31:
862:
little. The brothers, including
Benjamin and Reuben, all plot to kill, then sell Joseph together, they all lie to Jacob about Joseph's fate together, they all (sans Benjamin) beg for Benjamin's freedom together, and none of them necessarily accompany Jacob to Egypt specifically - as written in the script.
857:
Beyond that, the information next to each brother is largely extraneous (albeit interesting) because much of what is given is not depicted in the show. Reuben doesn't show the kindness to Joseph in the script, Levi didn't solely accompany Jacob to Egypt, Judah doesn't plead with Joseph alone and his
709:
Here is a link to the
Haymarket Theatre history. I'll leave it to others as to whether this is a sufficient source; although not precise about dates, the article does give several years. "Musicals of note were:- 'Joseph And The Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat', produced several times at the Haymarket,
608:
Does anyone remember the tour of Joseph in the 1980s? I went to see the show at
Sadlers Wells in about 1982 and saw Jess Conrad as Joseph. However, I cannot find any mention of this production anywhere, either on The Really Useful website or Sadlers Wells. It was very good and I loved the way they
522:
Another song that was cut from the score during development was "Jacob's
Journey," which was towards the beginning of the show. I've never heard of "I Don't Think I'm Wanted Back at Home Anymore." Whether it exists or not, I've edited it out because it's distracting. Most musicals have songs cut from
511:
I was sort of excited when I read this, thinking maybe I could find a version of it somewhere on the internet, or the sheet music or something, but... this page is the only page on the entire internet that mentions Joseph having a song cut from it, much less the title or any portion of the title on a
689:
Hi. The article says that this was the first production of the show in its settled form. Can you add the year when this happened? I added the 1973 production to the infobox, since that was at a West End theatre. I also did a re-org of the Lead to present the info in our usual sequence: Who wrote
668:
For the same reason, I deleted this paragraph: "David Dixon toured with the show for a 12 week run in
Singapore (ending 12 April 1998), New Zealand, and Hong Kong (summer of 1998)." It's not even mentioned in his own article, assuming that's the same person. We can't possibly list every road show of
869:
Similarly, "Three Ladies" doesn't match the script of the show and is also inaccurate. A production, or even several, may have highlighted three actresses in expanded chorus roles, but that is another example of a production decision, not a script or show design. I'd put a notation perhaps saying
853:
The order the brothers are presented in the musical is a lyrical choice. "Reuben was the eldest of the children of Isreal with Simeon and Levi the next in line. Napthali and
Issachar with Asher and Dan, Zebulum and Gad brought the total to nine... ...Benjamin and Judah, which leaves only one..."
582:
While the original production didn't contain an intermission and the production existed as a one-act musical until the late 70s, it is now almost always performed with an intermission. There is one indicated in the materials in the
American leasing company (MTI), which, for the most part, contains
250:
version has Ned
Flanders singing the part naming the myriad of colours in the coat. While the scene continues for, I'm guessing, at least forty seconds, I don't think it's a parody; listening to "Joseph's Coat" shows that they do name over thirty colours, and even repeat them. This should be looked
449:
LA and Canada have barely enough info to need a header. I was going to consolodate that section into a bulleted list, but I don't really understand the Hong Kong section. The sections seem to be giving info not only on the recordings but also on the revivals themselves which shouldn't be under the
861:
With the lead-in stating "they each have their own personalities, talents, and flaws..." implies that the descriptions given later match their characterizations in the show - this is misleading. While an individual director's interpretation might take such into account, the script calls for very
648:
I don't think there's any justification for it, really. There've been...I've no idea how many amateur productions of Joseph, certainly thousands. We can't list all of them, so how should we choose which ones to list and which ones to exclude? Better to just list major professional productions,
556:
The article mentions two London recordings but doesn't mention and significant way to distinguish them. Is there a different star than
Donovan in the second recording? is the art different? that would be a good point to include, as I can't easily find any recording other than the 1991 Donovan one
818:
I believe it may be in the order of their significance in the musical, or in "appearance" order, or in number of "lines". It's the order I found the list in in a complete cast list/description, so I kept that order. I agree that it's a little odd. Check online or in theatre programmes and see if
218:
The attempt to add "Rikki Lee
Travolta" to this article is going to need more than the link to broadwayworld, because that is only quoting gueststarcasting.com. gueststarcasting.com does not appear to be a reliable source, as they do not provide any information as to how they are deriving their
179:
Do you think it is necessary to put in a section regarding the musical requirements of performing the musical, such as the musical theory, types and numbers of instruments in the ocehstra pit etc.? I've seen a section of stuff like that on the Les Miresables musical article. Just a thought. ---
865:
Sure, that may be inaccurate for the narrative from Genesis, but the article is supposed to be accurate to the subject, which is the musical. Again, it's interesting to note those factoids about the people the characters are written about, but perhaps it's better to keep that trivia to their
690:
the show, based on what, what was it about (first paragraph); Major productions info (2nd paragraph) and "other notable info" (third paragraph). Also, we need a cite for the assertion that there have been 20,000 productions. I trimmed the paragraph, but I think it still seems a little too
476:
Should a side note be added somewhere to say that Joseph was first published by Novello in a series that included titles (of similar style but obviously of less general popularity) such The Daniel Jazz, Swingin' Samson, Adam-in-Eden, Noah and His Floating Zoo etc...? Where should this go?
