Talk:ICJ case on Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories

3545:

rise to suggestions the court was antisemitic in its bias; the second, regarding interim decisions, such as stopping the invasion of Rafah, elicited similar reaction in Israel (Ben-Gvir et al), but we make no allusion to that decision, which was integral to the ICJ's deliberations; the third phase was the court decision in July, which produced a rat-a-tat series of antisemitic accusations. The israeli responses to phases 1, and 2, received coverage suggesting that the charge of antisemitism was 'intimidating',* 'instrumental' etc., (even if weaponizing wasn't used, as far as I can see). The final July decision did not elicit rebuttals of the 'false' assertions it was motivated by antisemitism (no one outside of Israel seems to take that ritual chant seriously). So it is a borderline call: in phases 1,2, the antisemitic charge was responded to as an abuse of the word (weaponization), phase 3 no. If the last sentence was formulated to refer to the whole arc of the ICJ's deliberations, January, May, July, then it would be reasonable to retain the weaponization link, particularly in view of the fact that antisemitic accusations are very serious, fine when justified, but toxically defamatory when shorn of any evidence. Linking to weaponization doesn't state in wikivoice that these mechanical assertions are such - it merely directs the reader to examine the wider context of many such political statements. We leave antisemitism hanging in the lead without qualification, and that is not quite NPOV as phrased.

1638: 1662: 3862:

the Occupied Palestinian Territory ('settlers') are predominantly Israelis, as well as non-Israeli Jews who qualify for Israeli nationality under Israeli legislation." This description matches the distinction which Israel makes between the two types of resident, such as whether civilian or military law is applied to them. The fact that non-Israeli Jews who qualify for Israeli nationality under the Law of Return are treated the same as citizens in the OT is not well known but it is true. An Arab living in a settlement or outpost is a "settler" (there are a small number of them). A Jew who lives in the OT but not in a settlement or outpost is not literally included, but this is a point that the lawyers might like to argue about.

3401:

made such a finding." Also, as regards the still ongoing CERD proceedings "CERD has yet to reach a final decision in this case. With a strong finding of a breach of Article 3 from the ICJ and several judicial opinions interpreting this as a finding of apartheid, this may well create a platform for CERD to determine the issue." & "The questions put by UNGA to the Court ‘concern Israel’s "discriminatory legislation and measures" under international human rights law and not apartheid as an international crime." "the Opinion considered that the Apartheid Convention and Rome Statute 'can inform the interpretation of Article 3 of CERD'".

3777:"Restitution includes Israel’s obligation to return the land and other immovable property, as well as all assets seized from any natural or legal person since its occupation started in 1967, and all cultural property and assets taken from Palestinians and Palestinian institutions, including archives and documents. It also requires the evacuation of all settlers from existing settlements and the dismantling of the parts of the wall constructed by Israel that are situated in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, as well as allowing all Palestinians displaced during the occupation to return to their original place of residence." 2803:

expertise. It makes little sense to rush into covering a minor highly contentious point that arose within a day or two of a historic judgement that even today is barely 4 days old. Give it at least two weeks to see how specialists address the issue. We should write to have enduring, stable text, and exercise patience to that end. I say that as someone who has no problem is thinking that Israel's occupation of Palestinian lands deserves the label apartheid even if, as Chomsky and many others have stated, the WB situation is far worse than the classic example of apartheid (South Africa).

3421:

If editors wish to discuss potential 'weaponization' of antisemitism in regards to this case, then it should have it's own section or should be added to the existing article. But to quote political leaders of Israel (regardless of what ill repute they may be) in an encyclopedic article and then add your own interpretation of what they said is basically tantamount to adding "here's what they REALLY mean/this is what it ACTUALLY is" which is so beneath encyclopedic standards and npov. This is particularly relevant when you consider that the relationship between

973: 993: 121: 1026: 1574: 190: 169: 2970:, which will cover both the decision from a legal perspective and, in all probability, the confusion in secondary newspaper accounts published immediately after the decision was made known, it's fair to presume that we will have a first RS which handles this for us, without our patching up (at the risk of WP:OR) an account that tries to sort out such incongruencies. Patience is a virtue except when it is played to kill time. 3745:

Israeli law is "pipelined" to the settlements, then that makes them Israeli citizens and so they constitute a "presence"? That's getting into the weeds a bit, I will see if I can find anything else on that. Idk if there are any Palestinian citizens of Israel in the settlements, possible I suppose, if a bit unlikely, another question there. I know that settlement units have been sold abroad, I would guess to dual citizens.

782: 761: 404: 200: 21: 792: 291: 270: 2410:

on both aspects. Eventually, physical segregation and legislative discrimination aspects would have to be termed, and that is where the court explicitly says this is indeed at least segregation but not explicitly also apartheid (even though there is no difference and the CERD 3rd article says "and" not "or"). But it does indeed say implicitly that this is the case by saying it violated article 3.

93: 301: 3625: 1953: 1768: 1604: 1527: 3926:

power. Israeli settlers in the West Bank includes Jewish Israelis and to a much lesser degree Arab Israelis or other non-Jewish Israelis. So, yes, in short, supposedly, the evacuation of Israeli settlers from the West Bank includes virtually all Jews living there, including from the Old City in East Jerusalem. This is obviously in theory and as a matter of adherence to international law.

138: 2344:, I think this is what we ought to pay more attention to, the ICC warrants that have been requested notably do not include potential charges over the settlement issue but now, after this opinion (I prefer to think of it as an authoritative statement of the law), that low hanging fruit is there for the picking, I will be very interested to see whether the ICC goes for it. 3711:"The court said Israel's presence in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are unlawful and must be ended as soon as possible, including by evacuating Jewish settlers from the territories." The transfer of Israeli citizens into Israeli settlements has long been seen as illegal so it's not an odd thing to say. I could try to look it up exactly in the opinion, is that enough? 1374:

consequences themselves. Moreover, the way the lede is structured is a bit clunky: "The ICJ case is a proceeding in the International Court of Justice (ICJ)". In my opinion, the lede should either use the name of the case in question as it was before the move (but keeping the current title) or rework it to not include either, something along the lines of: "An

1737: 913: 882: 1637: 2706:

If a notable expert sees essentially no difference between segregation and apartheid, then that can be quoted or summarised. After all, whether all forms of racism are "a single thing" or are distinct by nuances or are hugely and fundamentally different from one another is one of the key issues of the whole I/P conflict.

2137:

said before and I think the RS is picking that up, the sum total of the whole opinion (the US was complaining about its "breadth"), the illegality (whatever words you use to describe that) of virtually everything Israel is doing in its occupation, that is the thing that is going to hit home the hardest. My 2 cents.

1038: 3466:

It is hard to see, by any standard, how the ICJ (and the ICC and the UN and any other international body that criticizes the Israeli government for its actions) can be called antisemitic by representatives of the accused, unless the accusation is for political gain, in other words, a weaponization of

2858:

We are not prioritizing 3, we are saying to wait for authoritative sourcing (3 is written by a qualified lawyer and and you did not mention the other legal view, EJIL that agrees with 3). Essentially you are saying we should ignore lawyerly interpretations of an opinion about legal issues in favor of

2705:

stated that the situation is apartheid while avoiding it in legal terms, or think that the ICJ chose this wording in order to achieve consensus among the judges, then we can report that as part of the debate in interpreting the ruling. But this is separate from the ICJ's chosen wording in its ruling.

2700:

section. E.g. something along the lines of "The ICJ stated ..." (i.e. it decided to avoid specifically saying "the situation is apartheid"); HRW interpreted this with the statement, "...", Gross/Haaretz (sorry, I've only browsed the discussion, I haven't actually checked) interpeted this ... In other

2439:

Yep, but the issue is not the reality there, or our personal views, but what a source can be said to state. Some sources did not read it correctly for its intrinsic ambiguity, and, nota bene, in arriving at a broad consensus judgment in these venues, every word reflects a mediation, every paragraph a

2325:

That is why a close reading of the text will not conclude that the court recognized (the obvious) apartheid nature of the 'separation'. A majority of judges were not ready to make this highly specific determination, which would have almost immediately led to a formal indictment of Israel for a 'crime

2182:

Self is correct. I read the 87 page verdict when it came out, and the way the two mentions of it at 223-224, p.65 are phrased clearly show the court heard, but decided not to enter into the merits of this claim. Yes, secondary sources, newspapers, occasionally got this wrong, and it is to be expected

2116:

I still don't understand this part: "amount to a form of segregation in the occupied territories, although it did not decide whether the segregation was in fact apartheid." We have plenty of RS including HRW and AI saying that they had indeed said it amounted to apartheid. So why are we giving fringe

2024:

Regarding this: "Israel countered the opinion by stating that a political settlement can only be attained through diplomatic negotiations"; this was actually addressed by the ICJ which explicitly said that Palestinian rights are not subject to the whim's of the occupying power; so why was this added?

