395:, hi. I just want to flag that this is about to become (if it hasn't already become) a high traffic article due to the subject being convicted on seven corruption charges a couple of hours ago. I had earlier noted that the section on court cases needs expansion, and I'm working on that. Also, I also just realized that the entire section titled "First Lady" was skewed to the positive because the subheading "projects during", which results in text which describes projects within the time period described. A heading titled "roles during..." or "public life during..." would result in a less-skewed narrative. But that's a lot of work and I need to brace myself a bit before I dive into that. Not sure what that implies for this GA review since I don't normally involve myself in these. But I thought it was important to mention. -
231:, and so on. (That's a big "so on", which is why I wanted to do more reading) There's a lot of work that needs to be done to be able to correct for these ommissions while retaining WP:NPOV. I'm sort of glad this review is happening because I'm hoping it'll bring up the things in the article that need work. -
226:
tag more closely, I just realized that I should have tagged it with undue weight instead. (If it's under review like this, is it okay to change the tag?) Simply, the section is far too long in comparison to other, better-documented sections. My personal take is that if there's any reason this page
410:
Ah, well in the case where significant developments happen after an article has been promoted, and the original nominator isn't around anymore, I guess there isn't much to do unless someone else takes it up. One of the reasons why I usually refrain from reviewing articles about living people... Too
271:- I've discovered that one of the paragraphs subsumed under the vague heading "power struggle" actually mentions one of the court cases, but only one of them. So I've subsumed that paragraph under a new section, and then added a cleanup template indicating there are multiple unmentioned casees.-
118:, with no original research. There are far too many citations to books that are missing page numbers, and one section ("A way to fame") that has no citations at all. In addition, someone else has tagged the "Role in Ferdinand Marcos's 1965 presidential campaign" section as
128:
so you probably need to split that into subsections. I don't know how long a typical reassessment period lasts, so let's say two weeks. If these issues are not addressed by 17 November 2018 (UTC) then the article will be delisted from GA status.
293:″ (which covers the events of August 1983 and their immediate aftermath; I should add that although there were notable ″power struggles″ between Imelda and other figures in the late 70s, that's not what the text actually describes) and ″
411:
much inherent instability. In any case, yes, it was a bit suspect that the original nominator was called "Imeldific", and I'd just like to make clear that I have no horse in the race when it comes to the subject matter.
202:
Hehe, that makes me fear that my brain has deteriorated since in more than one way... I'd still question whether it warrants demotion because of that, but in any case, it is best to have the numbers.
153:
GA is more lax when it comes to various issues, such as giving exact page ranges, than FAC, but of course, can't hurt to add. As for a section being "too long", well, that's pretty subjective.
297:″ (1986 and onward). I also added cleanup templates because these sections have great historical significance, as acknowledged in most academic texts on the Marcos administration. -
253:
section. I retained the date of the old tag since I simply put in the wrong tag by mistake, but this can be changed to a newer date if that's a more appropriate procedure.-
441:
I'm afraid I must concur. A lot of work is going into the article right now, but I have no sense of whether or not it'll get up to the standards needed for a GA. -
216:
To be honest, I've wanted to do work on this article for a long time now, but I was building up a familiarity with the literature on Imelda Marcos. Looking at the
346:
I think it's fine to change the tag. The goal here is to get the article quality back up to GA standards, so we should do whatever is necessary to that end.
228:
95:
91:
289:- The section previously titled ″Power struggle″ was vaguely titled to the point of obfuscation, so I separated it into two sections: ″
76:
318:
I'd argue that any yellow-level or higher maintenance tag is enough to warrant delisting. Since I would be justified in putting
111:
227:
should be demoted from GA, it's the lack of coverage of key topics, such as the cases in the US, the plunder cases filed the
68:
55:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
522:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
322:
39:
250:
171:, who may want to weigh in on this. However, I notice that you had brought up the lack of page numbers in the
446:
400:
302:
276:
258:
236:
35:
172:
489:
332:
508:
426:
Given the current state of the article, I fully support a demotion. It is Start Class, no higher.
461:
442:
416:
396:
358:
341:
298:
272:
254:
232:
207:
191:
168:
158:
141:
84:
17:
503:
length. The general rule is 4 paragraphs, and the lede is just 2 sentences longer than that. -
431:
220:
122:
485:
504:
500:
481:
176:
477:
456:
412:
390:
382:
350:
313:
203:
183:
154:
133:
61:
427:
115:
512:
493:
468:
450:
435:
420:
404:
364:
306:
280:
262:
240:
211:
197:
162:
147:
43:
455:
I've gone ahead and de-tagged it. This does not meet WIAGA criteria. --
251:
Imelda_Marcos#Role_in_Ferdinand_Marcos's_1965_presidential_campaign
34:
Consensus to delist came in 2018, but this was incorrectly closed.
