234:
213:
117:
92:
61:
244:
322:
179:
32:
103:
127:
572:
the note, which on the face of it suggests that Fr
Tolkien admitted those allegations, and was possibly sent for treatment. Aside from that treatment, it seems no action was taken in 1968, and certainly no action was taken by Archbishop Couve de Murville in 1993. Neither matter was reported to the authorities."
602:
Please tell me how are my edits unsourced or not backed up, or try to point out any fallacy in what I've said or cited? It does clearly seem you have no actual argument. In fact I know you know they are well-cited and are still reverting them. As for tabloid, which source do you claim as tabloid and
510:
your account seems to have become a SPA these past many months as you're solely dedicated to
Tolkien. You also keep removing my content despite knowing that it's well-sourced and quoted. Why are you removing it? It seems your objective is to remove anything that might implicate Tolkien. Such biased
571:
Jacqueline Carey, counsel to the inquiry said: "As part of
Archbishop Couve de Murville's 1993 inquiries, he appears to have read a note from 1968 which alleged that Fr Tolkien had made some Boy Scouts strip naked. The actual note is not available but we have Archbishop Couve de Murville's note of
526:
Your content additions are either not sourced at all, sourced by citations that on inspection that do not back up your claims or sourced by non WP:RS tabloid newspapers. By all means reads your content if it can be properly sourced. I note your unwarranted personal attack in the comment above. Be
561:
Investigators said there is evidence to suggest Fr
Tolkien admitted the abuse. The evidence emerged in a note uncovered during a week-long series of hearings of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, which is examining the Archdiocese of Birmingham's response to allegations made against
583:
As part of
Archbishop Couve de Murville's own inquiries, he appears to have read a 1968 file note which alleged that Fr Tolkien had made some boy scouts strip naked. The actual note is not available but the Archbishop's note of the 1968 note, on the face of it, suggested that Fr Tolkien admitted
488:
I found many claims unsubstantiated and unsourced, both by
Rathfelder and Tonyinman. Tonyinman had also removed information that was properly sourced. So I rewrote the section. Also I've removed the primary sources as secondary sources and many of the claims are either not backed by them or the
438:
Your argument above is a non sequitur. All your sources are based on the
Inquiry transcripts. Therefore using the Inquiry transcripts is inherently more reliable that using cherry picked POV tabloid to support your determined effort to present a non-balanced and one-sided biased account on this
405:
No, if you read the sources I added, they are the transcripts from the inquiry - the primary source for which ALL the news reports, including the tabloid reports you are using have relied upon. Therefore, as per WP:RS it is best to use the primary source.
484:
Finding that a user named
Rathfelder who was banned for COI and seems to be connected to the subject made edits to the "Child sexual abuse allegations", I have rewritten it. Some of it was already changed by another editor Tonyinman.
492:
Also just a full disclosure so no one wrongly suspects or accuses me of being connected to
Rathfelder, I'm not related to that user. If you think otherwise you can report me to a sockpuppet investigation. Thank you for your time.
636:
tabloid newspapers. Your claims need to be backed by reliable 3rd party sources. Adding a source that does not back up a claim, or using unreliable sources, is not how
Knowledge works. You may find this guide
562:
four priests including Fr Tolkien. The note "on the face of it suggests that Fr Tolkien admitted those allegations, and was possibly sent for treatment," Jacqueline Carey, counsel to the inquiry, said.
595:
Your claim "and the inquiry were not able to examine it or assess it. Also, since the Archbishop had long since died, he could not be questioned." is not backed up by your own source, ie the BBC
42:
388:
What you are relying on is the briefing put out before the hearing. The reports are of the testimony at the hearing. None of the sources I've used could be called the tabloid press.
632:
As I explained earlier very clearly, your content additions are either not sourced at all, sourced by citations that on inspection that do not back up your claims or sourced by non
481:
I'm a fan of JRR Tolkien and follow articles about him or related to him. I had recently seen the article being littered with complaints about issues and decided to investigate.
