Talk:Hyderabad State - Knowledge (XXG)

1430:. If both of you are actually editing in good faith, respond to the changes by making your own refinements (instead of demanding changes from me). Because there was a desire expressed by NeilN to see more quoted text to avoid alleged pov issues, I have concentrated on providing those quotes ("some women" reword issue now moot). As an expression of good faith, I have even removed the "brutally" wording. However,there remains an onus is on the both of you to propose changes by making your own edits (while explaining on summary or here on talk)--rather than reverting mine and dictatorially demanding vague changes. Bear in mind, this issue has already been brought to the notice of admins by you guys, so your willingness to collaborate will be watched by others. 4396:

state of emergency, and sent its troops into Hyderabad State. During the ‘police action’, the Indian Army entered Hyderabad with the objective of forcing the Nizam to re-install Indian troops in Secunderabad to allow them to restore order in the state. The Nizam surrendered in four days, and the Government of India appointed Major-General J.N. Chaudhuri as Military Governor. Delhi decided that the Nizam could retain his position as Rajpramukh, though law-making and enforcement power rested with the Military Governor" This is on page 9 and ignoring the fact that it was a forced annexation (clearly it was forced as the main article

791:

information. Please do not engage in edit warring simply to skew the article to your preferred version. Detailed explanations are required to arrive at a consensus version so that reader can properly understand all associated historical events with this article. You cannot understand the allegations of executions of razakars and other communal violence without having a paragraph on the razakar atrocities that initiated the communal violence to being with. Rather than one line drive by sentences, please provide detailed explanations in the future so that a consensus can be reached.

3403:(4.) The expression "British India" shall mean all territories and places within Her Majesty's dominions which are for the time being governed by Her Majesty through the Governor-General of India or through any governor or other officer subordinate to the Governor-General of India. (5.) The expression "India" shall mean British India together with any territories of any native prince or chief under the suzerainty of Her Majesty exercised through the Governor-General of India, or through any governor or other officer subordinate to the Governor-General of India. 31: 1237:. You and abecedare mischaracterized my good faith reword as a 3RR breach (the one word I changed is crucial). Second, you clearly need to read and understand wikipedia's bold editing policy. You have to make the changes to the text to show me what you want. You can't dictate a subjective standard--so either show me what you think the text should look like or your actions will be considered disruptive editing. Here's text from the BRD policy Abecedare himself cited: 3678:"Almost nobody, nobody in English language readers knows what a "Nizamate" is." That's a bold and generalised comment. I'm sure many have not heard of terms such as "khanate" or "khaganate" either. Nevertheless, a territory ruled by a Khanate is known as such. Likewise, a territory controlled by a Nizam would be called a Nizamate. In any case, if you can think of a better term then please add it but leaving princely state in there unqualified is incorrect. 854:. If you have not researched the topic and have no understanding of it, do not attempt to cite wikipolicy you don't understand. Section blanking is vandalism--particularly when you don't respond with a detailed explanation when requested. Abecedare has listed a concern that I responded to by rewording text. If you have a problem with the original quote, you have to do research and discuss--you can't hold content hostage merely because you don't like it. 265: 717:

language not considered NPOV, while keeping core--referenced/verified--substance. Blanket removing content is indicative of a desire to skew the article. Furthermore, there is nothing even remotely non-NPOV about "preceding MIM/Razakar atrocities" when this is well known and was referenced in my edit. Please do not attempt to blank out sections of the article to tailor a desired image of the event. Knowledge (XXG) must be NPOV. Thank you.

289: 991:

victims in the conflict--this is pov-pushing as well. Even your concerns about "straight line action" are touched on by the skewed bbc article, which conceded the "pretext" of preceding razakar atrocity. I am however glad that you wish to discuss. Rather than hold content hostage--let us do what wikipedia intends--collaborate on the edit--so feel free to edit my version and we'll work together to reach consensus.

82: 64: 3928:. External links should point to further research that expand on the topic or to material that should be in the article but cannot be included because of copyright reasons. The material you're adding does not fit either of those criteria. Perhaps, assuming it is a reliable source, you could add it - as a reference - in a section on the Nizam's relations with his subjects. But not as an external link. -- 241: 163: 128: 22: 173: 4430:

this point you know better. I am sure more neutral editors could also contribute as I feel some are still attached to some nationalistic narrative surrounding this annexation which for long they tried to term as "integration" you dont end up with hundreds and thousands of dead for no reason a military invasion which is always forced results in these fatalities.

325: 3332:

the balkanization reference is not in the context of Hyderabad at all (see page 219). The annexation of Hyderabad is barely mentioned in the book (except to say that the Nizam was a holdout - naively according to Metcalf - see page 224). When challenged, you need to resort to specific quotes with specific page references so that they can be verified. --

3533: 2446:, not citations. So you need to make an honest effort to verify the content before you decide to delete it as being unsourced. For example, when there are wikilinks to other related articles, you need to check there for the sources. At the moment, there is probably no great harm in your deletions, because there was probably plenty of 1375: 1016: 2783:

the Hong Kong-based Peregrine Investment Holdings. This is clearly one of those common lapses of memory and has nothing to do with the fact that Peregrine went spectacularly bust in 1998 with estimated debts of $ 400 million (Pike had been Chairman of Peregrine India and a director of Pergerine Asset Management from 1993-97).

1005:"To face this challenge from the people, the Nizam encouraged the Razakars to terrorise the Hindus and also to change the communal complexion of the State by forcibly converting Hindus into Islam and inviting Muslims from outside to settle in the State." Rao, P.R. "History and Culture of Andhra Pradesh". p.281-282. 4395:

Seems like cherry picking sentences from Sherman Taylors reference is acceptable however as soon something is added which is already in the source which does not go with the justifications of the annexation its regarded as unsourced "On 13 September 1948, therefore, the Government of India declared a

3728:

that said something like "While commonly referred to as a princely state, this is actually wrong, it should be referred to as a Nizamate because...". We don't just accept passing or trivial mentions on Knowledge (XXG), because with the Internet, it's easy to search through 1 million sources and find

3715:

You don't seem to understand how Knowledge (XXG) works. You don't get to just declare that princely state is "incorrect" when there are hundreds of sources that do in fact refer to Hyderabad as a princely state. And yes, per my edit summary, your "reference" isn't useful here - nobody is contesting

805:

I have listed the exact terms in my first post. I have no interest in this topic beyond making sure edits comply with Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines which, in my opinion, yours fails to do. Reword the terms I mentioned or attribute them properly and I'll be satisfied (and ignore your blatant

400:

The information here focuses on trivialities and emphasizes some things (communist & muslim militias) that have very little to do with the actual transition. I strongly suggest seeking out and referencing non-Indian sources of information on this transition to avoid local bias (as feelings still

3805:

Actually, there is nothing in the term "princely state" that suggests that it is supposed to be under British suzerainty. The British used that term for any state ruled by a prince, which they didn't think qualified to be called a "kingdom". There were certainly "kingdoms", even "empires", that were

3733:

shows Hyderabad State being referred to as a Princely State, if it makes you happy. (I don't actually place much weight on this "reference" at all, but it's still better than your reference, because at least this book is specifically on the topic - and has 0 occurrences of "nizamate", by the way.)

2197:

sources is that they can be used with care, for factual information, especially when supported by secondary sources. Whether the Nizam signed accession or not is an issue of fact, and not any "POV". I am afraid yours is the only "POV" here, which is entirely irrelevant to what goes into the article.

2154:

Textbooks are not exactly the most desirable source for an issue like this. Especially one which has been universally trashed by readers for distorting history and presenting the view of an historian. Furthermore I have not read anywhere that the Nizam signed a succession the state was annexed hence

1444:

Just saw this edit and conversation today. I found the new changes to introduce some POV to some areas while POV was taken out of others. I would generally avoid words like "horrendous" and "patriotic" as they are used more often in political opinion literature instead of fact descriptions. I would

1004:

to allay your concern. The actual numbers of raped women are more than a few or "some". These ambiguities are the result of unavailable statistics. At the same time, it is important to recognize the scale of the atrocities that were taking place in hyderabad prior to its liberation. See for example:

4429:

Are you now denying that it wasn't an annexation ? Please just read the main article on the annexation and yes sending in troops to invade Hyderabad state to force the nizam is a method to achieve annexation the main article itself is called "Indian annexation of Hyderabad" why are you even arguing

4065:

so we can codify this? I suspect that Raj era sources might be RS for train wrecks & bureaucratic promotions, but prohibited when colonizer or oppressor points-of-view are concerned. I might be stating the obvious to some here, but not everyone, myself included, has a clue of what qualifies for

3971:

I reverted your Turkoman addition because the source you're using is a Raj era source. The consensus in India articles is that Raj era sources for ethnic identites are not reliable and should not be used. If need to find a recent academic source that supports the Turkoman identity. Please also read

2782:

The book describes its author, Francis Pike as a "historian" although it's not easy turning up any previous works by the 55-year-old author. Surprisingly, for someone who is presumably concerned with accuracy, the blurb omits Pike's unfortunate involvement with what was one of Asia's largest banks:

2532:

All the four scripts were present in previous versions of the page. All the four languages were administrative languages. Nizam government ran Telugu, Marathi and Kannada medium schools. All the records at my home before 1948 are in Marathi. What is the problem of all the four languages are present

2354:

First, I agree that consensus is not a numbers game, but that doesn't obviate the problem of reaching for a "consensus" where none exists. (Israel-Palestine is another area that comes to mind.) I would be happier if we could find books by for example, Japanese, Korean, or Brazilian scholars, but so

2321:

I have consulted a number of sources, and am gathering another, a recent book, all of which refer to Operation Polo as an invasion, and India's motivation and action as an annexation. Hence my question, how many sources before we declare the terms "invasion" and "annexation" acceptable? I find this

1796:

I have a strong suspicion that the above user is the same user who had issues way back in 2013 with the article. He is adding primary sources (v.p menon was the mastermind behind the annexation of the state) and blogs to push a very pro Indian point of view of events can someone protect the page at

1764:

Please state exactly what the sources say, not your own interpretation. This source does not say that he "declared independence." It says he became "independent in fact, though not in name." In reality, he just became the Viceroy. Pretty soon, the Marathas attacked him and forced him to pay Chauth,

1614:

It's not my claim.... it's history. The Nizam declared independence in 1724 when the Mughal empire was weakening, and then Hyderabad became a princely state under British India in 1803. This is from the wikipedia page, I just added it to the infobox. But thanks for clarifying it. I also noticed the

1181:

instance of blatant POV-pushing to slightly less POV-pushing. Not a great improvement. As I've now stated multiple times, either replace the POV terms, or present them as quotes (xxx stated that "yyy..."). And, as you've breached 3RR, it would be good if you did so on the talk page so as to not add

1052:

As Neil and I have mentioned above, just changing "countless" to "unknown number" or similar tweaks do not resolve the POV issues with your text; both the content and wording of the paragraph need to be overhauled. If you are interested, propose text here, gain consensus, and only then introduce it

589:

should be added which explains the peoples culture under Hyderabad State. If the article is strong enough a separate article "Culture of Hyderabad State" or "Culture of Old Hyderabad" also can be made. Currently, the whole Article explains Hyderabad State only in the view of politics and Geography.

