Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Industrial Workers of the World/Archive 1

Source đź“ť

2223:'A struggle is going on in the nations of the civilized world between the oppressors and the oppressed of all countries, a struggle between capital and labor, which must grow in intensity from year to year and work disastrous results to the toiling millions of all nations if not combined for mutual protection and benefit. This history of the wage-workers of all countries is but the history of constant struggle and misery engendered by ignorance and disunion; whereas the history of the non-producers of all ages proves that a minority, thoroughly organized, may work wonders for good or evil. Conforming to the old adage, 'In union there is strength,' the formation of a Federation embracing every trade and labor organization in North America, a union founded upon a basis as broad as the land we live in, is our only hope.' 1514:
what I think was done methodologically for that GOB reference earlier, is probably not the best measurement. It also contradicts the members stated on the union's LM-3 form for the 2005 fiscal year. Also, that 908 figure is lower that it should be because General Headquarters moved in January, and it slowed down dues processing during that same period, while records were transferred from Philadelphia to Cinci. Also, I do not believe the membership reports were recorded from the ROCs in the UK and Australia, which only report quarterly. Add another few hundred right there. I would go with the LM-3 figures, and just note that membership is difficult to definitively ascertain because the IWW doesn't do dues check-off. A more accurate method would be to count members in any 3-6 month period.
1181:
description. Anarcho-syndicalism is what I was taught when I entered the organization in 1995, and it is what almost every member I encountered proclaimed themselves to me to be during my entire tenure with the IWW. The symbology of the IWW is most often unmistakably anarchistic: the Black Cat of Sabotage (the 'Sabocat', an enduring IWW symbol) as well as the persistent red and black star of anarchosyndicalism are mainstays of Wobbly art and visual identification. Occasionally one will meet individuals in the IWW who may identify themselves as 'Trots', or socialists; this is true. The Wobbly who recruited me into the organization referred to himself as a 'council communist', but always immediately went on to explain that this philosophy is essentially identical to anarcho-syndicalism.
1705:
IWW, the Salvation Army and the Spokane political establishment gives a slightly different picture: "In 1908, in response to growing protests by the Wobblies against employment agencies, Spokane passed an ordinance forbidding street meetings in business districts. The Salvation Army complained that once again it was being forced off the streets, the avenue central to its work. The city then amended the ordinance in the summer of 1909 to allow the Salvation Army to preach and hold street meetings. The Wobblies howled in protest and started a band of their own. They took the lyrics of a few of the Salvation Army's most popular songs and changed them to fit their own perspective."
2927:(sub-minimum) to, currently, eighteen dollars per month. (There are current proposals to increase the higher rates, but the overall structure is not likely to change). The minimum rate is extended not only to working people with jobs, but also to those who have been laid off, those who are unable to find jobs, and those who are still in school (workers in training). For the three dollars a month membership fee, a member receives monthly issues of the union newspaper, copies of the General Organizing Bulletin, ballots, and special notices, not to mention all rights of membership. The cost of postage and printing alone are probably not fully covered by three dollars per month. 3885:. So why does the membership here reflect the list of members who are currently caught up with their dues? I can give at least two objections I have to this. First, it falsely implies that the relationship of the IWW to its membership is similar to that of the trade unions, based on money and economics, and that simply isn't the case. And second, it's really no one's business but that of the Wobs themselves how many of our members are currently paying dues; that's private information and I don't think it should be publically displayed on Knowledge (XXG). The number should reflect the ACTUAL membership numbers of the IWW, regardless of dues status. 3533:-- At times in the past, it has been necessary to split out information from the IWW article because the organization has been around for more than a century, has been involved in a lot of world history, and there is way too much information for one Knowledge (XXG) article. The proposal to add more to an already comprehensive article would simply aggravate that situation. Meanwhile, i agree with what has been stated above. The slogan appears to have originated with the IWW, but it is true that many organizations have either adopted it as their own, or have made use of it in their literature and signage. 2121:
identify how many of those 2000 are current or behind in their membership dues. If they were ALL behind in their membership dues they are still members and I don't think the avergage reader is going to be interested in how many pay their dues on time versus those members that are tardy in paying up. This is like saying Visa has 2000 card holders, but only 900 pay make their payments on time. Does anyone have an objection to removing the "members in good standing" bit? Again, I do not see the relevance and it appears to me to be a source of confusion.
2144:
signed such a contract. However, in general, mainstream unions routinely sign no-strike clauses, and IWW branches almost never do. What does this mean in practice? That the IWW "resists the standard business union practice of selling labor peace to the bosses." All IWW members try their level best to maintain the freedom to walk off the job in support of fellow workers who may depend upon such an action. In short, the IWW is as much an attitude about the relationship between labor and capital, as it is a union.
3905:
microscopically tiny number of contemporary sentimental cranks. Nobody in the early 21st century outside of a tiny, tiny number of active members of the current-day version of the IWW actually believes that the contemporary version of the IWW is even remotely the same social phenomena as the early 20th century IWW. As it stands now, you might as well categorize this version of the history of the IWW alongside entries from true believers in Bigfoot, Flying Saucers and the Loch Ness monster.
2939:
who join at subminimum dues because they cannot afford to pay more. In short, the IWW doesn't want anyone to be unable to join because they cannot afford dues, and if a union that focuses upon the exploitation of real workers can utilize the habits of folks in the existing society (valuing and having discretionary income to spend upon unnecessary hats, buttons, yo-yos, t-shirts, whatever) can be put to use to subsidize such memberships, then what could make more sense?
3708:, but this is largely a result of lack of interested people to make entries rather than a dearth of material. Many past shops of the IWW have been notable in their own right apart from the larger organization and deserve an entry. Plus, with organizing activity set to explode dramatically in every direction (This IS why dues were substantially increased, right? Right?) there will no doubt be piles more notable Wobbly shops in the offing. -- 31: 2315:
have difficulty paying their dues on time. Many IWW members are frequently in arrears, paying dues when they can, but never able to get completely caught up. The union tends to be very understanding about such circumstances. That doesn't mean these members are any less dedicated. I think i could call any number of IWW members and tell them about a job action where workers need support, and they'd all be there in a minute, paid up dues or no.
2907:
that feat hasn't been accomplished yet, and that a semi-large organization is expensive to run, therefore they are still forced to work within the current system, but that sure is a nice little profit. The reason I bring this up, is if it caught my attention I would think that it has been addressed before, and was wondering if anyone had any verifiable info of previous criticisms. I haven't found any yet. Or maybe I just don't get it.
2018:"Syndicalists and radical unionists, such as James Connolly in the UK and Ireland have remained close to the IWW in the USA. Although much smaller than their North American counterparts, the BIROC (British Isles Regional Organising Committee) reported in 2006 that there were nearly 200 members in the UK and Ireland. Numbers have been steadily increasing since the 1990s, and in the year 2005-2006 numbers leapt up by around 25%." 3637:
Instead of money and ownership controlling everything, i believe Wobblies would generally agree that enterprises should be locally controlled in democratic fashion by the workers themselves, and that the workers should be free to decide how much to invest in their cooperative enterprise, how much to pay themselves, and what rules (other than payment of wages) would govern inclusion and participation by other workers.
538:
organizational skills learned from those radical groups. In any case, I suggest you add in a sentence to the intro so we can move towards taking the NPOV tag off. It'd be more productive to agree to disagree and collaborate on a neutral final product than ideological sparring. In the meantime, what was that Malcolm X said, something about if it weren't for us radicals, you moderates would get nowhere.
1920:
but obviously relied on Leier for its source and agrees with his conclusion. Personally, this article is very American-centric, so I think the Vancouver reference adds some balance, especially since the wobs were extremely active in the Pacific North West. Plus I live in Vancouver, and this is my way of resisting American Imperialism (but don't tell that to the NPOV wiki-police).
3459:
think this should be a redirect to that section and the contents merged, and then we'd have something more interesting than either of them. If not, the content should be removed from the IWW article and added here, and the IWW article should link to this one, and then this would be more than a stub. By the way, neither version has mentioned that Bill Haywood said that
634:
really inarguable, but barring specific citation it could be taken as a POV. In addition, their tactics were not 100% non-violent even though their acts of violence were almost always in response to violent actions taken against them. Beyond that this section matches well with every book of IWW history that I've ever read. Perhaps simply changing the first line to
484:. Around 2,000 vigilantes (Bisbee Loyalty League; Businessmen's Protective League) herded 1,386 strikers onto 23 railroad boxcars, shipped them to the Mexican border to die (but they lived). Only 426 strikers were IWW, but the largest percentage of any IWW nationality was Mexican. According to Felix Frankfurter (who 'mediated') half of the workers were foreign-born. 1248:...while the I. W. W. has no logical place in a purely syndicalist and anarcho-syndicalist International, the entrance of a larger number of industrial unions into it would alter its character of "purity", and would transform it into something like the I. W. W., where anarchists, socialists and other ists can work together in harmony, for a common program. 2966:
respect for the organization tenfold and I will be joining this week. Admittedly, I should have done a bit more research. Or used a bit more common sense. It probably wouldn't hurt for the site to have a version of what you said on the store section nonetheless. I'm not the only one who can be judgemental and paranoid, but essentially mean well. Thanks!
123:
reductionist, but I don't see what the author is getting at in saying this about Landrum-Griffin. Is it the trusteeship provisions? If so, he's barking up the wrong tree, since Landrum-Griffin did not introduce trusteeships, but only put some limits on them. This is the sort of language that should be edited out or clarified. Italo Svevo
367:
can) and delete the Mexican-American role section. Although it's a very significant part of American history, there have been many, many, many causes supported in the American Southwest and elsewhere by the IWW, and not all of them deserve to feature prominently in the discussion page here--otherwise it would be thousands of pages long!
153:
example) Trotskyists and others who would be most offended to be described as anarcho-syndicalists. However there are people calling themselves anrcho-syndicalists in the IWW who regard their IWW activities as thier syndicalist practice. I'm a current member of the IWW and an ex-member of the one-time Australian section of the IWA.
263:
to a Chinese being unable to pronounce W which is nonsense, Cantonese lacks the R sound, but W is no problem for any Chinese I have met. If the Chinese was learning to read and had not yet mastered the names for all the letters, he might well have seen W as the wobbly letter. "Are you eye wobbly wobbly" Is then IWW.
477:
the Marines. When .. Wilson ordered a US invasion of Mexico in 1914, he was supported by .. Gompers. 'Big Bill' Haywood responded for the IWW, announcing at a Carnegie Hall meeting .. that if Congress declared war on Mexico, the IWW would 'automatically start the greatest general strike this country has ever known.'
3760:-The latter sentence here reads like an effect of the cause of the former ie. the novel caused the wave of incitement (unverifiable and opinion, POV) More importantly, characterization in a novel does not amount to repression. If the implication is that the novel led to actual repression, that may be unjustifiable. 1030:
G.?) who married a Welshman so she could have a British passport, (Ken John's PhD thesis Greenwich University). Sam's IWW nephew of the same name considered Syndicalism was when the Workers took over and ran the factories, and anarcho indicated a leaning rather than a tight dogmatic Marxist type authority.
2285:
is called dues checkoff. The checkoff means that the company automatically collects dues from union members by deducting it from their paychecks, and then hands the dues money over to the unoin. IWW members are so strongly opposed to dues checkoff, that it is actually prohibited in the IWW constitution.
3636:
If the wage system was abolished, it would have to be replaced with something else. While i don't think there is any consensus within the IWW on issues such as competition, "free enterprise", or the existence of corporate type entities, Wobblies view the leverage of existing capitalism as a negative.