3544:

I saw this earlier this morning, but while thinking the link ('related information' in wikipolicy) justifiable, had some reservations as Sean has. Part of the problem is that the ICJ rulings were in three stages and we cover in the lead two. The original decision to accept SA's brief in January gave

3420:

Linking to 'Weaponization of antisemitism' in the bottom paragraph of the lead section ("Israeli leaders and politicians further decried the ruling as antisemitic") appears like a total violation of npov. Particularly when the linked source doesn't even mention, let alone support, such an inference.

2409:

First, there is no difference between segregation and apartheid; as apartheid just means apartness, i.e. segregation. It could be argued that segregation would be a physical aspect and apartheid is a more institutionalized and legislative aspect, but the court explicitly indicted the state of Israel

2306:

particularly severe forms,' two distinct if related forms of discrimination, 'racial segregation' and 'apartheid', in a strictly legal perspective they cannot be conflated as interchangeable. There is elbow room for any legal scholar to argue (a dodge, perhaps,. but correct until clarified in later

3925:

To keep it simple; 1948-1967, zero Jews lived in the West Bank, and there are no Jewish citizens of Palestine. After 1967, every Israeli citizen currently residing permanently in the West Bank is a settler, as they had moved in there due to their transfer by the Israeli state, which is an occupying

3861:

passed by the court says "Is of the opinion that the State of Israel is under an obligation to cease immediately all new settlement activities, and to evacuate all settlers from the Occupied Palestinian Territory". In the discussion (para 68), it says "The residents of settlements and 'outposts' in

3022:

Thanks. Given there is no controversy over the racial segregation and discrimination part, would you support: "The court also ruled that Israeli policies and legistlation maintain a system of systemic discrimination and segregation against Palestinians, violating the International Convention on the

2986:

As mentioned before, if RS change so can the phrasing; WP is a constantly changing medium of information according to how RS change, so we are not trying to settle this overnight; we are simply reflecting what RS says in real-time. I will take this suggestion as a temporary solution and still think

2843:

So why are we prioritizing (3) a fringe phrasing by an non-independent, conflicting and unspecialized source at the expense of (1) and (2)? If RS change so can the phrasing, no need to wait for two weeks when this issue is off the public spotlight. I am still of the opinion that (2) is an excellent

2802:

Look, there is agreement about a conflict in sources. We differ in evaluation. We're writing an encyclopedia and one aim is to gradually ensure that fly-by-day/night instantaneous newspaper responses to breaking news sources be replaced by solid retrospective RS that wear some authority, reflecting

1897:

I have made this edit myself (and before having read this part of the talk page at that), since nowhere in the source does it give any opinion from a reliable source calling it weaponization (should one be found, that should be added as a separate clause or sentence). And a Knowledge (XXG) editor's

2136:

Otoh, the ICJ was not really focused on the specific issue of apartheid (where the judges are likely to disagree, see their individual opinions) and was taking a more broad overview of all of the Israeli practices, and all of them taken together not just one by one was a point they also made. As I

3400:

We now have some more detailed legal analysis. Confirms "a breach of Article 3 could refer to racial segregation, apartheid, or both. This is seen in the Separate Opinions, some of which considered the finding of a breach of Article 3 as a finding of apartheid; others believing the Court had not

2132:

It's not Haaretz, it's Aeyal Gross, who is well qualified to opine on the matter (and if you read the actual ICJ opinion which I wrote out at Israel and apartheid article, he is not really wrong is he?) Also Amnesty and HRW will want to, naturally enough, look for endorsement of reports that they

3393:

On the particular point:- "The International Court of Justice has established that certain human rights obligations apply to Israel, including in relation to the occupied territories. It has established a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, which

2257:

Yep, so the argument runs that apartheid and segregation are two separate things (225) and that it is a breach of Article 3 either way (229) but we (the court) are not going to explicitly say which it is (which is a pain in the neck but if you look at the individual judges opinions, I think they

1817:

Afaics, you are able to edit the article yourself if you wish to. For myself "The exploitation of accusations of antisemitism for political purposes, especially to counter anti-Zionism and criticism of Israel" (what it says at the Wikilink) appears to be an accurate description of the situation,

2941:

Most media reports (possibly erroneously) say that amounts to apartheid and a couple don't. So a simple sentence saying: "Most but not all media reports have interpreted this breach as amounting to instituting apartheid". (thereby making it clear that this is journos rather than legal secondary

3744:

JNS is a biased source, but maybe reliable enough. The opinion says "the transfer by Israel of settlers to the West Bank and Jerusalem as well as Israel’s maintenance of their presence, is contrary to article 49 of the 4th Geneva convention" The descendants thing Idk but I would say that since

3256:

Yes, that's what I would expect now, a ratcheting up of the pressure with the idea of forcing Israel to agree to not only and end to the Gaza war but to focus on "the day after". Have you read the individual judge opinions? Salam was maybe the most clear "“to focus specifically on two of these

2771:

I think the most appropriate middle ground solution -for now- would be to say it the way RS like the Intercept and the Guardian framed it: "also found Israel to be violating an international agreement against racial segregation and apartheid;" without elaborating whether it did label Israel as

3515:

Well, I never added the link to begin with but I have to say I agree entirely with the proposition, at the link it says at line 1 "The exploitation of accusations of antisemitism for political purposes, especially to counter anti-Zionism and criticism of Israel" which is exactly what this is.

1373:

I agree with the move to the current title, but the lede is certainly problematic, much as the title itself, it should not be in italics, when the title was the same as the name of the case (and in italics) it indicated that this article was about a case with that name and not about the legal

3239:

Also another Haaretz article: "The court asserted that the regime that Israel administers in the West Bank and East Jerusalem was similar to the apartheid regime in South Africa because of the different legal systems for settlers and Palestinians and the physical separation between the two."

2725:

We'll probably in duke horse get to something like that. I just think it dangerous to give any impression that wiki text is written on the wing to get polemical/political traction (depending of editorial POVs). I believe there are good reasons to suspect that the sources for the separation =

80:

If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is

3575:

also took a swipe at Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over his labelling of the International Criminal Court (ICC) chief prosecutor Karim Khan decision to seek arrest warrants against some Israeli politicians as evidence of "new antisemitism". Borrell called the comment a form of

2535:

The FT says "The court said these policies were in breach of an international agreement against racial segregation and apartheid, called the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination." That is correct and does not say that the situation is apartheid.

3429:, and the possibility that the source of that bias is antisemitism, being much discussed. Whether one believes accusations of anti-Israel bias at the UN are accurate or not is irrelevant: It's a major point of dispute and to take sides by simply waving your hand and saying "lies. slander. 2627:

We're all familiar with the vice of news reportsd. loazy and partisan meme repetition. Yes, mainly on israel's behaòlf but here, arguably, also functioning re the Palestinian side. So rather than play the balancing memes battle, we should wait for authoritative legally informed specialist

2787:

I still think we need to wait a bit on the segregation/apartheid thing, for this article we should first concentrate on those parts of the judgement where there is a clear consensus in sources on what the opinion said and get that down pat, before struggling with the unclear bits.

2877:. A proposal: "The court found that Israel practices systemic discrimination and segregation against Palestinians and that this in violation of an international treaty on segregation and apartheid, but sources differ on whether apartheid was meant." Would you support that? 2649:"As always, there was a price for obtaining that consensus: ambiguities and silences in the Court’s analysis on some important points (for example, on whether Israel’s practices in the OPT amount to apartheid, or whether Palestine has already achieved statehood)." 2914:

If you think we have prioritized 3, then cut the lead sentence to read only "The court also ruled that Israeli policies violate the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination" and just leave it at that for the time being.

3107:

writing in Guardian: “ Moreover, ‘’’although the finding was hidden in legalese’’’, the court ruled that Israel has imposed a regime of apartheid in the occupied Palestinian territory by virtue of its systematic discrimination against Palestinian residents.”

3195:

Significantly, the ICJ found Israel’s laws and measures maintained “a near-complete separation in the West Bank and East Jerusalem between the settler and Palestinian communities” and these breached the international prohibition on “racial segregation and

2425:, as this would be the common name of this institutionalized system of discrimination. And we can still mention this institutionalized system of discrimination and segregation in the lede here, without saying the court disagreed on the apartheid analogy. 1148: 2183:

that, in this case, 'pro-Palestinian' editorialists or partisans might begin to trust those instead of the original and those who like Gross competently gloss it. Since the court made no such deliberation, we simply ignore the misprision as it crops up.

3516:

Sourcing containing the actual word "weaponization" is not necessary as long as there is sourcing that clearly indicates what is going on, perhaps I will spend some time looking for some, rather than instead giving credence to nonsensical allegations.

