1535:
Intuit tested venture capitalists with, "What should Intuit do if
Microsoft entered the personal finance market to compete with Quicken?" When Microsoft did enter it did so badly that its then CEO ended up on Intuit's Board. The 9 or more major Microsoft defeats, without a win, include the recent dropping of Microsoft Money retail sales, so Quicken will go much higher than its prior 83% market share at retail. This - war now includes Intuit, , , , , , , , , / , and others against Microsoft. One key is Intuit Chair Noted industry veteran and venture capitalist said Campbell âis the single best mentor and coach of CEOs, teams, and talentâ (The CTO Forum). The Best Story About Google Yet (Silicon Beat) covers, "The heroic role played by Bill Campbell ... Doerr would say Bill Campbell saved Google ... God bless that man ... I don't know where the company would be without him." The Secret Coach (Fortune Magazine) covers many such Campbell jobs. Campbell came from Apple and he or Doerr are on the Board of many of these companies. It will take a book to describe all that these companies have done to work together against Microsoft.--
1550:
farm. created and licensed it to
Microsoft. In 2004 QuickBooks adopted a Sybase cross-platform database, with excellent Linux benchmarks. It also produced an Apple Mac version with a 4 man team. The Mac can run Linux and uses a variant of Unix (which gave rise to Linux) as its primary operating system. How to Face Off Against Microsoft (Business Week, 2005) says, "Intuit has repelled the software giant six times." It also says Intuit began to fight the ($ 2 billion dollar) Microsoft QuickBooks-killer when QuickBooks had 74% of small business accounting software at retail. It now has 94% and Microsoft is not even #2, so this is a seventh time Intuit beat Microsoft. The Microsoft Money produst dropped retail sales after Quicken has 83% of the home finance market at retail. In 2006 Intuit released a Linux database server that ran 10% - 25% faster, more reliably, in less memory, that its Windows server. In 2008 Intuit created a website for Linux QuickBooks add-ons. It quickly released articles like, "Linux is the future." It is now making QuickBooks browser independent.--
1507:
Inside Intuit book begins, "Intuit is tale of missionaries, not mercenaries. It's about a founding team that prevails through tenacity, frugality and an obsession with the customer experience." Its 9 page Intuit Vision, Mission and
Operating Values, says, "Intuit was founded on strong principles and has always acted on them ... WOW! Many companies say their most important job is satisfying the customer. We don't. We believe that satisfying the customer is simply the minimum requirement for staying in business. Therefore, we don't seek merely to satisfy our customers, we seek to wow them... Integrity Without Compromise. Intuit is built on integrity. In all we do, we maintain the highest standards, never approaching what could be considered questiona--
1779:
paragraph doesn't belong in the intro, because it's not a fundamental part of "what is Intuit?" and, specifically, that second half "in most wealthy countries..." is irrelevant to this article, not to mention pretty misleading if you're familiar with international tax--tax return filings are an opportunity to offer up exemptions and deductions; a system of pre-filled tax return filing in the US would, as with those other countries, minimize your ability to, say, write off your medical or school or business expenses. Anyway, that's not a clean enough or notable enough point to justify being in an Intro section rather than a
Lawsuits & Controversies section. --
1565:
Linux. Bill Gates initially paid Intuit to use
Internet Explorer, but Cook testified against Microsoft in the anti-trust case. Intuit had big problems with Vista and a bad .Net Framework upgrade. This was either bad Microsoft product testing or a modern version of "DOS ain't done 'til Lotus won't run." It seems inevitable that a simple convertible Linux should be on QuickBooks and Quicken install disks, along with Google-Sun Star Office. This will save many users $ 500 on Microsoft Vista and Office. It also will save lots of time and money spent on virus and spyware programs and checking.--
84:
305:
938:
920:
238:
1515:) 10:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)ble behavior... Afterword. What about results - things like market share, growing our revenue, profits ... Don't we care about results. We do. Market share is a measure of how well we are serving customers ... What's more, if we do our jobs right, its a chain reaction, not a series of tradeoffs ... Simply put, living and working by our operating values will create customer wow and shareholder value."
144:
117:
728:
489:
668:
781:
756:
641:
154:
948:
295:
274:
848:
827:
400:
379:
1062:
226:
75:
21:
1008:
410:
1409:) 10:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC) The first POV should be removed at once. It cites no source is easily shown as slanderously wrong. Google has 8,730 links to Quicken + reviews + comments, excluding ones with 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2008 (robo said "recent" in 2007). Only 135 (1.5%) mention class action even once. Robo says, "try to find
2240:
Though independently, on the topic of lobbying, I'm not actually certain I agree with it not being notable. It is mentioned later in the article that Intuit lobbies a large amount relative to its size. I'm definitely open to other improvements. I would also question your reasoning about Rent-Seeking,
2226:
Okay, will do, very sorry about that and thanks for bringing up that issue. I have worked for a short time for the company, in a role entirely unrelated to the image, and this is a purely personal decision with zero to negligible impact on me. I've had a problem with this article for quite a while in
2182:
The intro paragraphs were ported over from the TurboTax article, and are important pieces of context, but they seem to be phrased to push an opinion, rather than relate them to Intuit or other behaviors. Can we get a wording on these which will help readers explain the relation of these pieces to the
2096:
ProLine Tax Online, an Intuit ProLine
Solution, was first released by Intuit in 2009. It is a web-based tax solution for tax professionals, supporting the preparation of Federal and state tax returns for 1040, 1065, 1120 and 1120S and providing multi-user access for tax firms with multiple employees.
