Knowledge

Talk:On the Art of the Cinema/GA1

Source πŸ“

735:. In this case, I've reproduced proper names as they appear ("Kim Jong-il", "Aesthetic Review Meeting" and other party organizations, names of films). There is no free content involved as the source (David-West 2009) and all others are copyrighted. As for quoting, I don't feel that it's necessary here; the source offers no particularly poignant wording and skillful paraphrasing leads to a more encyclopedic outcome here. I've further changed the wording to avoid close paraphrasing. Are we in agreement that the level of paraphrasing is now acceptable? Changes: 515: 294: 1351: 1331: 1291: 1223: 1174: 1158: 1138: 1107: 1371: 1266: 1243: 1194: 1071: 42: 995: 571: 207: 176: 910:: "Concise opinions that are not overly emotive can often be reported with attribution instead of direct quotation. Use of quotation marks around simple descriptive terms can often seem to imply something doubtful regarding the material being quoted; sarcasm or weasel words, like "supposedly" or "so called", might be inferred." 762:
Phrasing like "In total, Kim had obtained around a decade of experience in the state arts bureaucracy by this time" is far too close to the source material and requires paraphrasing. "State arts bureaucracy" could easily be changed to government arts council or something else that fits into the NK
315:
I've read this many times and I find it too informal. Could you clean it up a bit? There are many different ways you could do it, but something like this might work as a good starting point: "The influence of the book on North Korean films is disputed." This sentence could then be briefly expanded
716:
Here's a simple three-step checklist to help you fix the close paraphrasing and avoid it in the future: 1) do exceptions apply, such as proper nouns or free content? If yes, leave it, if no, then 2) look to see if the material is a good candidate for quoting and attributing. If yes, add the quotes
688:
You're right, "creative industry" isn't the same thing as "state arts bureaucracy". I tried to find an equivalent to avoid close paraphrasing but the meaning was altered. I have returned "state arts bureaucracy". I have also returned the destruction of the conference archive, as it seems relevant
666:
Thank you for making an effort. Looking at the diffs, there is now an unclear anachronism (creative industry instead of government) and inadvertent downplaying and omission (prohibition instead of burning of books). You might want to leave it but come back to it, perhaps with a second source.
395:
I've separated these two phrases to form a new paragraph and got rid of the problematic words. It now eliminates a problematic POV that suggested that because the book had a political role it should have had an effect on filmmaking (no sources suggest this). It now reads: "The impact of
861:"Foreign" appears in double quotation marks in the source. I am unsure as to what the source is trying to do here: quote Kim (the source quotes Kim immediately after the sentence) or express its own POV. In either case, I'm quoting the opinion of either Kim or David-West. 241:
On Knowledge, the convention is to use the full name in the first instance, followed by a surname in subsequent instances. Some editors repeat this convention for each section. So for each section, use the full name first, followed by "Kim" for second usage.
337:
I've replaced it with the following: "Its actual impact on North Korean filmmaking, however, is disputed. Films from before and after the publication of the treatise are very similar in style and many contemporary films breach various rules laid out in
781:. I have rephrased the problematic parts to read: "Kim had worked in the government arts administration for almost ten years by this time." I also altered wordings in other sections to avoid close paraphrasing. Changes: 638:
you are right; some of it is very closely paraphrased (since the source is copyrighted, this is unacceptable). I believe I have fixed it now, but let me know if you think something that should be refined:
689:
enough. I tried to see if some other sources have something more to say about this, but I couldn't find anything. If you think this section needs more work, I'll take another look more sources. Changes:
400:
on North Korean filmmaking is disputed. Films from before and after the publication of the treatise are similar in style and many contemporary films breach various rules laid out in the treatise."
717:
and attribute the source, if no, then 3) rewrite the material using your own phrasing and wording that best summarizes the material. Now, see if you can apply this to the above problem.
47: 126: 1152: 80: 763:
political structure. "Decade of experience" also needs to be paraphrased. Again, please review the current content because I don't want to raise this issue again.
122: 957:
How about: Kim forbade discussion on foreign film concepts? Paraphrasing instead of quoting, and eliminating the quotation marks around "foreign" altogether.
52: 107: 70: 839:
Although Kim is known to have been privately interested in Hollywood films, he forbade discussion on 'foreign' film concepts at the Aesthetic Review Meeting
1321: 1101: 1396:
due to personal health problems, I am unable to finish this review. Please request a new reviewer or make a comment on the GAN talk page. Thank you.