2897:, obviously tends to the Palestinian perspective, they say "An extensive summary of the advisory opinion along with an analysis of its main pillars will be released soon by Law for Palestine." and meanwhile, on the issue at hand here, they only say: 3725:

I'd be curious to know if the court said "Jewish settlers" or "Israeli settlers" must be evacuated. Also wondering if JNS is RS on this topic. Finally, does the definition of "settlers" include their descendants who were born in the West Bank?

2967: 2894: 1661: 1301:

There is quite a good number of information that could be added, including for example the bits that I have just inserted into the lede. More elaborations needed in body on ICJ's 2004 case; settlements expansion; apartheid analogy; and more.

558: 2594:

Oxfam says ""The Court confirmed that Israel is committing the crime of apartheid in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which is one of the most serious international crimes." Again, press release not convincing, again I think it is wrong.

3576:

intimidation, saying accusations of antisemitism were made every time that anyone "does something that Netanyahu doesn't like." "Their position about antisemitism against the prosecutor of the ICC is completely not acceptable," he added.

2413:

Either way these are all personal interpretations, and we are left to RS, which almost unanimously agree that the ruling said it had amounted to apartheid, except for one Haaretz article that was contradicted by another on the following

1045: 2564:

Amnesty says "Israel’s occupation and annexation of the Palestinian territories are unlawful, and its discriminatory laws and policies against Palestinians violate the prohibition on racial segregation and apartheid." which is correct.

2226:

225. Article 3 of CERD provides as follows: “States Parties particularly condemn racial segregation and apartheid and undertake to prevent, prohibit and eradicate all practices of this nature in territories under their jurisdiction.”

2726:

apartheid are reading into that cautiously phrased text something that is not 'explicitly' stated. And since it is a matter of technical legal interpretation we should wait for several area experts with that qualification to clarify.

3241: 2900:"The Court concluded that Israel’s policies and practices violate Article 3 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, specifically the prohibition against segregation and apartheid." (ie like 2). 2160:

The court said the occupation is de facto annexation, answering the core question it was asked to address. It added that the occupation consists of "systematic discrimination, segregation and" – here comes the dreaded a-word –

3468: 1330: 2643: 1130: 3316:

Seems that the sole Haaretz article is in the minority and does not represent current mainstream RS views. I don't think we should wait for further RS; WP can be a real-time reflection of RS if they later somehow change.

1122: 3203:

The Israeli government has long rejected claims of apartheid, but the ICJ ruling is consistent with allegations levelled by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the Jerusalem-based non-government organisation

3563:

did not directly address the antisemitic accusations against the ICJ, but in an aside took exception to Netanyahu's dismissal of the concurrent proceedings of the ICC. The situations are identical but only implicitly

3271:

I have only read the apartheid-related parts there, in an attempt to understand the general ruling's sections on apartheid. Seems more and more RS are interpreting the ruling in line with the mentioned view of Salam.

2910:

If you insist on doing something right now, then I agree with Boud, the issue needs to be addressed comprehensively in the article body as a first step rather than debating what precise language we should use in the

3500:

I don't disagree, but it doesn't matter how I see it. Since some people throw the word antisemitic around like candy, maybe it's an example of the candification of antisemitism. Either way, it needs decent sourcing.

3904:

If the OPT = SoP (one occupied, one claimed but same territory), then the applicable law of Palestine would determine who could be a resident or citizen independently of any international law requirement to vacate.

3876:

What do you mean by "A Jew who lives in the OT but not in a settlement or outpost is not literally included"? If they are not living in a settlement or outpost, but living in OPT, then where would they be living?

702: 2579:

HRW says "including, for the first time, finding Israel responsible for apartheid" HRW is reliable, like Amnesty for its reports, I am not convinced by this press release tho. And I think it is actually wrong.

3390: 2069: 2518: 2612:

Now, if with a bit of time, this proportion continues like that, then we will have a situation of conflicting sources but it is noteworthy (atm) the absence of some big name RS, Beeb, WAPO, NYT etcetera.

2237:

229. The Court observes that Israel’s legislation and measures impose and serve to maintain a near-complete separation in the West Bank and East Jerusalem between the settler and Palestinian communities.

2697: 2154: 3257:

policies which, in my view, demonstrate the systematic and deliberate nature of Israel’s conduct in breach of international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, namely settlement and apartheid."

568: 2165:

Yea, I don't know where they got that from, it's in quotes but I can't find it anywhere and attributed to a couple Haaretz authors plus AP plus Reuters so I wouldn't pay too much attention to that.

1558: 2417:

Even in case the disagreement among us continues, this would be only a matter of semantics; Israel was still explicitly indicted on operating an institutionalized system of discrimination. Thus,

2929:

The problem is it is just the media (rather than considered RS) highlighting this but it can't be ignored because of that. Wouldn't it best to just report closely only what we know, which is:

2550:

The Intercept says "The court also notably declared Israel’s mistreatment of Palestinians to be a form of segregation and apartheid" OK, it is RS but I don't agree that's what the court said.

963: 3169:"report on the implications of this advisory opinion for the responsibility the State of Israel, the State of Palestine, third States, and where appropriate business entities, and the UN." 1126: 484: 4065: 953: 3109: 469: 4085: 3791:

Can you provide a link to that? Am I correcting assuming that the court case and the resolution called for the evacuation of Israelis and not Jews? Should be added to the article?

4095: 3588:

Given the nature of this discussion, maybe I should have just removed the line from the lead pending discussion. I didn't consider whether it was lead-worthy. Perhaps it isn't.

1487:, as it says “The ICJ case on Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories refers to a case”. Obviously the case doesn’t refer to a case, instead the case just IS a case. 929: 670: 3222: 2372:

Other interesting things apart from the illegality of occupation, status of East Jerusalem (and the attendant WB annex), Gaza was/still is occupied, there is a lot in there.

585: 430: 4050: 854: 4060: 2040:

Perhaps change the verb from "countered", which it didn't if the point was already addressed, to "re-stated"? Or just "said". Either way, "countered" is editorializing.

3037:

I would rather quote the opinion directly (in the article body), not sure if there is a secondary that does so rather than using the primary, I will have another look.

577: 3207: 3129:

It's audio (at the end) and they talk about ambiguity and the court not detailing how Israel was in breach, etcetera. So, I don't think we a re any further ahead yet.

920: 887: 499: 1631:

For the two vote tables in the article, I think it would be helpful to include a world map color coding each country's vote. I've made maps for the two vote tables.

4090: 4035: 1281: 347: 3759:

I don't mean to be pedantic but just because the judgment condemns the transfer of settlers to the west bank didn't mean it is calling for their evacuation, right?

1155: 640: 2406:

Okay, now I see how this was open to interpretation and understand your point of view. I think this is a valid interpretation that is nevertheless conservative.

1217: 3295:"Perhaps most seriously, the court determined that Israel administers a system of racial segregation and possibly even apartheid in the occupied territories." 864: 1195:

Seems odd both for this article and the others not to have ICJ in the title. "Advisory opinion..." seems to fail Precision. "ICJ opinion on..." works better.

4075: 3577: 655: 2089:

The US said pretty much the same thing, the judgement is not within the "established framework". To which one possible response is -- change the framework.

4080: 4045: 424: 2497:

Six RS (seven if you count Haaretz's other article; or consider Haaretz an independent RS) have said the court characterized this as apartheid, including

2261:

I would reiterate that there is a lot more to this opinion than just apartheid, in some respects it is much more damning than a "mere" apartheid finding.

2218:

have argued that Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory amount to segregation or apartheid, in breach of Article 3 of CERD.

619: 602: 4010: 2498: 1002: 896: 826: 357: 2609:

So, looking at it what we have is FT and Amnesty are in line with Gross and then we have the Guardian, Intercept, HRW and Oxfam saying it is apartheid.

3895:

For example, not all suburbs of East Jerusalem would be classified as settlements if they pre-existed. The ICJ did not go into this level of detail.

491: 4070: 4030: 1094: 3967: 4055: 1221: 982: 892: 830: 252: 3530:

Yes, I would say that it is a breach of NPOV to leave the puerile allegations of antisemitism in the lead without any qualification whatsoever.

2068:

Can't access the article neither through log in nor WP library for some reason but it might address this point or a point very closely related:

1097: 594: 3132: 2514: 3391:

Germany’s Reaction to the International Court of Justice’s Palestine Advisory Opinion: 'The Opinion Confirms Our Positioning in Many Points'

1818:

Israeli politicians calling the court, its judges, the opinion and even just the request for an opinion, antisemitic (among other things).

4040: 4020: 3686: 1883:

It seems you are not EC, so there is nothing further to discuss. Nor do I have any interest in your opinion as to my grasp of WP policies.