1885:
I'd suggest to rewrite the product list rather than moving it. Moving the whole list to a separate article is no improvement if it's still a list of products, but it could be used to improve the article in an encyclopedic way. I believe the best solution would be to put them in the article's context,
1564:
End Runs Around Vista is a good 2008 article, but
Business Week left out critical information and had little comment space. Intuit revolutionized accounting, while its usability tests revolutionized software development. Intuit is the expert in creating drop-dead-simple programs, which it can use for
1225:
There is a very rudimentary criticism section in an article about a company that is the target of a tremendous amount of vitriol (try to find a review of a recent version of
Quicken that doesn't involve the words "class-action" in at least 3 of the comments. What's left is very fluffy and pro-Intuit.
2089:
Lacerte tax software, an Intuit ProLine
Solution, was acquired by Intuit in 1998. It serves a wide range of full time tax professionals who serve a high volume of individual and business client needs, including highly complex tax returns. Lacerte Tax includes federal and state tax modules for 1040,
1476:
Here is one more FACT justifying limiting Intuit critic posts, and ending puff piece and significance notes, is market share. Intuit product market share shows actual votes of all Intuit and comparable software consumers, who tend to vote every one to three years. If you pleased all the people al0l
1435:
I estimate this cost Intuit $ 40 million, but I got on an Intuit
Advisory Council in time to protest again. Instead of dumping me, the CEO wrote, "Keep raising hell when Intuit does something wrong!" He tripled revenue and quadrupled earnings in 8 years, partly due to continuing the constant Intuit
1142:
Criticisms in context are fine. A good example is the mention of the product activation flap described in TurboTax and the subsequent actions of Intuit in response. However, rants for the sake of criticism are as antithetical to neutral reviews as are blatant commercial explotation of the site to
1778:
The second intro paragraph opens with "Intuit has lobbied extensively against the IRS creating its own online system of tax filing (in most wealthy countries, governments have simplified tax filing for its citizens, thus making software such as TurboTax unnecessary for most citizens)." That whole
1549:
The Intuit - Microsoft war may soon enter a decisive stage. Scott Cook, Intuit founder, long ago wrote me that Jefferson, Lincoln and Torvalds (inventor and mentor of ) were three of our greatest minds. Google long almost shared a parking lot with Intuit and Google now has the biggest Linux server
1832:
Notability of the products: The list is too long and notability of each product has to be established. It should not be a list of all products made by the company, but only of those that are notable (all others could be just mentioned on a separate paragraph). If all of them are notable, consider
1724:
I'm culling some of the "Criticism and controversies" section as it flows pretty oddly. Trying to take a look at from an outsider's perspective, if I cracked open an encyclopedia to a page on Intuit, what would I want to learn about them. that "The Microsoft Money converter for Quicken does not
1660:
I'm not surprised. I took the photos of the Googleplex and Intuit headquarters and I noticed that they are very close to each other (the northernmost Google building is across the street from the southernmost Intuit building). It would have been very easy for their execs to bump into each other
1506:
Material in this paragraph and the Inside Intuit book proves that Intuit, as opposed to one of its 8,000 employees, never knowingly mistreats customers. Unless a user can say they properly got a case number and repeatedly asked to have a problem "escalate" they cannot say Intuit did anything. The
1456:
the main Intuit article is no puff piece or insignificant, so disputes on it should no longer appear. This relates to Net Promoter scores. "Net Promoter is a discipline by which companies profitably grow by focusing on their customers... One simple question - Would you recommend us to a friend or
2131:
The EULA for Quickbooks requires all users to permit Intuit to electronically obtain and use their financial data for unstated purposes. This applies to all versions of the product, including the personal and accounting versions. Although the information is supposedly anonymized, Intuit's almost
1870:
Valid, points, all - what are the thoughts on splitting the products list to a seperate article - 'List of Intuit products'? The list o' products has seemed to overwhelm discussion of Intuit the company. This might provide a balance between judging whether each of the products is notable in of
1579:
The remaining missing section relates to a major topic on Knowledge (XXG), usability testing. There is clear evidence that Intuit was the first to really use it, revolutionizing the use of personal computers, the software industry and accounting (all with cited facts, not opinions). It did these
1534:
Puff piece and insignificance thought end with the Inside Intuit book subtitle, "How the Makers of Quicken Beat Microsoft and Revolutionized and Entire Industry." The book shows this is true repeatedly, so it would be hard to write a puff piece overstating favorable Intuit facts or significance.
1117:
On a related note, I've noticed that a user from IP address 67.174.76.243 has repeatedly and removed references to public criticism of Intuit. I believe he is a Lacerte (i.e. Intuit) employee and should explain his actions. Knowledge (XXG) is not a promotional tool for commercial self-interests.
1743:
The company profile and product list seem fairly objective to me, I don't think the goal is to have a promotional article for Intuit. Many of these criticism belong on someone's blog. If they reach such a mindshare that 3rd party source begin to cover them, they will be added to the article,
1519:
I most respectfully submit that this is very important to understanding Intuit relative to its critics, puff pieces and significance. Intuit top executives are far easier to reach, and to convince to make changes, than those in any company I have ever seen. I often see where I or Intuit people
1309:
From Rani.... Reading the text left no doubt in my mind that Intuit employees or salespeople were heavily involved in its content. Completely one-sided representations that fail to touch on many serious problems including the terrible tech support, serious privacy risk, the way they basically
1431:
I only would add this paragraph in a Talk section. You cannot please all the people all the time. We also interpret facts to support opinions and change opinions over time. I am a very independent CPA, but usually pro-Intuit. Despite this, I twice publicly tried to get users to protest Intuit
1273:
Oh, and I didn't mean to suggest it should be a rant section, but what criticism is there does seem very rudimentary--thrown in as if to say "Look we showed the other side." On the other hand, the description of the products, for example, is peppered with words like "advantage", "discount",
1207:
Some the criticism seems exaggerated. The issues with the upgrade policy are mere restatements of a common policy. Many software companies like Intuit are sending older versions into de-support. This may be a criticism of software vendors in general vs. Intuit specifically. The criticism
2186:
In my opinion it's clear that the notoriety of the reports and other information seems to be on their own. That is, people would know about Intuit/TurboTax from reading or hearing about those. It does not appear that these are centered because they are important to the article on their own.
