1205:, handling experiential marketing, brand partnerships, digital activation, and content creation.". This is a laundry list of corporate connections filled with business jargon; it is written like a press release. My initial removal noted that it was "spammy and unsourced" (which I stand by). It was then reinserted, with an edit summary giving the grounds "This list of brands comes from the Billboard article sourced in the introduction paragraph", but no footnote was added from that article, and even if it were, it would not solve the problem with the content itself. I removed it again, saying more specifically that it flatly failed
618:, who unquestionably released albums on the label, and which no one would have trouble verifying). Now, a prose section would get cluttered if you put them all in, because there are a couple dozen; that's why a list is useful. You ask why sourced information was removed while the list of artists was not. I removed the sourced information you refer to (which was not related to the list of artists) because it failed Knowledge's content guidelines for other reasons besides sourcing - chiefly because of
245:
even remotely controversial about this band's being on this label; I can't imagine why a raft of references would be needed for something so banal. There is nothing non-notable about the list of bands - notability applies to articles, not to content - and in any case, a roster of artists is about the most germane information anybody could provide about a label. I think the artist list demonstrates that the label satisfies the line in
1068:
119:
101:
1293:
studio" which is a little more understandable in my opinion, maybe following with 'for in-house music video production', possibly noting that
Robertson was directing music videos when she founded the company. If you're going to use 'creative studio' it might be best to explain to the reader what that means: music videos, stage design, and other creative direction/support/branding for artists.
74:
32:
187:
366:– Iamsound is a company whose function extends far beyond that of a record label. Aside from the music industry, the company operates as a marketing agency as well as a representation division for visual artists. To create consistency with other referential platforms, I am requesting that the word 'Records' be omitted from the page name.
998:, if you are being paid to edit this page, you must notify Knowledge who your client is (not merely that you are paid to edit - you must state who is paying you to edit) in one of three places: your user page, on this talk page, or in an edit summary. I have not found any declaration of yours in the edit summaries or on your userpage.
1103:) which allow for removal in the absence of discussion. I'll note that template instructions themselves are neither policies nor guidelines, so I feel there's a good case to follow the spirit of policy on this. Furthermore, if you go down a little further in the usage instructions, it is clearly stated:
1259:
your interpretation of the
Knowledge stance? I don't see how the brand list itself is considered promotion, when it's a reflection of the businesses activities. Similarly, "creative studio," is how the company defines the department and I don't see how a department of a company is promotional in nature?
1219:
sourced, as the edit summary claims (but again, I would argue for its removal even if a footnote were added). I'll start with this phrase, because it is illustrative of the general promotional tone of the article at its current juncture (not all of which, I believe, is attributable to the most recent
1162:
I am thankful to have cleared that up. I began my discussions on this page with the artist list, because I thought it would be the easiest of the several problems to resolve (since it involves neutral and non-promotional content), but that is proving not to be the case, so perhaps I will move on in a
1090:
I find this really odd. While it would be best practices for the tag placer to start a discussion, I rather put the onus on the person removing the tag, that they should either deal with the issue, start a discussion to gain consensus on removal, or possibly replace the tag with a more specific tag.
