801:
781:
765:
725:
700:
677:
665:
644:
628:
616:
585:
549:
42:
317:). While this does reflect the structure of Coates' excellent book, he uses it as a device to introduce the 9th Division, and I think that the emphasis on this unit here is a bit too strong. I don't believe that the statement that "The only Allied forces available to secure Lae and Finschhafen were Australians from the 9th Division" is correct.
483:
changes look good to me, and I'm pleased to pass the article. I hope to see this a A class sometime soon ;) As a final suggestion, you might want to flesh out the coverage of the Allied force's technical superiority - this is an interesting an important point, and you could discuss how they made good
433:
For A class (and beyond, I hope) you might want to dig through the war diaries on the AWM's website to see if you can find some maps of this fighting - Hawkeye might be able to help with this as he found the excellent map of the advance to
Fortification Point (the source he used (the 9th Division's
217:
You might want to note the poor quality of some of the
Japanese units (from memory, the 20th division was being used to build roads at the time of the landing at Lae, and was regarded as low-quality outfit; I may be confusing it with another unit though).
177:
I've deleted this. I seem to recall that this is what the source says, but I had to send the book back to the library a couple of days ago, so I can't check it now. I will try to get the library to send the book back as soon as possible.
320:
added mention of the 503rd's landing. Re the statement, I seem to recall that that is what the source states, but again I don't have the book to hand. I've tweaked the wording to make it a bit less pointed.
466:
Thanks for the review, Nick. As always, you raise some excellent points that will stand the article in good stead for further development. Please let me know if you think it needs more work. Regards,
201:
I've added a little bit on this now. I've haven't read
Bradley's book yet, although I might be able to get it through the work library. I will see if I can put in a request tomorrow.
47:
313:
I'm a bit surprised that the 'Prelude' section only briefly mentions the role of the 7th
Division, and doesn't note the role of the US parachute regiment at all (or link to the FA
401:
Yes, indeed. I'm not sure that it held the same significance in the minds of their opponents, though. I've tried to clarify this a bit. Do you think it needs further explanation?
174:"and the destruction of the Japanese Army's ability to seize the initiative in the region" - this might be a bit of an overstatement given the strategic situation at the time
170:
The coverage of the fighting is excellent, and the article is generally very good. However, I think that the focus on the 9th
Division is too tight at times. My comments are:
126:
80:
382:
I added a small bit on this, although I will add a bit more on this before taking the article to ACR. I will have to get the sources out from the library again.
122:
379:
You may wish to note that most of the
Japanese forces managed to sidestep the American beachhead at Saidor, leading to problems for the Allies down the track.
256:"These waterways rise towards " - "These waterways descend from" might work better, though I'd be happy to defer to your judgement on the correct terminology
70:
52:
107:
755:
579:
198:'s important role in drawing Japanese attention away from Lae prior to the landings there (Philip Bradley's recent book on this topic is fantastic)
99:
527:
75:
337:"Lae had fallen more quickly than the Allies had anticipated and they exploited the advantage quickly." - slightly repetitive
638:
156:
115:
17:
357:
759:
503:
471:
457:
406:
387:
368:
345:
326:
286:
264:
245:
226:
206:
183:
195:
559:
747:
751:
602:
92:
719:
499:
467:
453:
402:
383:
364:
341:
322:
282:
260:
241:
222:
202:
179:
398:"The Japanese also had a reputation for not taking prisoners" - so did the Australians, unfortunately.
448:
I've added a map for the Lae area and I have hopes of maybe getting something for the Wareo section.
275:
The first para of the 'military situation' section should note the failed
Japanese offensive in the
449:
314:
811:
739:
610:
567:
489:
439:
420:
300:
150:
237:
The description of the capture of Lae in the lead should also note the 7th
Division's role
221:
Yes, that is correct, I believe. I've added mention of this using Miller as the reference.
531:
815:
507:
493:
475:
461:
443:
424:
410:
391:
372:
349:
330:
304:
290:
268:
249:
230:
210:
187:
160:
690:
563:
498:
Thanks for your time with this, Nick. I will look to expand that before ACR. Regards,
775:
575:
571:
276:
807:
485:
435:
416:
296:
281:
Added mention, but I didn't go into much detail. Do you think more is required?
146:
434:
report on the campaign) has some not-great quality maps of the region.
194:
The lead and early sections of the article should briefly note the
774:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
452:
is working on something at the moment, I think. Regards,
480:
134:
103:
625:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
356:"Japanese marines" - to be really pedantic, the
360:weren't 'marines', but rather naval infantry.
259:That's a fair call. I went with "flow from".
8:
30:
61:
33:
7:
697:Fair representation without bias:
295:No, that's all I was thinking of.