1977:. There seems to be consensus here that some of Intuit's products are notable in of themselves, namely Quicken at the least. Article certainly can use further references, but have strived to make in neutral and avoid some of the debates over whether the article is considered advertising.
2082:
ProSeries tax software, an Intuit ProLine Solution, evolved from TurboTax and grew over the years to become a full-fledged professional preparer product and a leader in the market. It serves full-time tax preparers. There are two versions: ProSeries Professional and ProSeries Basic.
1488:
TurboTax also had around a 70% market share. Therefore, in the way it matters most, this too says that Intuit critics are, as a mater of fact, far less relatively significant than the critics of other companies. People do not simply use Intuit products, but often love or hate
1417:", but 8,595 (98.5%) Quicken reviews, with comments, that did not mention class action. Moreover, no one who reads , to which we agree when installing major programs, should make class action threats. You specifically waive damages if programs do not work or damage data. --
2124:
In 2010, Intuit required all users of earlier versions of Quicken to upgrade to Quicken 2011 or they would lose many of the capabilities that existed in earlier versions, such as the dowloading of stock prices. The resulting upgrade lost many of the capabilities of earlier
1432:
decisions and boycott, while threatening class action suits (once hiring an attorney to sue). Both times Intuit quickly backed off. A well known writer said, "this major victory... was almost certainly caused by... Block... led the battle against the new fees."
1373:
Please sign in when editing so we know who is making the changes, otherwise we can only see an anonymous IP address. And then please remember to sign your comments on the Talk page with ~~~~, which Knowledge (XXG) will automatically convert to you login
88:
1197:
I disagree that the critisicm section should be removed. As Norvy says; removing the criticism section entirely is not appropriate. The section should be kept until a discussion at this talk page results in a decision to remove the section.
2288:
I have edited this post above after-the-fact, to clean-up up some ultimately off-topic confusions about Knowledge (XXG)'s COI definition. I've marked myself as having COI here. This is the same account as the IP above, if it was confusing.
1886:
giving information about the history of the company and their products, the targets they have, how these have changed over time, the success or lack of success of these products, etc. Notable products could have their own article. Look at
1935:
Many of Intuit products are notable, and should have their own article. Quicken for example is one of the most used Finance Tool in the world (besides Money). It is a big shame Knowledge (XXG) only have a poor, brief, description of it.
1180:. I'd assume that it's of higher quality since it attracts more contributors. Microsoft also comes to mind due to its overwhelming market position -- not unlike Intuit in its own market. Please note that this article also contains a
2399:
2018:
I removed the "too long" tag. I don't see any problem. I also don't see any rationale or discussion on the Talk page. The 32K limit hasn't been an issue for year and years, and anyway the article is only about half that length.
1520:
quickly turn critics into friends. One former critic promptly invested his entire retirement fund in Intuit stock. That is why I believe Intuit critics are those who have not yet gotten to the right Intuit person. --
251:
127:
2132:
exclusive monopoly in the market means that such information can be sold to data vendors and easily linked to actual entities. In addition, the IRS has recently begun demanding quickbooks files in taxpayer audits.
1763:. If and when those issues actually receive coverage from major news sources (e.g. Facebook's strange account deletion policy was covered today in the New York Times) then they can be restored to the article. --
2389:
1580:
usability tests long before those credited in the Knowledge (XXG) article, which I will supplement. I must leave now. I hope critics will give me a few hours to finish. The missing part could change minds. --
507:
610:
2128:
In 2011, Intuit required all versions of earlier versions Quickbooks to upgrade to Quickbooks 2011 or they would lose their ability to directly connect to Merchant Services for Credit Card processing.
1836:
Criticism section in list format: It could be appropriate to write this section as a paragraph, explaining what the activation scheme from Macrovision is, and why it's use is considered controversial.
2404:
1245:
Personally, I don't consider what's left to be pro-Intuit. It seems to me to be basically factual and neutral. Perhaps the criticism could be expanded (or, if it's big enough, it's own topic like
2069:
Full disclosre - I work for the Intuit Accounting Professionals Divsion. I have some updated information on products and acquisitions for your consideration for the Intuit Knowledge (XXG) page at:
1167:
I can see where IP 67.172.76.243 is coming from and thought that perhaps rephrasing that section would help. I'm glad that we are at least discussing it now - instead of endlessly reverting it ;-)
2534:
2357:
1236:
Just because people rant online (via comments) about "class-action" doesn't mean anything has proceeded to anything approaching that level, so it's not a real measure of criticism. Apart from a
2156:
902:
2509:
892:
2424:
256:
2514:
868:
2479:
1274:"popular", "free", and other breezy, positive language. Sorry, I didn't mean to focus on the criticism section exclusively. It just feels like they wrote it; doesn't it? --
2529:
2429:
2504:
2419:
36:
855:
832:
2444:
2241:
as this hasn't been a viewpoint that seems directly supported by references, so whether or not you and I believe that is the case, I don't believe it merits enough
351:
2100:
There are several other products that Intuit has released in the last year, but I don't know to what level of specificity you'd like to see in the Intuit article.
2489:
216:
466:
2227:
any case, as I have felt it hasn't maintained a neutral point of view. To me, those paragraphs read like a reddit comment, not Knowledge (XXG), or deliberate
1471:] This is the most important single metric determining future success. Intuit has a Net Promoter score that is more than 35% higher than others in its field.
2384:
718:
2414:
546:
533:
206:
1670:
Actually, those are old Google buildings. The main Googleplex is a few more blocks away. Still in the area, but not as neighbourly as they once were. --
1486:
1457:
colleague? - allows companies to track promoters and detractors and produces a clear measure of an organization's performance through its customers' eyes.