439:
biography page. If you disagree, by all means take the matter to RS notice board for consensus. That's all I have to say re the Inquiry transcripts the most reliable source.
423:"Knowledge articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources, i.e., a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere."
695:
553:
My claim about the Counsel to the Inquiry Jacqueline Carey talking about the note against Tolkien, not the lawyers for the victims as you claimed, is backed by sources.
710:
290:
705:
371:
the inquiry source is the source all the others are based upon. As the and a primary source it is inherently more reliable than the tabloid press. See Wp:RS
300:
700:
690:
145:
606:
You should also stop resorting to your tricks of getting protection for the article to impose what you want. I will revert you no matter what.
546:, you're obviously being biased about Tolkien and don't want anything that implicates him. Because your reverts are made under false pretexts.
462:) 14:59, 16 December 2018 (UTC) Whose Opinion do you think was presented as fact? These are Carrie's allegations and accounts of what he did.
149:
512:
494:
715:
579:
342:
266:
153:
354:
The inquiry document is not the only source. There are multiple reports of evidence from the inquiry and interviews with witnesses.
607:
144:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
140:
97:
639:] useful. By all means re-add your content *if* it can be properly sourced using reliable sources, and the claims are not
257:
218:
72:
578:
My claim about the original 1968 note not existing is backed up by IICSA, it doesn't say the 1993 note is missing,
334:
195:
38:
590:
You have falsely claimed that the lawyers for the victims talked about the note and the 1993 note was missing.
60:
516:
498:
611:
566:
78:
467:
459:
428:
393:
359:
102:
31:
671:
532:
444:
411:
376:
345:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
265:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
17:
651:
646:
Regarding the page protection, the reasons for this are detailed in the article log - please
596:
132:
454:
How do you know they are based on the transcripts? Some appear to be based on interviews.
640:
626:
556:
463:
455:
424:
389:
355:
667:
655:
543:
528:
507:
440:
407:
372:
249:
684:
659:
647:
663:
633:
622:
233:
212:
675:
615:
536:
520:
502:
471:
448:
432:
415:
397:
380:
363:
489:
claims are unnecessarily lengthy and can be summed up in one or two sentences.
116:
91:
239:
122:
178:
584:
these allegations (seeCHC000253_11) and was possibly sent for treatment.
262:
152:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
625:, and as such I shall not respond to them further. Be mindful of
316:
54:
26:
177:
338:
329:
650:
There are no restrictions on you creating an account
261:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
549:Btw here are the sources and quotes for my edits:
8:
542:Saying the obvious is not a personal attack
621:Your comments are indeed a personal attack
58:
598:. There's no such statement in the source.
320:
207:
86:
696:Knowledge requested photographs of people
327:Text and/or other creative content from
711:Low-importance England-related articles
209:
88:
582:
570:
560:
7:
706:Start-Class England-related articles
255:This article is within the scope of
138:This article is within the scope of
77:It is of interest to the following
41:on 10 December 2018. The result of
25:
242:
232:
211:
186:An editor has requested that an
125:
115:
101:
90:
59:
30:
662:content using reliable sources
567:Birmingham Post via PressReader
295:This article has been rated as
162:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
37:This article was nominated for
18:Talk:John Francis Reuel Tolkien
701:WikiProject Biography articles
691:Start-Class biography articles
527:minded of WP:CIVIL in future.
165:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
503:13:03, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
472:15:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
449:12:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
433:12:27, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
416:11:42, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
398:11:37, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
381:11:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
364:11:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
275:Knowledge:WikiProject England
269:and see a list of open tasks.
278:Template:WikiProject England
150:contribute to the discussion
732:
569:also says the same thing:
537:18:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
521:13:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
511:behaviour is not allowed.
335:John Francis Reuel Tolkien
301:project's importance scale
716:WikiProject England pages
676:00:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
616:05:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
333:was copied or moved into
294:
227:
185:
110:
85:
281:England-related articles
666:, as described above.
603:what's your evidence?
