601:
at some of the pseudo-scientific absurdities occasionally still found in contemporary astronomy. In other words there is every reason to think that what was said was quite likely to be true and should at least arguably have initially been left in the article, with some or all of the citations replaced by "citation needed" requests, and only removed if no RS citations had turned up after whatever our rules describe as a reasonable period of time. After a little further thought I may well soon decide to at least temporarily restore it with such citations needed added.
689:
185:
175:
154:
74:
570:
bizarre demands that central lunar eclipses last ½ a day, and that the Moon retrogrades against the stars every day. The testimony of
Archimedes indeed disagrees on the solar diameter by a factor of 4. In 2011, it was first pointed out that the work's best-known data, its 87° half-Moon solar elongation-limit and 2° solar diameter, are mathematically incompatible with each other, given the precision of human vision.
53:
290:
269:
300:
22:
84:
600:
The above removal is arguably somewhat unsatisfactory. Though it presumably does not qualify as a RS (indeed it looks like OR), there is little or no reason to think that the blog is a joke, as distinct from an occasionally slightly humorous but scholarly look (backed up by some scholarly citations)
615:
Further research indicates that Thomas Heath (1913) mentions and rejects some early doubters, notably
Voltaire, and that these should probably be mentioned in the article, perhaps in a section called Authenticity, or perhaps Authorship, along with a few other citations showing that most RS today do
441:
Furthermore
Aristarchus could have underestimated the anglular distance between the sun and the moon as his result was amazing even as it was. Anaxagoras had to leave Athens for claiming that the sun was greater then the Peloponnese. Had he discovered that the distance to the sun was 380 times that
406:
Since the distances given in the table are apparently not in
Aristarchus, they should be described clearly as modern reconstructions. Interestingly, van Helden gives two possible reconstructions, one (drawing on a value of the Moon's apparent diameter found in Aristarchus) yields your distances to
788:
The lunar eclipse method relies upon knowing s, the absolute radius of the Sun. But there is no explanation as to how that could be known. If one knows s then the distance to the sun can be trivially calculated by observing the apparent angular size. Determining s is the crux of the problem.
427:
I suggest the article could use some editing to simplify it slightly. It is no major thing just that I find it unnecessarily difficult to read and one needs to re-read it a bit too much. It could for be stated for example that θ is the angular radius of the moon seen from earth and that d is the
569:
However, since the time of
Voltaire questions have existed as to whether the work is genuinely Aristarchus'. In 2009, it was revealed that misunderstanding the ancient angular unit "meros" appears to have introduced an error by a factor of 4 into several calculations, which explains the work's
762:
was the definition of the 1st quarter moon which occurs at 90 degrees at quadrature. But in trying to find a scientific definition I'm finding none, just pages that conflate dichotomy, quadrature, quarter and/or half. So I don't know, and nobody has citing sources either
486:
The picture is missing the segment marking t-d on the Earth radius line and the line 90 degrees to it forming the triangle between the earth, the shadow of Earth on the moon, and the ray from the sun. I don't know how to amend the picture.
378:
Any feedback on this page would be greatly appreciated, especially verification of my numbers, both those of
Aristarchus and the modern values. The images should be improved, but I don't have the programs to do it right now.
437:
Also the most important hypothesis of
Aristarchus, though very obvious but which he nevertheless stated, is that the moon receives its light from the sun. (Thomas L. Heath, Greek Astronomy, Dover Publications, 1991, p.100)
456:
Please note that there is no need for formulas to compare the sizes of earth and moon, just simple observation of the earths shadow as it appears on the moon surface during the beginning or the end of a lunar eclipse.
216:
616:
not have such doubts. I may or may not eventually get around to doing that myself. Meanwhile the rest of the removed stuff is not RS, and I have found no RS backing online, so it should probably stay removed.
402:
According to van Helden (1985, pp. 8-9) "Aristarchus did not calculate these absolute distances, however! After a determination of the ratio of volumes of the Moon and Earth, the tract ends abruptly."
578:
Astronomy". This stuff looks like a joke, and certainly not a credible source. A credible citation for corrections to
Aristarchus interpretations would be welcome. As for Voltaire... likewise.
828:
838:
251:
241:
136:
843:
211:
795:
If I have missed something, then others will have too and it should be noted in the article. I believe this is a case of the maths obscuring the main point.
858:
833:
518:
I am not clear how n = d/â„“ is measured. I believe that this might be done using the duration of the lunar eclipse. Could some one elaborate on this point?
823:
692:
Since the Sun is not infinitely far away, the Moon is slightly past first quarter phase when the Sun and Moon are perpendicular in the sky to each other.