2965:
I had no idea that the membership was so low for those who couldn't pay (and those that can for that matter)... I have been looking to join the IWW, I believe very much in their values and goals, and the online shop was the one question left. You have not only answered that question, but increased my
2938:
The IWW hats are generally very high quality, i've owned several. But the hat is not in any way essential to membership; it is like a trinket, and happens to be in some demand because of the IWW's colorful history. The sales of such unnecessary accoutrements helps to subsidize real, low-paid workers,
2880:
is approaching the need for its own article, with just a summary on this page. Most of the content would focus on 1907-1920. There is some evidence there was a resurgence in IWW activity in the early 1930s. Yes, Ian Turner (historian) is notable enough to have their own wikipedia page. Another highly
2294:
What system does the IWW employ in place of dues checkoff? It is called the job delegate system, and it was developed in 1915-1917 by the AWO, or the Agricultural Worker's Organization of the IWW. It involves an individual IWW member going around to visit each other IWW member, and asking them to pay
2254:
This has been a devil's bargain. Unions that sign such contracts with the corporations are put into the position of becoming enforcers for the company. If workers find their wages, hours and conditions so unsatisfactory that they're willing to risk a walkout during the life of the contract, it is the
2153:
What difference does that make? When i was at IBEW, we worked in the same building with CWA, and the CWA contract expired first. IBEW members were forced to cross CWA picket lines, and do some of the work that the strikers had stopped doing. That is generally referred to as union scabbing, and such a
1565:
Just curious why it is even important that the members are or are not in good standing within the organization? Most organizations mentioned in Knowledge (XXG) are not required to list the number of members who have not paid their dues current to the present moment. It seems absurd and trivial. It
1513:
I wouldn't put it that way at all. 60 days after dues are due for a month, if one has not paid, one has no right to vote in union elections per the Constitution. But yes, there are many members who pay a few months at a time, sometimes ahead, and sometimes behind. So looking at one month, which is
1161:
Need we remember that every one of those Socialist founders had quit the organization within three years? Or that Haywood was thrown out of the SP for his "promotion of sabotage," which is shorthand for "membership in the IWW," and his cooperation with Lenin in the USSR is suspect at best. The IWW
1068:
BTW, I'm not saying you're wrong because I don't claim to know much about the IWW, I just want to see a source before you take out info that has been in for a while. I know that there is at least some relation between the IWW and anarcho-syndicalism, so please give a source to back this up. Thanks. I
815:
The following sentences, located in the Organizing section, are not sourced: "The IWW lumber strike of 1917 led to the eight-hour day and vastly improved working conditions in the Pacific Northwest. Even though mid-century historians would give credit to the US Government and "forward thinking lumber
551:
Agreed. And when the IWW called for abolishing communism, how is that really different from right-wing groups calling for abolishing socialism (as in Social Security)? Wobs argued for nonviolent, legal change most of the time. Arguing that they should have expected repression is like saying that the
476:
p.44: ".. (IWW) were particularly active in organizing foreign-born workers in the factories of the Norteast and among Mexican and Japanese workers in the mines and fields of the Southwest.. Early in the Mexican Revolution of 1910-1917, the IWW actively mobilized against threats by .. Taft to send in
168:
should there be a article separate from the main article on the IWWs involvement around the world? There is no mention on this page of wobblies Canada, Mexico, or Germany, past or present. There should be a place about current campaigns in Canada (Like the Ottawa Panhandlers union) and the creation
3962:
In addition, I do not understand the sentence "Between 2001 and 2003, there was a marked increase in UK membership, with the creation of the Hull GMB". Hull GMB is a part of of the Midlands and East Coast Region of the GMB union - one of the UK's leading trades unions and nothing to do with the IWW.
3876:
There's been a slow-boiling edit war for a period of years over the IWW's membership numbers, and I'm trying to understand why this number is there at all, at least in the form it is. Whether or not you are currently paying dues, you remain a member of the IWW until such time as you relinquish your
3458:
is a complete waste of time and should be a redirect, and someone (but not me) should be having this same discussion over there. 2) This article at present is a sub-stub and should be merged on principle. 3) BUT: The IWW article already discusses the slogan in a reasonably detailed section. So, I
2716:
The practice of dropping references to "sabotage" in articles about the IWW creates a hot-button situation; the IWW defined sabotage somewhat differently than does mainstream society, and that should be addressed when passages like this one are inserted. In any case, there were probably thousands of
2304:
The job delegate system is old-fashioned, awkward, clunky and slow. But it has one significant benefit beyond keeping union money out of the boss's hands. Every member who pays dues has the ability to talk to the delegate about wages, working conditions, hours of work, and other concerns, every time
2284:
There is an important practical aspect of this philosophy. Since the IWW believes that the corporations are conducting what amounts to a class war against working people, it stands to reason that IWW members won't stand for what has become the routine practice of virtually all business unions, which
2072:
I'm not part of the labour union project, but IWW is "high" in importance IMO, far more so for its past than any current influence, which seems to be quite minimal. It is high not only for its early 20th century size and influence, but also how it created in many American minds a perception for good
1485:
The question is which membership number to use in the article, the total ~2000 or the ~900 in good standing. The article has gone back and forth between the two for the past few months. I'm going to put in both, with a note about the requirements for good standing, and would appreciate a note here
1039:
Please stop mentioning that the IWW is an example of "anarchosyndicalism in practice" or things like that, the IWW is NOT an anarchosyndicalist organization, in fact all of the first General Executive Board members were also in the Socialist Party!! I am a libertarian socialist, and while the IWW is
487:
Finally (speaking as metallurgical non-expert, not citing from article anymore), the story about silver mining is not disproven by this sort of thing. The deportation train was paid for by Phelps-Dodge, but I think different metal deposits are often co-located. Also, labor relationships were very,
336:
Wasn't this organization founded for, or at least largely by, the Mexican-American miners of Arizona in the early 1900s (who, among other things, faced segregation, poor housing, and a dual-wage system, often in towns owned/ran entirely by mining companies) ? If it wasn't founded for that, it was at
3958:
For example this sentence: "More recently, IWW members were involved in the Liverpool dockers' strike that took place between 1995 and 1998, and numerous other events and struggles throughout the 1990s and 2000s, including the successful unionising of several workplaces, such as support workers for
3954:
Until I read this section, I had no idea that the IWW still existed in the UK, nor did any of my colleagues and friends within the trades union movement that I have asked since then. Whilst it is, of course, important to record that the organisation does still exisit, I feel that this section needs
3904:
Perhaps the wikipedia entry on the Industrial Workers of the World should be divided into two articles. One, a dispassionate examination of the IWW as an actual social phenomenon of the early 20th century. And then, the version currently displayed on wikipedia. This version is credible only to a
3812:
Someone has nominated the list of notable IWW union shops for deletion, and I'm concerned that the decision of whether or not to keep the list will be made by people who are not familiar with the 105 year history of the IWW. I'd appreciate it if some folks with knowledge of the subject could weigh
3598:
To members of the IWW, the wage is not equivalent to pay. The wage connotes that portion of the monies generated by an enterprise that is handed over to working people to purchase their hours on the job. The wage is significant to Wobblies in particular for what it fails to include, and that is the
2862:
All the above comments were mine, not all are signed due to some glitch or another. I've just substabtially rewritten the Australian section, based on Ian Turner's (histroian not footballer) account as referenced. There needs to be a separate article on Tom Barker too. His dictionary of biuography
2264:
But not the IWW. The Preamble of the IWW Constitution retains all of its class analysis and fire-breathing rhetoric from the very first convention in 1905. The IWW will never find itself in the role of enforcing company rules against the workers, for the IWW is a worker's union. It is controlled by
2244:
All of the AFL unions over the years softened the rhetoric of their Preambles, with their most immediate goal of signing contracts, to the extent that they became almost cheerleaders for corporate control. They found signing contracts and locking up a dues base to be preferable to waging a tireless
262:
The article says "The origin of the nickname "Wobbly" is unclear. Some believe it refers to a tool known as a "wobble saw", while others believe it is derived from an immigrant's mispronunciation of "IWW" as "eye-wobble-you-wobble-you"." The previous story on those lines that I heard attributed it
3563:
shows that at least one person read "they contend that the wage system should be abolished" as "they contend that all workers should be paid the same amount", which isn't the same thing at all. Perhaps we need to un-jargon that a bit (do most people even understand what "the wage system" means?).
2917:
I think that you have essentially stated the answer. The IWW exists within a system that values profits, and enshrines the wage system as an essential mechanism to insure that profits may be distributed upward. The IWW values things differently, but for the near-term must still operate within that
2906:
I may be way off base, but the wobb site is asking for 15 dollars American for an IWW hat on the website (as an example). It seemed a bit hypocritical to charge well over production cost for an item that advertises for an organization whose stated goal is to overthrow capitalism. I understand that
2143:
The Industrial Workers of the World is a very different sort of union from the mainstream unions that so many folks are familiar with. A couple of examples. The IWW doesn't believe in signing contracts with no-strike clauses. Not that it is unheard of, there is at least one IWW job branch that has
2120:
As is we have the number of members @ 2000 and "members in good standing" @ 900. I am not sure about the wisdom of identifying how many members are in good standing. That seems like an internal IWW issue that doesn't belong here. If they have 2000 members the article should reflect this and not
1919:
I changed that the SF socialists arguement was the most believable, because it aint. Mark Leier describes his extensive search for a verifiable answer, and sticks with the Chinese restauranteur theory, but admits that it is unverifiable. The other source cited here gives the various explainations,
1419:
The early ideas about the IWW's philosophy are quite clear. To those who suggest that this main IWW article ought to purport that the organization is in some sense syndicalist or anarcho-syndicalist, i am not aware of even one modification of the IWW constitution that has embraced such a change of
1128:
While one may argue that the IWW is an "anarcho-syndicalist" union, it is not explicitly so and never will be. The reason for this is that the IWW aligns itself with neither political ideologies nor political parties. There are anti-capitalists of all stripes in the IWW; aligning itself with any
1078:
If you look at the 1905-1924 or so Wobbly literature, you will see that they were as anti-socialist as they were anti-Salvation-Army. Some members and leaders may have been socialists but officially they didn't see replacing capitalist bosses with government bosses as being any real solution. Many
1029:
The IWW had nearly 700 of their organisers convicted in US Courts of 'Criminal Syndicalism' and they were locked up for ten years. That was what broke the back of the Union for so long. Sam Mainwaring who coined the phrase 'Anarcho-Syndicalism', according to a trouble making American woman,(Emma
931:
To the end of promoting industrial unity and of securing necessary discipline within the organization, the IWW refuses all alliances, direct or indirect, with any political parties or anti-political sects, and disclaims responsibility for any individual opinion or act which may be at variance with
366:
Having reviewed the IWW's website, I find no mention of silver mining. Apparently it was not as instrumental in this organization's history as I thought it was! I would like to leave these comments up for a little while so those keeping score can figure it out--then I'll come back (or someone else
3579:
Yeah, I agree, I don't think most know what that means. Whenever I've brought up the subject with anyone they seem to think it's synonymous with difference in income. In fact, when I try to explain people generally don't understand the concept of not having wages, they simply can't get their head
2314:
Now i want to talk briefly about the red card. To every IWW member, the red membership card is sort of sacred, almost like a religious icon that denotes not just membership, but common cause with all other working people. Yet the IWW is to a great extent a union of the working poor, the folks who
1704:
Can anyone provide a source to back up the claim about "management sending in the Salvation Army band to cover up the Wobbly speakers"? There doesn't seem to be any consensus on this in the online sources I can find on the subject, and the most detailed account I did find of relations between the
1570:
This organization takes note of which members are in good standing, most do not. Also, it is saying that a member is not in good standing if they have not been active for a period of two months, there is no reference to 'the recent past', it's like saying that a magazine subscription will run out
633:
The only line that I can see as being even arguably 'non-factual' would be the first for containing the clause "The effectiveness of the IWW's non-violent tactics..." This implies that the IWW as a labor organization, and their tactics at the time were effective, which from my study I find to be
567:
In addition a quick look at membership statistics for the AF of L shows a sharp decline following the the war. They fell from 5 million members in 1920 to 3.4 million by the end of the decade. This severe membership decline during the "post war boom" is evidence of a general assualt on organized
3779:
was turned over to the lynch mob by jail guards, had his teeth smashed with a rifle butt, was castrated, lynched three times in three separate locations, and then his corpse was riddled with bullets before it was disposed of in an unmarked grave. The official coroner's report listed the victim's
3626:
What the IWW Preamble refers to as the wage system, therefore, is the collection of laws, management practices, enforcement agencies, courts, and government oversight that perpetuate the existing unequal employer/employee relationship. Abolishing the wage system, in essence, means abolishing the
2949:
Also consider, the IWW attempts to insure that all such goods are union-made. Since unions generally gain higher wages for their members, that tends to make the hats just a little more expensive. It is a good bargain for all of us, because it not only helps those who create the hats, it helps to
2361:
I was the one who originally decided to report two numbers. I did so in order to end edit-warring last spring and summer over which number to use in the article -- the 2000 that was originally there (at least when I started watching it) or the 900 that was reported in the general organizational
2185:
The IWW has a Preamble that acknowledges the stark differences between the workers and corporate owners. As a matter of interest, the old AFL started out with a similar Preamble. Back in the middle of the industrial revolution, it was quite obvious to most working people what the exploitation of
1879:
As for the IWW being 'currently' headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, that is somewhat accurate since the location of the headquarters DOES change with the election of each new Secretary-General. For example, for many years, through the 1980's and 1990's, the HQ was located in Ypsilanti, Michigan
152:
The problem lies in disputed definitions of anarcho-syndicalism. The IWW differs in its organizational practices from the International Workers Association (IWA), and some would regard the practices of the IWA as definitive of anarcho-syndicalism. Furthermore the IWW is in principle open to (for
2421:
This article includes the following paragraph, "In the early 2000's the IWW organized Stonemountain and Daughter Fabrics, a fabric/seamstress shop in Berkeley. The shop has remained IWW and contracted through today." I am unclear as to the meaning of the second half of the second sentance. It
2324:
Alright, to bring this full circle. The membership of a business union is precise, tracked week by week, computerized. The current membership of the IWW depends upon the many job delegates out there who may have difficulty filing their own reports on time, because they're not paid by the union.