3605:

I have no preference for whether it is termed a successor state, kingdom, sultanate etc. I only think that princely state in the lead should be qualified with a mention that this was its status within the British period only. It's already mentioned in the article that the entity was not a princely

3331:

Hi NzmaAA. You misunderstand Kautilya3's request. You need to provide an exact quote that supports your statement, not a summary in your own words. Merely stating, in your own words, what you think a reference is saying is insufficient. Out of curiosity, I took a look at the Metcalf reference, and

3221:

The view (Indian government government one) that "militant" razarkars were behind Indias invasion of the independent state is one sided and to put it bluntly propaganda to justify its invasion and does not tell the whole story why should only the Indian governments excuses be stated we should also

980:

Abecedare. The kate book says "some" because actual estimates are not available. The selectively leaked sunderlal report (ref'ed in the bbc article) only issued estimated figures for muslim victims in the reprisals, but not hindu victims in the preceding violence. Nevertheless, unlike Neil N, you

4444:

Looking back at your previous comments in regards to the annexation you were still arguing that it was not an annexation which raises a few questions on your judgement. However even Sherman Taylor (which uses mostly Indian sources and Indian government claims and is slanted heavily towards Indias

3651:

the Hyderabad state as a nizamate nor make a big deal about it. The relevance of using such an obscure term isn't clear; yes, it applies to Hyderabad State, no, it isn't a proper introduction. Per Kautilya3, "Mughal successor state" is probably closer if you really don't like "princely state".

3583:"Mughal successor state" is how I would describe Hyderabad was before it became part of the British empire. The term "kingdom" is not used for it. It was an instance of an empire fragmenting into semi-independent feudal estates. In any case, the term is unsourced, as I have pointed out. We follow 2473:

sections which I had used Britannica on had no sources initially, so this is an improvement. In the link that you gave me in your explanation, it asks to go to the next reliable source, and that is what I have done. Anyway, thanks for your input, ill try to get some better references and content.

443:

His weakness for women and the consequent vices have impoverished him and he now lives by selling the bequeathed property in Hyderabad in periodic instalments. Much of his wealth has been lost in giving alimonies and maintenance to his divorced ex-wives. The case of former Miss Turkey Ms. Manolya

2177:

I do not think the man who orchestrated the annexation of the state should be given space here its a primary pov source Kuatilya should know better than this please stick to NPOV I have yet to read a neutral respected source stating that the Nizam signed any document its annexation for a reason.

2104:

An authorless source from FK Publications, a non-notable publisher is added by Kautilya3 to support his POV about accesion of the state. He pushed this same POV using a tourism website earlier. There are better and more reputable sources out there which stop short of Indian occupation and never

990:

Let me reiterate. I am open to rewording--but this is obvious deletion. To demand that the entire paragraph should be removed because you disagree with some words, is an overreach since wikipedia sanctions bold editing. You have also changed the title of the section to one that ignores the hindu

3772:

Your patronising comments aside, if you were actually familiar with Hyderabad State, you would see that it was a princely state from 1794 onwards. It literally says as much in the infobox. And I never claimed it wasn't a princely state, I merely believe that since the term "princely state" only

2536:

I don't think all "previous versions" had four languages. Even if they were, it doesn't matter. Our policy on the inclusion of scripts for political units is clear. Only the official languages or the languages used at the seat of power are included. You claimed that the Hyderabad State had four

1527:

have helped lessen some of the POV issues in the Communal Violence section (attribution; redundancy; unexplained terminology; and excessive and selective quote-mining problems remain). The sourcing in the Communal Violence section (Rao, Kate, BBC) is of pretty poor quality too, especially since

716:

It is neutral language given the accounts of the period. You are welcome to research, to verify, and even to reword, but not section blank--that's vandalism. You didn't do that, you outright reverted (removing referenced content) without touching on the substance. A good faith edit would change

610:

I would appreciate people collecting matter from Genuine websites on traditions, customs of the people of Hyderabad State those days. The Article "Hyderabadi Muslims" signifies the culture from Hyderabad State and New Hyderabad too, But this article on culture should be based on both Hyderabadi

4221:

can help point to the correct link. Regardless of all that, references to historical events should use modern academic sources rather than older sources, especially non-academic ones. Historiography is not static, and if there is anything useful to say about a historical event, surely a modern

2472:

What I mean was that there was a good deal of content which did not have any citations or references that went along with it. That content was deleted and replaced with cited content. In the case of the Britannica content, I had to use this as I had trouble finding better sources. The history

2379:

As for BJP, I haven't seen them make any fuss about the Hyderabad operation. Even if they did, "annexation" would be a perfectly acceptable description as far as they are concerned. For Nehru and Patel, on the other hand, it wouldn't be. So, the BJP is really a red herring in this context. --

3826:

Your edit is confusing things quite a bit because "autonomy" implies being subsidiary. But you don't state what it was subsidiary to. And this supposed "autonomy" covers only part of the period. All said and done, "princely state" is a much better description than any of the alternatives. --

790:

Which terms? "preceding MIM/Razakar atrocities" are npov--they did commit atrocities (i.e. murder, rape, arson, etc). I have provided sources that confirmed this. Also, you still fail to explain why my new paragraph could not have been reworded without being deleted in toto. This was sourced

2222:

not an invasion, one of many that India has carried out against enclaves (see also Goa, for instance)? And in what way was the incorporation of Hyderabad into the Union not an annexation? I don't recall any referendum in Hyderabad, or even passage of an act of union by any Hyderabadi body.

3458:

Yes, I can see that it was used by some people. But to actually mention the term, you need a proper source that explains who used the term and why. Standard scholarly sources don't use it, e.g., Barbara Ramusack. Your claim that is "commonly known as" Hyderabad Deccan is not evidenced. --

1273:

Rather than reverting, try to respond with your own BOLD edit if you can: If you disagree with an edit but can see a way to modify it rather than reverting it, do so. The other disputant may respond with yet another bold edit in an ongoing edit cycle. Avoid the revert stage for as long as

1528:

scholarly sources on the subject are available (except possibly for the Sunderlal report, which may be too recent). Eventually though that section needs to be merged into the "After Indian Independence" section, which too needs additional work to provide more context and less tick-tock.

3414:. When the British were still around, "British India" meant the part of India that was under British administration. But in the common usage now, "British India" is used to distinguish it from independent India. I would like to get input from other editors if this needs correction. -- 2887:

The term country rightly fits, it was independent in its early years, and then partially independent, and then again independent. Princly states were not considered a part of "British India". The term "state" also refers to an independent country. These sources are quite reliable.

3730: 2291:

of the views expressed in reliable sources. I can guarantee that no such consensus exists for "annexation." So I suggest that you give up on this project. A case can be made that "integration" is the term that finds scholarly consensus, the reason why the page has been called

1014:

See also: "From the beginning of 1948 the Razakars had extended their activities from Hyderabad city into the towns and rural areas, murdering hindus, abducting women, pillaging houses and fields, and looting non-muslim property in a widespread reign of terror." p.394.

1563:

from infobox because this article is about Hyderabad state between 1724-1948. writing about 2014 Hyderabad city shared between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh in infobox is not required. I reckon one can find this information under history in Hyderabad city page.

1374:"From the beginning of 1948 the Razakars had extended their activities from Hyderabad city into the towns and rural areas, murdering hindus, abducting women, pillaging houses and fields, and looting non-muslim property in a widespread reign of terror." p.394. 3822:

is occasionally called the "Kingdom of Oudh". I suspect the reason the Nizams never qualified to be "kings" is because they were always dependent on somebody or the other for the sustenance of their power, first the Marathas, then the French and finally the

3168:

The book I referenced is reliable and provides another reason for why India annexed Hyderabad Razarkars were not the only reason and its censorship to try and eliminate other facts due to the nationalistic sentiments of certain users please read this asap.

937:) 02:58, 11 October 2013 (UTC) FWIW, I do think that Hindu-Muslim tensions and violence in Hyderabad prior to the entry of the Indian army merit inclusion in the article. But the material needs to be well-sourced, presented neutrally, and not fall afoul of 2918:

criteria and understand what the sources actually say. The first book is that of Francis Pike, which has already been discussed above in this thread. As for the second source, K. v. Krishna Rao, what does it say to show that Hyderabad was a "country"? --

1964:

I notice that you have added that India annexed Hyderabad to the lead. I am going to revert it. In the first place, the sources given there don't say any such thing. Even assuming we can find sources, that is not enough. Knowledge (XXG) represents the

3291:

Perhaps you are struggling to comprehend basic english. The author of the book states clearly India feared princely states gaining independence which could create "balkanization" hence India invaded in contrast to the Razarkar Indian government line.

2889: 2939:

What exactly is wrong with those sources? And the second source mentions it as a state... a synonym. Princely state refers to those native states that had subsidiary alliances with British India, but how about when it did not? Did it just not exist?

2895: 1117:

I have also been editing long enough to understand when I am faced with editors who have problems with the actual referenced content rather than my rewording. If you want this to go to an admin, fine. But I have demonstrated a desire to collaborate.

