116:
to pinpoint the location of the wreckage, and likewise the time she went down. This is awfully, and all-too reminiscent of that event. I'll bet it was a
Russian "boomer." Remember that they lost the "Kursk the following year in the Barents Sea, and they were highly secretive about it. It wouldn't have been a US, or a British sub because you would have too many families who lost a loved one, who would talk to the media. But the Russians would keep such families away from the international press, and especially away from the U.S. Media.
21:
55:
115:
Don't know why it's called "Julia." But, it sounds to me like somebody lost a submarine. That's how the U.S. Navy found "The
Scorpion" when she sank in 1968. They listened to the SOSUS network of undersea microphones until they found the sound of an explosion and/or seismic event. They were then able
142:
The article says the "source of the sound was most likely a large iceberg that had run aground off
Antarctica," and also that "its origin was in the equatorial Pacific Ocean at approximately 15° S 98° W."
65:
181:
Hello, some clever person has put the text '9/11 was an inside job' in the sound for this article, I don't know how to remove it s can someone please do it?
188:
147:
123:
102:
223:
although it is not mentioned as a ruled out possibilities, i would like to mention that this sounds a great deal like humpback whales.
239:
40:
on 8 June 2010 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see
61:
82:
71:
37:
92:
151:
127:
81:
This article appears to have been resurrected after the merge. Was this intentional? All of the other items on
192:
106:
235:
227:
184:
119:
88:
231:
208:
54:
33:
166:
146:
These two pieces of information contradict each other. 15° S latitude is nowhere near
Antarctica.
203:
Good catch. Someone added the spurious text using the "closed caption" function. Removed it. -
204:
85:
have their own articles. Why was this one originally merged if none of the others were?
243:
212:
196:
170:
162:
155:
131:
110:
96:
161:
The point of orgin was inaccurately reported. I have fixed it.
49:
15:
41:
28:
8:
7:
138:Contradiction needing to be resolved
64:on 28 May 2010 (UTC). The result of
14:
53:
19:
60:This article was nominated for
1:
156:21:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
132:16:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
261:
244:03:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
111:03:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
83:List of unexplained sounds
72:List of unexplained sounds
38:List of unexplained sounds
29:Julia (unidentified sound)
213:21:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
197:20:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
101:Why is it called Julia??
97:15:02, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
171:11:27, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
26:The contents of the
247:
230:comment added by
187:comment added by
122:comment added by
79:
78:
48:
47:
252:
246:
224:
199:
134:
89:Radicaledward101
57:
50:
31:
23:
22:
16:
260:
259:
255:
254:
253:
251:
250:
249:
225:
221:
182:
179:
140:
117:
27:
20:
12:
11:
5:
258:
256:
220:
217:
216:
215:
189:92.237.254.219
178:
175:
174:
173:
148:199.46.245.231
139:
136:
124:167.206.169.66
103:98.202.240.193
77:
76:
66:the discussion
58:
46:
45:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
257:
248:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
201:
200:
198:
194:
190:
186:
177:Video Message
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
159:
158:
157:
153:
149:
144:
137:
135:
133:
129:
125:
121:
113:
112:
108:
104:
99:
98:
94:
90:
86:
84:
74:
73:
67:
63:
59:
56:
52:
51:
43:
39:
35:
30:
25:
18:
17:
232:Bombermanpyr
226:— Preceding
222:
183:— Preceding
180:
145:
141:
118:— Preceding
114:
100:
87:
80:
69:
42:its history
205:LuckyLouie
32:page were
163:Sulfurboy
70:merge to
240:contribs
228:unsigned
185:unsigned
120:unsigned
62:deletion
219:Whales
34:merged
36:into
236:talk
209:talk
193:talk
167:talk
152:talk
128:talk
107:talk
93:talk
68:was
242:)
238:•
211:)
195:)
169:)
154:)
130:)
109:)
95:)
234:(
207:(
191:(
165:(
150:(
126:(
105:(
91:(
75:.
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
