Talk:Hugo Chávez/Archive 19

1043:

contribution of a right-wing editor, I didnt claim most of Latin America was run by dictatorships, I did claim that most of democratic Latin America supports Chavez and is left-wing in leaning, of course there is always argument over what is democratic, in some people's eyes (such as possibly yourself) democracy is only when the right is in power, and whatever government the right has in power is a democracy, sorry to say this is not the case. I dont see how Chavez is anti-democratic, only the American and to an extent his own media presents him as such, his own media has been allowed to take political liberties against him (and continue!) to an extent that would be unheard of in the US, or the UK (which incidentally is where I come from), there is not much evidence to say that Chavez is anti-democratic, considering independant watchdogs have usually indicated his elections were freer than that of the first election of George Bush Jnr, and Chavez has a free medai which in the past has even been allowed to lauch a coup against him. Considering the fact that the US was happy to replace a fairly elected presidentwith someone who would most likely lead the country into an authoritarian dictatorship, and have done with numerous other leaders in similar circumstances in the past (see Pinochet), I really dont see how this article can take the view point that America is actually concerned about democracy in the region, looking at history and the present the mere idea seems laughable to be honest.

2724:

under Chavez’ time? Statistically you are more likely to be murdered or seriously assaulted on the streets of Caracas than you are as a prisoner in a US jail (sorry don’t have the footnote but just Google ‘violence, murder in Venezuela’ and you will get the drift). It is stated that ‘troops stormed Miraflores and freed Chavez’- crikey that is news to me and probably every Venezuelan who lived through it all- these pages are utter fantasy. Where is the detail of the peaceful opposition protest the day the coup took place where tens of people were gunned down in the street- never did the government investigate this. Why was Rincon bought back when he said Chavez resigned? Rincon never gave an account of this. You have to question the use of the ‘Cuban medical’ staff or Castro’s slaves- is this really Socialism where you send your people to foreign lands and pay them $ 20 a month? Frequent mentions are made of assassination attempts. I do not think it was reported here (I was falling asleep in the article) but it has been reported in the media that Chavez claimed a sniper tried to shoot him getting off a plan in Zulia and that the guy escaped across the border into Colombia- he was thought to have been an ex Zulia policeman. Now read that last sentence again and please ask yourself what have they been smoking! It's just the usual Castro stuff, each trying to out number the assasination attempts against them. The whole article is full of rubbish- a bit like the streets of Venezuela really.

2628:

political blueprint of new Venezuela. Simon Bolivar’s main goal was to unify the states of Venezuela, Colombia and Ecuador under one great “La Gran Colombia”. Furthermore, the unification would strengthen the states to be equal competitors with major continental powers. It would ultimately diminish the poverty stricken societies of Latin America. Simon Bolivar’s influence can be seen throughout Chavez’s platform in politics, economics, law, education, morality and duty. (1) Chavez places great emphasis on Bolivar being more than just a symbol or spirit of the Revolution but a concept that is still relevant in the current state of Venezuela. Similarities between these leaders start in their mixed race heritage. Bolivar’s mixed race “zambo” is often omitted in historical accounts. Chavez has been known to be proud of his indigenous and black roots. He has expressed that having indigenous blood means that his roots are the deepest and most authentic. (2) Moreover, their military leadership has shaped and continues to shape their commitment to protect and provide service to their nation. Both men can be considered to be the utmost patriotic figures.

2805:

independent) powers like juridical power (TSJ), electoral power (CNE, 4 out of 5 board members are Chavistas, supposed to be neutral and not elected by National Assembly, but appointed), created his own army (national police). So I'd say, these predictions are pretty correct, although Chavez doesn't have his re-election yet, wich was his first defeat in an election since he came to power and certainly unexpected for him. To get it now he even fails to uphold constitution and a Chavez-obedient CNE was pretty fast in helping him. Therefore the voter-registration will not be opened to register new voters (people that turned 18 between 27.11.2008, where the last election was held and 15.02.2009 when the referendum to his re-election will be held), although the constitution states clearly : you have to open the registry for 30 days for register process and after that 90 days closed before you can have any election or referendum. But all people here now, that with the crisis coming it will be too late for Chavez to ask for his re-election when money will be short in 4 months.--

982:

has erupted globabl controversy with supporters and opposition in all countries, including Venezuela itself. By putting the qualifer "the government of the United States" the editor is trying to influence the reader to believe that it is only political and/or economic interests that oppose Chavez. This is blatantly false. The majority of posters on Democratic Underground and Daily Kos see Chavez as anti-Democratic. The majority, if not the entirety of major leftwing publications view Chavez as anti-Democratic (the Economist is a center-left publication, btw). Cleary, in the United States at least, the unified consenus from the entire political spectrum view chavez as anti-democratic, and only an extreme left faction support Chavez. It is obviouse that it is not merely "the government" in the U.S. that opposes Chavez as the above editor attempts to portray. To find views supporting Chavez one as to look towards minor socialist zines and websites. Hopefully a more indepedent minded admin will revert this POV.

2979:

could say that anything you write on Venezuela will naturally have bias, which isn't necessarily bad. Since anti-semitism is often a judgment call, let's try and talk about facts instead. Clearly he has been quoted (see the articles) comparing Israel to Nazi-Germany. According to wikipedia's (see under the last bullet point of the section "forms"), and the US State Dept, this is considered "demonizing Israel" and is considered antisemitic. I feel through your argument that you are being very defensive, as if we're accusing you/ your country of being anti-Semitic, please understand we're not calling Venezuelans anti-Semitic, we're just stating the facts. I would also appreciate it if you would withdraw from this discussion, since you seem to be so personally affected.

704:

right (admittedly) that I have not been to Venezuela. However, I have studied this topic (in both English and Spanish) and I know for a fact that these elections have been watched closely, and have been deemed free by both the left and the right (except possibly some far-right wing groups, though it would be presumptious to assume that you are a far right winger). I would say Venezuela (from what I gather about it) is pretty fair, considering Chavez's own media is allowed to launch specific and derogotory attacks on him, and tried to initiate a coup against him, and still not being competely smashed after Chavez's return to power..... living in England I can tell you that the media here is not allowed to go out of its way to criticise the government at all, its

437:

call into question their beliefs and their application as a leader. Chavez's action are actually alot like Trotskyism, unlike other socialist ideologies Chavez did not think straight after he came to power that the revolution was over, he thinks of it as an ongoing struggle to strength the revolution and build socialism practically in this modern century. 21st Century Socialism and Bolivarianism is also alot like Trotskyism because it rejects the bureaucratic apparatus of the state as the driving force and instead holds a socialism 'from the ground up' grassroots populism to be the way to socialism. Chavez has clearly proven this with his local cooperatives and communes which have free health facilities and cheap food outlets.

3551:

Opposition and chavista bloggers share a few treats, one of them being a clearly identifiable political bias. As far as information in English is concerned, one could argue that opposition blogs are written by Venezuelan folks whereas chavista blogs, such as Venezuelanalysis, are written mostly by non-Venezuelans whose independence is compromised, such as Gregory Wilpert or Eva Golinger. However much these people are entitled to their opinions it is a mistake, a violation to Knowledge (XXG) principles and dishonest, let alone a disservice to readers, to present them as independent, trustworthy sources when factual evidence shows they are anything but. In fact, I will quote from JRSP

2507:"In 2005 and 2006 he was named one of Time magazine's 100 most influential people." SInce little oxygen is given in the lead to either domestic and international criticism of this highy controversial figure, it appears a bit puffy to privilege (by inclusion at the opening) the point that he made it into the top 100 most influential people, as a bald statement. In fact, influence of itself is no claim to moral virtue or good governance (Hitler would have made it into the top five in the 1940s); yet in the context, it's cleverly depicted as praiseworthy in this most unsatisfactory entree. 2294:

Chávez in Bagdhad, and openly calls for the end of the United Nations santions in Cuba. Not a single word of him about the human rights question or the curds in Iraq. He can be seen as a dubious politician, he openly fights what he sees as American imperialism, and doesn't have any problem in having good relashionships with ruthless dictators. He doesn't also criticizes other sorts of imperialism, like the Chinese and the Russian. The current article makes us understand better his reactions thowards Iraq War.

3592:

a pro-Chavez one. As you have rightly stated SandyGeorgia, there are plenty of truly independent, reputable and professional sources to quote from and use nowadays, starting from main media organizations to Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International. Hence re-writing the article, reflecting a close resemblance to reality, should not be difficult at all, and those editors who meet this proposition with resistance must either come out of the closet and state their interests or refrain from editing these pages.

3410:

bias , but Venezuelanalysis can because they translate news from Panorama? Is that the best you can do to defend your clearly untenable position? It matters a great deal where the funds come from, in fact that is one of the overarching arguments that those on your side use to wholesale disqualification of opposing opinions. Again this is an encyclopedia that's aiming at objectivity, neutrality, reliability of sources and so on, mind you do I need to copy here what those Wiki-principles are?

3136:

other / the Arab world. Also, I'd claim criticism of Israel is anti-semitism, while criticism of its policies are not. However, it is accepted that the "demonization" of Israel is anti-semitism. Demonization would be like if you were to say something like- Israel is the only country that could get away with massacring a whole country with no repercussions... etc." This is because Israel has killed ~ 1000 Palestinians while targeting military targets, and conflicts like in

3750:

reputation, each particular report is written by particular people based on particular sources, and needs to be judged on its merits, even if the initial presumption is that it's good. Example: you buy bread from the supermarket assuming it isn't mouldy, but if at home your wife starts eating it and says it's mouldy, you don't say "impossible, they've never sold us mouldy bread before!". No, you look, smell, and judge on the merits. And if necessary, send it back.

1117:

pending. I think this implies that he was pursuing a Phd, for which a thesis would be necessary, (otherwise it wouldn't be stated in his biographie that his thesis is still pending), but since it isn't necessary to do a thesis for a masters degree, he did in fact obtain a masters degree in political science as cited on note 8 which a link to a venezuelan goverment website. In conclusion, someone miscited reference number 8 in saying that he left without a degree.

1058:

since the late 50's, if I'm not mistaken. I have a lot of friends from there. Also, true, the CIA backed pinochet, but becuase he was bringing soviets into chile. you have to be honest when making statements about history. Not to defend US policy, but that's how things were during the cold war. US has always supported democracy in the whole world. that is not something to laugh at. methods can be debated, however. Motive is another 20 dollars, as they say.

31: 3415:

refuse to see the merits of providing the whole picture so that interested parties can make their own minds. Martin Sanchez is an employee of Chavez. Gregory Wilpert is married to an employee of Chavez and the site he edits receives funding from the Chavez regime. Under such circumstances you can not argue that they are independent sources, and I won't insult people's intelligence by explaining what is and isn't an independent source.

4321:(Edición 2261 - Lunes 8 de Enero de 2007 - Edición Impresa) Original quote in Spanish: "«El Estado soy yo» fue lo único que le faltó decir ayer a Hugo Chávez para equipararse al «Rey Sol», el monarca francés que resumió como ninguno el absolutismo en la segunda mitad del siglo XVII y principios del XVIII. El gobierno que inaugurará mañana marcará una concentración del poder sin precedentes en Venezuela..." 2875:

concerning a controversial issue." And from "I'm feeling Lucky" on "venezuelan antisemitism" comes "Recently, in a series of public statements on Israel's war with Hezbollah, Chavez repeatedly compared Israel to the Nazis and Hitler..." If you require more proof, or a persuasive style essay, I'll be glad to work one up- I just want to see this valid criticism of Chavez in print on wikipedia.