99: 371: 1422: 1148: 1041: 1437: 1013: 969: 922: 799: 753: 707: 657: 589: 492: 457: 412: 354: 273: 877:
says "Avoid stating opinions as facts" and recommends explicit attribution (quoting). I could quote the source as saying that Kim:
431:
Question: why doesn't the lead mention the two main theories in the book–the theory of literature as humanics and the seed theory?
466:
Nice work, but please very briefly tell the reader what they are. Remember, the lead should be able to standalone as a summary.
156: 75: 1168: 536:
graduation from what and where? I visited the parent article to find out and it looks like there's a bit of a mystery here.
1425:. I thank you for the wonderful contribution you have made so far to this article and the review. I wish you all the best. 115: 17: 1199: 614: 943:
Thanks, but it seems like a case of paraphrasing is needed instead of quoting. In other words, why quote here at all?
1325: 1341: 1081: 1065: 847:, double quotation marks should be used for "foreign". It isn't exactly clear if you are quoting a POV or not. 1313: 370:
it is certainly an improvement, but try to minimize the use of words like actual, however, very, and many, per
92: 1317: 1237: 1124: 256:
I have done so. I've used "Kim Jong-il" whenever Kim Il-sung is also discussed to avoid confusion. Changes:
1285: 1217: 551: 1433: 1009: 965: 918: 795: 749: 703: 653: 585: 488: 453: 408: 350: 269: 1188: 1184: 844: 617:
of the David-West 2009 source in this section. Please review. Is the David-West source copyrighted?
1401: 983: 948: 852: 813: 768: 722: 672: 622: 559: 541: 471: 436: 379: 321: 247: 220: 189: 150: 1418: 1428: 1391: 1305: 1233: 1132: 1089: 1004: 960: 913: 874: 790: 744: 698: 648: 608: 580: 531: 483: 448: 403: 365: 345: 310: 264: 1441: 1405: 1045: 1017: 987: 973: 952: 926: 856: 817: 803: 772: 757: 726: 711: 676: 661: 626: 593: 563: 545: 496: 475: 461: 440: 416: 383: 358: 325: 277: 251: 224: 193: 160: 1412: 1397: 1256: 1085: 979: 944: 848: 809: 778: 764: 732: 718: 683: 668: 633: 618: 555: 537: 467: 432: 390: 375: 332: 317: 243: 216: 185: 146: 906:
In any case, MOS doesn't recommend quoting a single word with double quotation marks:
514: 293: 1345: 1097: 1093: 1061: 907: 884: 304:
Actual impact on North Korean films themselves, however, is disputed
1423:
Knowledge talk:Good article nominations#New reviewer needed
889: 783: 737: 691: 641: 525:
After his graduation in 1964, Kim Jong-il engaged in...
258: 134: 103: 1417:
I've made the template steps required by the FAQ at
808:I need more patience, who doesn't? Good work. 880:"banned discussion on 'foreign' film concepts" 878: 8: 1340:B. Images are provided if possible and are 30: 1068:", without spelling and grammar errors: 372:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Words to watch 61: 33: 7: 978:Please try it and see if it works. 1263:Fair representation without bias: 1193: 1070: 887:). I've implemented this. Change: 24: 1369: 1349: 1329: 1289: 1264: 1241: 1221: 1192: 1172: 1156: 1136: 1105: 1069: 993: 569: 513: 292: 205: 174: 1370: 1265: 1242: 550:The source you are using says 1: 1442:10:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 1406:08:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 1133:appropriate reference section 777:Thank you for your patience, 18:Talk:On the Art of the Cinema 1350: 1330: 1290: 1222: 1200:Knowledge:Close paraphrasing 1173: 1157: 1137: 1106: 1018:13:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC) 988:20:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC) 974:03:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC) 953:20:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC) 927:11:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC) 857:03:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC) 818:10:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC) 804:03:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC) 773:03:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC) 758:02:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC) 727:22:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 712:16:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 677:10:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 662:15:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC) 627:03:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC) 615:Knowledge:Close paraphrasing 594:23:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC) 564:23:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC) 546:20:30, 28 January 2016 (UTC) 