1732:
Can't someone come up with good articles for many of the famous songs, Salvation Army-related or not? Songs like "Union Maid" and "I Dreamed I Saw Joe Hill Last Night", especially? I'm not a Wobbly, but these songs had an indisputible impact on American history, and are much more deserving of
1643:
The term "notorious" seems sort of POV and the sentence itself is somewhat misleading. I think if the article is going to imply Starbucks refuses to allow its employees the ability to join a union a citation is in order. Especially since there are numerous Starbucks employees that are in fact
1409:
The point is, we have our own economic philosophy and political views, formed in the crucible of our own experience, and delineated by the constitutional prohibition against alliances with political parties. The ideas that animate the organization have been described by advocates with only one
1117:
was a lifelong member of the Socialist party as well and in the 1920s emigrated to the USSR and actively worked with Lenin there. If you were to ask any Wob today what their political beliefs are you would probibly get a wide range of answers from "liberal-Democrat" to "anarcho-syndicalist" to
1040:
close to anarchosyndicalism, and in my view very uncorruptable with its present constiution etc., I repeat, it is NOT an anarchosyndicalist organization, and it is misleading (and damaging to the organization!!!) to write it is an example of "anarchosyndicalism in practice" or stuff like that.
2167:
I first became aware of a very different sort of union after having spent twenty-five years in the IBEW, an AFL-CIO union. I attended an IWW general membership branch meeting, and the workers there were talking about how the union could best make use of someone's life savings, that they had
1869:
I couldn't agree more about describing the IWW as "famous" - I found the word immediately distracting. If the IWW didn't have some kind of fame, it wouldn't deserve an article. Seems to me that the job of an article is to explain why a subject is significant, rather than just saying that it
3616:
Abolishing the wage system does not mean abolishing pay. Rather, it means ending the employer/employee relationship as it currently exists, and which allows employers to routinely appropriate all generated wealth over and above labor costs (and other expenses) for themselves. This includes
537:
That misses the significance of the IWW completely, as their influence goes well beyond their numbers in the period before the 1930s. Moreover, the CIO didn't exist until 1935, long after the wobs went into decline, and many joined the communists, who in turn inject some energy and applied
122:
One point puzzles me: the statement that "After the passage of the Landrum-Griffin Act in 1959 by the US Government (which essentially legalized purges of leftist union leadership) . . ." I can understand making this comment about the Taft-Hartley Amendments of 1948, although even that is
1880:
where Fred Chase, then-Secretary-General, lived. Then Alexis Bus became SG and the HQ was moved to Philadelphia. Now it is in Cincinnati with the new SG. It is more than likely that when the next SG is elected, they won't be in Cincinnati. It could well be in Boston or San Francisco.
1180:
As a former member of the IWW and the last secretary of the Allentown, Pennsylvania branch of the IWW before its closure, I can tell you this: the IWW certainly espouses anarcho-syndicalism, and such is the identity of the overwhelming majority of Wobblies that it certainly justifies the
518:
Of course an organization that calls strikes as "direct action" for its stated aim of abolishing capitalism is going to be "repressed" by the government. The intro should mention, aside from an "internal split" and "government repression," that the IWW was always marginal compared to the
3234:
and this article. The injury article is unsourced and contains little more than 1-2 lines of information noting the use of the slogan by the IWW. Rather than subject this article to the deletion process, I would prefer it be discussed here by the community. A similar merger has been
774:
both have more substantive information, and would be useful in fleshing out that stub. But what, if, anything, can "second major labor dispute in the U.S.A." mean? There had by this time been dozens of violent labor disputes in the US, many of them on a larger scale than this one. --
345:
It's possible Mexican-American miners were a significant chunk of the membership at some point -- I don't know anything about it. I'm pretty certain it wasn't instrumental in the founding, though -- so far as I know, the founding section of the article is pretty accurate.
3330:
You're following me and trying to undo anything I add to any articles. The history speaks for itself. Re: the 'injury to one' article. Other mottos like "No War but the Class War" have their own page. This is further proof that you're voting based upon your political
337:
least a pretty significant part of IWW history--I heard all this in my Chicano History class, so I may be blowing it out of proportion, but I don't see a single mention of Mexican-Americans in this article. I don't know enough about it yet to add anything in, though.
79:
While the article is obviously written by a member or sympathizer, and accordingly tends to overstate the present importance of the organization, that doesn't offend me, even if it is not a NPOV. Later additions will flesh out the earlier history, which matters more.
2563:
Note: i have deleted this entire section that was just added to the article by an unidentified individual. Reasons: it is speculative. If offers no sources. It is unnecessary. It doesn't deal with the real organizational differences (not that adding these would save
3950:
As someone who has been heavily involved in the UK labour movement for the past 30 years, I have to take issue with the tone of the "In the UK" section, which seriously exaggerates the importance of this organisation within the UKs modern political landscape.
424:
User:disbomber is correct about the Mexican-American history, although I think the connection is stronger during 'later' years of the IWW. From its start, IWW included many immigrants: discussion in 1905 Chicago founding conference about calling each other
2633:
I think Richard was correct to remove the previous section, only because it was not sourced and therefore comes off like original research. Vert et Noir, do you have any sources/cites to support the notion that the Wobblies advocate anarchosyndicalism?
2343:
I am not the one who decided to report two numbers, one showing currently paid up membership, the other showing those who hold red cards. But i understand why it is a better reflection of the actual numbers of individuals committed to this organization.
896:
Another theory is that it was a term coined in San Francisco or Seattle (I forgot where) by an owner of a Chinese resturant where Wobs used to gather. The owner could not pronounce his W's correctly so he called the group wobbley's. And so the name just
3052:
was the Canadian part of the IWW. As far as I know, this wasn't the case; they were totally different organizations, despite some points of similarity and possibly some overlap in terms of membership. I'll check this out and make some changes later.
1533:
Could someone please supply the cited source for this figure? I cannot rightfully edit this page as I have recently become a member of the IWW and it would be in violation of the spirit of WP:NPOV if I were to make any further changes. Thank you.
3955:
to put it into context. With a membership of around 400 people UK-wide, a low profile, and no TUC (Trades Union Council) membership, it does not wield the influence nor have the recognition in the UK that the language used in this section implies.
1718:
I could probably dig out a source if I still have my old folder o' stuff, but it was definitely part of Wobbly folklore that this happened. As for finding another source, I suspect you could dig something up out of Google's new academic services.
3315:
That's a bold accusation. I contest it. I submit that a merger proposal to merge a slogan associated with the IWW to the IWW is perfectly reasonable. Further, it is interesting that a request for sources has drawn an accusation of 'stalking'.
2712:'s biographer notes that he "regarded the Wobblies as a welcome addition to the Socialist cause, although he never joined them in going so far as to recommend sabotage." She mentions a personal meeting between London and Big Bill Haywood in 1912. 3699:
What do folks think about creation of a sub-category from the Industrial Workers of the World category for "Shops of the Industrial Workers of the World"? Currently, to my knowledge, there are just two notable Wobbly shops on Knowledge (XXG),
958:
They are typically regarded as an anarchist organization, so the template might belong. I won't re-insert it though without support from someone else, because it is questionable. I did add anarcho-syndicalism to the see also section though.
2274:
In short, unlike so many other unions currently in existence, the IWW is not a business union. It isn't operated like a business, and its members believe that it is one of the few unions in existence that operates according to "true" union
2073:
or bad (mostly the latter) of socialism and anarcho-syndicalism, especially the former. "Wobbly" was often used as an epithet when I was younger for someone who seemed to be a little too ardent, in the opinion of others, in his unionism.
2484:
How many readers want to know which delegates, from which organizations, attended the founding convention, and how the power was distributed among them? This stuff is great for buffs, but it will cause the average reader to quit reading.
1162:
may not have called themselves anarcho-syndicalists, but many of their ideas can be traced directly to the Black International's Pittsburgh Manifesto, and many important members like Thomas Haggerty and William Trautmann were anarchists.
2932:
Compare the subminimum cost, three dollars per month, to the hundred or two hundred dollar dues payments assessed by many other unions. You can see that the IWW is intent upon lowering all barriers to membership among the most exploited
3175:
Is it actually relevant to include a whole paragraph about the Lexington Avenue bomb? Out of, what, four conspirators, one of them was an IWW member, and nobody's claiming it was officially ordered or sanctioned by the IWW as a whole.
3783:-POV issue. The given source relates to the gravesite. There is no explanation of the cause of the murder, nor a source relating to motive. Motive being connection to IWW would require citation. Passage at present reads like hearsay. 3673:'PREAMBLE...Instead of the conservative motto, "A fair day's wage for a fair day's work," we must inscribe on our banner the revolutionary watchword, "Abolition of the wage system."' IWW Membership Card (5 year), 2009 issue, page 3. 1503:
I don't get the problem. You don't have to be in good standing to be a member. Members that aren't in good standing are still members. So the article should read that there are about 2000 members, 900 of which are in good standing.
1399:
of the IWW went through the cauldron of anti-political factionalism, when the politicos such as Daniel DeLeon (and even Debs) were encouraged by a series of dramatic amendments to the IWW's constitution that were championed by the
568:
labor, whether radical or no. I don't think any rational labor historian would argue that the IWW's loss of membership was a result of "destitute" sectors coming to their senses and joining "real" labor unions. (Labor Statistics:
867:
I don't know where to put this to keep it organized, but does anyone know why they were called wobblies? It would be a significant contribution to the article to include why they were called wobblies instead of just the I.W.W.
90:
preamble is quoted. Either the 1905 or 1908 preambles oughta be here. (Using both would require much better treatment of the 1908 split). The stuff about Green Mother Earth was not there during IWW's organizational heyday!
2154:
situation results in two things — contracts are easier to get with the companies, but the unions signing those contracts are unable to stand together to support each other. Imagine being a union member on strike, and seeing
3617:
confiscation of productivity increases over many decades, which is one of the reasons working people may perpetually have difficulty paying the rent or the mortgage, and owners/investors may become wealthy or ultra-wealthy.
3109:
Can more please be added for times between the World Wars? As the time when the organisation reached its greatest heights, it would seem appropriate to have significant coverage of the period, but there's almost nothing.
3966:
Finally, the sentence "2006 saw the IWW formally registered by the UK government as a recognised trade union" is misleading. Registration is self-nominating and implies nothing other than statutory legislation compliance.
593:. I will take a look at this section in the coming weeks, and see if there are POV issues that can be resolved. I hope to eventually reach a point where we can remove the POV tag. One of the obvious improvements will be 2234:
But it didn't last. Companies refused to recognize militant unions. Companies declared, if you're going to organize OUR workers, you need to understand — we only deal with organizations that respect the prerogatives of
502:
FWIW the Wobbly explanatiuon of that incident was that they were striking to protest the copper mines' owners profiteering - they were sitting on huge hoards of copper to drive prices up. Hardly unlikely in those days.
