Knowledge

Talk:Ishirō Honda

Source 📝

31: 205: 178: 837:. Andrzejbanas reverted it to the previous/current edit because they felt it was better to show the airdates, TV channels, and titles that Honda directed per show. I felt this was excessive and unorganized. My proposal was a compromise by combining elements of both edits (see the table example above). Andrzejbanas then suggested a filmography article, which I prematurely created and that's how we ended up to where we are now. 557: 368: 317: 88: 64: 547: 526: 22: 150: 215: 1301:- Option two doesn't have a column indicating they were all directing roles, and the prose doesn't clarify that anywhere that I can see. If the air date, channel, and all that extra information is actually in the source cited, it seems like useful information that isn't available in another Knowledge article. (For example, the table shows he directed 5 episodes of 98: 1109:
where in row after row adds nothing new to the information than episode release dates. My personal perception -and that is how encyclopedic logic should work- has been in encyclopedia, focus should be on encyclopedic paragraph writing than decorative tabulation where one can do without tables. So if
746:
I think we could remove the network but might as well include the dates and episodes in the article. I think its more messy to have users hop between titles of episodes and tag. If you are worried about the size being unruly, perhaps its time to create a page that is caled "Ishiro Honda filmography"
665:
My revised edit was undone due to the old edit being considered "better" for revealing which episodes Honda directed. I feel its overkill to give the airdates and individual episodes their own columns. It's excessive and unorganized. I suggest the episodes list and airdates be covered in an EFN (see
913:
That's the dispute I have with the current edit. I do feel that the episode/airdate columns extend into something outrageous. Adding the episodes list and airdates to an EFN is a decent compromise. We wouldn't be losing the info completely. It'll still be there and accessible through the EFN in the
1447:
labelled as "presented like this". When I said "first" I was referring to the first example and when I said "second" I was referring to the second example. Any lengthy note should be shifted into a footnote, particularly if it would be repeated in several cells. However, I'm not saying that the
814:
I love old Asian cinema and have seen a couple of Honda's films, this article really isn't that huge. There was no need to split his filmography from the article. I think there needs to be more focus to use other sources, there is a dominance from one source throughout the article and I feel that
1583:
As for the TV table, I really don't see the need to supply the TV network in a column and at the same time you're separating the air-date from the episode which is kinda strange. I don't think that should be happening. But I like seeing the episode list, it's not long, or cumbersome. The smaller
1050:
No no, I understood you. I just don't agree. I think adding the years is a bit more specific for television. With some exceptions, most directors aren't releasing 5 films a year, here we have several tv shows released in the same year. To clarify their release order, I think the original release
898:
There doesn't seem to be a lot of guides specifically for television for directors in this filmography guide. I would leave the dates in to make it clear which episodes were released first, as that information is not readily available elsewhere. The networks can be scrapped as stated, but I feel
1035:
That still retains the very dispute I have with the current edit. Perhaps I didn't illustrate my point as well as I thought I did, my apologies. The issue that I have is that each episode and their airdates are given their own rowspan instead of unifying them under a single rowspan like
2020:
For this article to be nominated for GA, I need to fix this reference. The CW isn't a reliable source, and I can't find online sources which talk about what happens in the episode (although the man's official website mentions it being based around Honda-san). Any ideas? -
35: 928:
I feel like adding it there isn't useful and makes it more frustrating to read for viewers. Its not a difficult to understand table the way it is currently laid out. So far, I really don't see much positive change from altering it beyond dropping the networks.
1532:
I didn't weigh in here because I figured I'd said what I wanted to say earlier. Generally, people here seem to want a mix of both our styles. I still stand we can drop network, and the empty notes section. Otherwise, everything else I feel is good to keep in.
1142:
Knowledge is not democracy but moves according to democratic vote where people believing in non-encyclopedic ways too get precedence lot of time so RFC also wont guarantee you a success. So if you are too serious file RFC and if not ignore and let it
1568:
That may have been premature on my part. Apologies for that and apologies for pinging you again, but this question is for you. It's been suggested so far to combine both edits. What do you think should be retained and removed for the new wikitable?