1060:

on this page despite prior warnings, and are eligible to be blocked from editing wikipedia. I don't intend to report it this time, but if you continue edit-warring (which need not involve breaches of 3RR) in the coming days instead of following the

2410:

Irrespective of any content disputes for now, I am going to move around the categories so that the layout of the article is not all over the place. As an example, I had combined early history and british raj sections into one large History section.

3731:

https://books.google.com/books?id=Loiq3YrFy40C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Hyderabad+%22princely+state%22&hl=en&ppis=_c&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjQ5cynmpLlAhURWN8KHdGYB7kQ6AEwBHoECAMQAg#v=onepage&q=%22princely%20state%22&f=false

1668:

This is the problem with Mughal successor states. They were virtually independent, but they still needed the token umbrella that the Empire offered. I have changed it to "Mughal successor state," a term that is often used in scholarly sources. -

3435: 1037:

In sum, I am more than happy to collaborate in order to reach a consensus. But let's boldly edit each other's work rather than tie it up in committee. I will make the first gesture by rewording the previous paragraph. Feel free to do the same.

909:

I have removed the text from the article for now, since it was a clear instance of POV. Besides the issues pointed out by Neil above, the text also selectively and misleading quoted from the cited sources. For example while the Kate book says,

1307:

The onus is on you both to refine and modify. So modify it instead of engaging in vague generalities. Unless you have no understanding of this topic, propose your version of text involving the referenced content. Why are you both scared to do

2272:

was an invasion of one sovereign state by another sovereign state? The only question then is whether the incorporation of Hyderabad into India was "assimilation" not "annexation"? How many sources are necessary to use the term "annexation"?

1721:

as a sovereign. After he died in 1748, his heirs quarrelled and went to the British and French companies for help. Whoever was installed was supported by that company. So I barely see 6 years of "independence," that too informally. --

3441: 3399:

India under the British Raj (the "Indian Empire") consisted of two types of territory: British India and the Native states or Princely states. In its Interpretation Act 1889, the British Parliament adopted the following definitions:

4463: 2080:

This doesn't prove that "annex" is wrong. But it does prove that all the people that are so convinced of themselves need to get off their high horse and investigate what the issues are. Just POV pushing doesn't cut it. --

1027:

What we have here is clearly large-scale violence. Even Kate cites hindu refugees in the thousands. There is also at least one documented incident of razakar atrocity resulting in the rape and murder of at least 70 hindu

4460: 2355:

far I haven't found any on the topic of Hyderabad. The problem with your saying that I should present my sources and that then "let us see what they say (and who is saying)" is that the "us" is not well-defined. As for

1740: 2890:

https://books.google.ca/books?id=EKD3AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT347&dq=hyderabad+was+a+country&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwifpeO3tanZAhUK1oMKHb3WAD0Q6AEIRDAF#v=onepage&q=hyderabad%20was%20a%20country&f=false

2896:

https://books.google.ca/books?id=G7xPaJomYsEC&pg=PA40&dq=hyderabad+was+a+country&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwifpeO3tanZAhUK1oMKHb3WAD0Q6AEIVTAI#v=onepage&q=hyderabad%20was%20a%20country&f=false

3567:

Princely state only refers to the British period and was not used in the early years of the state. Wouldn't it be better to reflect this in the lead i.e "the state/kingdom was later a princely state during British

3436:

https://books.google.ca/books?id=YlgoAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=hyderabad+deccan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi4xLKpg6vZAhWn64MKHRuCBBMQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=hyderabad%20deccan&f=false

3642:

HaoJungTar: Almost nobody, nobody in English language readers knows what a "Nizamate" is. It isn't appropriate for the lede. I looked at your references before reverting, and they solely mentioned the term

2441:

I see plenty of sources listed in the Bibliography and Further reading sections. So I am not sure what you mean by "it doesn't have a lot of references". Please note also that the Knowledge (XXG) policy is

4368:

There are many smiliar pages on wikipedia, you must have evidence to clarify such claim, if modern historian dont find it then its only claim, everybody can claim somehting to fit in or glorify their past

1664:

Sorry, the source (Imperial Gazetter) doesn't say anything about 1724. It says that, by the time of his death in 1748, he was "firmly established as a sovereign." There was never any formal declaration of

2426:

Also, this article is currently considered start class, and doesnt have a lot of references for the material. Lets try to find sourced content for the material, and then we can focus on the grammar next.

444:

Onur, the third officially divorced wife of the present 'Nizam', was the toast of Indian tabloids in 2006. She succesfully defended her rights in an Indian Court and won a judgement against the 'Nizam'.

3442:

https://books.google.ca/books?id=sZKHDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA217&dq=hyderabad+deccan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi4xLKpg6vZAhWn64MKHRuCBBMQ6AEITDAI#v=onepage&q=hyderabad%20deccan&f=false

470:

The Indian government, in a deft act of political maturity and statesmanship, appointed the humbled and mellowed Nizam as the Rajpramukh(Governor) of Hyderabad, a title which he retained till 1956.

3993:

Whats the problem there are source before raj era in 1819 that says state of hyderabad s ruling dynasty is of turkoman origin and there are source that says the founder is Turkic sunni nobleman.

1861: 1827: 1798: 4320:

Sorry but Thats dont make them a siqqiqui or what that is, you use bad sources seems ok for everybudy here, but when l have a source it is not agreed, my last source on Qamuraddin khan is Good

1948: 1934: 2155:

why the Indian army invaded however due to nationalist POV by Kautilya the word annexed was removed there is no other way to describe this article but its pure pro-Indian propaganda at best.

4632: 3217:

The book states that Indian feared a hostile independent state in the middle of the country and that further states may follow and it wanted to avoid the balkanization of princely states.

1445:

edit some fixes in (instead of making recommendations) if I had knowledge of the event, but I am not nearly enough of a scholar of Hyderabadi history to know if the sources are reliable.

3791:

And Nizamate was never a major point of contention for me. Merely an alternative to princely state (which covers the British period only). I have removed it in place of autonomous state.

4459:

Here as some neutral sources which refer to Indias invasion as a annexation (Please not I am not great with adding books as a source so I will just copy and paste the web link and page

1742:

The Nizam declared independence in 1724 after a weakening Mughal empire. I can't really find any info, on when Hyderabad became a princely state of the British. Is 1798 a correct year?

509:

I am removing the rubbish saying that Telugu has prospered and Urdu is no longer spoken in Hyderabad today. Does someone actually believe that Urdu is no longer spoken in Hyderabad?

3027:

one gives no context as to why it was a country but just mentions it as such). Seeing the inconclusive discussion above and the quality of the sources this should be removed for now.

4567: 4652: 4612: 1826:

Dear Indian pov pushers there is a thing called talk page look back at previous discussion many pov pushers have tried to push a pro Indian spin on things before thats why I know.

4180: 4135:. Also, I suggest losing the snarky commentary. Citations provide currency & purchase here, not opinions. Supply verification from reliable sources & you will find that 4039: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4226:, particularly the easy to follow "nutshell" section. Neither an 1893 "India office and Burma office list" nor the 1911 Britannica satsify the two requirements listed there. -- 3019:

I don't see any consensus here that Hyderabad be described as a country but it currently is in the article. The sources used are the same as above and don't seem reliable (the

3313:

clearly refers to it as an annexation but in the parallel universe in which this article exists its called "integration"or "assimilation" laughable if it were not so tragic.

4499:

to his own views, claiming that the source was "difficult" to access. How he knew that Razakars were not "cited" in the source without even accessing it, I have no idea. --

3438: 646:

This page is related to Hyderabad State as it existed prior to disintegration and merger into Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh. We should just have a reference to

611:

Hindus and Muslims only from the era of "Hyderabad State". The article should be neutral based on common mans culture and free from political culture and political history.

1973:. So, unless a great majority of the sources use the term "annex" we can't use it. Here are a few sources that I consider reliable and important, and none of them use it: 3024: 3020: 4597: 3109: 3105: 3091: 2638: 2634: 2620: 94: 1865: 1831: 1802: 2773:

is not good enough. The author is unknown and I couldn't find any book reviews for it, despite it being a 700-page work labelled "history". The Evening Standard News

4520:

Hyderabad's location in the middle of the Indian union, as well as its diverse cultural heritage, was a driving force behind India's annexation of the state in 1948.

4627: 2450:

mixed in with verifiable content, and one can write new content based on good sources. However, Encyclopedia Britannica is not a great source. It is first of all a

2322:

BJP whitewashing of Nehru and Patel rather tiresome, but that aside, how do we establish a "consensus" when none exists, and in its absence, whose words do we use?

279: 93:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please 4557: 4582: 1163:--I am well within my rights to change this text. The onus is on you both to do your own research and provide a knowledgeable counter point for me to respond to. 941:

guidelines by drawing a straight line between the actions of Razakars and the actions of the Indian army (unless scholarly consensus supports such a conclusion).

2140:

Sure, I can find better sources for you if you ask me nicely. But, aggressive content-deletion and edit-warring won't buy you any cooperation from any one. --

4637: 3434:

The citizens of the state referred to the nation as "Hyderabad deccan", also present in the name of the Hyderabad Deccan railway station in Hyderabad city.

4552: 4524:

This barely makes sense. Nothing about the Razakars, the Nizam's atrocities, the Communist-led rebellion etc. I will rewrite the lead in a couple of weeks.

868:

You're not presenting the highly-POV statements as quotes, you're presenting them in Knowledge (XXG)'s voice. And if you think my edits are vandalism, then

693:"brutally put down", "committed horrendous atrocities", "Countless Hindu", "preceding MIM/Razakar atrocities" is the exact opposite of neutral language. -- 4647: 4607: 3716:

that Hyderabad State can be referred to as a nizamate, but your reference is on a completely different topic and happens to just refer to it as a nizamate

303: 255: 2359:, a) it is not a policy, and b) I had not thought of my remark as being directed at you personally, though I probably should have, for which I apologise. 35: 4572: 1155:

rather than speak in vague terms. You two don't own this page, so either collaborate, or I myself will report you both and take this to the next level.

340: 2238:

If this was a genuine question, I would be glad to answer it. Since it is merely rhetorical, I suggest that you see my discussion above in the section

2059:

Muralidharan, Sukumar (2014). "Alternate Histories: Hyderabad 1948 Compels a Fresh Evaluation of the Theology of India's Independence and Partition".