1566:
is also imprecise and quickly becomes inaccurate for an undated article to include a relative reference to the recent past rather than a specific reference to dates. When is the last two months in an undated article?
882:
it remarks, accurately, "The origin of the nickname "Wobbly" is unclear" and goes on to mention a few hypotheses; I've heard others as well, including one about a Chinese member's inability to pronounce "double-U". --
1523:
I suspect there are a LOT of members who pay when they meet their delegates, and if they don't meet the delegates often, they're only in good standing now and then. Indeed, most of them probably fit that description.
3068:
When I first saw that, I knew something was wrong, but I couldn't find any resources to change it. as far is I know, they where two Different organizations, but they recognized each other cards as interchangeable.
2840:
That was my unsigned comment! I want to improve the Australian IWW coverage it is worth a main article. There were significant differences between the Aus and US IWWs and the effect on Australian history was great.
1420:
direction over the years. In my view anarcho-syndicalists are welcome in the organization, and their ideas are also respected; attempts to change or re-interpret the organization's historical underpinnings are not.
1775:
They put out a record of Wobbly songs around 1990. I'd bet the home office still has some. An ebay search could probably find it. There was also the "little red songbook." Probably still available for a few bucks.
303:
It would be better if the article made clear that the IWW was really knocked down by having over six hundred of its organisers imprisoned for ten year terms for Criminal Syndicalism. Direct Capitalist Action!
2805:. Mackie's IWW memebership is not mentioned in his article, oddly, although it is not in doubt; he was for years a regular contributor to the Industrial Worker reporting on Australian labour affairs. The poet 1549:
Good grief, aren't Wobs allowed to edit this page? A lot of us would have to recuse ourselves, then. There are more up-to-date figures in the GOB, but that's not easy for people outside the IWW to verify.
235:
Searching for "Industrial Workers of the World" returns no results, I had to search for "IWW" to find this page. Perhaps there should be a redirect? I'm kinda new here and I don't know how to do that myself.
3580:
around it. Anyhow, I'm rambling, I think that there should be a short elaboration on what 'abolishment of wage labour' signifies, as the average person coming across this won't know what it is referring to.
2756:
I have edited to clarify some of the history relating to the IWW's anti-war stance, and added citations. I would like to see the POV template removed from this section, but i don't think it is quite ready.
1414:. If we add "revolutionary" to distinguish our philosophy from the structural principles adopted in adulterated form by the CIO, we are still in accord with an expression used by early exponents of IWW'ism. 1118:"socialist". As for political orientation, the IWW rules and regulations state that the IWW is strictly non-political. The IWW is forbidden to endorse any political candidate or any political point of view. 1452:
since, according to IWW Bilaws a "member in good standing" is any member who has paid his or her dues for the last two month. This number changes constantly. But the number of card holders is much higher.
3959:
the Scottish Socialist Party.". It lacks any citation, and the reference to support workers for the Scottish Socialist Party makes no sense. There has never been a struggle to unionise these workers.
3757:
presented an IWW member as a particularly despicable villain and traitor. A wave of such incitement led to vigilante mobs attacking the IWW in many places, and after the war the repression continued.
659:
First sentence now reads: "The IWW's efforts were met with violent reactions from all levels of government, from company management and their agents, and groups of citizens functioning as vigilantes."
1809:
headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. The last change I made was just to move the statement of the IWW philosophy out of the middle of the more general description to the start of the next paragraph. --
1079:
may have felt socialism was a "second best" to the total workplace-and-political democracy they demanded, and that working towards socialism was better than the unrestrained capitalism present then.
4050:
Seems to single out one political party with no justification that i can see. The Socialist Labor Party was at least as involved in the founding as was the Socialist Party, and i'm not aware of any
1463:
Pierce: that's not accurate. The IWW calls members who are within 3 months of being paid up in full as "in good standing." After this, members recieve a letter from GHQ reminding them to pay up.
3345:
It isn't "proof of political bias" at all. Somehow you've invented this vague charge that I'm inserting bias into wikipedia by not editing pages. I find that curious. Also, you have chosen to
4069:
I am inclined to support (or do some direct action, and just do it) to removing that link. It goes to a party founded in 1973 in one place, 1962 in another and I see no connection to the IWW.
1240:
That one reference to anarcho-syndicalism clearly implies that there are differences between anarcho-syndicalism and the philosophy of the IWW, yet holds out the hope that these can be overcome:
677:
I've been reading and re-reading the section and I see no problem with it as it currently stands. Since no objections have been raised since 2005 would it be appropriate to remove the NPOV tag?
1200:
That is not to say that we don't have members who are anarcho-syndicalist. The same is true of anarchist, and council communist, and anarcho-whatever. One of the main goals of the IWW is to be
816:
magnates" for agreeing to such reforms, an IWW strike forced these concessions." This seems very POV to me. It takes a very aggressive tone, in fact not only making a claim about the IWW but
948:
tag from the top of the page. It seemed out of place to have a large political template so prominently placed. The article is about the IWW, not Anarchism. Perhaps a link in ==See also==? --
3814: 3806: 2255:
UNION that is obligated (by contract) to get those workers back on the job, even to inflict appropriate punishment on the very workers they're supposed to represent, to accomplish the task.
3607:
referred to as "unpaid labor") that is diverted (via the "system") to owners and investors. The wage system acts as an upper limit on the wealth that working families are able to acquire.
2704:
I've removed this paragraph from the IWW article for lack of relevance and unnecessary duplication. It is copied from the Jack London page, where (unlike here) it is properly foot-noted:
2450:
There is a line in the IWW Australia section that quotes the cartoon as exhorting "workers follow your leaders". I checked around and I wonder if 'leaders' should actually be 'masters'?
2598:
4- The IWW doesn't want to alienate members or potential members who do not at the moment share the long term goals of the organization but are interested in struggling against bosses.
1262:
In fact if you wish to make comparisons about use of terminology in the organization's pamphlets, i'll do the heavy typing for you, here are all of the instances that Google can locate:
1129:
particular political movement would be exclusionary. It is a union for ALL workers - all that is needed is the constitution. The IWW's stance is in the preamble for anyone to see. --
213: 3349:
the stalking accusation. A cursory look at my contributions will show that your pages, edits, etc do not figure in significantly. Would you care, at any point, to offer a reason why
1671:
is scissorbilling for Starbucks on all Knowledge (XXG) pages. Probably a low-level manager with the self-appointed mission of stamping out class awareness wherever coffee is poured.
1644:
members of a union. And I'd wager Starbucks is not a fan of unions but that is pretty typical. I don't know of any publicly held companies that roll out a red carpet for unions.
2993:
One more thing to be aware of, if you pay through a local organization, then the local organization gets to keep half of the dues for local usage. Local branches can be found here:
1895:
I removed the theory that Harrison Grey Otis invented the term "Wobblies", since I only found it in a footnote in that book, and the other theories all seem much more credible.--
433:
citizens -- hence, "Fellow Worker," instead. IWW remained a militant defender of immigrants (and black workers, too). _Internationalist_ No. 2 (April-May 1997) had an article,
2589:
act prohibits "communist" union leadership, and the term "communist" in the US is used broadly and can encompass a variety of leftist ideologies, including anarchosyndicalism.
187:
and pointed it here. It seems to be another name for this organization, though it's not mentioned in the article yet... If I'm in error, please don't hesitate to fix it... —
3127:
there is not much about the iww in between the worldwars as the iww was broken up by the state at with the first world war. union members where inprisoned and/or killed ...
2548:
page, it says Woody was a member of the IWW. Have just spent a while trying to track down the Phil Ochs situation, am now wondering if anyone can confirm Woody's membership.
2362:
bulletin. I didn't consider any deeper meanings or implications; I just tried to reach a compromise in the simplest way I saw possible (relatively successfully, I think). -
820:
another claim, and there's no source. I think that it needs to be both toned down in general (for neutral POV) and there needs to be a source cited. I therefore put in a
1586:
I removed the section that refers to the number of members in good standing. This information is not relevant to the article, and will never be accurate - atleast till
636:"The IWW's efforts were met with violent reactions from the all levels of the government as well as company management and groups of citizens functioning as vigilantes" 2187: 414:. I think the references should stay. The IWW was highly egalitarian and its organizing drives reflected this. But the discussion could be better contextualized. 66: 195:
International Workers of the World is an incorrect name for the organization. The redirect should probably stand, though, because it's a frequent mistake. See
2498:
Sounds good to me. As long as it's all easy to find, and the new articles are Prominently linked. Maybe a template would help if it's more than 2 new articles.
1034: 2760:
Specifically, i have concerns about the information in the article about Wesley Everest. I'd like to see a source for that information, if it can be verified.
2773:
My reason-- it conflicts with other (admittedly vague) sources that i have read recently. I wouldn't mind seeing it added in again, if a source can be cited.
132:
The Industrial Workers of the World, a once-powerful labor movement, is considered a leading organ of the anarcho-syndicalist philosophy in the United States.
4019: 2422:
sounds wrong/unclear/meaningless to me, but perhaps I am missing something. Or perhaps this is too nit-picky? Forgive me if so, I'm new to updating pages.
2295:
their dues. The job delegate then issues the member stamps which are pasted in a membership book, the famous Wobbly "red card," to demonstrate paid up dues.
243:
links here (but might not have at the time this comment was written). But the remark above is unclear about what search tool the person is talking about. -
3881:
in bad standing" according to the constitution. You can't vote at meetings, you can't run for GST, you can't get funding from the GDC, but you're still a
3508:-- The motto, while coined by the Wobs, has been used extensively by other labour organizations over the years and is no longer exclusive to the Wobs. If 1139:
Anarchosyndicalist unions also admit workers of all ideologies or none. In practice, the IWW is an anarchosyndicalist group, even if it isn't in theory.
2575:
Although it's hard to find differences between the IWW's goals (e.g. abolition of bosses and the wage system, worker's self-management etc) and those of
1620:
I uploaded a slightly different logo. I thought the old one was just a little low-res. There are a few different ones out there, so I took this one from
2944:
No one forces you to buy a Wobbly hat, or a button. But your boss may force you to feel the need for union membership, whether you can afford it or not.
2519: 2453: 2392: 1733:
articles IMO than many recent rock and rap songs which almost no one will remember 40-50 years from now but have good articles in Knowledge (XXG) now.
1466: 378: 311: 281: 1854:
Ha. Well, I don't really object to changing it back if currently is more apro. (I'm from a small town myself, so I won't make any Cincinnati jabs...)--
3387: 845:
Here's a decent reference on the timber strike from a reliable online source, HistoryLink, probably the best online reference for Washington history:
2791:(1922-1978), my source, was an important labour histroian. He should have an article of his own. Here is his Dictioanry of National biography entry: 597:. But i must say, the discussion on this topic so far doesn't provide any specific complaints about the article as it exists, just generalizations. 527:. Radicalism was certainly appealing to sectors of the destitute during the Great Depression but not after the wartime recovery and post-war boom. 375:
Not being mentioned on the web site doesn't mean it didn't happen, just that the site writers didn't know about it or left it out for some reason.
3990: 3651:
An interesting (to me) side note here is that the only mention of "wages" in the index of my Preamble and Constitution is page 11 where I found, "
3463:
originally came up with the slogan (see that article). (If everyone who works on an article is a Wob, do we add a union bug in the corner? ;) )
3301:
This user has been stalking me. He routinely makes changes to the articles I've just made. I believe that his vote to merge this was in bad faith.
1310:
In fact, Bill Haywood briefly discussed the differences between the IWW's revolutionary industrial unionism, and syndicalism in his autobiography.
1845:
It sounds temporary because it is temporary; it's likely to change again when somebody gets elected GST who doesn't want to move to Cincinnati.
4109:
Is there a source for the 12,000 current members in the IWW? Previous edits claimed there were 2,000 members with about 900 in good standing.
2787:
I've just added a little extra on the IWW's role in Australia during World War One, it was of major historical significance for this country.
2158:
union members crossing your picket line to do your job. Sorry to say, that's somewhat standard practice among the craft unions of the AFL-CIO.
