931:
885:
821:
782:
749:
715:
663:
617:
390:
332:
969:
423:
284:
56:
1043:
Yea, I had a feeling a reviewer is not gonna like the
Sneaker News ref. But I tried my best to only use it for ABOUTSELF reasons vis-a-vis Geller. I managed to remove all four Sneaker News ref. I wasn't able to find a better source for the "$ 10 million" sales, so I removed it
482:
interview probably isn't reliable for the
Wikivoice statement that he made $ 10 million. I'd recommend avoiding the use of the source where possible. Obviously, there's been little-to-no community discussion on the source (at least from what I could find), but seeing as there
195:
As a heads up, this is going to be updated in chunks; there over eighty references to go through, so it will take me a while to look through each one to evaluate the extent to which the statements made in the article are backed up by the text of those sources. —
730:
On my first read through, this article appears to cover all the main aspects of this individual well. A quick google search doesn't alert me to anything that's obviously missing, though there appear to be quite a few people in the news that share his name. —
235:
Not a problem! Just as a heads up, it is probably going to take me at least the next 24 hours to finish filling out the table. I’m only about halfway through the references at this point and I still need to do a thorough check for spelling/grammar/style. —
524:
While the newspaper reports that there's an idea to sell off all the inventory to make the collection, I'm not sure the source is writing that Geller's primary motivation in doing so was to show Nike who he was, so to speak. This could lumped under the
457:
doesn't give me confidence that it has good editorial control (it seems like there might be quite a bit of churnalism going on based upon a quick look through the website). You don't need to use this source when referencing his degrees
636:
feels like stringing a bunch of primary sources together. In general, I don't like these sorts of sentence formulations (it allows for listing of basically everyone who's made a comment and that can turn into
303:
The article doesn't currently state explicitly what the name of his favorite sneakers are; if someone doesn't have knowledge of U.S. Basketball or the sneaker market, they might not know that this refers to
950:
Images are relevant to the topic. The vast majority show the impressive collection, which seems to be apt given that this is the reason for the subject's notability. All photos are suitably captioned. —
912:
All images are tagged with copyright status on
Commons; it appears to me that all of the image license tags are correct after looking through them. No images appear to be fair use, so all checks out. —
1033:
as a child, deeming them too expensive, so he acquired his first pair of Air
Jordans while in college for $ 125." I could write: "Geller's name is coincidentally close to basketball player
443:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
440:
522:"I had this idea that I could sell off all that inventory and use the money to curate the world's greatest sneaker collection," he says. "I wanted to show Nike who they'd banned."
314:) could reasonably be used to explicitly state that the favorite sneakers of Geller's are those of the Air Jordan line. This would improve understanding for a broader audience. —
559:
and then accepting his explanation of his motivation as wholly truthful. It's probably better to attribute Geller's reason for moving to his words; something along the lines of
552:
claim to be using Geller's own words for. It's certainly reliable for the notion that Geller said what he said, but I wouldn't be quite comfortable with putting it in WikiVoice.
293:
357:
94:
544:. The article doesn't actually put that claim in the voice of its newsroom; it reports it as a claim made by Geller. As such, it's only as reliable for that claim as an
641:
pretty quick), but in this case I think that it's restrained enough. It would probably be better to specify which source went with which list, rather than doing this
1037:, who is also the namesake of Geller's favorite sneakers, Air Jordans." But that seems a bit redundant when juxtaposed with the previous sentence. What do you think?
529:
criterion as well, though I'm going to leave it here because I think that the inline cite doesn't support the text currently in the article rather than this being a
1047:
I'm not sure if I entirely agree that's an OR/SNYTH statement. But, out of an abundance of caution, I removed the "in order to "show Nike who they'd banned"" part.