476:
For sure it is not GA with the overall negativity in lede (
287:
Breakup of ″Power struggle″ into two further subsections
103:
72:
249:- I've gone on and revised the tag that was in the
269:New section on court cases, plus cleanup template
179:claimed "Done", but apparently it never was.
8:
247:Replacement of tag in 1965 Campaign section
229:Presidential Commission on Good Government
7:
51:The following discussion is closed.
295:EDSA Revolution, ouster, and exile
24:
338:tags is functionally equivalent.
110:Currently this article fails the
518:The discussion above is closed.
1:
513:08:39, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
494:18:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
480:violation) and the excessive
44:23:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
469:18:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
451:17:43, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
436:17:30, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
421:09:43, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
405:08:55, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
365:20:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
307:16:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
281:13:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
263:10:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
241:10:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
212:03:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
198:03:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
163:08:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
148:03:39, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
537:
499:I don't think it violates
291:Ninoy Aquino assassination
520:Please do not modify it.
328:on it, a whole bunch of
53:Please do not modify it.
112:Good article criteria
36:~~ AirshipJungleman29
323:Page numbers needed
173:previous assessment
167:That was added by
114:, particularly 2:
54:
18:Talk:Imelda Marcos
362:
195:
145:
52:
528:
459:
394:
386:
363:
356:
353:
345:
337:
331:
327:
321:
317:
225:
219:
196:
189:
186:
146:
139:
136:
127:
121:
108:
99:
80:
536:
535:
531:
530:
529:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
457:
388:
380:
351:
347:
339:
335:
329:
325:
319:
311:
223:
217:
184:
180:
134:
130:
125:
119:
89:
66:
60:
57:
48:
47:
46:
29:
27:GA Reassessment
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
534:
532:
517:
516:
515:
474:
473:
472:
471:
424:
423:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
283:
265:
109:
58:
49:
33:
32:
31:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
533:
521:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
497:
496:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
470:
467:
466:
465:
460:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
443:Alternativity
440:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
422:
418:
414:
409:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
397:Alternativity
392:
384:
366:
360:
355:
354:
343:
342:Alternativity
334:
324:
315:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
299:Alternativity
296:
292:
288:
284:
282:
278:
274:
273:Alternativity
270:
266:
264:
260:
256:
255:Alternativity
252:
248:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
233:Alternativity
230:
222:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
200:
199:
193:
188:
187:
178:
174:
170:
169:Alternativity
166:
165:
164:
160:
156:
152:
151:
150:
149:
143:
138:
137:
124:
117:
113:
107:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
87:
83:
78:
74:
70:
65:
64:
56:
45:
41:
37:
26:
19:
519:
475:
463:
462:
425:
379:
349:
294:
290:
286:
268:
246:
182:
132:
104:
100:
86:Article talk
85:
81:
62:
59:
50:
333:page needed
175:, to which
73:visual edit
486:Jtbobwaysf
116:Verifiable
505:Object404
177:Imeldific
484:length.
413:FunkMonk
391:FunkMonk
383:Howcheng
352:howcheng
314:FunkMonk
221:too long
204:FunkMonk
185:howcheng
155:FunkMonk
135:howcheng
123:too long
501:WP:LEDE
482:WP:LEDE
428:Mjroots
96:history
77:history
63:Article
478:WP:BLP
458:Jayron
105:Watch
16:<
509:talk
490:talk
447:talk
432:talk
417:talk
401:talk
387:and
359:chat
303:talk
277:talk
259:talk
237:talk
208:talk
192:chat
159:talk
142:chat
92:edit
69:edit
40:talk
511:)
492:)
464:32
449:)
434:)
419:)
403:)
336:}}
330:{{
326:}}
320:{{
305:)
285:*
279:)
267:*
261:)
245:*
239:)
224:}}
218:{{
210:)
161:)
126:}}
120:{{
94:|
75:|
71:|
42:)
507:(
488:(
445:(
430:(
415:(
399:(
393::
389:@
385::
381:@
361:}
357:{
348:—
344::
340:@
316::
312:@
301:(
275:(
257:(
235:(
206:(
194:}
190:{
181:—
157:(
144:}
140:{
131:—
101:·
98:)
90:(
82:·
79:)
67:(
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.