3350: 3231: 3157: 2685:
and/or anything else that can help those seeking an understanding beyond what is provided in the article. Go for it. This all seems like
1341:, syndicalism isn't mentioned once. Yet there are repeated references to precisely what the IWW espouses, which is organizing industrially: 1146: 524: 411: 407: 47: 17: 108:
I have to say that CURRENTLY, it seems pretty balanced, and doesn't seem to overstate the importance of the organization, such as it is.
4116: 3833: 3198: 2523: 2396: 2369: 1493: 1478: 1169: 741: 323: 293: 2613:
Regardless of what their website may say, the Wobblies are a Revolutionary Anarchosyndicalist union. They advocate anarchosyndicalism.
1819:
I believe "currently" (or something like that) is probably appropriate, because for a century or so it was headquartered in Chicago. -
3267:
This motto is a hundred years old and very well known in the activist and workers union communities. I think it warrants its own page.
2829: 1601: 1047: 722: 209: 184: 3156:
I know that the IWW is against conscription, but is there any chance that someone would expand on why they are against conscription?
3749: 3134: 1832:
It just sounds so temporary. It's true that they were in Chicago for 85 years, but wouldn't that and the stays in San Francisco and
2918:
system. The differences are reflected in what the IWW offers, taking into account what is essential to membership, and what is not.
2465: 3034:
What about a listing of officers? What about an explanatiion of why the headquarters keeps moving with the General Secretary? --
2488:
I don't want to throw any of the content away. But i plan to move parts of a few sections to new pages, and will provide links.
3798: 3354: 969:
I had already added anarcho-syndicalism, who took the liberty to remove it without informing the other authours of this page? -
879: 2717:
notable individuals who had opinions about the IWW, and Jack London's opinion has no greater relevance than the rest of them.
1750:
That would be a great project for someone. I'm too backed up with other things to do. Does someone want to carry this ball? -
267:
I had always heard that the Wobblies were 'wobbly' because their anti-conscription politics made them unreliable World War 1.
3569: 3181: 2889: 2325:
They're workers who take on that extra responsibility in addition to their every day jobs, because they believe in the union.
1555: 915:
political group of ideology on this page. The IWW is an a-political organization, as per Article 4 of the IWW Constitution.
3849:
This article makes no mention of IWWs involvement in the Mexican Revolution. Several members fought under the direction of
2265:
the rank and file, and it operates according to the premise that the workers and the bosses do not have anything in common.
2176:
That was around 1985, and i was just beginning to learn about this organization called the Industrial Workers of the World.
1191:
While it is not "wrong" to observe that the IWW has similarities to anarcho-syndicalist organizations, that term is by far
3551:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2819: 1360:, syndicalism isn't mentioned. Yet Industrial unionism is in the title. Ettor declares flatly, "we industrial unionists." 2579:, wobblies do not call the IWW an "anarchosyndicalist" organization; rather, they prefer the label "revolutionary union" 2741:
That would be a significant improvement, in my view. I also wouldn't mind if the section was made into a separate page.
2435:
I'll fix it. It means that the shop has remained under contract with the IWW workers. That there is a labor contract.
2334:
The membership measuring stick that is typically used for business unions doesn't work for the IWW. That's plain to see.
2054: 520: 403: 390: 2015:
im busy with other online projects, but just to point out, connoly is well dead so the below rings far less than true!
569: 3390:
I should give my opinion there, so I did, and now I came here and people are discussing it here. Which should it be?
1070: 1060: 990: 981: 960: 3087:
The IWW was actually hostile to the OBU and the OBU had a sizable organization in the US for 5-10 years in the 1920s.
3705: 2172:... why would anyone bequeath sixty thousand dollars or so, probably all the money they had saved up in their life, 1435:
I added that there are only 908 members in good standing, thats what it says in my general organizational bulletin.
4084: 1106: 942: 357: 227: 38: 3862: 3653:
The General Executive Board (of the IWW) shall set the wages of all general organization employees and organizers.
4001:. This is because the article does include a fairly detailed discussion of some aspects of the IWW's philosophy. 3565: 3513: 3177: 1551: 3930:
This rant does nothing whatsoever to improve the article. Would you care to be more specific in your criticism?
3854: 3444: 3336: 3306: 3272: 3074: 2022:
also, connolly was active in ireland and would likely not have appreciated that place referred to as the "uk".
1323:
The I. W. W. is not a by-product of the syndicalist movement; it is a purely revolutionary industrial unionism.
1150: 3161: 4120: 3009:
is. That is the person responsible for collecting dues, and issuing dues stamps as a record of your payments.
1474: 1173: 4059: 4029: 3935: 3890: 3829: 3794: 3713: 3701: 3678: 3642: 3538: 3521: 2833: 2527: 2400: 1605: 794: 726: 319: 289: 4141: 4137: 4124: 4112: 4096: 4078: 4063: 4033: 3979: 3939: 3924: 3894: 3866: 3837: 3821: 3736: 3717: 3682: 3668: 3646: 3589: 3573: 3542: 3525: 3499: 3472: 3448: 3414: 3399: 3370: 3340: 3325: 3310: 3294: 3276: 3259: 3203: 3185: 3165: 3142: 3138: 3130: 3119: 3096: 3078: 3062: 3038: 3023: 2970: 2959: 2911: 2896: 2871: 2857: 2825: 2813: 2777: 2745: 2735: 2721: 2693: 2662: 2638: 2624: 2569: 2552: 2531: 2509: 2492: 2469: 2439: 2428: 2404: 2374: 2348: 2125: 2114: 2091: 2077: 2058: 2042: 2026: 2000: 1975: 1951: 1924: 1913: 1884: 1874: 1858: 1849: 1840: 1827: 1813: 1780: 1758: 1737: 1723: 1712: 1689: 1675: 1658: 1648: 1628: 1609: 1597: 1580: 1559: 1543: 1528: 1518: 1508: 1498: 1457: 1442: 1424: 1384:
Trautmann states in the very first sentence that the pamphlet is about "revolutionary industrial unionism."
1185: 1165: 1154: 1142: 1133: 1122: 1083: 1073: 1063: 1043: 1019: 993: 984: 963: 952: 901: 891: 856: 838: 828: 810: 783: 746: 718: 710: 681: 668: 642: 618: 575: 556: 542: 531: 507: 496: 480:
When US involvement in WW1 began, IWW copper strikes were branded acts of "German agents" by the likes of
445: 394: 251: 173: 157: 145: 112: 95: 3058: 3049: 2868: 2810: 2461: 2201:'A struggle is going on in the nations of the civilized world between the oppressors and the oppressed...' 1051: 761:
of August 3, 1913 was the second major labor dispute in the U.S.A. and supposedly initiated by the I.W.W.
154: 3975: 3724: 2845:'s letter published in Industrial Worker 1945 fills in some gaps about the period of marginal survival... 2651:
I'm going to assume that you don't want personal experience. Lemme see if I can dig something up online.
1959:
But, Jmabel, that's not really what the marker says – it says that it was the second major labor dispute
1846: 1680:
Probably! However he is correct - polemical language like that has no place in an encyclopedia article.--
1031: 1009:- this is a (primarily) US topic, so shouldn't we prefer US English on those grounds? Whichever way, the 3764: 2956: 1899: 1470: 1439: 699: 347: 315: 285: 217: 3790: 3092: 2854: 2436: 1709: 1515: 1297:, who put an indelible stamp upon the organization, back through earlier industrial unionists, such as 977: 3858: 2877: 2050: 308:
The IWW actually reached its peak membership in the years after WW1, while these wobs were in prison.
3850: 3754: 2595:
3- Wobblies believe that what's really important is not what a union calls itself, but what it does.
2457: 1539: 528: 471:
La clase obrera en la Historia de Me'xico, Vol 16: Al norte del Ri'o Bravo, pasando lejando 1600-1930
4156: 3971: 3970:
In general, the section would benefit from a less self-aggrandising approach, and far more citation.
3916: 3908: 1881: 1182: 4074: 3920: 3912: 3732: 3664: 3495: 3440: 3383: 3332: 3302: 3268: 3070: 2674: 2635: 2122: 1833: 1655: 1645: 872: 639: 170: 3088: 1706: 4055: 4025: 3931: 3886: 3825: 3709: 3674: 3638: 3534: 3517: 3509: 3468: 3455: 3428: 3395: 3192: 3020: 2774: 2742: 2718: 2576: 2566: 2549: 2489: 2363: 2345: 2046: 1936: 1871: 1855: 1837: 1810: 1672: 1625: 1505: 1487: 1421: 949: 735: 665: 615: 415: 134: 86:
I agree that bringing in more material will bring article closer to NPOV. It's problematic that
2516:
Good idea, as long as it is properly linked so those buffs can get to it easily.ANON 2 Apr.2007
1404:, to either give up their aggravating political infighting, or leave the union... (they left...) 4092: 3585: 3410: 3366: 3321: 3290: 3255: 3115: 3054: 2923:
For example, the best bargain offered by the IWW is the cost of membership, which ranges from
2886: 2732: 2678: 2653: 2615: 2500: 1576: 1372: 1093:
Why do i have to give a source for a fact very well known to those familiar with the IWW? See
1017: 1943:, but it's still nonsense: there had been dozens of major labor disputes before that time. - 429:(in spirit of French Revolution) was rejected precisely because so many initial members were 3436: 2604:
6- Capitalist and statist propaganda describes anarchism as an ideology of chaos and bombs.
2111: 1997: 1948: 1896: 1824: 1801:
union. Seems a bit like saying General Motors is a famous car manufacturer. Also, it is not
1755: 1685: 888: 853: 846: 807: 780: 707: 695: 678: 572: 386: 268: 248: 3358: 2976:
You will be quite welcome, thanks for considering membership. The online dues page is here:
2768:
Communist Party promises to reimburse those who had staked Haywood's bond went unfulfilled.
406:, a predecessor organization, which left the IWW around 1912 and later formed the core of 3487: 3460: 2425: 2084: 1535: 202: 196: 2809:
was also close to the IWW although he may not have actually signed on. There are others.
834:
Can't find cites but when I was in labor history, it was pretty much taken for granted.
614:
section of the IWW article as it now stands, please bring them forward now. Thanks all,
130:, but it doesn't say what those differences are. Also the anarcho-syndicalism page says 4070: 3776: 3728: 3660: 3491: 2690: 2088: 2023: 1964: 1302: 1110: 825: 798: 772: 654:
I've adopted that suggestion in slightly modified form, thanks. I believe it is better.
368: 338: 4015:
Renaming the article (as proposed) might increase the opportunity for incoming links.
2864: 2792: 3600: 3464: 3391: 2545: 1454: 1119: 898: 461:
is spotty in publication but good on scholarship. 1997 article cites Philip S. Foner
3427:
has already deemed it necessary to redirect this link to the IWW. Odd, isn't it how
3405:
It can be either. I just put it here because that is where the template link goes.
1967:", were well before the IWW. Would you argue that there had been "dozens" of prior 769: 570:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6535(196502)47%3A1%3C93%3ATUM1%3E2.0.CO%3B2-W)
4132: 4088: 3604: 3581: 3424: 3406: 3362: 3317: 3286: 3251: 3111: 2849:
Mrk MacGuire's article first publishe din Red & Black (aus anarchist journal):
2842: 2806: 2798: 2586: 2074: 1972: 1940: 1921: 1734: 1572: 1401: 1353: 1294: 1114: 1105:
participated in the foundation of the IWW. He was a Presidential candidate for the
1014: 762: 539: 493: 442: 92: 2389:
I find the first number alone to be acceptable and standard. ANON 5am 2 Apr. 2007
1094: 795:
A Union Shop on Every Block: As baristas seek to organize, the feds cite Starbucks
715:
I'd say Elizabeth Gurley Flynn was a notable member but she didn't make the list.
793:
If someone decides to improve the citation apparatus, you may want Philip Dawdy,
3768: 3432: 2967: 2908: 2709: 2134:
I'll talk about the membership issue, but first i want to offer some background.
2107: 1993: 1944: 1820: 1777: 1751: 1720: 1681: 1525: 1130: 1102: 1080: 1010: 970: 884: 849: 835: 803: 776: 703: 553: 504: 382: 244: 142: 141:
The IWW used to call themselves anarcho-syndicalists in their literature. FWIW.