1902:

introduced the phrasing that India "were determined to assimilate Hyderabad into the Indian Union, even if it were by compulsion." No citations. And,

552:

You fellows Hyderabadi Muslims speak Urdu and Others(Hindus,Christians,etc) speak telugu. Some malayalis are too there(in the city and secunderabad)--

2373:

The "us" is always the collection of involved editors on the page, in the first place. If that is not enough, we can use an RfC to get wider opinion.

1147:

You explained your issue with my wording (which I changed the wording and which editors can plainly see), but not the actual quotes from my sources.

231: 89: 69: 4622: 4577: 3077: 2810:

I thought it was a reliable source. But I can still look. But its also common sense, Hyderabad was an independent state, meaning it was a country.

1498:

said. Also, attributing quotes does not mean putting quotes around text and adding a reference. It means (as I stated above) writing something like

4400:

itself describes it as a military intervention) I will be restoring the sentence as censoring this information is not what Knowledge (XXG) is for.

531:

Where is Tamil spoken anywhere in the erstwhile areas of Hyderabad State ? Only Telugu, Marathi, Urdu ( Dakhini Dialect ) and Kannada are spoken.

4657: 4617: 4562: 3067: 274: 142: 1341:

To move things along, I will now provide the text in quotes, and edit the page with the new content. This is brand new content I will be adding:

4592: 4222:

academic source can be found that says just that. I suggest that Loveisthebest1, since they seem to be interested in historical articles, read

1120:

If you have issues with the text--propose changes--don't hold mine hostage until you are miraculously satisfied under some subjective standard.

221: 450:

I don't know much about this, but such a statement needs to be first referenced, and section written in a Nuetral point of view. Regards, --

3497: 3005: 408: 1772:

In 1798, according to the Benichou book, Nizam signed subsidiary alliance with Wellesley. That means he came under British Paramountcy. --

3439:

https://books.google.ca/books?id=z_r7QwAACAAJ&dq=hyderabad+deccan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi4xLKpg6vZAhWn64MKHRuCBBMQ6AEIQjAF

2606: 359:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see 4662: 4642: 4602: 2179: 2156: 538: 482: 4156:. Please note that there are a few reliable sources there & most are not. If you have not done so already, verse yourself at the 1952: 1938: 298: 250: 146: 138: 3902: 3087:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2616:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

516: 872:

is the way to go. Be prepared to get shot down rather quickly, though. Much better if you suggest NPOV text here on the talk page

2336:

As you well know, consensus is not a numbers game. Please present your sources, and let us see what they say (and who is saying).

2510:. Your latest claim is that the state had four official languages. Please provide reliable sources saying so, or self-revert. -- 2307:. So, like I said earlier, you need to get off your high horse and consult the reliable sources to find out what is going on. -- 4587: 4547: 3515:

Before 1858, it's dealing with the East India Company. The Raj is what it's replacement - direct British rule - is known as.

2293: 3777:

Please don't misrepresent me in the future. You seem more keen on entering into an argument as opposed to resolving the issue.

2356: 44: 4397: 2028: 3410:

Technically, you are correct. In fact, if you click on the blue link to "British India" in the infobox, it leads you to the

196: 186: 133: 3883: 2744:

As I said in the edit summary, you need to provide a reliable source, in fact multiple sources, as counts as a contentious

630: 4157: 2774: 4302:

The Asaf Jah dynasty of Hyderabad state claimed Siqqiqui lineage. So, it would not be correct to label them as "Turkic"

3152: 2681: 1157:

Again, I am giving you both one more chance to provide your own references to discuss this topic to reach a neutral text

4445:

narrative) also calls it an invasion and seizure of territory by the Indian military I can post the quote if you want.

4415:

Forcing to re-install troops doesn't amount to "annexation". The term "annexation" is not even used in this source. --

3729:

the 2 that correspond to whatever crazy view is being proposed. By your own standards of a random Google Book search,

3652:(Which, by the standard you're using for Nizamate, has like 10000x as many passing references to "princely state."). 336: 4165: 4144: 2287:

I don't agree with anything, but that is not the point. Going by policy, Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to reflect the

2855: 2815: 2734: 2376:

The nationality of the scholars doesn't matter to me. What matters is how well they have examined all the evidence.

1947:

Assimilate is blatant pov. Annexation is the correct term since India was the invading force into another country.

1079:

I have reported him (before I saw this) as he's been editing Knowledge (XXG) long enough to know not to do this. --

3078:

https://web.archive.org/web/20070613204008/http://archnet.org/library/documents/one-document.tcl?document_id=9308

2120: 2002:"The integration of the princely state of Hyderabad and the making of the postcolonial state in India, 1948 - 56" 412: 4035: 3773:

covers the British period, then that should be reflected in the lead. It literally says as much in the article;

3108:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2864:

That is what you say. But you can't call it "obvious". It needs to be attested by multiple reliable sources. --

2637:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

929:, gain consensus for inclusion, and only then add it to the article. Simply edit-warring is not an alternative. 4374: 4325: 4292: 4258: 4099: 4085: 3998: 3364:

The audio pronunciation provided is in a presumably Telugu accent, not indicative of the native pronunciation.

3068:

https://web.archive.org/web/20131220113947/http://www.aponline.gov.in/quick%20links/hist-cult/history_post.html

2572: 2001: 1846:. Whatever changes have been made since then, please discuss them here first and obtain consensus for them. -- 501:

With reference to Jeff's "references needed", I would like to point out that I have added relevant references.

2105:

mention accesion. I am adding POV tag until this is corrected and supported by a source from a renown source.

50: 3081: 486: 3448: 3369: 3143: 3059: 2953: 2945: 2902: 2672: 2598: 2183: 2160: 1933:

Yes the article is full of pro-Indian pov please do clean it up it presents the invading Indians as angels.

1747: 1654: 1620: 571: 542: 4184: 3896: 2337: 618: 534: 520: 512: 478: 404: 4529: 3055: 2729:

Hyderabad was a former country, as well as princely state, and should be included in the intro paragraph.

1978: 1435: 1399: 1168: 1043: 859: 796: 727: 4470: 4450: 4435: 4405: 4347: 4307: 4232: 3982: 3934: 3411: 3338: 3127:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3115: 2851: 2811: 2764: 2730: 2715: 2701: 2656:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2644: 1878:

I have protected the article for two days due to the content dispute. Work it out on this page, please.

3276:

Perhaps you answered it in your first line. The book doesn't say it. Please provide an exact quote. --

3071: 3058:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2607:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090112003648/http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/fline/fl1805/18051140.htm

2597:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2451: 2299:

Now, "invasion" is a factual situation in the sense that armed forces were sent into a territory. Even

3892: 2963:"State" and "country" are not synonyms. Please use the terms that the sources use without adding your 3796: 3782: 3683: 3625: 3611: 3573: 2499: 2364: 2327: 2304: 2278: 2228: 2106: 3196: 2538: 2194: 352: 21: 4504: 4420: 4370: 4321: 4288: 4277: 4254: 4126: 4095: 4081: 3994: 3966: 3832: 3596: 3545: 3520: 3464: 3419: 3384: 3281: 3267: 3208: 2972: 2924: 2869: 2834: 2793: 2753: 2568: 2546: 2515: 2478: 2463: 2432: 2416: 2385: 2345: 2312: 2259: 2203: 2145: 2086: 1923: 1851: 1817: 1777: 1727: 1692: 1674: 1639: 1598: 1536: 1070: 946: 934: 670: 651: 460:

Have specifically added the POV tag to the After the British Rag section, for statements such as: "

4269: 4223: 4136: 4132: 3190: 2455: 2303:

are called invasions, but they don't constitute an "invasion of France." Rather, they represent a

622: 4492: 4196: 4071: 3743: 3657: 3444: 3365: 3032: 2949: 2941: 2898: 2454:

source, and most of its articles and unsigned and unverifiable. It doesn't meet the criteria for

2038: 1990: 1883: 1743: 1688: 1650: 1616: 1593:

needs a reliable source. Certainly "Nizam-ul-Mulk" doesn't indicate any form of independence. --

1585: 655: 567: 566:

I didn't put that in, but Tamil was spoken in Hyderabad state, when the Nizam ruled the Carnatic.

557: 3112:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2745: 2641:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3128: 2657: 2610: 1634:

to say that it was "independent." Otherwise it is unsourced and your edit will be reverted. --

1235:

And with that, you just undercut your own argument here and on your Admin noticeboard complaint

925:

I would suggest that Devanampriya or others propose properly sourced and neutrally worded text

4525: 4342:

If claiming ancestry did not make them as such; them I don't know what else would make them.

3950: 3910: 3848: 3494: 3002: 2996: 2948:) 18:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC) This article is also under the former countries wiki project. 2300: 2025: 1453: 1431: 1395: 1164: 1039: 855: 792: 723: 626: 4062: 3588: 3488: 2247: 1970: 1918:

and POV-pushing, probably spread all over the article. I am going to do a major clean-up. --

852:

Simply rewording or providing new suggestions would be demonstrative of desire to collaborate

807: 4466: 4446: 4431: 4401: 4343: 4303: 4227: 4013: 3977: 3929: 3333: 3318: 3297: 3245: 3227: 3174: 2711: 2697: 2068: 1700: 647: 4061:

scattered through the archives. If there has been no RfC, would you please open one at the

4019: 3973: 3735: 3135: 2664: 1183: 1062: 1057: 869: 264: 3792: 3778: 3710: 3679: 3621: 3607: 3569: 3051: 2590: 2360: 2323: 2274: 2224: 2051: 1524: 1514: 1198: 1091: 968: 888: 822: 753: 705: 684: 356: 3721: 3511:

The section starting "In 1798, Nizam ʿĀlī Khan" and ending with the mutiny isn't the Raj.