3662:. As per the 'controversy' there wasn't such a thing, just a silly attempt by some apologists of Chavez, some of them like Gregory Wilpert with huge conflicts of interests, to refute reality. Human Rights Watch, which serious people considered a highly reputed organization, concluded that Wilpert's et al letter was nothing more than baseless allegations disseminated by unhelpful critics 1961:. If it would be presented as a fact than that would mean that "the us being an imperialist country" would also be presented as fact. That's of course a matter of debate itself. If you want it included it should read "he claims to promote anti-imperialism" and not "he promotes anti-imperialism", but leaving it out completely is probably the best for this controversial topic. 3809:(@ alekboyd) Quite. Stop moaning about a particular source in general (moaning which can be done about any source, and which for VA I think (Alekboyd) you're exaggerating in terms of importance and in terms of evidence for your claims) and start trying to show inaccuracy. The former just fills up talk pages, the latter we can do something about to improve the article. 759:

US government' unless someone comes up with something better. Seeing as I have a somewhat ridiculous 2-1 consensus in my favour (as one user cant take this project seriously and ;lodge specific and meaningful criticism). believe the source supports my change, and that the source did not give a specific reason for supporting the previous statement (what democracy

2674:"bolivarianism" really should be. It also should be noted that, despite Hugo Chávez claims to be a devout Catholic, that the Catholic Church exists in a clandestine way in China, except in Macao and Hong Kong, two paradises of neoliberal capitalism. Despite all this, Chávez is a keen supporter of China's authoritarian, anti-democratic and imperialist regimen. 3921:, start an article about them (it'll be interesting to see if your various claims can be sourced to a sufficient standard for inclusion in WP; some obviously yes, some maybe not). Then you can edit each VA ref to point to that article. Second, pick the most egregiously erroneous statement sourced to VA that you can find and bring it here for discussion. 1998:"Chavez Says Merkel a Political Descendant of Hitler The German government has shrugged off a verbal attack on Chancellor Angela Merkel by Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez who called her a political descendant of Adolf Hitler and stopped just short of telling her to go to hell. The two leaders might meet at an upcoming summit in Peru. " 3375:. My experience with Venezuelanalysis is that when they speak about facts, the info can be verified; they might have their bias but they don't lie. If the information provided by venezuelanalysis is reliable and they have editorial independence, it doesn't matter where they funds come from. Furthermore, many articles from Maracaibo's 2782:, predicted that Venezuela under Chavez in 2007 would have a "nationalized economy, out-of-control spending, government by decree, and perpetual re-election." The motion which included the provision to allow indefinite presidential re-election was voted down in national referendum in 2007. The daily also compared Chavez to King 1913:, he says "They're trying to sabotage the Olympics in Beijing, and behind that is the hand of imperialism." As wikipedia editors we are not here to judge if Chávez discourse is sincere or not, or what is anti-imperialism or what is not. But multiple reliable sources support his promotion of anti-imperialism, whatever that means. 1775:

article places the words "us imperialism" between quotations and as you can read further you can see that washington calls Chavez an imperialist even. I'm not representing my opinion that he's not an anti-imperialist, but his opponents would obviously not see him that way so it's a relative term and thus best to avoid.

1641:

this entire article and not realize that the fundamental problem in Venezuela is that the poor are easily and readily polarized and Chavéz pushed for change at the cost of the media-controlling wealthy class). Basically, I think we should work to bring the english document in line with the spanish language one.

582:

strange that this can be legitimate criticism A: that Chavez is democratically elected and has brought back democratic elections which were not there previously B: 'threat to democracy in Latin America', seriously Im a bit wtf (pardon my language), how can Chavez be a threat to democracy in Latin America when it

3761:

However the ACHR issue is one that should probably be followed up. From what I've seen it does seem a problem, arising ultimately from a political interference with the legal system back in 2003 (which in general is far too common in Latin America, as it was in pre-1999 Venezuela). Though the Supreme

3179:

strongly condemned antisemitc statements by the President of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez Frías, who had said that “the world has wealth for all, but some minorities, the descendants of the same people that crucified Christ, have taken over all the wealth of the world”. Chávez made this statements during a

3135:

Israel isn't going into cities, and shooting everyone in the head. This is what Nazis did. Israel is trying to do a Regime change, and the current regime just likes using human shields (war crime) so as to gain sympathy with the media, which neglects to show what the Palestinians are saying to each

3106:

The criticism section is poor, but that just reflects the poverty of the criticism article, and improving that should probably be the starting point. My "Discuss" remark quoted a three-part sentence from you which included a number of logical flaws; your inability to read languages other than English

2723:

I check the footnotes on some of the topics, knowing the footnote cannot possibly support what has been stated and low and behold it does not. There is no balance to this, it is simply awful. Some of the subjects which come to mind are: Why has there been no mention of the tripling of the murder rate

2673:

I think it also should be pointed that, unlike Simón Bolívar, Hugo Chávez is not an integral anti-imperialist and anti-colonialist, because he totally supports chinese imperialism in Tibet and denied the right to self-determination and independence of Tibet last year, in a way totally opposed to what

2571:

Since this article has far more serious issues than incorrectly formatted dates, while I appreciate that you caught it on your date tour, it's hardly worth focusing on the dates when the article should have a multiple issues tag and badly needs a complete rewrite, resourcing, balancing, updating, and

2534:

policy for years. Not only is it thoroughly POV and unbalanced, and riddled with prose and MoS errors, it's also outdated and overly long, still using largely text that was written in 2005, well before many documented Chavez incidents. I don't expect any improvement until Wikipedians decide to take

2293:

Maybe the word "friendship" is excessive, but he really was the first western Head of State to visit Saddam Hussein, in 2000, after Golf War, which drew criticism from then American administration. The current article shows his good relashionship with Saddam Hussein, saying that he himself drove Hugo

2207:

No because a section on public opinion isn't relevant. I don't think other presidents of the world have a 'public opinion' section on Knowledge (XXG) so why should he. We should let what has happened do the talking. Knowledge (XXG) is suppose to let people come to a concise and well informed decision

803:

Also (this is a bit off topic but Im replying to an above comment), if your worried about offending our leftist sensibilities, maybe you should check out the wikipedia articles on the middle east, islam, islamophobia, and all those wacky obscurist nationalist groups in the middle east that have their

737:

I dont mean supported by America and its Munroe doctrine, I mean actually democratic with free elections. If you cannot give me an example I assume I am correct in believing the statement is a logical fallacy, and ill change it to what I proposed (unless someone can come up with something better). As

3591:

Therefore, using JRSP's own argument, which is impossible to disagree with, same criteria must be applied to sources that have strong ties and are funded by the Chavez government. Knowledge (XXG) is not meant to be an anti-Chavez encyclopedia, likewise I reckon we could all agree that it must not be

3409:

So let me see if I can get this straight JRSP: when I speak about facts that can be cross checked and verified, that are not lies, such as Chavez's stake in Smartmatic, Maisanta list, VIO, Venezuelanalysis, Gregory Wilpert, Eva Golinger, conflict of interests, etc., I can not be quoted because of my

2978:

to JRSP, Any article I read will be in English, and therefore will come from US/UK, which means the organizations will have strong ties to the US. There are absolutely enough sources on the topic for it to exist, and if you don't see the issue, you're probably too close. Since you're Venezuelan, I

2848:

Your links' actual evidence seems to be mostly criticism of Israel, some dodgy cartoons, and talking to people Israel doesn't like (a dislike that may be reasonable) in a realpolitik motivated mostly by the desire to strengthen OPEC. There may still be actual anti-semitism in Venezuela, sadly, but I

2745:

What is actually stated, if you cut and paste, is that 'Venezuelan soldiers loyal to Chávez...later stormed and retook the presidential palace". They were the Presidential Guard, and you can watch them do just this 34 minutes into John Pilger's 'The War on Democracy'. However, again according to the

1683:

There was an unsubstantiated declaration of Chavez as an "authoritarian socialist" in the intro. Although the nation's elections have been criticized by Chavez's opponents, he certainly hasn't shown any indication of outright authoritarianism. That's a heavy word. Joseph Stalin was an authoritarian

1640:

I'd like to see the presidential timeline simplified into 3 segments, with shorter excepts from the sub-pages. And more detail about his role in south american relations, early changes and drafting of the constitution, and the all-important demographic lines of "the popular movement" (you could read

1399:

One message from February 2008 allegedly mentioned US$ 300 million in Venezuelan support for FARC. The Colombian national police did not note, however, whether Venezuela actually delivered these funds to the rebels. Another document found on Reyes's laptop appears to contain a 1992 message from Hugo

1216:

According to this Reuters article, during a state-of-the-nation address on Friday Jan. 11, 2008 Chavez once again brought up the idea of eliminating the constitutional provision on term-limits to his presidency and allowing him to run for re-election indefinitely-- despite a previous attempt failing

1057:

two issues (effort to keep to the point) Someone early on top of this page has suggested that chavez brough back democracy in venezuela. that is only correct if you are willing to admit that it was chavez himself who tried to put out democracy in the early nineties. Venezuela has been a democracy

758:

Im giving you guys a day to come up with the awnsers to my questions, If there arent any awnsers Ill assume I am correct in believing the statement in question was a logical fallacy, I propose changing the sentence to 'Some believe Chavez's policies to be contrary to democracy, including the present

681:

Idiot! The elections were fixed beyond all proportion. You're just plain wrong. WRONG. grrr. Have you even been to Venezuela? No, probably not. The contention that Chavez is a threat to democracy is correct and substantiated. To leave it out of the article would be biased in favor of this dictator.

590:

has been the main threat to Latin American democratically elected governments (watch 'The war on democracy' despite its title and obviously set opinion, it provides factually udisputable evidence) , and where it does exist it is universally left-wing and therefore universally supported by Chavez. As

546:

I noticed that there is no outward link to the "Criticism of Hugo Chávez" topic, although there is a link from that topic to this. Is merely linking to criticism considered a breach of NPOV? The tone of this topic edges over into hagiography already, and placing all the criticism in a separate topic

3495:

Setting aside the obvious bias in the sources used in this article when it was written years ago (clearly VenAnalysis is a highly partisan source as are several of the other authors mentioned), the entire article needs to be updated, trimmed and revamped to reflect current reliable sources and give

2627:

Hugo Chavez, the current president of the democratic socialist state of Venezuela adopted ideologies of many significant historical leaders of the world. The Latin American military leader named Simon Bolivar has been his main inspiration. “El Libertador”, inspired Chavez’s integral approach to the

2481:

This claim, in the second sentence, is referenced by an article by a Western journalist. The closest thing I can find to a supporting statement is "The Venezuelan leader went on to launch a defense of the sort of democratic socialism practiced in his country where, despite the success of a group of

2228:

He was friends with Saddam Hussein, like he is now with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. There are any sources were he praised this dictators ? I remember he visited Iraq in 1999 and probably his great problem with Iraq War, was because of his agreements with Saddam Hussein. He calls Bush the Devil and says he

1042:

I was the priginal editor here, I lost my account password---again!, and I cant be bothered to make a new account because getting anything doen on wikipedia is a nightmare, I didnt make any edits in the end, because I could see there would be problems, I just left it, so your actually attacking the

901:

What?, you mean Chavez supports democracy?, seriously i dont know what you mean when you say there is little democracy outside venezuela when most goverments such as brazil, colombia, argentina and chile have democratic systems. Chavez does seem to be a threat, he supports and admires Fidel Castro,

810:

Okay Ive waited a day since my original reply to the crticism I recieved, theere havent been any ansers to the questions I asked (in the big paragraph) yet, therefore ill log into my account and make the change I proposed (if I can retrieve my password...), you can remove it if you provide a reason

609:

the change you propose. The entire topic seems to have been thoroughly vetted so as not to offend the delicate sensibilities of the leftist Knowledge (XXG) reader community; so much so that it reads like a Hugo Chavez puff piece. So why not make the change? It will make this topic even sillier. (At

595:

to oppose Chavez because they view him as a threat to Latin American democracy (although, what democracy? its ruled by the Munroe doctrine) however the sentence quoted shouldnt be placed in the first paragraph, as to me at least it is a logical fallacy, it should be rephrased and put in a criticism

317:

Well there were several news stories about FBI and CIA systematically editing Knowledge (XXG), and seeing as how this article features so many Economist sources, and we all know what that journal advocates, I assumed this was the approved edit. I'd rather post my outrage here than just edit eithout

3500:

to all issues. It remains-- as it has since it was written-- an unbalanced, one-sided, outdated account for all of the reasons well discussed many times in archives. Attempts to update, trim and give due weight to reliable sources in the article are met with resistance. The only change that was

3119:

C'mon! When a nation, such as Israel, carries out a program of ethnic cleansing, then comparisons to the Nazis seem reasonable. It can be argued that Israel's treatment of its Palestinian minority amounts to ethnic cleansing. It's funny; anti-Semitism is a disease of totalitarianism and the Right,