558:
Some of the artists in the list were moved to the appropriate sections (separated by visual and music). Similarly, I don't understand why information which was directly sourced from external publications was removed, while the list of artists (which I can't find sourced anywhere) remains. How else do
1297:
is better for tone, but I'm still not sure if it belongs, and what follows seems like industry buzzwords and should probably be presented more plainly. We're writing for a general audience. I agree with
Chubbles, stating what they do is more important and informative than stating who they are doing
691:
That table of album releases from the company seems most factual and relevant to its business operations. I also looked above and saw you've been involved in the development of this
Knowledge entry since 2013. In no way did I mean to diminish the work already done, but am really trying to bring more
658:
I accept that the label has expanded to other operations; I'm no longer contesting the removal of the "records" from the article title, for instance. Again, I'm fine splitting out into sections the artist list into record label and visual subsections if you like. None of that contravenes the changes
1258:
wasn't behind a paywall - but it does list the brands Top Shop, Soylent, Pitchfork, Adult Swim, Spotify, and Vans in the third paragraph. This list is followed by the word "like" (in the
Billboard article). Would the sentence, "They've also worked with Top Shop, Soylent, Adult Swim, and Vans," meet
1025:
Cement Media Inc did get paid by IAMSOUND to handle edits for the article, and I've found a way to disclose that on my page. The format style
Knowledge provides didn't appear to work for accurately representing this relationship. I also made autonomous edits, using my understanding of the Knowledge
383:
I'm inclined to vote nay, simply because the above is almost inscrutable ad copy (what constitute "other referential platforms"?). Knowledge is not part of
Iamsound Records' business solution. That said, if independent news outlets have covered other aspects of the label's business, the information
542:
basic of tasks we have to provide to our readers about a record label. I have no problem whatsoever if we want to change the structure of the list so that current and former artists are separated, or if sections need to be split out for musical and visual artists. But I simply don't understand the
1239:
should be removed or greatly reworked. It's unsourced, it's promotional name-dropping without a purpose, and the "like" makes it ambiguous and encyclopedically meaningless. Are they brands 'similar to' those named, or are they brands 'including' those named? The article could benefit from copy
244:
was reverted for putatively being unsourced and for the band's being non-notable. You may note that I have written an article for this band establishing its notability; furthermore, the label's own website, which is footnoted on the page, lists the band on its roster. Beyond this, there's nothing
1292:
Added the archive url for that source. Unless using a direct quotation, be careful about using the same wording as the source which can represent a copyright violation. We should generally paraphrase and summarize the sources. The fourth paragraph of the source describes it as a "visual art
537:
There are multiple problems with the recent spate of edits, but I'll start with this one. The artist list has been removed several times on the basis that it no longer accurately reflects what the company does. But this is not a promotional press piece for the label's 2021 activities; it is an
1277:
and they don't tell us anything of enduring value (unless and until some journalist or scholar makes the case that they are reflective of some important point about how or why people did business the way they did in this era, which I don't get from that
Billboard piece). "Creative studio" is
668:
I don't in principle object to the artist list being expanded into a table with each album release being listed, but it's not work I plan to do myself. But if we provided neither an artist list nor an album discography, the article would be missing essential encyclopedic information.
538:
encyclopedia article, whose job is to explain the organization's history in addition to its current status. One of the principal things a label's encyclopedia article should do is inform the reader of what musical artists have released albums on that label - it's perhaps the
716:
I do see your point with showing a comprehensive list, and maybe for now, it doesn't have to be a full table (to save time), but a bulleted list of "Releases" with Album Name, Artist Name, and Year? Also, I wasn't aware of the album itself being a source
622:
concerns. The list of artists is neutral and uncontroversial content; if there's some dispute over the signing status of an artist or band, then a citation may be needed, but in most cases, when a label puts out a record by a band, it's so easy to
1188:
The following was added (and aggressively reinserted after I removed it for being promotional in nature) in the recent activity on this article, and remains in the article as of this writing: the phrase "Additionally, they work with brands like
648:
want to indicate that I take it seriously if you believe we have erroneous entries to the list - then I will absolutely look for sources for that artist on your behalf. But the blanket removal of the list, multiple times, is not a good solution
1214:
is not the issue. If it is presented in a non-neutral way, it fails our content guidelines, and a list of big-name clients that liaise with the label to do branding and marketing is not proper content for an encyclopedia article. Plus, it is
1209:
bullet 5. It was then reinserted again, with the statement "I'm not sure how this is promotional if it's factually true, and written in a matter of fact manner, plus it's sourced." Promotional tone is about rhetoric, not truth; truth
609:
Ok, you say that some of the artists were moved to the appropriate sections, by which I take it you mean the prose sections labeled "record label" and "creative & marketing studio". But not nearly all of them were (for example,
1087:
if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article. If you do not start a discussion, any editor will be justified in removing the tag without
643:
rather than fostering genuine improvement of the articles. Can you tell me if there is a specific band on the list you believe was added in error? If there's some genuine concern that the list is not factually correct - and I
249:
about independent labels which have a significant roster of notable artists. I'll see if I can't do some improvement work, but it looks to me like there was a little surgery with a sledgehammer done here over the past day.