674:, you reverted my edit. So what do you think about this compromise? It merges the old edit with the new edit. The expanded efn will be shown below the article, not on top of the table like it shows here. Feel free to remove the table upon replying. 1899:
series, these films don't really have English titles as per Galbraith's book, they were not really released in English-language territories. I don't think it's appropriate to give them English titles as these films were never named that.
1101:
First one technicality just for information, Since already 3 people are in discussion WP:4o need to apply as per Knowledge culture, Pl. correct if my perception is not correct enough. Said that with following point we will come to main
1338:, by combing the old edit with the new edit. The episode titles and airdates would be covered in an EFN in the wikitable's notes column. The info would still be there, just moved to a different area that's still accessible to readers. 2107: 1934:
The key thing is they use "translations", not official release titles and to readers it would be misleading to say it is. It's convenient to have an English-language title (i.e: nobody commons speaking English says
1399:
aspects from both tables: the first Television table without individual episodes listed, and the second Films table which doesn't restrict the column size and which has shorter Notes. Watch the capitalization per
1113:
If not then, Wikipedians usually go by specific written guidelines and on this specific aspect about 'relevancy of table format where most of data is same in every cell for every date' need to be discussed through
1894:
exists, and states " it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources)". However, outside the
1065:
Hm. It appears we've reached an impasse, and it appears Govvy has chosen not to contribute further to this discussion. We could reach out for a third opinion since the situation now meets the requirements of
1517:
So how should we proceed with the wikitable in a way that can reach a consensus? Andrzejbanas, I'd appreciate it if contributed more to this discussion since you originally opposed and reverted my edit.
1820:
Haha. I'm not against changing the table up as I said I agree with it, I figured giving it some time for others who were involved earlier wouldn't be a bad thing for a relatively uncontroversial edit.
1036:
WP:FILMOGRAPHY recommends. The current edit creates excessive stacks of individual airdates and episode titles. I don't see how an EFN would be frustrating for readers. They're used all the time.
1448:
footnotes should be full of trivia; it still has to be notable information to be included in the article. If the sources are properly archived, readers can always go to them for more details. –
2102: 1995:
There's no real official standardized formatting per se, but I feel it's more accurate to the source which only says what they are credited as, not what they aren't. If that' makes any sense.
1547:
Sorry, but I haven't been paying attention, but as long as I can read the table either is fine, my qualm was that you split the table into a separate article when that clearly wasn't needed.
829:
Would you mind if we discuss that a bit later? The original issue that I brought up remains unresolved. It was regarding the TV wikitable. I edited the table to match the recommendations of
1352:
I think putting that in an EFN is a terrible idea. It'll look cluttered down there, and not every reader will see it. If it's going to be on the page, it should really be on the page.
1584:
table lacks all the information the bigger one provides. I was wondering have you thought about a table, where the TV show title is in a single row, with all the episodes underneath?
943:
I'd be happy to drop "Notes" as well. That was mostly added for information for users if there was anything quick to be added. Nothing has been, so it can probably be scrapped.
2087: 1370:, but since the episode list/airdates don't want to be lost, the EFN was the best compromise I came up with. Readers won't miss it. It will still be there via the EFN link. 2112: 455: 1404:. Relegating extra information to footnotes is fine. Tables should preferably be dense without a lot of wasted white space, whatever the browser width and text size. – 325: 188: 2127: 1943:). I'd suggest to "fix" this, is we have a separate heading for a translated title if there is no official English-language release of the film. What do you think? 297: 1965:
I don't think we should put "No" in the filmography box as the sources don't actually state that he "did not" do any specific job, but only states what he did do.
800:
Alright then. Since more input from other editors are needed and you already threw your hat into the ring, might as well hear your two cents. So what's your take?
