Knowledge

Talk:One by One (Foo Fighters album)/GA1

Source 📝

305:"Regarding his choice, the producer speculated Grohl 'was having a hard time finding a guy who would commit to sitting in his basement for four months', and eventually picked Raskulinewicz because 'Dave liked my energy and enthusiasm' and 'could tell I was a fan'". Can be written as "The producer speculated that Grohl, having found difficulty in choosing someone 'who would commit to sitting in his basement for four months', eventually picked Raskulinewicz for his energetic and enthusiastic nature." 652: 639: 606: 389: 42: 458:
This sentence is probably a bit too long and needs to be trimmed or split: "Grohl would usually write the lyrics after finishing the vocal track for another song, and the singer said that despite the angry content of some lyrics, he drew no inspiration from Courtney Love—with whom he had arguments
672:
I think all aspects of the GA criteria have been covered. I would recommend you clean up the reference formatting and dig for some more information on the chart performance and sales. However, the article's good enough as is for GA. Great work and may there be more.
444:"The band also showed disappointment with the ten tracks that came out of the sessions, as Hawkins described them as 'million-dollar demos'". - If he was disappointed, why did he describe them as "million-dollar demos"? Isn't that supposed to be a positive remark? 309:"... declaring that when he considered the rough mixes "sucked a lot of the life out of the songs" and "soundd like another band playing our songs"." – this is a actually a bit confusing. "declaring that"? Do you mean "realizing this"... 459:
and lawsuits regarding Nirvana, the band on which Grohl and Love's late husband Kurt Cobain played—to which he was surprised as derogatory references to Love usually "snuck in" in songs such as "I'll Stick Around" and "Stacked Actors"."
47: 276:"One by One was considered the band's heaviest up to that point, with Grohl describing the sound of it as 'different than anything we've ever done in that it is darker and more aggressive'." – needs 126: 642:
Images have suitable captions and sources and non-free image has good fair-use rationale. There has not been any major issues with neutrality or edit disputes either. Looks good.
122: 221:
It's ref 11 now, the MusicRadar one. I think the quotation about "commit to sitting in his basement for four months" is on page 2 of the article, not page 1. Please specify. —
107: 52: 99: 288:"Grohl said the album was 'all about the energy of playing live'" – quotation marks should surround "the album was all about the energy of playing live" per source. 80: 200:
I know GA criteria does not ask for absolutely perfect references--which and this article definitely does not have--but I think you should add accessdates for
308:"... declaring that when he considered the rough mixes 'sucked a lot of the life out of the songs' and 'soundd like another band playing our songs'." --: --> 70: 322:
I think the best thing to do would be for me to get in there and do some paraphrasing myself and I'll list concerns that you may be better at addressing. —
156: 462:
The composition needs a reduction on quotations. I'm hoping you can do that in fear that I might incorrectly interpret something. Thank you. —
115: 17: 601:. That is to say, the class should be "wikitable sortable plainrowheaders" and a "!scope=row" must precede each item in the first column. 532:
Sure! I'd love to do some paraphrasing myself, but your pitching in to help is always appreciated. You're the nominator after all. —
319:"...as Grohl described the sound as a darker and more aggressive approach as opposed to the band's usual work." (needs source btw) 315:"... with Grohl describing the sound of it as "different than anything we've ever done in that it is darker and more aggressive"." 92: 75: 173:
This is one of the longer articles I'll be reviewing, so it's most likely I'll be copy editing as I go. Feel free to revert. —
452:"One by One was considered the band's heaviest up to that point" – Up to what point? Describe a specific period of time. 150: 277: 204:
online references. In the case that one of them dies, you will at least know, when the information was retrieved.
674: 610: 533: 498: 463: 408: 323: 248: 222: 174: 146: 663: 563: 524: 489: 435: 349: 691: 666: 627: 566: 550: 527: 515: 492: 480: 438: 425: 352: 340: 265: 239: 191: 160: 379: 455:"...and the short period during which the re-recordings were done." needs direct inline citation. 447:
Well, if they were supposed to be the finished tracks, calling them demos means dissapointment!
660: 598: 560: 521: 486: 432: 346: 576: 403:"The sessions took four months and were at the cost of over $ 500,000." – What currency? 579:
was much critical of the album," – much what? More? Do you mean "very critical" instead?
485:
Done those too... though you might comment if there's any quotation you still question.
218:
Excuse me? The whole section is adapted from the article on Raskulinewicz linked there!
497:
It's still a bit too dense in quotations. Try and find some easy ones to paraphrase. —
296:
The article is a bit too heavy on quotations. I suggest heavy copyediting throughout.
368: 364: 375: 312:
The last paragraph in the Production section alone 35 words in quotation.
302:
I see some quotations simply unnecessary and verbatim. A few examples:
597:
Tables in the Charts and certification need to be formatted by
207:
Ref 8 does not support that the studio was in Topanga.
134: 103: 166:
Article has passed and the review has been completed.
586:'there are great songs there, and then there are... 8: 345:Changed those, are there any more examples? 590:of great songs'." How did he say something 400:What exactly does "working the demos" mean? 30: 559:Cut some reviewer quotes, anything else? 380:"In+Music+We+Trust" exists in print too 61: 33: 7: 651: 638: 605: 520:You mean on Reception or elsewhere? 388: 18:Talk:One by One (Foo Fighters album) 215:Ref 10 does not support quotation. 24: 633:Images, stability and neutrality 244:I put pp. 2-3, it's that enough? 650: 637: 604: 387: 374:Removed the first. The second, 1: 692:11:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 667:01:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 628:19:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 567:03:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 551:16:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 528:16:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 516:19:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 493:18:31, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 481:17:58, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 439:17:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 426:19:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 353:17:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 341:18:51, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 266:18:51, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 240:20:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 192:13:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 161:13:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 431:Done those. Anything else? 708: 582:"... and Shiflett said in 376:has history and standards 210:Added one that supports. 659:Done those last ones. 367:a reliable source? Or 196:Sources and spotcheck 147:Wikipedian Penguin 299:Any suggestions? 89: 88: 699: 686: 685: 654: 653: 641: 640: 622: 621: 608: 607: 545: 544: 510: 509: 475: 474: 420: 419: 391: 390: 335: 334: 260: 259: 234: 233: 186: 185: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 707: 706: 702: 701: 700: 698: 697: 696: 681: 680: 675: 617: 616: 611: 577:Pitchfork Media 540: 539: 534: 505: 504: 499: 470: 469: 464: 415: 414: 409: 330: 329: 324: 278:inline citation 255: 254: 249: 229: 228: 223: 181: 180: 175: 171:Starting soon. 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 705: 703: 695: 694: 676: 657: 656: 644: 643: 631: 630: 612: 602: 595: 580: 575:"Eric Carr of 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 535: 500: 465: 460: 456: 453: 450: 449: 448: 429: 428: 410: 401: 394: 393: 385: 384: 383: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 343: 325: 320: 313: 310: 306: 294: 293: 292: 286: 285: 284: 274: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 250: 242: 224: 213: 212: 211: 205: 176: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 704: 693: 690: 687: 684: 679: 671: 670: 669: 668: 665: 662: 655:Good article. 649: 648: 647: 636: 635: 634: 629: 626: 623: 620: 615: 603: 600: 596: 593: 592:in One by One 589: 585: 581: 578: 574: 568: 565: 562: 558: 552: 549: 546: 543: 538: 531: 530: 529: 526: 523: 519: 518: 517: 514: 511: 508: 503: 496: 495: 494: 491: 488: 484: 483: 482: 479: 476: 473: 468: 461: 457: 454: 451: 446: 445: 443: 442: 441: 440: 437: 434: 427: 424: 421: 418: 413: 406: 402: 399: 398: 397: 386: 381: 377: 373: 372: 370: 366: 362: 354: 351: 348: 344: 342: 339: 336: 333: 328: 321: 318: 314: 311: 307: 304: 303: 301: 300: 298: 297: 295: 290: 289: 287: 282: 281: 279: 275: 267: 264: 261: 258: 253: 246: 245: 243: 241: 238: 235: 232: 227: 220: 219: 217: 216: 214: 209: 208: 206: 203: 199: 198: 197: 194: 193: 190: 187: 184: 179: 172: 168: 167: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 688: 682: 677: 658: 645: 632: 624: 618: 613: 609:Looks good — 591: 587: 583: 547: 541: 536: 512: 506: 501: 477: 471: 466: 430: 422: 416: 411: 404: 395: 337: 331: 326: 316: 262: 256: 251: 236: 230: 225: 201: 195: 188: 182: 177: 170: 169: 165: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 661:igordebraga 561:igordebraga 522:igordebraga 487:igordebraga 433:igordebraga 392:Looks good. 363:What makes 347:igordebraga 247:Suffices. — 104:visual edit 584:One by One 407:dollars? — 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 599:WP:ACCESS 396:Comments 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 157:contribs 76:Criteria 683:PENGUIN 619:PENGUIN 542:PENGUIN 507:PENGUIN 472:PENGUIN 417:PENGUIN 332:PENGUIN 257:PENGUIN 231:PENGUIN 183:PENGUIN 127:history 108:history 94:Article 646:Final 378:, and 317:can be 588:parts 291:Done. 283:Done. 136:Watch 16:< 369:this 365:this 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 678:WP: 614:WP: 537:WP: 502:WP: 467:WP: 412:WP: 327:WP: 252:WP: 226:WP: 202:all 178:WP: 405:US 371:? 280:. 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 689:· 673:— 664:≠ 625:· 594:? 564:≠ 548:· 525:≠ 513:· 490:≠ 478:· 436:≠ 423:· 382:. 350:≠ 338:· 263:· 237:· 189:· 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:One by One (Foo Fighters album)
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Wikipedian Penguin
talk
contribs
13:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
WP:PENGUIN
13:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
WP:PENGUIN
20:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
WP:PENGUIN
18:51, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
inline citation
WP:PENGUIN
18:51, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
igordebraga

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.