361:
2183:
history of Intuit, or notable features about it, rather than following a timeline. The overview is a sensitive area without much room to give details.
2474:
708:
1477:
the time you would have a 100% market share. In March, 2008 the QuickBooks share, of small business accounting software sales at retail, was 94.2%.
2524:
2459:
2439:
2434:
456:
970:
182:
2464:
2394:
432:
2090:
1065, 1120, 1120S, 990, 1041, 709, 706 and 5500, as well as services for firms with staff requiring multiple locations and multi-user access.
1413:
of a recent version of Quicken that doesn't involve the words "class-action" in at least 3 of the comments" As this shows, I quickly got not "
1208:
regarding Vista compatiblity applies to a large number of vendors as well, and would be better placed in an article on backward compatibility.
684:
540:
2449:
1700:
1291:
True enough, it does have a bit of positive spin there. Not quite sure how to neturalize it though. Might be worth trying to compare it to
2519:
2409:
2242:
2190:
1240:
that "a class action lawsuit can't be far behind" from 2005, and some discussion of a 2000 class action to do with information and privacy.
520:
327:
55:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
2484:
2050:
1358:
961:
925:
167:
122:
2469:
2361:
2312:
1226:
It makes sense if the allegations above are true that an Intuit employee is actively trying to promote the company in the article. --
1089:
737:
651:
423:
384:
2454:
1325:
1760:
1081:
1073:
787:
761:
675:
646:
1310:
blackmail people into buying new products that cost hundreds of dollars but are only minimally different from previous versions.
1710:
1585:
1570:
1555:
1540:
1525:
1512:
1497:
1444:
1422:
1406:
2494:
2379:
1042:
514:
501:
318:
279:
97:
2499:
601:
527:
1736:
Is the 'criticism' or 'controversy' relatively unique to Intuit and not the broader software/financial service industries?
243:
1439:
The new CEO soon wrote, "You're fantastic Mike. Absolutely fantastic!" Other sections here show most are pro-Intuit. --
1018:
1654:
32:
1845:"company wasn't a major success until the advent of Windows 3.0 in early 1990s, when sales of Quicken grew explosively
1706:
1581:
1566:
1551:
1536:
1521:
1508:
1493:
1440:
1418:
1402:
1129:
1759:
I concur with your deletions. Much of that text seemed to be in violation of Knowledge (XXG) policies, particularly
1481:
2213:
1516:
1021:
require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
1437:
1385:
to back up your edit then feel free to re-add the change. Also, the tone of your comment seemed to violate the
2246:
2194:
1871:
itself (and deserves an article), and retaining the details of the products Intuit has produced over the years
1725:
convert Money data files to Quicken 2008"?...pretty obscure. Instead, suggest looking at it through this lens:
1478:
1026:
553:
103:
2348:
with no independent notability. Intuit India should be merged into the "International operations" section of
2054:
1362:
2316:
1606:
Michael Block CPA computation, based on Scott Cook Intuit keynote material, national Intuit Conference, 2004
2046:
1483:
1467:] The Economist said this about the author of a related best selling book, "the "high priest" of loyalty."
1354:
1313:
1151:
policy, by all means, make them. But removing the criticism section entirely is not appropriate here. --
792:
766:
1633:
1249:), but it should not just become just a collection of complaints, as that's not particularly encyclopedic.
1246:
573:
2263:
2209:
1656:
I didn't read too much into the article; just putting it here if anyone wants to add it to the article.
1321:
969:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
867:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
683:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
431:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
326:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
181:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2228:
1739:
Has the 'controversy' (as well as the individual positions) itself been discussed in a reliable source?
1704:
2141:
1999:
1982:
1876:
1768:
1749:
1014:
2208:. (ii) There's nothing notable about the fact that a company simply engages abstractly in lobbying.
2160:
74:
48:
2168:
2108:
1036:
2341:
2231:. I want to find a wording which mentions the important facts but does not try to push an opinion.
2026:
1699:
venture capitalist, helped Google and Intuit. An associate of his said that Doerr would say that
2023:
1703:, Intuit Chair and former Intuit CEO, saved Google while acting as its top management consultant.
1637:
1464:
1237:
1185:
1119:
1114:
Thanks for the suggestion. I believe I have added the information shortly after your request.
1640:
is a better bet, please correct the link. Please don't link back to the disambiguation page!
1199:
1133:
953:
159:
1386:
1382:
1334:
1148:
1022:
566:
1784:
1317:
1143:
post self-serving hype. I have removed this section accordingly. IP address 67.174.76.243
559:
415:
2205:
1829:", etc. Spam and weasel words should be removed (nothing new so far, it was already tagged)
2294:
2273:
2137:
1995:
1978:
1904:
1872:
1857:
1764:
1745:
1696:
1683:
1662:
1209:
1155:
590:
1931:
The POV issue is caused by the advertisement issue. So there is no need of this tag too.
1378:
1341:
section. I removed the one you added to the TurboTax section as it was 4 years old. --
2164:
2104:
1671:
1390:
1342:
1296:
1261:
1032:
488:
1730:
937:
919:
2373:
2353:
2020:
1938:
1692:
1275:
1254:
1227:
1108:
1104:
310:
1389:
policy, so it should be re-written without language like "force-feeds". Thanks. --
727:
2337:
2327:
2311:
Why does this company have their phone nunmber on the name on the first paragraph?
1458:
143:
116:
2039:
There's a Quicken Health Expense Tracker application now too. It's web based:
1780:
1061:
780:
755:
667:
640:
2290:
2269:
1974:
1927:
The article looks like an advertisement. It should be worked to be more NPOV.
1899:
1852:
1629:
1490:
1152:
1147:
If you have some changes that you think would make the section better fit the
966:
947:
943:
864:
405:
300:
294:
273:
233:
177:
172:
149:
1433:
1107:
must be described. Also, the two articles contain contradictory information.