463: 2142: 2077: 617: 607: 159: 74: 501: 384: 1429:
I'm a bit confused. Which parts specifically of both edits do you propose mixing? And when you say footnotes, are you referring to the EFN I proposed?
2092: 2072: 2147: 1366:
It looks equally as cluttered down they way it is now. The whole point of the EFN is to avoid clutter. My edit was following the recommendations of
2122: 2117: 2082: 376: 116: 307: 884:
doesn't mind switching back to the new edit with WP:FILMOGRAPHY's recommendations or settling for my proposal of combining the old/new edits?
2048: 579: 414: 407: 2137: 583: 120: 2132: 2097: 646: 480: 434: 421: 124: 115:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 570: 531: 248: 240: 2067: 489: 111: 69: 1858:, says that he died at 11:30 am when all other sources say that he died at 11:30 pm. Should this be noted in the article? - 1981: 1245: 1234:
I have, more than a dozen times back to September 2017, most recently in May 2020. The problem is the diacritic ō which
44: 252: 244: 228: 183: 1851: 1720:
this too. It would make the table smaller but I feel we should remove the Notes column since it was never used.
1357: 1314: 1289: 439: 650: 2000: 1970: 1948: 1905: 1825: 1767: 1739: 1707: 1538: 1056: 1025: 948: 934: 904: 752: 1214:
Something appears to have gone wrong with the transclusion for this RfC; it's showing up on RfC lists as
2026: 1989: 1928: 1863: 1367: 876:
that's exactly what I did originally but my edit edit was reverted to the previous/current edit. Unless
830: 50: 1891: 642: 471: 21: 1498: 1353: 1329: 1310: 1285: 1262: 778:
That is not a consensus, you need much more input from other editors. I have restored the content.
256: 1117:
If user Andrzejbanas is not on the same page then RFC is better option so others will deliberate.
1762:
Couldn't hurt to tag some others who were involved in the conversation to get a quick yes or no.
1453: 1409: 1306: 1215: 1168: 447: 1789: 1996: 1966: 1944: 1901: 1875: 1821: 1811: 1763: 1753: 1735: 1725: 1703: 1603: 1574: 1534: 1523: 1512: 1474: 1434: 1375: 1343: 1239: 1204: 1106: 1094: 1075: 1052: 1041: 1021: 944: 930: 919: 900: 889: 879: 842: 805: 766: 748: 679: 669: 562: 2022: 1985: 1924: 1859: 1150: 103: 1870:
I think a good compromise would be if we mention both, like " states , however, states ".
1797: 1688: 1589: 1552: 860: 852: 820: 783: 575: 204: 177: 1255: 367: 2061: 1491: 1464: 1449: 1424: 1405: 1222: 1164: 899:
like, which episodes he worked on do not extend the tables into anything outrageous.
1915:
I see very little usage of the native titles and as I have already explained to you
556: 1871: 1807: 1749: 1721: 1599: 1570: 1519: 1470: 1430: 1401: 1371: 1339: 1235: 1200: 1160: 1137: 1086: 1071: 1067: 1037: 915: 885: 838: 801: 762: 675: 260: 220: 1146: 578:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can 316: 1920: 1218:. Not sure how to go about addressing this, I've never seen this issue before. 1110:
my position is acceptable that would be most simple for both of you to work on.
87: 63: 1793: 1684: 1585: 1563: 1548: 1505: 1443:
I was referring to the two examples in the opening statement, which were each
871: 856: 816: 795: 779: 552: 210: 93: 1191:
Seeking further discussion on whether content on the TV wiki table should be
2004: 1974: 1952: 1909: 1879: 1829: 1815: 1801: 1771: 1757: 1743: 1729: 1711: 1692: 1607: 1593: 1578: 1556: 1542: 1527: 1478: 1457: 1438: 1413: 1379: 1361: 1347: 1318: 1293: 1266: 1229: 1208: 1172: 1154: 1079: 1060: 1045: 1029: 952: 938: 923: 908: 893: 864: 846: 824: 809: 787: 770: 756: 683: 654: 1020:
I don't see how a table with four columns is considered busy beyond this.
