Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Importance

Source đź“ť

284:
setting, judgment, taste, goal selection, credit assignment, the selection of relevant memories and precedents, and learning from experience. AI has for the most part focused on logic and reasoning in artificial situations where only relevant variables and operators are specified and has paid insufficient attention to processes of reducing the richness and disorganization of the real world to a form where logical reasoning can be applied ... AI has for the most part neglected these sorts of issues. And I think this is a serious problem, because it raises the question about whether AI, if it continues on its current course, is really up to the challenge of fulfilling its stated long term goals ... What humans think is important really ought to have a role in AI—how could it not?
343:
man's game. It's hard to describe just how dated the state of AI in 1999 compared to now is; it'd be like citing an automobile engineer writing in 1920 about car technology. More generally, I don't get the impression that among current computer scientists, "importance" in the broad sense is even an issue on their minds. It's reaching too far. Right now, AI is struggling to do things like merely distinguish whether that's a pedestrian about to dart out into the street, or an advertisement banner depicting a person on the wall; the second-order question of importance can't even be asked until you're sure whether that person is real or not. But that's just my personal impression of the state of the art in the field.
238: 222: 206: 190: 22: 92: 53: 102: 280:
and thanks for taking a detailed look at the article. I saw that you removed the section on "Artificial intelligence" based on the claim that it overemphasizes the role of "importance" in this field. I think you may be right. But it is also true that importance plays some role in this field. Here are
357:
Thanks for the response, better late than never. I don't fully agree with you but I understand your concerns and I'm no expert in this field. This is probably the least important part of the article so not too much is lost by leaving it out. Maybe we can pick the topic up again if I or someone else
342:
computer scientist. David Waltz was writing in 1999 with "The Importance of Importance", which was an eternity ago in AI years, and even worse, Waltz was nearly 60 at the time, making me suspicious of even treating him as an authority on 1999-era tech. Computer science has a reputation as a young
283:
Human intelligence is shaped by what is most important to us -- the things that cause ecstasy, despair, pleasure, pain, and other intense emotions. The ability to separate the important from the unimportant underlies such faculties as attention, focusing, situation and outcome assessment, priority
288:
In the light of this, I hope we can restore a modified version of this section. The following proposal makes a few changes to the first sentence, no changes to the second, and completely replaces the third (and thus removes the controversial passages you mentioned):
297:, one challenge for some complex real-world applications is to implement artificial reasoning based on importance. This concerns, for example, the problem of distinguishing important from unimportant shapes in the process of 545: 313:
I appreciate you taking the time to help fix this issue. Please let me know if these changes are in your eyes sufficient to properly represent the source or if more changes are needed.
550: 530: 123:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
305:. According to David Waltz, advances in artificial importance reasoning are necessary to close some of the gaps in fields where artificial intelligence still lacks behind 540: 535: 245: 75: 213: 67: 197: 160: 63: 525: 335:
Hi, sorry about the slow reply! Your ping didn't seem to work - I didn't get a notification. So I only noticed now after the bot update to add reflist talk.
515: 229: 71: 500: 490: 150: 520: 125: 505: 464: 510: 495: 485: 338:
I appreciate you're working in good faith on this one, but if a passage was restored on the topic, I'd really prefer for it to come from a
115: 58: 266: 33: 39: 294: 458: 21: 348: 306: 447: 409: 389: 363: 318: 298: 107: 439: 401: 428:"Fed-Fi: Federated Learning Malicious Model Detection Method Based on Feature Importance" 237: 221: 205: 189: 479: 427: 344: 277: 359: 330: 314: 281:
some quotations from the source "The Importance of Importance" by David Waltz:
302: 120: 97: 450: 412: 405: 443: 119:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 91: 52: 367: 352: 322: 426:
Zhou, Chuanxin; Sun, Yi; Wang, Degang; Gao, Qi (18 May 2022).
15: 390:"AAAI-98 Presidential Address: The Importance of Importance" 236: 220: 204: 188: 358:
stumbles on a more contemporary article on this issue.