497:13:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC) 480:Agreed. I have done so now. 476:20:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC) 462:03:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC) 441:20:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC) 417:15:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC) 384:03:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC) 359:02:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC) 326:01:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC) 278:11:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC) 252:03:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC) 225:01:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC) 194:01:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC) 161:07:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC) 1460: 445:It should; I've added it. 316:to summarize the dispute. 203: 172: 1322:valid fair use rationales 1309:to illustrate the topic? 1421:and posted a message at 398:On the Art of the Cinema 340:On the Art of the Cinema 1344:to the topic, and have 1055:reasonably well written 908:MOS:QUOTE#Point of view 882: 552:Kim Il-sung University 374:and other guidelines. 1211:broad in its coverage 883:. (single quotes per 1185:copyright violations 1169:No original research 731:Thanks for the tip, 613:I see an issue with 554:. Can you add that? 1384:New reviewer needed 1120:factually accurate 231:Naming conventions 1346:suitable captions 1324:are provided for 342:." Is this okay? 89: 88: 1451: 1431: 1416: 1395: 1373: 1372: 1353: 1352: 1333: 1332: 1326:non-free content 1318:copyright status 1293: 1292: 1268: 1267: 1245: 1244: 1225: 1224: 1196: 1195: 1176: 1175: 1160: 1159: 1149:reliable sources 1140: 1139: 1109: 1108: 1073: 1072: 1007: 1001: 997: 996: 963: 916: 892: 793: 786: 747: 740: 701: 694: 687: 651: 644: 637: 612: 583: 577: 573: 572: 535: 517: 486: 451: 406: 394: 369: 348: 336: 314: 296: 267: 261: 209: 208: 178: 177: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1426: 1410: 1389: 1386: 1153:where necessary 1084:compliance for 1038: 1002: 994: 992: 958: 911: 888: 788: 782: 742: 736: 696: 690: 681: 646: 640: 631: 606: 578: 570: 568: 529: 511: 481: 446: 401: 388: 363: 343: 330: 308: 290: 262: 257: 233: 212: 211: 206: 202: 181: 180: 175: 171: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1457: 1455: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1385: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1368:Pass or Fail: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1312:A. Images are 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1094:words to watch 1078: 1077: 1076: 1037: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 510: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 289: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 232: 229: 228: 227: 204: 201: 198: 197: 196: 173: 170: 167: 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1456: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1424: 1420: 1414: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1393: 1388: 1387: 1383: 1375: 1374: 1367: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1355: 1354: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1308: 1307: 1301: 1295: 1294: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1280: 1276: 1270: 1269: 1262: 1261: 1259: 1258: 1253: 1247: 1246: 1239: 1238:summary style 1235: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1219: 1218:Major aspects 1215: 1214: 1212: 1208: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1141: 1134: 1130: 1129: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1117: 1111: 1110: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1067: 1063: 1060:A. Prose is " 1059: 1058: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1047: 1044:review – see 1043: 1035: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1006: 1000: 991: 990: 989: 985: 981: 977: 976: 975: 971: 967: 962: 956: 955: 954: 950: 946: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 928: 924: 920: 915: 909: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 891: 886: 881: 876: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 860: 859: 858: 854: 850: 846: 845:WP:QUOTEMARKS 842: 841: 840: 837: 819: 815: 811: 807: 806: 805: 801: 797: 792: 785: 780: 776: 775: 774: 770: 766: 761: 760: 759: 755: 751: 746: 739: 734: 730: 729: 728: 724: 720: 715: 714: 713: 709: 705: 700: 693: 685: 680: 679: 678: 674: 670: 665: 664: 663: 659: 655: 650: 643: 635: 630: 629: 628: 624: 620: 616: 610: 605: 604: 595: 