1598:
You mean like a separate wikitable solely dedicate to the episodes list?
574:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about 149: 546: 525: 123:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 2038: 2036: 1980:
I added it because nearly every article on Knowledge uses it (eg.
639:
The quality of this article is lacking, it's almost stub status.
234: 1652:"Honey, It's a Presidential Order" ("Anata shacho meirei yo") 1469:
I see. So does the first example match what you're proposing?
15: 2108:
Unknown-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
761:
I wouldn't object to a new page for the filmography section.
366: 315: 148: 1748:
Do we add the new table now or wait for further consensus?
1666:"We're Going South-Southwest" ("Nan nan sei ni ikuno yo") 494: 1854:
Ishiro Honda: A Life in Film, from Godzilla to Kurosawa
1676:
Husbands, Men, Be Strong (Otto yo otoko yo tsuyokunare)
1335: 1281: 1277: 1250: 1196: 1192: 834: 360: 355: 350: 345: 268: 1309:
lists him as the only director for all 51 episodes?)
2047:
sfn error: no target: CITEREFRyfleGodziszewski2017 (
467:: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. 255:. Current time in Japan: 09:55, September 29, 2024 ( 232:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 989: 734:"Operation Monster Rainbow" - Airdate: May 14, 1971 2103:B-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles 1248:) cannot handle; the fix is to create a redirect, 1012:"The Woman, at That Moment" ("Onna wa sono toki") 833:. It made the table more organized and contained, 738:"The Five Ultra Pledges" - Airdate: March 31, 1971 732:"Takkong's Great Revenge" - Airdate: April 9, 1971 2042: 730:"Charge of the Monsters" - Airdate: April 2, 1971 247:, where you can join the project, participate in 1334:Yes! That's exactly what I was proposing above, 582:. To improve this article, please refer to the 1163:request since an RfC has been opened below. – 970:What I would propose is something like this. 8: 747:to keep things a bit more simple and clean. 1806:I see you're a man of culture as well! lol 2088:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in People 977: 520: 333: 172: 58: 2113:Actors and filmmakers work group articles 1622: 687: 2032: 723: 522: 269: 174: 60: 19: 2128:High-importance Japan-related articles 1683:I mean a table similar to this above. 851:Please follow the suggest guidelines; 996: 7: 568:This article is within the scope of 226:This article is within the scope of 109:This article is within the scope of 1187:RfC on TV Wikitable Content Dispute 736:"SOS Monster Island" - May 29, 1971 239:on Knowledge. If you would like to 49:It is of interest to the following 2143:Mid-importance television articles 2078:Knowledge vital articles in People 1982:Quentin Tarantino filmography#Film 1856:which I transferred to archive.org 990: 14: 1105:I have earlier observed a case @ 324:This article is supported by the 160:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers 2093:B-Class vital articles in People 2073:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 1734:Ditto on the notes ..uhh..note! 592:Knowledge:WikiProject Television 555: 545: 524: 213: 203: 176: 96: 86: 62: 29: 20: 2148:WikiProject Television articles 1941:The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly 1937:Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo 1866:) 8:30, 28 December 2021 (UTC) 1788:Or you could just go ahead and 1395:. I would go with the shorter 1280:. The second option looks like 612:This article has been rated as 595:Template:WikiProject Television 302:This article has been rated as 133:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 2123:B-Class Japan-related articles 2118:WikiProject Biography articles 2083:B-Class level-5 vital articles 2029:) 5:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC) 1992:) 7:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 1931:) 8:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 