126:
696:
I don't see how this fits into your excellent article, but this diagram is intended for
Astronomy students at a more conceptual (introductory level)--
207:
198:
159:
356:
539:
There are a thousand possible explanations of the 2 degrees for the angular diameter of the sun. A scribe might have used it in error for 1/2.
853:
792:
Consider a smaller sun moved closer to the earth so that the apparent size is the same. The observation of its shadow would also be the same.
346:
863:
818:
585:
546:
464:
740:
322:
848:
97:
58:
492:
313:
274:
33:
206:
content on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
203:
529:
190:
720:
701:
525:
488:
417:
Please make a note of this in the article as you see fit. That information certainly belongs in the article! --
407:
the Moon of 20 earth radii, to the Sun of 380 e.r.; the other puts the Moon at 80 e.r, the Sun at 1,520 e.r. --
589:
550:
468:
744:
574:
The references lead to a personal web page and to references to Vol. 1 No. 1 of "DIO & The Journal for
804:
775:
748:
724:
712:
705:
625:
610:
593:
554:
505:
496:
472:
446:
432:
421:
411:
392:
383:
521:
502:
443:
429:
39:
688:
754:
Is the description for that image correct? Dichotomy (half-lit) occurs at 89.85 degrees, 0.15 degrees
736:
581:
542:
515:"The above equations give the radii of the Moon and Sun entirely in terms of observable quantities."
460:
21:
716:
697:
621:
606:
408:
321:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
800:
771:
89:
733:
The link to the 2011 effort of Alberto Gomez Gomez does not work, at least with me, now.
617:
602:
174:
153:
812:
796:
767:
418:
389:
380:
305:
561:
Removed dubious paragraph -- is there another citation for similar conclusions?
289:
268:
295:
180:
79:
670:
501:
I think the quantity t-s in the picture under "Lunar Eclipse" should be s-t.
102:
73:
52:
766:
As a side note: the dark light side and the light dark side bugs me...
388:
Typo: in the second construction, the label "t-s" should read "s-t". --
442:
of the moon he would surely have a hard time accepting it himself. --
318:
657:
646:
687:
15:
210:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
428:
radius of the cone which represents the earths shadow. --
317:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
511:
Observable quantities in measurement of moon's size
217:History of Science Collaboration of the Month
8:
829:C-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
101:, which collaborates on articles related to
839:Low-importance history of science articles
734:
263:
148:
47:
202:, an attempt to improve and organize the
226:Knowledge:WikiProject History of Science
844:WikiProject History of Science articles
636:
265:
229:Template:WikiProject History of Science
150:
49:
19:
642:
640:
7:
311:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
859:WikiProject Greece general articles
834:C-Class history of science articles
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
824:Low-importance Astronomy articles
711:Hey, I just found a home for it!
672:Aristarchos of Samos the Polymath
452:Radius of moon compared to earths
647:http://www.dioi.org/cot.htm#mmlt
298:
288:
267:
183:
173:
152:
82:
72:
51:
20:
351:This article has been rated as
246:This article has been rated as
131:This article has been rated as
111:Knowledge:WikiProject Astronomy
214:. You can also help with the
199:History of Science WikiProject
114:Template:WikiProject Astronomy
1:
854:Low-importance Greek articles
393:08:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
384:08:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
325:and see a list of open tasks.