1317:
Morning all. I simplified that phrase taking the puffery and jargon out. Appreciate you may between you wish to revert, but it is perhaps a better starting point for something encyclopedic. With respect to all,
1030:, since they are externally verified by sources other than the company's own. I was getting the sense that it was becoming a "me vs. you" discussion, and still think a 3O editor is necessary for clearing up the
1143:
FYI, I went back at the COI template instruction's talk page archives, and it seems that wording was the result of an RfC following a protracted edit-war of the template instructions involving a paid editor.
278:
Alphabetized artist list and added a couple of news articles, hopefully that's a good start. The Lord Huron article's back up and needs admin review for the A7, shouldn't be a problem. I'll keep looking...
747:
has an undeclared COI. This rather torpedoes the chance of a helpful 3O so I deleted it. Please resolve that question first; then resubmit a clear question for a 3O if wished. With all good wishes,
1486:
575:
Also, it should be added that IAMSOUND as an entity doesn't appear to be strictly a label, and so the revisions were made to reflect that aspect as well (while acknowledging it began as label)
1240:
edit for peacock language, but content should be sourced and stabilized first. I'm not sure what is meant earlier by "creative studio". Is there such a thing as a non-creative studio? –
1339:
While I understand the company's own website isn't enough of a reference (as a standalone), it's still useful when combined with external sources for accurately representing activities.
1273:
I have access to the full article through
Outline, and I can see it mentions these brands. But why are they being mentioned here in an encyclopedia article? Marketing partnerships are
1278:
meaningless company jargon - we should avoid it and instead report what types of creation are going on (music making, filming, art installation designing, or what have you).
1476:
159:
1356:
1077:
Short answer: an editor with a declared COI for an article should never remove a COI tag on that article. Long answer: While the usage instructions for template
479:
475:
461:
326:
165:
1481:
1394:
1471:
1255:
797:
is (I think quite properly) disengaging, but has renewed the 3O request. IVO the history and the COI I have removed the renewed request for a 3O.
135:
1123:
1388:
221:
842:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
311:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
980:. Jacobmcpherson then removed the COI tag. I would like to ask: Jacobmcpherson, are you being paid to edit the Iamsound Knowledge page?
126:
106:
1357:
https://d21buns5ku92am.cloudfront.net/17491/pdf/campaigns/191994-20200929130006000000000-wetransfer-pro-partners-with-wales-bonner.pdf
348:
457:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
367:
1034:
concerns and "Artist list" conversation. I will also add that the page had a lot of inaccuracies before I made edits, including:
793:
then asked for a 3O. I removed the request because of the suggestion - which appears to be correct - of an undeclared COI. Now
264:
Alright, hang on, it looks like somebody knocked the Lord Huron article off while I was asleep...hang on while I get that back.
59:
639:
add such a battery, it wouldn't serve the reader very well; it's the kind of thing people tend to demand more to demonstrate
51:
43:
1332:
Thanks, and regarding the department naming / company activities discussion, these links weren’t included - but may help -
1048:
I'll also add that other editors have since cleaned up my additions, including correctly sourcing the content you viewed as
1091:
This would err on the side of caution given that COI could represent a policy violation. Although it is in line with the
559:
you propose representing this information as a historical reference than the list which may not even be factually correct?
963:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
895:. Seems like a pretty cut-and-dried case, as this is not an acronym and is capitalized merely as a corporate stylization.
595:, I think it makes more sense to depict the list as "Albums" (in chronological order) and not Artists. What do you think?