1276:- The first option looks like 136:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 2043:Ryfle & Godziszewski 2017 1923:both use the translations. - 1880:20:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC) 655:15:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 337:WikiProject Japan to do list: 157:This article is supported by 2005:21:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 1975:19:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC) 1953:21:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 1917:Ishiro Honda: A Life in Film 1910:19:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC) 121:contribute to the discussion 2138:B-Class television articles 1961:"No" in the filmography box 853:WP:ACTOR#Filmography tables 459:to articles that need them. 398:Featured content candidates 282:Knowledge:WikiProject Japan 2164: 2133:WikiProject Japan articles 2098:B-Class biography articles 1107:Meray Paas Tum Ho#Episodes 618:project's importance scale 393: 308:project's importance scale 285:Template:WikiProject Japan 1830:13:55, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 1674: 1639: 1634: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1479:00:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC) 1458:14:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) 1439:22:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 1414:14:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 1380:22:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 1362:12:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 1348:11:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 1319:11:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 1294:11:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 1267:21:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC) 1230:21:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC) 1209:19:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC) 1173:14:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC) 1155:17:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC) 1080:05:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC) 1061:18:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC) 1046:18:12, 24 June 2020 (UTC) 1030:16:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC) 986: 983: 980: 953:16:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC) 939:16:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC) 924:22:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC) 909:22:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC) 894:22:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC) 865:12:38, 23 June 2020 (UTC) 847:21:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC) 825:21:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC) 810:20:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC) 788:20:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC) 771:19:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC) 757:16:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC) 684:05:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC) 611: 540: 332: 323: 301: 198: 156: 81: 57: 1816:21:38, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 1802:12:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 1772:12:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 1758:02:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 1744:17:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 1730:10:48, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 1712:10:06, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 1693:14:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC) 1608:11:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC) 1594:10:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC) 1579:10:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC) 1557:09:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC) 1543:08:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC) 1528:07:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC) 815:needs addressing first. 