109: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2846: 1639:(Starbucks) a company notorious for its refusal to allow workers to form unions 1204:. That is the reason the IWW rejected alliances with political parties in 1908. 438: 3035: 2893: 2802: 2801:, and in more recent times the leader of the great Mt Isa strike of the 1960s 2788: 188: 2850: 2686: 402:
The Mexican-American and/or silver miners may well have been members of the
2212:
The AFL retained that militance when it inerited the mantle from the FOTLU:
3789:
Move to delete both passages, as they are unsubstantiated and conjectural.
4011:
has very few incoming links, but could easily have a lot more, as written
1298: 765: 758: 128:
much in common with anarcho-syndicalist unions, but also many differences
3439:
or some other article. If you want to move this article discuss it here.
2981: 2883:
The Wobblies at War. A history of the IWW and the Great War in Australia
3483: 2682: 3727:
article, at one time rumored to be the largest IWW shop at the time.
1273:
There are sixteen instances of "syndicalism" or "anarcho-syndicalism."
3285:
Then I presume you've got some sources to back that claim up, right?
1797:
I tweaked the intro a bit. I removed the statement that the IWW is a
467:
Forging the Copper Collar: Arizona's Labor-Management War, 1901-1921
2731:
I suggest turning this section into a list instead of a paragraph.
2822:, Australian political activist and scholar, not the footballer. 2039:(1980) he was very active in the UK as well (outside of Ireland) 1209:
Browse the pamphlets that the union produced in its early decades:
764:". The citation is just a roadside historical marker. Our article 4157:
http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=5855116
3357:
that does not involve vague accusations against me or appeals to
2998: 1278:
Key in "industrial unionism" and you'll get thirty-six instances.
3772: 1113:, a devoted Marxist, also participated in the IWW's foundation. 1836:
be the kind of thing you would adress in the history section?--
1707:
http://washingtonhistory.org/wshs/columbia/articles/0304-a2.htm
3014:
If there is no local organization, paying online is just fine.
2601:
5- Some IWW members prefer not to call themselves anarchists.
1941:
there is a historical marker that say something to this effect
240: 25: 3005:
If you are able to contact a local organization, ask who the
1293:. The ideas behind industrial unionism can be traced through 1988:
Feel free to say that it was the second major labor dispute
4008:
has a number of unfinished sections, and so needs attention
2988:
There is a small initiation fee, i think it is ten dollars.
2186:
their labor was all about. The predecessor to the AFL, the
1939:
being "the second major labor dispute in the U.S.A.". yes,
1375:, the union's first general secretary, wrote the pamphlet, 1013:
change is to bypass a redirect, so ought to be reinstated.
4054:
justification for a SEE ALSO link to any political party.
3877:
red card. If you fall behind in your dues, you become "a
3516:, then it makes no sense to redirect "an injury..." here. 1621: 980:
removed it with no comment as to why and I reinserted it.
435:
Bisbee, Arizona Deportation of 1917: "Reds" and Immigrants
3048:
The section on the IWW in Canada makes it sound like the
2592:
2- There's a history of anarchist persecution in the US.
2106:
without citation. Does someone have something citable? -
698:
from the list of notable members, pending citation; see
552:
Quakers should expect it for opposing the war in Iraq.
214:
Special:Whatlinkshere/International Workers of the World
4131:
iww.org Contact General Headquarters (now in Chicago).
3560: 3240: 3236: 2103: 1289:
The IWW does, indisputably, adhere to the principle of
1007: 197:
http://www.iww.org/en/culture/myths/international.shtml
3999:
Industrial Workers of the World philosophy and tactics
3985:
Industrial Workers of the World philosophy and tactics
610:
So if anyone has specific complaints about POV in the
208:
I've just gone through and changed all the links to "
3219:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
589:
This section of the IWW article has apparently been
463:
US Labor Movement and Latin America Vol I: 1846-1919
3420:Okay, so I'll move it here. This is what it said: 3191:
I certainly don't think so, and have removed it. -
2865:
http://www.adb.online.anu.edu.au/biogs/A070179b.htm
2793:
http://www.adb.online.anu.edu.au/biogs/A160513b.htm
1992:. That is not what the statement I removed said. - 1667:Whatever the merits of the previous language, this 3659:" of the Preamble, it turns out, is not indexed. 3989:I am proposing a change in the article title for 2797:Some significant Australian IWW members include 1486:if anyone disagrees and wants to change that. - 989:Actually I do know who did it, the same person. 469:; and Juan Go'mez-Quin~ones & David Maciel, 2881:relevant reference for the IWW in Australia is 2752:Revision of the "Government repression" section 2558:IWW: Anarchosyndicalist or revolutionary union? 1095:http://www.iww.org/culture/myths/myths3.shtml#9 216:to prevent the mistake from cropping up again. 164:Industrial Workers of the World Internationally 1805:headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio - it simply 437:, but it is not transcribed to their website: 1377:Industrial Unionism — THE HOPE OF THE WORKERS 1069:am leaving the page on your version for now. 8: 4020:Talk:Industrial_Workers_of_the_World_tactics 3786:Also last sentence is extraneous. also POV. 2847:http://www.takver.com/history/hooton_iww.htm 1654:I removed this "notorious" POV once again. 439:http://www.internationalist.org/int2toc.html 4083:There's a case to be made for inclusion of 4043:I'm wondering why the SEE ALSO section has 3853:'s socialist army in Baja California. (see 2673:The discussion page is a perfect place for 1339:THE I.W.W. — WHAT IT IS, AND WHAT IT IS NOT 768:is just a stub with this same information. 700:Talk:Edward_R._Murrow#Wobblie_connection.3F 212:". We should probably continue monitoring 3915:) 03:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC) miasnikov 3388:Talk:An injury to one is an injury to all 2851:http://www.takver.com/history/iwwinoz.htm 2582:There might be several reasons for this: 2481:The article is too long and lacks focus. 1358:Industrial Unionism — THE ROAD TO FREEDOM 1317:Historical Catechism of American Unionism 278:That is another theory, there are many. 3561:The recent commentary from an IP address 2168:bequeathed to the union when they died. 1006:About these changes and their reversion 4148: 3995:Industrial Workers of the World tactics 3991:Industrial Workers of the World tactics 3454:My three cents: 1) I think the article 2853:Both archived on Takver's helpful page 1963:. Some of the biggest ones, like the " 3723:it might be fun to try and write up a 2102:Approximate number of current members 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2982:http://www.iww.org/en/join/dues.shtml 7: 3845:Socialism and the Mexican revolution 3351:An injury to one is an injury to all 3232:An injury to one is an injury to all 3213:The following discussion is closed. 1961:initiated by the IWW labor movement' 1624:simply because it was very similar. 1410:consistent description, and that is 1227:. Yes, you'll find one reference to 412:Congress of Industrial Organizations 408:Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers Union 18:Talk:Industrial Workers of the World 3857:, and related battles artticles.)-- 3627:existing employer/employee compact. 1935:I have removed the statement about 911:It would be inappropriate to place 3743:Neutrality of 'Repression' Section 2083:agree, and I've never been to the 1195:of the IWW's political philosophy. 371:19:53 PM Pacific DST, 24 Apr 2005 210:International Workers of the World 185:International Workers of the World 179:International Workers of the World 24: 3813:in on one side or the other over 3742: 1397:revolutionary industrial unionism 1193:not the most accurate description 3547:The discussion above is closed. 2885:by Frank Cain, Melbourne (1993) 595:much greater usage of references 591:tagged POV for a year and a half 29: 3355:Industrial Workers of the World 3230:I'm proposing a merger between 1231:, and a few more references to 932:the purposes herein expressed. 926:Political Alliances Prohibited 341:18:42 Pacific DST, 24 Apr 2005 4087:, but not its 1973 successor. 3775:, IWW member and army veteran 3423:Okay. I just created this and 3024:12:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 2999:http://www.iww.org/en/branches 2971:18:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2960:10:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2912:22:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2836:) 06:48, August 20, 2007 (UTC) 2763:I have removed this sentence: 2092:04:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 2078:17:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 2059:16:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 2001:03:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 1976:17:37, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 1925:06:10, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 1759:03:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 1738:17:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 878:Near the bottom of the secion 824:tag to call attention to it.-- 543:01:47, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 326:) 05:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 296:) 05:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 126:This article says the IWW has 1: 3980:01:33, 10 December 2010 (UTC) 3895:07:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 3780:cause of death as "suicide." 3669:02:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 3647:03:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 3079:06:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 3063:00:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 3039:19:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 2820:Ian Alexander Hamilton Turner 2722:22:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 2639:04:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 2625:00:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 2570:22:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 2553:14:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 2510:05:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 2493:22:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 2429:08:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC) 2245:struggle for workers' rights. 2126:18:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 1690:20:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1676:21:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 1659:16:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 1581:19:34, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1519:11:03, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 1134:18:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 857:00:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 811:05:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 711:20:38, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 669:01:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 643:23:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 619:01:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 576:02:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 395:14:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 3940:06:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 3925:03:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 3838:22:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 3799:20:47, 10 October 2009 (UTC) 2470:02:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 2115:05:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2104:was dropped from 2000 to 900 2087:. Changed rating to "high" 1781:15:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1724:15:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1560:22:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 1544:21:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 1529:15:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1509:02:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 1084:15:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1035:13:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 953:19:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 892:07:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 839:15:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 829:01:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 784:04:12, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 747:19:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 557:15:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 508:15:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 404:Western Federation of Miners 174:18:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 146:15:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 113:15:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3867:00:09, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 3590:06:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 3574:04:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 2955:best wishes, Richard Myers 2897:15:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2872:03:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2858:02:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 2814:06:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2440:04:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 2027:18:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 1952:00:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 1499:06:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 664:Other suggestions welcome. 