1111:(underlining added). So someone with a declared COI for the article should never remove the tag under any circumstances.
1412:
864:
522:
197:
81:
1220:
activity), and which I would like to copyedit, or at least add a {{tone}} tag to without encountering swift reversion.
224:) has been paid by Cement Media Inc. on behalf of IAMSOUND. Their editing has included contributions to this article.
854:
447:
1400:
1194:
200:
require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
1256:
https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/8461189/iamsound-niki-roberton-creative-directors-spotlight-interview/
833:
403:
302:
478:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1382:
1363:
1346:
1264:
1057:
914:
722:
697:
600:
580:
564:
215:
1044:
Company structure, I see that I wasn't alone in contesting this and conversations around this started in 2016.
1072:
513:
439:
225:
435:
373:
341:
1444:
843:
497:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
485:
413:
312:
205:
87:
1128:
as I have placed at the top of this page. This is a non-binding third opinion, but I hope it helps! –
972:
I placed a COI tag on this page because edits recently added by the user
Jacobmcpherson appeared to be
438:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1323:
806:
782:
752:
369:
193:
1377:
1359:
1342:
1260:
1117:
1053:
1049:
1031:
1027:
1016:
910:
846:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
798:
794:
790:
789:
added material, which was removed, and subsequently had a discussion on here with another editor.
786:
744:
718:
693:
628:
596:
576:
560:
211:
134:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1303:
1283:
1245:
1225:
1168:
1149:
1133:
1003:
985:
977:
949:
932:
900:
674:
619:
548:
389:
284:
269:
255:
482:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
498:
331:
1432:
1098:
892:
860:
640:
431:
359:
505:
1319:
1274:
1206:
1181:
1067:
973:
802:
748:
246:
592:
995:
743:
Good morning fellow editors. Noted the 3O request, and also the suggestion below that
464:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
201:
1026:
framework. That being said, I'm failing to see how the contributions I made violates
504:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1465:
1299:
1279:
1241:
1221:
1164:
1145:
1129:
1092:
999:
981:
945:
928:
896:
670:
544:
385:
280:
265:
251:
131:
17:
1116:
I'll also note that this talk page and the talk pages of all the articles listed at
1080:
635:
a reliable source for the fact that the band has released on the label.) And if we
448:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080621233623/http://www.iamsoundrecords.com/artists
1163:
new section to discuss the content I believe is not neutral and is promotional.
869:
778:
624:
471:
31:
1198:
470:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
412:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
241:
118:
100:
451:
1190:
888:
884:
363:
611:
1120:
which have been directly edited by that user should have the template
1336:
615:
1202:
324:. The pseudo-oppose comment remained uncountered after 11 days.
1457:
1367:
1350:
1327:
1307:
1287:
1268:
1249:
1229:
1172:
1153:
1137:
1061:
1007:
989:
953:
936:
918:
904:
875:
810:
756:
726:
701:
678:
604:
584:
568:
552:
527:
393:
377:
353:
288:
273:
259:
1095:
practice, I'm not aware of any other policy-level tags (e.g.:
181:
67:
26:
1333:
976:
and because Jacobmcpherson's user page indicates that he is
58:
here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or
30:
442:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
627:
that we don't typically need a battery of citations (see
1019:
and also asked for a 3O on the "Artist list" discussion.
384:
they report may lend some credence to the move request.
1424:
1418:
1406:
55:
1254:
When this article was written, the Billboard source -
543:
insistence that it be dynamited entirely. What gives?
1038:
Company formation year, it started in 2007, not 2006.
692:
accuracy to the organisation's activities as a whole
593:
https://www.discogs.com/label/126854-IAmSound-Records
402:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
204:. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
130:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1487:
Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
1041:
The original article had dead links in the sources.
474:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
315:. No further edits should be made to this section.
80:This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge's
1235:I agree that the one-sentence paragraph beginning
416:. No further edits should be made to this section.