242: 38:, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic: 3993: 3979: 3955: 3935: 3914: 3899: 3890: 3866: 3832: 3818: 3804: 3786: 3772: 3754: 3739: 3720: 3702: 3675: 3661: 3597: 3554: 3539: 3525: 3510: 3495: 3461: 3442: 3410: 3340: 3326: 3304: 3281: 3266: 3251: 3234: 3217: 3181: 3161: 3147: 3120: 3091: 3077: 3063: 3046: 3032: 3017: 2996: 2979: 2961: 2924: 2886: 2868: 2853: 2812: 2797: 2781: 2735: 2715: 2658: 2637: 2622: 2604: 2589: 2574: 2559: 2545: 2530: 2478: 2449: 2434: 2381: 2367: 2353: 2335: 2270: 2252: 2192: 2174: 2146: 2126: 2098: 2080: 2063: 2049: 2034: 2014: 2000: 1927: 1892: 1878: 1864: 1841: 1827: 1811: 1752: 1727: 1711: 1696: 1588: 1566: 1511: 1496: 1470: 1452: 1438: 1410: 1395: 1356: 1342: 1325: 1311: 1296: 1274: 1250: 1233: 1204: 1181: 1167: 1142: 1110: 508: 323: 1100: 1554:

I want to change existing '...is a proceeding bedore the International Court of Justice' to before the International Court of Justice.

1488: 2314:

covered by CERN were practiced. Israeli lawyers would argue that there is ample wriggle room here to deny that the official policy of

1685:

I think the maps could be put alongside the tables in their respective sections, but I'm not sure if the tables are too wide for that.

1562: 2211:

The court did indeed deliberate on article 3 of CERD relating to segregation and apartheid, and was explicit in its advisory opinion:

1832:

I’m not able to edit the article myself. And your personal opinion does not override Knowledge (XXG)’s neutral point of view policy.

822: 805: 766: 649: 4025: 3483: 3479: 3397: 2299:

apartheid.' 'Or' has two functions: (a) to flag an alternative ('either . .or') (b) to gloss parenthetically ('or in other words').

809:, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic 3426: 3126: 2258:

would not have been able to collectively say that it is apartheid but that they could agree that it is (at least) segregation).

1383: 635: 3152:

The NYT is known for extreme mental gymnastics while reporting on anything negative about Israel, I wouldn’t prioritize them.

3051: 662: 416: 314: 275: 149: 74: 45: 31: 3858: 3475: 2422: 1379: 3286: 478: 2469:

I also said and still say we should wait a bit for the dust to settle and the analysis to appear. There really is no rush.

4015: 3422: 2502: 1796: 1391: 1061: 628: 70: 3689:". Does either the UN resolution or the icj judgment mandate that all Jews must leave the West Bank and East jerusalem? 3438: 1209: 213: 174: 98:

A news item involving ICJ case on Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s

1419: 554: 2510: 2240:

For this reason, the Court considers that Israel’s legislation and measures constitute a breach of Article 3 of CERD.

461: 3708: 3166: 1996: 518: 120: 3631: 2844:

middle ground solution to these three options and is supported by RS rather than by our personal interpretations.

2229:

This provision refers to two particularly severe forms of racial discrimination: racial segregation and apartheid.

1959: 1774: 1610: 1533: 35: 3968:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/9/19/un-demands-israel-end-occupation-of-palestine-how-did-your-country-vote

1057: 62: 2521:(RS reputation). As far as I am aware, it was Haaretz's other article that is the only source to dispute this. 2874: 1387: 611: 155: 3434: 1923: 1492: 925: 546: 453: 217:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the 3486:

It's not as if there is anything new here, representatives of the Israeli government do this all the time.

3394:

prohibits racial segregation and apartheid. However, … the ICJ has not decided on one of the two options."

2945:

Then add a footnote listing the media who have said that and Haaretz and the other one that says otherwise.

2934:

Art. 229 states that there's a breach of Article 3 CERD because of the separation policy - so let's have a

2291:

This is legal language, therefore every word, comma etc., must be carefully weighed. The core point is the

3657: 3593: 3506: 3457: 3471:

felt compelled to put every such accusation in quotes in this context rather than stating that as a fact.

73:

may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the

66: 3989: 3975: 3951: 3931: 3910: 3879: 3828: 3814: 3793: 3782: 3761: 3750: 3728: 3716: 3691: 3671: 3535: 3521: 3491: 3406: 3336: 3322: 3300: 3277: 3262: 3247: 3230: 3223:

A Synopsis of ICJ Finding Israel’s Occupation of Palestinian Territory in Violation of International Law

3213: 3177: 3157: 3143: 3116: 3087: 3073: 3059: 3042: 3028: 3013: 2992: 2920: 2882: 2864: 2849: 2793: 2777: 2654: 2618: 2600: 2585: 2570: 2555: 2541: 2526: 2474: 2430: 2377: 2349: 2266: 2248: 2170: 2142: 2122: 2094: 2076: 2059: 2045: 2030: 2010: 1990: 1888: 1860: 1823: 1748: 1723: 1692: 1507: 1466: 1352: 1338: 1321: 1307: 1292: 1270: 1229: 1163: 1106: 972: 928:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

687: 322:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3653: 1477: 3823:

It might be worth considering an article just for the possible effects and interpretations of the AO.

1869:

I think I’ll wait for someone with a better grasp of Knowledge (XXG) policy to help with this thanks.

3961: 2418: 1584: 1284:

is relevant, although the court may comment on other matters that were raised during the proceedings.

105: 3480:

Netanyahu frequently makes claims of antisemitism. Critics say he’s deflecting from his own problems

3331:

I am not stopping you from editing but I will add Harretz/EJIL and other counterviews in that case.

2935: 439: 137: 3550: 3433:." is just not becoming of an encyclopedia and npov. It's pushing personal interpretation as fact. 2975: 2808: 2731: 2633: 2457:

The court en toto didn't disagree on the apartheid analogy. We discussed what the court said above.

2445: 2363: 2331: 2188: 1903: 1448: 1406: 2506: 52: 3652:

The final line of the lede should have 2024 instead of 2004 for the date of the UNGA resolution.

1919: 1910:

would be a more appropriate link option? I tend towards the first option, since the ruling is on

1870: 1833: 1803: 1190: 1063: 818: 814: 810: 2153:

Apparently, this other Haaretz article disagrees and says it was both segregation and apartheid.

696: 3287:(DAWNMENA) Why the ICJ Ruling Against Israel's Occupation Is a Legal Earthquake, in Slow Motion 2307:

cases) that 'racial segregation' exists in a reality where, however, apartheid is not realized.

92: 3589: 3502: 3453: 2957: 1707: 1200: 1177: 992: 534: 1800: 679: 3985: 3971: 3947: 3927: 3906: 3852: 3824: 3810: 3778: 3746: 3712: 3667: 3531: 3517: 3487: 3402: 3332: 3318: 3311: 3296: 3273: 3258: 3243: 3226: 3209: 3188: 3173: 3153: 3139: 3112: 3098: 3083: 3069: 3055: 3038: 3024: 3009: 3003: 2988: 2916: 2878: 2860: 2845: 2789: 2773: 2766: 2650: 2614: 2596: 2581: 2566: 2551: 2537: 2522: 2492: 2470: 2426: 2394: 2373: 2345: 2262: 2244: 2199: 2166: 2138: 2118: 2111: 2090: 2072: 2055: 2041: 2026: 2006: 1884: 1874: 1856: 1837: 1819: 1807: 1744: 1718: 1687: 1503: 1462: 1375: 1348: 1334: 1317: 1316:

I'm aware, just that I think these things will be better elucidated/added in a week's time.

1303: 1288: 1266: 1246: 1238: 1225: 1159: 1138: 1102: 1078: 1059: 1025: 797: 550: 1853:

And your personal opinion does not override Knowledge (XXG)’s neutral point of view policy.

2310:

The court's determination that CERD was breached, but refrained from fingering explicitly

1580: 722: 530: 514: 2302:

Since the language of CERD Article 3 explicitly distinguishes, in writing (art.225) 'of

3546: 2971: 2804: 2752: 2727: 2711: 2629: 2485: 2441: 2401: 2359: 2327: 2206: 2184: 1444: 1434: 1402: 1347:

Can't access the article from log in nor from WP library, any other possible options?

403: 1401:

I've fixed up the itaslics in the lead but don't know how to fix them for the article.

1149:

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

4004: 3896: 3885: 3873: 3863: 3799: 3767: 3734: 3697: 3572: 3560: 3290: 1795:

The first sentence in the section “Political responses in Israel” contains a link to

1702:

Just noting that in the map on the right Turkey is grey - should be green I believe.

542: 538: 306: 2464:

RS, which almost unanimously agree that the ruling said it had amounted to apartheid

3687:

UN General Assembly passes resolution calling for Jerusalem Old City to be Jew-free

3104: 2953: 2873:

One more compromise that should settle this issue; mentioning both (2) and (3) per

1907: 1703: 1196: 1173: 526: 20: 3946:

Do we have a WP article on the latest UNGA resolution? I think we might need one.