171: 546:Mid-importance Contemporary philosophy articles 291: 8: 129:about philosophy content on Knowledge (XXG). 551:Contemporary philosophy task force articles 531:Mid-importance Analytic philosophy articles 168: 47: 541:B-Class Contemporary philosophy articles 536:Analytic philosophy task force articles 380: 49: 19: 456: 282: 135:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philosophy 7: 526:B-Class Analytic philosophy articles 113:This article is within the scope of 516:Mid-importance metaphysics articles 432:Security and Communication Networks 38:It is of interest to the following 501:Mid-importance Aesthetics articles 491:Mid-importance Philosophy articles 463:: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI ( 388:Waltz, David (15 September 1999). 301:when trying to simulate a form of 265:For the previous discussions, see 14: 267:Talk:Importance (disambiguation) 100: 90: 51: 20: 521:Metaphysics task force articles 155:This article has been rated as 138:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 506:Aesthetics task force articles 368:14:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC) 353:12:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC) 1: 511:B-Class metaphysics articles 496:B-Class Aesthetics articles 486:B-Class Philosophy articles 567: 161:project's importance scale 244: 228: 212: 196: 167: 154: 85: 46: 406:10.1609/aimag.v20i3.1464 323:04:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC) 295:artificial intelligence 272:Artificial intelligence 246:Contemporary philosophy 172:Associated task forces: 311: 241: 225: 209: 193: 116:WikiProject Philosophy 28:This article is rated 240: 224: 208: 192: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 444:10.1155/2022/7268347 230:Analytic philosophy 141:Philosophy articles 307:human intelligence 242: 226: 210: 194: 126:general discussion 34:content assessment 299:image recognition 263: 262: 259: 258: 255: 254: 251: 250: 108:Philosophy portal 558: 469: 468: 462: 454: 423: 417: 416: 385: 334: 293:In the field of 179: 169: 143: 142: 139: 136: 133: 110: 105: 104: 103: 94: 87: 86: 81: 78: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 566: 565: 561: 560: 559: 557: 556: 555: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 455: 425: 424: 420: 387: 386: 382: 328: 274: 177: 140: 137: 134: 131: 130: 106: 101: 99: 79: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 564: 562: 554: 553: 548: 543: 538: 533: 528: 523: 518: 513: 508: 503: 498: 493: 488: 478: 477: 471: 470: 418: 379: 378: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 336: 273: 270: 261: 260: 257: 256: 253: 252: 249: 248: 243: 233: 232: 227: 217: 216: 211: 201: 200: 195: 185: 184: 182: 180: 174: 173: 165: 164: 157:Mid-importance 153: 147: 146: 144: 112: 111: 95: 83: 82: 80:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 563: 552: 549: 547: 544: 542: 539: 537: 534: 532: 529: 527: 524: 522: 519: 517: 514: 512: 509: 507: 504: 502: 499: 497: 494: 492: 489: 487: 484: 483: 481: 466: 460: 452: 449: 445: 441: 437: 433: 429: 422: 419: 414: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 384: 381: 377: 369: 365: 361: 356: 355: 354: 350: 346: 341: 337: 332: 327: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 310: 308: 304: 300: 296: 290: 286: 285: 279: 271: 269: 268: 247: 239: 235: 234: 231: 223: 219: 218: 215: 207: 203: 202: 199: 191: 187: 186: 183: 181: 176: 175: 170: 166: 162: 158: 152: 149: 148: 145: 128: 127: 122: 118: 117: 109: 98: 96: 93: 89: 88: 84: 77: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 459:cite journal 438:: e7268347. 435: 431: 421: 400:(3): 18–18. 397: 393: 383: 375: 339: 312: 292: 287: 275: 264: 156: 124: 114: 76:Contemporary 40:WikiProjects 394:AI Magazine 214:Metaphysics 68:Metaphysics 480:Categories 376:References 303:perception 198:Aesthetics 132:Philosophy 121:philosophy 64:Aesthetics 59:Philosophy 451:1939-0114 413:2371-9621 345:SnowFire 278:SnowFire 72:Analytic 360:Phlsph7 340:current 331:Phlsph7 315:Phlsph7 159:on the 30:B-class 276:Hello 36:scale. 465:link 448:ISSN 436:2022 410:ISSN 364:talk 349:talk 319:talk 440:doi 402:doi 151:Mid 482:: 461:}} 457:{{ 446:. 434:. 430:. 408:. 398:20 396:. 392:. 366:) 351:) 321:) 178:/ 74:/ 70:/ 66:/ 62:: 467:) 453:. 442:: 415:. 404:: 362:( 347:( 333:: 329:@ 317:( 309:. 163:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Philosophy
Aesthetics
Metaphysics
Analytic
Contemporary
WikiProject icon
Philosophy portal
WikiProject Philosophy
philosophy
general discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
Aesthetics
Taskforce icon
Metaphysics
Taskforce icon
Analytic philosophy
Taskforce icon
Contemporary philosophy
Talk:Importance (disambiguation)
SnowFire
artificial intelligence
image recognition
perception
human intelligence

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