435:Good article nominations 2068:B-Class vital articles 1159:FYI, I've removed the 709:The Return of Ultraman 571:WikiProject Television 371: 320: 288:Japan-related articles 153: 1305:, but the infobox on 586:for the type of work. 370: 319: 152: 112:WikiProject Biography 75:Actors and Filmmakers 36:level-5 vital article 1051:should be included. 493:an article from the 475:Japan-related stubs. 326:Biography task force 249:relevant discussions 2014:Legends of Tomorrow 1197:presented like this 1193:presented like this 598:television articles 580:join the discussion 576:television programs 505:unassessed articles 253:lists of open tasks 243:, please visit the 1890:I understand that 1641:Return of Ultraman 1307:Return of Ultraman 1303:Return of Ultraman 495:Japanese Knowledge 481:requested articles 472:Improve and expand 464:Pages for Deletion 448:Godzilla Minus One 372: 321: 154: 139:biography articles 45:content assessment 1850:I noticed on the 1702:the table above. 1681: 1680: 1216:Talk:Ishir? Honda 1018: 1017: 720: 719: 645:comment added by 632: 631: 628: 627: 624: 623: 563:Television portal 519: 518: 515: 514: 511: 510: 430: 429: 276: 237:-related articles 229:WikiProject Japan 171: 170: 167: 166: 2155: 2053: 2052: 2040: 1921:official website 1663: 1649: 1623: 1567: 1516: 1509: 1502: 1495: 1468: 1428: 1333: 1258: 1253: 1141: 1098: 1090: 1009: 992: 978: 883: 875: 799: 739: 728: 688: 673: 666:example below). 657: 600: 599: 596: 593: 590: 584:style guidelines 565: 560: 559: 549: 542: 541: 536: 528: 521: 456:requested images 392: 391: 334: 290: 289: 286: 283: 280: 273: 271: 264: 223: 218: 217: 216: 207: 200: 199: 194: 191: 180: 173: 141: 140: 137: 134: 131: 117:join the project 106: 104:Biography portal 101: 100: 99: 90: 83: 82: 77: 66: 59: 42: 33: 32: 25: 24: 16: 2163: 2162: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2046: 2041: 2034: 2018: 1963: 1888: 1852:online copy of 1848: 1662:30 October 1969 1661: 1647: 1561: 1510: 1503: 1496: 1489: 1462: 1422: 1327: 1256: 1249: 1221: 1189: 1135: 1092: 1084: 1007: 976: 877: 869: 793: 743: 742: 729: 725: 667: 663: 640: 637: 597: 594: 591: 588: 587: 561: 554: 534: 365: 304:High-importance 287: 284: 281: 278: 277: 267: 219: 214: 212: 193:High‑importance 192: 186: 138: 135: 132: 129: 128: 102: 97: 95: 72: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 30: 12: 11: 5: 2161: 2159: 2151: 2150: 2145: 2140: 2135: 2130: 2125: 2120: 2115: 2110: 2105: 2100: 2095: 2090: 2085: 2080: 2075: 2070: 2060: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2031: 2017: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 1962: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1887: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1847: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1760: 1714: 1679: 1678: 1672: 1671: 1669: 1667: 1664: 1658: 1657: 1655: 1653: 1650: 1648:9 October 1969 1644: 1643: 1637: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1627: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1499:Argento Surfer 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1417: 1416: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1368:WP:FILMOGRAPHY 1354:Argento Surfer 1330:Argento Surfer 1322: 1321: 1311:Argento Surfer 1299:A mix of both? 1296: 1286:Argento Surfer 1271: 1270: 1269: 1219: 1188: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1144: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1115: 1111: 1103: 1099: 1016: 1015: 1013: 1010: 1008:7 January 1967 1005: 994: 993: 988: 985: 984:Premiere date 982: 975: 972: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 941: 914:Notes column. 