1918:, and it still addresses the conflation of criticism of Israel with antisemitism. 189: 168: 1213: 1158:

following that precedent, don't like anything that begins "Advisory opinion...".

1902:

that any more neutral a stance. However, on a repeat look I wonder if either of

1242: 1134: 781: 760: 559:

Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran

199: 48:

account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)

3484:

Sanders hits back at Netanyahu: ‘It is not antisemitic to hold you accountable’

2987:

we should at the very least mention (2) -supported by RS- in any possible way.

2358:

That ball would go back to the ICC, which has the juridical competence to act.

51:

You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in

787: 730: 522: 296: 205: 195: 1156:

Legal consequences of Israel's policies in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

2759: 2707: 2440:

compromise, so that the cited passages must be read in terms of the latter.

2319: 1430: 1212:

would seem to be the most concise and precise way of condensing the output:

726: 290: 269: 99: 1378:

on Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories was requested to the

1172:

This is specifically about the ICJ decision rather than the general issue.

1151:

and says in Line 1 "(commonly known as the Israeli Wall advisory opinion)".

449: 445: 3448:

I think you are correct, the link appears to be inconsistent with policy.

3559:

Phase 2. In an interview re the ICJ's stop order for the Rafah invasion,

3008:

Can you please implement your proposed sentence as I am unable to do so?

1484: 3398:'Racial Segregation and Apartheid' in the ICJ Palestine Advisory Opinion 2820:(1) There are a number of RS stating that the court ruled the situation 1131:

Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

3580: 2315: 34:

procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the

2831:

in violation of the third article of CERD on segregation and apartheid

2829:(2) There is a number of RS stating that the court ruled Israel to be 1123:

Advisory opinion on Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories

3578:

Borrell accuses Netanyahu of false claims of antisemitism against ICC

562: 319: 1980:

Please change "International Court of Justice has been "hijacked by

1280:

There's not really that much else to add atm, obviously the article

703:

Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People

3962:

https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/ltd/n24/266/48/pdf/n2426648.pdf

2838:

did not rule explicitly about apartheid but only about segregation

1898:

personal opinion on whether it is or isn't weaponization wouldn't

1415:

The italics in the title was an automatic result of the template

3138:

The NYT must still be figuring out how to write a proper story.

912: 881: 1984:."" into "International Court of Justice has been "hijacked by 1429:. I changed the court case name itself in the lead to italics. 3619: 3616:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 September 2024

2460:

Haaretz, the Gross article was after the other one not before.

1947: 1762: 1598: 1521: 1064: 1019: 218: 131: 87: 15: 1759:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 July 2024 (3)

1595:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 July 2024 (2)

3225:, not the greatest of authors but interesting all the same. 2326:

against humanity', and the emission of appropriate mandates.

2117:

Haaretz, which has a conflict of interest, more due weight?

991: 971: 119: 2646:

where I expect quite a few will weigh in with time. He says

2455:

without saying the court disagreed on the apartheid analogy

1287:

Personally, I'd be inclined to wait and see what they say.

3476:

Netanyahu confronts his critics by exploiting antisemitism

2318:'separation' is coterminous with the full implications of 61:

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the

1944:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 July 2024

1518:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 July 2024

2859:

sourcing from the press with only superficial analysis.

2836:(3) There is one minor Haaretz source stating the court 1904:

Criticism of Israel#Criticism of Israel and antisemitism

1643:

UN's Special Political and Decolonization Committee vote

1127:

Advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence

569:

Articles needing translation from Hebrew Knowledge (XXG)

3449: 3135:

just mentioned systematic discrimination with no detail

3111:

I happen to personally agree with this interpretation.

392: 387: 382: 377: 112: 3023:

Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination."?

3082:

I was looking for a source that quoted the opinion.

2938:

quote of that. + an explanation of what Art. 3 says.

924:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 485:

Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005

318:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2701:words, if notable experts consider the ICJ to have 938:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject International relations