591: 587: 582: 576: 567: 566: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 548: 547: 543: 539: 533: 528: 527: 526: 523: 522: 521: 520: 516: 508: 498: 494: 490: 485: 479: 478: 477: 473: 469: 465: 464: 463: 459: 455: 450: 444: 443: 442: 438: 434: 430: 429: 418: 414: 410: 405: 399: 392: 387: 386: 385: 381: 377: 373: 367: 362: 361: 360: 356: 352: 347: 341: 334: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 312: 307: 306: 305: 302: 301: 300: 299: 295: 287: 279: 275: 271: 266: 260: 255: 254: 253: 249: 245: 240: 239: 238: 235: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 213: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 182: 168: 166: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 1362: 1303: 1278: 1255: 1210: 1202:is a concern 1123: 1119: 1054: 1048:for criteria 1040: 1039: 998: 879: 838: 574: 524: 518: 512: 397: 339: 303: 297: 291: 236: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 1429:Finnusertop 1392:Finnusertop 1316:with their 1005:Finnusertop 961:Finnusertop 914:Finnusertop 791:Finnusertop 745:Finnusertop 699:Finnusertop 649:Finnusertop 609:Finnusertop 581:Finnusertop 532:Finnusertop 484:Finnusertop 449:Finnusertop 404:Finnusertop 366:Finnusertop 346:Finnusertop 311:Finnusertop 265:Finnusertop 237:Kim Jong-il 104:visual edit 1189:plagiarism 1131:A. Has an 1125:verifiable 509:Background 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 1413:Viriditas 1398:Viriditas 1286:edit wars 1147:B. Cites 980:Viriditas 945:Viriditas 875:WP:YESPOV 849:Viriditas 810:Viriditas 779:Viriditas 765:Viriditas 733:Viriditas 719:Viriditas 684:Viriditas 669:Viriditas 634:Viriditas 619:Viriditas 556:Viriditas 538:Viriditas 468:Viriditas 433:Viriditas 391:Viriditas 376:Viriditas 333:Viriditas 318:Viriditas 244:Viriditas 217:Viriditas 186:Viriditas 147:Viriditas 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 1438:contribs 1342:relevant 1304:contain 1302:Does it 1046:WP:WIAGA 1036:Criteria 1014:contribs 970:contribs 923:contribs 800:contribs 754:contribs 708:contribs 658:contribs 590:contribs 519:Doing... 493:contribs 458:contribs 413:contribs 355:contribs 298:Doing... 274:contribs 210:Resolved 179:Resolved 157:contribs 76:Criteria 1363:Overall 1288:, etc: 1257:neutral 1234:Focused 1098:fiction 1066:concise 885:MOS:QWQ 200:Infobox 127:history 108:history 94:Article 1419:WT:GAN 1320:, and 1314:tagged 1306:images 1279:stable 1277:Is it 1254:Is it 1209:Is it 1183:D. No 1118:Is it 1100:, and 1090:layout 1053:Is it 169:Images 1236:(see 1102:lists 1062:clear 136:Watch 16:< 1434:talk 1402:talk 1187:nor 1122:and 1086:lead 1064:and 1010:talk 999:Done 984:talk 966:talk 949:talk 919:talk 890:diff 853:talk 843:Per 814:talk 796:talk 784:diff 769:talk 750:talk 738:diff 723:talk 704:talk 692:diff 673:talk 654:talk 642:diff 623:talk 586:talk 575:Done 560:talk 542:talk 489:talk 472:talk 454:talk 437:talk 409:talk 380:talk 351:talk 322:talk 288:Lead 270:talk 259:diff 248:talk 221:talk 215:OK. 190:talk 184:OK. 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 1284:No 1240:): 1232:B. 1216:A. 1167:C. 1082:MoS 1080:B. 1440:) 1436:β‹… 1427:– 1404:) 1365:: 1348:: 1328:: 1281:? 1260:? 1220:: 1213:? 1191:: 1171:: 1155:: 1151:, 1135:: 1128:? 1104:: 1096:, 1092:, 1088:, 1057:? 1042:GA 1016:) 1012:β‹… 1003:– 986:) 972:) 968:β‹… 959:– 951:) 925:) 921:β‹… 912:– 855:) 816:) 802:) 798:β‹… 789:– 787:. 771:) 756:) 752:β‹… 743:– 741:. 725:) 710:) 706:β‹… 697:– 695:. 675:) 660:) 656:β‹… 647:– 645:. 625:) 592:) 588:β‹… 579:– 562:) 544:) 495:) 491:β‹… 482:– 474:) 460:) 456:β‹… 447:– 439:) 415:) 411:β‹… 402:– 382:) 357:) 353:β‹… 344:– 324:) 276:) 272:β‹… 263:– 250:) 223:) 192:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 1432:( 1415:: 1411:@ 1400:( 1394:: 1390:@ 1008:( 982:( 964:( 947:( 917:( 893:. 851:( 812:( 794:( 767:( 748:( 721:( 702:( 686:: 682:@ 671:( 652:( 636:: 632:@ 621:( 611:: 607:@ 584:( 558:( 540:( 534:: 530:@ 487:( 470:( 452:( 435:( 407:( 393:: 389:@ 378:( 368:: 364:@ 349:( 335:: 331:@ 320:( 313:: 309:@ 268:( 246:( 219:( 188:( 154:Β· 149:( 132:Β· 129:) 121:( 113:Β· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:On the Art of the Cinema
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Viriditas
talk
contribs
07:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Viriditas
talk
01:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Viriditas
talk
01:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Viriditas
talk
03:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
diff
Finnusertop

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