2964: 2915: 2447: 2251: 2243: 1915: 1631: 938: 3884:

https://archive.siasat.com/news/nizam-vii-took-care-people-despite-being-monarch-198446/

4500: 4416: 4273: 3828: 3815: 3807: 3774: 3592: 3562: 3541: 3516: 3460: 3415: 3380: 3310:

Its a sorry state of affairs when the parent article about the annexation of Hyderabad

3277: 3263: 3204: 3094:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2968: 2936: 2920: 2884: 2865: 2845: 2830: 2805: 2789: 2749: 2623:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2542: 2527: 2511: 2474: 2459: 2428: 2412: 2381: 2341: 2308: 2269: 2255: 2219: 2199: 2141: 2082: 1919: 1847: 1813: 1812:

How exactly do you know what happened in 2013? You have been here for barely a day. --

1773: 1723: 1684: 1670: 1635: 1609: 1594: 1569: 1558: 1532: 1066: 942: 930: 666: 389: 3584: 3134:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3101: 2663:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2630: 2443: 288: 4541: 4208: 4192: 4067: 3739: 3653: 3028: 2239: 1879: 553: 451: 4049: 3946: 3923: 3906: 3844: 2564: 1491: 1446: 650:

for present day city. Let me know for any objections before removing that section.

431: 178: 1649:

ahhhh, got it. Sorry for the late response. I have a source, and I'll add it in.

922:'women became victims of rape...'" (emphasis added). This is blatant POV pushing. 4216: 3811: 3314: 3293: 3241: 3223: 3170: 1696: 876:

since you have editors who feel your current addition clearly has POV issues. --

81: 63: 4080:

Please you can find also, few source say turkoman origin of the founder/rulers

3540:. As a registered editor, you are perfectly able to do such edits yourself. -- 1531:

I'll try to rework the two sections in the coming week to address these issues.

3396:

Princely states were not considered a part of British India. Please correct.

3100:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2696:

There are duplicates of sections "References" and "Bibliography;" please fix.

2629:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1766: 1718: 1503: 1187: 1080: 957: 877: 850:

You have been removing sourced content without rewording text outside quotes.

811: 742: 694: 462:

the brits very cunningly left the choice of unification with the local rulers.

240: 168: 3311: 2072: 4045:

It would be good to have in one place a general list of the suspect sources.

1565: 1554: 162: 127: 3082:

http://www.archnet.org/library/documents/one-document.tcl?document_id=9308

1615:

point in this wikipedia page doesn't have those sources, but I'll add it.

4533: 4508: 4474: 4454: 4439: 4424: 4409: 4378: 4351: 4329: 4311: 4296: 4281: 4262: 4237: 4200: 4103: 4089: 4075: 4002: 3987: 3954: 3939: 3914: 3852: 3836: 3800: 3786: 3747: 3687: 3661: 3629: 3615: 3600: 3577: 3549: 3524: 3468: 3452: 3423: 3373: 3343: 3322: 3301: 3285: 3271: 3249: 3231: 3212: 3178: 3157: 3036: 2976: 2957: 2928: 2906: 2873: 2859: 2838: 2819: 2797: 2757: 2738: 2719: 2705: 2686: 2576: 2550: 2519: 2482: 2467: 2436: 2420: 2389: 2368: 2349: 2331: 2316: 2282: 2263: 2232: 2207: 2187: 2164: 2149: 2128: 2090: 1956: 1942: 1927: 1886: 1869: 1855: 1835: 1821: 1806: 1781: 1751: 1731: 1704: 1678: 1658: 1643: 1624: 1602: 1573: 1540: 1517: 1460: 1439: 1403: 1201: 1172: 1094: 1074: 1047: 971: 950: 891: 863: 825: 800: 756: 731: 708: 674: 659: 634: 575: 561: 546: 524: 490: 454: 416: 2826: 1993: 741:

These terms are not appropriate to use with Knowledge (XXG)'s voice. --

3905:), please explain why its not considered, I'm trying to understand... 3379:

You mean to say that the Telugus are not the natives of Hyderabad? --

1711: 3072:

http://www.aponline.gov.in/quick%20links/hist-cult/history_post.html

194:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 4040:

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 312#RfC: Xinhua News Agency

382:

People's movement within Hyderabad state for unification with India

4491:

of the lead, based on the sources cited. A disruptive sock called

191: 4191:

why I want to see an RfC to codify what is or is not acceptable.

4187:, although I suppose it could be contested as "Raj era". This is 2998:

Empires at War: A Short History of Modern Asia Since World War II

2240:

Talk:Hyderabad State#Determined - to "assimilate", nay to "annex"

4181:

wikisource:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Hyderabad (native state)

3819: 1695:? LoL! Nizam was indeed toeing the Company's line from 1760s. -- 1002:

will change my original wording from Countless to unknown number

3889:

The Nizam used to call Muslims and the Hindus as his two eyes.

2914:

Please don't give me random google hits. You need to check the

4465:

note none of these are government associated and are neutral.

2533:

on the page? Even the Hyderabadi rupee had all for languages.

1717:

The best I can gather is that in 1742, the British recognised

319: 15: 4048:

It would be good to know for what purposes these sources are

3023:

one mentions even old kingdoms of India as "countries", the

2829:

before calling it obvious that something is a "country". --

2611:

http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/fline/fl1805/18051140.htm

1149:

What is the problem with that? How can this be "overhauled"?

287: 263: 239: 3260:

What does the book say and how does it support your content

3222:

add the view of neutral scholars to show both perspectives

4024:

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 220#Daily Mail RfC

3620:

As it was ruled by a Nizam, would Nizamate be appropriate?

3406:

Interpretation Act 1889 (52 & 53 Vict. c. 63), s. 18

3199:. What exactly does the book say, and how does it support 3062:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2601:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2340:

about BJP don't help. So I suggest you leave them out. --

4028:

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 303#RfC: Fox News

981:

appear to be interested in discussion, so let's discuss.

4496: 4488: 4058: 4057:

I, myself, was unable to find an RfC, although I found

3200: 2770: 2594: 2508: 2505: 2504:

You have been edit-warring over scripts in the infobox

1903: 1899: 1843: 1591: 1487: 1427: 915: 364: 360: 331: 3591:

in our use of language and do not make up our own. --

190:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 4213:. Raj era sources were discussed on RSN a while ago ( 2710:

Also, duplicate of section "External Links" present.

4032:

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 334#Mashable

3163:

Attempted censorship for reason of Indias annexation

2022:

October Coup, A Memoir of the Struggle for Hyderabad

1630:

Whatever you want to call it, you need to provide a

1590:

Your claim of Hyderabad as an "independent kingdom"

4151:/search?&q=Turkoman+Hyderabad+-site%3Awikipedia 3843:Agreed (and it was the Mughals first of all, no?). 3104:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2633:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 396:

Transition from princely state to province of India

914:women became victims of rape...", in the article, 437:tag to this page because of statements like this: 385:Role of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Police Action 4633:C-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance 4568:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in History 2565:http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/in-hyder.html 1151:Suggest improvements based on your own research 4253:I don't know which source I are allowed to use 379:Razakar movement and the violence that followed 3090:This message was posted before February 2018. 2619:This message was posted before February 2018. 466:The Razakars, a motley group of Islamic bigots 4653:C-Class Hyderabad articles of High-importance 4613:C-Class Telangana articles of High-importance 4518: 4142:As for sources, please sift your way through 2780: 1981:(January 1950), "Hyderabad: Muslim Tragedy", 8: 2137:Can you show that the FK book is authorless? 1894:Determined - to "assimilate", nay to "annex" 103:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Former countries 2009:Indian economic & social history review 4160:content guideline to learn the difference. 2850:And like I said again, it was a country... 2589:I have just modified one external link on 2134:Can you prove that I added a tourism site? 122: 58: 4558:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in History 4022:on Raj era sources, such as the ones for 3050:I have just modified 2 external links on 4598:C-Class India articles of Low-importance 3720:. What would be appropriate would be a 1428:Here is the diff to my latest refinement 3945:Ok. Thanks , I'll leave it to you here 3493:, Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–, 3479: 2987: 642:Aug 30, 2013 - Remove Hyderabad section 124: 60: 19: 4628:Mid-importance Indian history articles 4553:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles 4287:I have add new source is it approved? 2047: 2036: 1862:2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:D5AA:E7F2:540C:E498 1828:2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:D5AA:E7F2:540C:E498 1799:2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:D5AA:E7F2:540C:E498 1792:POV and primary sources User:CAKrutesh 614:Please discuss with me on this topic 475:The RAZZAKARS had humiliated HINDUS. 4583:WikiProject Former countries articles 3734:This is getting dangerously close to 1949:2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:C841:4298:8132:238 1935:2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:C841:4298:8132:238 590:Culture should include subtopics of 106:Template:WikiProject Former countries 7: 3258:You have not answered the question. 1161:but you have to do your own work too 184:This article is within the scope of 87:This article is within the scope of 4638:WikiProject Indian history articles 4174:_sdt=0%2C5&q=Turkoman+Hyderabad 3490:The Indian Princes and their States 2788:Did you find any other sources? -- 2061:History and Sociology of South Asia 1153:(gaping silence here from you both) 690:(redirected from editor talk page) 49:It is of interest to the following 4648:High-importance Hyderabad articles 4608:High-importance Telangana articles 3724:book, journal, chapter of a book, 2995:Pike, Francis (28 February 2011), 2357:Knowledge (XXG):Casting aspersions 1969:among the reliable sources as per 14: 4573:C-Class vital articles in History 3392:Princely state of "British India" 3054:. Please take a moment to review 2593:. Please take a moment to review 1056:Also note that you have breached 1000:In the interest of good faith, I 206:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 4158:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources 3531: 2825:You need to read the article on 323: 171: 161: 126: 80: 62: 29: 20: 4623:C-Class Indian history articles 4578:C-Class former country articles 4137:Knowledge (XXG) is not censored 3726:on Hyderabad State specifically 2294:Indian integration of Hyderabad 226:This article has been rated as 4658:WikiProject Hyderabad articles 4618:WikiProject Telangana articles 4563:C-Class level-5 vital articles 4398:Indian annexation of Hyderabad 4131:Please learn to indent as per 4042:? I ask this for two reasons: 2390:23:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 2369:22:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 2350:22:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 2332:21:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 2317:21:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 2283:21:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 2264:20:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 2233:20:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 956:Completely agree with this. -- 1: 4593:Low-importance India articles 4534:18:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC) 4509:13:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC) 4183:. This should be okay as per 3738:; please back down on this. 3487:Ramusack, Barbara N. (2004), 3469:19:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 3453:18:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 3424:20:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 3374:03:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 3344:15:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC) 3323:14:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC) 3302:14:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC) 3286:22:51, 14 December 2017 (UTC) 3272:22:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC) 3250:21:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC) 3232:21:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC) 3213:21:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC) 3179:20:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC) 3037:13:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC) 2977:18:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 2958:18:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 2929:09:58, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 2907:02:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 2567:) to confer for future edits. 2250:in mind, refrain from making 1906:changed it to "determined to 1860:This version is much better. 1714:and Sardeshmukhi before that? 675:11:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC) 417:17:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 296:This article is supported by 272:This article is supported by 248:This article is supported by 4475:22:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC) 4455:21:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC) 4440:21:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC) 4425:21:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC) 4410:21:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC) 4063:Reliable sources/Noticeboard 3837:21:35, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3801:17:44, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3787:17:40, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3748:17:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3688:17:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3662:17:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3630:12:12, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3616:12:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3601:11:58, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3578:11:44, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 3158:08:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 2874:08:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC) 2860:23:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC) 2839:20:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 2820:17:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 2798:17:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC) 2758:14:12, 29 October 2017 (UTC) 2739:03:15, 29 October 2017 (UTC) 2577:07:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC) 2551:11:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC) 2520:22:44, 1 November 2016 (UTC) 2268:So I take it you agree that 1541:20:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC) 1518:17:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC) 1461:22:46, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 1440:06:20, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 1404:05:39, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 1202:05:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 1173:05:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 1095:04:58, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 1075:04:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 1048:04:35, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 972:04:20, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 951:03:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 892:05:11, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 864:05:00, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 826:02:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 801:02:11, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 757:01:51, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 732:01:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 709:01:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 547:09:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 275:the Indian history workgroup 90:WikiProject Former countries 3878:External link clarification 2537:official languages. Please 2483:22:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC) 2468:17:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC) 2437:15:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC) 2421:19:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC) 2000:Sherman, Taylor C. (2007). 1842:I have reverted it back to 660:21:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC) 635:09:29, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 525:17:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 4679: 4663:WikiProject India articles 4643:C-Class Hyderabad articles 4603:C-Class Telangana articles 3121:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3047:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2650:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2586:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1574:11:20, 7 August 2014 (UTC) 581:Culture of Hyderabad State 401:run high on this topic). 232:project's importance scale 209:Template:WikiProject India 4059:about a dozen discussions 4020:Request for Comment (RfC) 3955:17:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 3940:19:33, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 3915:15:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 3550:22:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 3525:20:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 2687:05:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC) 2165:11:06, 27 June 2016 (UTC) 2150:19:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC) 2129:18:33, 26 June 2016 (UTC) 2091:20:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC) 1782:16:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC) 1752:15:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC) 1732:08:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC) 1705:05:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC) 1691:So, Mr. Hammad, what was 1679:00:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC) 1659:18:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC) 1122:That's bad faith editing. 576:18:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC) 562:04:24, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 491:12:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 455:01:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 392:05:25, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) 363:; for its talk page, see 295: 271: 247: 225: 156: 75: 57: 4515:Line that makes no sense 4379:14:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 4352:09:17, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 4330:19:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC) 4312:18:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC) 4297:16:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC) 4282:14:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC) 4263:14:17, 25 May 2021 (UTC) 4238:13:36, 25 May 2021 (UTC) 4201:21:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC) 4104:21:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC) 4090:20:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC) 4076:19:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC) 4003:19:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC) 3988:18:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC) 3853:03:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC) 3647:. They certainly don't 3510: 3001:, I.B.Tauris, pp. 347–, 2720:21:40, 15 May 2017 (UTC) 2706:21:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC) 2208:14:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC) 2188:11:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC) 2073:10.1177/2230807514524091 2020:Hyder, Mohammed (2012). 