2692:I think it would be justified to add a subsection 1716:Whoops, thanks for catching that. It's fixed now. 1483:I can’t change it, but this is a horrible case of 2903:And I will say it once more, we are not going to 2772:apartheid. Would you support such a compromise? 1265:Article needs urgent expansion before 19 July.. 4066:Mid-importance International relations articles 3201: 3193: 2235: 2224: 2214: 2158: 1282:Legality of the Israeli occupation of Palestine 671:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Israel 1461:I am fine with the proposed opening sentence. 4086:Unknown-importance International law articles 1072:This page has archives. Sections older than 8: 4096:WikiProject International relations articles 941:Template:WikiProject International relations 656:Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries 2895:Law4Palestine which is a site I quite like 1382:(ICJ) through a resolution adopted by the 876: 755: 586:Israel articles missing geocoordinate data 470:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration 431:Unknown-importance Israel-related articles 411:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 365: 264: 163: 4051:Mid-importance Palestine-related articles 2340:Yes, I think that's where we are. On the 4061:B-Class International relations articles 1908:Anti-Zionism#Allegations of antisemitism 821:on Knowledge (XXG). Join us by visiting 641:Knowledge (XXG) requested maps in Israel 2423:Israel's apartheid against Palestinians 1847:I’m not able to edit the article myself 1633: 1559:2A00:23C5:E01D:F201:1CDB:C602:662D:D8BD 878: 757: 266: 165: 135: 4091:WikiProject International law articles 4036:Mid-importance Israel-related articles 2904: 2463: 2454: 2341: 1852: 1846: 1082:when more than 5 sections are present. 3809:It's para 270 on p 74 of the opinion 2966:Since we will have an expert opinion 2466:I saw one, the Guardian, what others? 839:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Palestine 825:, where you can add your name to the 7: 4011:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles 2907:overnight, we should wait for a bit. 2342:the emission of appropriate mandates 1799:. That link should not be there per 918:This article is within the scope of 803:This article is within the scope of 312:This article is within the scope of 211:This article is within the scope of 27:Warning: active arbitration remedies 4076:WikiProject United Nations articles 921:WikiProject International relations 500:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel 221:and the subjects encompassed by it. 154:It is of interest to the following 4081:B-Class International law articles 4046:B-Class Palestine-related articles 1849:Why not? Was your EC status reset? 1443:Thanks (also for the explanation). 1386:(UNGA) in December 2022." Cheers, 1210:ICJ opinion on Israel's occupation 1147:The 2004 AO re the wall is titled 425:Unassessed Israel-related articles 332:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Israel 14: 3984:Knowledge (XXG) article I meant. 2054:Jumped in there and just did it. 1076:may be automatically archived by 620:Israel articles needing attention 603:Israel articles needing infoboxes 3623: 3172:And so the repercussions begin. 2817:There is a conflict of phrasing: 2513:(all four RS per WP) as well as 1951: 1766: 1735: 1660: 1636: 1602: 1572: 1525: 1024: 944:International relations articles 911: 880: 829:where you can contribute to the 790: 780: 759: 446:Cleanup listing for this project 402: 299: 289: 268: 198: 188: 167: 136: 91: 19: 4071:B-Class United Nations articles 4031:B-Class Israel-related articles 1384:United Nations General Assembly 958:This article has been rated as 859:This article has been rated as 636:Module:Location map/data/Israel 352:This article has been rated as 247:This article has been rated as 227:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law 4056:WikiProject Palestine articles 3994:07:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 3980:13:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3956:12:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3936:12:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3915:11:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3900:06:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3891:05:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3867:05:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3833:11:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3819:11:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3805:04:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3787:20:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3773:19:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3755:19:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3740:18:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3721:18:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3703:18:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3676:22:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 3662:22:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2216:224. A number of participants 1380:International Court of Justice 842:Template:WikiProject Palestine 583:Add geographic coordinates to 497:Participate in discussions at 1: 3423:Israel and the United Nations 3103:Very interesting phrasing by 2694:Segregration versus apartheid 1797:Weaponization of antisemitism 1753:10:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 1003:WikiProject International law 1000:This article is supported by 980:This article is supported by 932:and see a list of open tasks. 326:and see a list of open tasks. 75:contentious topics procedures 3685:I came across this article " 1093:The new name is used by RS: 668:Add pictures to articles in 44:You must be logged-in to an 4041:WikiProject Israel articles 4021:Low-importance law articles 3646:to reactivate your request. 3634:has been answered. Set the 1974:to reactivate your request. 1962:has been answered. Set the 1789:to reactivate your request. 1777:has been answered. Set the 1625:to reactivate your request. 1613:has been answered. Set the 1548:to reactivate your request. 1536:has been answered. Set the 555:Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu 335:Template:WikiProject Israel 4112: 3411:11:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 2133:have given earlier, right? 983:WikiProject United Nations 964:project's importance scale 865:project's importance scale 845:Palestine-related articles 638:. Add maps to articles in 519:Diamond industry in Israel 358:project's importance scale 253:project's importance scale 63:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 3598:11:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3555:10:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3540:10:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3526:10:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3511:10:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3496:09:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3462:07:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3443:06:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 3341:22:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 3327:22:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 3305:18:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 3282:12:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 3267:11:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 3252:11:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 3235:11:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 3218:11:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 3182:21:55, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 3162:21:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 3148:21:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 3121:21:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 3092:13:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 3078:13:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 3064:13:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 3054:isn't that bad, overall. 3047:13:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 3033:13:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 3018:12:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2997:12:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2980:12:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2962:11:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2925:10:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2887:10:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2869:09:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2854:09:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2813:09:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2798:09:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2782:08:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2736:09:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 2716:23:47, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2659:22:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2638:22:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2623:22:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2605:22:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2590:22:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2575:22:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2560:21:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2546:21:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2531:21:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2479:21:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2450:21:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2435:21:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2421:can still be turned into 2382:17:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2368:16:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2354:16:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2336:16:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2271:16:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2253:15:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2193:15:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2175:15:07, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2147:15:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2127:14:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2099:13:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2081:13:14, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2064:12:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2050:12:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2035:12:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2015:09:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2001:09:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1928:21:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 1893:14:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1879:13:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1865:10:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1842:10:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1828:09:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1812:23:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 