182:
67:This article is rated
181:
141:WikiProject Biography
337:. The former page's
343:provide attribution
258:WikiProject England
183:
168:biography articles
73:content assessment
349:
348:
315:
314:
311:
310:
307:
306:
206:
205:
202:
201:
53:
52:
16:(Redirected from
723:
332:
324:
323:
317:
283:
282:
279:
276:
273:
252:
247:
246:
245:
236:
229:
228:
223:
215:
208:
198:to this article.
170:
169:
166:
163:
160:
146:join the project
135:
133:Biography portal
130:
129:
128:
119:
112:
111:
106:
105:
104:
94:
87:
70:
64:
63:
55:
34:
27:
21:
731:
730:
726:
725:
724:
722:
721:
720:
681:
680:
479:
328:
321:
280:
277:
274:
271:
270:
248:
243:
241:
221:
167:
164:
161:
158:
157:
131:
126:
124:
100:
71:on Knowledge's
68:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
729:
727:
719:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
683:
682:
679:
678:
644:
630:
600:
599:
592:
591:
587:
586:
575:
574:
564:
554:
544:User:Tonyinman
540:
539:
508:User:Tonyinman
478:
475:
452:
451:
421:
420:
419:
418:
386:
385:
384:
383:
351:
347:
346:
341:now serves to
330:Tolkien family
325:
313:
312:
309:
308:
305:
304:
297:Low-importance
293:
287:
286:
284:
267:the discussion
254:
253:
250:England portal
237:
225:
224:
222:Low‑importance
216:
204:
203:
200:
199:
184:
174:
173:
171:
137:
136:
120:
108:
107:
95:
83:
82:
76:
65:
51:
50:
43:the discussion
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
728:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
688:
686:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
642:
638:
635:
631:
628:
624:
620:
619:
618:
617:
613:
609:
604:
597:
594:
593:
589:
588:
585:
580:
577:
576:
573:
568:
563:
558:
552:
551:
550:
547:
545:
538:
534:
530:
525:
524:
523:
522:
518:
514:
513:59.91.229.198
509:
505:
504:
500:
496:
495:59.91.227.166
490:
486:
482:
476:
474:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
417:
413:
409:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
395:
391:
382:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
352:
344:
340:
336:
331:
326:
319:
318:
302:
298:
292:
289:
288:
285:
268:
264:
260:
259:
251:
240:
238:
235:
231:
230:
226:
220:
217:
214:
210:
197:
193:
189:
180:
176:
175:
172:
155:
154:documentation
151:
147:
143:
142:
134:
123:
121:
118:
114:
113:
109:
99:
96:
93:
89:
84:
80:
74:
66:
62:
57:
56:
48:
44:
40:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
605:
601:
548:
541:
506:
491:
487:
483:
480:
453:
422:
387:
353:
350:
296:
256:
191:
187:
139:
79:WikiProjects
46:
654:and adding
608:61.2.80.208
69:Start-class
685:Categories
652:WP:Account
629:in future.
557:BBC source
464:Rathfelder
456:Rathfelder
425:Rathfelder
390:Rathfelder
356:Rathfelder
192:photograph
668:Tonyinman
529:Tonyinman
441:Tonyinman
408:Tonyinman
373:Tonyinman
159:Biography
98:Biography
641:WP:Undue
627:WP:CIVIL
39:deletion
656:WP:NPOV
339:history
299:on the
272:England
263:England
219:England
660:WP:GNG
648:WP:AGF
477:Issues
75:scale.
664:WP:RS
634:WP:RS
623:WP:PA
196:added
188:image
672:talk
612:talk
555:The
533:talk
517:talk
499:talk
468:talk
460:talk
445:talk
429:talk
412:talk
394:talk
377:talk
360:talk
148:and
47:keep
45:was
291:Low
194:be
190:or
687::
674:)
658:/
614:)
581::
565:*
559::
535:)
519:)
501:)
470:)
447:)
431:)
414:)
396:)
379:)
362:)
670:(
643:.
610:(
531:(
515:(
497:(
466:(
458:(
443:(
427:(
410:(
392:(
375:(
358:(
303:.
156:.
81::
49:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