583:
the show as it was performed on Bway in 1982. (At least it did. Ten years ago. Damn, I'm old.) If they've updated it with the '91 revival version, that one still had an intermission. Anyway, I'm just asking to leave the plot and the songs separated into acts. Whether or not
766:
The Osmond DVD has some history of the musical. I think I have it somewhere, but if someone else does too they can look. (It's rather maddening that the very complicated history of the development of this musical is scattered piecemeal in more than a dozen different places LOL.)
854:
Listing them in birth order would be necessary in an article about their lineage in the Bible, but not a character listing for a show. However, it hurts nothing to do so here too. I am merely pointing out why the birth order was probably not followed initially.
782:
I don't have it after all -- must have rented it. In any case, I don't know that it has more info than the official sites (it was released in 2000). But if anyone has it it might be worth checking. The info is in a series of clickable pages of text on the DVD.
533:
I think there's good grounds for keeping in the reference to "I Don't Think I'm Wanted Back At Home," since although doesn't appear on soundtrack releases, it does show up from time to time in touring productions. However, it seems from Rice's online CV
434:
Every source I've seen lists this as 1993 LA recording. Besides which, if it were a NYC recording, I'd think the proper billing would be 1993 Broadway? anyone have any reason to believe this isn't LA? I'm reverting it in the meantime
151:
In addition, Potiphar and Potiphar's wife have several spoken lines in the scene Potiphar. I propose that we change the line "there is no spoken dialogue" to "there is little spoken dialogue." Stronghold1245 02:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
414:
The timeline and structuring of the article has become a bit of a mess, with important information missing from the body text even though it is in the lede. I don't have time at the moment to fix this, so I'm making a note here.
618:
Saw a tour in late 1990s that starred John Travolta's nephew Rikki Lee Travolta. It was pretty good. I thought Sam Harris and Donny Osmond split most Joseph touring duties in the 1980s. I'm not familiar with Jess Conrad.
944:
78:, the film color process. Was it simply used to add spark to the title? This article is linked at the top of Technicolor, so it would be good to describe the relationship, even if it was simply a naming choice. --
460:
I too was confused by the Hong Kong "recording". I think it should be removed as it doesn't state an "official" recording, only a revival show (in which case, I could list two that I've been to this year!)
512:
webpage. Did someone just make this up? Should it be removed from the article considering this article is the only place that it can be found (besides answers.com which is an exact copy of the article)?
710:
in 1974, 1975, 1976, 1978, and 1985. This became a great favourite with audiences and was developed at the Haymarket from it's first shorter schools version into the full blown musical we know today."
850:
The order of the brothers' births is not really relevant to the article, nor is much of the biographical information listed next to them. The article is about the musical, not the Biblical people.
945:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110629165814/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/93562-Patrick-Cassidy-and-American-Idol-Starlet-Tour-with-Joseph-and-the-Amazing-Technicolor-Dreamcoat
835:
PS: I just checked a theatre programme I have, and the brothers are listed exactly as they are in the article. So I'm assuming this is the standard credit order for listing them.
142:
The article states that there is no spoken dialogue. This is not true - there are a few lines spoken by Joseph. They could be cut completely, yes, but they are there nonetheless.
638:
Can we figure out some kind of policy about whether amateur productions (e.g. schools) should go in? People keep adding their school's production and it keeps getting deleted.