1728:23:43, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1712:09:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1697:23:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 1589:18:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 1567:16:51, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 1512:15:10, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 1497:15:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 1471:09:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 1453:03:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 1439:01:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 1411:20:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 1396:20:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 1357:21:27, 16 July 2024 (UTC) 1343:19:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 1326:11:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 1312:11:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 1297:11:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 1275:11:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 1251:14:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 1234:20:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1205:19:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1182:19:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1168:19:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1143:19:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 1111:11:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 999: 979: 957: 906: 858: 775: 364: 351: 284: 246: 183: 162: 77:before editing this page. 4026:WikiProject Law articles 1241:is a legal term of art. 578:Geographical coordinates 230:Template:WikiProject Law 71:normal editorial process 1121:Should this be renamed 935:International relations 926:International relations 888:International relations 547:Public Defence (Israel) 448:is available. See also 338:Israel-related articles 3681:Jews living in the OPT 3585: 3206: 3198: 3167:The UN commission will 2312:which of the two forms 2243: 2232: 2221: 2163: 996: 976: 144:This article is rated 125: 67:standards of behaviour 3569: 3467:the accusation. Even 3425:is a contentious one 3068:Not bad in what way? 2822:amounted to apartheid 2519:Amnesty International 1667:General Assembly vote 1425:; I disabled it with 995: 975: 806:WikiProject Palestine 369:Project Israel To Do: 148:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 123: 53:limited circumstances 36:Arab–Israeli conflict 4016:B-Class law articles 2644:at EJIL (legal blog) 2419:Israel and apartheid 1855:Neither does yours. 1331:Fronting the outcome 454:the tool's wiki page 450:the list by category 3970:and this the vote. 2642:We have one lawyer 1557:It is just a typo. 1388:Shrek 5 the divorce 718:Translate to Hebrew 3709:According to Axios 3435:ChristofferItzakah 1992:🧀The Cheesedealer 1420:Infobox court case 997: 977: 819:State of Palestine 815:Palestinian people 634:See discussion at 315:WikiProject Israel 150:content assessment 126: 46:extended confirmed 32:contentious topics 28: 3650: 3649: 2905:settle this issue 2295:in 'segregation 1978: 1977: 1793: 1792: 1629: 1628: 1552: 1551: 1194: 1086: 1085: 1051: 1050: 1018: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1010: 1009: 875: 874: 871: 870: 754: 753: 750: 749: 746: 745: 742: 741: 600:Add infoboxes to 563:Pre-Modern Aliyah 535:Sephardic Haredim 263: 262: 259: 258: 130: 129: 86: 85: 26: 4103: 3856: 3641: 3637: 3627: 3626: 3620: 3315: 3192: 3102: 3007: 2770: 2763: 2756: 2496: 2489: 2405: 2398: 2210: 2203: 2115: 1993: 1969: 1965: 1955: 1954: 1948: 1784: 1780: 1770: 1769: 1763: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1721: 1690: 1664: 1640: 1620: 1616: 1606: 1605: 1599: 1576: 1575: 1543: 1539: 1529: 1528: 1522: 1427:|italic title=no 1424: 1418: 1376:advisory opinion 1239:Advisory opinion 1188: 1081: 1065: 1042: 1041: 1028: 1020: 946: 945: 942: 939: 936: 915: 908: 907: 902: 899: 884: 877: 847: 846: 843: 840: 837: 823:the project page 800: 798:Palestine portal 795: 794: 793: 784: 777: 776: 771: 763: 756: 551:Prisoner of Zion 492:Deletion sorting 406: 399: 398: 366: 340: 339: 336: 333: 330: 309: 304: 303: 302: 293: 286: 285: 280: 272: 265: 235: 234: 231: 228: 225: 208: 203: 202: 192: 185: 184: 179: 171: 164: 147: 141: 140: 132: 115: 95: 88: 23: 16: 4111: 4110: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4001: 4000: 3944: 3942:UNGA resolution 3889: 3850: 3803: 3771: 3738: 3701: 3683: 3639: 3635: 3624: 3618: 3450:I've changed it 3418: 3309: 3186: 3125:I tracked down 3096: 3052:Middle East Eye 3001: 2764: 2757: 2750: 2748: 2507:Financial Times 2490: 2483: 2399: 2392: 2204: 2197: 2109: 2107: 2022: 1991: 1967: 1963: 1952: 1946: 1782: 1778: 1767: 1761: 1736: 1734: 1717: 1686: 1680: 1679: 1676: 1673: 1670: 1665: 1656: 1655: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1641: 1618: 1614: 1603: 1597: 1573: 1541: 1537: 1526: 1520: 1481: 1422: 1416: 1371: 1263: 1118: 1091: 1077: 1066: 1060: 1033: 943: 940: 937: 934: 933: 900: 890: 844: 841: 838: 835: 834: 827:list of members 796: 791: 789: 769: 738: 723:David Bar-Hayim 531:Rami Kleinstein 515:Ayala Procaccia 467:Participate in 397: 337: 334: 331: 328: 327: 305: 300: 298: 278: 232: 229: 226: 223: 222: 214:WikiProject Law 204: 197: 177: 145: 124:Knowledge (XXG) 111: 65:, any expected 58: 12: 11: 5: 4109: 4107: 4099: 4098: 4093: 4088: 4083: 4078: 4073: 4068: 4063: 4058: 4053: 4048: 4043: 4038: 4033: 4028: 4023: 4018: 4013: 4003: 4002: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3965: 3943: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3883: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3821: 3797: 3765: 3732: 3695: 3682: 3679: 3648: 3647: 3628: 3617: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3472: 3417: 3416:NPOV violation 3414: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3293: 3199: 3170: 3136: 3130: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2968:shortly (soon) 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2943: 2939: 2912: 2908: 2901: 2898: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2875:WP:CONFLICTING 2841: 2834: 2827: 2818: 2747: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2647: 2610: 2467: 2461: 2458: 2452: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2323: 2308: 2300: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2259: 2233: 2222: 2212: 2157: 2156: 2150: 2149: 2134: 2106: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2021: 2018: 1976: 1975: 1956: 1945: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1850: 1791: 1790: 1771: 1760: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1684: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1659: 1657: 1653: 1650: 1647: 1644: 1642: 1635: 1627: 1626: 1607: 1596: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1550: 1549: 1530: 1519: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1480: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1328: 1285: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1207: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1152: 1117: 1114: 1090: 1087: 1084: 1083: 1071: 1068: 1067: 1062: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1035: 1034: 1029: 1023: 1016: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1008: 1007: 998: 988: 987: 978: 968: 967: 960:Mid-importance 956: 950: 949: 947: 930:the discussion 916: 904: 903: 901:Mid‑importance 893:United Nations 885: 873: 872: 869: 868: 861:Mid-importance 857: 851: 850: 848: 802: 801: 785: 773: 772: 770:Mid‑importance 764: 752: 751: 748: 747: 744: 743: 740: 739: 737: 736: 735: 734: 713: 705: 692: 675: 658: 645: 624: 607: 590: 573: 565: 504: 487: 474: 457: 435: 410: 408: 407: 396: 395: 390: 385: 380: 374: 371: 370: 362: 361: 354:Mid-importance 350: 344: 343: 341: 324:the discussion 311: 310: 294: 282: 281: 279:Mid‑importance 273: 261: 260: 257: 256: 249:Low-importance 245: 239: 238: 236: 210: 209: 193: 181: 180: 178:Low‑importance 172: 160: 159: 153: 142: 128: 127: 117: 96: 84: 83: 57: 56: 49: 41: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4108: 4097: 4094: 4092: 4089: 4087: 4084: 4082: 4079: 4077: 4074: 4072: 4069: 4067: 4064: 4062: 4059: 4057: 4054: 4052: 4049: 4047: 4044: 4042: 4039: 4037: 4034: 4032: 4029: 4027: 4024: 4022: 4019: 4017: 4014: 4012: 4009: 4008: 4006: 3995: 3991: 3987: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3966: 3963: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3953: 3949: 3941: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3924: 3923: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3898: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3887: 3882: 3881: 3875: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3865: 3860: 3859:actual motion 3854: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3822: 3820: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3801: 3796: 3795: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3769: 3764: 3763: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3736: 3731: 3730: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3699: 3694: 3693: 3688: 3680: 3678: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3664: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3645: 3642:parameter to 3633: 3629: 3622: 3621: 3615: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3586: 3584: 3583:27 May 2024. 3582: 3579: 3574: 3568: 3562: 3561:Josep Borrell 3558: 3557: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3508: 3504: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3470: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3431:weaponization 3428: 3424: 3415: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3399: 3395: 3392: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3313: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3294: 3292: 3291:Michael Sfard 3288: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3242: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3208: 3205: 3200: 3197: 3190: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3168: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3134: 3131: 3128: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3100: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3005: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2944: 2940: 2937: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2913: 2909: 2906: 2902: 2899: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2842: 2839: 2835: 2832: 2828: 2825: 2823: 2819: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2768: 2761: 2754: 2746:Middle ground 2745: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2704: 2699: 2695: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2645: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2611: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2503:The Intercept 2500: 2494: 2487: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2465: 2462: 2459: 2456: 2453: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2403: 2396: 2391: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2324: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2241: 2234: 2231: 2230: 2223: 2220: 2219: 2213: 2208: 2201: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2162: 2155: 2152: 2151: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2135: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2113: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2019: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2003: 