113:
92:
61:
252:
justification for removing the reference. Whether or not Ribes is a credible source is a separate question, and I would add that under most circumstances such original research as Ribes' should not be used as source material on
Knowledge. I invite discussion about those two points here, but since neither were given as arguments for removing the reference, I will reinstate it for now.
433:
sufficient to meet
Knowledge's standards of notability, and even if they were, neither data collection website is reliable, as Sylvain Ribes has persuasively argued, and as journalists at Bloomberg and Forbes and editors and at least one admin on Knowledge have affirmed. Unless someone can produce better evidence for OKEx's notability as a cryptocurrency exchange, I will nominate "
32:
432:
Evidence of notability must be verifiable for a topic to have its own
Knowledge page. The only notable characteristics of OKEx are its consistently high rankings in trading volume and markets served on the two data collection sites CoinMarketCap.com and LiveCoinWatch.com. But statistical data are not
386:
I would reinstate paragraph 2 because the sourcing in it was good enough and the information in it was noteworthy to a reader with general interest in the exchange. Forbes' journalism is good enough, and its staff writer's reference to Ribes' blog post on Medium.com makes the post credible enough for
230:
to the same
Sylvain Ribes article for medium.com, "Chasing fake volume: a crypto-plague". The truncated sentence now ends with a comma, suggesting it was accidental, and the edit comment says simply, "Made minor introduction changes", suggesting the editor did not intend to delete the reference.
536:
Hello, I have gone through the general sanction prevailing over the topic concerned where I have edited. Thanks much for pointing out and letting me know. I was unaware of the same. Can I go ahead with the necessary remedies to my previous edit while pruning the bad resources and the associated
251:
to Ribes' study with the remark that "medium is not a good source for that reference", "medium" being Medium.com, the blogging platform on which
Sylvain Ribes published his data and analysis. Because OKEx publishes its own blog on medium.com, it would appear that OKEx itself disagrees with that
444:
The same standard holds for any other cryptocurrency exchange that has its own article in
Knowledge until sources more reliable than CoinMarketCap.com and LiveCoinWatch.com can be established. Until then, the only secure place in Knowledge for any cryptocurrency exchange should be on a list of
391:
by proxy. But if reinstating Ribes' critical findings, I would balance them with OKEx's notably (and verifiably) high position on two prominent exchange lists, those at coinmarketcap.com and livecoinwatch.com, and those only because they are mentioned by Ribes and I don't know any others.
203:
that puts in doubt the self-reported trading volumes of OKEx and other crypto currency exchanges. The user gave no explanation for the removal. In the next 48 hours I intend to reinstate that reference, and I invite subsequent discussion of the topic here.
505:
You added many unacceptable sources such as coindesk, theblockcrypto and other cryptocurrency-advocating sites, blogs, press releases. Too many to remove one by one and consider which statements would be unsupported without them.
489:
I have been waiting for someone to review or share their suggestions. But, seems the article is in good shape now with notability issue and authoritative source issues being addressed . Thus removing both the tags.
300:" introduced on 16 May 2018 were copy-pasted from the "About Us" page of the company's official site. That editor failed to note the company as the source. This suggests abuse of Knowledge as a promotional tool via
163:
566:
153:
561:
453:
571:
348:
346:
129:
537:
statements that can not be established independently from the sources acceptable under this sanction and
Knowledge citation policy? Thanks much. --
338:
120:
97:
42:
406:
I reinstated some content from the second paragraph, adding
Bloomberg.com as a source in case Forbes.com is not considered reliable.
438:
342:
200:
72:
350:
449:
38:
60:
377:
363:
328:
542:
525:
495:
480:
78:
461:
411:
397:
309:
281:
257:
236:
209:
31:
520:
Thanks for your input. Will revise the issues pointed by you and will come back to you. Thanks. --
192:
128:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
511:
373:
359:
324:
538:
521:
491:
476:
457:
407:
393:
305:
297:
277:
253:
232:
205:
475:
I have updated the page with latest resources. Inviting for reviews and suggestions. --
125:
555:
507:
301:
112:
91:
17:
323:
Two RSes in the whole thing. What coverage is there that isn't crypto blogs? -
231:
Presuming the deletion was an accident, I'll reinstate the reference for now.
448:
For further reading on the topic of deletion at
Knowledge, please review
358:
We can cut it down to just those, though then it'll be quite short ... -
181:
On the question of OKEx fabricating its self-reported trading volumes
245:
On August 9, 2018, an editor acting under a new Knowledge account
434:
388:
304:. Be wary of suspicious changes to this article in the future.
54:
26:
272:
article to the "OKEx" references that cites Ribes' analysis.