1957:08:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC) 1943:08:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC) 1928:08:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC) 1887:09:56, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 1870:09:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 1856:09:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 1836:09:29, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 1822:09:23, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 1807:08:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 1644:22:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC) 1625:21:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC) 1603:21:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC) 1500:xxx stated that "yyy..." 3043:External links modified 2582:External links modified 2214:Invasion and annexation 1979:Smith, Wilfred Cantwell 1910:", "even if it were by 109:former country articles 4588:C-Class India articles 4548:C-Class vital articles 4522: 2785: 2563:Please see this link ( 1376:Large scale atrocities 1017:Large scale atrocities 773:You are being evasive. 292: 268: 244: 4172:/scholar?hl=en&as 3606:state from 1724-1798. 3412:British Indian Empire 2692:Error in Organization 927:here on the talk page 299:WikiProject Hyderabad 291: 267: 251:WikiProject Telangana 243: 43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 36:level-5 vital article 4205:Thanks for the ping 3240:Page 223 I believe. 3102:regular verification 2631:regular verification 2305:liberation of France 1579:Independent kingdom? 1553:(now shared between 1490:, I agree with what 806:misunderstanding of 606:Art and Architecture 351:. Its contents were 347:with a consensus to 3092:After February 2018 2621:After February 2018 2173:V. P Menon more POV 1983:Middle East Journal 1693:Subsidiary alliance 916:it was presented as 4094:Stop hiding truth 4018:Has there been an 3146:InternetArchiveBot 3097:InternetArchiveBot 2675:InternetArchiveBot 2626:InternetArchiveBot 2493:Official languages 335:was nominated for 293: 269: 245: 45:content assessment 4391:Forced annexation 4236: 3986: 3938: 3806:called so, e.g., 3499:978-1-139-44908-3 3342: 3328: 3255: 3184: 3122: 3007:978-0-85773-029-9 2651: 2301:Normandy landings 1765:according to the 1562: 1496: 1451: 1065:process, I will. 638: 621:comment added by 549: 537:comment added by 527: 515:comment added by 493: 481:comment added by 427:I have added the 419: 407:comment added by 371: 370: 318: 317: 314: 313: 310: 309: 187:WikiProject India 121: 120: 117: 116: 4670: 4489:original version 4230: 4220: 4212: 4176: 4155: 4130: 4017: 3980: 3970: 3932: 3927: 3714: 3566: 3539: 3535: 3534: 3503: 3502: 3484: 3430:Hyderabad Deccan 3336: 3326: 3253: 3194: 3182: 3156: 3147: 3120: 3119: 3098: 3011: 3010: 2992: 2852:RahulRamchandani 2849: 2812:RahulRamchandani 2809: 2768: 2765:RahulRamchandani 2731:RahulRamchandani 2685: 2676: 2649: 2648: 2627: 2531: 2503: 2218:In what way was 2124: 2116: 2113: 2110: 2076: 2055: 2049: 2044: 2042: 2034: 2016: 2006: 1996: 1613: 1589: 1552: 1523:Recent edits by 1510: 1509: 1495: 1492: 1458: 1450: 1447: 1194: 1193: 1087: 1086: 964: 963: 884: 883: 818: 817: 749: 748: 701: 700: 648:Hyderabad, India 637: 615: 532: 510: 497:References added 476: 436: 430: 402: 374:Untitled comment 327: 326: 320: 214: 213: 210: 207: 204: 181: 176: 175: 174: 165: 158: 157: 152: 149: 130: 123: 111: 110: 107: 104: 101: 100:Former countries 95:join the project 84: 77: 76: 70:Former countries 66: 59: 42: 33: 32: 25: 24: 16: 4678: 4677: 4673: 4672: 4671: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4538: 4537: 4517: 4393: 4214: 4206: 4173: 4171: 4169: 4167: 4164: 4152: 4150: 4148: 4146: 4143: 4124: 4036:WP:RSPSCRIPTURE 4011: 3964: 3962: 3960:Raj era sources 3921: 3880: 3708: 3560: 3558: 3532: 3530: 3513: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3500: 3486: 3485: 3481: 3432: 3407: 3394: 3362: 3188: 3165: 3150: 3145: 3113: 3106:have permission 3096: 3060:this simple FaQ 3052:Hyderabad State 3045: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3008: 2994: 2993: 2989: 2843: 2803: 2762: 2727: 2694: 2679: 2674: 2642: 2635:have permission 2625: 2599:this simple FaQ 2591:Hyderabad State 2584: 2561: 2525: 2497: 2495: 2408: 2216: 2175: 2122: 2114: 2111: 2108: 2098: 2058: 2045: 2035: 2031: 2019: 2004: 1999: 1977: 1896: 1794: 1632:reliable source 1607: 1583: 1581: 1551:I have removed 1549: 1525:User:Acad Ronin 1507: 1505: 1493: 1454: 1448: 1191: 1189: 1084: 1082: 1053:to the article. 961: 959: 920:Countless Hindu 881: 879: 815: 813: 746: 744: 698: 696: 688: 685:Hyderabad State 644: 616: 583: 507: 499: 434: 428: 425: 409:201.238.172.147 398: 376: 357:Hyderabad State 345:13 January 2022 324: 304:High-importance 256:High-importance 211: 208: 205: 202: 201: 177: 172: 170: 150: 136: 108: 105: 102: 99: 98: 40: 30: 12: 11: 5: 4676: 4674: 4666: 4665: 4660: 4655: 4650: 4645: 4640: 4635: 4630: 4625: 4620: 4615: 4610: 4605: 4600: 4595: 4590: 4585: 4580: 4575: 4570: 4565: 4560: 4555: 4550: 4540: 4539: 4516: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4392: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4371:Loveisthebest1 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4322:Loveisthebest1 4315: 4314: 4289:Loveisthebest1 4285: 4284: 4255:Loveisthebest1 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4177: 4161: 4140: 4127:Loveisthebest1 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4096:Loveisthebest1 4082:Loveisthebest1 4055: 4054: 4053: 4046: 4006: 4005: 3995:Loveisthebest1 3967:Loveisthebest1 3961: 3958: 3943: 3942: 3887: 3886: 3879: 3876: 3874: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3824: 3816:Maratha Empire 3808:Durrani Empire 3789: 3775:princely state 3759: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3618: 3557: 3556:Princely state 3554: 3553: 3552: 3512: 3509: 3505: 3504: 3498: 3478: 3477: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3431: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3405: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3361: 3360:Pronounciation 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3274: 3235: 3218: 3164: 3161: 3140: 3139: 3132: 3085: 3084: 3076:Added archive 3074: 3066:Added archive 3044: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3013: 3012: 3006: 2986: 2985: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2893: 2892: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2801: 2800: 2786: 2778: 2760: 2726: 2723: 2693: 2690: 2669: 2668: 2661: 2614: 2613: 2605:Added archive 2583: 2580: 2569:Messiaindarain 2560: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2494: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2407: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2377: 2374: 2352: 2297: 2270:Operation Polo 2254:arguments. -- 2242:. Please keep 2220:Operation Polo 2215: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2193:Our policy on 2174: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2138: 2135: 2097: 2094: 2078: 2077: 2067:(2): 119–138. 2056: 2029: 2024:. Roli Books. 2017: 1997: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1895: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1793: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1770: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1735: 1734: 1715: 1682: 1681: 1666: 1647: 1646: 1580: 1577: 1559:Andhra Pradesh 1548: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1529: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1054: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 995: 994: 993: 992: 985: 984: 983: 982: 975: 974: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 721: 720: 719: 718: 687: 682: 680: 678: 677: 643: 640: 608: 607: 604: 601: 598: 595: 582: 579: 530: 506: 503: 498: 495: 459: 448: 447: 424: 421: 397: 394: 387: 386: 383: 380: 375: 372: 369: 368: 343:was closed on 341:The discussion 328: 316: 315: 312: 311: 308: 307: 294: 284: 283: 280:Mid-importance 270: 260: 259: 246: 236: 235: 228:Low-importance 224: 218: 217: 215: 212:India articles 183: 182: 166: 154: 153: 151:Low‑importance 131: 119: 118: 115: 114: 112: 85: 73: 72: 67: 55: 54: 48: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4675: 4664: 4661: 4659: 4656: 4654: 4651: 4649: 4646: 4644: 4641: 4639: 4636: 4634: 4631: 4629: 4626: 4624: 4621: 4619: 4616: 4614: 4611: 4609: 4606: 4604: 4601: 4599: 4596: 4594: 4591: 4589: 4586: 4584: 4581: 4579: 4576: 4574: 4571: 4569: 4566: 4564: 4561: 4559: 4556: 4554: 4551: 4549: 4546: 4545: 4543: 4536: 4535: 4531: 4527: 4521: 4514: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4493:Magichero1234 4490: 4486: 4485: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4464: 4461: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4452: 4448: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4407: 4403: 4399: 4390: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4331: 4327: 4323: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4294: 4290: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4239: 4234: 4229: 4225: 4218: 4210: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4190: 4186: 4185:WP:BRITANNICA 4182: 4179:Also look at 4178: 4175: 4162: 4159: 4154: 4141: 4138: 4134: 4128: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4064: 4060: 4056: 4051: 4047: 4044: 4043: 4041: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4015: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3984: 3979: 3975: 3968: 3959: 3957: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3941: 3936: 3931: 3925: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3901: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3885: 3882: 3881: 3877: 3875: 3854: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3732: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3712: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3650: 3646: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3564: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3538: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3501: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3483: 3480: 3476: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3445:Hammad.511234 3443: 3440: 3437: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3408: 3404: 3401: 3397: 3391: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3366:Hammad.511234 3359: 3345: 3340: 3335: 3330: 3329: 3325: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3307: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3256: 3252: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3238: 3237: 3234: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3219: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3192: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3181: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3162: 3160: 3159: 3154: 3149: 3148: 3137: 3133: 3130: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3117: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3093: 3088: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3048: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3017: 3009: 3004: 3000: 2999: 2991: 2988: 2984: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2950:Hammad.511234 2947: 2943: 2942:Hammad.511234 2938: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2917: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2899:Hammad.511234 2897: 2891: 2886: 2883: 2882: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2847: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2807: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2784: 2779: 2776: 2772: 2766: 2761: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2724: 2722: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2691: 2689: 2688: 2683: 2678: 2677: 2666: 2662: 2659: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2646: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2622: 2617: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2587: 2581: 2579: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2558: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2535: 2534: 2529: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2506: 2501: 2492: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2444:verifiability 2440: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2405: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2378: 2375: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2353: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2338:WP:ASPERSIONS 2335: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2295: 2290: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2271: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2221: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2180:141.241.26.20 2172: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2157:141.241.26.20 2153: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2136: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2118: 2117: 2102: 2101: 2095: 2093: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2057: 2053: 2040: 2032: 2027: 2023: 2018: 2015:(4): 489–516. 