164:This article has not yet received a rating on the
801:has disengaged so there is nothing to mediate.
1423:has declared paid contributions to the article
320:The result of the move request was: Marking as
1275:generally promotional in content by definition
460:This message was posted before February 2018.
777:Ahem; I have removed the renewed 3O request.
8:
1052:. I hope this clears everything up for you.
659:I made and that you reverted more than once.
631:). (I mean, the album, as a published work,
851:The result of the move request was: Moved
832:The following is a closed discussion of a
430:I have just modified one external link on
301:The following is a closed discussion of a
95:
73:
71:
1477:Unknown-importance record labels articles
1237:Additionally, they work with brands like
1355:Also, this link mentions the company -
1105:This tag may be removed by editors who
452:http://www.iamsoundrecords.com/artists/
97:
40:Individuals with a conflict of interest
1294:
1236:
1104:
1086:
56:request corrections or suggest content
50:not to directly edit the article. See
7:
124:This article is within the scope of
994:Please note that, per the terms at
144:Knowledge:WikiProject Record Labels
86:It is of interest to the following
1482:WikiProject Record Labels articles
1107:do not have a conflict of interest
147:Template:WikiProject Record Labels
25:
1472:Unassessed record labels articles
434:. Please take a moment to review
1066:
959:The discussion above is closed.
185:
117:
99:
72:
46:the subject of the article, are
1337:https://www.iamsound.com/studio
825:Requested move 21 February 2021
785:, but that policy is relevant.
641:hidebound devotion to the rules
52:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
1:
1368:10:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
1351:10:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
1328:09:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
1308:20:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
1288:19:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
1269:15:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
1250:13:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
1230:02:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
1173:02:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
1154:15:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
1138:15:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
1109:after the problem is resolved
1062:11:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
1008:14:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
990:13:56, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
954:13:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
937:06:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
919:14:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
905:13:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
876:16:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
811:22:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
757:09:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
727:15:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
702:15:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
679:13:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
605:13:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
585:14:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
569:14:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
553:13:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
528:21:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
138:and see a list of open tasks.
1124:Connected contributor (paid)
294:Requested move 1 August 2016
1458:23:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
354:21:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
289:21:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
274:20:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
260:20:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
1503:
781:applies - not the same as
491:(last update: 5 June 2024)
427:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
394:10:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
378:20:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
166:project's importance scale
1334:https://iamsound.zora.co/
163:
127:WikiProject Record Labels
112:
94:
961:Please do not modify it.
839:Please do not modify it.
409:Please do not modify it.
308:Please do not modify it.
423:External links modified
62:if the issue is urgent.
150:record labels articles
35:
1373:COI tag (August 2022)
974:promotional in nature
42:, particularly those
34:
18:Talk:Iamsound Records
1015:Hello, I decided to
591:Using this source -
472:regular verification
322:no consensus to move
194:Wikimedia Foundation
1295:They've also worked
1118:User:Jacobmcpherson
462:After February 2018
327:(non-admin closure)
516:InternetArchiveBot
467:InternetArchiveBot
82:content assessment
36:
909:This makes sense
858:
855:non-admin closure
492:
329:
233:
232:
180:
179:
176:
175:
172:
171:
66:
65:
16:(Redirected from
1494:
1455:
1449:
1443:
1437:
1431:
1422:
1395:deleted contribs
1127:
1102:
1084:
1070:
872:
852:
841:
526:
517:
490:
489:
468:
432:Iamsound Records
411:
360:Iamsound Records
352:
344:
325:
310:
189:
188:
182:
152:
151:
148:
145:
142:
121:
114:
113:
103:
96:
77:
76:
75:
68:
48:strongly advised
27:
21:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1462:
1461:
1451:
1445:
1439:
1433:
1428:
1380:
1375:
1353:
1186:
1121:
1096:
1078:
970:
968:COI tag removed
965:
964:
870:
837:
827:
535:
520:
515:
483:
476:have permission
466:
440:this simple FaQ
425:
420:
407:
342:
338:
306:
296:
240:My addition of
238:
186:
149:
146:
143:
140:
139:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1500:
1498:
1490:
1489:
1484:
1479:
1474:
1464:
1463:
1378:Jacobmcpherson
1374:
1371:
1360:Jacobmcpherson
1343:Jacobmcpherson
1341:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1290:
1261:Jacobmcpherson
1185:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1157:
1156:
1054:Jacobmcpherson
1046:
1045:
1042:
1039:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
969:
966:
958:
957:
956:
939:
911:Jacobmcpherson
881:
879:
849:
848:
834:requested move
828:
826:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
799:Jacobmcpherson
795:Jacobmcpherson
791:Jacobmcpherson
787:Jacobmcpherson
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
745:Jacobmcpherson
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
719:Jacobmcpherson
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
694:Jacobmcpherson
684:
683:
682:
681:
663:
662:
661:
660:
653:
652:
651:
650:
597:Jacobmcpherson
588:
587:
577:Jacobmcpherson
572:
571:
561:Jacobmcpherson
534:
531:
510:
509:
502:
455:
454:
446:Added archive
424:
421:
419:
418:
404:requested move
398:
397:
396:
357:
318:
317:
303:requested move
297:
295:
292:
237:
234:
231:
230:
229:
228:
212:Jacobmcpherson
206:WP:COIRESPONSE
190:
178:
177:
174:
173:
170:
169:
162:
156:
155:
153:
136:the discussion
122:
110:
109:
104:
92:
91:
85:
78:
64:
63:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1499:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1467:
1460:
1459:
1454:
1450:
1448:
1442:
1438:
1436:
1426:
1420:
1417:
1414:
1411:
1408:
1405:
1402:
1399:
1396:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1384:
1379:
1372:
1370:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1358:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1338:
1335:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1238:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1183:
1180:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1125:
1119:
1114:
1112:
1110:
1108:
1100:
1094:
1089:
1082:
1076:
1074:
1069:
1064:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1033:
1029:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
992:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
967:
962:
955:
951:
947:
943:
940:
938:
934:
930:
926:
923:
922:
921:
920:
916:
912:
907:
906:
902:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
878:
877:
874:
873:
866:
862:
856:
847:
845:
840:
835:
830:
829:
824:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
783:WP:CLEANHANDS
780:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
728:
724:
720:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
703:
699:
695:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
680:
676:
672:
667:
666:
665:
664:
657:
656:
655:
654:
647:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
621:
617:
613:
608:
607:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
589:
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:
570:
566:
562:
557:
556:
555:
554:
550:
546:
541:
532:
530:
529:
524:
519:
518:
507:
503:
500:
496:
495:
494:
487:
481:
477:
473:
469:
463:
458:
453:
449:
445:
444:
443:
441:
437:
433:
428:
422:
417:
415:
410:
405:
400:
399:
395:
391:
387:
382:
381:
380:
379:
375:
371:
368:
365:
361:
356:
355:
350:
347:
345:
337:
336:
335:
328:
323:
316:
314:
309:
304:
299:
298:
293:
291:
290:
286:
282:
276:
275:
271:
267:
262:
261:
257:
253:
248:
243:
235:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
210:
209:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
184:
183:
167:
161:
158:
157:
154:
141:Record Labels
137:
133:
132:record labels
129:
128:
123:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
107:Record Labels
105:
102:
98:
93:
89:
83:
79:
70:
69:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
38:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1452:
1446:
1440:
1434:
1415:
1409:
1403:
1397:
1391:
1385:
1376:
1354:
1331:
1316:
1216:
1211:
1187:
1115:
1113:
1106:
1071:
1065:
1050:WP:PROMOTION
1047:
1032:WP:PROMOTION
1028:WP:PROMOTION
1024:
1017:WP:DISENGAGE
993:
978:paid to edit
971:
960:
941:
924:
908:
883:
880:
868:
850:
838:
831:
645:
636:
632:
629:WP:SKYISBLUE
539:
536:
514:
511:
486:source check
465:
459:
456:
429:
426:
408:
401:
358:
340:
333:
332:
321:
319:
307:
300:
277:
263:
239:
236:Recent edits
218:
198:Terms of Use
125:
88:WikiProjects
47:
44:representing
39:
1435:Lil-unique1
844:move review
779:Clean hands
620:WP:NOTPROMO
533:Artist list
414:move review
313:move review
226:Declaration
1466:Categories
1413:block user
1407:filter log
1320:Springnuts
1298:it for. –
1199:Adult Swim
803:Springnuts
749:Springnuts
523:Report bug
370:Telefresco
242:Lord Huron
60:contact us
54:. You may
1419:block log
1075:Response:
944:per nom.