24:
799:
779:
763:
723:
698:
675:
663:
642:
626:
614:
583:
547:
484:use of tanks, artillery, etc.
1:
800:
780:
764:
724:
699:
676:
664:
643:
627:
615:
584:
548:
18:Talk:Huon Peninsula campaign
358:Special Naval Landing Force
836:
816:10:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
508:12:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
494:10:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
476:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
462:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
444:11:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
425:10:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
411:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
392:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
373:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
350:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
331:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
305:10:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
291:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
269:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
250:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
240:I've added a bit on this.
231:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
211:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
188:13:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
161:11:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
756:valid fair use rationales
743:to illustrate the topic?
541:reasonably well written
657:broad in its coverage
611:References to sources
415:No, that looks good.
196:Salamaua–Lae campaign
639:No original research
662:A. Major aspects:
598:factually accurate
546:A. Prose quality:
776:suitable captions
758:are provided for
315:Landing at Nadzab
89:
88:
827:
803:
802:
783:
782:
767:
766:
760:non-free content
752:copyright status
727:
726:
702:
701:
679:
678:
667:
666:
646:
645:
630:
629:
618:
617:
587:
586:
551:
550:
500:AustralianRupert
468:AustralianRupert
454:AustralianRupert
403:AustralianRupert
384:AustralianRupert
365:AustralianRupert
342:AustralianRupert
323:AustralianRupert
283:AustralianRupert
261:AustralianRupert
242:AustralianRupert
223:AustralianRupert
203:AustralianRupert
180:AustralianRupert
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
835:
834:
830:
829:
828:
826:
825:
824:
562:compliance for
524:
168:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
833:
831:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
798:Pass or Fail:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
772:
771:
770:
746:A. Images are
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
672:
671:
670:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
635:
634:
633:
623:
622:
621:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
572:words to watch
556:
555:
554:
523:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
396:
395:
394:
377:
376:
375:
354:
353:
352:
335:
334:
333:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
273:
272:
271:
254:
253:
252:
235:
234:
233:
215:
214:
213:
192:
191:
190:
167:
164:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
832:
817:
813:
809:
805:
804:
797:
796:
794:
791:
785:
784:
777:
773:
769:
768:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
744:
742:
741:
735:
729:
728:
721:
717:
716:
714:
710:
704:
703:
696:
695:
693:
692:
687:
681:
680:
673:
669:
668:
661:
660:
658:
654:
648:
647:
640:
636:
632:
631:
624:
620:
619:
612:
608:
607:
605:
604:
599:
595:
589:
588:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
552:
545:
544:
542:
538:
537:
536:
535:
533:
530:review – see
529:
521:
509:
505:
501:
497:
496:
495:
491:
487:
482:
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:SpoolWhippets
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
432:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
400:
399:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
361:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
336:
332:
328:
324:
319:
318:
316:
312:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
288:
284:
280:
279:
278:
277:Battle of Wau
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
257:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
176:
175:
173:
172:
171:
165:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
792:
737:
712:
689:
674:B. Focused:
656:
601:
597:
540:
534:for criteria
526:
525:
169:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
806:Great work
750:with their
104:visual edit
603:verifiable
522:Assessment
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
720:edit wars
363:Changed.
340:Tweaked.
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
738:contain
736:Does it
532:WP:WIAGA
166:Comments
157:contribs
76:Criteria
793:Overall
722:, etc:
691:neutral
576:fiction
127:history
108:history
94:Article
808:Nick-D
754:, and
748:tagged
740:images
713:stable
711:Is it
688:Is it
655:Is it
596:Is it
578:, and
568:layout
539:Is it
486:Nick-D
436:Nick-D
417:Nick-D
297:Nick-D
147:Nick-D
580:lists
481:These
136:Watch
16:<
812:talk
600:and
564:lead
504:talk
490:talk
472:talk
458:talk
440:talk
421:talk
407:talk
388:talk
369:talk
346:talk
327:talk
301:talk
287:talk
265:talk
246:talk
227:talk
207:talk
184:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
718:No
637:C.
609:A.
560:MoS
558:B.
814:)
795::
778::
762::
715:?
694:?
659:?
641::
613::
606:?
582::
574:,
570:,
566:,
543:?
528:GA
506:)
492:)
474:)
460:)
442:)
423:)
409:)
390:)
371:)
348:)
329:)
303:)
289:)
267:)
248:)
229:)
209:)
186:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
810:(
502:(
488:(
470:(
456:(
438:(
419:(
405:(
386:(
367:(
344:(
325:(
299:(
285:(
263:(
244:(
225:(
205:(
182:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.