981:

Doubtfully this will receive attention anytime soon. So to address the sentence: "Some people, especially in the government of the United States, view Chávez as a threat to democracy in Latin America.". This is blatant POV pushing. First, i see no reason to single out the United States. Chavez

958:

You have a very revisionist view not only of history, but contemporary events as well. Nobody would claim that most of latin America is dictatorships. You created a figment imagination that support your own worldview, because reality does not. Thus, your opinion of the wording in this article is

886:

Well ive made a new account, I waited rather longer than I said I would, the change that I proposed is in the text and Ill be changing it to such a I havent heard any specific criticism of what I jave written. I have spelling and grammar issues so if you notice anything in what I have written feel

703:

I assume you meant to paste that in the section above, in response to what I wrote, please refrain from referring to me as an idiot, I do not think of myself as an idiot (I have a high IQ anyway...), however maybe I am... (my spelling suggests so =P) but it is not really for you to say so, you are

476:

Stalin or Fidel Castro? Since when did Stalin or Fidel Castro permit a media to be in existence that actively supported coups and attempts on the leaders life? In most western countries this is not allowed, it is strange in such an autocracy that Hugo Chavez permits (grudingly, admittedly) a media

3201:

This article uses Venezuelanalysis.com extensively, which is a clear violation to NPOV and RS. Venezuelanalysis has received funding from the Chavez government, its founder (Martin Sanchez) is Chavez's Consul in Chicago and its editor (Gregory Wilpert) is married to Chavez's Consul in NY, ergo as

3078:

Regardless, the criticism section is horribly worded and shows a command of English worse than a second grader. I'm usually pretty meek, but if there is no resolution here, I may have to be bold. And to discuss my not being able to read another foreign language- I'm American, which should pretty

2318:

I updated the economic charts with 2006 information (2007 information is not yet available). If you click on the graph, it will go to the page for that png image, which contains a link to the XLS file that I used in 2006. However, for some reason, Knowledge (XXG) doesn't allow me to upload an XLS

1595:

Under 'January 2007–present', second paragraph from the bottom it says 'At the same time the Venezuelan Government was also reported by BBC to be suing CNN'. Is this at the same time as noted in the paragraph below, which reports the same thing but in November 2007? And is the last paragraph even

581:

Im a bit miffed about the statment 'Some foreign governments, especially the government of the United States, view Chávez as a threat to democracy in the region', I dont have a problem with this as it is sourced, and that this is an excuse that the USA often use to denounce him, however I find it

436:

Well how much more can he do other than claim to be a Trot, I mean what would you accept as evidence in his actions that he is a Trot? If this is you're logic then every politician in the world really could be called a 'self-declared conservative' or a 'self-declared socialist' because anyone can

388:

So I guess that Hitler winning elections and referendums without opposition makes him a "democratic leader", what about Stalin's opposition, I haven't seen opposing parties in his ballot boxes. The opposition withdrew BECAUSE Chavez is undemocratic, it is foolish to say that he is a democrat just

3414:

It is not for you to decide which source is trustworthy and which one it isn't, for then Knowledge (XXG) will become just a propaganda outlet like Aporrea or Venezuelanalysis. If these sources are to be used, they need to be clearly identified. As stated elsewhere I don't see why you just flatly

3017:

I don't believe that JRSP should withdraw. If one believes certain people act like Nazis, it's only logical for one to compare them to Nazis. It has nothing to do with prejudice against or hostility toward Jews; it applies to everyone. If the US State Department wants to come out with ridiculous

2154:

We need to update the inflation numbers since 2005. The Economist sites inflation in Venezuela as now being over 30% a year (over 26% a year is technically hyperinflation). This undermines is socialist platform and makes the poorest Venezuelans worse off... its pretty key to his presidency and

939:

Almost all of latin America is now democratised, after a long systematic fight of Soviet inspired instigation, the forces supported by the U.S. were victorious and now democratic. Say what you want by the means to achieve those ends. Most of latin America supports neo-liberal politics and have

3749:

My views are not the issue, the facts are. Fact is HRW have chosen not to engage with a serious criticism (the detailed response to their initial reply). If this does not damage their reputation in your eyes perhaps you ought to reexamine your own partiality. Furthermore, whatever their overall

3249:

of the article, which is the current one at time of writing.) Most of them are (I think) from the VA 'news' section rather than 'opinion/analysis'. As to NPOV violation of venezuelanalysis: er, no. Yes it clearly has a selectivity and POV (which I make "sympathetic but mildly critical"), but on

1355:

Citation There is a request for a citation under Early Life, the sentence can be sourced to The Observer, May 7th 2006, The new kid in the barrio. I do not seem to be able to put this in the article, or know how. Please include if possible. There is a link I found on the internet to the article

1217:

back in Dec 2007. Although his second and final term is set to end in 2013, Chavez suggested holding a recall vote against himself in 2010, the earliest possible date, and "add a question in the referendum to also determine if Venezuelans want to give him the right of 'indefinite re-election.'"

366:

Find evidence of a stolen election if you want to make an accusation of that. I saw a landslide in his favor. Also, the opposition dropped out, he did nothing impacting their foolish decision. Claiming that he cheated because he has no opposition is like fighting the fur industry by buying a

2804:

Well, Chavez ruled by decree until mid 2008, he nationalized more Industry (Cement, electricity, phone company etc) and he calls again for a change in the constitution to have his re-election in 2012. It is also quite obvious here (i'm living in Venezuela), that he controls all (supposed to be

2029:

Marxism, whereas Hugo Chavez's policies ARE inspired by Marxism, and he doesn't fit into this category. I think you would insult many people by calling Hugo Chavez a "democratic socialist", I mean, he talks about the 'socialist revolution' and the "Empire" just as much as any "communist" does.

2028:

Secondly, it should say "socialism", rather than "democratic socialism". Simply not putting democratic beforehand is not saying that it isn't democratic, and besides, the Soviet Union considered itself a democracy. An example of democratic socialism is Sweden, and it's completely separate from

1801:

anti-imperialism not that he is an anti-imperialist. Multiple reliable sources support that he promotes this, and yes, this refers to what he says, we are not here to judge if this is true or not; the same thing applies to socialism, integration or whatever. True or false, the anti-imperialist

1774:

Just because he calls himself an "anti-imperialist" doesn't make him one. What's an imperialist? If he doesn't even support freedom for tibetans you can't just represent him as an "anti-imperialist" because others would argue that china's "occupation" of tibet is a form of imperialism. The BBC

1116:

On the introduction of Hugo Chavez it is said that he studied political science at the graduate level without obtaining a degree and it cites note number 8 as reference, but when note number 8 is read (text is in spanish), it clearly states that he obtained a masters degree but with his thesis

782:

One last thing, mainly just an inquisititive note as it is a matter of POV, why is America worried about lack of democracy in Latin America, when has it supported Latin American democracy over the Munroe doctrine? When has it supported Latin American democracy full stop? When has it supported

3822:

Change Israel and/or United states with Chavez and/or his regime. I am merely referring to Knowledge (XXG) principles, the same ones you so readily apply to sources that undermine your simplistic and revisionist view of contemporary politics in Venezuela. Again, if you have issues with those

3550:

SandyGeorgia I must say that I concur wholeheartedly with your argument. Years ago there weren't enough English sources of information about Venezuela. That prompted people from all sides of the political divide to start reporting what was happening, however almost none were/are journalists.

929:

First, you are using the term Monroe Doctrine wrong. It was a doctrine of keeping European powers out of the western hemisphere. Not controlling latin American countries. I suppose if you want to push that that is the policy of the U.S. you could use an extension of Manifest Destiny or some

3268:

As to VA's funding, it says it's supported by grassroots groups such as the "Fundación para la Justicia Económica Global". There is no evidence that Sanchez is/was a Consul (even if he was the founder), and Wilpert, an academic, is one of 6 principal contributors to VA, so his marriage to a

2874:

for proper definitions of anti-semitism. I quote: "The demonization of Israel, or vilification of Israeli leaders, sometimes through comparisons with Nazi leaders, and through the use of Nazi symbols to caricature them, indicates an anti-Semitic bias rather than a valid criticism of policy

2024:

First off, what is known as "neo-liberalism", at least as he uses it, is basically the dominant force in the western world, and he uses it to describe conservatives as well as liberal people. This is something that members of the "socialist revolution" believe in but not many other people.

3292:. However I have not been able to find evidence from Venezuela's Official Registry (Gaceta Oficial) on Martin Sanchez initial designation as Chavez's Consul in Chicago. I wouldn't want to think that he violated both Venezuelan and American legistation. Perhaps JRSP can clarify the point. 3625:

source has a POV, be it the anonymous AP reporters or Chicago Tribune editorialists, etc. Sometimes it's more obvious, sometimes less. Best we can do is try to back up facts from multiple sources, the best sources we can manage; if necessary clarifying disagreement without taking sides

389:

BECAUSE he showed up for an uncontested election. Unfortunately for the international community wining elections (even uncontested) is enough to be called a democrat, nobody cares if the person in question actually governs as a democrat, and alas Knowledge (XXG) does the same....

4305:(Edición 2264 - Jueves 11 de Enero de 2007 - Edición Impresa) Original quote in Spanish: "No se sabe aún cómo será su socialismo del siglo XXI. Sí se sabe cómo será Venezuela en 2007: economía estatizada, gasto sin control, censura, gobierno por decreto y reelección perpetua." 3062:

which I think puts the issue in perspective. Also, the State Department definition is not very helpful. It distinguishes between "objective criticism of Israeli policies and anti-Semitism". Similarly, criticism of Chavez is not necessarily directed against Venezuelans.

1305:

states, "Venezuelan troops are cracking down on the smuggling of food... the National Guard has seized about 750 tons of food... Hugo Chavez ordered the military to keep people from smuggling scarce items like milk... He's also threatened to seize farms and milk plants..."

185:

Well, opinion articles are not necessarily off-limits for factual statements. This article is by a professor of Latin American studies and appeared in a respected journal, so it does have some weight behind it. I can understand the objection, but to say it black-and-white

763:

is right-wing? what democracy is not supported by Chavez in Latin America?). The source (short-bbc article, hardly authortative) however is not too vague to support my change, it shows that Chavez is criticised by some people as anti-democratic, but makes no sense with '

1395:

Following a March 1, 2008 Colombian raid on FARC headquarters inside Ecuador, in which FARC leader Raul Reyes and others were killed, Colombia's national police reported that documents recovered from Reyes's computer indicate financial ties between Hugo Chavez and the

465:

The difference here is that most "conservatives" or "socialists" dont claim to be anything, just do their works and thats all. Also, lot of people could relate Chavez´s bureaucritic policies and control over the justice system more to those of Stalin or Fidel Castro.

2443:

There was an unholy mixture of US and international date formats. Which is it to be? During the audit, I chose US, since there seemed to be slightly more of them. Buzz me if you want them clicked back again. At least our readers see consistency in the main text now.

304:

Agree with both Eleland's popinbts. were the CIA or any opposition group to try to influence the article there are many ways they could do so (as a project we are vulnerable to POV pushers of any ilk) but a silly piece of vandlaism is not one of them. Thanks,

742:

democracies in South America, and since the only demorcacies there are left-wing (as far as I know) he is not anti-democracy in the region. Also my question that: If Chavez is anti-democratic why did he liberalise Venezuela and its media? still has not been

1101:

The error is found under the heading "2003-2004 recall Vote." the mistake itself is "The Colombians were outfit in Venezuelan military uniforms..." The word "outfit" should be in past tense (outfitted). Someone who is authorized please fix this. Thank you.

