: 855: 851: 847: 846: 843: 840: 838: 834: 831: 830: 829: 828: 824: 820: 816: 815: 810: 808: 803: 800: 797: 790:was declined. 789: 785: 781: 778: 774: 773: 767: 765: 763: 759: 755: 751: 742: 741: 738: 734: 730: 721: 715: 712: 708: 704: 700: 699: 698: 694: 690: 686: 683: 680: 676: 675: 674: 671: 668: 667: 663: 659: 656: 651: 650: 646: 642: 637: 634: 631: 628: 625: 619: 608: 606: 603: 600: 596: 593: 590: 587: 584: 580: 577: 574: 571: 568: 564: 563:Domenicstrazz 561: 560: 558: 552: 548: 547:autobiography 544: 540: 536: 529: 528: 499: 495: 490: 484: 479: 473: 472: 470: 468: 464: 462: 458: 456: 455: 450: 448: 445: 443: 442: 437: 435: 432: 430: 429: 424: 422: 419: 417: 416: 411: 409: 406: 404: 403: 398: 396: 393: 391: 390: 385: 384: 381: 377: 373: 372: 369: 368: 364: 363: 359: 355: 351: 345: 342: 341: 338: 321: 317: 313: 312: 304: 293: 291: 288: 284: 283: 279: 273: 270: 267: 263: 250: 249: 239: 235: 234: 230: 224: 221: 220: 217: 200: 196: 192: 191: 186: 183: 179: 178: 174: 170: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1373:— Preceding 1333: 1326: 1308: 1304: 1285: 1282: 1199: 1101:Knowledge's 1089: 1056:— Preceding 1045: 1041: 1032: 1008: 998: 939: 936:hubpages.com 935: 914:— Preceding 911: 862: 817: 813: 811: 806: 804: 801: 798: 795: 784:edit request 754:190.97.118.2 748:— Preceding 743: 725: 678: 672: 669: 652: 638: 635: 632: 629: 626: 623: 601: 585: 569: 538: 480:|Companies}} 466: 465: 452: 451: 439: 438: 426: 425: 413: 412: 400: 399: 387: 386: 349: 309: 246: 199:project page 188: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 1436:Cyphoidbomb 1402:Gwatson2016 1379:Gwatson2016 1345:Cyphoidbomb 1335:Invader Zim 1268:Cyphoidbomb 1239:Cyphoidbomb 1196:Cyphoidbomb 1170:Cyphoidbomb 1136:Cyphoidbomb 1114:Cyphoidbomb 1029:Cyphoidbomb 1014:Cyphoidbomb 850:Cyphoidbomb 579:Rox Robbins 30:Start-class 1455:Categories 1288:RoseWrites 1232:RoseWrites 1205:RoseWrites 1140:RoseWrites 1086:RoseWrites 1062:RoseWrites 1005:RoseWrites 977:CorporateM 658:mroconnell 641:mroconnell 1329:this edit 1103:BRD cycle 1033:Structure 1001:this edit 325:Companies 316:companies 272:Companies 169:Computing 1387:contribs 1375:unsigned 1200:maintain 1070:contribs 1058:unsigned 940:{domain} 916:unsigned 750:unsigned 733:Flowanda 707:Flowanda 605:contribs 589:contribs 573:contribs 482:template 441:Maintain 415:Copyedit 204:Websites 195:websites 164:Websites 112:Internet 103:Internet 59:Internet 899:CaptRik 679:nothing 496:Answer 428:Infobox 352:on the 139:on the 1406:WP:BRD 1306:Page. 963:TRPoD 945:TRPoD 689:Cazort 595:Eugbug 549:, and 478:portal 402:Assess 36:scale. 1046:whole 1009:their 782:This 729:WP:RS 467:Other 454:Stubs 1440:talk 1423:here 1421:and 1419:here 1383:talk 1349:talk 1341:WP:V 1314:talk 1292:talk 1243:talk 1209:talk 1174:talk 1144:talk 1118:talk 1066:talk 1018:talk 981:Talk 924:talk 903:talk 869:talk 854:talk 823:talk 758:talk 737:Talk 711:Talk 703:here 693:talk 670:--- 662:talk 645:talk 599:talk 583:talk 567:talk 557:Kuru 1327:In 1194:Hi 1134:Hi 1084:Hi 1042:not 999:In 942:-- 837:DES 807:700 687:. 609:not 344:Low 223:??? 131:Low 1457:: 1442:) 1389:) 1385:• 1351:) 1316:) 1294:) 1245:) 1211:) 1176:) 1146:) 1120:) 1072:) 1068:• 1020:) 983:) 926:) 905:) 871:) 856:) 825:) 760:) 735:| 731:. 709:| 705:. 695:) 664:) 647:) 559:. 553:. 545:, 491:}} 487:{{ 476:{{ 167:: 1438:( 1381:( 1347:( 1312:( 1290:( 1270:: 1266:@ 1241:( 1234:: 1230:@ 1207:( 1172:( 1142:( 1116:( 1064:( 1016:( 979:( 922:( 901:( 867:( 852:( 821:( 756:( 691:( 660:( 643:( 602:· 597:( 586:· 581:( 570:· 565:( 469:: 457:: 444:: 431:: 418:: 405:: 392:: 356:. 251:. 231:. 201:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Internet
WikiProject icon
icon
Internet portal
WikiProject Internet
Internet
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Websites
Computing
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Websites
websites
project page
???
importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Computing
WikiProject icon
Companies
WikiProject icon
Companies portal
WikiProject Companies
companies

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