410:(links to WFM page) in the 4175: 4097:19:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 4085:Socialist Party of America 4079:15:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC) 4064:14:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC) 4034:06:04, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 3737:02:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 3683:01:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 3543:08:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 3526:19:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 3500:13:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC) 3473:19:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 3415:21:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 3400:21:17, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 3371:01:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 3353:should not be merged into 3341:01:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 3326:23:47, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 3311:23:29, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 3295:20:24, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 3277:20:23, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 3260:19:20, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 3166:08:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 3143:23:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1885:19:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1629:21:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1458:19:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1425:09:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1186:03:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1155:16:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1107:Socialist Party of America 1101:Good point. Also remember 1020:12:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 994:19:42, 10 March 2006 (UTC) 985:19:38, 10 March 2006 (UTC) 964:05:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC) 682:23:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 4142:19:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 4125:08:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 3900:Editorializing by cranks? 3750:The Land That Time Forgot 3718:02:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 3706:Ottawa Panhandlers' Union 3514:American Republican Party 3449:08:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 3204:01:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 3186:20:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC) 3171:The Lexington Avenue bomb 3120:15:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 3097:07:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 2778:02:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 2746:02:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 2694:06:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 2663:03:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 2532:09:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 2477:Improving the IWW article 2405:09:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 2375:17:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 2349:09:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 1914:17:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 1875:04:08, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 1859:01:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 1850:00:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 1443:21:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC) 1176:) 19:46, 15 December 2006 1123:08:51, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 1074:23:18, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 1064:22:57, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 921:ARTICLE IV (as per 2010) 902:17:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 818:specifically invalidating 802:December 7 - 13, 2005. - 532:10:19, 30 July 2005 (UTC) 497:02:53, 13 July 2005 (UTC) 446:23:40, 12 July 2005 (UTC) 418:18:03, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) 232:12:00, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) 169:of the GLAMROC somewhere. 158:00:55, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 96:03:06, 13 July 2005 (UTC) 3855:Second Battle of Tijuana 3549:Please do not modify it. 3512:isn't redirected to the 3216:Please do not modify it. 2736:20:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 2540:Woody Guthrie membership 1841:18:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1828:17:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1814:03:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC) 1713:15:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 1649:17:00, 12 May 2006 (UTC) 1610:17:51, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 1431:members in good standing 729:) 19:15, 6 November 2006 454:Bisbee Deportations 1917 362:02:12, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) 271:05:31, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) 252:17:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 205:19:52, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC) 191:14:21, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC) 137:17:04, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC) 3702:Starbucks Workers Union 3657:abolish the wage system 3250:I support this merger. 3152:Not much on Consription 2925:three dollars per month 2700:Jack London and the IWW 1971:-institgated disputes? 1448:This should be read as 976:I don't know, but anon 514:"Government repression" 3807:nominated for deletion 3237:attempted unilaterally 3105:Between the World Wars 2867:I will return to this. 1622:http://www.iww.org.au/ 1594:are up and working - 1337:In the 1928 pamphlet, 1326: 1253: 1071:The Ungovernable Force 1061:The Ungovernable Force 991:The Ungovernable Force 982:The Ungovernable Force 961:The Ungovernable Force 332:Mexican-American role? 4024:Thanks! best wishes, 3765:Centralia, Washington 2828:comment was added by 2689:(to me) in any case. 2522:comment was added by 2456:comment was added by 2395:comment was added by 1990:intitiated by the IWW 1571:after twelve months. 1469:comment was added by 1320: 1243: 1054:) 22:41, 1 April 2006 638:would be sufficient. 612:Government Repression 381:comment was added by 314:comment was added by 284:comment was added by 183:I created a redirect 42:of past discussions. 3851:Ricardo Flores Magon 3805:IWW union shop list 3755:Edgar Rice Burroughs 3695:Wobbly shop category 3566:The Wednesday Island 3431:isn't redirected to 3178:The Wednesday Island 2446:follow your leaders? 2417:Can someone clarify? 1891:Origin of "Wobblies" 1552:The Wednesday Island 757:Recently added "The 492:in those days. . - 4045:Socialist Party USA 3725:Peoples' Wherehouse 3384:User:MiltonP Ottawa 2675:personal experience 2608:end deleted section 1834:Ypsilanti, Michigan 1412:industrial unionism 1291:industrial unionism 1229:anarcho-syndicalism 1225:industrial unionism 1221:Industrial unionism 465:; James W. Byrkit, 4004:The article also: 3872:Membership numbers 3747:In his 1918 novel 3510:support our troops 3456:Support our troops 3429:support our troops 2577:anarchosyndicalism 2098:Current membership 2037:Connelly's Marxism 1937:Wheatland Hop Riot 1931:Wheatland Hop Riot 1481:) 3 November 2006. 1315:The 1923 pamphlet 1025:anarchosyndicalism 978:User: 82.35.70.213 907:Anarchism template 4115:comment added by 3841: 3824:comment added by 3556:Recent commentary 3202: 3145: 3133:comment added by 2876:I agree that the 2869:Jeremytrewindixon 2837: 2811:Jeremytrewindixon 2679:original research 2535: 2473: 2408: 2373: 2085:Logan Square SBUX 2068:Importance of IWW 2061: 2045:comment added by 1600:comment added by 1497: 1482: 1177: 1168:comment added by 1157: 1145:comment added by 1055: 1046:comment added by 943:Anarchism sidebar 936: 935: 745: 730: 721:comment added by 398: 327: 297: 155:Jeremytrewindixon 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4166: 4159: 4153: 4144: 4127: 4039:Socialist Party? 3859:$ 1LENCE D00600D 3840: 3818: 3437:Invasion of Iraq 3218: 3195: 3128: 2950:build the union. 2878:IWW in Australia 2823: 2659: 2656: 2621: 2618: 2517: 2506: 2503: 2451: 2390: 2366: 2170:I was astonished 2040: 2011:Connolly is dead 1612: 1490: 1464: 1402:overalls brigade 1319:states bluntly, 1163: 1140: 1041: 947: 941: 918: 917: 738: 716: 696:Edward R. Murrow 459:Internationalist 376: 309: 279: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4174: 4173: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4154: 4150: 4135: 4110: 4107: 4041: 3987: 3948: 3902: 3874: 3847: 3819: 3810: 3787: 3781: 3745: 3697: 3558: 3553: 3552: 3461:David C. Coates 3228: 3226:Merger proposal 3223: 3214: 3201: 3173: 3154: 3107: 3046: 3032: 2904: 2824:—The preceding 2785: 2754: 2729: 2727:Notable Members 2708:Clarice Stasz, 2702: 2657: 2654: 2619: 2616: 2560: 2542: 2518:—The preceding 2504: 2501: 2479: 2452:—The preceding 2448: 2419: 2391:—The preceding 2372: 2190:, had declared: 2100: 2070: 2013: 1933: 1911: 1908: 1905: 1902: 1893: 1795: 1702: 1636: 1618: 1595: 1496: 1465:—The preceding 1433: 1356:1913 pamphlet, 1059:source please. 1027: 1004: 945: 939: 909: 865: 791: 755: 744: 692: 529:J. Parker Stone 516: 456: 377:—The preceding 334: 310:—The preceding 280:—The preceding 260: 181: 166: 77: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4172: 4170: 4161: 4160: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4140:comment added 4106: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4040: 4037: 4018:Discussion at 4013: 4012: 4009: 3986: 3983: 3947: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3901: 3898: 3873: 3870: 3846: 3843: 3809: 3803: 3785: 3777:Wesley Everest 3762: 3744: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3696: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3593: 3592: 3557: 3554: 3546: 3503: 3502: 3488:I'm Against It 3476: 3475: 3441:MiltonP Ottawa 3418: 3417: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3333:MiltonP Ottawa 3303:MiltonP Ottawa 3299: 3298: 3297: 3280: 3279: 3269:MiltonP Ottawa 3262: 3227: 3224: 3222: 3221: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3197: 3172: 3169: 3158:122.106.146.69 3153: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3106: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3082: 3081: 3071:Transcona Slim 3045: 3042: 3031: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3016: 3015: 3011: 3010: 3002: 3001: 2995: 2994: 2990: 2989: 2985: 2984: 2978: 2977: 2963: 2962: 2952: 2951: 2946: 2945: 2941: 2940: 2935: 2934: 2929: 2928: 2920: 2919: 2903: 2900: 2784: 2781: 2771: 2770: 2753: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2728: 2725: 2714: 2713: 2701: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2636:Mr Christopher 2628: 2627: 2574: 2559: 2556: 2541: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2513: 2512: 2478: 2475: 2447: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2418: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2368: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2129: 2128: 2123:Mr Christopher 2099: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2030: 2029: 2012: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1965:Haymarket Riot 1932: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1909: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1892: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1877: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1847:67.168.216.176 1794: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1727: 1726: 1701: 1700:salvation army 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1669:Mr Christopher 1662: 1661: 1656:Mr Christopher 1646:Mr Christopher 1635: 1632: 1617: 1614: 1584: 1583: 1563: 1562: 1492: 1461: 1460: 1432: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1416: 1415: 1406: 1405: 1392: 1391: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1380: 1373:W.E. Trautmann 1371:The same year 1368: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1354:Joseph Ettor's 1349: 1348: 1343: 1342: 1334: 1333: 1328: 1327: 1325: 1324: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1286: 1285: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1217: 1216: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1197: 1196: 1159: 1158: 1147:208.68.244.251 1126: 1125: 1111:Daniel De Leon 1097:for instance. 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1032:Plebs' College 1026: 1023: 1003: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 967: 966: 938:I removed the 934: 933: 928: 927: 923: 922: 908: 905: 864: 861: 860: 859: 842: 841: 799:Seattle Weekly 790: 787: 754: 751: 750: 749: 740: 691: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 672: 671: 661: 660: 656: 655: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645:Joseph Lapp II 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578:Joseph Lapp II 562: 561: 560: 559: 546: 545: 515: 512: 511: 510: 455: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 400: 399: 364: 363: 333: 330: 329: 328: 301: 300: 299: 298: 273: 272: 259: 256: 255: 254: 200: 199: 180: 177: 171:Transcona Slim 165: 162: 161: 160: 149: 148: 120: 119: 118: 117: 116: 115: 101: 100: 99: 98: 76: 73: 70: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4171: 4158: 4152: 4149: 4143: 4139: 4134: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4126: 4122: 4118: 4117:76.105.44.169 4114: 4104: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4056:Richard Myers 4053: 4048: 4046: 4038: 4036: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4026:Richard Myers 4022: 4021: 4016: 4010: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4002: 4000: 3996: 3993:. Instead of 3992: 3984: 3982: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3946:IWW in the UK 3945: 3941: 3937: 3933: 3932:Richard Myers 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3899: 3897: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3887:SmashTheState 3884: 3880: 3871: 3869: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3844: 3842: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3826:SmashTheState 3823: 3816: 3808: 3804: 3802: 3801:StevIstKrieg 3800: 3796: 3792: 3784: 3778: 3774: 3770: 3766: 3761: 3758: 3756: 3752: 3751: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3710:SmashTheState 3707: 3703: 3694: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3675:FrFintonStack 3672: 3671: 3670: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3639:Richard Myers 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3606: 3602: 3601:surplus value 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3562: 3555: 3550: 3545: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3535:Richard Myers 3532: 3528: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3518:SmashTheState 