Knowledge

Talk:Impulse

Source 📝

39: 21: 181:
and is now a redirect. Completing the move of this dab page was contested on the grounds of being potentially controversial. Per the previous comment above, the word "impulse" is used as a title for many different subjects, and there is no demonstration of any primary topic. Hence, in lieu of any
222:
The name of that page is not really the issue -- editors can rename it as they wish and I have no preference. The issue is that even in the field of science, the term "impulse" can refer to multiple subjects, as listed on the dab page. Hence, a name like
347:, because that's just a bad name (of which I definitely agree with those people). However, I don't think there's any consensus to move the pages, because I and Cardamon stated that we would like the article restored to 208:
better as the title for the physics article.) I notice that, if the move is made now, a lot of pages that were pointing to the physics article will be left pointing to a disambiguation page.
484: 65: 107:
may be just as important, or more. Shouldn't it be the case to let ] be this disamb page, and rename the current ] article to ]? All the best, --
227:
would still be ambiguous -- are you looking for the concept in mechanics or electromagnetism? Are either one of these used more commonly than
428:
there are objections to the initial page move, saying that "mechanical impulse" is a neologism, and that the page move should be reversed...
61: 46: 26: 339:
I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that it should be moved based on naming discussions. I believe what others are saying is that
377: 429: 393:. In reading the above, I don't see an objection to the move but questions on better names for other impulse related topics. 278: 407:
I don't support it, although I might not have been clear before, so I've modified my previous comment to reflect my opinion.
351:, you and ham pastrami think it should be moved, chhe supports both, and 242 just commented on the move to article naming. 373: 274: 103:
article is devoted to the technical meaning in mechanics. However, for the global WP readership, other meanings such as
453:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
139:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
153: 163: 51: 425: 381: 433: 240: 187: 149: 112: 398: 330: 372:
should have been renamed without a discussion. At the very least, it might have been better named as
270: 104: 412: 356: 294: 249:
Hmmm - do we even have an article on impulses in electromagnetism? If we did, what would it say?
466: 369: 344: 322: 282: 266: 254: 213: 178: 231:
in psychology? This is why no viable primary topic exists and why I consider it appropriate for
458: 318: 236: 183: 108: 235:
to be the dab page. Wikilinks can be corrected as always. This is not a barrier to renaming.
394: 326: 408: 352: 308: 290: 461:
article, and used to point at that article, but now point at the disambiguation page.
478: 462: 250: 209: 444: 325:
are being considered then there is no primary use and the dab page should be here.
130: 304: 348: 286: 232: 174: 167: 100: 38: 20: 457:
This has left several dozen wiki-links that should point at the
470: 437: 416: 402: 385: 360: 334: 312: 298: 258: 244: 217: 191: 157: 116: 303:
It should either be restored to impulse or impulse (physics).
289:. FYI, there is no such thing as electromechanical impulse. 182:
actual objections, I am requesting that this page be moved.
129:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
95:
Proposal to swap the disamb page with "impulse" article
56: 64:, where you can join the project or contribute to the 443:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
343:
the page is moved it should be something other than
54:pages on Knowledge. If you wish to help, you can 44:This disambiguation page is within the scope of 8: 50:, an attempt to structure and organize all 15: 60:attached to this talk page, or visit the 264:Do not move; restore to original naming 17: 7: 144:The result of the move request was: 74:Knowledge:WikiProject Disambiguation 77:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation 14: 281:to be precise. Therefore I think 485:WikiProject Disambiguation pages 37: 19: 177:" article was already moved to 269:garnishes far more links than 1: 374:impulse (classical mechanics) 501: 438:04:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 417:22:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 403:22:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 386:05:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC) 361:15:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC) 335:03:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC) 313:05:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC) 299:23:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 259:23:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 245:20:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 218:19:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 192:18:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 158:17:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 47:WikiProject Disambiguation 471:18:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC) 117:16:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 32: 450:Please do not modify it. 164:Impulse (disambiguation) 136:Please do not modify it. 426:Talk:Mechanical impulse 80:Disambiguation articles 285:should be restored to 204:. (Actually, I like 271:impulse (psychology) 105:impulse (psychology) 370:Mechanical impulse 345:mechanical impulse 323:Mechanical impulse 283:mechanical impulse 267:Mechanical impulse 202:Mechanical impulse 179:Mechanical impulse 459:Impulse (physics) 319:impulse (physics) 225:Impulse (physics) 198:Impulse (physics) 150:Anthony Appleyard 92: 91: 88: 87: 492: 452: 138: 82: 81: 78: 75: 72: 59: 41: 34: 33: 23: 16: 500: 499: 495: 494: 493: 491: 490: 489: 475: 474: 455: 448: 196:I would prefer 134: 124: 97: 79: 76: 73: 70: 69: 55: 12: 11: 5: 498: 496: 488: 487: 477: 476: 445:requested move 441: 440: 419: 405: 388: 376:or something. 368:I don't think 363: 337: 315: 301: 261: 247: 220: 194: 173:The previous " 161: 142: 141: 131:requested move 125: 123: 122:Requested move 120: 96: 93: 90: 89: 86: 85: 83: 71:Disambiguation 52:disambiguation 42: 30: 29: 27:Disambiguation 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 497: 486: 483: 482: 480: 473: 472: 468: 464: 460: 454: 451: 446: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 420: 418: 414: 410: 406: 404: 400: 396: 392: 389: 387: 383: 379: 378:70.29.210.242 375: 371: 367: 364: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 314: 310: 306: 302: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 265: 262: 260: 256: 252: 248: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 221: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 193: 189: 185: 180: 176: 172: 171: 170: 169: 165: 160: 159: 155: 151: 147: 140: 137: 132: 127: 126: 121: 119: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 94: 84: 67: 63: 58: 57:edit the page 53: 49: 48: 43: 40: 36: 35: 31: 28: 25: 22: 18: 456: 449: 442: 430:76.66.194.32 421: 390: 365: 340: 263: 237:Ham Pastrami 228: 224: 205: 201: 197: 184:Ham Pastrami 162: 145: 143: 135: 128: 109:Jorge Stolfi 99:The current 98: 62:project page 45: 395:Vegaswikian 327:Vegaswikian 146:page moved 66:discussion 409:Wizard191 353:Wizard191 291:Wizard191 479:Category 463:Cardamon 317:If both 251:Cardamon 210:Cardamon 422:Comment 391:Support 366:Comment 349:impulse 287:impulse 233:Impulse 229:impulse 206:Impulse 175:Impulse 168:Impulse 101:impulse 467:talk 434:talk 413:talk 399:talk 382:talk 357:talk 331:talk 321:and 309:talk 305:Chhe 295:talk 255:talk 241:talk 214:talk 188:talk 154:talk 113:talk 447:. 424:at 277:vs 275:255 200:to 481:: 469:) 436:) 415:) 401:) 384:) 359:) 341:if 333:) 311:) 297:) 279:60 273:; 257:) 243:) 216:) 190:) 166:→ 156:) 148:. 133:. 115:) 465:( 432:( 411:( 397:( 380:( 355:( 329:( 307:( 293:( 253:( 239:( 212:( 186:( 152:( 111:( 68:.

Index

WikiProject icon
Disambiguation
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Disambiguation
disambiguation
edit the page
project page
discussion
impulse
impulse (psychology)
Jorge Stolfi
talk
16:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
requested move
Anthony Appleyard
talk
17:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Impulse (disambiguation)
Impulse
Impulse
Mechanical impulse
Ham Pastrami
talk
18:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Cardamon
talk
19:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Impulse
Ham Pastrami
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.