546:
529:
515:
499:
484:
465:
415:
401:
381:
367:
353:
332:
313:
285:
261:
240:
213:
247:
226:
187:
124:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
567:Low-importance WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
454:Knowledge:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)
224:On June 7, an editor at IP address 202.130.102.26
562:Start-Class WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
296:I realized today that substantial changes to "
8:
58:
428:Knowledge article "OKEx" should be deleted
86:
88:
7:
138:Knowledge:WikiProject Cryptocurrency
118:This article is within the scope of
572:WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
372:It's been a week, culled sources -
144:WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
141:Template:WikiProject Cryptocurrency
77:It is of interest to the following
276:is a credible third-party source.
25:
41:on 29 August 2020. The result of
292:Single-purpose account activity?
111:
90:
59:
30:
439:Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion
158:This article has been rated as
37:This article was nominated for
201:a credible preliminary inquiry
1:
368:11:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
354:18:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
333:14:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
195:dated 16 May 2018 and marked
132:and see a list of open tasks.
466:19:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
437:" for deletion according to
416:00:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
402:17:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
382:17:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
345:, and two more in Bloomberg
286:00:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
262:22:12, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
588:
445:cryptocurrency exchanges.
121:WikiProject Cryptocurrency
547:02:59, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
530:06:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
516:06:42, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
500:06:08, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
485:09:56, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
450:Knowledge:Deletion_policy
241:21:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
157:
106:
85:
314:08:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
214:01:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
302:single-purpose accounts
67:This article is rated
248:removed the reference
227:deleted the reference
199:removed reference to
319:Sourcing is not good
219:Threaded discussion
452:and in particular
73:content assessment
18:Talk:OKX (company)
178:
177:
174:
173:
170:
169:
53:
52:
16:(Redirected from
579:
471:Update This Page
250:
229:
190:
164:importance scale
146:
145:
142:
139:
136:
115:
108:
107:
102:
94:
87:
70:
64:
63:
55:
47:speedy withdrawn
34:
27:
21:
587:
586:
582:
581:
580:
578:
577:
576:
552:
551:
473:
430:
321:
294:
268:I just added a
246:
225:
221:
186:
183:
143:
140:
137:
134:
133:
100:
71:on Knowledge's
68:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
585:
583:
575:
574:
569:
564:
554:
553:
550:
549:
533:
532:
518:
472:
469:
429:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
404:
320:
317:
293:
290:
289:
288:
265:
264:
243:
220:
217:
182:
179:
176:
175:
172:
171:
168:
167:
160:Low-importance
156:
150:
149:
147:
135:Cryptocurrency
130:the discussion
126:cryptocurrency
116:
104:
103:
101:Low‑importance
98:Cryptocurrency
95:
83:
82:
76:
65:
51:
50:
43:the discussion
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
584:
573:
570:
568:
565:
563:
560:
559:
557:
548:
544:
540:
535:
534:
531:
527:
523:
519:
517:
513:
509:
504:
503:
502:
501:
497:
493:
487:
486:
482:
478:
470:
468:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
446:
442:
440:
436:
427:
417:
413:
409:
405:
403:
399:
395:
390:
385:
384:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
369:
365:
361:
357:
356:
355:
352:
349:
347:
344:
340:
337:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
318:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
263:
259:
255:
249:
244:
242:
238:
234:
228:
223:
222:
218:
216:
215:
211:
207:
202:
198:
194:
189:
180:
165:
161:
155:
152:
151:
148:
131:
127:
123:
122:
117:
114:
110:
109:
105:
99:
96:
93:
89:
84:
80:
74:
66:
62:
57:
56:
48:
44:
40:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
488:
474:
447:
443:
431:
374:David Gerard
360:David Gerard
325:David Gerard
322:
295:
273:
269:
196:
184:
159:
119:
79:WikiProjects
46:
539:Harryishere
522:Harryishere
492:Harryishere
477:Harryishere
69:Start-class
556:Categories
458:Adelphious
408:Adelphious
394:Adelphious
343:Asia Times
306:Adelphious
278:Adelphious
254:Adelphious
233:Adelphious
206:Adelphious
508:Retimuko
39:deletion
193:Jovan92
162:on the
274:Forbes
270:Forbes
75:scale.
197:minor
543:talk
526:talk
512:talk
496:talk
481:talk
462:talk
435:OKEx
412:talk
398:talk
389:OKEx
378:talk
364:talk
329:talk
310:talk
298:OKEx
282:talk
258:talk
237:talk
210:talk
188:edit
45:was
339:WSJ
191:by
185:An
154:Low
558::
545:)
528:)
514:)
498:)
490:--
483:)
464:)
456:.
441:.
414:)
400:)
380:)
366:)
341:,
331:)
312:)
284:)
260:)
239:)
212:)
541:(
524:(
510:(
494:(
479:(
460:(
410:(
396:(
376:(
362:(
351:Џ
327:(
308:(
280:(
256:(
235:(
208:(
166:.
81::
49:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