2208:

about people on their acts, a section on 'public opinion' would contradict this as it would be inadvertently telling people how to feel about him. We shouldn't be telling people how others feel about him, we should be helping them feel their own thing. --

1910:. I don't think heritage.org or anarkismo.net count as "sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". Anti-imperialism is a recurring theme in HC's discourse and it is important enough to be mentioned in lead. Even in the USA Today article 1729:"Chávez promotes a political doctrine of democratic socialism, Latin American integration, and anti-imperialism." "Anti emperialism" goes way too far. For example Chávez calls kosov's prime minister a terrorist and refuses to recognize its independence 3716:

You can cite as many replies from Chavez's apologists as you like, Human Rights Watch's track record, reputation, credibility, objectivity and impartiality are beyond question, and certainly not tainted, as that of Gregory Wilpert and other unhelpful

3621:? The one with the controversy about their recent Venezuela report, for instance? Nice example. ... I'd put more faith in what AI has to say, but then I'm a member... Anyway, as has been said, on political issues like this, especially for Venezuela, 1212:

This is my first time suggesting a change to wikipedia, and I'm not sure how to do it, but I thought I'd mention this article I came across today, and how it's not in Chavez's main wiki entry. www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSN1131818720080111

627:, not opinion. I'm sorry that your opinion isn't reflected in reliable sources, and I don't support editorializing or removing reliably sourced content. In fact, if there's any problem with that statement, it could be the sole mention of the US. 2486:

the support for the claim I was looking for. It's a second-hand reference, anyway, through the Taiwan Times website, not the original Observer. The spelling isn't British; I wonder what else has been changed without our own readers' knowing

2552:

OK, I hesitate to change it to European format until the guideline for non-anglophone-country-related articles is resolved at MOSNUM, unless other editors here are keen for a prompt change. I hope for resolution at MOSNUM within a week ...

1197:

from this article. For one thing, that category's supercats make it clear that it means "Native Americans" in the sense of people indigenous to what is now the U.S. Also, the article does not substantiate that Huguo Chávez is an indigenous

1880:

and Chávez supported China on this. So there's one camp which claims that Chávez promotes anti-imperialism, and another that he doesn't and instead that he even promotes imperialism. That's why the controversial phrase should be left out.

1828:

That's what you find maybe. "Promoting" would mean that all his policies are factual examples of anti-imperialism and they're not. If you want it in it should read like "self-aclaimed anti-imperialist" instead of presenting it as fact.

498:, theres no one talking about his media polices, which by the way even if he permits so, he has demostrated he has the power to override and discard media anytime he wants, wich is not precisely a demostration of free speech.----sabin 2631:

1) Boudin, Chesa (2006) Venezuelan Revolution – 100 Questions, 100 Answers, New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press, p 7-8. 2) Guevara, Aleida(2005) Chavez,Venezuela & The New Latin America, Melbourne, Australia: Ocean Press, p 18-19.

1478:

Venezuelanalysis has both news and opinion pieces, so you have to look at the actual source. In this case it is a professor of political science at cornell who has written several books on the subject, so I don't see the problem.

1873:

I haven't seen any reliable sources that said so. Only that he himself, or his fans, claim so. The bbc article says that "Venezuela is being accused of being an imperialist country" and there's others who accuse him of being an

1229:

after determining that said material was off-topic as far as Code Pink was concerned. An editor identified the material as being more appropriate on this article. If you're interested, here's the diff where we removed it:

2333:

Does anyone have access to Venezuela government statistics? For some reason, the WDI doesn't have any unemployment figures after 2003, and I vaguely recall that people didn't want me to use the CIA World Factbook figures.

472:

Im not saying he is not a Trotskyst, and that is not what I´m discussing. But there is no valid reference, and without any more deep source, Knowledge (XXG) should leave it open for the reader to decide it.------ sabin

3501:

allowed several years ago was cutting criticism to a POV fork, and as soon as the criticism was cut, work stopped. The question is not which information from Venanlysis is dubious, but why the article doesn't reflect

2250:

The purpose of a Knowledge (XXG) talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal

264:

Chill out, it was simple vandalism and has been reverted. Much more likely to have been a bored kid than a CIA officer. In future you can fix it yourself, rather than declaring your outrage on the article talk page.

708:

to remain impartial, in fact the BBC was prosecuted for not being impartial, so please dont give me a lecture about liberty of the media. My point was this, to me the statement that 'Chavez is viewed as a threat to

2482:

right wingers who overthrew him for 48 hours and proclaimed a dictatorship in 2002." Apart from the fact that the journalist's sentence is horribly ungrammatical and hard to make sense of for that reason, it's not

870:

I understand the main idea of the paragraph is synthesising that HC is a controversial figure: some people & governments (specially the US gov) don't like him while some others do. What changes do you suggest?

1164:

In fact, Venezuelan higher education system officially uses the word "Thesis" only for doctoral dissertations. However, undergraduate degrees and master degrees usually require some research work, normally called

1750:

Would you explain why an anti-imperialist should support Kosovo and the Dalai Lama? I don't see the contradiction. Chávez often mention in his speeches he is against imperialism, BBC says he fights US imperialism

1008:

Ok guys, i see you "democratic people" need a little help to stop writing stupidities. Understand this : In the world, there's as many people thinking USA are a threat to democracy than people thinking chavez is

3244:

You need to search in the wikitext to find them all. I make it no 26 (Ellner 2005) and 199 (the RCTV you found), plus 115, 133, 157, 174, 204, 207, 208: a total of 9 from 226 references. (Addendum: based on

1502:

says link can't be used". Actually, the guideline says "No page should be linked from a Knowledge (XXG) article unless its inclusion is justified", so I'd ask why this particular link should be included.

2623:

I am working on a group project and would like to add some material found in my research. As this page is semi-protected I am unable to. I ask for cooperation as I am a newbie to this world of wikipedia.

1326:

It has nothing to do with "military policy," and more importantly the article has been very selectively edited to give the impression that Chavez is enforcing a rationing policy, rather than regulations

3230:

Correct me if I'm wrong but I could only find one reference to Venezuelanalysis.com, supporting the statement "RCTV is still broadcasting via cable and satellite and is widely viewable in Venezuela".

2746:

same film, Chavez was not freed from Miraflores, because he was not in Miraflores, but was helicoptered (a verb one doesn't get to use enough) in from wherever he had been taken by his kidnappers.

2185:

Maybe I missed it, but I really didn't see much about the public's opinion of him. Not the international community, but the people of his country. Would some please create a section about this?

725:

makes no sense, the source used (BBC) only vaguely points to criticism and itself does not elaborate, I view the BBC a reputable as far as it goes, but it hardly gives any reason for its statment.

1953:

Again none of those sources say he's an anti-imperialist, only that he considers himself to be one. He's accusing pretty much the entire world of imperialism, while supporting (what some see as)

2091:. I don't understand your references to 'soviet inspired "comunism" ' or Fidel Castro or capitalism. Do you have some sources or is this just your personal view? Remember that WP does not allow 2504:

one of the most partisan, extremist and incompetent administrations ever to grace the White House is a critic of Chavez. But this is not at all the case. The lead appears very unbalanced to me.

1091:: anonymous users and new accounts can't edit it. You can wait a few days, request some administrator to remove protection or just say below what the mistake is and any "old" user can fix it. 854:, view Chávez as a threat to democracy in Latin America. Others sympathize with his ideology or welcome his bilateral trade and reciprocal aid agreements. In 2005 and 2006 he was named one of 170:

Only after polls showed that 60% of Venezuelans opposed the measure did Chavez add incentives such as reducing the workday from eight to six hours and lowering the voting age from 18 to 16.

613:

Do topics written like this tend to ruin the cred of the Knowledge (XXG) concept? I'm not sure. But in any case, the change you propose can't possibly make this topic worse, so go for it.

3120:

yet, Rightists always scream "anti-Semitism" when Israel is criticised. The supporters of the far-Right junta of George W were very good at this. And it seems that this hasn't changed.

2424:

This part deserves more development, since it's very controversial. He visited Saddam Hussein in Iraq, in 1999. It should be mencioned if he ever showed any criticism of his regimen.

2066:

and how it different than soviet inspired 'communism'. Hugo Chavez gets along very well with Fidel Castro, who is a 'communist'. Hugo Chavez has often spoken of capitalism as evil.

902:

who is a dictator and is against media that criticises him, furthermore lately he has been supporting FARC guerrilas in colombia and proposed to stop qualifying them as terrorists.

113:

While Hugo Chavez may have said that he is a trotskyist, his actions and policies don't really resemble trotskyism at all. I think he was probably just using it as another word for

596:

section. I do have a pro-Chavez opion I dont deny it, but I believe the points I have made are perfectly logical, and we all have opinions, even those who contst what I have said.

2365:, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 158:

Trotskyism is a form of socialism. I know nothing about it, but just because it is a socialist philosophy doesn't mean that Chavez is a faithful follower of it.-Jared Croft

2535:

notice, which I don't expect to happen. I'm glad you stopped by on your date delinking tour though Tony (by the way, they use international date formatting in Venezuels).

246:

This caudillo crap is beyond shameless.... Chavez is the democratically elected president of Venezuela, the very first sentence of this article shows the article's bias...

3256:) talks about challenges as well (towards the end). I havent' time go through them all. One VA interview I came across recently is quite interesting about the challenges: 462:

I could claim to be Superman, but that doesnt make me that guy. Nazi means "national socialist" and them claiming to be socialists don´t turn them automatically into so.

3647:

no government has ever expelled our representatives for our work, not even the right-wing dictatorships guilty of far more egregious abuses than those committed by Chávez

2229:

smells to sulphur, or "the greatest genocidal ever", but seems to forget that he was smelling roses when he visited Iraq in 1999 and never cared about the curds genocide.

529:

table, about a third of the way down the page, the percentages add up to 130 percent of the population? 59% voted no + 41% voted yes + 30% did not vote adds up to 130%

1021:

Bad evil chavez is against right-wing TV? But there's some in his country, while in the USA i don't heard about a leftist TV....(is there one in the whole NATO block?)

3269:

Venezuelan activist who was for a time the NY Consul isn't that big a deal. It shows his sympathies, but that's obvious anyway from a cursory glance at his writing.

426:

Personally, I don´t think the declaration "I am a trotskyst" is good enough as to be qualified as a valid reference when Chavez is described as a troskyst properly.

3032:

Deeejazzy said "Any article I read will be in English, and therefore will come from US/UK, which means the organizations will have strong ties to the US." Discuss.

2901:: no editorial oversight and strong ties with Israel and/or United States. And, who's demonizing who? I wonder if this is a case of anti-semitism or anti-Chavism. 2635:

The above is the material I would like to incorporate throughout where suitable. Please let me know how I shall proceed with this or if there are any objections.

1527:

Center for Strategic International Studies, Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere, Peace Corps and Narcotics Affairs.

1400:

Chavez, who was imprisoned in Venezuela at the time. Chavez appears to be thanking the FARC for its delivery to Chavez of approximate US$ 150,000 (1992 value).

469:

Therefore, Knowledge (XXG) being an accurate information provider, is required to take a "I am also a trostkyst" as it is, a declaration from Chavez himself.

1434:

yes it is, plus the fact that Interpol has investigated and found the laptop computers to be free of any manipulation, changes, etc, by the Colombian Govt.

1518:

Here are some links I cut from article, I don't think they provide additional resources for researchers on the subject so I moved them here for discussion:

2467:

Ouch, I see MoS breaches, I see bad prose, I see potentially serious POV, I wonder about the overall balance of the references. Let's take a quick look.

1457:

does not appear to be a source worthy of wiki standards. I would venture to say that there are quite a few sources on this page that are full of these.

1424:

Columbia believes it has enough evidence linking Chavez and FARC to have genocide charges brought against him by the international criminal court...

652:

Also check the sction below (i havent moved it up here yet) where I clarified what my points were and tried to show that Im not just POV spoapboxing.

3969:) "Quoting another editor out-of-context in order to give the impression that he or she hold views they do not hold, or in order to malign them"? 851: 3630:). Using more academic sources would help, but there aren't that many, they're not as up-to-date, and even their authors typically have POV (but 2825:

I think it's worth noting how there has been a rise in anti-semitism in Venezuela since Chavez's rise to power, including government sponsorship.

645:

Oh well, it looks like I have a 2-1 consensus (having waited a week) because some editors cant take the project seriosuly, and feel they have to

3762:

Court justified its 2008 position on the basis that it would otherwise have caused constitutional problems, which may just be blather of course.

940:

opened up their economies from state beurocratic regulation, and are now rapidly developing and mildly prosperous as a result of those policies.

3121: 1847:. There are multiple reliable sources saying that Chávez promotes anti-imperialism so I think you should provide at least a reputable source 1623:

Article is way too long. I'm interested in all the subtopics related in this page, as well as in Chavéz, and I still can't stand to read it.