927:per nom.
893:WP:NCCAPS
633:is itself
506:this tool
499:this tool
1389:contribs
1300:Reidgreg
1280:Chubbles
1242:Reidgreg
1222:Chubbles
1207:WP:PROMO
1191:Top Shop
1182:WP:PROMO
1165:Chubbles
1146:Reidgreg
1130:Reidgreg
1088:warning.
1085:state:
1000:Chubbles
982:Chubbles
946:Reidgreg
929:Dicklyon
897:Chubbles
889:Iamsound
885:IAMSOUND
671:Chubbles
545:Chubbles
512:Cheers.—
386:Chubbles
364:Iamsound
281:Chubbles
266:Chubbles
252:Chubbles
247:WP:MUSIC
222:contribs
1195:Soylent
1184:concern
1099:Copyvio
996:WP:PAID
942:Support
925:Support
612:Io Echo
436:my edit
334:Andy W.
202:WP:PAID
1212:per se
1201:, and
1093:WP:BRD
891:– Per
871:buidhe
625:verify
84:scale.
1430:: -->
1429:: -->
649:here.
616:MS MR
1447:talk
1425:here
1401:logs
1383:talk
1364:talk
1347:talk
1324:talk
1304:talk
1284:talk
1265:talk
1246:talk
1226:talk
1203:Vans
1169:talk
1150:talk
1134:talk
1058:talk
1004:talk
986:talk
950:talk
933:talk
915:talk
901:talk
807:talk
753:talk
723:talk
698:talk
675:talk
614:and
601:talk
581:talk
565:talk
549:talk
540:most
390:talk
374:talk
343:talk
285:talk
270:talk
256:talk
216:talk
192:The
1217:not
1081:COI
637:did
480:RfC
450:to
406:.
349:ctb
208:.
196:'s
160:???
1468::
1456:—
1427:.
1366:)
1349:)
1326:)
1306:)
1286:)
1267:)
1248:)
1228:)
1197:,
1193:,
1171:)
1152:)
1144:–
1136:)
1126:}}
1122:{{
1101:}}
1097:{{
1083:}}
1079:{{
1073:3O
1060:)
1006:)
988:)
952:)
935:)
917:)
903:)
887:→
867:)
863:·
836:.
809:)
755:)
725:)
700:)
677:)
646:do
603:)
583:)
567:)
551:)
493:.
488:}}
484:{{
392:)
376:)
362:→
330:—
305:.
287:)
272:)
258:)
1453:)
1441:(
1421:)
1416:·
1410:·
1404:·
1398:·
1392:·
1386:·
1381:(
1362:(
1345:(
1322:(
1302:(
1282:(
1263:(
1244:(
1224:(
1167:(
1148:(
1132:(
1056:(
1002:(
984:(
948:(
931:(
913:(
899:(
865:c
861:t
859:(
857:)
853:(
805:(
751:(
721:(
696:(
673:(
599:(
579:(
563:(
547:(
525:)
521:(
508:.
501:.
388:(
372:(
351:)
346:·
339:(
283:(
268:(
254:(
219:·
214:(
168:.
90::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