2002: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1994: 1987: 1983: 1973: 1970:parameter to 1961: 1957: 1950: 1949: 1943: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1920:Benjitheijneb 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1851: 1848: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1788: 1785:parameter to 1776: 1772: 1765: 1764: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1720: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1689: 1663: 1658: 1639: 1634: 1632: 1624: 1621:parameter to 1612: 1608: 1601: 1600: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1579: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1547: 1544:parameter to 1535: 1531: 1524: 1523: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1489:86.31.178.164 1486: 1479: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1421: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1368: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1329: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1260: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1222:The Economist 1219: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1192: 1191:edit conflict 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1088: 1080: 1075: 1070: 1069: 1055: 1054: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1027: 1022: 1021: 1005: 1004: 994: 990: 989: 985: 984: 974: 970: 969: 965: 961: 955: 952: 951: 948: 931: 927: 923: 922: 917: 914: 910: 909: 905: 898: 894: 889: 886: 883: 879: 866: 862: 856: 853: 852: 849: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 807: 799: 788: 786: 783: 779: 778: 774: 768: 765: 762: 758: 732: 728: 724: 721: 719: 715: 714: 712: 710: 706: 704: 701: 699: 698: 693: 690: 689: 684: 682: 681: 676: 673: 672: 667: 665: 664: 659: 657: 654: 652: 651: 646: 643: 642: 637: 633: 631: 630: 625: 622: 621: 616: 614: 613: 608: 605: 604: 599: 597: 596: 591: 588: 587: 582: 580: 579: 574: 571: 570: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 544: 543:Nachum Heiman 540: 539:Zman Tel Aviv 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 513: 511: 510: 505: 502: 501: 496: 494: 493: 488: 486: 483: 481: 480: 475: 472: 471: 466: 464: 463: 458: 455: 451: 447: 444: 442: 441: 436: 433: 432: 427: 426: 421: 419: 418: 413: 412: 409: 405: 401: 400: 394: 391: 389: 386: 384: 381: 379: 376: 375: 373: 372: 368: 367: 363: 359: 355: 349: 346: 345: 342: 325: 321: 317: 316: 308: 307:Israel portal 297: 295: 292: 288: 287: 283: 277: 274: 271: 267: 254: 250: 244: 241: 240: 237: 220: 216: 215: 207: 201: 196: 194: 191: 187: 186: 182: 176: 173: 170: 166: 161: 157: 151: 143: 139: 134: 133: 122: 118: 114: 109: 108: 107: 101: 97: 94: 90: 89: 82: 78: 76: 72: 68: 64: 59: 54: 50: 47: 43: 42: 39: 37: 33: 25: 22: 18: 17: 3945: 3878: 3849: 3792: 3760: 3727: 3690: 3684: 3665: 3654:UniformLimit 3651: 3643: 3632:edit request 3590:Sean.hoyland 3570: 3503:Sean.hoyland 3454:Sean.hoyland 3430: 3419: 3396: 3389: 3202: 3194: 3105:Kenneth Roth 2837: 2830: 2824: 2821: 2749: 2702: 2693: 2691: 2499:The Guardian 2311: 2303: 2296: 2292: 2239: 2236: 2228: 2225: 2217: 2215: 2164: 2161:"apartheid." 2159: 2108: 2023: 2004: 1995: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1979: 1971: 1960:edit request 1915: 1911: 1899: 1794: 1786: 1775:edit request 1740: 1683: 1630: 1622: 1611:edit request 1578:Already done 1577: 1556: 1553: 1545: 1534:edit request 1482: 1426: 1372: 1264: 1092: 1073: 1030: 1001: 981: 959: 919: 860: 813:region, the 804: 717: 716: 708: 707: 695: 694: 688:Israel stubs 686: 678: 677: 669: 661: 660: 648: 647: 639: 627: 626: 618: 610: 609: 601: 593: 592: 584: 576: 575: 567: 527:Levin Kipnis 507: 506: 498: 490: 489: 477: 476: 468: 460: 459: 438: 437: 429: 423: 415: 414: 353: 313: 248: 233:law articles 212: 156:WikiProjects 113:20 July 2024 104: 103: 79: 60: 40: 29: 3986:Makeandtoss 3972:Selfstudier 3964:This be it. 3948:Makeandtoss 3928:Makeandtoss 3907:Selfstudier 3853:Vice regent 3825:Selfstudier 3811:Selfstudier 3779:Selfstudier 3747:Selfstudier 3713:Selfstudier 3668:Selfstudier 3532:Iskandar323 3518:Selfstudier 3488:Selfstudier 3403:Selfstudier 3333:Selfstudier 3319:Makeandtoss 3312:Selfstudier 3297:Selfstudier 3274:Makeandtoss 3259:Selfstudier 3244:Makeandtoss 3227:Selfstudier 3210:Makeandtoss 3196:apartheid”. 3189:Selfstudier 3174:Selfstudier 3154:Makeandtoss 3140:Selfstudier 3113:Makeandtoss 3099:Selfstudier 3084:Selfstudier 3070:Makeandtoss 3056:Selfstudier 3039:Selfstudier 3025:Makeandtoss 3010:Makeandtoss 3004:Selfstudier 2989:Makeandtoss 2917:Selfstudier 2879:Makeandtoss 2861:Selfstudier 2846:Makeandtoss 2790:Selfstudier 2774:Makeandtoss 2767:Selfstudier 2703:effectively 2696:within the 2651:Selfstudier 2615:Selfstudier 2597:Selfstudier 2582:Selfstudier 2567:Selfstudier 2552:Selfstudier 2538:Selfstudier 2523:Makeandtoss 2493:Selfstudier 2471:Selfstudier 2427:Makeandtoss 2395:Selfstudier 2374:Selfstudier 2346:Selfstudier 2263:Selfstudier 2245:Makeandtoss 2200:Selfstudier 2167:Selfstudier 2139:Selfstudier 2119:Makeandtoss 2112:Selfstudier 2091:Selfstudier 2073:Makeandtoss 2056:Iskandar323 2042:Iskandar323 2027:Makeandtoss 2007:Selfstudier 1982:islamicists 1914:and not on 1885:Selfstudier 1857:Selfstudier 1820:Selfstudier 1745:Bunnypranav 1719:SheepTester 1688:SheepTester 1504:Selfstudier 1478:WP:REFERSTO 1463:Makeandtoss 1349:Makeandtoss 1335:Selfstudier 1318:Selfstudier 1304:Makeandtoss 1289:Selfstudier 1267:Makeandtoss 1226:Iskandar323 1160:Selfstudier 1125:? See e.g. 1103:Makeandtoss 1089:Name change 1079:ClueBot III 831:discussions 462:Collaborate 219:legal field 110:section on 106:In the news 4005:Categories 3636:|answered= 2936:WP:PRIMARY 1964:|answered= 1779:|answered= 1615:|answered= 1581:Left guide 1538:|answered= 1333:as usual. 731:Guy Oseary 523:Edna Arbel 206:Law portal 3888:on reply) 3802:on reply) 3770:on reply) 3737:on reply) 3700:on reply) 3547:Nishidani 3474:Also see 3427:with bias 3204:B’Tselem. 2972:Nishidani 2805:Nishidani 2753:Nishidani 2728:Nishidani 2698:#Analyses 2630:Nishidani 2486:Nishidani 2442:Nishidani 2402:Nishidani 2360:Nishidani 2328:Nishidani 2320:apartheid 2207:Nishidani 2185:Nishidani 2105:Apartheid 1986:Islamists 1445:Nishidani 1403:Nishidani 1261:Expansion 1154:I prefer 1046:Archive 1 836:Palestine 811:Palestine 767:Palestine 727:Guy Bavli 566:See also 422:Rate the 100:Main Page 69:, or any 3884:(Please 3874:Zero0000 3798:(Please 3766:(Please 3733:(Please 3696:(Please 2893:Here is 2628:opinion. 1485:REFERSTO 1218:Reuters 1031:Archives 817:and the 612:Maintain 479:Copyedit 81:covered. 3581:i24NEWS 3573:Borrell 3564:linked- 3469:Haaretz 2954:DeCausa 2316:hafrada 1916:Zionism 1801:WP:NPOV 1704:DeCausa 1675:Abstain 1672:Against 1669:Approve 1651:Abstain 1648:Against 1645:Approve 1197:DeCausa 1174:DeCausa 1074:90 days 962:on the 863:on the 595:Infobox 440:Cleanup 383:history 356:on the 251:on the 146:B-class 102:in the 3666:Done. 2005:Done. 1988:."" — 1912:Israel 1871:Amisom 1834:Amisom 1804:Amisom 1678:Absent 1654:Absent 1502:Done. 1243:Kaihsu 1135:Kaihsu 729:, and 697:Update 509:Expand 417:Assess 329:Israel 320:Israel 276:Israel 152:scale. 3640:|ans= 3630:This 3289:] by 3133:MSNBC 2911:lead. 2515:Oxfam 2020:Lede2 1968:|ans= 1958:This 1783:|ans= 1773:This 1619:|ans= 1609:This 1542:|ans= 1532:This 1116:Move? 1039:Index 709:Other 680:Stubs 663:Photo 393:purge 388:watch 3990:talk 3976:talk 3952:talk 3932:talk 3911:talk 3897:Zero 3886:ping 3864:Zero 3857:The 3829:talk 3815:talk 3800:ping 3783:talk 3768:ping 3751:talk 3735:ping 3717:talk 3698:ping 3672:talk 3658:talk 3594:talk 3551:talk 3536:talk 3522:talk 3507:talk 3492:talk 3482:and 3478:and 3458:talk 3439:talk 3407:talk 3337:talk 3323:talk 3301:talk 3278:talk 3263:talk 3248:talk 3231:talk 3214:talk 3178:talk 3158:talk 3144:talk 3127:WAPO 3117:talk 3088:talk 3074:talk 3060:talk 3043:talk 3029:talk 3014:talk 2993:talk 2976:talk 2958:talk 2952:No? 2921:talk 2883:talk 2865:talk 2850:talk 2809:talk 2794:talk 2778:talk 2760:Boud 2732:talk 2712:talk 2708:Boud 2655:talk 2634:talk 2619:talk 2601:talk 2586:talk 2571:talk 2556:talk 2542:talk 2527:talk 2517:and 2509:and 2475:talk 2446:talk 2431:talk 2414:day. 2378:talk 2364:talk 2350:talk 2332:talk 2267:talk 2249:talk 2189:talk 2171:talk 2143:talk 2123:talk 2095:talk 2077:talk 2060:talk 2046:talk 2031:talk 2011:talk 1924:talk 1900:make 1889:talk 1875:talk 1861:talk 1838:talk 1824:talk 1808:talk 1749:talk 1741:Done 1724:talk 1708:talk 1693:talk 1585:talk 1563:talk 1508:talk 1493:talk 1467:talk 1449:talk 1435:talk 1431:Boud 1407:talk 1392:talk 1369:Lede 1353:talk 1339:talk 1322:talk 1308:talk 1293:talk 1271:talk 1247:talk 1230:talk 1201:talk 1178:talk 1164:talk 1139:talk 1107:talk 685:See 650:NPOV 617:See 452:and 428:and 378:edit 30:The 3638:or 2511:HRW 2304:two 1966:or 1906:or 1781:or 1617:or 1540:or 1214:BBC 954:Mid 897:Law 855:Mid 629:Map 348:Mid 243:Low 224:Law 175:Law 4007:: 3992:) 3978:) 3954:) 3934:) 3913:) 3880:VR 3831:) 3817:) 3794:VR 3785:) 3762:VR 3753:) 3729:VR 3719:) 3692:VR 3674:) 3660:) 3644:no 3596:) 3553:) 3538:) 3524:) 3509:) 3494:) 3460:) 3452:. 3441:) 3409:) 3339:) 3325:) 3303:) 3280:) 3265:) 3250:) 3233:) 3216:) 3180:) 3160:) 3146:) 3119:) 3090:) 3076:) 3062:) 3045:) 3031:) 3016:) 2995:) 2978:) 2960:) 2942:RS 2923:) 2885:) 2867:) 2852:) 2811:) 2796:) 2780:) 2734:) 2714:) 2657:) 2636:) 2621:) 2603:) 2588:) 2573:) 2558:) 2544:) 2529:) 2505:, 2501:, 2477:) 2448:) 2433:) 2380:) 2366:) 2352:) 2334:) 2297:or 2293:or 2269:) 2251:) 2191:) 2173:) 2145:) 2125:) 2097:) 2079:) 2071:. 2062:) 2048:) 2033:) 2013:) 1972:no 1926:) 1891:) 1877:) 1863:) 1840:) 1826:) 1810:) 1787:no 1751:) 1726:) 1710:) 1695:) 1623:no 1587:) 1565:) 1546:no 1510:) 1495:) 1469:) 1451:) 1437:) 1423:}} 1417:{{ 1409:) 1394:) 1355:) 1341:) 1324:) 1310:) 1295:) 1273:) 1249:) 1232:) 1224:. 1220:, 1216:, 1203:) 1180:) 1166:) 1141:) 1133:. 1129:, 1109:) 1099:, 1096:, 895:/ 891:: 725:, 561:, 557:, 553:, 549:, 545:, 541:, 537:, 533:, 529:, 525:, 521:, 517:, 3988:( 3974:( 3950:( 3930:( 3909:( 3872:@ 3855:: 3851:@ 3827:( 3813:( 3781:( 3749:( 3715:( 3670:( 3656:( 3592:( 3571:‘ 3549:( 3534:( 3520:( 3505:( 3490:( 3456:( 3437:( 3405:( 3335:( 3321:( 3314:: 3310:@ 3299:( 3276:( 3261:( 3246:( 3229:( 3212:( 3191:: 3187:@ 3176:( 3156:( 3142:( 3115:( 3101:: 3097:@ 3086:( 3072:( 3058:( 3041:( 3027:( 3012:( 3006:: 3002:@ 2991:( 2974:( 2956:( 2919:( 2881:( 2863:( 2848:( 2840:. 2833:. 2826:. 2807:( 2792:( 2776:( 2769:: 2765:@ 2762:: 2758:@ 2755:: 2751:@ 2730:( 2710:( 2653:( 2632:( 2617:( 2599:( 2584:( 2569:( 2554:( 2540:( 2525:( 2495:: 2491:@ 2488:: 2484:@ 2473:( 2444:( 2429:( 2404:: 2400:@ 2397:: 2393:@ 2376:( 2362:( 2348:( 2330:( 2322:. 2265:( 2247:( 2209:: 2205:@ 2202:: 2198:@ 2187:( 2169:( 2141:( 2121:( 2114:: 2110:@ 2093:( 2075:( 2058:( 2044:( 2029:( 2009:( 1922:( 1887:( 1873:( 1859:( 1836:( 1822:( 1806:( 1747:( 1722:( 1706:( 1691:( 1583:( 1561:( 1506:( 1491:( 1465:( 1447:( 1433:( 1405:( 1390:( 1351:( 1337:( 1320:( 1306:( 1291:( 1269:( 1245:( 1228:( 1199:( 1193:) 1189:( 1176:( 1162:( 1137:( 1105:( 1006:. 986:. 966:. 867:. 833:. 733:. 720:: 711:: 700:: 691:. 683:: 674:. 666:: 653:: 644:. 632:: 623:. 615:: 606:. 598:: 589:. 581:: 572:. 512:: 503:. 495:: 482:: 473:. 465:: 456:. 443:: 434:. 420:: 360:. 255:. 158:: 116:. 55:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.