948:
954:
47:
17:
523:
them during the course of development, and we would be cluttering every article about a musical if we were to include all the songs that are no longer a part of it.--
1012:
1008:
994:
873:
I just think we should refocus the article to be more in-line with its subject matter. I'm just not goig to do an unannounced, mass edit out of the blue either.
113:
Attempted fratricide and selling people into slavery is not what I would call "family-friendly". Or is that merely used as codeword for "biblically inspired"Â ?
898:
538:) that it was actually written for another show called "Jacob's Journey", which was originally intended as a prologue to Joseph but was cut (details here:
228:
I will continue to remove the link which claims that "Travolta" is a celebrity until such time as someone provides proof that gueststarcasting.com is a
363:
I have a feeling this refers to the two BAM productions in 1976 and 1977, now mentioned at the end of that section. Should we just delete this phrase?
270:
I'm not trying to be defensive or anything, but could someone possibly give me a reason as to why having the colors of the coat in the article is bad?
694:. The paragraph really could be moved to the end of the productions section, leaving just the info that it is frequently performed in the Lead. --
480:
232:. The link still calls "Travolta" a member of a famous celebrity family, which is blatantly false, and has been proven repeatedly to be false.
964:
949:
http://www.playbill.com/news/article/93562-Patrick-Cassidy-and-American-Idol-Starlet-Tour-with-Joseph-and-the-Amazing-Technicolor-Dreamcoat
803:
Is there a reason for the order of the other eleven brothers under the list of characters? I would think they should be in order of birth.
311:
296:
271:
167:
924:
914:
955:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110703030931/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/theatre/review-23404767-a-heavenly-triumph-of-kitsch-and-camp.do
934:
339:
123:
970:
990:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
958:
567:
AFAIK there was only one London soundtrack release off the back of the 1991 revival. I've amended that section accordingly.
492:
1060:
884:
844:
828:
812:
792:
776:
753:
737:
721:
703:
678:
661:
642:
628:
613:
598:
571:
561:
546:
527:
516:
496:
465:
454:
439:
424:
401:
387:
372:
347:
319:
301:
279:
260:
236:
223:
207:
184:
146:
131:
108:
93:
82:
858:
ancestry to Jesus is not mentioned, Zebulum's sons are never mentioned, and none of their mothers are named in the show.
1055:
587:
production contained an intermission, this is how they are considered by the authors. Or, at least, the producers. —
980:
256:
38:
880:
219:
numbers, and their front page touts the Joseph information as just about the only thing they are talking about.
1011:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
593:
315:
291:
275:
163:
965:
http://www.theatermania.com/london/news/04-2010/keith-jack-to-join-uk-joseph-and-the-amazing-techn_26473.html
343:
1046:
906:
127:
624:
840:
824:
788:
772:
749:
717:
674:
420:
397:
383:
368:
252:
203:
649:
IMO. As it is, the section under which people seem to be listing amateur productions is the section for
588:
286:
143:
105:
1030:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1018:
332:
Could something be put in that according to the song the colors are (even if put in another order....)
925:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081225062752/http://www.reallyuseful.com/shows/joseph/history-inspiration
915:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081225062752/http://www.reallyuseful.com/shows/joseph/history-inspiration
905:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
609:
displayed the Dreamcoat at the end with the brothers unrolling the panels until they filled the stage.
935:
https://web.archive.org/web/20111001165428/http://www.davidcassidyfansite.com/TheatrePages/Joseph.html
620:
876:
335:
155:
119:
79:
971:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140101150509/http://www.josephthemusical.com/the-show/musical-numbers/
610:
484:
159:
89:
733:
699:
513:
488:
233:
220:
181:
1015:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1031:
928:
918:
539:
959:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/theatre/review-23404767-a-heavenly-triumph-of-kitsch-and-camp.do
836:
820:
808:
784:
768:
745:
713:
691:
670:
658:
568:
543:
416:
393:
379:
364:
199:
974:
1038:
104:
This article should be more SYNOPTIC, and far less biographical! It needs to be cleaned up.
938:
997:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1037:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
729:
695:
639:
462:
981:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080120003156/http://www.stageagent.com/Shows/View/701
804:
558:
557:
with the cover that was then standardized like the LA and (white) Canadian albums.
524:
451:
436:
229:
1004:
75:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1003:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
509:
I Don't Think I'm Wanted Back At Home Anymore (cut following 1973 London run)
984:
866:
individual articles instead of seemingly padding the word count here.