896: 831:WP:FILMOGRAPHY 776: 775: 774: 773: 741: 740: 737: 735: 733: 731: 722: 721: 718: 717: 714: 711: 706: 702: 701: 698: 695: 692: 662: 659: 636: 633: 630: 629: 626: 625: 622: 621: 614:Mid-importance 610: 604: 603: 601: 567: 566: 550: 538: 537: 535:Mid‑importance 529: 517: 516: 513: 512: 509: 508: 507: 506: 498: 485: 476: 468: 460: 451: 428: 427: 419: 412: 403: 402: 401: 390: 389: 385:A-class review 381: 364: 363: 358: 353: 348: 342: 339: 338: 330: 329: 322: 312: 311: 300: 294: 293: 291: 225: 224: 208: 196: 195: 181: 169: 168: 165: 164: 155: 145: 144: 142: 108: 107: 91: 79: 78: 67: 55: 54: 48: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2160: 2149: 2146: 2144: 2141: 2139: 2136: 2134: 2131: 2129: 2126: 2124: 2121: 2119: 2116: 2114: 2111: 2109: 2106: 2104: 2101: 2099: 2096: 2094: 2091: 2089: 2086: 2084: 2081: 2079: 2076: 2074: 2071: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2063: 2050: 2044: 2039: 2037: 2033: 2030: 2028: 2024: 2015: 2012: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1993: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1960: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1933: 1932: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1898: 1893: 1892:WP:COMMONNAME 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1855: 1846:Time of death 1845: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1677: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1665: 1660: 1659: 1656: 1654: 1651: 1646: 1645: 1642: 1638: 1624: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1565: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1514: 1507: 1500: 1493: 1488: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1426: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1331: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1252: 1247: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1217: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1186: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1145: 1139: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1088: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1014: 1011: 1006: 1003: 999: 998:The Newlyweds 995: 979: 973: 971: 954: 950: 946: 942: 940: 936: 932: 927: 926: 925: 921: 917: 912: 911: 910: 906: 902: 897: 895: 891: 887: 881: 873: 868: 867: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 849: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 827: 826: 822: 818: 813: 812: 811: 807: 803: 797: 792: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 772: 768: 764: 760: 759: 758: 754: 750: 745: 744: 727: 724: 715: 712: 710: 707: 704: 703: 699: 696: 693: 690: 689: 686: 685: 681: 677: 671: 660: 658: 656: 652: 648: 647:50.78.183.102 644: 635:Short article 634: 619: 615: 609: 606: 605: 602: 585: 581: 577: 573: 572: 564: 558: 553: 551: 548: 544: 543: 539: 533: 530: 527: 523: 504: 503: 499: 497:into English. 496: 492: 491: 486: 483: 482: 477: 474: 473: 469: 466: 465: 461: 458: 457: 452: 450: 449: 444: 442: 437: 436: 432: 431: 426: 424: 423: 417: 416: 410: 409: 404: 399: 396: 395: 394: 387: 386: 382: 379: 378: 374: 373: 369: 362: 359: 357: 354: 352: 349: 347: 344: 343: 341: 340: 336: 335: 331: 327: 318: 314: 313: 309: 305: 299: 296: 295: 292: 275: 272: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 236: 231: 230: 222: 211: 209: 206: 202: 201: 197: 190: 185: 182: 179: 175: 162: 161: 151: 147: 146: 143: 126: 125:documentation 122: 118: 114: 113: 105: 94: 92: 89: 85: 84: 80: 76: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 37: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2019: 2013: 1997:Andrzejbanas 1967:Andrzejbanas 1964: 1945:Andrzejbanas 1940: 1936: 1916: 1902:Andrzejbanas 1896: 1889: 1853: 1849: 1822:Andrzejbanas 1764:Andrzejbanas 1736:Andrzejbanas 1717: 1704:Andrzejbanas 1699: 1682: 1675: 1640: 1535:Andrzejbanas 1513:Andrzejbanas 1444: 1402:MOS:JOBTITLE 1396: 1392: 1302: 1298: 1273: 1242: 1224: 1223: 1190: 1095:Andrzejbanas 1053:Andrzejbanas 1022:Andrzejbanas 1019: 1001: 997: 969: 945:Andrzejbanas 931:Andrzejbanas 901:Andrzejbanas 880:Andrzejbanas 777: 749:Andrzejbanas 726: 708: 670:Andrzejbanas 664: 661:TV wikitable 641:— Preceding 638: 613: 569: 500: 488: 479: 478:Create some 470: 462: 454: 446: 441:Vinland Saga 440: 433: 420: 413: 406: 405: 397: 383: 375: 303: 265: 245:project page 233: 227: 221:Japan portal 158: 110: 51:WikiProjects 34: 2023:Eiga-Kevin2 1986:Eiga-Kevin2 1939:, they say 1925:Eiga-Kevin2 1886:Film titles 1860:Eiga-Kevin2 1445:unhelpfully 1397:versions of 1393:Mix of both 1002:Shinkon san 716:5 episodes 443:(TV series) 377:Peer review 241:participate 2062:Categories 1134:Said that 974:Television 589:Television 532:Television 251:, and see 2045:, p. 302. 