21:
76:
I have requested that the neutrality of this article is looked into as I feel as though it has not been written with limited scope of discussion and minimal objectivity. There is also a woefully limited number of sources, in fact the majority seems to stem from once source which is thus only
31:
37:
27:
61:
57:
53:
20:
82:
52:
segregation? I fail to see the difference between what this article is describing, and
78:
86:
65:
15:
56:as defined. Where did the "hyper" come from?
8:
38:Racial segregation in the United States
30:on 30 March 2010 (UTC). The result of
7:
14:
77:forwarding a limited viewpoint.
19:
26:This article was nominated for
1:
87:14:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
72:Article neutrality debatable
66:19:04, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
102:
54:de facto segregation
48:Why is it called
45:
44:
93:
23:
16:
101:
100:
96:
95:
94:
92:
91:
90:
12:
11:
5:
99:
97:
70:
47:
43:
42:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
98:
89:
88:
84:
80:
74:
73:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
40:
39:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
75:
71:
69:
58:Stonemason89
49:
46:
35:
36:merge to
28:deletion
79:Tong22
50:hyper
83:talk
62:talk
34:was
85:)
64:)
81:(
60:(
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