410:
The timeline and structuring of the article has become a bit of a mess
285:
Because they are the lyrics to a song and, thus, under copyright. —
198:
OK, whoever you are, I've added a character section to the article.
535:
392:
OK, thanks! (Had to leave the computer for a while, just returned).
25:
929:
http://www.reallyuseful.com/shows/joseph/history-inspiration
919:
http://www.reallyuseful.com/shows/joseph/history-inspiration
540:
http://www.reallyuseful.com/rug/shows/joseph/inspiration.htm
359:"two professional productions in New York" (1970s; uncited)
909:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
975:
http://www.josephthemusical.com/the-show/musical-numbers/
939:
http://davidcassidyfansite.com/TheatrePages/Joseph.html
902:
744:
I do not know where the 20,000 productions comes from.
74:
I'm not sure what (if any) relationship there is to
1007:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
669:the musical -- there have been hundreds of them.
18:Talk:Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat
870:"in some productions" to keep it more on point.
819:other cast descriptions list them differently.
116:There is no sex, drugs, alcohol, or violence.
993:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
899:Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat
897:I have just modified 8 external links on
985:http://www.stageagent.com/Shows/View/701
88:It's just a reference to the colours.~~
657:doesn't really belong there anyway...
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
799:Reason for the order of the brothers?
7:
685:Haymarket, Leicester; re-org of Lead
653:, so information on performances
24:
901:. Please take a moment to review
194:because they do play a good part
762:Osmond DVD has some history info
536:http://www.timrice.co.uk/cv.html
29:
963:Corrected formatting/usage for
562:21:17, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
455:21:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
845:03:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
829:05:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
813:21:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
348:20:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
320:13:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
302:19:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
280:19:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
185:05:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
132:21:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
92:~~I r needing userboxes plz!
679:13:13, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
629:20:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
466:00:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
440:08:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
208:12:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
190:no mention of the characters
1076:
1061:20:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
1024:(last update: 5 June 2024)
894:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
793:02:30, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
777:07:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
754:00:28, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
738:18:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
722:00:28, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
704:00:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
634:Amateur productions policy
497:23:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
402:20:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
388:20:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
373:17:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
261:04:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
237:18:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
224:22:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
147:21:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
109:06:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
885:15:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
425:04:40, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
94:11:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
83:03:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
662:20:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
643:17:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
614:08:20, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
599:09:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
528:11:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
890:External links modified
572:05:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
547:05:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
517:18:40, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
472:"Novello Pop Cantatas"
483:comment was added by
42:of past discussions.
1005:regular verification
995:After February 2018
445:Recordings section?
175:Musical Requirement
1049:InternetArchiveBot
1000:InternetArchiveBot
552:London Recordings?
450:recording header.
1025:
500:
350:
338:comment added by
253:Andrei Iosifovich
242:Simpsons: Parody?
171:
158:comment added by
122:comment added by
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1067:
1059:
1050:
1023:
1022:
1001:
596:
591:
478:
333:
310:Oh yeah. Sorry.
299:
294:
289:
251:into I suppose.