864:All WikiProject Greece pages
805:21:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
776:23:22, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
749:08:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
555:15:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
506:05:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
331:Knowledge:WikiProject Greece
196:This article is part of the
626:02:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
611:00:46, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
530:05:56, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
447:14:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
433:14:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
334:Template:WikiProject Greece
232:history of science articles
880:
819:C-Class Astronomy articles
357:project's importance scale
252:project's importance scale
137:project's importance scale
594:21:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
497:07:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
473:20:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
422:16:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
412:15:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
350:
283:
245:
191:History of science portal
168:
130:
67:
46:
784:Absolute size of the sun
725:14:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
706:14:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
398:Distance to Sun and Moon
849:C-Class Greek articles
713:Quadrature (astronomy)
693:
28:This article is rated
691:
535:Possible explanations
98:WikiProject Astronomy
669:Gomez, A. G. (2011)
510:
489:TryingToUnderstand11
694:
314:WikiProject Greece
223:History of Science
204:history of science
160:History of Science
117:Astronomy articles
34:content assessment
751:
739:comment added by
584:comment added by
545:comment added by
475:
463:comment added by
371:
370:
367:
366:
363:
362:
262:
261:
258:
257:
147:
146:
143:
142:
871:
676:
667:
661:
655:
649:
644:
596:
557:
458:
339:
338:
335:
332:
329:
308:
303:
302:
301:
292:
285:
284:
279:
271:
264:
234:
233:
230:
227:
224:
193:
188:
187:
186:
177:
170:
169:
164:
156:
149:
119:
118:
115:
112:
109:
92:
90:Astronomy portal
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
879:
878:
874:
873:
872:
870:
869:
868:
809:
808:
786:
686:
681:
680:
679:
668:
664:
656:
652:
645:
638:
579:
563:
540:
537:
513:
484:
482:Bugs in Picture
454:
400:
376:
336:
333:
330:
327:
326:
304:
299:
297:
277:
231:
228:
225:
222:
221:
189:
184:
182:
162:
116:
113:
110:
107:
106:
88:
83:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
877:
875:
867:
866:
861:
856:
851:
846:
841:
836:
831:
826:
821:
811:
810:
785:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
764:
752:
728:
727:
717:Guy vandegrift
698:Guy vandegrift
685:
682:
678:
677:
662:
660:‡2 §C pp.18-25
650:
635:
634:
630:
629:
628:
613:
572:
571:
562:
559:
536:
533:
522:Trebauchet1986
512:
509:
503:69.124.189.188
483:
480:
478:
453:
450:
444:83.226.131.224
430:83.226.131.224
425:
424:
409:SteveMcCluskey
399:
396:
375:
372:
369:
368:
365:
364:
361:
360:
353:Low-importance
349:
343:
342:
340:
337:Greek articles
323:the discussion
310:
309:
293:
281:
280:
278:Low‑importance
272:
260:
259:
256:
255:
248:Low-importance
244:
238:
237:
235:
195:
194:
178:
166:
165:
163:Low‑importance
157:
145:
144:
141:
140:
133:Low-importance
129:
123:
122:
120:
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
876:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
840:
837:
835:
832:
830:
827:
825:
822:
820:
817:
816:
814:
807:
806:
802:
798:
793:
790:
783:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
750:
746:
742:
738:
732:
731:
730:
729:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
709:
708:
707:
703:
699:
690:
683:
674:
673:
666:
663:
659:
654:
651:
648:
643:
641:
637:
633:
627:
623:
619:
614:
612:
608:
604:
599:
598:
597:
595:
591:
587:
586:86.140.51.175
583:
577:
568:
567:
566:
560:
558:
556:
552:
548:
544:
534:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
516:
508:
507:
504:
499:
498:
494:
490:
481:
479:
476:
474:
470:
466:
462:
451:
449:
448:
445:
439:
435:
434:
431:
423:
420:
416:
415:
414:
413:
410:
404:
397:
395:
394:
391:
386:
385:
382:
373:
358:
354:
348:
345:
344:
341:
324:
320:
316:
315:
307:
306:Greece portal
296:
294:
291:
287:
286:
282:
276:
273:
270:
266:
253:
249:
243:
240:
239:
236:
219:
218:
213:
209:
205:
201:
200:
192:
181:
179:
176:
172:
171:
167:
161:
158:
155:
151:
138:
134:
128:
125:
124:
121:
105:on Knowledge.
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
794:
791:
787:
759:
755:
735:— Preceding
695:
671:
665:
653:
631:
580:— Preceding
575:
573:
564:
547:86.176.7.150
541:— Preceding
538:
520:
517:
514:
500:
485:
477:
465:77.49.11.149
455:
440:
436:
426:
405:
401:
387:
377:
352:
312:
247:
215:
208:project page
197:
132:
96:
40:WikiProjects
741:36.70.3.227
459:—Preceding
813:Categories
632:References
576:Hysterical
212:discussion
760:I thought
684:New image
618:Tlhslobus
603:Tlhslobus
565:Removed:
108:Astronomy
103:Astronomy
59:Astronomy
797:Tuntable
768:Skintigh
737:unsigned
582:unsigned
543:unsigned
461:unsigned
419:Dantheox
390:Dantheox
381:Dantheox
374:Untitled
355:on the
250:on the
135:on the
30:C-class
756:before
658:DIO 14
328:Greece
319:Greece
275:Greece
36:scale.
758:what
801:talk
772:talk
763:way.
745:talk
721:talk
702:talk
622:talk
607:talk
590:talk
551:talk
526:talk
493:talk
469:talk
347:Low
242:Low
127:Low
815::
803:)
774:)
747:)
723:)
704:)
639:^
624:)
609:)
592:)
553:)
528:)
495:)
487:--
471:)
379:--
799:(
770:(
743:(
719:(
715:-
700:(
675:.
620:(
605:(
588:(
549:(
524:(
491:(
467:(
359:.
254:.
220:.
139:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
