372:
find and point out. I don't doubt that
AgnosticPreachersKid can make the necessary changes if they're noted, but they need to be listed. The second Design paragraph starts with "The tower projects"—what exactly does this mean?—and would seem to contradict the source, which says "In plan, the tower does not project from the building." The sentence in the penultimate 21st century paragraph,
445:, I know you're trying to help, but as previously stated, maybe you should hold off on reviewing GA nominations for now. Maybe ask an experienced reviewer if s/he can assist you with a future nomination to gain experience? I'll try to work on the article tomorrow. I've been very busy in real life this week (and this weekend) so please excuse the delay.
42:
218:
371:
The third sentence (now the second sentence after revisions) hasn't been changed in the slightest, though the nominator did good work on the rest of the paragraph. The "stall" wording has improved somewhat, but it's still not quite there. And there are other grammatical errors that any review should
411:
It's most unfortunate, but your entire statement shows why you should not be reviewing these nominations. You knew that a section "has some problems", yet you promoted it despite criteria that clearly say otherwise. You state that hyphens should not be used in "19th-century public markets" because
206:
By the late 1990s, the O Street Market had once more become dilapidated. The structure fell into disrepair, trash collected around the structure, many vendors were squatteers without leases, and drug dealers and gang members loitered near the building, driving customers away. The building's owner
354:
What I don't see in the review is sufficient attention being paid to problematic prose and grammar. For example, take the first paragraph in the 21st century section. The first two sentences both use the word "rehabilitation", which is unnecessarily repetitive. The third sentence has issues with
294:
On each street-facing facade of the tower there are two sets of doors with large transom windows. Each set of doors is framed by columns topped with cast iron foliate capitals. The columns support a projection that features decorative brickwork and a segmental
376:, is a bit rough, and should be revised. Minor things include missing hyphens (e.g., mid-2011, 19th-century public markets), but all of these should be found by the reviewer and pointed out so they can be fixed by the nominator.
412:
you think it's strange—despite the fact that it is correct
English usage and thus required by the criteria. In short, you're using your own opinions and feelings rather than properly applying the GA criteria.
367:
First the projects stalls, and then it stalls for two years. Is this a second stall, or the same one? This is the sort of unclear wording that should be fixed during the review.
357:
They proposed the partial closure of a 40-foot (12 m) wide plaza on 8th Street into a sidewalk, parking lot, and retail space, and for the addition of new windows in the walls.
350:
I am very disappointed that this was passed without all the issues brought up on the reviewer's talk page having been addressed. I posted the following there three days ago:
359:
The fourth and seventh sentences start with "But"; starting sentences with conjunctions is something that should be done sparingly. Then the final sentence ends with
47:
80:
429:
Honestly, I've been rather confused on how to proceed with this nomination. I noticed yesterday that it had been promoted, but if there are still issues (like
365:
Redevelopment of the O Street Market then stalled for two years as the developers sought to meet the demands imposed by the
Historic Preservation Review Board.
70:
126:
122:
52:
374:
In the middle of the store, arches utilizing some of the original brickwork designated the former location of the market's exterior wall.
107:
99:
75:
451:
264:
230:
180:
156:
446:
278:
259:
225:
175:
417:
381:
115:
17:
391:
I knew that the "design" section has some problems, and some details go off the topic, and hyphens
207:
fell behind on tax payments, and the city threatened to place a lien on the building and foreclose.
318:
I will try to put this article on hold, or else I will ask the 2nd opinion, you can discuss them.
402:
336:
304:
150:
432:
413:
377:
284:
199:
92:
211:
Late 1990s is PROBABLY still in the 20th century, so I think that it's kind of weird.
440:
399:
333:
301:
146:
458:
421:
406:
385:
340:
308:
271:
237:
187:
160:
170:
This article is generally OK, but I found some issues and have questions:
299:
Over-detailed, if shorter or closer to the main article will be better.
397:
use here (e.g., 19th-century, cause it strange). Anyway, it's OK.
355:
prose and grammar, including unclear antecedents and referents:
437:
mentioned above), I'll be more than happy to address them.
258:
Yes, I think so. What area do you think goes off topic?
361:
but there were years of delays and the project stalled.
134:
103:
254:this article stays on the topic most of the time?
174:Thanks for taking the time to review the article.
292:
204:
363:, followed immediately by the new paragraph's
8:
30:
61:
33:
373:
364:
360:
356:
7:
24:
216:
1:
331:, it looks much better now.
459:18:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
422:15:17, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
407:09:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
386:09:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
341:07:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
309:23:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
272:21:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
238:21:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
188:21:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
161:08:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
474:
297:
285:O Street Market#Design
209:
279:AgnosticPreachersKid
202:" section, it says:
18:Talk:O Street Market
454:whisper in my ear
267:whisper in my ear
233:whisper in my ear
183:whisper in my ear
89:
88:
465:
456:
444:
436:
330:
282:
269:
235:
224:
220:
219:
185:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
473:
472:
468:
467:
466:
464:
463:
462:
452:
438:
430:
348:
326:
276:
265:
231:
217:
215:
181:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
471:
469:
427:
426:
425:
424:
369:
368:
347:
344:
324:
323:
316:
315:
291:
290:
289:
288:
246:
245:
241:
240:
196:
195:
191:
190:
168:
167:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
470:
461:
460:
457:
455:
450:
449:
442:
434:
423:
419:
415:
410:
409:
408:
405:
404:
401:
396:
395:
390:
389:
388:
387:
383:
379:
375:
366:
362:
358:
353:
352:
351:
345:
343:
342:
339:
338:
335:
329:
321:
320:
319:
313:
312:
311:
310:
307:
306:
303:
296:
286:
280:
275:
274:
273:
270:
268:
263:
262:
257:
256:
255:
253:
252:
243:
242:
239:
236:
234:
229:
228:
223:
214:
213:
212:
208:
203:
201:
193:
192:
189:
186:
184:
179:
178:
173:
172:
171:
165:
164:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
453:
447:
428:
398:
393:
392:
370:
349:
332:
327:
325:
317:
300:
298:
293:
266:
260:
250:
249:
247:
232:
226:
221:
210:
205:
200:21st century
197:
182:
176:
169:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
433:BlueMoonset
414:BlueMoonset
378:BlueMoonset
104:visual edit
394:SHOULD NOT
314:Conclusion
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
244:Questions
198:In this "
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
441:333-blue
157:contribs
147:333-blue
76:Criteria
346:Comment
248:Do you
166:Summary
127:history
108:history
94:Article
322:Result
194:Issues
403:-blue
337:-blue
305:-blue
295:arch.
283:from
136:Watch
16:<
418:talk
382:talk
328:Pass
251:SURE
222:Done
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
448:APK
400:333
334:333
302:333
261:APK
227:APK
177:APK
420:)
384:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
443::
439:@
435::
431:@
416:(
380:(
287::
281::
277:@
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.