153:
134:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1053:
1048:
1016:
1009:have permission
999:
907:this simple FaQ
892:
877:Medleystudios72
801:
764:
687:
636:
606:
594:
589:
580:
554:
506:
504:Musical Numbers
479:—The preceding
474:
447:
432:
412:
361:
297:
292:
287:
268:
244:
230:reliable source
216:
192:
177:
140:
138:Spoken Dialogue
117:
102:
80:Jeffrey Sharkey
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1073:
1071:
1043:
1042:
1035:
988:
987:
979:Added archive
977:
969:Added archive
967:
961:
953:Added archive
951:
943:Added archive
941:
933:Added archive
931:
923:Added archive
921:
913:Added archive
891:
888:
848:
847:
832:
831:
800:
797:
796:
795:
763:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
742:
741:
740:
686:
683:
682:
681:
665:
664:
635:
632:
605:
602:
579:
576:
575:
574:
553:
550:
531:
530:
505:
502:
473:
470:
469:
468:
446:
443:
431:
428:
411:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
360:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
325:
324:
323:
322:
312:69.124.137.249
305:
304:
272:69.124.137.249
267:
264:
243:
240:
215:
212:
211:
210:
191:
188:
176:
173:
160:Stronghold1245
144:76.179.235.134
139:
136:
106:172.191.10.230
101:
98:
97:
96:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1072:
1063:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1051:
1040:
1036:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1020:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
996:
991:
986:
982:
978:
976:
972:
968:
966:
962:
960:
956:
952:
950:
946:
942:
940:
936:
932:
930:
926:
922:
920:
916:
912:
911:
910:
908:
904:
900:
895:
889:
887:
886:
882:
878:
874:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:
830:
826:
822:
817:
816:
815:
814:
810:
806:
798:
794:
790:
786:
781:
780:
779:
778:
774:
770:
761:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
719:
715:
711:
708:
707:
706:
705:
701:
697:
693:
684:
680:
676:
672:
667:
666:
663:
660:
656:
652:
647:
646:
645:
644:
641:
633:
631:
630:
626:
622:
616:
615:
612:
603:
601:
600:
597:
592:
586:
578:Intermissions
577:
573:
570:
566:
565:
564:
563:
560:
551:
549:
548:
545:
541:
537:
529:
526:
521:
520:
519:
518:
515:
514:EgyptianSushi
510:
503:
501:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
471:
467:
464:
459:
458:
457:
456:
453:
444:
442:
441:
438:
429:
427:
426:
422:
418:
409:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:
375:
374:
370:
366:
358:
349:
345:
341:
340:132.170.46.82
337:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
303:
300:
295:
290:
284:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
265:
263:
262:
258:
254:
249:
241:
239:
238:
235:
234:Corvus cornix
231:
226:
225:
222:
221:Corvus cornix
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:
195:
189:
187:
186:
183:
182:Jedd the Jedi
174:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
149:
148:
145:
137:
135:
133:
129:
125:
124:69.197.93.110
121:
114:
111:
110:
107:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:
85:
84:
81:
77:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1047:
1044:
1019:source check
998:
992:
989:
896:
893:
875:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
849:
837:Softlavender
821:Softlavender
802:
785:Softlavender
769:Softlavender
765:
746:JeanColumbia
728:Thanks! --
714:JeanColumbia
688:
671:Softlavender
659:David Brider
654:
650:
637:
617:
607:
584:
581:
569:David Brider
555:
544:David Brider
532:
508:
507:
475:
448:
433:
417:Softlavender
413:
394:JeanColumbia
380:Softlavender
365:Softlavender
362:
269:
247:
245:
227:
217:
200:Softlavender
193:
178:
150:
141:
118:— Preceding
115:
112:
103:
73:
60:
43:
37:
692:WP:PEACOCKy
621:GreenGobott
334:—Preceding
154:—Preceding
76:Technicolor
70:Technicolor
36:This is an
1056:Report bug
651:recordings
266:The Colors
214:"Travolta"
1039:this tool
1032:this tool
604:1980 tour
61:Archive 1
1045:Cheers.—
730:Ssilvers
696:Ssilvers
640:Marnanel
611:Oyster24
493:contribs
485:Jchurch1
481:unsigned
463:JGXenite
336:unsigned
248:Simpsons
168:contribs
156:unsigned
120:unsigned
100:Synoptic
903:my edit
805:Tressif
559:TheHYPO
525:Cassmus
452:TheHYPO
437:TheHYPO
90:Lazyguy
39:archive
655:per se
378:Done.
595:Maker
590:Music
430:1993?
293:Maker
288:Music
16:<
881:talk
841:talk
825:talk
809:talk
789:talk
773:talk
750:talk
734:talk
718:talk
700:talk
675:talk
625:talk
585:your
542:).
489:talk
421:talk
398:talk
384:talk
369:talk
344:talk
316:talk
298:5376
276:talk
257:talk
246:The
204:talk
164:talk
128:talk
1013:RfC
983:to
973:to
957:to
947:to
937:to
927:to
917:to
1026:.
1021:}}
1017:{{
883:)
843:)
827:)
811:)
791:)
775:)
752:)
736:)
720:)
712:].
702:)
677:)
627:)
495:)
491:•
423:)
400:)
386:)
371:)
346:)
318:)
278:)
259:)
206:)
170:)
166:•
130:)
1058:)
1054:(
1041:.
1034:.
879:(
839:(
823:(
807:(
787:(
771:(
748:(
732:(
716:(
698:(
673:(
623:(
534:(
499:.
487:(
419:(
396:(
382:(
367:(
342:(
314:(
274:(
255:(
202:(
162:(
126:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.