2014: 2010: 2003: 1998: 1995: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1972: 1968: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1893: 1888: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1876: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1791: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1768: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1744:Hammad.511234 1741: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1720: 1716: 1713: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1689:Hammad.511234 1686: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1667: 1665:independence. 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1651:Hammad.511234 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1617:Hammad.511234 1611: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1587: 1586:Hammad.511234 1578: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1560: 1556: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1516: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1501: 1497: 1489: 1462: 1459: 1457: 1452: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1377: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1196: 1195: 1185: 1180: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1121: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1003: 999: 998: 997: 996: 989: 988: 987: 986: 979: 978: 977: 976: 973: 970: 969: 966: 965: 955: 954: 953: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 923: 921: 917: 913: 893: 890: 889: 886: 885: 875: 871: 867: 866: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 827: 824: 823: 820: 819: 809: 804: 803: 802: 798: 794: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 758: 755: 754: 751: 750: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 729: 725: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 707: 706: 703: 702: 691: 686: 683: 681: 676: 672: 668: 664: 663: 662: 661: 657: 653: 649: 641: 639: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 612: 605: 602: 599: 596: 593: 592: 591: 588: 580: 578: 577: 573: 569: 568:Hammad.511234 564: 563: 559: 555: 550: 548: 544: 540: 539:124.30.174.15 536: 528: 526: 522: 518: 514: 504: 502: 496: 494: 492: 488: 484: 483:59.98.252.178 480: 473: 471: 467: 463: 457: 456: 453: 445: 440: 439: 438: 433: 422: 420: 418: 414: 410: 406: 395: 393: 391: 384: 381: 378: 377: 373: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 333: 329: 322: 321: 305: 302:(assessed as 301: 300: 290: 286: 285: 281: 278:(assessed as 277: 276: 266: 262: 261: 257: 254:(assessed as 253: 252: 242: 238: 237: 233: 229: 223: 220: 219: 216: 199: 198: 193: 189: 188: 180: 169: 167: 164: 160: 159: 155: 148: 144: 140: 135: 132: 129: 125: 113: 96: 92: 91: 86: 83: 79: 78: 74: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 37: 27: 23: 18: 17: 4526:TrangaBellam 4523: 4519: 4487:Here is the 4394: 4286: 4252: 4188: 3963: 3944: 3899: 3891: 3888: 3873: 3725: 3717: 3648: 3644: 3559: 3536: 3514: 3489: 3482: 3474: 3433: 3402: 3398: 3395: 3363: 3327:blocked sock 3309: 3306: 3290: 3259: 3254:blocked sock 3239: 3236: 3220: 3201:your content 3195:cut out the 3183:blocked sock 3167: 3166: 3144: 3141: 3116:source check 3095: 3089: 3086: 3049: 3046: 2997: 2990: 2982: 2935: 2894: 2802: 2781: 2769:I am afraid 2728: 2709: 2695: 2673: 2670: 2645:source check 2624: 2618: 2615: 2588: 2585: 2562: 2496: 2409: 2288: 2217: 2176: 2121: 2107: 2103: 2100: 2099: 2079: 2064: 2060: 2021: 2012: 2008: 1989:(1): 27–51, 1986: 1982: 1966: 1963: 1911: 1907: 1897: 1844:this version 1795: 1683: 1648: 1606: 1582: 1550: 1513: 1504: 1499: 1485: 1455: 1432:Devanampriya 1396:Devanampriya 1394: 1234: 1197: 1188: 1178: 1177:You changed 1165:Devanampriya 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1119: 1090: 1081: 1040:Devanampriya 1001: 967: 958: 939:no synthesis 926: 924: 919: 911: 908: 887: 878: 873: 856:Devanampriya 851: 821: 812: 793:Devanampriya 752: 743: 724:Devanampriya 722: 704: 695: 692: 689: 679: 645: 617:— Preceding 613: 609: 586: 584: 565: 551: 529: 508: 500: 474: 469: 465: 461: 458: 449: 442: 426: 399: 388: 348: 344: 330: 297: 273: 249: 227: 197:project page 195: 185: 179:India portal 88: 51:WikiProjects 34: 4495:apparently 4467:DavosBarton 4447:DavosBarton 4432:DavosBarton 4402:DavosBarton 4344:Aglrochisat 4304:Aglrochisat 4228:RegentsPark 4014:RegentsPark 3978:RegentsPark 3930:regentspark 3893:regentspark 3812:Sikh Empire 3334:regentspark 2771:this source 2712:Biologicarp 2698:Biologicarp 2452:WP:TERTIARY 1914:." Obvious 665:Good call. 533:—Preceding 517:66.28.8.187 511:—Preceding 477:—Preceding 403:—Preceding 361:its history 4542:Categories 4497:changed it 4153:.org+-wiki 4050:proscribed 3818:etc. Even 3793:HaoJungTar 3779:HaoJungTar 3718:in passing 3711:HaoJungTar 3680:HaoJungTar 3645:in passing 3622:HaoJungTar 3608:HaoJungTar 3570:HaoJungTar 3475:References 3197:WP:SOAPBOX 3153:Report bug 2983:References 2682:Report bug 2539:WP:Proveit 2500:Mayur12025 2361:Acad Ronin 2324:Acad Ronin 2275:Acad Ronin 2225:Acad Ronin 2195:WP:PRIMARY 2030:8174368507 1767:Asaf Jah I 1719:Asaf Jah I 1486:Regarding 1274:possible." 1186:report. -- 600:Traditions 585:A section 4501:Kautilya3 4417:Kautilya3 4274:Kautilya3 4270:WP:HISTRS 4224:WP:HISTRS 4163:Also see 4133:WP:THREAD 3829:Kautilya3 3649:introduce 3593:Kautilya3 3563:Kautilya3 3542:Kautilya3 3517:Ganpati23 3461:Kautilya3 3416:Kautilya3 3381:Kautilya3 3278:Kautilya3 3264:Kautilya3 3205:Kautilya3 3136:this tool 3129:this tool 2969:Kautilya3 2937:Kautilya3 2921:Kautilya3 2885:Kautilya3 2866:Kautilya3 2846:Kautilya3 2831:Kautilya3 2806:Kautilya3 2790:Kautilya3 2750:Kautilya3 2665:this tool 2658:this tool 2543:Kautilya3 2528:Kautilya3 2512:Kautilya3 2475:Vagbhata2 2460:Kautilya3 2456:WP:HISTRS 2429:Vagbhata2 2413:Vagbhata2 2406:Side note 2382:Kautilya3 2342:Kautilya3 2309:Kautilya3 2289:consensus 2256:Kautilya3 2200:Kautilya3 2142:Kautilya3 2096:Accession 2083:Kautilya3 2048:|ref=harv 2039:cite book 1967:consensus 1920:Kautilya3 1848:Kautilya3 1814:Kautilya3 1774:Kautilya3 1724:Kautilya3 1685:Kautilya3 1671:Kautilya3 1636:Kautilya3 1610:Kautilya3 1595:Kautilya3 1555:Telangana 1533:Abecedare 1067:Abecedare 943:Abecedare 931:Abecedare 667:Abecedare 390:Ramashray 147:Hyderabad 139:Telangana 39:is rated 4209:Peaceray 4193:Peaceray 4068:Peaceray 4038:, & 3903:contribs 3823:British. 3740:SnowFire 3654:SnowFire 3142:Cheers.— 3029:Gotitbro 2746:WP:LABEL 2671:Cheers.— 2046:Invalid 1904:this one 1880:Bishonen 1710:Or, the 1561:, India) 1182:to your 652:Lanet303 631:contribs 619:unsigned 603:Religion 594:Language 554:Monareal 535:unsigned 513:unsigned 479:unsigned 452:Jeff3000 405:unsigned 337:deletion 4233:comment 4189:exactly 4168:.google 4166:scholar 4147:.google 3983:comment 3947:Bhagya2 3935:comment 3924:Bhagya2 3907:Bhagya2 3845:Johnbod 3589:WP:NPOV 3339:comment 3191:NizamAA 3056:my edit 2827:country 2725:Country 2595:my edit 2248:WP:NPOV 1994:4322137 1971:WP:NPOV 1797:least? 1547:Capital 1494:AVAAGAA 1449:AVAAGAA 1270:"Revert 1038:Thanks. 808:WP:VAND 623:HotWick 597:Customs 587:Culture 505:Rubbish 468:" and " 423:POV tag 332:O Osman 230:on the 143:History 41:C-class 4217:Sitush 4066:what. 3974:WP:BRD 3736:WP:3RR 3568:rule". 3315:NzamAA 3294:NzamAA 3242:NzamAA 3224:NzamAA 3171:NzamAA 3025:second 1712:Chauth 1697:Ghatus 1687:, and 1184:WP:3RR 1063:WP:BRD 1058:WP:3RR 1028:women. 870:WP:AIV 353:merged 47:scale. 4272:. -- 3722:WP:RS 3262:? -- 3203:? -- 3021:first 2967:. -- 2965:WP:OR 2916:WP:RS 2748:. -- 2559:Flags 2541:. -- 2458:. -- 2448:WP:OR 2252:WP:OR 2244:WP:RS 2123:☎ 911 2005:(PDF) 1991:JSTOR 1916:WP:OR 1912:force 1908:annex 1898:This 1769:page. 1308:this? 874:first 810:). -- 355:into 349:merge 203:India 192:India 134:India 28:This 4530:talk 4505:talk 4471:talk 4462:and 4451:talk 4436:talk 4421:talk 4406:talk 4375:talk 4348:talk 4326:talk 4308:talk 4293:talk 4278:talk 4268:See 4259:talk 4197:talk 4170:.com 4149:.com 4100:talk 4086:talk 4072:talk 3999:talk 3976:. -- 3951:talk 3911:talk 3897:talk 3849:talk 3833:talk 3820:Oudh 3797:talk 3783:talk 3744:talk 3684:talk 3658:talk 3626:talk 3612:talk 3597:talk 3587:and 3585:WP:V 3574:talk 3546:talk 3537:Done 3521:talk 3495:ISBN 3465:talk 3449:talk 3420:talk 3385:talk 3370:talk 3319:talk 3298:talk 3282:talk 3268:talk 3246:talk 3228:talk 3209:talk 3175:talk 3033:talk 3003:ISBN 2973:talk 2954:talk 2946:talk 2925:talk 2903:talk 2870:talk 2856:talk 2835:talk 2816:talk 2794:talk 2775:said 2754:talk 2735:talk 2716:talk 2702:talk 2573:talk 2547:talk 2516:talk 2479:talk 2464:talk 2433:talk 2417:talk 2386:talk 2365:talk 2346:talk 2328:talk 2313:talk 2279:talk 2260:talk 2246:and 2229:talk 2204:talk 2184:talk 2161:talk 2146:talk 2087:talk 2052:help 2026:ISBN 1953:talk 1939:talk 1924:talk 1900:edit 1884:talk 1866:talk 1852:talk 1832:talk 1818:talk 1803:talk 1778:talk 1748:talk 1728:talk 1701:talk 1675:talk 1655:talk 1640:talk 1621:talk 1599:talk 1570:talk 1566:Muzi 1557:and 1537:talk 1506:Neil 1502:. -- 1488:this 1436:talk 1400:talk 1190:Neil 1169:talk 1083:Neil 1071:talk 1044:talk 960:Neil 947:talk 935:talk 918:as " 912:Some 880:Neil 860:talk 814:Neil 797:talk 745:Neil 728:talk 697:Neil 671:talk 656:talk 627:talk 572:talk 558:talk 543:talk 521:talk 487:talk 413:talk 365:here 4145:www 3920:Hi 3110:RfC 3080:to 3070:to 2639:RfC 2609:to 2198:-- 2112:eri 2069:doi 1179:one 464:" " 432:pov 339:. 222:Low 4544:: 4532:) 4507:) 4473:) 4453:) 4438:) 4423:) 4408:) 4377:) 4350:) 4328:) 4310:) 4295:) 4280:) 4261:) 4199:) 4102:) 4088:) 4074:) 4034:, 4030:, 4026:, 4001:) 3953:) 3913:) 3851:) 3835:) 3814:, 3810:, 3799:) 3785:) 3746:) 3686:) 3660:) 3628:) 3614:) 3599:) 3576:) 3548:) 3523:) 3467:) 3451:) 3422:) 3372:) 3321:) 3300:) 3284:) 3270:) 3248:) 3230:) 3211:) 3177:) 3123:. 3118:}} 3114:{{ 3035:) 2975:) 2956:) 2927:) 2905:) 2872:) 2858:) 2837:) 2818:) 2796:) 2756:) 2737:) 2718:) 2704:) 2652:. 2647:}} 2643:{{ 2575:) 2549:) 2518:) 2507:, 2481:) 2466:) 2435:) 2419:) 2388:) 2367:) 2348:) 2330:) 2315:) 2281:) 2262:) 2231:) 2206:) 2186:) 2163:) 2148:) 2127:| 2119:| 2115:ff 2109:Sh 2089:) 2063:. 2043:: 2041:}} 2037:{{ 2013:44 2011:. 2007:. 1985:, 1955:) 1941:) 1926:) 1882:| 1868:) 1854:) 1834:) 1820:) 1805:) 1780:) 1750:) 1730:) 1703:) 1677:) 1657:) 1642:) 1623:) 1601:) 1572:) 1539:) 1438:) 1402:) 1171:) 1159:-- 1073:) 1046:) 949:) 862:) 799:) 730:) 673:) 658:) 633:) 629:• 574:) 560:) 545:) 523:) 489:) 472:" 435:}} 429:{{ 415:) 306:). 282:). 258:). 145:/ 141:/ 137:: 4528:( 4503:( 4469:( 4449:( 4434:( 4419:( 4404:( 4373:( 4346:( 4324:( 4306:( 4291:( 4276:( 4257:( 4235:) 4231:( 4219:: 4215:@ 4211:: 4207:@ 4195:( 4139:. 4129:: 4125:@ 4098:( 4084:( 4070:( 4052:. 4016:: 4012:@ 3997:( 3985:) 3981:( 3969:: 3965:@ 3949:( 3937:) 3933:( 3926:: 3922:@ 3909:( 3900:· 3895:( 3847:( 3831:( 3795:( 3781:( 3742:( 3713:: 3709:@ 3682:( 3656:( 3624:( 3610:( 3595:( 3572:( 3565:: 3561:@ 3544:( 3519:( 3463:( 3447:( 3418:( 3387:) 3383:( 3368:( 3341:) 3337:( 3317:( 3296:( 3280:( 3266:( 3244:( 3226:( 3207:( 3193:: 3189:@ 3173:( 3155:) 3151:( 3138:. 3131:. 3031:( 2971:( 2952:( 2944:( 2923:( 2901:( 2868:( 2854:( 2848:: 2844:@ 2833:( 2814:( 2808:: 2804:@ 2792:( 2777:: 2767:: 2763:@ 2752:( 2733:( 2714:( 2700:( 2684:) 2680:( 2667:. 2660:. 2571:( 2545:( 2530:: 2526:@ 2514:( 2502:: 2498:@ 2477:( 2462:( 2431:( 2415:( 2384:( 2363:( 2344:( 2326:( 2311:( 2296:. 2277:( 2258:( 2227:( 2202:( 2182:( 2159:( 2144:( 2085:( 2075:. 2071:: 2065:8 2054:) 2050:( 2033:. 1987:4 1951:( 1937:( 1922:( 1889:. 1864:( 1850:( 1830:( 1816:( 1801:( 1776:( 1746:( 1726:( 1699:( 1673:( 1653:( 1638:( 1619:( 1612:: 1608:@ 1597:( 1588:: 1584:@ 1568:( 1535:( 1508:N 1456:↪ 1434:( 1398:( 1192:N 1167:( 1085:N 1069:( 1042:( 962:N 945:( 933:( 910:" 882:N 858:( 816:N 795:( 747:N 726:( 699:N 669:( 654:( 625:( 570:( 556:( 541:( 519:( 485:( 446:" 441:" 411:( 367:. 234:. 200:. 97:. 53::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index