1923:
It cite sources os many things. The "don't cite sources" should be removed.
1891:
1887:
1641:
1468:
1461:
1292:
1181:
1177:
2112:
847:
826:
1992:
680:
2204:(i) If you have an affiliation with Intuit, you need to declare it, per
859:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
225:
1966:
860:
428:
399:
378:
1894:, their products are mentioned, but from the historical perspective.
2400:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
2349:
2345:
2331:
1970:
1691:
The Intuit - Google relationship is not simply a matter of location.
1338:
323:
52:
1381:
policy of Knowledge (XXG). If you can find independent, verifiable
1377:
Your edit, as "personal experience", was removed as it violates the
1485:
before retail sales ended for its main competitor, Microsoft Money.
508:
Knowledge (XXG):Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
1661:
while jogging around the block or visiting local restaurants. --
1176:
For the sake of comparison, I'd suggest reviewing the article on
2157:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:Jakefrdrck/sandbox
2040:
1953:
1465:
http://www.netpromoter.com/np_conference/agenda-highlights.php
1370:
A few comments about your latest edit (which I have removed):
1351:
Thanks, sorry for adding an old link, hadn't noticed. Rani
1056:
1002:
68:
15:
2390:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Society and social sciences
2365:
2320:
2298:
2277:
2250:
2217:
2198:
2172:
2145:
2058:
2003:
1986:
1910:
1880:
1863:
1788:
1772:
1753:
1714:
1686:
1674:
1665:
1644:
1589:
1574:
1559:
1544:
1529:
1501:
1448:
1426:
1393:
1345:
1299:
1278:
1264:
1230:
1212:
1202:
1188:
1158:
1136:
1122:
1088:
here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or
1060:
726:
224:
2136:
Someone please find some good sourcing for these claims.
1463:
Many successsfully used Net Promoter, including Intuit.
1729:
Does each side of the 'criticism' or 'controversy' have
1253:"Of course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong." -
171:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1085:
60:
56:
27:
2070:
2405:
C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
1025:. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
1833:
moving the most important ones to separate articles.
965:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
877:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Finance & Investment
679:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
427:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
322:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2535:
Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
2065:
Updates to Intuit Page - For Editors' Consideration
2013:
1744:perhaps even in the lead area about the company.
1460:One question can determine your business' future.
2510:Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
2103:Thank you for considering these proposed edits,
790:, a project which is currently considered to be
1799:The article is written like an advertisement: "
2425:Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
1132:. I have now readded the critisism section. --
2515:WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
880:Template:WikiProject Finance & Investment
8:
2480:C-Class software articles of Low-importance
2014:I don't see any problem with article length
1847:", etc need reliable, third-party sources.
1720:Culling criticism and controversies section
547:Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
534:Category:Company articles needing attention
2530:Paid contributions with no listed employer
2430:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
914:
821:
750:
635:
496:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
474:
373:
268:
111:
2505:C-Class Finance & Investment articles
1469:http://www.netpromoter.com/book/index.php
2178:Intro paragraphs and objective notoriety
1816:customer support in its early years was
2420:C-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
1599:
1070:Individuals with a conflict of interest
916:
823:
752:
637:
375:
270:
113:
72:
2445:Low-importance Canada-related articles
2385:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
2358:2405:201:D002:319D:65FA:8E2F:C14C:22B8
1086:request corrections or suggest content
1080:not to directly edit the article. See
979:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Technology
191:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California
2490:Unknown-importance Computing articles
2268:Replying so you actually get pinged.
1701:William Campbell (business executive)
572:Help expand stub articles located at
441:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Companies
7:
2163:, who is mentioned on this page. --
1761:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
1615:Inside Intuit book, Forward, page x
1480:Quicken had an a 80%+ market share,
1295:to see how to word things better. --
1082:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest
959:This article is within the scope of
856:WikiProject Finance & Investment
853:This article is within the scope of
802:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Taxation
786:This article is within the scope of
693:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Software
673:This article is within the scope of
521:Category:Unassessed company articles
421:This article is within the scope of
316:This article is within the scope of
165:This article is within the scope of
1841:It has significant R&D activity
102:It is of interest to the following
2415:Low-importance California articles
2356:was also merged a few years ago).
336:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Canada
14:
883:Finance & Investment articles
252:San Francisco Bay Area task force
2475:Low-importance software articles
1076:the subject of the article, are
1006:
946:
936:
918:
846:
825:
779:
754:
666:
639:
598:Tag company talk pages with the
487:
408:
398:
377:
303:
293:
272:
236:
152:
142:
115:
82:
73:
19:
2525:WikiProject Technology articles
2460:Mid-importance company articles
2440:C-Class Canada-related articles
2435:WikiProject California articles
982:Template:WikiProject Technology
897:This article has been rated as
713:This article has been rated as
461:This article has been rated as
356:This article has been rated as
211:This article has been rated as
194:Template:WikiProject California
2465:WikiProject Companies articles
2395:C-Class level-5 vital articles
2366:07:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
2071:http://en.wikipedia.org/Intuit
2035:Quicken Health Expense Tracker
1973:and inspired by the format of
1789:17:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
1715:03:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
1687:22:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1682:Oops, forgot to sign my name.
1675:22:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1666:02:54, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1590:17:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1575:17:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1560:10:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1545:10:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1530:10:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1502:10:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1449:10:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1427:10:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1365:) 19:09, August 30, 2007 (UTC)
1328:) 01:09, August 30, 2007 (UTC)
1213:04:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
587:Tag company articles with the
444:Template:WikiProject Companies
1:
2027:16:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
1839:Citations: Statements like: "
1773:08:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1754:06:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
1099:Intuit Canada & Criticism
973:and see a list of open tasks.
871:and see a list of open tasks.