84:
634:
Geller and the ShoeZeum were included on lists of "wild," "weirdest," or "most ridiculous" world records by CBS News, Reuters, Business
Insider, and BuzzFeed News
61:
902:
579:
537:
361:
353:
508:
Geller decided to sell off his inventory and use the money to "curate the world's greatest sneaker collection" in order to "show Nike who they'd banned"
645:-adjacent grouping. I don't think this is enough to hold up a GA nom on its own, so I'm marking it as neutral, though I think it could be improved. —
345:
686:
check; the tool flags more or less only direct quotations of a person speaking as potential copyright violation, so I see no need to worry here. —
462:
works fine there), but the part where it's used to verify the $ 10 million in sales seems to not be the most appropriate use of at what's best an
512:
140:
944:
487:
be mainstream sources for this kind of thing if it's notable I don't see this as a huge burden towards getting over the line. It's also a
136:
66:
349:
792:
261:
89:
121:
672:
626:
301:
Geller's name is coincidentally close to basketball player
Michael Jordan, who is also the namesake of Geller's favorite sneakers.
170:
894:
567:
would be a better alternative that renders the source clearly reliable for the claim being put into the
Knowledge (XXG) article.
556:
309:
555:
The reason given in the article for Geller's moving the museum to Vegas appears to arise from taking a quote of Geller's from
113:
1020:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
37:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1110:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1005:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
906:
593:
unworn set" (emphasis added). Similarly, the claim in the
Knowledge (XXG) article should probably hedge in a similar way.
432:
1081:
219:
436:
341:
898:
764:
On my first read through, the article seems to be focused on the article subject without being overly detailed. —
758:
549:
467:
375:
834:
724:
575:
1077:
1029:
I mean I see your point but the sentence right before states: "Geller's parents refused to purchase him any
230:
215:
676:
488:
545:
492:
475:
463:
536:
There's a statement in the article that 67 business executives visited Geller's museum. It's sourced to
989:
956:
918:
845:
808:
769:
736:
691:
650:
603:
572:
Out of the twelve Moon Shoes in existence, Geller's pair were the only ones that have never been worn
410:
319:
241:
201:
185:
164:
517:
496:
871:
867:
683:
491:
interview, for which extra caution needs to be used in BLPs. If you'd like a source that isn't an
940:
129:
17:
875:
642:
530:
1096:
398:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
800:
399:
985:
952:
914:
841:
804:
765:
732:
687:
646:
599:
406:
315:
237:
211:
197:
181:
160:
796:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
638:
526:
1034:
585:. The sources are a little less certain in their characterization than the article is;
106:
1092:
1073:
1030:
840:
There are no recent edit wars nor massive expansions to the article content. —
305:
214:. Thanks for doing this review!! I'll try to resolve the issues by next week.
1100:
1085:
993:
960:
922:
849:
812:
773:
757:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
740:
695:
654:
607:
414:
323:
245:
223:
205:
189:
174:
833:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
405:
This indeed contains a reference list that is properly laid out. —
520:, so the publisher is fine. The relevant text from that source is
470:, even if he's an accomplished sneakerhead). Regarding the use of
454:
799:
On my first read through, it appears that this article follows
180:
I'll take a look; this has been pending for way too long. —
1091:
All of the issues I've found are resolved. This is a GA. —
450:
474:
for the size of the warehouse, it's probably fine from an
148:
117:
589:
hedges with "is said to be" and CNN hedges with "only
510:is currently in the article. The given source is
294:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
548:source would be, and I think it's a bit of an
8:
570:This feels like a nitpick, but the sentence
466:interview (this sort of thing feels a bit
44:
503:is unquestionably an RS in this context.
254:
75:
47:
633:
571:
560:
521:
507:
300:
7:
1053:Agreed; rewrote per your suggestion.
1016:The following discussion is closed.
495:source for the warehouse size, this
296:; spelling and grammar are correct.
33:The following discussion is closed.
292:. the prose is clear, concise, and
331:
24:
1106:The discussion above is closed.
1001:The discussion above is closed.
967:
929:
883:
819:
780:
747:
713:
661:
615:
421:
388:
330:
282:
1056:Okay, included the word "known"
968:
616:
422:
283:
1066:Good call. I rewrote it a bit.
