Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Japanese battleship Shikishima/GA1

Source 📝

408: 760: 720: 696: 686: 651: 620: 610: 575: 565: 533: 519: 509: 471: 457: 420: 396: 384: 710: 42: 305:
No worries, please let me know how you get on. I will keep the review open for a bit longer. If you don't get any response in the next couple of days, I'm happy to close as successful, but with the understanding that you will sort out the remaining issue prior to ACR or FAC. Cheers,
324:
The uploader has added the source for this, although he failed to provide a date of publication, which I've requested. However, I recognize the series that it was published in, which began in the 1970s, so it probably meets the Japanese PD requirements
287:
This one's more problematic and may need to be pulled until the uploader provides the missing information. I've pinged both uploaders in hopes of getting the missing information added. Thanks for the review.--
47: 126: 122: 107: 80: 52: 99: 70: 237:
It does, although I think that it's OK otherwise for use as it's pretty clearly published before 1956 and photographed before she was disarmed in 1923.--
209:
this seems inconsistent: "six 37-millimetre (1.5 in) 2.5-pounder Hotchkiss guns" (in the body) v "4 × 1 – 2.5-pounder Hotchkiss guns" (in the infobox);
156: 115: 17: 702: 213:
Perhaps, "The Russian battleship sank in less than two minutes after one of her magazines exploded; Makarov was one of the 677 killed."
75: 525: 413: 212:"The Russian battleship sank in less than two minutes after one of her magazines exploded, Makarov one of the 677 killed." --: --> 206:
this seems inconsistent: "six 47-millimetre (1.9 in) 3-pounder guns" (in the body) v "8 × 1 – 3-pounder guns" (in the infobox);
92: 430: 203:
as above: "normally displaced 14,850 long tons (15,090 t)" (in body) v "Displacement: 14,312 long tons (14,542 t) (normal)";
197:
this seems inconsistent: "had a beam of 75 feet 6 inches (23.0 m)" (in body) v. "Beam: 76 ft (23.164800 m)" (in infobox);
662:
Article is stable. There has been recent work, but it has been focused upon building towards taking the article to GAN.
463: 376: 251:
A source has been added for this now, so it looks fine now, I think. At ACR and FAC, it might need a US tag, though.
348: 311: 274: 256: 178: 150: 495: 269:"File:HIJMS Shikishima.jpg": I think this probably needs a date of publication on the image description page. 330: 292: 242: 344: 307: 270: 252: 174: 146: 544:
No issues in this regard. The article uses good quality sources and provides citations for all facts.
389: 223:
Its seems that I was a bit too liberal with the copy-paste routine for this article; all fixed now.
672: 352: 334: 315: 296: 278: 260: 246: 182: 160: 326: 288: 238: 200:
as above: "full-load draught of 27 feet 3 inches (8.3 m)" (in body) v. "Draught: 26 ft (7.9 m)";
595: 166: 401: 170: 193:"the ship fought in the Battles of Port Arthur, of the Yellow Sea and Tsushima" --: --> 343:
No worries, I think that should be fine. Thanks for dealing with that. Regards,
194:"the ship fought in the Battles of Port Arthur, the Yellow Sea and Tsushima" 715:
public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain
216:
inconsistent: "Fukio, p. 54" (in Footnotes) v . "Fukui" (in References);
429:
Images lack alt text, but it is not a requirement (only a suggestion):
234:"File:HIJMS Shikishima-1920s.jpg": I think this needs a source; 134: 103: 165:I shall be reviewing this article against the 8: 676:, where possible, to illustrate the topic. 30: 586:Good coverage without unnecessary detail. 691:(Is illustrated with appropriate images) 631:No issues in this regard that I can see. 482:Looks good, all issues above dealt with. 61: 33: 7: 731:Generally fine, see comments above. 18:Talk:Japanese battleship Shikishima 24: 758: 718: 708: 694: 684: 649: 618: 608: 573: 563: 531: 517: 507: 469: 455: 418: 406: 394: 382: 709: 514:(citations to reliable sources) 353:07:35, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 335:01:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 316:00:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 297:16:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 279:09:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 261:00:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 247:16:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 183:05:40, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 161:05:40, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 759: 719: 695: 685: 650: 619: 609: 574: 564: 532: 518: 508: 470: 456: 419: 407: 395: 383: 188:Generic comments/suggestions 779: 173:for Good Article status. 