1059: 826: 812: 784: 769: 744: 667: 653: 478: 444: 3874:. Therefore all remarks/cites/opinions coming from biased sites that receive funding from the Hugo Chavez regime must be clearly identified. 2806: 2731: 2297: 2005: 1194: 1044: 909: 3992: 2496:

When it says "The government of the United States claims that Chávez is a threat to democracy in Latin America.", the implication is that

174: 2704:

I agree, but I was simply stating facts. His support for Chinese imperialism is debated above and a quick search at the google proves it.

610:

some point, somebody might be tempted to flag this topic as "a work of fiction written in in-universe style," but that's another issue.)

3183: 2675: 2601: 2425: 2269: 2192: 1957:. I've also provided you with other sources that don't see him as an anti-imperialist and as such this may not be presented as fact per 1464: 1407: 1380: 1149: 1025: 374: 3950: 3379:

can only be found (translated) in the venezuelanalysis site (Panorama doesn't archive news) so I think they can be a valuable source.

2753: 2705: 2572:

NPOVing. Date formatting is the least of this article's concerns, and could be undertaken if the article issues are ever addressed.

2230: 689: 404: 390: 333: 3170: 2530:

In fact, all criticism was exercised from this article years ago and the article has been Wiki's single most glaring failure of our

319: 250: 132: 2245: 3557:. And, who's demonizing who? I wonder if this is a case of anti-semitism or anti-Chavism. JRSP (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 3820:"None of these organizations can be considered WP:RS: no editorial oversight and strong ties with Israel and/or United States..." 2139: 1132: 3333:, but we must say that the editorial decisions, and news that we cover are not dictated by anybody other than by our volunteers. 1012:

Even if they're certainly far less richer than the first. Understood? So stop with your stupid POV about "some people blablabla"

3202:

independent as an official site can be. If it is to be used as a source its evident conflict of interests need be disclaimed.

3095: 2170: 949:

Democracy, capitalism, and close U.S. relations are the norm in latin america now. Socialism and Chavestistas are the fringe.

3218: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2268:

I would like to propose then some references about his good relashionships with Saddam Hussein. Like it or not it's a fact.

729:(by this I assume South America) the only democratically elected governments currently are left-wing, please name for me a 1699: 1344: 825:

Since I cant find my password, it gives you guys 4 days =P, seeing as its unlikely one of you will make the change for me.

286: 211: 3858:

I have provided enough evidence to prove that use of Venezuelanalysis and Venezuela Information Office is a violation to

2826: 1907: 348: 1660: 1435: 432:

I think, the sentence should be changed from "He is also a trotskyst" to "He is a self-declared trotskyst".-------sabin

229:

Being a controversial statement, it would need to be attributed to Shifter, and possibly balanced with another opinion.

1922: 3457:

Alek, let's focus on the article. Where in the article you can find a doubious statement sourced on venezuelanalisis?

811:

why the statement as it is is not a logical fallacy, or you can discuss it here if you think it is too poorly written.

1397: 4097: 2859: 2643: 38: 713:' simply makes no logical sense to me, its not that is unsourced, it just is a logical fallacy, like the sttement 3125: 3068: 3023: 2969: 2830: 1063: 3794:

I repeat my question, Alek: Where in the article can you find a doubious statement sourced on venezuelanalisis?

1916: 1018:

U will always find some people to think something about someone so dont write this and stay focused on the facts

4034: 2735: 2088:

Actually, Chávez has been very explicit about his views on building socialism within the framework of democracy

1048: 830: 816: 788: 773: 748: 671: 657: 482: 448: 2810: 2301: 2009: 913: 847: 3187: 2679: 2605: 2429: 2295: 2273: 2196: 1468: 3954: 3939:

It seems that those supporting the Venezuelan President in these pages have as much of a problem respecting

3744:

Well I can see you've taken the time to read both sides of the HRW discussion, and aren't just parroting in

3721:." Besides, lest you disclose your credentials, your views do not carry same weight than those of HRW or AI. 3335: 3176: 2709: 1542: 1411: 1376: 1153: 1029: 892: 693: 408: 394: 378: 3946: 3206: 3083: 2749: 2727: 2639: 2597: 2337:

I don't even know what the Venezuela government stats web site is. And in any case, I don't speak spanish.

2188: 2158: 2127: 2062:

He never talks about "democratic socialism" in his speeches, just "socialism". Look into the article about

2001: 1966: 1886: 1834: 1780: 1740: 1687: 1460: 1403: 1368: 1145: 1120: 905: 797:

PS as I mentioned before, some dyslexia issues, bad spelling mainly, feel free to correct if your bothered

685: 440: 400: 370: 351:

say that, Knowledge (XXG) can't call it that way. Our opinions as editors don't count, this is not a blog.

323: 254: 120: 4211: 4149: 3659: 3654:

Glad to hear that, as a member, you put more faith in AI. Perhaps you should include this in the article "

3513: 3372: 2935: 2757: 2580: 2543: 2234: 2135: 1646: 1439: 1357: 1286:

Removed it from article. Here's a copy if someone thinks it can be useful in the article or anywhere else:

1128: 635: 337: 3331:

So, saying that Aporrea "is closely associated with the state", has some -although small- degree of truth

2870:? Also, Chavez's criticisms of Israel have crossed the line into antisemitism. See the US Government's 2071: 2034: 1632:

The español language entry is half the length, with twice the content outside of the presidency timeline.

597: 502: 148: 3651: 2122: 1524: 804:

own way with all their articles. Knowledge (XXG) is not solely left, nor is it solely right, its mixed.

533: 332:

I agree change it to dictator he is subverting the rights of the ooppsition and stole the last election.

166:

This sentence is based on an opinion article and therefore cannot be presented as a statement of fact:

128: 4145: 3763: 2044:

Do you have reliable sources to support these changes? Otherwise, I would disagree with your proposal?

1754: 1656: 1088: 3309:

Evidence that Gregory Wilpert's wife is Chavez's Consul in New York from Venezuela's Official Registry

2786:, stating his 2007 inauguration would mark "a concentration of power without precedent in Venezuela." 1962: 1882: 1830: 1776: 1736: 1252:

Please can I remove the excerpt under 'Military Policy' because it is not a Military Policy at all. --

3918: 3308: 3306:...so his marriage to a Venezuelan activist who was for a time the NY Consul isn't that big a deal... 3064: 3019: 2965: 2131: 2063: 1853:"Promoting" would mean that all his policies are factual examples of anti-imperialism and they're not 1711: 1635:

Just like the content, much of the controversy relates to the timeline of his presidency, not Chavéz.

1525:

The Threat to Democracy in Venezuela and its Implications for the Region and the United States (PDF).

1238: 1124: 2655: 2511:

Indeed, the opening is a forerunner to serious problems in the whole text. A makeover is necessary.

2067: 2030: 1995: 4261: 3883: 3875: 3832: 3824: 3730: 3722: 3674: 3666: 3601: 3593: 3424: 3416: 3346: 3338: 3210: 3145: 3091: 2984: 2880: 2838: 2783: 2166: 1954: 1911: 1733: 1730: 846:

Chávez's reforms have evoked controversy in Venezuela and abroad, receiving anything from vehement

47: 17: 3900:, certainly for the news section. You disagree, but you've yet to demonstrate any inaccuracy. And 2867: 1691: 4317:

Editorial, "Estatiza todo Chávez, vuelve socialista a Venezuela y es el Luis XIV del siglo XXI,"

4275: 3887: 3879: 3836: 3828: 3734: 3726: 3678: 3670: 3618: 3605: 3597: 3428: 3420: 3350: 3342: 3214: 2410: 2089: 1555: 1372: 888: 4257: 4207: 4153: 4101: 4056: 4000: 3497: 3155: 666:

I moved this from the section below, a user replied to my comment (I think) in the wrong section

1663:, I think most of the material can be moved there in order to get a more concise main article. 1551: 1307: 1103: 1078: 4229: 4167: 4115: 4070: 4014: 3506: 2928: 2778: 2573: 2536: 2213: 2013: 1695: 1642: 1601: 1484: 1339: 1257: 987: 964: 628: 279: 204: 3901: 3863: 3627: 2863: 2531: 1958: 1918: 1364:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Hugo_Ch%C3%A1vez&diff=190976084&oldid=190271538

1173:. Reference must be talking about his special research work for obtaining his master degree. 733:

elected right-wing government in this region of South America, and ill change my opinion. By

3692: 3663: 2347: 2324: 1302: 1273: 1142:

Wrong, in the Venezuelan higher education system, a Thesis IS necessary for an Msc degree.

887:

free to correct it, but not change the meaning of what I have written without reason stated.

423:

Just a note, I would make a change if I could, I think someone here should take care of it.

124: 3966: 3940: 3905: 3871: 3867: 3846: 3502: 2092: 1844: 4288: 4242: 4215: 4192: 4180: 4128: 4083: 4027: 3996: 3707:

by essentially saying "pff, you're not worth talking to"? Hmm. Not sure what to say that.

2561: 2519: 2452: 1539: 1234: 1199: 856: 3897: 3859: 2898: 2383:

Bronstein, H. (] ]), ''Washington Post'', Accessed ] ]. Also available at Accessed ] ].

1875: 1856: 1499: 459:

What would be enough? A reference to a socialism specialized third party that states so.

3978: 3958: 3925: 3912: 3891: 3853: 3840: 3813: 3803: 3768: 3754: 3738: 3711: 3682: 3656:

Venezuela: Attacking American Convention on Human Rights jeopardizes everybody's welfare

3638: 3609: 3517: 3466: 3432: 3388: 3354: 3273: 3263: 3239: 3222: 3191: 3161: 3149: 3129: 3111: 3099: 3072: 3036: 3027: 2988: 2973: 2939: 2910: 2884: 2853: 2842: 2814: 2798: 2761: 2739: 2713: 2698: 2683: 2667: 2647: 2609: 2584: 2566: 2547: 2524: 2457: 2433: 2414: 2351: 2328: 2305: 2287: 2277: 2262: 2238: 2217: 2200: 2174: 2143: 2104: 2075: 2053: 2038: 1970: 1933: 1890: 1868: 1838: 1811: 1784: 1765: 1744: 1723: 1703: 1672: 1650: 1618:

Does anyone else feel this article needs some restructuring? Clues that we need a plan:

1605: 1585: 1512: 1488: 1472: 1443: 1425: 1415: 1384: 1348: 1320: 1277: 1261: 1242: 1202: 1182: 1157: 1136: 1106: 1095: 1081: 1067: 1052: 991: 968: 917: 896: 880: 834: 820: 792: 777: 752: 697: 675: 661: 639: 617: 600: 571: 561: 551: 536: 514: 486: 452: 412: 382: 360: 341: 327: 309: 295: 258: 233: 220: 179: 152: 136: 3974: 3799: 3462: 3384: 3235: 3141: 3087: 2980: 2906: 2876: 2834: 2794: 2694: 2663: 2258: 2162: 2100: 2049: 1929: 1864: 1807: 1761: 1719: 1668: 1581: 1508: 1316: 1178: 876: 614: 568: 548: 510: 356: 306: 144: 3140:

have claimed over 500,000 lives, yet aren't criticized by you in nearly the same way.

1878: 624: 557:

There is a link from the lead and another from the criticism section of this article.

3250:

Venezuela even newswires and academics do. VA doesn't too badly I think: eg ref 208 (

2961: 2406: 1920: 1436:

http://www.telemundodallas.com/noticias/16275736/detail.html?rss=dal&psp=noticias

1077:

Why can I not edit this page? It's nothing substantial, only a grammatical mistake.--

477:

that tried to overthrow him and tries to influence the countries political outcomes.

3645:

In the more than twenty years that Human Rights Watch has worked in Latin America,

2209: 1597: 1480: 1332: 1253: 983: 960: 268: 193: 4048: 3289: 2927:

The US State Dept is a reliable source; it just needs to be properly attributed.

2689:

Knowledge (XXG) is not a forum, are these opinions supported by reliable sources?

1914: 1751: 1015:

Some people think bush is a pacifist, some people think whales can fly,etc etc....