478:perspective. I think that the
449:I'm seeing some references to
441:could reasonably be challenged
1:
1101:06:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
1086:23:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
994:06:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
961:06:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
923:05:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
903:valid non-free use rationales
850:05:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
813:05:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
774:05:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
741:05:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
696:05:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
655:06:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
608:06:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
415:05:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
324:06:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
246:06:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
224:06:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
206:04:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
190:04:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
175:04:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
930:
884:
820:
781:
748:
714:
662:
389:
308:The source for that claim (
1125:
400:the layout style guideline
855:
701:
542:Portland Business Journal
370:
270:
260:
1108:Please do not modify it.
1018:Please do not modify it.
1003:Please do not modify it.
516:, which appears to be a
257:
35:Please do not modify it.
943:to the topic, and have
340:. it complies with the
1050:Attributed to Geller.
706:Broad in its coverage
574:is supported by this
837:or content dispute.
673:copyright violations
627:no original research
381:no original research
299:The article states,
984:On hold for now. —
723:. it addresses the
439:. All content that
1019:
979:Overall assessment
899:copyright statuses
862:, if possible, by
362:list incorporation
231:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d
36:
18:Talk:Jordan Geller
1017:
999:
998:
945:suitable captions
905:are provided for
671:. it contains no
563:The Las Vegas Sun
103:
102:
34:
1116:
971:
970:
933:
932:
907:non-free content
887:
886:
823:
822:
784:
783:
751:
750:
717:
716:
665:
664:
619:
618:
550:WP:EXTRAORDINARY
513:Williamette Week
468:WP:EXTRAORDINARY
433:reliable sources
425:
424:
392:
391:
334:
333:
286:
285:
255:
234:
153:
144:
125:
57:Copyvio detector
45:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1022:
1012:
1007:
1006:
596:
576:this CNN Source
344:guidelines for
342:Manual of Style
266:Review Comment
228:
134:
111:
105:
99:
71:
39:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1122:
1120:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1038:
1035:Michael Jordan
1025:
1023:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1000:
997:
996:
982:
972:
964:
963:
948:
934:
926:
925:
910:
888:
880:
879:
853:
852:
838:
824:
816:
815:
803:quite well. —
797:
785:
777:
776:
762:
752:
744:
743:
728:
727:of the topic.
718:
710:
709:
699:
698:
682:This passes a
680:
666:
658:
657:
630:
625:. it contains
620:
612:
611:
595:
594:
568:
553:
534:
504:
489:primary source
446:
444:
426:
418:
417:
403:
393:
385:
384:
368:
367:
365:
354:words to watch
335:
327:
326:
297:
287:
279:
278:
268:
267:
264:
259:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
179:
154:
101:
100:
98:
97:
92:
87:
81:
78:
77:
73:
72:
70:
69:
67:External links
64:
59:
53:
50:
49:
42:
40:
31:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1121:
1109:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1078:Dr. Swag Lord
1075:
1065:
1064:
1062:
1061:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1021:
1009:
1004:
995:
991:
987:
983:
980:
976:
973:
966:
965:
962:
958:
954:
949:
946:
942:
938:
935:
928:
927:
924:
920:
916:
911:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
889:
882:
881:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