615:(all significant views) 445:reasonably well written 701:(non-free images have 681:(tagged and captioned) 605:(fair representation) 596:neutral point of view 553:broad in its coverage 167:Good Article criteria 703:fair use rationales 491:factually accurate 646:No edit wars etc. 89: 88: 770: 762: 761: 722: 721: 712: 711: 698: 697: 688: 687: 653: 652: 622: 621: 612: 611: 577: 576: 567: 566: 535: 534: 521: 520: 511: 510: 473: 472: 459: 458: 422: 421: 410: 409: 398: 397: 386: 385: 369:Technical review 345:AustralianRupert 308:AustralianRupert 271:AustralianRupert 253:AustralianRupert 175:AustralianRupert 169:, following its 147:AustralianRupert 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 778: 777: 773: 772: 771: 769: 768: 767: 593:It follows the 560:(major aspects) 377:Disambiguations 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 776: 774: 766: 765: 764: 763: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 733: 732: 726: 725: 724: 723: 666: 665: 664: 663: 657: 656: 655: 654: 635: 634: 633: 632: 626: 625: 624: 623: 590: 589: 588: 587: 581: 580: 579: 578: 548: 547: 546: 545: 539: 538: 537: 536: 486: 485: 484: 483: 477: 476: 475: 474: 440: 439: 435: 434: 433: 432: 424: 423: 371: 370: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 338: 337: 319: 318: 300: 299: 282: 281: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 229: 228: 227: 226: 225: 224: 218: 217: 214: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 189: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 775: 756: 752: 751: 749: 746: 745: 737: 736: 735: 734: 730: 729: 728: 727: 716: 706: 704: 692: 682: 678: 677: 675: 674: 668: 667: 661: 660: 659: 658: 647: 644: 643: 641: 637: 636: 630: 629: 628: 627: 616: 606: 602: 601: 599: 597: 592: 591: 585: 584: 583: 582: 571: 561: 557: 556: 554: 550: 549: 543: 542: 541: 540: 529: 527: 515: 505: 501: 500: 498: 497: 492: 488: 487: 481: 480: 479: 478: 467: 465: 453: 449: 448: 446: 442: 441: 437: 436: 431: 428: 427: 426: 425: 416: 415: 404: 403: 392: 391: 380: 378: 373: 372: 368: 367: 354: 350: 346: 342: 341: 340: 339: 336: 332: 328: 327:Sturmvogel 66 323: 322: 321: 320: 317: 313: 309: 304: 303: 302: 301: 298: 294: 290: 289:Sturmvogel 66 286: 285: 284: 283: 280: 276: 272: 268: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249: 248: 244: 240: 239:Sturmvogel 66 236: 235: 233: 232: 231: 230: 222: 221: 220: 219: 215: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 192: 191: 190: 187: 186: 185: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 754: 747: 714: 700: 690: 680: 670: 645: 639: 614: 604: 594: 569: 559: 552: 523: 513: 504:(references) 503: 494: 490: 461: 451: 444: 412: 400: 388: 375: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 104:visual edit 738:Fixed now. 496:verifiable 171:nomination 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 755:Pass/Fail 671:contains 570:(focused) 414:Copyright 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 438:Criteria 402:Alt text 157:contribs 76:Criteria 748:Overall 452:(prose) 390:Linkrot 127:history 108:history 94:Article 673:images 640:stable 638:It is 598:policy 551:It is 489:It is 443:It is 325:now.-- 136:Watch 16:< 493:and 349:talk 331:talk 312:talk 293:talk 275:talk 257:talk 243:talk 179:talk 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 669:It 464:MoS 411:d ( 399:c ( 387:b ( 374:a ( 757:: 753:a 750:: 717:: 713:d 707:: 699:c 693:: 689:b 683:: 679:a 648:: 642:. 617:: 613:b 607:: 603:a 600:. 572:: 568:b 562:: 558:a 555:. 530:: 526:OR 522:c 516:: 512:b 506:: 502:a 499:. 468:: 460:b 454:: 450:a 447:. 417:) 405:) 393:) 381:: 351:) 333:) 314:) 295:) 277:) 259:) 245:) 181:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 705:) 528:) 524:( 466:) 462:( 379:) 347:( 329:( 310:( 291:( 273:( 255:( 241:( 177:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Japanese battleship Shikishima
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
AustralianRupert
talk
contribs
05:40, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Good Article criteria
nomination
AustralianRupert
talk
05:40, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Sturmvogel 66
talk
16:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
AustralianRupert
talk
00:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.