1851:

saying this is not true. Unless you provide a source, your interpretation that '

3705: 3702: 3699: 3643:

That's indeed the Human Rights Watch I referred to, mind you the same one that "

3631: 3257: 3254: 3251: 2343: 2320: 1877:. There's also many sources which consider China's handling of Tibet Imperialism 1570: 1454: 1269: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2772:

Predictions for 2007 are outdated in 2009. BTW, did the predictions come true?

3922: 3909: 3850: 3810: 3765: 3751: 3708: 3635: 3270: 3260: 3158: 3108: 3059: 3033: 2850: 2849:

see little that qualifies as "government sponsorship" of it from those links.

2554: 2512: 2445: 1545: 1294: 367:

massive ammount of furs, and then shouting at them for killing more animals.

106: 1024:

Stay to the facts and dont try to think, its far too painful for US citizens.

3970: 3795: 3458: 3380: 3231: 2902: 2871: 2790: 2690: 2659: 2284: 2254: 2096: 2045: 1925: 1860: 1803: 1757: 1715: 1664: 1577: 1504: 1312: 1226: 1174: 1092: 872: 558: 547:

with no link to it is highly unusual -- perhaps in itself a breach of NPOV.

506: 352: 230: 176: 114: 1735:. That's fine, but you can't call someone like that an "anti-emperialist". 1552:"Chávez is a threat because he offers the alternative of a decent society." 2155:

probably will be his ultimate downfall so the graphs should show this...

4052: 3058:

has written an article about neo-con attacks on Chavez as an anti-semite

3055: 861: 3849:: start talking about how to change the article or go back to blogging. 3327:

are about to receive in a few weeks a grant from the Ministry of Culture

2829:. Also he frequently criticizes Israel and the US' support of Israel. 2319:

file anymore, so I don't know how to update that old XLS file in there.

3555:

no editorial oversight and strong ties with Israel and/or United States

1528: 1358:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/theobserver/2006/may/07/featuresreview.review

3137: 2123:

http://www.interpol.int/Public/ICPO/PressReleases/PR2008/PR200817.asp

1560: 532:

The "voted no" and "voted yes" only take in account those who voted.

3908:

apply to WP articles and WP editor behaviour, not external sources.

1362:

Delete Can someone also delete the last thing added to the article.

429:

Also, I dont see any special influence of Trotsky in Chavez´s work.

3180:

celebration of Christmas, last Dec. 24, at a rehabilitation center.

2119:

why are we keeping HC's links to terror groups out of discussion?

496:

Chavez´s bureaucritic policies and control over the justice system

143:

Trotsky was a socialist/communist. So, Trotskyism is socialism. --

2394:''Márquez Humberto''. (IPS ] ]) Accessed ] ]. Also available at 1996:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,552797,00.html

1564: 1532: 1298: 1268:

It is not miltary policy and moreover has not context here...--

1596:

relevant? Isn't that just gossip? and should it be deleted? --

719:'Some hold the opinon that Chavez does not support democracy' 25: 2475:

use "currently". What does it mean next year? Or next decade?

1714:". Someone changed it to "authoritarian" in a previous edit. 3917:

Two suggestions. First, since you've got such a thing about

3719:

critics who opt instead to disseminate baseless allegations

3325:

We and several other alternative and community based media

1756:

so please explain what the Dalai Lama has to do with this.

2833:

is another article to back up his personal anti-semitism.

1540:"The American Friends of Hugo Chavez: Dial 1-800-4-TYRANT" 2964:

is. It certainly doesn't conform with Knowledge (XXG)'s.

1802:

discourse is an important element of Chávez public image.

1732:

and does not support the Dalai Lama in the Tibetan cause

959:

worthless. I recommend all your edits to be reverted.

850:

and enthusiastic support. Some people, especially in the

3505:

of other, more reputable and unbiased reliable sources.

2386:

Bronstein, H. (] ]), ''Washington Post'', Accessed ] ].

717:

for example, I would have no problem with the statement

3246: 2658:, so you don't have to ask for permission, just do it. 2375:

The Economist (] ]). ''The Economist'', Retrieved ] ].

2372:

The Economist (] ]), ''The Economist'', Retrieved ] ].

2362: 1753:, USA Today reports he calls for anti-imperialist unity 1363: 1231: 3823:

principles, take them with its creators, not with me.

3553:

None of these organizations can be considered WP:RS:

3290:

Evidence From Venezuela's Ministry of Foreign Affairs

1426:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7277313.stm

783:

dictators? 'cough' Pinochet 'cough' I cant remeber...

591:

I say I dont have a problem with saying that the USA

4146:"Chávez resumes cooperation agenda in South America" 3698:

HRW? The letter which dismisses a detailed rebuttal

3818:A dose of your own medicine will do you good JRSP: 3323:Martin Sanchez on the source of Aporrea's funding: 3253:) is about an Indian protest against Chavez; 207 ( 1498:Canadian Monkey said he's not clear "what part of 3287:There is no evidence that Sanchez was a Consul... 1267:I think the entire section should be removed: --> 2471:Opening sentence: for good reasons, MOSNUM says 2397:''Márquez Humberto''. (IPS ] ]) . Retrieved ] ]] 1629:Huge sections of timeline are not about Chavéz. 242:Chavez is the current PRESIDENT of Venezuela!!! 3054:I agree that better sources would be needed. 3018:definitions like this, well, that's politics. 2960:I'm not sure how reliable their definition of 2897:None of these organizations can be considered 2858:If those links didn't convince you, how about 2400:''Márquez Humberto''. (IPS ] ]) Accessed ] ]. 1626:Article is well over 200 references in length. 249:Another Economist/CIA backed edit no doubt. -- 1455:http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/1418 8: 4212:"Hugo Chavez: The Radical with Deep Pockets" 738:far as I know Chavez is not a threat to any 162:This sentence is based on an opinion article 4262:"Hugo Chavez: Leading the Left-Wing Charge" 3060:http://www.antiwar.com/lobe/?articleid=8390 1571:CIA Venezuela Destabilization Memo Surfaces 542:No link to "Criticism of Hugo Chávez" topic 2776:The leading business daily of Argentina, 2463:In fact, the whole article needs an audit 2357:Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 1710:Reverted to previous version which said " 1169:though many people informally call them 4301:Editorial, "Chávez planificó su vida," 3984: 1684:socialist. Hugo Chavez; not so much. 1221:Material removed from Code Pink article 190:be presented as factual is a bit much. 4284: 4273: 4238: 4227: 4188: 4187:Italic or bold markup not allowed in: 4176: 4165: 4124: 4113: 4079: 4068: 4023: 4012: 3882:) 14:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Alekboyd 3831:) 17:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Alekboyd 3729:) 15:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Alekboyd 3673:) 17:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Alekboyd 3600:) 14:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Alekboyd 3423:) 00:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Alekboyd 3412:My experience with Venezuelanalysis... 3345:) 15:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Alekboyd 1991:Chavez called German chancellor 'Nazi' 1614:Would like to volunteer to restructure 1538:Ortiz, Ana Maria, and Vadum, Matthew. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2616:Incorporating material into this page 7: 3896:Hardly. IMO Venezuelanalysis passes 3329:set aside to help grassroots media. 2246:Knowledge (XXG):Talk page guidelines 1195:Category:Native American politicians 525:Anyone beside me notice that in the 4049:"Sign of hope in US-Venezuela ties" 3993:"Slouching Toward Authoritarianism" 3943:principles as their iconic hero. 2594:Its Fine, don't change anything. 2283:Can you provide a solid reference? 1331:. Another drive-by smear job. < 1225:We recently removed material from 1208:Chavez calls for second referendum 1167:trabajo especial de grado/maestría 397:) 22:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 24: 2420:Relashionship with Saddam Hussein 1659:. There is already an article on 715:'chairs generally have two legs' 4098:"Ofensiva diplomática de Correa" 3634:and academic reputation helps). 3371:Alek, your arguments sound like 1679:Dropped Authoritarian from Intro 29: 3156:Knowledge (XXG) is not a forum. 852:government of the United States 3847:Knowledge (XXG) is not a forum 3748:the HRW line.</sarcasm: --> 2872:Report on Global Anti-Semitism 2654:All editors are encouraged to 2218:00:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 503:Knowledge (XXG) is not a forum 413:22:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 3192:17:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 3162:16:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 3150:16:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 2714:22:10, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 2699:18:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 2684:17:52, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 2668:21:43, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 2648:05:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 2585:16:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 2567:08:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 2548:08:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 2525:08:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 2458:08:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1385:20:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 1349:00:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC) 1203:23:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 453:08:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 361:22:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 342:20:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 328:21:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 310:18:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 296:18:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 259:18:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 234:00:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 221:00:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 180:00:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 3979:17:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3959:17:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3926:17:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3913:17:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3892:14:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3854:00:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3845:Issue isn't the principles. 3841:17:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3814:15:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3804:15:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3769:00:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3755:17:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3739:15:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3712:00:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3683:17:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3639:15:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3610:14:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3518:13:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3467:02:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3433:00:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3389:21:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3355:15:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3274:13:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3264:13:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3240:21:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3223:15:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3130:05:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 3112:10:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 3100:22:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 3073:23:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 3037:23:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 3028:23:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 2989:23:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 2974:20:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 2940:20:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 2911:20:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 2885:18:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 2854:21:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2843:21:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2815:14:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 2762:03:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 2306:22:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 2288:12:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC) 1843:"Self-aclaimed" sounds as a 1321:23:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 1278:20:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 1262:20:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 1243:11:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 1183:11:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 1158:16:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 1137:11:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 1107:18:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 1096:18:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 1082:18:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 992:16:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 969:07:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 918:22:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 881:10:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 835:10:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 821:10:20, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 793:19:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 778:19:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 753:00:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 698:18:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 676:19:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 662:00:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 640:17:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 618:17:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 601:20:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 586:outside Venezuela, when the 572:02:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 562:02:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 552:02:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 537:20:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 527:Hugo Chavez Election Results 515:14:29, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 487:16:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 383:03:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 137:22:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 2799:12:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 2740:17:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 2610:13:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 2434:16:08, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 897:18:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 862:100 most influential people 4341: 3870:. I agree with JRSP about 3704:of the original criticism 3660:Amnesty International link 2493:"Nation wide" is one word. 2415:10:12, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 2363:the last revision I edited 2352:22:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 2329:00:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 2278:19:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 1724:21:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 1704:14:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 1673:19:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 1651:18:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 1606:11:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 1591:Neutrality and Irrelevance 1489:09:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 1189:Native American politician 2263:23:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC) 2239:16:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC) 2224:Friendship with Dictators 2201:03:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC) 2175:04:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 2144:14:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 2105:11:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 2076:07:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 1661:Presidency of Hugo Chávez 1586:12:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 1513:05:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 1473:02:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 1416:21:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 1053:20:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 623:Knowledge (XXG) reflects 2821:Government Anti-Semitism 2054:10:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 2039:09:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 2020:Minor changes to opening 2014:09:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 1971:01:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1934:01:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1891:00:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1869:00:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1839:00:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1812:23:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 1785:22:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 1766:21:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 1745:20:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 1444:16:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 1068:19:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 3177:Simon Wiesenthal Center 3171:Centro Simon Wiesenthal 2314:Updated economic charts 1543:Capital Research Center 711:democracy in the region 153:16:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 4283:Check date values in: 4237:Check date values in: 4175:Check date values in: 4123:Check date values in: 4078:Check date values in: 4022:Check date values in: 3373:shooting the messenger 2788: 1638: 1310: 867: 840:OK, the paragraph says 735:democratically elected 172: 2774: 2719:An extraordinary read 1620: 1291: 843: 567:Oh, I see it. Sorry. 168: 42:of past discussions. 3919:Venezuelanalysis.com 3664:see HRW's reply here 2478:"Also" is redundant. 2064:democratic socialism 1797:The article said he 1712:democratic socialism 1391:Worthy of Inclusion? 3941:Knowledge (XXG):CIV 2784:Louis XIV of France 2380:"PostVoterRolls" : 1990: 1955:Chinese Imperialism 1908:WP:Reliable sources 649:and be funny...... 3965:Do you mean (from 3619:Human Rights Watch 3107:wasn't the issue. 3079:much explain it. 2768:Outdated paragraph 1573:November 28th 2007 1556:Guardian Unlimited 4319:Ambito Financiero 4303:Ambito Financiero 4033:CS1 maint: year ( 3949:comment added by 3701:of HRW's defence 3694:in an attempt to 3226: 3209:comment added by 3103: 3086:comment added by 2779:Ambito Financiero 2752:comment added by 2730:comment added by 2600:comment added by 2203: 2191:comment added by 2177: 2161:comment added by 2150:Inflation Numbers 2146: 2130:comment added by 2115:LInk to Terrorism 2093:original research 2016: 2004:comment added by 1857:original research 1706: 1690:comment added by 1475: 1463:comment added by 1418: 1406:comment added by 1387: 1371:comment added by 1160: 1148:comment added by 1139: 1123:comment added by 920: 908:comment added by 700: 688:comment added by 455: 443:comment added by 403:comment added by 385: 373:comment added by 139: 123:comment added by 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4332: 4325: 4324: 4315: 4309: 4308: 4299: 4293: 4292: 4286: 4281: 4279: 4271: 4269: 4268: 4253: 4247: 4246: 4240: 4235: 4233: 4225: 4223: 4222: 4203: 4197: 4196: 4190: 4184: 4178: 4173: 4171: 4163: 4161: 4160: 4142: 4136: 4135: 4132: 4126: 4121: 4119: 4111: 4109: 4108: 4094: 4088: 4087: 4081: 4076: 4074: 4066: 4064: 4063: 4045: 4039: 4038: 4031: 4025: 4020: 4018: 4010: 4008: 4007: 3989: 3961: 3743:<sarcasm: --> 3510: 3225: 3203: 3167:a reliable WP:RS 3102: 3080: 2932: 2764: 2742: 2640:CanadianChavista 2612: 2577: 2564: 2559: 2540: 2522: 2517: 2455: 2450: 2186: 2156: 2125: 1999: 1685: 1458: 1401: 1366: 1303:Associated Press 1143: 1118: 903: 683: 632: 625:reliable sources 438: 415: 368: 349:reliable sources 347:Unless multiple 290: 283: 275: 272: 215: 208: 200: 197: 118: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:Talk:Hugo Chávez 4340: 4339: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4322: 4316: 4312: 4306: 4300: 4296: 4282: 4272: 4266: 4264: 4255: 4254: 4250: 4236: 4226: 4220: 4218: 4205: 4204: 4200: 4186: 4174: 4164: 4158: 4156: 4144: 4143: 4139: 4133: 4122: 4112: 4106: 4104: 4096: 4095: 4091: 4077: 4067: 4061: 4059: 4047: 4046: 4042: 4032: 4021: 4011: 4005: 4003: 3997:Foreign Affairs 3991: 3990: 3986: 3944: 3746:shouty boldface 3508: 3204: 3199: 3122:220.233.176.162 3081: 3065:The Four Deuces 3020:Lapsed Pacifist 2966:Lapsed Pacifist 2930: 2823: 2770: 2747: 2725: 2721: 2618: 2595: 2575: 2562: 2555: 2538: 2520: 2513: 2490:Redundant "in". 2465: 2453: 2446: 2441: 2422: 2391:"Crosshairs" : 2359: 2316: 2226: 2183: 2152: 2117: 2022: 1993: 1681: 1616: 1593: 1496: 1451: 1393: 1250: 1248:Military Policy 1223: 1210: 1191: 1114: 1075: 1060:137.246.104.100 827:172.216.245.193 813:172.216.245.193 785:172.142.197.162 770:172.142.197.162 745:172.142.232.113 721:. Specifically 668:172.142.197.162 654:172.142.232.113 630: 579: 544: 523: 479:172.142.197.162 445:124.187.225.104 421: 398: 288: 281: 273: 270: 244: 213: 206: 198: 195: 164: 111: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4338: 4336: 4327: 4326: 4310: 4294: 4256:Padgett, Tim ( 4248: 4206:Padgett, Tim ( 4198: 4137: 4089: 4040: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3915: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3714: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3266: 3198: 3195: 3153: 3152: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3030: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2822: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2807:190.72.221.194 2769: 2766: 2732:218.186.12.210 2720: 2717: 2702: 2701: 2671: 2670: 2617: 2614: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2509: 2508: 2505: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2479: 2476: 2464: 2461: 2440: 2437: 2421: 2418: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2398: 2395: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2384: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2373: 2358: 2355: 2315: 2312: 2310: 2298:85.242.238.195 2291: 2290: 2266: 2265: 2225: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2182: 2181:Public Opinion 2179: 2151: 2148: 2116: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2057: 2056: 2021: 2018: 2006:84.164.207.163 1992: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1769: 1768: 1727: 1726: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1637: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1627: 1624: 1615: 1612: 1610: 1592: 1589: 1575: 1574: 1568: 1550:Pilger, John. 1548: 1536: 1523:Diaz, Miguel. 