858:
854:
851:
847:
843:
839:
836:
832:
828:
825:
818:
817:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
795:
794:
789:
786:
779:
778:
775:
771:
767:
763:
760:
759:summary style
756:
753:
746:
745:
742:
738:
734:
729:
726:
722:
719:
712:
711:
707:
704:
700:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
678:
674:
670:
667:
660:
659:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
635:
632:The sentence
631:
628:
624:
621:
614:
613:
610:
609:
605:
601:
592:
588:
584:
582:
577:
573:
569:
566:
564:
558:
554:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
532:
528:
523:
519:
515:
514:
509:
505:
502:
501:The Oregonian
498:
494:
490:
486:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:The Oregonian
456:
452:
448:
447:
445:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:
420:
419:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
397:
394:
387:
386:
382:
378:
377:
373:
369:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:lead sections
343:
339:
336:
329:
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:Las Vegas Sun
307:
302:
298:
295:
291:
288:
281:
280:
276:
273:
269:
265:
263:
256:
247:
243:
239:
232:
227:
226:
225:
221:
217:
216:Dr. Swag Lord
213:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
194:
193:
192:
191:
187:
183:
177:
176:
172:
169:
166:
162:
159:
155:
152:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
132:
128:
123:
119:
115:
110:
109:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
82:
80:
79:
74:
68:
65:
63:
60:
58:
55:
54:
52:
51:
46:
43:
38:
26:
19:
1107:
1071:
1024:
1015:
1002:
978:
974:
939:. media are
936:
893:. media are
890:
863:
859:
856:
830:
826:
791:
787:
754:
725:main aspects
720:
705:
702:
668:
622:
597:
590:
586:
580:
562:
561:Geller told
557:this article
546:WP:ABOUTSELF
541:
538:this article
511:
500:
493:WP:ABOUTSELF
484:
480:Sneaker News
479:
476:WP:ABOUTSELF
472:Sneaker News
471:
464:WP:ABOUTSELF
459:
451:Sneaker News
437:cited inline
428:
395:
380:
374:
371:
337:
310:
289:
275:Well-written
274:
271:
178:
167:
157:
156:
149:
145:
131:Article talk
130:
126:
107:
104:
95:Instructions
41:
32:
1044:completely.
1031:Air Jordans
897:with their
860:Illustrated
506:The phrase
306:Air Jordans
118:visual edit
986:Mikehawk10
953:Mikehawk10
915:Mikehawk10
842:Mikehawk10
805:Mikehawk10
766:Mikehawk10
733:Mikehawk10
688:Mikehawk10
677:plagiarism
647:Mikehawk10
600:Mikehawk10
518:WP:NEWSORG
455:about page
407:Mikehawk10
376:Verifiable
316:Mikehawk10
238:Mikehawk10
212:Mikehawk10
198:Mikehawk10
182:Mikehawk10
161:Mikehawk10
62:Authorship
48:GA toolbox
684:WP:EARWIG
578:and this
262:Attribute
158:Reviewer:
85:Templates
76:Reviewing
27:GA Review
1072:Pinging
941:relevant
866:such as
835:edit war
643:WP:SYNTH
531:WP:SYNTH
171:contribs
90:Criteria
1093:Mhawk10
1074:Mhawk10
801:WP:NPOV
793:Neutral
565:that...
358:fiction
141:history
122:history
108:Article
901:, and
895:tagged
868:images
831:Stable
533:issue.
497:source
485:should
453:. Its
360:, and
350:layout
1063:2. c
1010:Fixes
876:audio
874:, or
872:video
864:media
639:WP:OR
591:known
587:Vogue
583:piece
581:Vogue
540:from
527:WP:OR
499:from
379:with
258:Rate
210:Hey @
150:Watch
16:<
1097:talk
1082:talk
990:talk
957:talk
919:talk
846:talk
809:talk
770:talk
737:talk
692:talk
651:talk
604:talk
435:are
411:talk
320:talk
242:talk
220:talk
202:talk
186:talk
165:talk
137:edit
114:edit
761:).
675:or
1099:)
1084:)
1076:.
1040:b
992:)
981:.
977:.
959:)
947:.
937:6b
921:)
909:.
891:6a
878::
870:,
857:6.
848:)
829:.
811:)
790:.
772:)
755:3b
739:)
721:3a
708::
703:3.
694:)
679:.
669:2d
653:)
629:.
623:2c
606:)
598:—
431:.
429:2b
413:)
402:.
396:2a
383::
372:2.
364:.
356:,
352:,
348:,
338:1b
322:)
290:1a
277::
272:1.
244:)
222:)
204:)
188:)
173:)
139:|
120:|
116:|
1095:(
1080:(
988:(
975:7
955:(
917:(
844:(
827:5
807:(
788:4
768:(
735:(
690:(
649:(
602:(
458:(
409:(
318:(
240:(
233::
229:@
218:(
200:(
184:(
168:·
163:(
146:·
143:)
135:(
127:·
124:)
112:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.