2016:reference 1251:like this 697:Director 490:translate 189:Biography 130:Biography 70:Biography 39:is rated 1919:and the 1897:Godzilla 1629:Episode 1492:Reidgreg 1465:Reidgreg 1450:Reidgreg 1425:Reidgreg 1406:Reidgreg 1336:see here 1246:contribs 1225:Rosguill 1220:signed, 1165:Reidgreg 987:Episode 835:see here 643:unsigned 415:Pictures 408:Articles 1872:Armegon 1808:Armegon 1750:Armegon 1722:Armegon 1718:support 1700:Support 1600:Armegon 1571:Armegon 1520:Armegon 1471:Armegon 1431:Armegon 1372:Armegon 1340:Armegon 1274:Comment 1236:Legobot 1201:Armegon 1138:Armegon 1087:Armegon 1072:Armegon 1038:Armegon 916:Armegon 886:Armegon 839:Armegon 802:Armegon 763:Armegon 676:Armegon 616:on the 425:: None 418:: None 411:: None 351:history 306:on the 270:Refresh 41:B-class 1790:Do It! 1259:rose64 1147:Bookku 1102:point. 1091:& 991:Ref(s) 700:Notes 694:Title 502:Assess 388:: None 380:: None 47:scale. 1794:Govvy 1685:Govvy 1632:Note 1626:Date 1586:Govvy 1564:Govvy 1549:Govvy 1506:Govvy 1161:WP:3O 1068:WP:3O 981:Show 872:Govvy 857:Govvy 817:Govvy 796:Govvy 780:Govvy 705:1971 691:Year 487:Help 422:Lists 361:purge 356:watch 279:Japan 261:Reiwa 235:Japan 184:Japan 28:This 2049:help 2027:talk 2001:talk 1990:talk 1984:) - 1971:talk 1949:talk 1929:talk 1906:talk 1876:talk 1864:talk 1826:talk 1812:talk 1798:talk 1768:talk 1754:talk 1740:talk 1726:talk 1708:talk 1698:I'd 1689:talk 1635:Ref 1604:talk 1590:talk 1575:talk 1553:talk 1539:talk 1524:talk 1475:talk 1454:talk 1435:talk 1410:talk 1376:talk 1358:talk 1344:talk 1315:talk 1290:talk 1282:this 1278:this 1263:talk 1261:🌹 ( 1254:. -- 1240:talk 1205:talk 1169:talk 1151:talk 1114:RFC. 1076:talk 1057:talk 1042:talk 1026:talk 949:talk 935:talk 920:talk 905:talk 890:talk 861:talk 843:talk 821:talk 806:talk 784:talk 767:talk 753:talk 713:Yes 680:talk 651:talk 453:Add 346:edit 298:High 119:and 1257:Red 1195:or 1143:go. 608:Mid 263:6) 257:JST 2064:: 2035:^ 2003:) 1973:) 1951:) 1908:) 1878:) 1828:) 1814:) 1800:) 1792:. 1770:) 1756:) 1742:) 1728:) 1716:I 1710:) 1691:) 1606:) 1592:) 1577:) 1555:) 1541:) 1526:) 1477:) 1456:) 1437:) 1412:) 1378:) 1360:) 1346:) 1317:) 1292:) 1284:. 1265:) 1207:) 1199:. 1171:) 1153:) 1078:) 1070:. 1059:) 1044:) 1028:) 1004:) 951:) 937:) 922:) 907:) 892:) 863:) 855:. 845:) 823:) 808:) 786:) 769:) 755:) 682:) 653:) 445:, 438:: 400:– 259:, 187:: 73:: 2051:) 2025:( 1999:( 1988:( 1969:( 1947:( 1927:( 1904:( 1874:( 1862:( 1824:( 1810:( 1796:( 1766:( 1752:( 1738:( 1724:( 1706:( 1687:( 1602:( 1588:( 1573:( 1566:: 1562:@ 1551:( 1537:( 1522:( 1515:: 1511:@ 1508:: 1504:@ 1501:: 1497:@ 1494:: 1490:@ 1473:( 1467:: 1463:@ 1452:( 1433:( 1427:: 1423:@ 1408:( 1374:( 1356:( 1342:( 1332:: 1328:@ 1313:( 1288:( 1243:· 1238:( 1203:( 1167:( 1149:( 1140:: 1136:@ 1097:: 1093:@ 1089:: 1085:@ 1074:( 1055:( 1040:( 1024:( 1000:( 947:( 933:( 918:( 903:( 888:( 882:: 878:@ 874:: 870:@ 859:( 841:( 819:( 804:( 798:: 794:@ 782:( 765:( 751:( 678:( 672:: 668:@ 649:( 620:. 484:. 328:. 310:. 274:) 266:( 163:. 127:. 53::

Index


level-5 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Biography
Actors and Filmmakers
WikiProject icon
Biography portal
WikiProject Biography
join the project
contribute to the discussion
documentation
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
WikiProject icon
Japan
Biography
WikiProject icon
Japan portal
WikiProject Japan
Japan
participate
project page
relevant discussions
lists of open tasks
JST
Reiwa
Refresh
High

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.