1520: 1519: 1495: 1494:External links 1492: 1450: 1449:Not noteworthy 1447: 1433: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1392: 1389: 1354: 1352: 1351: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1281: 1280: 1249: 1246: 1222: 1219: 1209: 1206: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1113: 1110: 1099: 1098: 1089:semi-protected 1074: 1071: 1045:86.133.101.176 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1022: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1010: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 974: 973: 972: 971: 953: 952: 951: 950: 944: 943: 942: 941: 934: 933: 932: 931: 927: 910:201.233.245.66 884: 883: 842: 841: 807: 800: 757: 731:democratically 643: 642: 598:172.143.124.86 578: 575: 565: 564: 543: 540: 522: 519: 518: 517: 491: 458: 435: 420: 417: 364: 363: 315: 314: 313: 312: 299: 298: 294: 243: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 224: 223: 219: 163: 160: 156: 155: 110: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4337: 4320: 4314: 4311: 4304: 4298: 4295: 4290: 4277: 4263: 4259: 4252: 4249: 4244: 4231: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4202: 4199: 4194: 4182: 4169: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4141: 4138: 4130: 4117: 4103: 4099: 4093: 4090: 4085: 4072: 4058: 4054: 4050: 4044: 4041: 4036: 4029: 4016: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3988: 3985: 3980: 3976: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3942: 3927: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3914: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3821: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3812: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3770: 3767: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3753: 3747: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3715: 3713: 3710: 3706: 3703: 3700: 3697: 3693: 3690: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3648: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3624: 3620: 3617: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3558: 3556: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3504: 3499: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3413: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3337: 3334: 3332: 3328: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3310: 3307: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3291: 3288: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3275: 3272: 3267: 3265: 3262: 3258: 3255: 3252: 3248: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3196: 3194: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3184:84.137.90.167 3181: 3178: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3163: 3160: 3157: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3113: 3110: 3105: 3104: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3061: 3057: 3038: 3035: 3031: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2962:anti-Semitism 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2852: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2787: 2785: 2781: 2780: 2773: 2767: 2765: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2743: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2718: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2676:85.242.238.24 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2636: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2615: 2613: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2602:75.57.150.129 2599: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2565: 2560: 2558: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2523: 2518: 2516: 2506: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2492: 2489: 2485: 2480: 2477: 2474: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2462: 2460: 2459: 2456: 2451: 2449: 2438: 2436: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2426:81.193.220.58 2419: 2417: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2399: 2396: 2393: 2392: 2390: 2385: 2382: 2381: 2379: 2374: 2371: 2370: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2364: 2356: 2354: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2338: 2335: 2331: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2313: 2311: 2308: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2289: 2286: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2270:81.193.190.20 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2193:76.105.207.31 2190: 2180: 2178: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2149: 2147: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2124: 2120: 2114: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2026: 2019: 2017: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1997: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1963:- PietervHuis 1960: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1921: 1919: 1917: 1915: 1912: 1909: 1906:Please check 1892: 1888: 1884: 1883:- PietervHuis 1879: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1845:word to avoid 1842: 1841: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1831:- PietervHuis 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1777:- PietervHuis 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1737:- PietervHuis 1734: 1731: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1634: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1622: 1621: 1619: 1613: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1590: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1572: 1569: 1566: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1541: 1537: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1501: 1493: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1476: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1465:70.162.157.98 1462: 1456: 1448: 1446: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1408:24.211.242.80 1405: 1398: 1390: 1388: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1373:N4GMiraflores 1370: 1365: 1360: 1359: 1350: 1346: 1343: 1342: 1337: 1335: 1330: 1329:at the border 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1309: 1308: 1304: 1301:article from 1300: 1296: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1247: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1220: 1218: 1214: 1207: 1205: 1204: 1201: 1196: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150:200.109.32.51 1147: 1140: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1111: 1109: 1108: 1105: 1097: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1072: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1031: 1027: 1026:77.196.65.163 1023: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1011: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 993: 989: 985: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 970: 966: 962: 957: 956: 955: 954: 948: 947: 946: 945: 938: 937: 936: 935: 928: 925: 924: 923: 922: 921: 919: 915: 911: 907: 899: 898: 894: 890: 889:Anti-BS Squad 882: 878: 874: 869: 868: 866: 865: 863: 858: 855: 853: 849: 839: 838: 837: 836: 832: 828: 823: 822: 818: 814: 808: 805: 801: 798: 795: 794: 790: 786: 780: 779: 775: 771: 767: 766:in the region 762: 761:in the region 755: 754: 750: 746: 741: 736: 732: 728: 727:In the region 724: 723:in the region 720: 716: 712: 707: 701: 699: 695: 691: 687: 679: 677: 673: 669: 664: 663: 659: 655: 650: 648: 641: 637: 633: 626: 622: 621: 620: 619: 616: 611: 608: 603: 602: 599: 594: 589: 588:United States 585: 584:barely exists 576: 574: 573: 570: 563: 560: 556: 555: 554: 553: 550: 541: 539: 538: 535: 534:157.253.22.14 530: 528: 521:Faulty Table? 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 501: 500: 499: 497: 492: 489: 488: 484: 480: 474: 470: 467: 463: 460: 456: 454: 450: 446: 442: 433: 430: 427: 424: 418: 416: 414: 410: 406: 402: 396: 392: 386: 384: 380: 376: 375:68.189.133.20 372: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 345: 344: 343: 339: 335: 330: 329: 325: 321: 311: 308: 303: 302: 301: 300: 297: 292: 291: 285: 284: 277: 276: 266: 263: 262: 261: 260: 256: 252: 247: 241: 235: 232: 228: 227: 226: 225: 222: 217: 216: 210: 209: 202: 201: 191: 189: 184: 183: 182: 181: 178: 175: 171: 167: 161: 159: 154: 150: 146: 142: 141: 140: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 116: 108: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4323:(in Spanish) 4318: 4313: 4307:(in Spanish) 4302: 4297: 4265:. Retrieved 4251: 4219:. Retrieved 4201: 4157:. Retrieved 4150:El Universal 4140: 4134:(in Spanish) 4105:. Retrieved 4092: 4060:. Retrieved 4043: 4004:. Retrieved 3987: 3951:77.99.170.44 3938: 3819: 3793: 3745: 3718: 3695: 3688: 3655: 3646: 3644: 3622: 3615: 3554: 3552: 3411: 3376: 3330: 3326: 3324: 3305: 3286: 3247:this version 3200: 3174: 3166: 3165: 3154: 3118: 3053: 2824: 2789: 2777: 2775: 2771: 2754:86.4.219.193 2744: 2722: 2706:85.242.236.5 2703: 2672: 2637: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2619: 2593: 2556: 2514: 2510: 2501: 2497: 2483: 2472: 2466: 2447: 2442: 2423: 2405: 2369:"EconPov" : 2360: 2342: 2339: 2336: 2332: 2317: 2309: 2292: 2267: 2249: 2231:85.244.48.94 2227: 2184: 2153: 2121: 2118: 2027: 2023: 1994: 1905: 1852: 1848: 1798: 1728: 1682: 1643:Robbiemuffin 1639: 1617: 1609: 1594: 1576: 1554: 1497: 1477: 1452: 1432: 1394: 1361: 1353: 1340: 1333: 1328: 1311: 1292: 1251: 1224: 1215: 1211: 1192: 1170: 1166: 1141: 1115: 1100: 1076: 1056: 1041: 900: 885: 859: 845: 844: 824: 809: 806: 802: 799: 796: 781: 765: 760: 756: 739: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 705: 702: 690:129.215.66.1 680: 665: 651: 646: 644: 612: 606: 604: 592: 587: 583: 580: 566: 545: 531: 526: 524: 495: 493: 490: 475: 471: 468: 464: 461: 457: 434: 431: 428: 425: 422: 405:190.74.70.77 391:190.74.70.77 387: 365: 334:65.96.135.42 331: 318:approval. -- 316: 287: 280: 269: 248: 245: 212: 205: 194: 187: 173: 169: 165: 157: 112: 78: 43: 37: 4189:|publisher= 3945:—Preceding 3632:peer review 3205:—Preceding 3082:—Preceding 2748:—Preceding 2726:—Preceding 2620:Hello all, 2596:—Preceding 2187:—Preceding 2157:—Preceding 2126:—Preceding 2000:—Preceding 1874:imperialist 1686:—Preceding 1459:—Preceding 1402:—Preceding 1367:—Preceding 1144:—Preceding 1119:—Preceding 1087:Article is 904:—Preceding 860:magazine's 684:—Preceding 607:in favor of 605:I would be 439:—Preceding 399:—Preceding 369:—Preceding 320:24.150.77.3 251:24.150.77.3 125:Spongesquid 119:—Preceding 36:This is an 4267:2006-07-26 4258:2006-05-08 4221:2006-12-31 4208:2005-04-10 4159:2006-12-19 4154:2006-12-08 4107:2006-12-28 4102:2006-12-28 4100:. Al Día. 4062:2006-12-19 4057:2006-12-15 4006:2007-11-08 4001:2007-11-08 3503:due weight 3498:due weight 2132:Ellyroldan 1849:explicitly 1546:March 2008 1295:January 22 1235:SchuminWeb 1200:Nat Krause 1193:I removed 1125:Santafe785 107:Trotskyist 98:Archive 25 90:Archive 21 85:Archive 20 79:Archive 19 73:Archive 18 68:Archive 17 60:Archive 15 4276:cite news 3687:You cite 3614:You mean 3142:Deeejazzy 3088:Deeejazzy 2981:Deeejazzy 2877:Deeejazzy 2868:the other 2835:Deeejazzy 2439:date mess 2163:Benggriff 2068:Contralya 2031:Contralya 1453:Note 27: 1227:Code Pink 1112:Education 848:criticism 743:adressed. 740:left-wing 615:Gruffbear 569:Gruffbear 549:Gruffbear 419:Trotskysm 307:SqueakBox 145:Hillawiya 115:Socialism 4230:cite web 4168:cite web 4116:cite web 4071:cite web 4053:BBC News 4015:cite web 3947:unsigned 3884:Alekboyd 3876:Alekboyd 3833:Alekboyd 3825:Alekboyd 3731:Alekboyd 3723:Alekboyd 3675:Alekboyd 3667:Alekboyd 3652:see here 3602:Alekboyd 3594:Alekboyd 3425:Alekboyd 3417:Alekboyd 3377:Panorama 3347:Alekboyd 3339:Alekboyd 3336:See here 3219:contribs 3211:Alekboyd 3207:unsigned 3096:contribs 3084:unsigned 3056:Jim Lobe 2750:unsigned 2728:unsigned 2598:unsigned 2407:DumZiBoT 2189:unsigned 2171:contribs 2159:unsigned 2140:contribs 2128:unsigned 2002:unsigned 1799:promotes 1700:contribs 1688:unsigned 1657:Be Bold! 1461:unsigned 1404:unsigned 1381:contribs 1369:unsigned 1198:person.— 1146:unsigned 1133:contribs 1121:unsigned 926:To anon: 906:unsigned 686:unsigned 441:unsigned 401:unsigned 371:unsigned 133:contribs 121:unsigned 3902:WP:NPOV 3864:WP:NPOV 3696:support 3691:letter 3628:WP:NPOV 3509:Georgia 3197:Sources 2931:Georgia 2656:be bold 2576:Georgia 2539:Georgia 2532:WP:NPOV 2502:chiefly 2210:Uwaisis 1959:WP:NPOV 1692:Ktaylor 1598:Uwaisis 1529:June 24 1481:Vbevins 1254:Uwaisis 1073:Editing 984:Chudogg 961:Chudogg 631:Georgia 39:archive 4285:|date= 4239:|date= 4177:|date= 4125:|date= 4080:|date= 4024:|year= 3967:WP:CIV 3906:WP:NOR 3872:WP:NOT 3868:WP:NOR 3866:, and 3138:Darfur 2866:, and 2563:(talk) 2521:(talk) 2454:(talk) 2344:Loisel 2340:Halp! 2321:Loisel 2251:views. 1561:May 13 1270:Agrofe 593:claims 577:Chavez 188:cannot 3923:Rd232 3910:Rd232 3898:WP:RS 3860:WP:RS 3851:Rd232 3811:Rd232 3766:Rd232 3752:Rd232 3709:Rd232 3636:Rd232 3623:every 3507:Sandy 3271:Rd232 3261:Rd232 3159:Rd232 3109:Rd232 3034:Rd232 2929:Sandy 2899:WP:RS 2851:Rd232 2574:Sandy 2537:Sandy 2484:quite 2473:don't 2244:From 1855:' is 1500:WP:EL 1396:FARC. 1347:: --> 1345:edits 1336:eland 1171:tesis 930:such. 706:meant 629:Sandy 494:???? 293:: --> 289:edits 274:eland 218:: --> 214:edits 199:eland 16:< 4289:help 4243:help 4216:Time 4193:help 4181:help 4129:help 4084:help 4035:link 4028:help 3975:talk 3971:JRSP 3955:talk 3904:and 3888:talk 3880:talk 3837:talk 3829:talk 3800:talk 3796:JRSP 3735:talk 3727:talk 3689:this 3679:talk 3671:talk 3616:this 3606:talk 3598:talk 3514:Talk 3463:talk 3459:JRSP 3429:talk 3421:talk 3385:talk 3381:JRSP 3351:talk 3343:talk 3236:talk 3232:JRSP 3215:talk 3188:talk 3182:" -- 3175:The 3146:talk 3126:talk 3092:talk 3069:talk 3024:talk 2985:talk 2970:talk 2936:Talk 2907:talk 2903:JRSP 2881:talk 2864:that 2860:this 2839:talk 2831:Here 2827:link 2811:talk 2795:talk 2791:JRSP 2758:talk 2736:talk 2710:talk 2695:talk 2691:JRSP 2680:talk 2664:talk 2660:JRSP 2644:talk 2606:talk 2581:Talk 2557:Tony 2544:Talk 2515:Tony 2498:only 2448:Tony 2430:talk 2411:talk 2348:talk 2325:talk 2302:talk 2285:Geni 2274:talk 2259:talk 2255:JRSP 2235:talk 2214:talk 2197:talk 2167:talk 2136:talk 2101:talk 2097:JRSP 2072:talk 2050:talk 2046:JRSP 2035:talk 2010:talk 1967:talk 1930:talk 1926:JRSP 1887:talk 1865:talk 1861:JRSP 1835:talk 1808:talk 1804:JRSP 1781:talk 1762:talk 1758:JRSP 1741:talk 1720:talk 1716:JRSP 1696:talk 1669:talk 1665:JRSP 1647:talk 1602:talk 1582:talk 1578:JRSP 1565:2006 1533:2004 1509:talk 1505:JRSP 1485:talk 1469:talk 1440:talk 1412:talk 1377:talk 1341:talk 1317:talk 1313:JRSP 1299:2008 1274:talk 1258:talk 1239:Talk 1179:talk 1175:JRSP 1154:talk 1129:talk 1104:SCJE 1093:JRSP 1079:SCJE 1064:talk 1049:talk 1030:talk 1009:one. 988:talk 965:talk 914:talk 893:talk 877:talk 873:JRSP 857:Time 831:talk 817:talk 789:talk 774:talk 749:talk 694:talk 672:talk 658:talk 636:Talk 559:JRSP 511:talk 507:JRSP 483:talk 449:talk 409:talk 395:talk 379:talk 357:talk 353:JRSP 338:talk 324:talk 282:talk 267:< 255:talk 231:JRSP 207:talk 192:< 177:JRSP 149:talk 129:talk 4260:). 4210:). 3650:." 3173:: " 2500:or 2487:it. 2361:In 1233:. 768:'. 660:) 647:try 505:. — 117:. 4280:: 4278:}} 4274:{{ 4234:: 4232:}} 4228:{{ 4214:. 4185:; 4172:: 4170:}} 4166:{{ 4152:. 4148:. 4120:: 4118:}} 4114:{{ 4075:: 4073:}} 4069:{{ 4055:. 4051:. 4019:: 4017:}} 4013:{{ 3999:. 3995:. 3977:) 3957:) 3890:) 3862:, 3839:) 3802:) 3737:) 3681:) 3658:" 3608:) 3516:) 3465:) 3431:) 3387:) 3353:) 3259:. 3238:) 3221:) 3217:• 3190:) 3169:: 3148:) 3128:) 3098:) 3094:• 3071:) 3026:) 2987:) 2972:) 2938:) 2909:) 2883:) 2841:) 2813:) 2797:) 2760:) 2738:) 2712:) 2697:) 2682:) 2666:) 2650:) 2646:) 2608:) 2583:) 2546:) 2432:) 2413:) 2350:) 2327:) 2304:) 2276:) 2261:) 2253:. 2248:: 2237:) 2216:) 2199:) 2173:) 2169:• 2142:) 2138:• 2103:) 2095:. 2074:) 2052:) 2037:) 2012:) 1969:) 1932:) 1924:. 1889:) 1867:) 1859:. 1837:) 1810:) 1783:) 1764:) 1743:) 1722:) 1702:) 1698:• 1671:) 1649:) 1604:) 1584:) 1563:, 1531:, 1511:) 1487:) 1471:) 1442:) 1414:) 1383:) 1379:• 1334:el 1319:) 1297:, 1293:A 1276:) 1260:) 1241:) 1181:) 1156:) 1135:) 1131:• 1102:-- 1066:) 1051:) 990:) 967:) 916:) 895:) 879:) 833:) 819:) 791:) 776:) 751:) 696:) 678:: 674:) 638:) 513:) 485:) 451:) 411:) 381:) 359:) 340:) 326:) 271:el 257:) 196:el 151:) 135:) 131:• 94:→ 64:← 4291:) 4287:( 4270:. 4245:) 4241:( 4224:. 4195:) 4191:( 4183:) 4179:( 4162:. 4131:) 4127:( 4110:. 4086:) 4082:( 4065:. 4037:) 4030:) 4026:( 4009:. 3973:( 3953:( 3886:( 3878:( 3835:( 3827:( 3798:( 3733:( 3725:( 3717:" 3677:( 3669:( 3626:( 3604:( 3596:( 3512:( 3461:( 3427:( 3419:( 3383:( 3349:( 3341:( 3234:( 3213:( 3186:( 3144:( 3124:( 3090:( 3067:( 3022:( 2983:( 2968:( 2934:( 2905:( 2879:( 2862:, 2837:( 2809:( 2793:( 2756:( 2734:( 2708:( 2693:( 2678:( 2662:( 2642:( 2638:( 2604:( 2579:( 2542:( 2428:( 2409:( 2346:( 2323:( 2300:( 2272:( 2257:( 2233:( 2212:( 2195:( 2165:( 2134:( 2099:( 2070:( 2048:( 2033:( 2008:( 1965:( 1928:( 1885:( 1863:( 1833:( 1806:( 1779:( 1760:( 1739:( 1718:( 1694:( 1667:( 1645:( 1600:( 1580:( 1567:. 1558:, 1535:. 1507:( 1483:( 1467:( 1438:( 1410:( 1375:( 1338:/ 1315:( 1272:( 1256:( 1237:( 1177:( 1152:( 1127:( 1062:( 1047:( 1032:) 1028:( 986:( 963:( 912:( 891:( 875:( 864:. 829:( 815:( 787:( 772:( 747:( 692:( 670:( 656:( 634:( 509:( 481:( 447:( 407:( 393:( 377:( 355:( 336:( 322:( 278:/ 253:( 203:/ 147:( 127:( 109:? 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index