805:Template:WikiProject Taxation
735:This article is supported by
696:Template:WikiProject Software
687:and see a list of open tasks.
435:and see a list of open tasks.
330:and see a list of open tasks.
249:This article is supported by
244:San Francisco Bay Area portal
185:and see a list of open tasks.
2450:All WikiProject Canada pages
2321:16:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
2173:02:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
2113:00:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
2076:Under the Products section:
2064:
2041:http://healthcare.intuit.com
1969:, culling some content from
478:WikiProject Companies To-do:
2520:C-Class Technology articles
2410:C-Class California articles
1394:01:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
1346:06:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
1300:23:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
1279:08:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
1265:06:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
1231:09:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1203:07:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
1189:05:38, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
1159:05:04, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
1137:09:15, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
339:Template:WikiProject Canada
2551:
2485:C-Class Computing articles
1650:Featuring Google Products?
903:project's importance scale
719:project's importance scale
467:project's importance scale
362:project's importance scale
217:project's importance scale
2470:C-Class software articles
2146:23:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
2059:17:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
2004:19:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
1987:20:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
1111:02:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
931:
896:
841:
774:
734:
712:
661:
473:
460:
393:
355:
288:
232:
210:
137:
110:
59:; for its talk page, see
2455:C-Class company articles
2299:04:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
2278:04:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
2251:03:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
2218:00:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
2199:00:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
1911:15:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1881:04:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1864:16:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1826:a vast array of features
1645:17:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
1123:07:43, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
874:Finance & Investment
833:Finance & Investment
1092:if the issue is urgent.
342:Canada-related articles
2495:All Computing articles
2380:C-Class vital articles
2340:is essentially just a
2151:MfD on a related draft
1801:sales of Quicken grew
1707:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1634:independent_contractor
1582:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1567:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1552:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1537:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1522:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1509:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1494:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1441:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1436:pro-customer approach.
1419:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1403:MikeBlockQuickBooksCPA
1247:Criticism of Microsoft
1065:
962:WikiProject Technology
731:
574:Category:Company stubs
229:
168:WikiProject California
128:San Francisco Bay Area
2500:All Software articles
1952:05:50, 10 June 2008 (
1636:. If you think that
1387:neutral point of view
1128:The same applies for
1072:, particularly those
1064:
738:WikiProject Computing
730:
611:requests for comments
602:WikiProject Companies
424:WikiProject Companies
228:
96:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
89:level-5 vital article
1628:I moved the link to
1379:no original research
1238:"gripe line" comment
1015:Wikimedia Foundation
788:WikiProject Taxation
676:WikiProject Software
47:. Its contents were
43:with a consensus to
1733:, reliable sources?
1045:) has been paid by
985:Technology articles
197:California articles
2326:Proposed merge of
2094:ProLine Tax Online
1638:general_contractor
1632:disambiguation to
1066:
732:
319:WikiProject Canada
230:
98:content assessment
31:was nominated for
2159:, for a draft on
2119:Removed criticism
2049:comment added by
1945:
1366:
1357:comment added by
1333:Feel free to add
1329:
1316:comment added by
1096:
1095:
1055:
1054:
1001:
1000:
997:
996:
993:
992:
954:Technology portal
913:
912:
909:
908:
820:
819:
816:
815:
808:Taxation articles
749:
748:
745:
744:
699:software articles
634:
633:
630:
629:
626:
625:
622:
621:
372:
371:
368:
367:
267:
266:
263:
262:
160:California portal
67:
66:
2542:
2267:
2264:Snooganssnoogans
2210:Snooganssnoogans
2061:
1949:
1944:
1941:
1907:
1902:
1898:
1860:
1855:
1851:
1616:
1613:
1607:
1604:
1473:
1472:
1352:
1311:
1221:POV: Puff Piece?
1103:Its relation to
1078:strongly advised
1057:
1010:
1009:
1003:
987:
986:
983:
980:
977:
956:
951:
950:
940:
933:
932:
922:
915:
885:
884:
881:
878:
875:
850:
843:
842:
837:
829:
822:
810:
809:
806:
803:
800:
783:
776:
775:
770:
758:
751:
701:
700:
697:
694:
691:
670:
663:
662:
657:
654:
643:
636:
605:
594:
560:Portal:Companies
502:Article requests
491:
484:
483:
475:
449:
448:
447:company articles
445:
442:
439:
418:
416:Companies portal
413:
412:
411:
402:
395:
394:
389:
381:
374:
344:
343:
340:
337:
334:
313:
308:
307:
306:
297:
290:
289:
284:
276:
269:
246:
241:
240:
239:
199:
198:
195:
192:
189:
162:
157:
156:
155:
146:
139:
138:
133:
130:
119:
112:
95:
86:
85:
78:
77:
69:
23:
22:
16:
2550:
2549:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2541:
2540:
2539:
2370:
2369:
2335:
2309:
2261:
2180:
2153:
2121:
2067:
2044:
2037:
2016:
1957:
1947:
1939:
1905:
1900:
1896:
1858:
1853:
1849:
1808:Quicken became
1796:
1722:
1697:Kleiner Perkins
1652:
1626:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1614:
1610:
1605:
1601:
1223:
1101:
1007:
984:
981:
978:
975:
974:
952:
945:
882:
879:
876:
873:
872:
835:
807:
804:
801:
798:
797:
764:
698:
695:
692:
689:
688:
655:
649:
618:
615:
599:
588:
446:
443:
440:
437:
436:
414:
409:
407:
387:
341:
338:
335:
332:
331:
309:
304:
302:
282:
242:
237:
235:
196:
193:
190:
187:
186:
158:
153:
151:
131:
125:
93:
83:
41:20 October 2019
20:
12:
11:
5:
2548:
2546:
2538:
2537:
2532:
2527:
2522:
2517:
2512:
2507:
2502:
2497:
2492:
2487:
2482:
2477:
2472:
2467:
2462:
2457:
2452:
2447:
2442:
2437:
2432:
2427:
2422:
2417:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2382:
2372:
2371:
2334:
2324:
2308:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2243:162.230.224.99
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2221:
2220:
2191:162.230.224.99
2179:
2176:
2161:Chad Frederick
2152:
2149:
2134:
2133:
2129:
2126:
2120:
2117:
2066:
2063:
2036:
2033:
2031:
2015:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
1960:
1959:
1951:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1867:
1866:
1837:
1834:
1830:
1795:
1794:Article issues
1792:
1776:
1775:
1741:
1740:
1737:
1734:
1721:
1718:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1651:
1648:
1625:
1622:
1618:
1617:
1608:
1598:
1597:
1593:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1375:
1349:
1348:
1337:issues to the
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1268:
1267:
1258:
1250:
1242:
1241:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1162:
1161:
1140:
1139:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1067:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1027:WP:COIRESPONSE
1011:
999:
998:
995:
994:
991:
990:
988:
971:the discussion
958:
957:
941:
929:
928:
923:
911:
910:
907:
906:
899:Low-importance
895:
889:
888:
886:
869:the discussion
851:
839:
838:
836:Lowâimportance
830:
818:
817:
814:
813:
811:
784:
772:
771:
759:
747:
746:
743:
742:
733:
723:
722:
715:Low-importance
711:
705:
704:
702:
685:the discussion
671:
659:
658:
656:Lowâimportance
644:
632:
631:
628:
627:
624:
623:
620:
619:
617:
616:
614:
613:
607:
606:project banner
596:
584:
576:
562:
549:
536:
523:
510:
495:
493:
492:
480:
479:
471:
470:
463:Mid-importance
459:
453:
452:
450:
433:the discussion
420:
419:
403:
391:
390:
388:Midâimportance
382:
370:
369:
366:
365:
358:Low-importance
354:
348:
347:
345:
328:the discussion
315:
314:
298:
286:
285:
283:Lowâimportance
277:
265:
264:
261:
260:
257:Low-importance
248:
247:
231:
221:
220:
213:Low-importance
209:
203:
202:
200:
183:the discussion
164:
163:
147:
135:
134:
132:Lowâimportance
120:
108:
107:
101:
79:
65:
64:
39:was closed on
37:The discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2547:
2536:
2533:
2531:
2528:
2526:
2523:
2521:
2518:
2516:
2513:
2511:
2508:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2498:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2486:
2483:
2481:
2478:
2476:
2473:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2463:
2461:
2458:
2456:
2453:
2451:
2448:
2446:
2443:
2441:
2438:
2436:
2433:
2431:
2428:
2426:
2423:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2413:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2378:
2377:
2375:
2368:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2354:Intuit Canada
2351:
2347:
2343:
2339:
2333:
2329:
2325:
2323:
2322:
2318:
2314:
2307:Phone number?
2306:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2265:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2230:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2177:
2175:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2150:
2148:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2130:
2127:
2123:
2122:
2118:
2116:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2101:
2098:
2095:
2091:
2088:
2084:
2081:
2077:
2074:
2072:
2062:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2051:72.179.49.160
2048:
2042:
2034:
2032:
2029:
2028:
2025:
2022:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1994:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1965:I've created
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1955:
1950:
1943:
1942:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1919:My opinions:
1918:
1917:
1912:
1909:
1908:
1903:
1893:
1889:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1869:
1868:
1865:
1862:
1861:
1856:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1835:
1831:
1828:
1827:
1821:
1819:
1813:
1812:in its market
1811:
1810:a best-seller
1805:
1804:
1798:
1797:
1793:
1791:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1738:
1735:
1732:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1719:
1717:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1705:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1693:L. John Doerr
1689:
1688:
1685:
1676:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1664:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1655:
1649:
1647:
1646:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1623:
1612:
1609:
1603:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1562:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1547:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1532:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1504:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1479:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1429:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1395:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1360:
1359:208.127.98.58
1356:
1347:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1301:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1280:
1277:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1266:
1263:
1259:
1257:
1256:
1255:Dennis Miller
1251:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1229:
1220:
1214:
1211:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1196:
1195:
1190:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1138:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1106:
1105:Intuit Canada
1098:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1068:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1048:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1005:
1004:
989:
972:
968:
964:
963:
955:
949:
944:
942:
939:
935:
934:
930:
927:
924:
921:
917:
904:
900:
894:
891:
890:
887:
870:
866:
862:
858:
857:
852:
849:
845:
844:
840:
834:
831:
828:
824:
812:
795:
794:
789:
785:
782:
778:
777:
773:
768:
763:
760:
757:
753:
740:
739:
729:
725:
724:
720:
716:
710:
707:
706:
703:
686:
682:
678:
677:
672:
669:
665:
664:
660:
653:
648:
645:
642:
638:
612:
608:
603:
597:
592:
586:
585:
583:
581:
577:
575:
571:
569:
568:
563:
561:
558:
556:
555:
550:
548:
545:
543:
542:
537:
535:
532:
530:
529:
524:
522:
519:
517:
516:
511:
509:
506:
504:
503:
498:
497:
494:
490:
486:
485:
482:
481:
477:
476:
472:
468:
464:
458:
455:
454:
451:
434:
430:
426:
425:
417:
406:
404:
401:
397:
396:
392:
386:
383:
380:
376:
363:
359:
353:
350:
349:
346:
329:
325:
321:
320:
312:
311:Canada portal
301:
299:
296:
292:
291:
287:
281:
278:
275:
271:
258:
255:(assessed as
254:
253:
245:
234:
227:
223:
222:
218:
214:
208:
205:
204:
201:
184:
180:
179:
174:
170:
169:
161:
150:
148:
145:
141:
140:
136:
129:
124:
121:
118:
114:
109:
105:
99:
91:
90:
80:
76:
71:
70:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
29:
28:Intuit Canada
25:
18:
17:
2338:Intuit India
2336:
2328:Intuit India
2313:186.18.3.150
2310:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2154:
2135:
2102:
2099:
2093:
2092:
2086:
2085:
2079:
2078:
2075:
2068:
2038:
2030:
2017:
1946:
1937:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1895:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1825:
1823:
1817:
1815:
1809:
1807:
1802:
1800:
1777:
1742:
1723:
1695:, the noted
1690:
1681:
1653:
1627:
1611:
1602:
1594:
1578:
1563:
1548:
1533:
1505:
1475:
1453:
1452:
1430:
1414:
1410:
1400:
1350:
1308:
1252:
1224:
1141:
1134:Sleepyhead81
1116:
1113:
1102:
1077:
1074:representing
1069:
1046:
1039:
1019:Terms of Use
960:
898:
854:
791:
736:
714:
674:
593:|Companies}}
579:
578:
565:
564:
552:
551:
539:
538:
526:
525:
513:
512:
500:
499:
462:
422:
357:
317:
250:
212:
176:
166:
104:WikiProjects
87:
44:
40:
26:
2229:WP:Advocacy
2045:âPreceding
1803:explosively
1353:âPreceding
1318:Rani Lueder
1312:âPreceding
57:its history
2374:Categories
2138:hbdragon88
1996:Cander0000
1979:Cander0000
1975:QuickBooks
1873:Cander0000
1765:Coolcaesar
1746:Cander0000
1731:Verifiable
1684:That Jason
1663:Coolcaesar
1630:contractor
1595:References
1454:FACTS SHOW
1335:documented
1210:Cander0000
1200:Sleepyhead
1090:contact us
1084:. You may
976:Technology
967:technology
926:Technology
865:Investment
188:California
178:California
173:U.S. state
123:California
2342:WP:BRANCH
2165:SmokeyJoe
2125:versions.
2105:RWalkerSF
2080:ProSeries
1892:Microsoft
1888:Apple Inc
1818:legendary
1672:Bdoserror
1391:Bdoserror
1383:citations
1343:Bdoserror
1339:Criticism
1297:Bdoserror
1293:Microsoft
1262:Bdoserror
1184:section.
1182:criticism
1178:Microsoft
1033:NPdigital
652:Computing
438:Companies
429:companies
385:Companies
92:is rated
2115:Rich W.
2047:unsigned
2021:Dpbsmith
1993:TurboTax
1940:SSPecter
1517:page 291
1415:a review
1411:a review
1355:unsigned
1326:contribs
1314:unsigned
1276:Robb0995
1228:Robb0995
1109:Mikkalai
1043:contribs
799:Taxation
793:inactive
767:inactive
762:Taxation
690:Software
681:software
647:Software
595:template
554:Maintain
528:Copyedit
33:deletion
2352:(where
2087:Lacerte
1967:Quicken
1624:Zipingo
1401:From --
1149:WP:NPOV
1047:unknown
1023:WP:PAID
901:on the
861:Finance
717:on the
609:Answer
541:Infobox
465:on the
360:on the
215:on the
94:C-class
2350:Intuit
2346:Intuit
2332:Intuit
2206:WP:COI
2024:(talk)
1991:ditto
1971:Intuit
1781:Mrcolj
1186:Jbetak
1156:(talk)
1120:Jbetak
591:portal
515:Assess
333:Canada
324:Canada
280:Canada
100:scale.
53:Intuit
49:merged
2330:into
2291:Yafwa
2270:Yafwa
1901:Iunaw
1854:Iunaw
1824:with
1489:them.
1153:Norvy
1130:Qwiki
580:Other
567:Stubs
81:This
51:into
45:merge
2362:talk
2317:talk
2295:talk
2274:talk
2247:talk
2214:talk
2195:talk
2169:talk
2155:See
2142:talk
2109:talk
2055:talk
2000:talk
1983:talk
1877:talk
1822:", "
1814:", "
1806:", "
1785:talk
1769:talk
1750:talk
1711:talk
1642:LeeG
1586:talk
1571:talk
1556:talk
1541:talk
1526:talk
1513:talk
1498:talk
1445:talk
1423:talk
1407:talk
1363:talk
1322:talk
1037:talk
1013:The
863:and
61:here
2344:of
2043:.
1954:UTC
1933:(4)
1929:(3)
1925:(2)
1921:(1)
1897:îîî
1890:or
1850:îîî
1843:",
1374:ID.
1029:.
1017:'s
893:Low
709:Low
457:Mid
352:Low
207:Low
175:of
35:.
2376::
2364:)
2319:)
2297:)
2276:)
2249:)
2216:)
2197:)
2171:)
2144:)
2111:)
2073:.
2057:)
2002:)
1985:)
1879:)
1787:)
1771:)
1752:)
1713:)
1588:)
1573:)
1558:)
1543:)
1528:)
1500:)
1492:--
1447:)
1425:)
1324:â˘
1260:--
1198:--
650::
604:}}
600:{{
589:{{
259:).
126::
2360:(
2315:(
2293:(
2272:(
2266::
2262:@
2245:(
2212:(
2193:(
2167:(
2140:(
2107:(
2053:(
1998:(
1981:(
1958:.
1956:)
1948:â
1906:î
1875:(
1859:î
1820:.
1783:(
1767:(
1748:(
1709:(
1584:(
1569:(
1554:(
1539:(
1524:(
1511:(
1496:(
1443:(
1421:(
1405:(
1361:(
1320:(
1049:.
1040:¡
1035:(
905:.
796:.
769:)
765:(
741:.
721:.
582::
570::
557::
544::
531::
518::
505::
469:.
364:.
219:.
106::
63:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.