3515: 3511: 3507: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3481: 3478: 3477: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3457: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3421: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3263: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3242: 3238: 3233: 3225: 3220: 3217: 3211: 3210: 3205: 3200: 3194: 3193:David Schaich 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3170: 3168: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3151: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3104: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3051: 3050:One Big Union 3043: 3041: 3040: 3037: 3029: 3025: 3022: 3021:Richard Myers 3019:best wishes, 3018: 3017: 3013: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3003: 3000: 2997: 2996: 2992: 2991: 2987: 2986: 2983: 2980: 2979: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2969: 2961: 2958: 2957:4.227.252.140 2954: 2953: 2948: 2947: 2943: 2942: 2937: 2936: 2931: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2921: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2910: 2901: 2899: 2898: 2895: 2891: 2888: 2884: 2879: 2874: 2873: 2870: 2866: 2860: 2859: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2838: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2821: 2816: 2815: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2795: 2794: 2790: 2782: 2780: 2779: 2776: 2775:Richard Myers 2769: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2761: 2758: 2751: 2747: 2744: 2743:Richard Myers 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2734: 2726: 2724: 2723: 2720: 2719:Richard Myers 2711: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2699: 2695: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2671: 2664: 2661: 2660: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2640: 2637: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2626: 2623: 2622: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2590: 2588: 2583: 2580: 2578: 2572: 2571: 2568: 2567:Richard Myers 2565: 2557: 2555: 2554: 2551: 2550:Richard Myers 2547: 2546:Woody Guthrie 2539: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2524:24.229.203.46 2521: 2515: 2514: 2511: 2508: 2507: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2491: 2490:Richard Myers 2486: 2482: 2476: 2474: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2445: 2441: 2438: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2430: 2427: 2423: 2416: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2397:24.229.203.46 2394: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2376: 2371: 2365: 2364:David Schaich 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2350: 2347: 2346:Richard Myers 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2189: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2175: 2171: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2157: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2127: 2124: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2097: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2076: 2067: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2038: 2035:according to 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2028: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2016: 2010: 2002: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1977: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1930: 1926: 1923: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1912: 1898: 1890: 1886: 1883: 1878: 1876: 1873: 1868: 1860: 1857: 1856:Bookandcoffee 1853: 1852: 1851: 1848: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1838:Bookandcoffee 1835: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1812: 1811:Bookandcoffee 1808: 1804: 1800: 1792: 1782: 1779: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1760: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1739: 1736: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1722: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1708: 1699: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1674: 1673:Richard Myers 1670: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1641: 1640: 1633: 1631: 1630: 1627: 1626:Bookandcoffee 1623: 1615: 1613: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1593: 1589: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1531: 1530: 1527: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1511: 1510: 1507: 1506:Redflagflying 1501: 1500: 1495: 1489: 1488:David Schaich 1483: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1471:67.188.13.224 1468: 1459: 1456: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1441: 1440:67.161.93.159 1436: 1430: 1426: 1423: 1422:Richard Myers 1418: 1417: 1413: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1322: 1321: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1239: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1184: 1178: 1175: 1171: 1170:69.140.21.150 1167: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1124: 1121: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1096: 1085: 1082: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1037: 1036: 1033: 1024: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1001: 995: 992: 988: 987: 986: 983: 979: 975: 974: 973: 972: 965: 962: 957: 956: 955: 954: 951: 950:Bookandcoffee 944: 930: 929: 925: 924: 920: 919: 916: 914: 906: 904: 903: 900: 894: 893: 890: 886: 881: 876: 874: 869: 862: 858: 855: 851: 847: 844: 843: 840: 837: 833: 832: 831: 830: 827: 823: 819: 813: 812: 809: 805: 801: 800: 796: 788: 786: 785: 782: 778: 773: 770: 767: 763: 760: 752: 748: 743: 737: 736:David Schaich 733: 732: 731: 728: 724: 720: 713: 712: 709: 705: 701: 697: 689: 683: 680: 676: 675: 674: 673: 670: 667: 666:Richard Myers 663: 662: 658: 657: 653: 652: 644: 641: 637: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 620: 617: 616:Richard Myers 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 596: 592: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 577: 574: 571: 566: 565: 564: 563: 558: 555: 550: 549: 548: 547: 544: 541: 536: 535: 534: 533: 530: 526: 522: 513: 509: 506: 501: 500: 499: 498: 495: 491: 485: 483: 478: 474: 472: 468: 464: 460: 453: 447: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 417: 416:DJ Silverfish 413: 409: 405: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 374: 373: 372: 370: 361: 360: 356: 354: 350: 344: 343: 342: 340: 331: 325: 321: 317: 316:71.198.101.22 313: 307: 306: 305: 295: 291: 287: 286:71.198.101.22 283: 277: 276: 275: 274: 270: 266: 265: 264: 258:Wobbly source 257: 253: 250: 246: 242: 239: 238: 237: 233: 231: 230: 226: 224: 220: 215: 211: 206: 204: 198: 194: 193: 192: 190: 186: 178: 176: 175: 172: 163: 159: 156: 151: 150: 147: 144: 140: 139: 138: 136: 133: 129: 124: 114: 111: 107: 106: 105: 104: 103: 102: 97: 94: 89: 85: 84: 83: 82: 81: 74: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4151: 4133:User:soco_79 4111:— Preceding 4108: 4051: 4049: 4044: 4042: 4023: 4017: 4014: 4003: 3998: 3997:, i propose 3994: 3988: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3949: 3907: 3903: 3882: 3878: 3875: 3848: 3811: 3791:StevIstKrieg 3788: 3782: 3759: 3748: 3746: 3698: 3656: 3652: 3605:Bill Haywood 3559: 3548: 3530: 3529: 3505: 3504: 3482:- or at the 3479: 3422: 3419: 3381: 3346: 3264: 3247: 3229: 3215: 3212: 3174: 3155: 3108: 3055:Father Inire 3047: 3033: 3007:job delegate 3006: 2964: 2924: 2905: 2882: 2875: 2861: 2855:203.87.64.23 2843:Harry Hooton 2839: 2830:203.87.64.23 2817: 2807:Harry Hooton 2799:Monty Miller 2796: 2786: 2772: 2767: 2762: 2759: 2755: 2733:Jacob Haller 2730: 2715: 2703: 2652: 2614: 2607: 2606: 2603: 2600: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2587:Taft-Hartley 2584: 2581: 2573: 2562: 2561: 2543: 2499: 2487: 2483: 2480: 2449: 2437:205.201.4.33 2424: 2420: 2305:they pay up. 2173: 2169: 2155: 2101: 2071: 2036: 2017: 2014: 1989: 1968: 1960: 1934: 1894: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1796: 1710:Duke Aldhein 1703: 1668: 1642: 1638: 1637: 1619: 1602:24.148.39.81 1591: 1587: 1585: 1564: 1532: 1522: 1516:205.201.4.12 1512: 1502: 1484: 1462: 1449: 1437: 1434: 1411: 1396: 1376: 1357: 1338: 1316: 1295:Bill Haywood 1290: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1201: 1192: 1179: 1160: 1127: 1115:Bill Haywood 1092: 1048:82.35.70.213 1038: 1028: 1005: 968: 937: 912: 910: 895: 877: 875:18 Jan 2006 870: 866: 821: 817: 814: 797: 792: 756: 723:70.16.152.16 714: 693: 635: 611: 594: 590: 517: 489: 486: 481: 479: 475: 470: 466: 462: 458: 457: 434: 430: 426: 401: 365: 358: 352: 348: 335: 302: 261: 234: 228: 222: 218: 207: 201: 182: 167: 131: 127: 125: 121: 87: 78: 60: 43: 37: 4136:—Preceding 4052:more recent 4047:included? 3820:—Preceding 3769:November 11 3486:once said, 3433:nationalism 3135:84.57.60.91 3129:—Preceding 2789:Ian Turner 2710:Jack London 2431:Iggy_River 2275:principles. 2174:to a union? 2041:—Preceding 1897:Carabinieri 1596:—Preceding 1303:Eugene Debs 1233:syndicalism 1164:—Preceding 1141:—Preceding 1103:Eugene Debs 1042:—Preceding 717:—Preceding 679:Joseph_Lapp 573:Joseph_Lapp 135:Saul Taylor 36:This is an 3044:OBU/Canada 2890:0867863390 2803:Pat Mackie 2458:Librarimin 2426:Iggy river 1634:notorious? 1536:LeilaniLad 1002:US English 789:References 694:I removed 203:Voyager640 4071:Carptrash 3972:Amcharles 3917:Miasnikov 3909:Miasnikov 3729:Carptrash 3661:Carptrash 3492:Carptrash 2783:Australia 2691:Carptrash 2687:semantics 2089:Billbrock 2024:Blockader 1882:Jhfurnish 1803:currently 1202:inclusive 1183:Jhfurnish 826:Kadin2048 369:disbomber 339:disbomber 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 4113:unsigned 4105:Members? 3834:contribs 3822:unsigned 3465:Marnanel 3392:Marnanel 3386:said on 3241:reverted 3239:and was 3131:unsigned 3030:Officers 2933:workers. 2902:IWW Shop 2826:unsigned 2520:unsigned 2466:contribs 2454:unsigned 2393:unsigned 2235:capital. 2055:contribs 2043:unsigned 1598:unsigned 1588:BlackCat 1479:contribs 1467:unsigned 1455:Piercetp 1299:Ed Boyce 1166:unsigned 1143:unsigned 1120:Piercetp 1044:unsigned 899:Piercetp 880:Founding 873:Trenidor 863:Wobblies 766:Hop Riot 759:Hop Riot 753:Hop Riot 734:Added. - 719:unsigned 640:Toeboy83 523:and the 482:NY Times 391:contribs 379:unsigned 355:ubversiv 324:contribs 312:unsigned 294:contribs 282:unsigned 225:ubversiv 4138:undated 4089:Carrite 3655:" The " 3582:Zazaban 3484:Ramones 3425:someone 3407:Protonk 3363:Protonk 3318:Protonk 3287:Protonk 3252:Protonk 3248:Support 3112:Nyttend 3089:Tsiatko 2818:That's 2683:opinion 2585:1- The 2544:On the 2075:Rlquall 1973:Rlquall 1922:Bobanny 1735:Rlquall 1592:RedCard 1573:Zazaban 1450:current 1015:Mattley 540:Bobanny 494:Tribune 443:Tribune 427:Citizen 93:Tribune 88:current 39:archive 3883:member 3879:member 3603:(what 3531:OPPOSE 3506:OPPOSE 3480:OPPOSE 3359:WP:OSE 3347:repeat 3265:Oppose 2968:BURNyA 2909:BURNyA 2894:Takver 2863:entry: 2658:t Noir 2655:Vert e 2620:t Noir 2617:Vert e 2564:it...) 2505:t Noir 2502:Vert e 2108:Jmabel 2047:P89trd 1994:Jmabel 1945:Jmabel 1872:Qball6 1821:Jmabel 1799:famous 1778:Davert 1752:Jmabel 1721:Davert 1682:Kelt65 1526:Davert 1131:Kelt65 1081:Davert 971:Konulu 897:stuck. 885:Jmabel 850:Jmabel 836:Davert 804:Jmabel 777:Jmabel 704:Jmabel 690:Murrow 554:Davert 505:Davert 383:Davert 351:adical 245:Jmabel 221:adical 143:Davert 110:Davert 4155:See: 3331:bias. 3036:evrik 2188:FOTLU 2156:other 1870:is.-- 1793:Intro 1011:union 702:. -- 490:fluid 269:An An 189:Mulad 75:Style 16:< 4121:talk 4093:talk 4075:talk 4060:talk 4030:talk 3976:talk 3936:talk 3921:talk 3913:talk 3891:talk 3863:talk 3830:talk 3815:here 3795:talk 3773:1919 3733:talk 3714:talk 3704:and 3679:talk 3665:talk 3643:talk 3586:talk 3570:talk 3539:talk 3522:talk 3496:talk 3469:talk 3445:talk 3411:talk 3396:talk 3382:Oh, 3367:talk 3337:talk 3322:talk 3307:talk 3291:talk 3273:talk 3256:talk 3199:Cont 3182:talk 3162:talk 3139:talk 3116:talk 3093:talk 3075:talk 3059:talk 2887:ISBN 2834:talk 2528:talk 2462:talk 2401:talk 2370:Cont 2112:Talk 2051:talk 1998:Talk 1949:Talk 1825:Talk 1756:Talk 1686:talk 1616:logo 1606:talk 1590:and 1577:talk 1556:talk 1540:talk 1494:Cont 1475:talk 1395:The 1301:and 1174:talk 1151:talk 1052:talk 889:Talk 854:Talk 848:. - 822:cite 808:Talk 781:Talk 771:and 742:Cont 727:talk 708:Talk 488:uh, 387:talk 320:talk 290:talk 249:Talk 3817:. 3767:on 3763:In 3490:. 3435:or 3243:. 1969:IWW 1352:In 913:any 525:CIO 521:AFL 431:not 241:IWW 4123:) 4095:) 4077:) 4062:) 4032:) 3978:) 3938:) 3923:) 3893:) 3865:) 3836:) 3832:• 3797:) 3771:, 3753:, 3735:) 3716:) 3681:) 3667:) 3645:) 3588:) 3572:) 3541:) 3524:) 3498:) 3471:) 3447:) 3413:) 3398:) 3369:) 3361:? 3339:) 3324:) 3309:) 3293:) 3275:) 3258:) 3184:) 3164:) 3141:) 3118:) 3095:) 3077:) 3061:) 2892:-- 2681:, 2677:, 2530:) 2468:) 2464:• 2403:) 2110:| 2057:) 2053:• 1996:| 1947:| 1823:| 1807:is 1754:| 1688:) 1608:) 1579:) 1558:) 1542:) 1477:• 1438:-- 1223:, 1153:) 1109:. 946:}} 940:{{ 887:| 852:| 806:| 779:| 706:| 473:. 441:- 393:) 389:• 322:• 292:• 247:| 4119:( 4091:( 4073:( 4058:( 4028:( 3974:( 3934:( 3919:( 3911:( 3889:( 3861:( 3828:( 3793:( 3731:( 3712:( 3677:( 3663:( 3641:( 3584:( 3568:( 3537:( 3520:( 3494:( 3467:( 3443:( 3409:( 3394:( 3365:( 3335:( 3320:( 3305:( 3289:( 3271:( 3254:( 3196:/ 3180:( 3160:( 3137:( 3114:( 3091:( 3073:( 3057:( 3053:- 2832:( 2534:. 2526:( 2472:. 2460:( 2407:. 2399:( 2367:/ 2049:( 1910:k 1907:l 1904:a 1901:T 1684:( 1604:( 1575:( 1554:( 1538:( 1491:/ 1473:( 1390:] 1379:. 1366:] 1347:] 1332:] 1305:. 1284:] 1268:] 1257:] 1235:. 1215:] 1172:( 1149:( 1050:( 871:- 739:/ 725:( 397:. 385:( 359:E 353:S 349:R 318:( 288:( 229:E 223:S 219:R 50:.

Index

Talk:Industrial Workers of the World
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Tribune
03:06, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
Davert
15:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Saul Taylor
Davert
15:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Jeremytrewindixon
00:55, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Transcona Slim
18:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
International Workers of the World
Mulad
http://www.iww.org/en/culture/myths/international.shtml
Voyager640
International Workers of the World
Special:Whatlinkshere/International Workers of the World
RadicalSubversiv
E
IWW
Jmabel
Talk
17:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
An An
unsigned

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